FT : Quant hedge funds reap big gains from global bond sell-off

Quant hedge funds reap big gains from global bond sell-off
Trend-following portfolios have latched on to sharp rise in yields this year as Iran war and strong US economic data fuel inflation fears

Computer-driven hedge funds are making big profits out of a rout in global government bonds that has pushed US and European borrowing costs to multi-decade highs.

Funds using computer models to find and latch on to market trends have been running big bets against fixed income this year and have benefited as the Iran war and, more recently, strong US economic data have fuelled investors’ inflation fears.

Yields on 10-year US Treasuries have surged from around 4 per cent at the end of February to more than 5.2 per cent, while French, UK and Italian bonds have also sold off sharply. Yields rise as bond prices fall.

Among funds to benefit is Connecticut-based Graham Capital, whose Tactical Trend fund is up more than 31 per cent so far this year, including a 3.3 per cent gain last month, according to two people familiar with the matter.

London-based Winton, founded by billionaire Sir David Harding, gained 17.5 per cent in the year to last Friday in its Diversified Macro fund, while Aspect Capital’s flagship fund is up 21 per cent so far this year and gained almost 5 per cent last month, according to people who have seen the numbers.

“The embers of inflation are still glowing red,” said a director at one quant fund. “From about July onwards our risk has been pointed towards bonds, energy and currencies.”

All three funds make bets across asset classes and have made gains in other areas too. For instance, both Winton and Aspect made money by betting on energy markets, as the Iran war has kept oil prices stubbornly high.

Driving the surge in global bond yields and expectations of interest rate rises this year have been soaring crude prices, with benchmark Brent crude up around 40 per cent since the war began in February.

Fading hopes for a negotiated end to the Iran conflict have ignited a fresh burst higher in crude prices in recent weeks. Brent settled at $102.31 on Thursday.

The Federal Reserve increased its policy rate last month for the first time since 2023, responding to a jolt higher in inflation, and the European Central Bank has raised rates twice, while the Bank of England is expected by traders to follow suit in the coming months.

The inflationary impact of the war has been compounded by resilient US economic data that has stoked bets on higher US rates, while concerns over record government and corporate debt sales have meant investors demanding ever-higher yields to lend over the long term.

Rising yields have also forced some investors to unwind lossmaking positions, which has exacerbated the moves, according to market participants.

Trend funds tend to do best in years where there are clear, persistent trends across several months. One of the best years for the industry was 2022 when central banks kept increasing interest rates to fight persistent inflation, with quant funds profiting by betting against government bonds.

FT : Amazon seeks to offload $8bn of Nvidia chips to investors The move aims to

Amazon seeks to offload $8bn of Nvidia chips to investors
The move aims to improve the tech group’s balance sheet health as AI spending soars

Amazon is seeking to offload about $8bn of advanced Nvidia chips to external investors through a new vehicle aimed at strengthening its balance sheet, according to people familiar with the matter.

The Seattle-based cloud giant has held talks with investors in recent weeks to gauge interest in the deal, which would allow the company to spin off thousands of Grace Blackwell chips it is deploying in data centres across the US into a special-purpose vehicle.

Amazon will then lease the advanced AI chips back from the SPV, which would tap outside investors through debt issuance. By unloading the expensive semiconductors to investors, the company could adopt a more asset-light approach to its balance sheet.

Amazon declined to comment.

The proposed move comes as tech giants seek creative ways to finance massive spending on data centre infrastructure. Much of the cost associated with the build-out of these facilities is tied to the chips used to train advanced AI models.

Tech companies are pursuing a range of strategies to move debt off their balance sheets to preserve their creditworthiness. They have used residual value guarantees, providing lenders with assurances about the future value of chips or data centres, without borrowing cash to finance projects themselves. The approach has obscured the amount of risk that tech giants are taking on.

Investors expect the entity will receive an investment-grade credit rating based on Amazon’s current double A rating, paving the way for a broader base of investors such as insurance and pension funds to join the deal.

Amazon also plans to offer an equity stake of up to 10 per cent in the vehicle, meaning that it will not own any stakes in the entity. Discussions between Amazon and investors are ongoing and are subject to change, the people added.

Amazon bought or leased the chips involved in the proposed deal and they have been deployed in more than a dozen US data centres across five states, including Nevada and Virginia, the people added.

Nvidia’s Grace Blackwell chips are some of the semiconductor group’s most advanced but will soon be superseded by its latest Vera Rubin offering.

Leading AI labs such as OpenAI and Anthropic — in which Amazon has committed to invest as much as $83bn — use the latest chips to train their models. Previous generations of silicon continue to be used for running applications. Amazon expects each series of semiconductors to last at least five years, according to regulatory filings.

Amazon is expected to spend $220bn in capital expenditure this year, the majority of which will be allocated towards its cloud unit AWS for the purchase of advanced chips and the wider build-out of AI data centres.

The company has tapped the market to help fund this investment. In March it laid out plans to raise about $50bn through corporate bond issuances, increasing the offering from $37bn following strong demand. But it faced weakening interest in long-dated debt when it sold $25bn in bonds in July, with investors demanding higher yields.

Financing backed by graphics processing units has proven popular among companies such as CoreWeave, which have used their ready access to chips to fund borrowing.

In order to lower borrowing costs for its clients, Nvidia in August offered to backstop up to $125bn of such debt through a $500bn financing platform with major Wall Street groups.

FT : Monzo courts private equity after Nubank walks away Eleven-year-old UK fint

Monzo courts private equity after Nubank walks away
Eleven-year-old UK fintech searching for growth capital after bruising year of boardroom tussles

Monzo Bank is stepping up its efforts to court private equity investors after takeover talks with the Brazilian fintech giant Nubank collapsed over the up-to £10bn valuation the UK group was seeking.

The digital bank has in recent weeks held early-stage discussions with the European buyout group CVC and US private equity firm Advent International about selling a significant stake in the group. People familiar with the matter said Monzo was seeking to sell a stake of up to 15 per cent.

They added that a sale to a private equity fund was now the preferred option for Monzo after takeover talks with Nubank fell through and that Monzo’s advisers would turn their efforts to engaging with more fund managers.

Monzo had been trying to clinch a sale to Nubank in a deal that would have valued the UK fintech at £10bn. New York-listed Nubank, which has a market capitalisation of about $65bn, said on Wednesday that it would not be pursuing a deal.

People familiar with the matter said that the sides were unable to agree a price and that Nubank had instead decided to concentrate on growing in its home market and the US, where it has recently secured a banking licence.

Monzo could yet pursue a third option: tapping venture capital investors for a more traditional fundraising round. However, one person familiar with the board’s thinking said Monzo would prefer the private equity option as it would probably be a far larger investment and give Monzo access to more cash for growth.

Monzo, Nubank, Advent and CVC declined to comment.

Monzo has endured a difficult year, with a bruising fight between its board and investors over the company’s international expansion plans and long-awaited initial public offering.

The fintech’s board ousted then-chief executive TS Anil because of concerns about the pace of growth and whether he was committed to the business for the long term — a move that angered the company’s biggest investors.

Anil ultimately remained on the board, but was replaced as CEO by former Google executive Diana Layfield. Since taking the helm in February, Layfield has closed Monzo’s US offices and switched the focus of expansion plans to Europe, opening offices in Spain and securing a European banking licence from Irish authorities. 

Anil — who stayed on as an adviser to Layfield — along with Monzo’s chief financial officer and former Nubank executive Tom Oldham helped broker the takeover talks, according to people familiar with the deliberations.

When asked last month about whether there would be more consolidation among direct-to-consumer fintechs, Oldham demurred. “I’m not sure on the consolidation point,” he told the FT. “I think we’re really just focused on growing our customer base at pace.”

He added: “If we see other great companies that are delivering against one of our customers’ needs, and we think that’s a good cultural fit for us, that’s a company that we like, then for sure we would look.”

But behind the scenes, São Paulo-based Nubank had identified Monzo as providing a potential foothold in Europe.

“You cannot look at the deal without looking at Revolut,” said one senior technology banker of Nubank’s interest in Monzo.

“If you’re looking at it from a financial point of view, the deal doesn’t make sense for anyone. But Monzo as a platform could turbocharge Nubank into developed markets, handing them a banking licence and more customers than Revolut in its own market.”

Although Monzo is a similar age to Revolut, it has long since been overshadowed by its larger rival. Revolut has grown to become a global player with 80mn customers and a $115bn valuation. Monzo reported just 15mn customers this year.

Nubank, which launched in 2013, has 140mn customers. But they are mainly in Latin America, and the company is seeking to take on Nik Storonsky’s Revolut to become the world’s dominant fintech.

Both have already secured US banking licences in recent months, while Revolut has also made moves in Colombia, Mexico and Argentina.

John Cronin, an independent banking analyst, said there were “only two ways” for Nubank to expand in Europe: “You buy your way in . . . or you build organically, which takes ages, and you’re behind in the race versus Monzo, Revolut and others scattered around the continent.”

Nubank’s top executives are aware of the difficulties around European expansion. David Vélez, the company’s billionaire co-founder, told the FT last month that UK growth would be costly and posed its own challenges.

“I would say there are more digital banks, it’s a very big market, [but] you still have access and cost problems . . . there’s still a significant lack of access to certain products, specifically on credit.”

The price tag for Monzo attached to its talks with Nubank had sparked scepticism, however. In a note to clients, equity research company Autonomous labelled the deal “financially questionable”, noting that a valuation of between £8bn and £10bn would be seven times Monzo’s tangible book value, far higher than competitors.

Autonomous added that in the mature UK market, it would be hard to monetise Monzo’s customers to make the transaction pay off. The $9 per month Monzo generates from each customer is only half the monthly average revenue per Brazilian Nubank customer, Autonomous said.

“Nubank would be paying a premium to its own valuation to acquire something that doesn’t generate the same returns as it’s currently generating,” the independent analyst Cronin said.

A venture capital adviser said Monzo and Nubank also served starkly different customers, with Nubank providing lending and banking services to underbanked customers in Latin America.

“Nubank is more mass-market and not necessarily known for higher-value customers. There are not a large number of underbanked people in the UK or Europe.”

But if Nubank balked at Monzo’s desired valuation, private equity firms without the same strategic rationale for a deal or operations to merge were likely to be even more price sensitive, making a deal difficult to pull off.

That could mean that rather than cashing out via a sale to Nubank, Monzo’s existing investors have to inject more cash into the UK fintech to fund its growth plans in pursuit of an exit at a later date.

Still, speaking to the FT last month, Oldham seemed unperturbed. “We’re super hopeful about bringing that sort of Monzo magic, as we like to say, to other markets,” he said.

>>> NIKE beats by $0.04, reports revs in-line; guides FY27 EPS below consensus

NIKE beats by $0.04, reports revs in-line; guides FY27 EPS below consensus; FY27 revenue expected to decline high-single digits (35.15 -0.25)
  • Reports Q1 (Aug) earnings of $0.48 per share, $0.04 better than the FactSet Consensus of $0.44; revenues fell 4.3% year/year to $11.21 bln vs the $11.32 bln FactSet Consensus.
    • NIKE Brand revenues were $11.0 billion, down 4 percent on a reported and currency-neutral basis, primarily due to declines in Greater China and EMEA, partially offset by growth in North America.
    • NIKE Brand wholesale revenues were $6.8 billion, down 1 percent on a reported and currency-neutral basis, primarily due to declines in Greater China, partially offset by growth in North America.
    • NIKE Direct revenues were $4.1 billion, down 8 percent on a reported basis and down 9 percent on a currency-neutral basis, due to a 13 percent decrease in NIKE Brand Digital and a 5 percent decrease in NIKE-owned stores.
    • Revenues for Converse were $263 million, down 28 percent on a reported and currency-neutral basis, due to declines across all territories.
    • Gross margin expanded 60 basis points to 42.8 percent, primarily due to lower warehousing and logistics costs.
    • Inventories for NIKE, Inc. were $7.8 billion, down 3 percent, primarily reflecting shifts in product mix.
  • Co issues downside guidance for FY27, sees EPS of $1.15-1.35, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $1.67 FactSet Consensus. Revenues are expected to decline high-single digits in fiscal 2027.


--> NIKE reveals Pace operating model transformation
  • Pace is an operating model transformation to accelerate and scale the success of the Sport Offense. The program includes and builds upon the previous cost realignment plan announced in March 2026. Pace includes efforts to modernize NIKE's global supply chain, the establishment of a new campus in India to fuel its enterprise capabilities, a realignment to three geographies, and further streamlining of the organization to reduce costs.
  • NIKE expects Pace to deliver approximately $2.5 billion in cumulative savings through fiscal 2031, with approximately $1.0 billion of pre-tax charges, primarily consisting of employee-related costs, through fiscal 2031, in addition to approximately $0.3 billion of severance costs recognized in fiscal 2026. NIKE expects approximately $0.3 billion to be recognized in fiscal 2027.

On Call : NIKE guidance commentary on call
  • Co currently expects revenues to decline in the high single digit range. Co is making deliberate choices across portions of the portfolio, particularly in Nike sportswear, the Jordan brand and Greater China to improve the health of these businesses over time.
  • Co will continue to take actions to reduce supply across key parts of the marketplace in support of a healthier marketplace environment and stronger full price realization. Co expects those actions will create pressure on reported revenues for for the remainder of fiscal 27 and into 28.
  • Co currently expects Ebit to decline by a greater percentage than revenue. This outlook reflects continued pressure on gross margin and fixed cost deleverage associated with lower revenue levels.

---> Q1 2027 NKE Earnings Call Guidance
  • For fiscal 2027, revenues are expected to decline in the high single-digit range YOY, with deliberate supply reductions in NIKE Sportswear, Jordan Brand, and Greater China creating pressure on reported revenues for the remainder of fiscal 2027 and into 2028; Q2 revenues will face an approximate 400 basis point headwind from lapping prior-year EMEA Cyber Week promotions and higher North America sell-in.
  • For fiscal 2027, EBIT is expected to decline by a greater percentage than revenue, reflecting continued pressure on gross margin and fixed cost deleverage associated with lower revenue levels, partially offset by disciplined expense management.
  • For fiscal 2027, adjusted EPS is expected to be in the range of $1.15 to $1.35, excluding approximately $0.15 of impact from the Pace program.
  • FactSet FY27 EPS consensus is $1.67.

Full Q1 2027 NKE Earnings Call Summary
Date of Call: October 1, 2026
Financials Results:
  • Q1 revenue was $11.2B, down 4% reported and 5% currency-neutral YOY.
  • By geography: Greater China revenue declined 26% YOY; EMEA declined 5% YOY; APLA was flat YOY; North America grew 2% YOY.
  • NIKE Sportswear, which accounted for just under half of quarterly revenue, declined low double-digits YOY.
  • Jordan Brand represented 13% of global business in Q1, with revenue falling by mid-teens YOY.
  • NIKE performance business grew high single-digits YOY; excluding the reset in Greater China, NIKE performance would have been up low double-digits YOY.
  • Performance growth was driven by double-digit increases in running, global football, tennis, and golf; basketball was up double-digits in North America.
  • Gross margin was 42.8%, up 60 basis points YOY.
  • SG&A declined 3% YOY on a reported basis.
  • EPS was $0.48, down 2% versus last year.
  • Company entered the quarter in a net cash position with $8.4B in cash and short-term investments and leverage at roughly 2x.
  • Returned approximately $610M to shareholders through dividends in the quarter.
  • NIKE performance portfolio reached $16B last fiscal year and grew high single-digits in Q1.
  • World Cup-related performance: World Cup team kits sales doubled versus the 2022 tournament; club football kits were up high-teens YOY.
Guidance:
  • For fiscal 2027, revenues are expected to decline in the high single-digit range YOY, with deliberate supply reductions in NIKE Sportswear, Jordan Brand, and Greater China creating pressure on reported revenues for the remainder of fiscal 2027 and into 2028; Q2 revenues will face an approximate 400 basis point headwind from lapping prior-year EMEA Cyber Week promotions and higher North America sell-in.
  • For fiscal 2027, EBIT is expected to decline by a greater percentage than revenue, reflecting continued pressure on gross margin and fixed cost deleverage associated with lower revenue levels, partially offset by disciplined expense management.
  • For fiscal 2027, adjusted EPS is expected to be in the range of $1.15 to $1.35, excluding approximately $0.15 of impact from the Pace program.
🖋️ Business Commentary:
  • Management emphasized a “Sport Offense” strategy, with NIKE performance categories (running, global football, training, basketball, tennis, golf) delivering strong double-digit growth in multiple sports, but not yet large enough to offset pressure in Sportswear, Jordan Brand, and Greater China.
  • NIKE Sportswear weakness was attributed to deliberate pullbacks (nearly 50% reduction in “dock” revenue, creating a ~$200M headwind), product underperformance, and broader lifestyle marketplace softness; management is segmenting Sportswear around distinct consumer groups to avoid a “sea of sameness” and build a deeper bench of winning franchises.
  • Jordan Brand is being repositioned by restoring scarcity in retro product; NIKE acknowledged oversupplying iconic retros and plans to deliberately reduce volume and frequency of specific launches, with North America seeing the largest near-term impact, to support more profitable and sustainable growth.
  • Greater China is undergoing a structural reset: revenue declined 26% as NIKE cleans up digital distribution, exits channels misaligned with its strategy, and concentrates on official NIKE and Jordan flagships on Tmall, JD, Douyin, nike.com, and the NIKE app; this is expected to pressure revenues and profitability for multiple seasons while improving brand premium and inventory health.
  • Physical retail in Greater China is being upgraded after years without refresh; Shanghai House of Innovation has delivered 10 consecutive months of growth after elevating the experience and leading with sport.
  • Running momentum is supported by innovation in Max Cushioning (Vomero franchise nearly tripled share of the category over the past year) and a slate of new products (Pegasus Plus 2, Alphafly 4, Swooshfly, Nike Apex) targeted at specific runner types, distances, and goals.
  • Global football benefited from World Cup energy and a refreshed marketplace, driving strong double-digit growth across all four geographies and high-teens growth in club kits, with a strategy to convert event-driven demand into recurring club-level purchases.
  • Training is highlighted as a major untapped opportunity, with strong performance from Nike Mind, Nike Pro, Metcon, and the new Nike Hybrid footwear system for hybrid training; recovery innovation is being broadened via the Hyperslide from the Nike x Hyperice partnership.
  • Women’s basketball is a key growth vector: women’s signature business grew nearly 500% from FY 2022 to FY 2026; the Caitlin 1 is NIKE’s largest women’s signature launch ever, rolling out in 5,000 doors (twice the typical signature distribution) and anchoring the holiday product campaign.
  • The “Pace” program is a multi-year operating model transformation aimed at accelerating the Sport Offense, improving speed-to-market, streamlining decisions, and lowering the cost base; it targets approximately $2.5B in savings, with about $1B in implementation costs over the program’s life in addition to ~$300M of severance costs in fiscal 2026, and majority of savings expected in FY 2029–2030, continuing into FY 2031.
  • Pace includes evolving the supply chain from a mostly fixed to a more flexible and responsive structure, establishing a new campus in Bengaluru, India to drive capabilities and operational excellence, and reorganizing into three geographies (Americas, APGC, EMEA) with fewer layers and more local decision-making, expected to be in place in FY 2028.
  • Workforce structure will change under Pace, with some capabilities added and duplicative roles eliminated, ultimately reducing the overall number of roles while freeing capacity to invest in consumer-facing innovation and brand strength.
  • Management reiterated a disciplined capital allocation framework, prioritizing investments that strengthen the business and improve returns, while maintaining the dividend as a key component of shareholder returns.
  • NIKE highlighted on-the-ground activations (e.g., University of Texas vs. Ohio State) as examples of “surrounding a moment” by integrating running, training, football, Sportswear, NIL programs, and retail partners to deepen local relevance and leverage its extensive university partnership network.
Sentiment Analysis:
  • Prepared remarks: Tone acknowledged that “results have fallen short of expectations” and that “our results are below both our expectations and our potential,” while emphasizing that Q1 was “in line with our expectations” and that the Sport Offense is “delivering measurable progress.” Management repeatedly framed current actions in terms of “deliberate choices,” “discipline and urgency,” and “building NIKE the right way for the long term,” signaling willingness to accept near-term revenue and margin pressure to restore brand health and premium positioning.
  • Q&A tone: Not directly observable from the provided excerpt, but the setup before Q&A stressed a desire to give investors a “clear framework” and to update full-year expectations over time, suggesting an intent to be more transparent and grounded in “realities of the business” during questioning.
  • Note any sentiment shift: Across the prepared remarks, there is a contrast between candid recognition of “significant work ahead” in Sportswear, Jordan, and Greater China and more upbeat language around performance categories, innovation pipelines, and the Pace program’s long-term benefits. The narrative shifts from near-term caution (high single-digit revenue decline, EBIT down more than revenue) to longer-term opportunity, with management positioning current resets and cost actions as necessary steps to “restore the business to stronger financial health” and “unlock new growth opportunities.”
Q&A:
Question from Simeon Siegel (Guggenheim Securities): Asked for sizing of performance vs. Sportswear and Jordan in the U.S. to reconcile mixed category commentary with North America revenue and EBIT margin inflection, and then asked Dave to comment on his confidence in the guidance and how much he has been able to learn so far.
Response: Management said the sport offense is working, with performance delivering broad-based high single-digit growth in Q1 across all key sports and driving North America’s 2% growth, supported by strong sell-through across channels; they highlighted innovation, aligned execution by sport and country, and recent launches as proof points. Dave added that guidance reflects a bottoms-up, comprehensive business and financial plan review incorporating current trends, risks, and actions, and that he feels very confident in the earnings range and the organization’s accountability for delivering both this year and over the long term.
Question from Brooke Roach (Goldman Sachs): Asked for more detail on the magnitude and cadence of expected pressure in Greater China relative to the 26% Q1 decline, and whether further strategic actions beyond the NIKE Digital reset are needed to improve the business.
Response: Management said they are in the midst of a marketplace reset in China aimed at becoming more premium and culturally relevant, with sport-led categories like Running growing double digits and benefiting from localized experiences, while they aggressively clean up and elevate both digital and physical distribution and invest in local product creation. They cautioned that revenue and profitability in China will remain under pressure near term as they eliminate unprofitable, brand-dilutive channels and reset assortments, and Dave specified that their guidance assumes China revenue gets worse for the balance of the year to ensure a healthier long-term business.
Question from Jay Sole (UBS Securities): Sought more specific help on Q2 revenue and gross margin expectations beyond the 400 bps headwind comment, and asked where gross margin might land for fiscal 2027 given SG&A is guided down year-over-year and an unusual Q4 compare.
Response: Dave said they are not providing specific gross margin guidance for the year but noted constructive tailwinds from supply chain and sourcing initiatives that bolster margin, offset by discounts and marketplace resets that dampen it, creating a push-pull dynamic. For Q2, he highlighted tough comparisons to last year’s Cyber Week in Europe and North America sale activity, which will pressure sequential growth rates, and indicated that this is the main lens through which to view Q2 performance.
Question from Bob Drbul (BTIG): Asked for more color on the decision to let Kylian Mbappé leave the NIKE roster and for greater clarity on the basketball game plan, particularly around signature basketball and the addition of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.
Response: Management said they are proud of their two-decade relationship and shared achievements with Mbappé, wish him well, and remain confident in NIKE Football given its strong athlete, federation, and product portfolio. On basketball, they emphasized a strategy to “dimensionalize” the category across men’s and women’s, citing explosive growth in women’s basketball, the record Caitlin Clark signature launch at 5000 doors, the SHAI 002 launch, and the GT series, and noted they are already seeing basketball growth in North America as a performance opportunity.
Question from Sam Poser (Williams Trading): Asked three things: regional sales expectations for the year relative to Q1, targeted speed-to-market improvements under the PACE project (currently around 18 months), and whether most sub-$100 “family channel” product is in Sportswear.
Response: Management explained that core “family footwear” spans entry-level product across Running, Basketball, Training, and Sportswear in the $65–$85 range and is not limited to Sportswear, with teams making good progress there. On PACE, they described it as an operating model shift to scale the sport offense by getting closer to athletes and markets via supply chain work, a new India capability center, moving from four to three geographies, and reshaping the workforce, with more detail to come at Investor Day; Dave added that PACE is designed to increase operating profit leverage over time and that while they won’t give regional guidance, actions in China will further dampen that region’s growth versus Q1 for the rest of the year.
Question from Alex Straton (Morgan Stanley): Asked Elliott to reflect on what he may have underappreciated about challenges in Jordan, China, and Sportswear since his return, given limited progress and some worsening, and what gives him confidence that the revised strategies outlined now are the right ones.
Response: Elliott said they have strengthened NIKE’s foundation and clarified its long-term direction, but that a turnaround at their scale is an ongoing, granular process requiring time and resource reallocation. He acknowledged underappreciating the need to break Sportswear into distinct consumer segments, outlined efforts to reposition Jordan by restoring retro scarcity and expanding into performance sports, and described China actions focused on sport-led innovation and decisive marketplace cleanup, expressing confidence these strategies will build healthier, more durable businesses and promising more detail at Investor Day.
Question from Matthew Boss (JPMorgan): Asked Elliott to elaborate on the “pain before gain” dynamic, including which segments may further moderate due to strategic actions and how long that lasts, and then asked if PACE benefits would show up in the P&L by fiscal 2029.
Response: Dave said deliberate actions in Sportswear, Jordan, and China will dampen performance through the balance of this year and likely into early fiscal 2028, but are necessary to restore business health and drive outsized long-term shareholder value. On PACE, he noted they are already seeing savings, particularly in supply chain-related gross margin improvements, and that while benefits will ramp over time, maximum savings are expected to be realized in 2029 and 2030.
Question from Michael Binetti (Evercore ISI): Asked for clarification on what “multiple seasons” means for the China reset and whether there is a path to total company revenue growth turning positive in fiscal 2028, and then questioned dividend priorities given near-term top-line challenges and a payout ratio that appears above 100% at the guidance midpoint.
Response: Dave stressed that the dividend is a very significant capital allocation priority and that under all scenarios they plan to support maintaining and ultimately growing it over time. On the broader revenue and China questions, he deferred detailed commentary until November, when they will present a multi-year financial algorithm at Investor Day covering top-line and bottom-line expectations for 2027 and the subsequent five years.

>>> After Hours Summary: NKE -6.3% lower on earnings After Hours Gainers: Compa

After Hours Summary: NKE -6.3% lower on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news:SYNA +15.6% (Amended its merger agreement with onsemi to a $123-per-share all-cash deal valued at about $5.7 billion.), ON +6.8% (Revised its Synaptics acquisition to an all-cash $123-per-share deal valued at about $5.7 billion.), THRM +5.9% (Completed the $946.4 million combination with Modine’s Performance Technologies business and declared a $2.07-per-share special dividend.), CHRN +4.1% (Expanded one AI infrastructure contract and added another customer, supporting $1 billion annualized revenue by Q3 2027.), VG +2.9% (Signed a 20-year agreement to supply ConocoPhillips 1 million tonnes of LNG annually beginning in 2030.), WK +2.5% (Will join the S&P SmallCap 600 before trading opens October 6, replacing Formfactor.), CSHR +2.0% (Appoints Matt Morris CFO effective immediately, succeeding Richard Nash in a planned succession.), NYAX +1.9% (Completed the $350 million cash acquisition of IPS Group, expected to be immediately accretive across key profitability metrics.), AOUT +1.6% (Authorized a new $10 million share repurchase program through September 2027.), TWLO +1.3% (Will join the S&P 500 before trading opens October 6, replacing Warner Bros. Discovery.), REPL +1.1% (Made TUDRIQEV commercially available in the U.S. with nivolumab for adults with advanced melanoma after PD-1 progression.), BLZE +1.1% (Expanded its Jamf integration with new deployment workflows for Business Computer Backup in managed Mac environments.), FWDI +1.0% (Increased quarterly SOL holdings 13% to 8.5 million, with fully diluted SOL per share growing 10.4%.)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance:NKE -6.3%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news:VACI -9.3% (Completed business combination with NorthStar Earth & Space, valuing NorthStar at $300 million with a $30 million PIPE.), TRU -1.9% (FHFA plans to cut Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac credit-reporting requirements to two bureaus from three.), YSWY -1.6% (Completed the sale of 29 Iowa and Kansas stores to Now & Forever for approximately $21 million.), DT -1.2% (Completed the acquisition of AI observability and evaluation platform Arize.), AEHL -1.2% (Launches an at-the-market program to sell up to $100 million of Class A ordinary shares.), SGMT -1.2% (Closed a $115 million offering of common shares and pre-funded warrants to fund clinical programs and general purposes.)

WSJ : Barbie-Maker Mattel Draws Takeover Interest From Authentic Brands Group Sh

Barbie-Maker Mattel Draws Takeover Interest From Authentic Brands Group
Shares in the toy maker rose 19% Thursday, after having shed more than a third this year

  • Authentic Brands Group recently expressed takeover interest in Mattel, discussing an offer that could value the toy maker at $6 billion or more.
  • Mattel named Condé Nast Chief Executive Roger Lynch as its next CEO on Wednesday, succeeding Ynon Kreiz.
  • Mattel shares have dropped by more than 30% this year. The stock rose more than 4% on Thursday after The Wall Street Journal reported on the approach.

Barbie-maker Mattel MAT 18.80%increase; up pointing triangle, dealing with a sliding stock and now a chief-executive transition, recently attracted takeover interest from brand-licensing giant Authentic Brands Group, according to people familiar with the matter.

Authentic Brands Group has made an approach and been privately discussing an offer that could value Mattel at more than $20 a share, or around $6 billion or more, some of the people said.

Mattel shares had dropped by more than 30% this year and on Wednesday, the toy maker named Condé Nast Chief Executive Roger Lynch its next CEO. The shares fell again to close at $12.66, giving the company a market value of about $3.6 billion.

The stock rose 19% to $15.04 on Thursday, its biggest percentage gain in more than seven-and-a-half years, after The Wall Street Journal reported on the approach.

Lynch, who was already on the board, will become chairman on Friday and take over as CEO in the next month, the company said Wednesday. He succeeded Ynon Kreiz, who is leaving to become co-CEO of Paramount.

There is no guarantee Mattel will be receptive to Authentic’s approach or the two sides will reach a deal, the people cautioned. Another suitor for Mattel could also emerge, they said. Lynch’s pending appointment as new CEO could complicate any deal as he tries to figure out his strategy.

A formal sale process for Mattel isn’t currently under way, one of the people said.

The maker of Hot Wheels cars and American Girl dolls has been struggling to grow beyond just toys and into entertainment. Its shares peaked over a decade ago. Analysts who cover the company say many of Mattel’s brands—like Barbie—could be worth more alone than the value of the entire business.

Mattel has been under pressure from investors, notably Southeastern Asset Management, to raise funds from a private-equity investor or sell itself entirely.

Authentic’s interest in Mattel would fit with its strategy of buying up and reviving distressed brands and undervalued intellectual property. Its billionaire founder Jamie Salter built an empire by picking off labels such as Reebok and Champion.

In May, Authentic struck a roughly $1 billion deal with the apparel retailer Kontoor Brands to buy its Lee denim and casual-clothing business. It also struck a $1.4 billion deal to take private Guess, another jeans maker. Separately, it manages the likenesses of celebrities and athletes including Shaquille O’Neal and David Beckham.

Earlier this year, Authentic tapped the former CEO of casino operator Wynn Resorts, Matthew Maddox, to be its next leader.

FT : BT seeks government nod for potential TalkTalk takeover Telecoms group hold

BT seeks government nod for potential TalkTalk takeover
Telecoms group holds talks with UK officials over possible antitrust issues involved in buying smaller competitor

BT has opened talks with UK government officials over the possibility of a takeover bid for struggling rival TalkTalk, as the country’s largest broadband provider prepares a late entrance into the auction for the heavily indebted company.

Allison Kirkby, chief executive of the FTSE 100 telecoms group, this week met officials at the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport to seek assurances that a takeover of TalkTalk would not trigger an in-depth antitrust review, according to three people familiar with the matter.

BT is interested in buying the company’s wholesale and retail businesses, two of the people said.

Its broadband network Openreach, which is deemed by industry watchdog Ofcom to have significant market power, is TalkTalk’s largest supplier. The division covers more than 30mn UK homes, almost 25mn of them with full fibre.

People familiar with the TalkTalk auction said that it had been held up partly by other bidders’ concerns over the quantum of fees payable to Openreach.

Meanwhile, BT is also the country’s largest broadband provider with 30 per cent market share, according to estimates from Enders Analysis.

BT is working with antitrust lawyers at Clifford Chance on the possible TalkTalk deal, some of the people said.

TalkTalk’s owners, which include founder Sir Charles Dunstone and private capital group Ares, have been seeking a buyer for the troubled business for months. The company was previously in exclusive negotiations to offload its wholesale business to Octopus Investments and its consumer operations, which serve 1.6mn customers, to Opus Broadband.

However, neither party has been able to reach an agreement, forcing TalkTalk to explore options including a break-up that would potentially carve up the company between private capital group Epiris and Ares, its largest creditor. Talks with several potential buyers are ongoing, according to one of the people.

The company’s existing shareholders have been forced to inject money into the business to cover shortfalls on several occasions.

BT is hoping to have gained enough clarity over the antitrust situation to be able to make a decision over a deal for TalkTalk by the weekend, one of the people said.

Karen Egan, head of telecoms at Enders Analysis, said that “when companies get to the level of distress that TalkTalk appears to be in, competition concerns tend to take a back seat.”

“In this instance, the government will be more concerned about security and continuity of service for vulnerable customers,” she added.

TalkTalk has struggled since it was taken private by Toscafund, a London-based hedge fund, in a £1.1bn leveraged buyout in 2021 that added £527mn of debt to its balance sheet. The company’s retail customer base has fallen from more than 2.5mn in 2023 to about 1.6mn in May. 

Shareholders injected £235mn into TalkTalk as part of a refinancing in December 2024 and then a further £120mn in July last year. Ares pumped in another £115mn in March.

A DCMS spokesperson said that “this is a commercial matter and we do not comment on speculation”.

TalkTalk, BT, Ares and Epiris declined to comment. Clifford Chance did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Information : Why Coding Agents Are Choosing Vercel as Often as Humans Do Wh

Why Coding Agents Are Choosing Vercel as Often as Humans Do

The rise of AI agents that write software continues to pay off for the companies that host such software. Among them is Vercel, whose software helps developers make and host websites and AI apps, including so-called agents that automate white-collar tasks.

The 11-year-old company is generating $600 million in annualized revenue, or $50 million a month, up 148% from a year earlier and up from $500 million in July. The number of paying customers also rose by a similar amount, around 20%, according to a person close to the company.

Valued at $9.3 billion in a financing a year ago, Vercel has since changed its business model and mostly charges customers based on their usage rather than through subscriptions. The company competes with an array of software firms, including Netlify and Cloudflare, as well as cloud providers like Amazon. And it’s also competing with OpenRouter, soon to be owned by Stripe, in helping app developers pick and choose the right AI models from one application programming interface.

Coding AI agents that produce new code now account for about half of Vercel’s new business, up from less than 3% at the start of the year, CEO Guillermo Rauch said in June at Vercel’s Ship conference in London.

The company has long been known as a platform that helps developers put websites and apps online quickly. It removed much of the technical setup between writing code and getting it live, such as configuring servers and getting security certificates, and managed the infrastructure for customers. Many developers, and now coding agents, such as Claude Code, Cursor or OpenAI’s Codex, default to Vercel as a result, in part because they learned web development largely on Next.js, Vercel’s open-source framework.

Early this year, Vercel repositioned the company around AI agents, rebuilding its infrastructure so agents can easily deploy and run the software they create. “Right place, right time,” a person close to the company said.

“Agents are choosing Vercel alongside humans, and they’re first class builders on the platform” said Glenn Solomon, a managing partner at venture firm Notable Capital, which has backed Vercel. “There‘s more software written in the past few years than in humankind’s history prior - because agents don’t take vacation.”

Vercel counts 485,000 paying customers, according to a person close to the company. Its enterprise customers include Meta, SpaceXAI, Cursor, OpenAI, The Weather Company and Zapier, Vercel says.

Founded in San Francisco in November 2015, Vercel is one of the few infrastructure companies started before ChatGPT that has successfully reoriented its business around the AI boom, and it has done so with the high gross margins typical of software companies, unlike most AI coding startups, whose margins are thin.

One product that draws business to the Vercel hosting business is Next.js, which software engineers use to develop websites. Next.js has been downloaded 1.3 billion times this year through August, including 300 million downloads between July and August alone, according to a person with direct knowledge.

Another free, open-source product is Vercel’s AI software development kit, which helps developers connect their apps to AI models. Rauch has described the AI SDK as “the Next.js of AI.”

The AI SDK is downloaded about 33 million times a week, as of October 1, according to npm, a software registry for JavaScript, making it the third-most-downloaded AI SDK after those made by OpenAI and Anthropic.

Rauch, a longtime advocate of open-source software and the open web, said in April that Vercel wants to file for an initial public offering but hasn't decided on a timeline.