>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up: APRI +32.7%, VVUS +26.9%, OCRX +20.9%, ELF +16.8%, NWPX+11.3%, SMTC +6.4%, SHLD +5.6%, CMTL +4.7%, ERJ +4.6%, HIMX +4.4%, PXLW+3.9%, FOLD +3.9%, RAD +3.2%, GNC +3.1%, MUX +2.7%, ERII +2.3%, BBVA+2.2%, JONE +2.2%, CRIS +2%, KEYW +1.9%, DB +1.8%, SHLO +1.7%, GMS+1.6%, UNFI +1.5%, NOK +1.4%, VRX +1.3%, ERIC +1.3%, IMOS +1.3%, SAN+0.9%, SIG +0.9%, PLUG +0.9%, SSYS +0.9%, INAP +0.9%, TTPH +0.8%, SXE+0.7%, PRTY +0.7%, CS +0.6%

Gapping down: TLRD -29%, HZN -21.9%, RATE -15.5%, NSYS -12.1%, CGNT-11.8%, SPPI -10%, WATT -6.9%, VNET -6.7%, CWH -4.8%, PCOM -4.6%, FRO-4.5%, BCRX -4.3%, HEAR -4.3%, TVIA -3.8%, PLNT -3.6%, FGP -3.4%, RIG-3.2%, SBGL -3.2%, CHK -2.8%, BETR -2.8%, SFS -2.8%, CDE -2.7%, CSTM -2.7%,NE -2.6%, TGTX -2.5%, VALE -2.5%, IGT -2.5%, ESV -2.4%, AU -2.3%, TNDM-2.3%, BBL -2.2%, FCX -2.2%, BHP -2.2%, X -2.1%, GFI -2%, COKE -2%, RDS.A-1.9%, SPLS -1.9%, RIO -1.8%, HMY -1.8%, MRO -1.8%, DVN -1.8%, CLF -1.8%,PBR -1.7%, RUN -1.7%, TOT -1.4%, AA -1.4%, XXII -1.1%

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
:
  • VVUS +24%, BETR +21.8%, ELF +21.1%, NWPX +11.3%, SMTC +10.8%,SHLD +6.8%, CMTL +4.7%
  • ERJ +4.1%, PRTY +3.9%, GMS +3.8%, SKIS +3.3%, UNFI +3.1%, ERII +2.3%,CRIS +2%
  • KEYW +1.9%, (ALSO KEYW Holding signs a definitive agreement to acquire Sotera Defense Solutions in an all-cash transaction valued at approx. $235 miln)
  • IMOS +1.9%, BSTG +1.7%, INAP +0.9%
M&A news:
  • CNQ +2% (purchases Canadian Sands Assets from MRO and Shell), .
Other news:
  • APRI +24.1% (completes sale of its ex-U.S. assets and rights related to Vitaros to Ferring International; co will retain its Vitaros rights in the U.S. and it remains on track to re-submit the Vitaros NDA to the FDA in the third quarter of 2017)
  • OCRX +20% (rebounding after yesterday's decline)
  • PXLW +3.9% (following late move higher)
  • FOLD +3.9% ( commences the commercial launch of the precision medicine Galafold in Italy following the final publication of reimbursement guidelines by the Ministry of Health ), RAD +3.7% (rebounding after yesterday's decline)
  • GNC +3.1% (Chief Innovation Officer disclosed purchase of 29500 shares worth approx $230K)
  • KEYW +1.9% (KEYW Holding signs a definitive agreement to acquire Sotera Defense Solutions in an all-cash transaction valued at approx. $235 miln)
  • AIG +1.9% (announced President and CEO Peter D. Hancock plans to resign)
  • VRX +1% (launches an offering of $2.5 bln senior secured notes in 2 tranches )
Analyst comments:
  • HIMX +3.1% (upgraded to Buy at Mizuho)
  • .XOG +2.1% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Citigroup)
  • ERIC +2% (upgraded to Buy at Goldman)
  • TEF +1% (upgraded to Buy from Hold at Deutsche Bank)

>>> Janus - Bill Gross March Inv. Outlook. : Show Me The Money (see attached)

Show Me The Money

“School days” inexorably continue at the Gross household, not just because of grandchildren,
but because of the necessity to teach my own kids the complexities and pitfalls of investing.
As I get older, I fear I may unduly introduce them to a 1930s Will Rogers warning about
losing money: “I’m not so much concerned about the return on my money,” he wrote, “but the
return of my money.” “Don’t lose it” is my first and most important conceptual lesson for them
despite the Trump bull market and the current “animal spirits” that encourage risk, as opposed
to the preservation of capital.
Recently I also explored with them the concept of financial leverage – specifically that of
fractional reserve banking, which has been the basis of credit and real economic growth
since the system was blessed by central banks over a century ago. “It still mystifies me,” I
told them, “how a banking system can create money out of thin air, but it does.” By rough
estimates, banks and their shadows have turned $3 trillion of “base” credit into $65 trillion +
of “unreserved” credit in the United States alone – Treasuries, munis, bank loans, mortgages
and stocks too, although equities are not officially “credit” they are still dependent on the cash
flow that supports the system.
But I jump ahead of myself. “Pretend,” I told the “fam” huddled around the kitchen table, that
there is only one dollar and that you own it and have it on deposit with the Bank of USA – the
only bank in the country. The bank owes you a buck any time you want to withdraw it. But the
bank says to itself, “she probably won’t need this buck for a while, so I’ll lend it to Joe who
wants to start a pizza store.” Joe borrows the buck and pays for flour, pepperoni and a pizza
oven from Sally’s Pizza Supplies, who then deposits it back in the same bank in their checking
account. Your one and only buck has now turned into two. You have a bank account with one
buck and Sally’s Pizza has a checking account with one buck. Both parties have confidence
that their buck is actually theirs, even though there’s really only one buck in the bank’s vault.

WSJ : PPG Makes $22 Billion Offer for Paint Rival Akzo Nobel, Is Rejected

PPG Makes $22 Billion Offer for Paint Rival Akzo Nobel, Is Rejected
Dutch chemicals maker says offer substantially undervalues the company

Dutch paints and chemicals maker Akzo Nobel NV said Thursday it has rejected an unsolicited €20.9 billion ($22.1 billion) offer from U.S. peer PPG Industries Inc., setting up a trans-Atlantic standoff that pits two of the world’s oldest industrial giants amid a wave of consolidation in the sector.
Amsterdam-based Akzo, whose shares were up more than 14% Thursday morning, said the offer prompted it to explore selling off its specialty-chemicals division.
Akzo said PPG made an offer of €54 in cash and 0.3 PPG shares for each Akzo share, corresponding to a value of €83 a share.

Akzo—which counts Dulux, Sikkens, Interpon and Eka among its brands—said PPG’s proposal substantially undervalues the company and isn’t in the interest of its shareholders. The company, which employs 46,000 people in around 80 countries, said its board has carefully reviewed and considered PPG’s proposal and unanimously rejected it.
“The proposal contains serious risks and uncertainties,” Chief Executive Ton Büchner said in a statement. “I firmly believe that Akzo Nobel is best placed to unlock the value within our company ourselves,” he added.
PPG—whose brands include Pittsburgh Paints, Olympic and Glidden—confirmed the proposal, saying it continues to believe there is strong strategic rationale for the deal and that it would now consider its next steps. It added that a combination would create a strong player in a highly competitive market by bringing together complementary products and technologies, as well as strengths in different parts of the world.
Mr. Büchner said PPG’s approach had prompted Akzo to announce plans to explore separating its specialty chemicals business, including establishing the unit as an independent listed entity. The business, which reported revenue of €4.8 billion in 2016, produces a range of chemicals used in construction, industrial and consumer goods.
The spurned offer sets up a standoff between two of the world’s oldest industrial companies. Akzo Nobel was created in 1994 from the merger of paint and chemicals companies in Sweden and the Netherlands that dated back more than a century, including a chemicals firm founded by Alfred Nobel, who launched the prizes that bear his name. Akzo later acquired two of Britain’s oldest paint and chemicals firms.

PPG, founded in 1883 as Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., was the first U.S. company to successfully market large sheets of glass, until then an expensive rarity. It quickly expanded into chemicals to secure a supply of raw materials and was an early supplier of the automotive and aviation industries.
Mr. Büchner, who took over the top job at Akzo in 2011, has presided over a comprehensive restructuring and led the company back to profitability. But he has in the past resisted separating the specialty chemicals unit because it has been the group’s “cash cow,” said Markus Mayer, an analyst with Germany’s Baader Bank.

“The market would love that Akzo would spin off specialty chemicals,” Mr. Mayer added.
Such a move would be in line with PPG’s interests were it to come back with a revised bid, analysts said. If Akzo was already in the process of separating its specialty chemicals business, the ultimate sale of the unit could help PPG in refinancing its acquisition of Akzo.
Analysts and investors seemed to support the idea of a PPG takeover of the Dutch company.
A tie-up would be “credible and potentially powerful,” analysts at Bernstein Bank noted. Analysts at Citigroup said the “strategic rationale” for a deal was high, though noted overlap of some business areas could raise antitrust concerns in Europe.
The offer comes amid a period of consolidation in the chemicals industry. U.S. giants Dow Chemical Co. and DuPont Co. are in the process of completing a $120 billion merger, and have offered to sell businesses to gain approval from the European Union’s antitrust regulator.
Industrial gas giant Praxair Inc. and Germany’s Linde AG created a combined entity worth $66.6 billion after it agreed to a merger in December.


Other potential tie-ups in the broader chemicals sector include Bayer’s planned $57 billion takeover of U.S. agrochemical giant Monsanto Co. and China National Chemical Corp.’s planned $43 billion acquisition of Swiss seed company Syngenta AG.
After a record year of mergers and acquisitions activity in the industry, consolidation is likely to continue in chemical industries across the board, Baader’s Mr. Mayer said. He cited a low growth environment, cheap financing and overcapacity in many markets.
Thursday’s proposal isn’t the first time PPG has courted Akzo. In 2012, the Pittsburgh-based company bought Akzo’s North American house-paint business for $1.05 billion.
In December, PPG launched a restructuring program in an effort to save $120 million to $130 million a year because of a slowdown in global demand and weaker-than-expected growth in Europe.
Akzo became one of the world’s largest paints makers after it acquired U.K. rival Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. in 2008 for £8 billion ($12.9 billion). But the Dutch company struggled to digest the debt-financed acquisition, which raised its exposure to Europe’s troubled automotive and construction industries, culminating in a series of profit warnings in 2011. It has since slashed costs and laid off staff.
At close of business Wednesday, Akzo had a market capitalization of $17.12 billion, while PPG’s was $27.47 billion.

(Le Monde) Chris Hohn : « Paris ne peut être une alternative à Londres »

Chris Hohn : « Paris ne peut être une alternative à Londres »
Pour le fondateur du fonds activiste TCI, la protection des actionnaires minoritaires est « indigne » en France.

LE MONDE ECONOMIE | 09.03.2017 à 12h53 | Par Isabelle Chaperon

Réagir AjouterPartager (1)Tweeter
Chris Hohn, le fondateur du fonds britannique TCI (The Children’s Investment Fund Management) est fou de rage. Le plus célèbre investisseur activiste européen fait campagne contre le projet de rachat de l’équipementier aéronautique Zodiac par le motoriste Safran dont il détient 4 %. Dans une interview exclusive accordée au Monde, Chris Hohn estime que cette affaire permet de tester la crédibilité de la place de Paris.
Lire aussi : Safran-Zodiac : la nouvelle attaque de l’activiste TCI

Que représente la France dans votre portefeuille d’investissements ?

Nous sommes actionnaires de deux sociétés cotées à Paris, Airbus et Safran. Ces deux participations représentent 18 % de notre portefeuille. Par le passé, nous avons été au capital d’Euronext. En fait, il y a beaucoup d’entreprises françaises de classe mondiale dans lesquelles nous aimerions investir mais nous sommes réticents à le faire.
Pourquoi ?

Parce que la protection des actionnaires minoritaires est défaillante en France. Safran en est le parfait exemple. L’acquisition de Zodiac est une transaction très importante pour le groupe. Au Royaume-Uni ou aux Etats-Unis, cette opération nécessiterait l’approbation préalable des actionnaires. Mais la loi française n’oblige pas l’acquéreur à organiser un vote en cas de rachat en cash. C’est un abus évident vis-à-vis des actionnaires.
Qu’espérez-vous ?

Nous demandons que les actionnaires de Safran aient leur mot à dire sur le rachat de Zodiac, mais pas au dernier moment, quand il sera trop tard pour revenir en arrière. Nous, nous pensons que cette transaction est déplorable. Mais là n’est même pas le débat. Tout ce que nous voulons, c’est pouvoir voter. Nous respecterons le vote. C’est une question de démocratie. Pour nous, si Safran ne consulte pas l’assemblée générale, c’est précisément parce que ses dirigeants savent que les actionnaires voteront contre l’opération.
Vous êtes en contact avec les autres actionnaires de Safran…

De nombreux investisseurs sont choqués de voir leurs droits bafoués. Compte tenu de leur mandat de gestion, ils ne peuvent pas s’exprimer publiquement, mais il ne faut pas se tromper sur la portée de cette affaire. C’est un test crucial pour la place de Paris au moment où elle doit prouver son attractivité dans la perspective du Brexit. Or, c’est tout le contraire qui se passe. La France se comporte comme un pays du tiers-monde en matière de gouvernance d’entreprise.
Lire aussi : Safran défend son projet de fusion avec Zodiac

Vous doutez de la capacité de Paris à séduire les exilés du Brexit ?

« PERSONNE N’IRA SE COTER, IMPLANTER SES ACTIVITÉS DE TAUX OU DE COMPENSATION À PARIS DANS CES CONDITIONS »
Paris ne peut être une alternative à Londres avec une protection des minoritaires aussi indigne. Personne n’ira se coter, implanter ses activités de taux ou de compensation à Paris dans ces conditions. C’est dommage, la France a besoin de créer des emplois, pas de faire fuir les investisseurs. Les pays se livrent une compétition farouche pour attirer les capitaux et les emplois. Le président Trump a pris des dispositions dans ce sens, notamment à travers des baisses d’impôts. Le Royaume-Uni aussi. La France doit ouvrir les yeux sur le monde qui l’entoure.
Quel regard portez-vous sur les élections à venir ?

J’ai tendance à penser que plus les problèmes économiques sont criants, plus il devient possible de mener des réformes. Mais depuis vingt ans que j’investis partout dans le monde, je n’ai jamais vu la France changer…
Avez-vous rencontré l’Autorité des marchés financiers ?

Nous avons demandé un rendez-vous mais nous n’avons pas encore été reçus. Pour nous, il est clair que le gouvernement français souhaite le rapprochement entre Safran et Zodiac. Si l’AMF est vraiment indépendante, qu’elle le montre !
Et les dirigeants de Safran ?

Nous nous sommes rencontrés vendredi 3 mars. Nous leur avons fait une proposition qu’ils ont mal prise. Mais nous sommes très sérieux. Puisqu’ils sont si sûrs de redresser les marges de Zodiac – ce qui justifie selon eux le prix exorbitant de cette acquisition – eh bien nous trouvons juste qu’ils ne perçoivent aucun bonus si le résultat opérationnel n’atteint pas 1 milliard d’euros en 2019, comme promis à la communauté financière.
Le thème de la rémunération des dirigeants vous tient à cœur. On l’a vu avec Volkswagen…

Le cas de Volkswagen est un bon exemple de la façon dont une mauvaise gouvernance et une rémunération excessive peuvent entraîner une sortie de route dommageable pour tous, l’entreprise, ses salariés, ses actionnaires. Les salariés de Safran (et de Zodiac) ont beaucoup à perdre si la fusion se fait. Des réductions d’effectifs seront nécessaires pour compenser le cadeau fait aux familles propriétaires de Zodiac.
En 2016, le conseil d’administration de Renault n’a pas respecté le vote de l’assemblée générale sur la rémunération de Carlos Ghosn. Qu’en pensez-vous ?

La France doit faire en sorte que le conseil d’administration soit obligé de tenir compte du vote des actionnaires sur les rémunérations. Là encore, c’est une question de crédibilité.
Lire aussi : La rémunération de Carlos Ghosn passe très mal

Il y a dix ans, le patron de Deutsche Börse avait traité de « sauterelles » les fonds activistes. Etes-vous toujours mal vu des entreprises ?

Non. Nous sommes des actionnaires à long terme qui avons la volonté d’être constructifs. Par exemple avec Airbus, cela s’est très bien passé. En Espagne, nous sommes entrés au capital de l’opérateur aéroportuaire Aena lors de sa privatisation, et le gouvernement – qui est resté majoritaire – nous a demandé d’intégrer le conseil d’administration afin de renforcer sa crédibilité auprès de la communauté financière internationale…

(Jefferies) Asset Manager M&A May Also Apply to Investment Trusts

Asset Manager M&A May Also Apply to Investment Trusts: Jefferies
Drivers of recent fund manager M&A are also applicable to investment trusts, Jefferies says in note.
  • Rise of ETFs, fee pressure and need to broaden distribution should provide added momentum for boards to consider mergers
  • Says investors in sector would be “better served” if mergers between trusts were used to address these issues
  • Especially if mergers can create large/liquid ‘mega-trusts,’ funds that would be big enough to be included in the FTSE 100
  • Adds that the investment trust sector is over-fragmented, has been left behind by growth of its investor base post-RDR
  • Larger trusts may be better positioned to address industry fee pressure, larger pools of capital means better negotiating positions with managers on fees, and fixed costs are spread
  • Scottish Mortgage joining the FTSE 100 highlights that scale doesn’t have to come at the expense of performance