>>> What to look at this Week-End - 6th & 7th of January 2018

Weekly Performance
Dow +2.33% S&P +2.60% Nasdaq +3.38% Russell +1.60% Canada +0.87% Mexico +1.08% Brazil +3.49% EuroStoxx +2.96% FTSE +0.47% CAC +2.98% Dax +3.11% Ibex +3.66% MIB +4.16% OMX +2.18% SMI +1.87% Nikkei +4.17% Hang Seng +2.99% CSI +2.68% Shanghai +2.56% Shenzen +2.24%
The New Year started with a bang as stocks climbed aggressively and NYSE floor traders donned their ‘Dow 25,000’ hats. President Trump was quick to note the DJIA milestone, providing some distraction from a bad week of PR for the administration after his casual mention of the nuclear option in a tweet aimed at North Korea, and the release of a tell-all book about the White House that painted the President in a bad light and appeared to drive a wedge between him and former chief strategist Steve Bannon. The oil market remained bullish as the US Interior Department announced plans to open up more offshore areas to drilling. WTI crude rose to its highest level since June 2016, hitting the $62 handle, while natural gas prices paired last week’s gains as the end is in sight for the arctic freeze gripping half of the US. In corporate news this week, Macy’s and JC Penney reported improved sales y/y for the holiday season, and Costco also delivered strong results, handily topping Wall Street SSS estimates. Intel shares dropped after reports broke that its chips are susceptible to a hardware-based exploit and that the security patch could significantly impair performance.

Macro :
- Two Koreas to Talk, Merkel Seeks Coalition: Week Ahead Jan. 8-13
- Carmakers Risk EU4.5 Bln EU Emissions Fines From 2021: Study
- UK PM May to Reshuffle Cabinet on Monday, According to Reports
- Accounting Rules Lay Bare More Debt in DAX Cos., WiWo Says (1)

Keep an eye on :
- CLLN LN : U.K.’s Carillion to Present New Business Plan to Lenders: Sky
- BMW GY : Carmakers Risk EU4.5 Bln EU Emissions Fines From 2021: Study
- CYTX US : Cytori Gains; Maxim Sees as Acquisition Candidate After Tigenix
- DAI GY : Carmakers Risk EU4.5 Bln EU Emissions Fines From 2021: Study
- DHER GY : Luxor Funds Sell 4.89M Shares in Delivery Hero for EUR31.75/Shr
- DBK GY : Deutsche Bank Sees ’Small’ FY 2017 After-Tax Loss
- DBD US : Diebold Nixdorf Holder Atlantic Investment Cut Stake to ~6.8%
- DUFN SW : HNA Is Said to Weigh Sale of Two London Canary Wharf Offices
- EOAN GY : EON Board to Decide Monday on Sale of 47% Stake in Uniper: BZ
- ESA IM : Esaote purchase by Chinese consortium may be blocked by Italian government
- FRE GY : Fresenius to Focus on Acquisitions as Part of Growth Plan: BZ
- HAIN US : Hain Portfolio ’Too Diverse For Single Buyer:’ Wells Fargo
- KNIN SW : Kuehne + Nagel Chairman Seeks Bolt-on, Asia Deals, FuW Reports
- NFLX US : Netflix Propels TV Production, Dethrones HBO With Critics
- NRS NO : Norway Royal Salmon Cuts 2018 Harvest Volume Forecast on Virus
- UG FP : Opel CEO Confident of Avoiding Emissions Fines: Welt am Sonntag
- QCOM US : Qualcomm Processors Affected by Meltdown, Spectre: the Register
- SPOTIFY IPO : Spotify’s Chief Content Officer to Leave Company: Recode
- DG FP : Vinci Airports Wins Concession for Belgrade Airport: Kurir
- VOW3 GY : VW Estimates It Sold About 10.7 Mln Vehicles in 2017: Bild

WSJ : Pfizer Ends Hunt for Drugs to Treat Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s

Pfizer Ends Hunt for Drugs to Treat Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s
About 300 layoffs to take place after once-promising compounds failed during testing

Pfizer Inc. PFE 0.19% said Saturday it will stop trying to discover new drugs for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, abandoning costly but futile efforts to find effective treatments for the disorders.

The cutback will result in layoffs of 300 employees in Cambridge and Andover in Massachusetts and in Groton, Conn., over several months, according to a company statement.

The restructuring won’t affect later-stage drug development for pain treatments Lyrica and tanezumab, or research into drugs for rare neurological diseases, Pfizer said.


The company plans to use the savings to fund drug R&D in other areas. “This was an exercise to reallocate [spending] across our portfolio, to focus on those areas where our pipeline, and our scientific expertise, is strongest,” it said.

Pfizer also said it plans to establish a corporate venture fund to invest in promising neuroscience projects outside the company.

Like several peers, Pfizer has invested heavily in developing treatments for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s because of the huge need, but met disappointment when once-promising compounds failed to work during testing.

Notably, in 2012, Pfizer and partner Johnson & Johnson halted development of an Alzheimer’s drug called bapineuzumab after it failed to slow memory loss in test subjects.

Other companies, such as AstraZeneca PLC, Biogen Inc. and Eli Lilly & Co., keep pursuing Alzheimer’s treatment, but analysts consider the projects very risky.

FT : Saudi Arabia arrests 11 princes over utility bills

Saudi Arabia arrests 11 princes over utility bills
Riyadh says no one is above the law as Prince Mohammed struggles to enforce austerity

Saudi authorities have arrested 11 princes for protesting against the suspension of state subsidies to pay the electricity and water bills of members of the royal family, a rare example of open dissent over recent austerity measures.

The public prosecutor, in a statement late on Saturday, said the group of princes had staged a sit-in at a palace in the capital on Thursday, refusing to leave the area after being told that their demands were not lawful.

The group, now detained in prison ahead of trial on charges related to these offences, were also demanding compensation for one of their cousins, Prince Turki bin Saud al-Kabeer, who was convicted of murder and executed in 2016.

“No one is above the law in Saudi Arabia, everyone is equal and is treated the same as others,” said Saud Al Mojeb, the attorney-general. “Any person, regardless of their status or position, will be held accountable should they decide not to follow the rules and regulations of the state.”

The princely dissent reflects broader antipathy towards the government’s revenue-raising imposed this year, including a 5 per cent sales tax, a doubling of petrol prices and further increases to utility charges.

In the wake of the measures introduced over the new year, Saudis took to social media to complain about the rising cost of living and difficulties in covering their monthly costs.

In response, the authorities on Saturday granted state employees a monthly payment of an extra 1,000 riyals ($267) to help with the burden of new taxes and higher costs.

The royal order acknowledged the “increased burden” on some segments of society, saying the extra measures aim to “soften the impact of economic reform on Saudi households”.

But the decision also risks undermining attempts to diversify the economy away from oil by boosting the private sector’s role in the economy.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the king’s son, has embarked on an ambitious reform programme, seeking to rationalise state spending while launching a wide-ranging privatisation process, anchored in the part-sale of oil giant Saudi Aramco, scheduled for this year.

The economy, buffeted by three years of lower oil prices, fell into recession in 2017, with the private sector reeling from years of lower government spending. The finance ministry has ploughed through state reserves and issued international debt to balance a budget that is projected to be in deficit to the tune of $52bn this year.

The latest royal arrests come after more than 150 princes, businessmen and ministers were detained in Riyadh’s Ritz-Carlton hotel on charges of corruption. Some are now being released, after having paid back money allegedly embezzled from the state. Others are said to have been found innocent of the accusations.

The extraordinary purge, masterminded by Prince Mohammed, has shattered decades of family protocol by publicising grievances previously voiced only in private.

The crackdown — intending to raise $100bn — has won broad appeal among many Saudis fed up with rampant embezzlement among the elite.

Global investors, however, have raised concerns that Prince Mohammed’s purge intends to quell potential opponents within the ruling family and raise revenues for depleted state coffers.

(ZH) Why For Stock Markets Bulls, Monday Could Be "The Most Important Day"

Why For Stock Markets Bulls, Monday Could Be "The Most Important Day"

The holiday-shortened first week of 2018 was the best start to a year for Nasdaq since 2004 with all major indices up every trading day of the year so far.

Between the last week of December and the first week in January, Bloomberg reports that the S&P 500 has reversed direction every year since 2011.

A possible explanation is the expiration of government policies on Dec. 31.
After 4 trading days, the S&P 500 is up 2.6% year-to-date - that is the best start to a year for the S&P since 2006 (and would have been the best weekly gain in 2017).
Critically though, as Ryan Detrick notes, "since 1950, when the first 5 days are up over 2%, the S&P 500 is higher for the year 15 out of 15 times with an average return of +18.6%. "
So, as Detrick concludes, "if you are bullish, Monday is a big day."
Of course, January is another seasonally strong month, with an average total return of +1.2% (+1.1% price return) since 1928. A positive January has historically led to a positive year 86% of the time (80% on a price return basis), with an average total return of +17% (+13% price return). A down January has led to a negative year 47% of the time (56% on a price return basis) with an average total return of +2% (-1% price return).
“This doesn’t mean the index will go straight up from here, but the economic fundamentals are strong enough to support the stocks,” said Phil Orlando, chief equity strategist at Federated Investors.
“Corporate earnings growth has been solid in the last nine months, we expect another double-digits in the fourth quarter. The party is going to continue.”
After setting so many different records last year, SentimentTrader.com's Jason Goepfert expects 2018 to score even more.


Among them, the major indexes haven’t been more than 5% from a 52-week high for nearly 400 days (more than 450 days if we exclude a single day last June).
There were 3 other time periods that matched what we’re seeing now, and after each of them, the S&P 500 declined more than 7% over a period of 30-40 days.
As Bloomberg concludes, long momentum, a strategy that returned the most since 1999 last year, rose the most in more than two years this week.
“It feels like the late phase of a bull market in which investors are capitulating on their reluctance, and joining the party because they cannot identify any downward catalysts,” said Matthew Litfin, portfolio manager of the Columbia Acorn Fund at Columbia Threadneedle Investments.
“Instead, investors now see lower corporate taxes ahead, global economic growth accelerating, and valuation on ‘post-tax-reform earnings’ that is palatable.”
Nope, nothing to see here.
I think we are actually at a point of encouraging risk-taking, and that should give us pause. Investors really do understand now that we will be there to prevent serious losses. It is not that it is easy for them to make money but that they have every incentive to take more risk, and they are doing so. Meanwhile, we look like we are blowing a fixed-income duration bubble right across the credit spectrum that will result in big losses when rates come up down the road. You can almost say that that is our strategy.
Almost!

Barron's : Time to De-FAANG Your Portfolio?

Time to De-FAANG Your Portfolio?

Led by the so-called FaANG stocks, the tech sector soared last year, buoying returns for many mutual fund investors, including those owning Standard & Poor’s 500 index funds.

In 2017, the five stocks— Facebook (ticker: FB), Apple (AAPL), Amazon.com (AMZN), Netflix (NFLX), and Google’s parent, Alphabet (GOOGL)—returned an average 49.2%, versus 22% for the S&P 500.

The FAANG five account for 13% of the S&P. When funds had an even greater proportion of the five than the index, their performance was even better, as the sampling in the nearby table shows.

To see the biggest beneficiaries, we asked Morningstar to run a table of big-cap equity funds with at least 1.5 times the S&P’s weighting of the FAANGs. Then we screened them for the most widely held funds, with at least $300 million of assets. We ranked the funds in terms of exposure to the FAANGs.

As you might suspect, many of the funds bested the benchmark index this year, and often had superior returns for the past three and five years, too.

After such red-hot growth, investors in these funds may now want to consider reducing their exposure to the FAANGs by rebalancing into funds less weighted in technology. But if you want growth over the long term, technology must remain in the picture. A skilled active manager knowledgeable about the sector’s prospects will give greater protection—so long as you bear in mind that the risk of underperformance during a downturn is still there.


And tech, especially big-cap tech, was the standout sector of 2017, notes Bespoke Investment Group. Tech’s multiple expanded to 24.5 times earnings from 21.6, making it the second-most expensive sector in the S&P 500, after energy. Price-to-book value leapt by a fifth, to 5.5 times.

The nosebleed valuations raised questions about the outlook for the FAANGs. In late November, the stocks dipped, as investors worried that rising rates would make long-dated assets look less attractive. Big-cap tech, with slim current earnings and rosy promises of future growth, are some of the longest-dated stocks around.

Big tech also increasingly looks like a possible target for regulation. Another risk is a possible slowdown in consumer spending later this year, which would hurt Amazon, as well as Google, which both depend on online advertising.

Our initial list was topped by a number of index funds, including JNL/Mellon Capital Nasdaq 100. We screened those out, as well as any funds with less than $300 million in assets.

“We obviously have a great deal of conviction in these names,” says Darren Bagwell, manager of Thrivent Large Cap Growth (THLCX), which has the biggest exposure and has owned the stocks for “three to four years.”

Bagwell and his analysts like companies that dominate their categories, with revenues growing at two to three times gross domestic product, and with strong cash flows and low leverage. Bagwell protects his positions by owning them for at least five years. Indeed, he finds it hard to add to his FAANG positions, given their size in the portfolio. “We’ve been far more aggressive about adding fintech stocks,” such as PayPal, he adds.

The actively managed funds were dominated by Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, and portfolios subadvised by Jennison Associates and Wellington Management. All are skilled growth investors that were in the stocks early.

For investors in index funds, “you can’t take diversification for granted,” says Kevin McDevitt, manager research analyst at Morningstar. “Be aware of the bets your fund is making, especially if your fund had a blowout year in 2017,” he notes. “I would seriously consider rebalancing into other funds with less tech exposure if you have a fund with a large tech overweight relative to the market.”

Still, it’s hard not to have exposure to technology. “While I would not recommend chasing 2017’s hot sectors, I do strongly recommend that growth-oriented investors have a significant weighting in technology,” says Jim Lowell of Adviser Investments, an authority on Fidelity funds.

Second on the list was Fidelity OTC (FOCPX), with 28.5% in FAANGs. The fund is steered by new co-managers Christopher Lin and Sonu Kalra, previously top-ranked analysts at Fidelity. Third is Fidelity Advisor Series Opportunistic Insights (FAMGX), with 27.6% in FAANGs, which is run by star manager Will Danoff, who also runs Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX), which has 24% in FAANGs. Fourth is Prudential Jennison Focused Growth (SPFAX), with 26%, run by investment advisor Jennison Associates. A Jennison sibling, Harbor Capital Appreciation (HCAIX), has 22.5% in FAANGs.

These Jennison portfolios and others are steered by Sig Segalas and Kathleen McCarragher, top-ranked fund managers who have held the FAANGs for years. They look for businesses that create economic value over many years, companies with strong balance sheets and research and development, and defensible franchises, benefiting from strong secular growth and network effects. Companies like Facebook and Netflix.

Indeed, when Barron’s profiled Segalas two years ago (“The Market Beaters,” Jan. 9, 2016), he was concerned about big-cap tech valuations. Subsequently, Segalas lightened up on the positions before acquiring them again.

“I really don’t worry too much about other people’s anxiety,” says Lin of Fidelity OTC, which owns companies that can “meaningfully and sustainably” grow earnings over the long term.

“You can actually say that some anxiety is pretty good,” Lin adds. “With every one of these companies, we’ve made the bet that in the future they’ll be able to garner cash flows. That will come to fruition.” That said, “We may over time, reduce some of the larger, more concentrated position sizes.”

The funds look less overexposed if you compare them with the Russell 1000 Growth Index, where the FAANGs account for 19.4%. Morningstar analyst Robby Greengold notes, for example, that Harbor Capital’s Apple position is just 6% of assets, and risk is spread out over 55 stocks.

The FAANGs’ rich valuations is “one of the reasons I love investing in managers, rather than individual stocks,” says Lowell of Adviser Investments, a fan of many of the Fidelity funds that popped up on our list. In particular, Lowell likes Fidelity Contrafund’s Danoff, who has “the right skill sets to maneuver through the next downturn. I’d be more nervous if he were listing bitcoin in his top 10.”

Christopher Mellone, an advisor with VLP Financial Advisors, which owns the T. Rowe Price funds, advises caution and mixing FAANG-heavy funds with value funds to diversify. “We’re not concerned that they’re overvalued,” Mellone says. “That said, the funds are concentrated. Performance will be more volatile than large-cap growth funds.”

There’s still reason to believe that momentum shares will outperform as the market ages. Tech companies are expected to spend money on buybacks as tax changes cause them to repatriate cash. And more than half a trillion dollars is held overseas by tech giants. But after years of outperformance by technology stocks, there’s a good chance that another sector could take the lead. Another fast-growth sector with better valuations—say, biotech.

For those with such fears, it’s probably best to stick with an active manager who can sort through the debris in the market for bargains, or ease up on the FAANG positions when necessary.

WP : Trump boasts that he’s ‘like, really smart’ and a ‘very stable genius’ amid

Trump boasts that he’s ‘like, really smart’ and a ‘very stable genius’ amid questions over his mental fitness

President Trump continued to defend himself in the wake of a new book that suggests top White House aides feared he was unfit for the job.

In a tweetstorm Saturday morning, the president called himself a “very stable genius” and called being “really smart” one of his greatest assets. Trump cited his career in business and reality television and his victory in last year's election as evidence of his mental prowess. And he again lashed out at the ongoing special counsel investigation into his campaign's contacts with Russian operatives, calling suggestions that he colluded with Moscow a “total hoax on the American public.”




Trump's outburst came a day after the public release of a new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, a New York media columnist who said he spent time in the West Wing interviewing top aides as well as Trump.

Wolff paints the picture of a president who is unfit for the job and aides who come to fear Trump is not capable of, or interested in, processing information and making important decisions. Late Friday, Trump blasted Wolff as a “total loser,” and the president mocked his former campaign chairman and White House adviser, Stephen K. Bannon, who was a key source for the book. Bannon criticized other aides and Trump's son, calling a meeting at Trump Tower last year between Donald Jr. and a Russian lawyer “treasonous.”


White House aides have mounted an all-out attack on the book, calling it “fiction” and a “complete fantasy.” And Trump's lawyers sent cease-and-desist letters to Wolff and his publisher demanding that they do not release the book. But the publisher, Henry Holt, moved up the release date from later this month to Friday amid the publicity, and hard copies were quickly sold out in the Washington area.

Reporters asked White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Thursday to respond to suggestions that Trump is mentally unfit for office.

“It's disgraceful and laughable,” she said. “If he was unfit, he probably wouldn't be sitting there and wouldn't have defeated the most qualified group of candidates the Republican Party has ever seen. This is an incredibly strong and good leader. That's why we've had such a successful 2017 and why we're going to continue to do great things as we move forward in this administration.”

>>> Weekly Update - W1

The New Year started with a bang as stocks climbed aggressively and NYSE floor traders donned their ‘Dow 25,000’ hats. President Trump was quick to note the DJIA milestone, providing some distraction from a bad week of PR for the administration after his casual mention of the nuclear option in a tweet aimed at North Korea, and the release of a tell-all book about the White House that painted the President in a bad light and appeared to drive a wedge between him and former chief strategist Steve Bannon

A slightly subpar US December payrolls report did not deter the risk appetite in the markets, and European bourses largely outperformed on the back of more solid data including record low unemployment claims in Germany. The oil market remained bullish as the US Interior Department announced plans to open up more offshore areas to drilling. WTI crude rose to its highest level since June 2016, hitting the $62 handle, while natural gas prices paired last week’s gains as the end is in sight for the arctic freeze gripping half of the US. The bond yield curve continued to flatten, with the 2-10 year spread narrowing to under 50 basis points on Friday. That garnered a prediction from Janus’ Bill Gross that the bond market is headed for a mild bear market. The dollar index continued in last year’s trend, drifting another 0.2% lower. For the week, the S&P500 gained 2.6%, the DJIA added 2.3% and the Nasdaq rose 3.4%

In corporate news this week, Macy’s and JC Penney reported improved sales y/y for the holiday season, and Costco also delivered strong results, handily topping Wall Street SSS estimates. Intel shares dropped after reports broke that its chips are susceptible to a hardware-based exploit and that the security patch could significantly impair performance. In M&A news, Dominion Energy agreed Tuesday to acquire Scana Corp in a deal valued at $14.6B, including debt. Brookfield Business Partners announced it would buy Toshiba’s bankrupt nuclear services company Westinghouse Electric for $4.6B, including assuming the Pittsburgh-based company’s underfunded pension plan. MoneyGram and Ant Financial had to terminate their amended merger agreement thanks to an inability to receive CFIUS approval

>>> Esaote purchase by Chinese consortium may be blocked by Italian government -

Esaote purchase by Chinese consortium may be blocked by Italian government

The takeover by Italian biomedical company Esaote by a Chinese consortium could be blocked by the Italian government, Italian language daily Il Sole 24 Ore reported. The unsourced report claimed that the government is considering using its "golden power" provisions for enterprises deemed strategic to the national interest to either modify the terms and conditions of the Esaote sale or blocking it entirely.
The report said that a technical examination on the matter has already started.
As previously reported, Esaote has revenues of EUR 270m.

FT : Bull or bear? The big issues fund managers face in 2018

Bull or bear? The big issues fund managers face in 2018
Markets appear vulnerable to temporary sell-offs as risks bubble over

After a stellar year for markets in 2017, the world’s largest investors are grappling with a big question: can 2018 deliver the same high returns?

Global stocks generated their best annual performance since the post-crisis recovery on the back of the so-called Goldilocks combination of strong growth and low inflation.

Asset managers would like those “just right” conditions to continue — but some of them are nervous amid fears about the sustainability of high valuations, coupled with inflation and rising interest rates.

Richard Turnill, global chief investment strategist at BlackRock, said: “[Last year] was a near-perfect one for risk assets. The road ahead looks more challenging.”

The consensus is that the issues fund managers are likely to face in 2018 will include a possible change in the investment cycle together with concerns about global growth, rising valuations in the US, inflation and Chinese debt.


Goodbye Goldilocks?
One of the biggest questions is whether we are nearing the end of the post-financial crisis investment cycle. Some investors worry about growth stalling.


Michelle Seitz, chief executive of Russell Investments, the $290bn fund house, said: “After eight years of growth, many of the hallmarks of an ageing business cycle are starting to flash amber.”

But Keith Wade, chief economist at Schroders, said the UK’s second-largest asset manager had upgraded its global growth forecast for 2018 to 3.3 per cent from a previous estimate of 3 per cent. “If correct, this would make 2018 the strongest year for global growth since 2011,” he added.

Mr Turnill believes there will be “stable growth with room to run” in 2018: “We believe the remaining time to this cycle’s peak is likely years. We do see less scope for upside growth surprises as consensus expectations have mostly caught up with our GPS for G7 economies over the past year.”

Running with bulls
Throughout 2017, US President Donald Trump was quick to tweet how US equity markets were at all-time highs. Global stock markets have also done well, with the FTSE All-World index returning almost 22 per cent.


Many investors have benefited from the bull market but question whether sky high valuations can continue.

Stephen Jones, chief investment officer at Kames Capital, said investors should be prepared for a switch in mood. “It is probably naive to anticipate that markets will go up in a straight line as they have last year.”

Ms Seitz said: “Our central view is that equity markets can push higher before facing headwinds later in 2018 as markets factor in rising risks of a 2019 recession. Running with the bulls can be dangerous. It’s easy to get swept up in the elation of the crowd and underestimate the risks.”

Others highlight the bright spots. “Equities may be expensive, particularly in the US, but as long as corporate earnings are going up they’ve still got a way to run,” said Luca Paolini, chief strategist at Pictet Asset Management, the Swiss fund house.

“European, Japanese and [emerging market] equities have even better prospects. The sun is shining especially brightly for eurozone equities.”

Matteo Germano, head of multi asset at Amundi, Europe’s largest-listed fund house, does not foresee any “imminent risks driving a deep market sell-off”.

“We believe [investors] should use the time . . . to recalibrate risks in their portfolios during the year to a more defensive positioning, with a strong focus on quality,” he said.

Rate rises and the unwinding of quantitative easing
Last year marked a change for the long-running policy of central banks pumping money into economies through quantitative easing.

The Federal Reserve, which is slowly raising interest rates, announced that it would gradually begin selling some of its gigantic bond portfolio. Other central banks have also begun increasing interest rates, including the Bank of Canada.

Many investors believe that any further moves to interest rates or quantitative easing programmes will be well signalled by central banks, but some worry the pace of change will be faster than anticipated.

James Elliot, multi-asset chief investment officer at JPMorgan Asset Management, said: “We’ll be closely watching the US rising interest rate environment in 2018 and we think the Fed will move more rapidly than the market currently expects and rates will rise as a consequence.”

Edouard Carmignac, the investor who founded Carmignac, the French investment house, believes investors will “need to prepare well in advance for the upcoming change of liquidity regime”. “Caution and selectivity will be the name of the game in the credit space,” he said.


China worries
Many of the world’s largest investors will be paying close attention to China in 2018, particularly around how the government will maintain growth while dealing with a heavy debt burden.

Johanna Kyrklund, global head of multi-asset investments at Schroders, sees the US dollar playing a big role for China over the next year, with a weak greenback critical for the economy.

“Our expectation is that the US dollar is likely to remain weak as the rest of the world is catching up with US growth. If we are wrong and the US dollar strengthens, however, this would put pressure on Chinese growth and would tighten liquidity,” she said.

John Vail, chief global strategist at Nikko Asset Management, expects China to “grow a bit slower than expected due to the deleveraging, anti-pollution and other campaigns of restraint following President Xi’s consolidation of power”.

But JPMorgan’s Mr Elliot sounded an upbeat note. “GDP growth has surprised positively over the course of 2017 and progress is being made on rebalancing, which suggests growth will be higher quality and more sustainable,” he said.

Inflation
Inflation was one of the biggest issues on investors’ minds in 2017. A poll by Bank of America Merrill Lynch in late 2016 found that 84 per cent of fund managers expected a rise in global inflation.

The concerns, however, were largely unmerited, with inflation remaining low in most global economies.

But Larry Hatheway, chief economist at GAM, the Swiss asset manager, expects a key development in 2018 will be the “potential advent of accelerating inflation”.

“It matters most [of all investment issues] because it is almost entirely unanticipated by markets, yet seems likely from the perspective of macroeconomic conditions,” he said.

“It is also of great significance because unanticipated inflation will lead to major setbacks in both bond and stock markets, with significant aftershocks in almost all asset classes.”

Samy Chaar, chief economist at Lombard Odier, argues that if inflation does creep up during the coming quarters, “financial market volatility should make a comeback and developed market government bonds — an asset class that we have long strongly underweighted — come under further pressure”.

Patrick Moonen, principal strategist for multi asset at NN Investment Partners, the Dutch asset manager, warned that an unexpected surge in inflation would have a negative impact on equity markets.

“If this leads to an economic slowdown, the equities bull market would be in serious trouble due to the combined headwind of lower valuations and lower earnings growth,” he said.

What does this mean for investors?
Mr Turnill believes markets are likely to be more vulnerable to temporary sell-offs this year, sparked by the bubbling over of risks.

“We believe investors will still be compensated for taking risk in 2018 — but receive lower rewards,” he said.

Barron's : One Pro’s Views on the FAANG Five

One Pro’s Views on the FAANG Five


Christopher Lin is co-manager of the Fidelity OTC fund. PHOTO: COURTESY OF FIDELITY

Christopher Lin began his career as a biotech analyst at Fidelity and later worked as a technology analyst, covering Facebook and other internet giants.
Recently, he became co-manager of Fidelity OTC (ticker: FOCPX), a $17.8 billion fund that seeks capital appreciation and normally invests in stocks traded on Nasdaq. Lin felt that the FAANG stocks “were going to have very strong tailwinds a while back.”
In keeping with Fidelity’s internal rules, he declined to provide earnings forecasts or price targets. Still, we asked him to discuss the potential for increased regulation and whether Apple would become a $1 trillion company. Would it buy Netflix? As for Amazon.com, could it ever produce enough earnings to justify its $570 billion market value? And what’s next for Google parent Alphabet as Eric Schmidt steps down as executive chairman?
Here’s what Lin had to say about the five stocks:
Facebook (FB): Will [Danoff, the longtime manager of the $124 billion Fidelity Contrafund] and I thought that engagement and the social network would define the internet age. When we looked at market value of Facebook, and the number of users and amount of time each one was spending on Facebook, we felt revenue per user would go up. We also bet they would get mobile right. We still think pretty much the same thing. People continue to spend a good amount of time on Facebook, and then they could increase their ad prices if they continued to make ads better and more relevant.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg has framed Facebook’s mission as connecting the world. Everybody, including themselves, underestimated how influential they would be. We’ve done quite a lot of work about the range of outcomes regarding increased regulation. Some are negative, some are negligible, and everything else in between.

Amazon.com (AMZN): We doubled down several years ago. Amazon has always been a story about sacrificing margins for revenue and free-cash-flow growth, so during a period when revenues were slowing and margins were shrinking, people were pretty pessimistic. The marketplace of buyers and sellers is very valuable. Unit economics [revenue and costs per unit] were very strong, but they were investing very, very heavily, which was masking a lot of the [potential] profitability. That remains the key debate. Are the unit economics there, or is this an inherently unprofitable company that’s growing very quickly? If we did not think the unit economics were there, there’s no way we would have that large a position. A breakup? The spirit of all competitive law is whether it helps the consumer, usually defined as [lower] consumer prices. What Amazon and e-commerce have done for consumer prices is pretty positive. The second lens is antitrust. Amazon has 3% to 4% of the U.S. retail market. E-commerce in the U.S. is 12% of all commerce [excluding fuel and autos]. In the U.S., Amazon is a quarter or a third of that. I’d be surprised [if the government tried to break up the company], but you can never exclude politics.
Apple (AAPL): This is pretty straightforward. If they come out with really cool new phones, which are 70% of their profits, that make me want to shell out the cash, then, yes, we could get to $1 trillion in market value. The other thing is how well they can grow their services. They’ve done a phenomenal, remarkable job of monetizing the installed base of existing iPhone users, making sure there are a lot of ongoing purchases of music, media, apps, games, and so on.
Can they grow the installed base at the rate they’ve done over the past couple of years? What kind of multiple does one want to pay for that? If you broke out services, it would be an S&P 100 or even an S&P 50 business by itself. This has very large revenues and is an extremely profitable business. So chances are good.
Netflix (NFLX): My starting point for everything is how durable the cash flow is—it must be really sustainable for a long period into the future. If you risk-adjust the cash flow and bring it back to today’s price, it is greater than the market value right now. It was never part of my thesis that they would get bought out. It’s an option. The base probabilistic answer is that it’s unlikely, but always possible. Apple has clearly made some huge hires in the media space, including top guys from Sony Pictures, so they are obviously interested. Amazon is very interested and was rumored to have bid for Netflix [at a price] around 70% or 80% below where it is today. The possibility exists.
Alphabet (GOOGL): They’re thinking about an AI [artificial intelligence]-first world, which is a very interesting way to run a company. Whether they can execute will be the biggest determinant of how well they can do in 2018 and after. Right now, a huge chunk of YouTube watch time is [suggested by] their machine-learning algorithm and their recommender system.] Google uses machine-learning algorithms to determine which ad to insert in which spot and on what page. You see the new voice system, products like Google Photos, which is incredible, and Google Maps, which is increasingly incorporating a lot of voice interaction and also has better navigation and location data.
A lot of people like things that just slowly incorporate more and more and more into their existing products and continuously raise our expectations of them. As for Eric Schmidt, he has been transitioning out of day-to-day management for quite some time. Google can carry on, inspired by his legacy.