Fast FT : Sherwood quits role as Goldman Sachs European co-head

Michael Sherwood, Goldman Sachs’s co-head of Europe, is quitting the investment bank after a three-decade career in which he became one of the industry’s highest earners but was embroiled in a recent spat over BHS, the failed UK retailer.

Often listed as one of the potential successors to Lloyd Blankfein for the top job at Goldman, Mr Sherwood joined the bank at the age of 20 and has overseen rapid growth in its European operations since taking joint charge of them 11 years ago.

Mr Sherwood — widely known as “Woody” — will remain at the bank as a senior director during a handover period of about six months. Richard Gnodde, the other co-head of Goldman Sachs International, will take full control of the European operation.

The departure removes one of Goldman’s longest serving European executives at a time when the bank is grappling with the uncertainty arising from the UK’s exit from the EU, triggering rumours that it may move activities out of London.

Mr Sherwood has faced questions internally from senior executives since being called to appear before a UK parliamentary committee about the bank’s role in advising Sir Philip Green over the retail magnate’s ill-fated sale of BHS, according to people familiar with the matter.

Mr Sherwood was among several senior executives who helped Sir Philip sell BHS to a consortium led by Dominic Chappell, a former bankrupt, about a year before the 88-year-old department store collapsed in April.

He denied his departure was linked to the BHS controversy. “I’ve been talking to Lloyd since well before that about what I want to do next,” he told the Financial Times. “He has spent most of his time trying to persuade me to stay.”

“I didn’t want to have anything out there before I left. On Philip Green, I wish we hadn’t been involved and I certainly don’t think we did anything much wrong,” he said. “It is one blip in a 30-year career and it really played no part in my decision.”

A former fixed income trader, Mr Sherwood has regularly been one of the highest paid employees at Goldman, earning $21m last year. He said his departure was “entirely amicable”, adding: “There are so many great people here and they are already picking over my job”.

Last week, Goldman disclosed that Mr Sherwood had sold $184,810 of shares in the bank, leaving him with 361,978 shares, worth $76.1m at Friday’s closing price.

His time as co-head of Europe has been peppered with controversy, including over Goldman’s role in advising the Greek government on swaps that were criticised for masking the size of the country’s debts.

The bank was last month cleared in a High Court ruling of allegations that it took advantage of the financial inexperience of Libya’s sovereign investment fund to sell it costly and complex financial products.

After leaving Goldman, Mr Sherwood plans to focus on his personal investments and philanthropic activities, particularly Greenhouse Sports, a charity that provides training in various sports to children in poorer parts of London. “I’m absolutely going to take some break before I decide to do anything.”

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
: CMCM +7%, YY +4.3%, IGT +4.3%

M&A news:
  • HW +17.5% (to be acquired by Boral Limited for $24.25 per share)
  • MSTX +15.6% (announced it has received several written indications of interest from privately-held companies)
  • LOCK +14.6% (to be acquired for $24 per share by Symantec (SYMC))
  • AMCC +10.3% (to be acquired by MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI) for approx. $8.36/share)
Select shipping related names showing continued strength: RLOG +13.8%, DRYS +8.4%, DCIX +6.7%, ATW +6%

Select metals/mining stocks trading higher:
  • VALE +4.3%, GFI +3.1%, FCX +3%, AU +2.6%, AUY +2.6%, BBL +2.3%, GOLD +2%, BHP +1.9%, RIO +1.9%, NEM+1.6%, KGC +1.5%, ABX +1.3%, GDX +1.2%
Select oil/gas related names showing strength: CHK +4.4%, PBR +3.8%, WLL +3.5%, OAS +3%, BP +2%, TOT +1.7%

Other news:
  • LVS +2.1% (still checking, but may be in sympathy with MPEL upgrade)
  • OMER +1.4% (announces 'successful' results from its post-marketing clinical trial of the effect of OMIDRIA 1% / 0.3% in pediatric patients undergoing cataract surgery)
  • FB +1.2% (discloses $6.0 billion stock buyback)
  • C +0.8% (will increase its common stock repurchase program by up to $1.75 billion)
Analyst comments:
  • ZTO +3.2% (initiated with a Overweight at Morgan Stanley)
  • MPEL +2.8% (upgraded to Outperform at Credit Suisse)
  • CNX +2% (upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley)
  • HSBC +1.5% (upgraded to Market Perform from Underperform at Bernstein)
  • MPWR +1.4% (upgraded to Strong Buy from Outperform at Raymond James)
  • NFLX +0.9% (initiated with a Buy at Brean Capital)

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to disappointing earnings/guidance
:
  • TSN -9.2%, CSIQ -1.9%
M&A news:
  • AIXG -5.5% (CFIUS plans to recommend that the company's pending acquisition by Grand Chip Investment be prohibited)
Other news:
  • ACOR -13.1% (announces that the MILESTONE clinical study did not show sufficient efficacy to support further development of dalfampridine to improve post-stroke walking difficulties)
  • SAFM -5.4% (in sympathy with TSN)
  • PPC -4.4% (in sympathy with TSN)
  • IBN -1.5% (in tandem with Sensex, which closed -1.5% today)
Analyst comments:
  • CEMP -4.1% (downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at Cowen)
  • AMFW -3% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Exane BNP Paribas)
  • ANF -1.7% (downgraded to Underperform at RBC Capital Mkts)
  • MMM -1.2% (downgraded to Sell from Neutral at Goldman)

(BofA-ML) European Banks : Contingent Capital : Paint it black

Still like the dated cocos
We like dated contingent capital and take the opportunity to reiterate our Overweight recommendations on the Credit Agricole 8.125% and UBS 4.75%, and upgrade Barclays 7.75% to Overweight. With their 2018 calls, we find the short time to redemption attractive at this point. Relative value is also attractive, in our view. We like securities where the bank is heavily incentivised to redeem as here: there is no real spot for T2 cocos in the regulatory capital architecture today. Thus, these banks, all with pristine track records in terms of calls by the way, should we think replace either with cheaper T2 (Barclays, CredAg) or with senior TLAC (UBS). The proximity to the call should also anchor valuations, we think.

>>> Unicredit's Pioneer Investments may initiate exclusive talks on 22 November

Unicredit's Pioneer Investments may initiate exclusive talks on 22 November - reports


Unicredit’s [BIT:UCG] asset manager Pioneer Investments could enter into exclusive talks by tomorrow Tuesday (22 November), a newswire reported, citing a local press report.
According to Reuters, Amundi of France and PosteItaliane [BIT:PST], are the front-runners with offers amounting to EUR 3.2bn - EUR 3.5bn.
The report went on to say that Pioneer may share EUR 320m in extraordinary dividend prior to its sale.
Another newswire reported that Aberdeen Asset Management had withdrawn itself from UniCredit’s auction because it found the EUR 3.5bn price tag as too high. Aberdeen CEO Martin Gilbert told Bloomberg in an interview that the fund had gone into the second round before leaving the process.
Aberdeen is actively seeking a suitable target, Gilbert added.
Bidders for Pioneer, beside Amundi of France and Poste Italiane in alliance with Anima Holding [BIT:ANIM], and state-owned lender Cassa Depositi e Prestiti (Cdp), include the Australian financial conglomerate Macquarie [ASX: MQG] and Ameriprise Financial [NYSE: AMP] the report added, citing a source privy to the process.

(GS) How S&P500 firms will spend $2.6trillion of Cash in 2017 (pdf attached)

* S&P 500 firms will increase total cash use by 12% in 2017. 
We forecast S&P 500 firms will spend $2.6 trillion next year, allocating 52% to investing for growth (capex, R&D, and M&A) and 48% to returning cash to shareholders (buybacks and dividends). Cash balances currently stand at historical highs, totaling $1.6 trillion (ex-Financials) or 12% of assets compared with a long-term average of 7%.

* Share buybacks will rise by 30% to $780 billion in 2017.
Corporate tax reform will contribute to the sharp rise in share repurchases. We estimate $150 billion or 20% of total buybacks will be driven by repatriated overseas cash. Excluding the repatriation boost, buybacks will rise by 5%. We forecast dividend growth of 6%.

* Capex will rise by 6% to $710 billion as Energy capital spending stabilizes.
Energy accounts for 19% of S&P 500 capex following a 45% plunge in spending since 2014. We forecast 1% growth in Energy capex next year. S&P 500 ex- Energy capex will rise by 7% in 2017. R&D spending will grow by 7% to $290
billion led by Information Technology and Health Care. We expect cash spending on M&A will rise by 5% to $335 billion following a 20% plunge in 2016.

>>> Mediaset, Sky Italia in talks over Premium deal

Mediaset, Sky Italia in talks over Premium deal 
Italian broadcaster Mediaset and pay-TV rival Sky Italia are in contact over a potential agreement involving Mediaset's pay-TV unit Premium after its aborted sale to Vivendi, according to two unnamed sources cited by Reuters. "There has been contact to understand what to do beyond 2018," said one source, referring to the need to submit a joint bid for costly Champions League and Serie A football rights that expire in 2018 and are due for auction in the first half of 2017. However, the parties can’t begin formal talks until Mediaset and France’s Vivendi resolve their legal battle over their collapsed deal, added another source.
In that regard, Mediaset has announced that it’s dropped an urgent request for a court to order the seizure of a 3.5 percent stake in Vivendi just before the first hearing due on 23 November. In a statement Mediaset said it had received assurances that its contractual rights wouldn’t be jeopardised but would still continue with its separate legal action against Vivendi on grounds of the significant potential damages to its business arising from Vivendi’s decision to abort the original sale agreement.

(MAKOR) - Share Class Report


 

MAKOR - Share Class Report

 

Over past week, we didn’t implement any trades but we’re happy with the recent trades we pushed:

 

• The short TITR / TIT is up 165 bps over the past week, we think this can continue

 

• The RDSA / B is up 32 bps. We continue to like this spread, as a value with catalyst one. 

 

• The RYAAY US vs RYA also did ok (+80 bps), we ‘re getting close to unwind levels (109% and above).

 

 

This week, we’d refocus on the UHR / UHRN.

 

• We think the spread is coming back to setup levels.

 

• Swatch has been clearly a massive underperformer over the medium term vs Richemont, LVMH or even Kering.

 

• We estimate the odds of a rebound of Swatch share price are significant, hence UHR’s move should be quicker and bigger than UHRN’s (less liquid)

 

Have a great start of week, 

 

 

 

  

  ​     ​     ​

 

Makor Capital

 

11 Menachem Begin St., 26th FL

Ramat Gan 52681
ISRAEL
Tel         +972 3 5453 762

Fax        +972 3 7162 680

 

   

Research Disclaimer

 

This publication has been prepared by Makor Capital Limited (“Makor Capital”) and is intended for professional or qualified investors only. Makor Securities London Ltd (“Makor Securities”)is distributing this material to its clients who are Eligible Counterparties or Professional Clients under FCA Rules. It may also be disseminated to persons who are Investment Professionals within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion Order 2005).  In the United States, Makor Capital only distributes this material to major US institutional investors (as that term is defined in Rule 15a-6 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) and to SEC-registered broker-dealers or  banks acting in a broker–dealer capacity. This material is not intended for distribution to any other persons and should not be redistributed.  If you do not fall into any of these categories you should disregard it.

 

This material is a marketing communication.  It is not investment research and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. It is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research under U.K. law. This material is not a research report and is not intended to be a research report as defined under U.S. securities laws and regulations.  This material is not intended to provide information reasonably sufficient upon which to base any investment decision.   

 

This material does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual clients or other recipients. Before acting on this material, clients and other recipients should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. 

 

This material should not be construed in any circumstances as an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any security or other financial instrument, nor shall it, or the fact of its distribution, form the basis of, or be relied upon in connection with, any contract relating to such action. 

 

In the United States, Makor Capital does not offer securities services to U.S. persons except pursuant to SEC Rule 15a-6 only to major US institutional investors and SEC registered broker-dealers or  banks acting in a broker–dealer capacity. Transactions in the United States must be effected through the U.S. broker-dealer, Oscar Gruss & Son Incorporated. Oscar Gruss & Son has not prepared, reviewed or distributed this material.

 

Some of this material is produced by providers which Makor Securities believes to be reliable, but Makor Securities does not warrant or represent (expressly or impliedly) that it is accurate, complete, not misleading or as to its fitness for the purpose intended and it should not be relied upon as such. 

Opinions expressed will be the current opinions of those producing this material as of the date appearing on this material only. We expect those producing the material in  this publication to update it on a timely basis but can give no undertaking that they will do so and regulatory compliance or other reasons may prevent  them from doing so (or us from disseminating updated material).  

 

Members and employees of Makor Securities London Ltd, employees of Makor Capital, Makor Capital Markets may from time to time have long or short positions in securities, warrants, futures, options, derivatives or other financial instruments referred to in this material. For Makor Securities, this information is set out in our Conflicts of Interest Policy which is available on request.  Policies for the production of research from other research providers are available on request.  Unless otherwise stated, share prices provided within this material are as at the close of business on the day prior to the date of the material.

 

Neither the whole nor any part of this material may be duplicated in any form or by any means. Neither should any of this material be redistributed or disclosed to anyone without prior consent. This material is issued for general information and discussion purposes only. None of  Makor Securities, Makor Capital, Makor Capital Markets accepts  liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any of this material. 

 

The services, securities and investments discussed in this material may not be available to, nor are suitable for all investors. Investors should make their own investment decisions based upon their own financial objectives and financial resources and it should be noted that investment involves risk, including the risk of capital loss. Past performance is no guide to future performance. In relation to securities denominated in foreign currency, movements in exchange rates will have an effect on the value, either favourable or unfavourable.

 

All investors. Investors should make their own investment decisions based upon their own financial objectives and financial resources and it should be noted that investment involves risk, including the risk of capital loss. Past performance is no guide to future performance. In relation to securities denominated in foreign currency, movements in exchange rates will have an effect on the value, either favourable or unfavourable.

 

Entities

 

Makor Securities London Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct

Authority (FCA registration number 625054) 

 

Makor Capital, company number 514456466, is incorporated in Israel and is a 100% held

subsidiary of Makor Holdings Pte Ltd incorporated in Singapore. 

 

Makor Capital Markets SA, company number CH-660.2.999.011-0 is incorporated in Switzerland

and is also a 100% held subsidiary of Makor Holdings Pte Ltd.

 


Having trouble viewing this email? Click here


This email was sent to lchekroun@makor-cm.com by Research@Makor-Capital.com

Update Profile/Email Address | Unsubscribe | Report abuse


 V.I.Plus e-mail marketing

 

FT : Study finds active global equity funds outperform

Study finds active global equity funds outperform
Research shows international stockpickers beat the market by 1.2 per cent annually

Portfolio managers who promise expertise in actively selecting shares have long been accused of failing to beat the performance of cheaper funds that track an index, but a new study argues that some stockpickers do add value.

According to academic research seen by FTfm, actively managed global equity funds outperformed the market by between 1.2 per cent and 1.4 per cent annually on average between 2002 and 2012.

The findings are likely to provide comfort for some active fund managers who have come under repeated attack from academics, campaigners and research providers for underperforming their benchmarks.

Earlier this year, research by S&P Dow Jones, the index provider, found that 99 per cent of actively managed US equity funds sold in Europe failed to beat the S&P 500 over the past 10 years.

However, the authors of the latest research, which will be published online today, argued that in specific circumstances active management can pay off.

They wrote: “Our results suggest that active management is worth considering in global equity markets.”

The research did not subtract the fees investors are charged from the performance figures, but it said pension funds and other big investors typically pay fees of around 0.75 per cent. This would leave those investors with a net gain of at least 0.45 per cent annually over 10 years.

Retail investors often pay higher fees.

David Gallagher, lead author of the study and a professor at the Australia Business School at the University of New South Wales, said the study shows active equity funds that invest globally “generate an economically significant outperformance”.

According to the study, the excess returns of global equity funds primarily came from managers’ stock selection skills, while allocations to emerging markets also helped boost performance.

Professor David Blake, director of the Pensions Institute at London’s Cass Business School, said he was “a little surprised by the results, in particular the size of the outperformance”, but he cautioned that the study could be prone to so-called selection bias — where only good funds report their performance.

Prof Gallagher’s study, which was co-written by Graham Harman, Camille Schmidt and Geoffrey Warren, included 143 global equity funds that were managed for institutional investors. The funds were assigned a benchmark of either the MSCI World index or the MSCI All Country World index.

Tim Edwards, senior director of index investment strategy at S&P Global, said: “If you have the ability to pick a skilful manager and they are going to charge you a low fee, then that is clearly a better option.

“But there are two big challenges. In most markets the average manager is not enough. Most of the time you have to have a good one and it is often really hard to find a good manager. You also need to have a low fee for this to work. You can’t ignore fees.”

S&P’s research found that few global equity funds available for retail investors outperform the market after fees.

The index provider’s research, as well as numerous academic studies, have heaped pressure on active managers and driven the rapid growth of the passive fund industry, which can provide lower-cost exposure to markets, in recent years.

Figures from Morningstar, the data provider, showed that, in the nine months to the end of September, investors put $35bn into passive equity funds that invest globally but pulled almost $20bn from actively managed equivalents.

Stephen Mitchell, head of strategy for global equities at Jupiter, the UK-listed fund manager, agreed investors benefit from active stock picking when it comes to global equity funds.

“Active management has had a relatively bad press. But we still believe that stock picking is key to active management and it will add value,” he said.

WSJ : Why Saudi Arabia’s Oil Giant Aims to Be Big in Chemicals, Too

Why Saudi Arabia’s Oil Giant Aims to Be Big in Chemicals, Too
Aramco’s plans to vastly expand its petrochemical operations are part of the kingdom’s effort to remake its economy as oil’s future clouds

GELEEN, Netherlands—Saudi Arabian Oil Co. has been the world’s single largest crude producer for decades. It wants to be a lot more than that now, as a new petrochemical complex shows.
Among the Dutch corn fields here is a tangle of pipes, vats and catalyzers that the company uses in its Arlanxeo plant to transform what was oil into synthetic rubber for products ranging from auto-engine hoses to plastic wine corks.
Aramco, as it is commonly known, until recently focused on pumping great quantities of oil and, like the Standard Oil companies of John D. Rockefeller, processing it through its refineries. Aramco now aims to vastly expand its petrochemical operations, turning itself into a modern integrated energy company along the lines of Exxon MobilCorp.

Thousands of miles away, near the Saudi Arabian city of Al Jubail on the Persian Gulf, an army of workers is finishing the $20 billion Sadara petrochemical complex, an Aramco joint venture with Dow Chemical Co. Sadara will use ethane refined by Aramco nearby to make a petrochemical called butadiene to ship world-wide to facilities, likely including its Dutch plant.

Saudi Arabia oil productionSaudi government takes control of its domestic oil industry by purchasing a 25% stake in Aramco, which it increases to 60% in 1974.

Aramco, one of the world’s most powerful and secretive companies, is undergoing an unprecedented makeover, as the oil-price rout hurts its revenue and uncertainty clouds the future of fossil-fuel demand.
Its transformation is intertwined with a long-term plan to diversify the Saudi economy. That plan, led by a powerful deputy crown prince who wants his nation to grow beyond being a petrostate, is accelerating the Aramco shift in ways now becoming clear. By positioning the company to generate more domestic jobs and non-oil revenue, Aramco aims to help provide the funding needed to carry out the prince’s vision.
Aramco’s strategic goal is to create a global network of refining and petrochemical plants that let Saudi Arabia turn its biggest asset into hundreds of higher-value products crucial to modern life, from chewing gum to auto parts.
To extract capital from oil still in the ground, Aramco plans another ambitious gambit: an initial public offering in 2018 that may become history’s biggest. Aramco says it has 261.6 billion barrels of oil left to pump, roughly 20 times as much as Exxon Mobil.
“Aramco’s capabilities will be fully unleashed,” Saudi oil minister and Aramco Chairman Khalid al-Falih said in a briefing with several reporters this year. “The company will be able to go global in multiple ways.”
Khalid Al-Falih, Saudi Arabia's oil minister and Aramco’s chairman, attended a September forum in Tokyo on the kingdom’s plan to diversify its economy. PHOTO:TOMOHIRO OHSUMI/BLOOMBERG NEWS
Aramco declined to answer detailed questions, referring instead to speeches such as one by Aramco Chief Executive Amin Nasser in September. He signaled why the company was interested in a growing petrochemical industry. He said the Gulf region was home to only 2.5% of global petrochemical revenue and less than 1% of the industry’s jobs.
“Considering the Gulf’s endowment of oil and gas, as well as our geographic proximity to major markets in Europe and Asia,” he said, “both those figures should be much, much higher.”
New jobs, revenue
Aramco’s moves position it for a future when crude demand may peak and when owning reserves won’t be as attractive. Even if electric-vehicle adoption and alternative-fuel use soar, cutting global thirst for fuel, demand for petrochemicals is likely to remain strong. By developing more chemical manufacturing of its own, Aramco could attract jobs and revenue to the kingdom, which recently issued $17.5 billion in bonds to shore up its finances.

Aramco’s reinvention as a public company invested in producing gasoline, diesel and specialty chemicals could mean abdicating Saudi Arabia’s traditional role as de facto head of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Historically, the kingdom, through Aramco, has opened the spigot when prices rise too high and restricted supply when they fall too far. To do this, Aramco has kept unused spare production capacity, which shareholders would frown on, say some oil-industry consultants.
It isn’t clear how much of the change will come to pass at Aramco or in the Saudi economy. The government relies on oil for the vast majority of its revenue and has for decades talked about needing to diversify, without much change.
Richard Mallinson at Energy Aspects, a London global-energy-market consultant, says he thinks the diversification plan “will fall a long way short of the lofty ambitions” and “is just too much of a jump from where they are today.”
The strategy of directly owning more petrochemical plants to create outlets for crude and refined products has long been pursued by large firms such as Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell PLC. “Aramco is the powerhouse in the area of oil. They want to get bigger in chemistry,” says Matthias Zachert, chairman of Aramco’s German joint-venture partner Lanxess AG. “But you don’t create a leading chemical company overnight.”

Several advisers involved in the IPO planning say the transformation will be so complex it could go beyond 2018. The 5% stake targeted for the IPO is so large—Aramco has been valued at $2 trillion to $3 trillion—that finding a deep enough pool of investors may require Aramco to float the stock on several stock exchanges and to face multiple sets financial-disclosure rules, they say. It is a special challenge for bankers, they say, because the company and the kingdom are so deeply intertwined in ways that aren’t public.
A prince’s role
The company has said it will begin disclosing financial statements in 2017. Its operations are shrouded in secrecy and wouldn't meet governance requirements of most exchanges, such as board diversity. Its board includes no women and few outsiders.
King Salman bin Abdulaziz has already shaken up the kingdom’s ruling elite by empowering his son, Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman. Prince Mohammed is moving ahead with a plan drawn up by McKinsey & Co. consultants to wean the country off its oil dependence. In May, he proposed the IPO and the transfer of proceeds to a sovereign-wealth fund that will invest in other sectors.
Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is moving ahead with a plan to wean Saudi Arabia off its oil dependence. PHOTO: CHARLES PLATIAU/REUTERS
By taking on the transformation, the 31-year-old Prince Mohammed is challenging the established order in ways that could prove difficult to implement, say people close to the current establishment. Even giving shareholders partial control over Saudi Arabia’s oil reserves would be tough because taking control of those assets was a defining moment for the kingdom.
The prince is working with Mr. Falih, Aramco’s chairman, and a tight circle of advisers to map out the future of Aramco and the Saudi economy, say people familiar with the discussions. They are making many decisions surrounding Aramco with little input from the company’s bureaucracy, these people say.
Members of the company’s board learned of the IPO plans from media reports, rather than from Mr. Falih or Mr. Nasser, Aramco’s CEO, one Aramco official says. “In some occasions even the chief executive is not fully aware of the latest update,” the official says of Mr. Nasser. Aramco didn't make Mr. Nasser, Mr. Falih or other executives available for interviews. A spokesman for the prince declined to comment.
Aramco owns directly or through joint ventures plants capable of processing 5.4 million barrels a day in markets that are its biggest crude customers: the U.S., South Korea, Japan, China and Saudi Arabia.
Making Aramco’s integrated model more lucrative, its operating costs for extracting oil remain among the world’s lowest—perhaps $6 a barrel, compared with an average of $10 in Texas’ Permian Basin, according to oil consultant Wood Mackenzie.
“The idea of control of the end market is very important to them,” says Anas Alhajji, an independent energy economist in Dallas. “This is their outlet to the market.”
Aramco presented an exhibit at a September conference in Bahrain for the refining and petrochemical industries, fields in which the Saudi company is expanding. PHOTO:HAMAD I MOHAMMED/REUTERS
That philosophy led Aramco earlier this year to break up a strategic partnership: Motiva, its two-decade-old joint venture with Shell. A key asset was a Port Arthur, Texas, refinery, North America’s largest.
Motiva had begun buying American crude oil, which was competing with Saudi oil, say people familiar with the Motiva relationship.
Shell spokesman Ray Fisher says ending such a long venture with numerous assets and liabilities is “a very complex process, involving various adjustments and changes along the way before final agreements can be reached.”
The breakup will let Aramco cement its U.S. foothold. From Port Arthur, it could ship gasoline, jet fuel and diesel to military bases in Virginia, airports in the Washington, D.C., area and service stations in New York.
The split will free Aramco from certain limits imposed by the Motiva deal, allowing it to expand, for instance, on the West Coast. The Saudi company has looked at buying a large refinery along the Gulf Coast or a stake in a refinery, say people familiar with the company.
Aramco is negotiating with the Malaysian national oil company, Petronas, to work together on a $21 billion refining-and-petrochemicals project near Singapore, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. The project would operate as a joint venture and serve as another major Asian beachhead for Saudi oil.
Aramco owns a stake in the giant Fujian Refining & Petrochemical complex, supplying oil that is turned into gasoline and plastics for China.
Aramco’s roots
Aramco has its roots in Texaco and Standard Oil of California, which formed a partnership that found enormous oil deposits on the Arabian Peninsula. In the early 1970s, the kingdom bought a stake in Aramco and by the 1980s had acquired it all.
In 1991, Aramco began looking overseas when it bought a stake in a South Korean refiner. In terms that Aramco would repeat, it agreed to supply the refinery with crude for two decades. Over the years, it bought and built more refineries.
Still, Aramco remained a company almost entirely focused on producing crude. The first inklings of a new strategy emerged in 2011 when Aramco and Dow Chemical agreed to create Sadara, among the world’s largest petrochemical complexes.
After signing the deal, Mr. Falih, then Aramco’s CEO, explained his vision. Aramco, he said, will “become the world’s leading integrated energy company by the year 2020.”
Aramco for decades has been the world’s largest crude producer, pumping from oil fields through complexes such as this one in shown in 2003 in Shaybah, Saudi Arabia.PHOTO: REZA/GETTY IMAGES
Saudi Arabian crude sales faced new pressures starting in about 2012 as Nigeria and Angola, forced out of the U.S. market by a flood of shale oil, began competing with Aramco in Asia. Demand was stagnating, and countries were moving to limit fossil-fuel use.
Soon after oil prices began falling in 2014, Mr. Zachert, chairman of Lanxess, the chemical firm, suggested a European deal with Aramco. “They saw the strong strategic rationale,” he says. “The transaction was completed in record time.”
Aramco paid $1.2 billion to Lanxess to cleave off half the German company and create a partnership, Arlanxeo, 50%-owned by Aramco and based in a Netherlands industrial park dubbed Chemelot.
Three Aramco executives moved to Holland to help run a company with 20 factories in Latin America, North America, Europe and Asia. “They’re very interested in how we do things,” says Jan Paul de Vries,the Lanxess executive who heads the venture.
Arlanxeo’s synthetic-rubber facility is a neat fit for the Sadara project, which shipped its first chemicals in December. When fully running, Sadara will be able to supply feedstock to Arlanxeo. The plant is a key link between Aramco’s aspiration of building a petrochemical empire and the kingdom’s diversification plan.
One recent afternoon, workers wearing protective masks painted arrows on new roads near the complex’s edge. Beyond a chain-link fence, trucks lined a half-built road on a patch of desert that is part of a planned five-square-mile industrial park.
The goal is to attract manufacturers that would use Sadara’s chemical output while benefiting from the infrastructure. That would complete a circle, allowing Aramco to use its oil extraction, refining and processing chain to supply more Saudi-based manufacturing—one of eight sectors the economic-diversification plan targets for expansion.
Robert W. Jordan, U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia under PresidentGeorge W. Bush, says changes Aramco is making are preparing the country to depart from the past.
“Saudi Arabia may have enough oil for the oil age,” he says. “But the oil age may be ending.”