>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
:
  • FC +9.8%, AMRN +7.2%, AEHR +6.3%, (also received an initial order from a new customer for its FOX-XP test and burn-in system for singulated bare die testing and burn-in of integrated silicon photonics devices for data communications applications), SONC +4.1%, TTOO +3.9%, (FDA Clearance of T2Bacteria Panel remains on track for first quarter 2018; sees Q4 rev above prior guidance ), RTIX +1.2%
Other news:
  • CNIT +78.2% (continued strength), CCIH +48.5% (continued strength)
  • CFMS +23.9% (announced the publication of a prospective study in The Journal of Knee Surgery)
  • WSCI +17.5% (DPW Holdings discloses 7.76% active stake; may engage in communications with management and Board )
  • DWCH +15.2% (higher following Reuters report that the company hired financial adviser)
  • CCCR +13% (continued strength)
  • YUME +6.6% (YuMe indicated higher after RhythmOne commenced exchange offer for outstanding YuMe shares pursuant to previously announced merger agreement)
  • AEHR +6.3% (received an initial order from a new customer for its FOX-XP test and burn-in system for singulated bare die testing and burn-in of integrated silicon photonics devices for data communications applications)
  • CNET +6% (after surging 700% higher)
  • ZFGN +3.3% (ZGN-1061 Phase 2 trial fully enrolled with type 2 diabetes patients)
  • IONS +2.1% (being attributed to AVXS news),
  • RTIX +1.2% (to acquire spine-focused medical device company Zyga Technology; terms of the deal were not disclosed)
  • KTOS +1.1% (Microwave Electronics Division has recently received an approximately $20 million contract award for initial production of microwave electronic products)
Analyst comments:
  • SNDX +2.8% (initiated with a Buy at B. Riley FBR)
  • CERS +1.6% (resumed with a Overweight at Cantor Fitzgerald)

Challenges : Airbus : Corruption, guerre des chefs... Pour cet ex n°2 de la DGSE

Corruption, guerre des chefs... Pour cet ex n°2 de la DGSE, "la situation est très grave à Airbus"



EXCLUSIF L’ancien patron de l’intelligence économique à Matignon et directeur du renseignement à la DGSE dresse le portrait apocalyptique d’un Airbus menacé par les affaires, miné par le "pouvoir absolu" de Tom Enders et décapité de ses meilleurs éléments. Interview choc.

Alain Juillet n’a pas l’habitude de parler pour ne rien dire. Ancien directeur du renseignement à la DGSE, ex-responsable de l’intelligence économique à Matignon, le président de l’Académie de l’intelligence économique suit avec attention la situation d’Airbus depuis la montée en puissance des affaires de corruption. Il dresse pour Challenges un constat apocalyptique sur la situation du champion européen, menacé par les affaires de corruption, une incroyable guerre des chefs qui a abouti au départ du numéro deux Fabrice Brégier, le "pouvoir absolu" du président exécutif Tom Enders, et un conseil d’administration dépassé.

Que vous inspire le départ prochain du numéro deux d'Airbus Fabrice Brégier, après une lutte à mort avec le président exécutif Tom Enders ?

Cela faisait déjà un moment que Tom Enders s'employait à consolider son pouvoir absolu sur le groupe, récupérant peu à peu toutes les prérogatives de son numéro deux Fabrice Brégier. L'objectif était d'être en position de force pour obtenir un troisième mandat en 2019. Enders était en cela appuyé par le président du conseil d'administration Denis Ranque, au nom d'une alliance d'intérêts : Enders restait à la tête du groupe, Ranque à celle du board. Les affaires de corruption présumée ont aggravé les tensions entre Enders et Brégier. Tom Enders a voulu se saisir de l'affaire des irrégularités sur les ventes d'avions civils pour endosser le costume de M. Propre, démanteler la division SMO (Strategy and Marketing Organisation) de Marwan Lahoud et récupérer la responsabilité du commercial. Fabrice Brégier, lui, a voulu profiter du fait que Tom Enders était mis en cause dans l'affaire de la vente des Eurofighter en Autriche pour tenter de prendre sa place. Pour sauver sa tête, Enders devait liquider son adjoint. C'est ce qu'il a fait, avec la bénédiction du board.

Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle du groupe, avec un Brégier en partance et un Enders très affaibli qui doit faire la transition jusqu'à 2019 ?

La situation est très grave : Airbus est aujourd'hui une société décapitée, plongée dans une crise managériale majeure. Fabrice Brégier quitte le groupe. Tom Enders reste, mais il est extrêmement affaibli. Le patron d'Airbus Helicopters Guillaume Faury le remplace, mais il n'a toujours pas de successeur à la tête d'une branche hélicoptères toujours en difficulté. Le groupe n'a plus de vrai patron de la stratégie depuis le départ de Marwan Lahoud début 2017. Le directeur commercial John Leahy, pilier du groupe, part à la retraite. Entre ceux qui partent et ceux qui sont virés, il y a un manque d'encadrement supérieur terrible chez Airbus. Tout est à reconstruire.

Tom Enders affirme qu'il quittera le groupe à l'échéance de son mandat mi-2019, après avoir géré la transition. Cette situation est-elle tenable pendant dix-huit mois ?

Il est certain qu'Enders apparaît extrêmement affaibli. Il voulait profiter des soupçons de corruption sur les contrats civils pour accroître son emprise sur le groupe et y faire le grand ménage. Le fait que son nom soit cité dans l'affaire autrichienne montre qu'il s'est fait prendre à son propre jeu. Ceci dit, il ne faut pas sous-estimer le bonhomme. On ne peut pas exclure qu'il tente de rester à la tête du groupe, si le montant de l'amende qu'infligera le Serious Fraud Office britannique est plus limité que prévu. Vu son caractère, on ne peut pas exclure non plus qu'il prenne des décisions fortes ces prochains mois, sur l'avenir de l'A380 par exemple, pour montrer qu'il est toujours le patron. Je suis persuadé que dans son esprit, le combat n'est pas fini.

Guillaume Faury a-t-il le bon profil pour remplacer Fabrice Brégier ?

C'est un très bon, indéniablement, qui connaît bien la maison et a fait du bon travail chez Airbus Helicopters. La question est de savoir s'il n'est pas un peu "bleu". Enders et Brégier étaient deux fauves : Faury a un profil beaucoup plus discret et réservé.

Airbus a réalisé une année 2017 record sur les livraisons, avec plus de 700 avions livrés. Le groupe est-il étanche à la crise de management actuelle ?

Ce qui est sûr, c'est qu'Airbus peut compter sur son énorme carnet de commandes, qui devrait lui permettre de vivre sans trop de problèmes pendant deux ou trois ans, ne serait-ce que par effet d'inertie. Mais le groupe doit prendre rapidement des décisions stratégiques majeures, sur l'A380 et l'A400M notamment. Tom Enders, dans la situation actuelle, est-il en position de prendre ces décisions qui engagent l'avenir de tout le groupe, comme un possible arrêt du programme A380 ?

Le conseil d'administration d'Airbus a-t-il été au niveau dans ce contexte ?

A l'évidence, il a failli. Il est invraisemblable que le conseil n'ait pas réagi plus tôt face à une situation managériale de cette gravité. Son rôle est justement d'éviter ce type de guerre des chefs, et de préparer dans la sérénité la succession des poids lourds du comité exécutif qui quittent le groupe. La réalité, c'est que Tom Enders a conçu ce conseil pour être à sa botte, avec des membres très bien rémunérés qui l'ont suivi aveuglément jusqu'à très récemment.

Faut-il envisager un retour d'administrateurs représentant les Etats au sein du board, alors qu'ils en ont été éjectés en 2013 ?

Cela me paraît du simple bon sens. Vu les investissements consentis sur l'A400M, les Etats français et allemand sont fondés à revenir autour de la table. Cela devra être négocié entre la France et l'Allemagne quand cette dernière aura de nouveau un gouvernement stable. Le défi est de trouver des administrateurs étatiques compétents et impliqués, ce qui est loin d'avoir été systématiquement le cas dans les sociétés où l'Etat est au capital.

Les pouvoirs publics ont-il joué leur rôle ?

On a bien vu dans cette affaire que l'Etat français n'a, pendant longtemps, pas eu accès aux informations lui permettant de saisir la gravité de la situation. Après avoir surveillé l'affaire de loin, l'Elysée ne s'y intéresse vraiment que depuis quelques semaines. Il est grand temps d'agir.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up:
  • CNIT +83.2%, CCIH +54.8%, CFMS +48.3%, CCCR +19.2%, WSCI +17.5%, DWCH +15.2%, FC +9.8%, NQ +8.1%, AMRN +7.2%, YUME +6.6%, AEHR +6.3%, AEHR +6.3%, CNET +6%, SONC +5.2%, TTOO +3.9%, IONS +2.1%, LNG +1.6%, TELL +1.5%, RTIX +1.2%, RTIX +1.2%, KTOS +0.5%
Gapping down:
  • OHRP -69.8%, RGNX -18%, RGNX -18%, FRAN -16.8%, NOVN -10.4%, HTGM -7.7%, SCYX -7.4%, OMED -7%, PSMT -6.7%, CALM -4.6%, AVXS -4.5%, BKS -3.1%, OKE -3%, AUPH -3%, M -2%, CRSP -0.9%

REcode.net : Another big Amazon acquisition, a Peloton IPO — and other commerce

Another big Amazon acquisition, a Peloton IPO — and other commerce predictions for 2018
If 2017 is any indication, 2018 will be a big year for e-commerce and retail.


A year ago, I had some success when I correctly forecasted Stitch Fix would be one of three hot e-commerce companies that could have surprise IPOs in 2017. My other two nominees — Chewy and Casper — didn’t go public, but the former sold for $3 billion and the latter engaged in serious sale talks with Target. I’ll call that a win.

This year, I’m going a bit broader with my look-ahead, in part because I don’t foresee many e-commerce public offerings for 2018. But I do predict a ton of action. Here are my thoughts:
Amazon makes a big move to move big products

Talk of Amazon acquiring Nordstrom or Target is fun — and you can make a rather strong case for the Nordstrom deal making sense — but I’ll focus on what I consider more realistic scenarios for 2018.

Amazon is an expert at selling and delivering items small enough to fit in traditional shipping boxes, but it’s not nearly as far along when it comes to being a destination for the sale of bigger goods like furniture and appliances or having the in-house logistics set up to get them to customer doors. This could be the year it makes a move or two to fix that.

On the logistics side, a source previously told Recode that Home Depot was considering a bid for the $11 billion freight transportation and warehousing company XPO, in part because its executives believed Amazon also had interest. XPO does everything from managing warehouses to owning its own fleet of freight trucks to setting up the last-mile delivery of big items like appliances and furniture to the homes of consumers.

If Amazon were willing to pay up for XPO — and that’s a big if — it could let XPO continue to offer most of its services to its existing customers but carve off the home-delivery business for itself so it controls more of what happens after a shopper hits “Buy.”

On the retail side, Amazon could strengthen a position that it currently doesn’t dominate by buying Wayfair, the fast-growing online furniture seller with about $4 billion in annual revenue and a market value of about $7 billion.

And since you’re here ... The most tantalizing — and crazy — Amazon M&A rumor I’ve heard in the last few months that’s very much still just a rumor to me? Potential interest in buying Costco, the $83 billion retailer that has largely continued to thrive even as Amazon has decimated others.

Facebook emerges as a real challenger to Craigslist

Facebook’s Marketplace had a rough start when it launched in late 2016. But a year later, the site has morphed into a thriving bazaar of used goods with a surprisingly healthy amount of both buyers and sellers — as well as a differentiating trust factor because Facebook profiles back up each party in a transaction.

Its rise is a big reason why one of its heavily funded rival startups in the space, Letgo, approached a competitor last year about a merger. I’d expect Facebook to invest more into this product in 2018 to try to steal some share from Craigslist and bigger marketplaces like eBay.
Most big e-commerce IPOs wait another year

There are a handful of e-commerce companies that carry multi-billion dollar valuations, but almost none of them appear likely to go public in 2018.

I’ve been told that Wish, the maker of the popular shopping app that may soon be worth $8 billion, is likely to wait at least another year before going public. And an IPO for Fanatics, the $4 billion online seller of licensed sports apparel, is several years away.

An IPO for Houzz, the online home improvement inspiration and e-commerce site worth $4 billion, seems more than a year off — as does one for Instacart, the grocery-delivery company valued at $3 billion.

Even if you want to count Airbnb in the e-commerce category, there’s a good chance that that company, too, will wait until 2019. And looking abroad, an IPO for India’s Amazon rival Flipkart isn’t happening soon.
But Peloton and Farfetch will IPO

Peloton isn’t an e-commerce company, but as a hardware-and-content-subscription business with a growing chain of retail showrooms, it’s one I pay attention to.

Whatever you want to call the in-home cycling company today, there’s a good chance we’ll be calling Peloton a public company by the end of 2018. The company registered revenue of $170 million in 2016 and planned to at least double that number in 2017.

Recode also recently reported that Peloton planned to soon unveil a high-tech treadmill, most likely at this month’s Consumer Electronics Show, giving it another path for future growth.

Farfetch, the $2 billion e-commerce marketplace for luxury goods, has been a rumored IPO candidate for some time. I think an offering happens in 2018 if it doesn’t get acquired first. This past summer, the Chinese giant JD.com pumped nearly $400 million into the London-based company.
Big M&A involving digital-native brands focused on millennials

This is the year that several digital-native consumer brands hit a scale that forces incumbents looking to attract younger customers to make a move. While an older startup like Warby Parker fits the mold, its valuation north of $1 billion means the pool of potential acquirers is small.

But there’s a crop of less expensive, popular, newer brands that come to mind as realistic M&A targets. They include Glossier, the ultra-cool beauty brand; GOAT, the app that lets sneakerheads and collectors buy hard-to-find kicks; Boxed, the grocery app that aims to compete with Costco and Sam’s Club by delivering similar consumer goods to customer doors without the membership fee; and Zola, the New York startup that makes a wedding registry product popular with the millennial generation.
More consolidation in the grocery and consumer packaged goods industries

2017 was a big year for M&A in grocery, with Amazon’s purchase of Whole Foods and, on a much smaller scale, Albertsons’ acquisition of the meal-kit company Plated.

If Blue Apron’s struggles continue well into the first half of 2018 — and its market cap drops back around $500 million — I’d expect them to attract interest, too. As mentioned above, Boxed is another player that could get a look, while Instacart’s $3 billion valuation makes an acquisition of it unlikely.

In the CPG industry, Unilever has been an aggressive acquirer, with its $1 billion acquisition of Dollar Shave Club being the most notable move for a digital-first consumer packaged goods company.

In 2018, I expect other CPG giants to get more aggressive in acquiring young brands with direct customer relationships, in part to control more of their destiny as e-commerce sales in the category grow and Amazon and Walmart amass more power.

>>> Michelin up to USD 600m CB book covered, seen pricing towards midpoint


Michelin up to USD 600m CB book covered, seen pricing towards midpoint
05 JAN 2018

French tyre maker Michelin’s [EPA:ML] USD 500m to USD 600m offering of 2023 non-dilutive convertible bonds (CBs) has been covered on the extended deal size, a source close to the deal said.

A message was sent out to investors at 09:15 GMT, he said, adding that further price guidance would follow at a later stage.

The bonds will be issued at an issue price of 95.50% to 100% of their nominal value, corresponding to an annual gross yield to maturity of 0% to 0.79%. The conversion premium has been set at 30%. Michelin issued USD 500m worth of bonds exactly one year ago, at ranges of 98%-100% of nominal value and 23%-28% premium. It priced at the rich end for investors, as reported.

This time around, the bond looks likely to price around midpoint, according to a UK-based buysider. The range is rather wide, making harder to say where the pricing should end up, he conceded.

At the cheap end, the bonds would be priced fairly to the option market, but Michelin can go for midpoint pricing, based on the level the old paper has corrected to, he said. There is a lot of Michelin paper to choose from, so top end pricing is less likely, the buysider added.

The bonds are structured in such a way that they seem to have the advantages of cross-currency USD-EUR paper, but as the optionality is priced in EUR, which has a flatter curve than the USD, there is less optionality, the buysider said. This structure is not new, he said. The paper mimics USD bond flow, which enjoys a steeper curve, but as the strike is set in EUR, the advantage of this is limited, he continued.

BNP Paribas, HSBC, JPMorgan and Societe Generale are the bookrunners, according to the buysider.

A representative for Michelin was unavailable for comment.

(UBS) Why is increasing volatility likely to benefit active

Why is increasing volatility likely to benefit active managers in 2018?
Low volatility will not remain low for much longer
Index level volatility is low for two reasons: firstly, the weight of low volatility stocks in
the index has increased, and secondly, correlations have fallen. Stock level volatility,
however, has different components: a structural one that is driving volatility lower (this
trend remains intact), and a cyclical one (driven by the Fed tightening) that is likely to
drive volatility and hence dispersion of returns higher in 2018.

Higher volatility and dispersion is good news for active managers
Active managers outperform when return dispersion is high. We believe the outlook for
active management is positive as return dispersion is likely to increase, and correlations
are at all-time lows. Providing we don't have any major macro-economic shock (that is
likely to drive correlation higher) active managers are likely to perform well in 2018.

Quality is still King and Queen
A recent study by Russ Wermers points out that analysts add 2% per annum through
correctly forecasting cashflows, and then subtract 0.8% per annum through incorrect
discount rate assumptions. Quant models can overcome this challenge by using
analysts' cashflow forecasts and using financial statement quality metrics to select high
quality companies with high cashflow yields. Implicitly, the correct discount rate is
captured in the financial statement quality score. We take this one step further and
look for companies with improving fundamentals, as this forecasts improvement in the
cost of capital. Our analysis show that markets are already pricing a premium for high
quality companies, however the high delta quality subgroup (i.e., companies with
strong growth in quality factors) is not an expensive cluster right now. The combination
of a potential positive dispersion outlook for active managers and the fact high delta
quality cluster could be the first to be acted upon, can create an interesting trade
window for investors seeking alpha in the medium term.

We list high delta quality businesses with improving fundamentals
Focusing on high quality businesses with improving fundamentals provides us with a
low risk approach as if we're wrong and volatility and dispersion remains low, these
stocks are likely to outperform slightly. If volatility and dispersion increase, these stocks
are likely to outperform significantly. Right now our screen is highlighting: NetApp,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Costco, Lowe's, Berkeley Group, Aena, Covestro, Telenor, United
Arrows, ANTA Sports, Haier Electronics, Tsingtao Brewery, CSPC Pharmaceutical,
Harvey Norman, Rio Tinto. See page 22 for a full list of stocks.

>>> Atlantica Yield owner Abengoa considers changing sale process; may sell 16.5


Atlantica Yield owner Abengoa considers changing sale process; may sell 16.5% stake to funds - report (translated)
05 JAN 2018

Abengoa SA [BME:ABG] is considering changing the process to sell its entire 41.5% stake in Atlantica Yield [NASDAQ:ABY], Expansion reported, citing financial sources. Instead of selling the entire holding to a single purchaser, the Canadian group Algonquin Power & Utilities [NYSE:AQN], Abengoa could accept offers from various funds that would enter Atlantica’s capital together with Algonquin, the paper said.

The transaction would affect 16.5% of Atlantica Yield, valued at around EUR 350m, the Spanish-language paper noted.

Algonquin announced the purchase of 25% of Atlantica last November. The deal, which included a broader strategic and industrial agreement, was valued at USD 607m (EUR 522m at the time) based on a price of USD 24.25 per Atlantica share. At the time, the valuation represented a 18% premium on the average share price for the previous month and 20% over the average share price for the year.

Under the deal, Algonquin has an option to purchase the remaining 16.5% of Abengoa's stock in Atlantica at the same price, USD 24.25 per share. The option would be effective for a period of 60 days from the closing date of the 25% sale. On expiry of that period, Algonquin also reserved a right of first refusal that could be exercised during the first quarter of 2018 if other offers arose.

According to the report, given that Atlantica stock currently trades at USD 21, several funds are waiting for Algonquin's call option to expire and that it does not activate the right of first refusal.

Several entities, mainly Canadian, including Brookfield and the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (bcIMC), have shown interest, especially now that Atlantica has a great industrial partner in Canada, the paper added.