Ft : Foreign investors take a fresh look at New York skyline

Foreign investors take a fresh look at New York skyline
Commercial property gains as institutions shift from low-yielding bonds and volatile stocks

For a New York building whose main storefront sits empty, 711 Fifth Avenue has become unusually sought-after.

Kuwaiti pension fund Wafra agreed to pay $909m for the building in late August, well above what many believed it would fetch when Coca-Cola decided late last year to put it on the market.

In the mother of all flips, Wafra then sold its interest this week to BVK, a German pension fund, and a Turkish partner, Bilgili Group.

Whatever else the topsy-turvy sale means, it appears to confirm New York commercial property’s hearty appeal to institutional investors, many foreign, at a time of historically low interest rates around the world.

“On every sizeable deal we offer there are more institutional bidders showing up,” said Douglas Harmon, chairman of capital markets at Cushman & Wakefield, which handled the original sale. “There are more institutions that want to own real estate than ever before.”

Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and their ilk have long been a force in real estate. Yet commercial property appears to be attracting fresh attention at a time when bonds offer so little yield and equity markets have been so volatile.

Private equity groups Blackstone and Brookfield have captured attention in recent months by closing their largest ever property funds — $20bn and $15bn respectively. Beneath those headlines, pension funds in places such as Alaska and Oregon have been quietly increasing their own real estate allocations.

One of the latest moves came from the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, which this month said it would boost its real estate investments from 13 per cent to 15 per cent of its portfolio while dialling back public equities.

A recent survey by the Pension Real Estate Association found that respondents had increased their overall real estate allocation this year from 8.9 per cent to 10 per cent. Half expect to increase that further over the next two years; only 9 per cent expect to cut back.

That chimes with conversations that Jacques Gordon, head of research and strategy at LaSalle Investment Management, is having with investors grappling with the realisation that a fifth of all government bonds produce zero or negative interest rates.

“Clients tell us when they’re holding bonds that are producing no income or negative income, they need us to stay allocated to property and they need us to move upward,” Mr Gordon said.

That is creating a challenge to find worthwhile investment, Mr Gordon added — as “prices keep rising, the yields keep falling”.

There is a rich history of foreign institutions stumbling in New York, the world’s largest and most liquid commercial real estate market. One of the more recent may be Japan’s Unizo Holdings, which is in the midst of shedding its New York portfolio after running into complications.

Chinese investors have also retreated, albeit for other reasons. They bid up landmark properties such as the Waldorf Astoria hotel in 2014 until capital controls imposed by Beijing abruptly dried up the trade and have since turned them into net sellers.

“You need to have a local partner,” according an executive at one New York developer.

It is not clear how the 711 Fifth Avenue transactions will pan out. Coca-Cola has owned the 1927 building since it bought Columbia Pictures in 1982. It sits on a prestigious corner and features prize tenants including the Allen & Co boutique investment bank.

But its retail situation is suffering the same blight as other parts of the city as shoppers move online. Ralph Lauren still pays about $30m in annual rent for most of the building’s ground-floor retail space. Yet sales have been so weak, even on Fifth Avenue, that the company opted two years ago to close the flagship store it built there. The space sits empty even though the lease runs another 10 years.

With that in mind, some local bidders believed the property would go for no more than $700m.

What may have tipped the balance, according to Mr Harmon, was the determination of institutional investors to put their cash to work. He cites the measure of “dry powder” — money investors have committed to real estate funds but which has not yet been deployed. It has roughly doubled over the past four years to $204bn.

To capture a share of it, Cushman sought to cast a wide net beyond the narrow clique of New York developers that once would have been the prime market for 711 Fifth Avenue.

It produced a glossy book to emphasise the building’s history and prime location — features that might give comfort to a foreign buyer. It also provided reams of data on everything from retail rent trends in the surrounding neighbourhood to projected cleaning costs over 10 years. They are the sorts of details demanded by a more deliberate group of investors who may have to appeal to layers of committees before bidding.

“In today’s more institutionalised world, it’s more difficult to pinpoint the obvious, most aggressive bidders for any particular trophy building,” Mr Harmon observed. “It’s a new and more complex game.”

FT : RWE aims to be carbon neutral by 2040

RWE aims to be carbon neutral by 2040
German utility to close all of its conventional power stations in the next 2 decades

Europe’s biggest producer of carbon dioxide emissions has pledged to become carbon neutral by 2040.

The move by RWE highlights the radical transformation of the German utility, which has long been one of the prime targets of climate activists and that currently runs some of the largest and dirtiest coal power stations on the continent. 

“Today begins the era of the new RWE,” said Rolf Martin Schmitz, chief executive, at an event in Essen to present the group’s plans. “Every energy has its time. Now comes the era of renewables.” 

The pledge comes just weeks after European regulators signed off on a €43bn asset swap deal between RWE and its rival Eon that will reorder the German energy market. 

Under the terms of the 2018 deal, RWE will take over all the renewables assets of both Eon and Innogy, an RWE subsidiary that will be acquired by Eon. The transaction will make RWE the third-largest renewables group in Europe, and the second-largest in the market for offshore wind power. RWE has said it plans to invest €1.5bn a year in additional renewables capacity. 

However, to meet its climate goal, RWE will have to shutter all its conventional power stations over the next two decades. In Germany, the group’s home market, the government has already announced that it wants all coal power stations to close by 2038 at the latest — two years ahead of the RWE target. According to Mr Schmitz, that still leaves the challenge of how to replace the group’s gas-powered stations: “We think this [2040 target] is more than ambitious,” he said. 

Environmental campaigners, however, were unimpressed.

“RWE is trying to sell the inevitable as climate protection,” said Karsten Smid, an energy expert at Greenpeace. “European climate goals and the growing efficiency of renewables mean that the last coal power station will have to be closed long before 2040.” 

To make a real contribution to the fight against climate change, Mr Smid added, RWE should agree to close down all its coal power stations by 2030. 

RWE has long been among the top targets of climate activists, in part as a result of a long-running, high-profile battle to preserve a forest in western Germany that is threatened by the planned expansion of one of the group’s lignite mines. RWE also operates some of the largest coal-fired power stations in all of Europe.

According to a study by Carbon Market Data, which is based on data from the EU emissions trading system, RWE was the largest producer of CO2 emissions in Europe last year. 

Speaking on Monday, Mr Schmitz insisted that RWE had made important strides already in its effort to lower carbon emissions. “Between 2012 an 2018 we reduced CO2 emissions at RWE by 60m tonnes. That is a cut of a third, and is equivalent to the annual CO2 emissions of 30m cars,” he said. 

RWE plans to lower carbon emissions by 70 per cent by 2030, compared with 2012 levels. 

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

Gapping up:

  • NWL +3.7%, BBBY +3.5%, URBN +3.1%, EDU +3%, BZUN +2.9%, JKS +2.4%, JD +2.3%, BABA +2.3%, MOMO +2.2%, WUBA +2.2%, BIDU +2%, CI +1.8%, TAL +1.7%, WB +1.5%, CTRP +1.4%, PYPL +1%, ASML +0.9%, GSK +0.7%, PAAS +0.7%, AMD +0.6%, AAPL +0.6%

Gapping down:

  • IMMU -5.7%, EGHT -4.7%, AU -2.5%, HL -2.1%, MDR -2%, IAG -1.9%, PLG -1.9%, GFI -1.6%, KGC -1.5%, SLV -1.5%, GOLD -1.4%, NVS -1.2%, GDX -1.1%, UNH -1%, HMY -1%, RDS.A -1%, AZN -0.9%, BHP -0.7%, BBL -0.7%, SBGL -0.7%, NEM -0.6%, GLD -0.6%

Electrek : Tesla is ‘a few thousand’ cars short of its delivery goal with a day

Tesla is ‘a few thousand’ cars short of its delivery goal with a day left

Tesla is trying to deliver a record 100,000 cars during the third quarter and with only a day left, sources say that Tesla is currently ‘a few thousand’ cars short of the delivery goal.
Last week, we reported that Elon Musk sent out an email to employees to say that Tesla ‘has a shot’ at delivering a record 100,000 cars this quarter.

The CEO said that net new orders were tracking at 110,000 cars for the quarter and the difficulty is going to be getting the vehicles in the hands of customers in time for the end of the quarter.

Tesla management has been keeping the actual progress numbers toward the goal secret, but sources say that they have communicated to employees last night that they were “a few thousands” short of the goal with a day left in the quarter.

It is not impossible for them to reach the goal at this point, but it will be extremely difficult.

Sources told Electrek that Tesla has about 3,000 vehicles in inventory throughout North America, but they are not all at the delivery centers ready to be matched with a customer ready to take delivery.

Therefore, Tesla would be lucky to deliver 500 to 1,000 of these vehicles in North America during the last day of the quarter.

Electrek doesn’t have information about inventory in international markets, which could make the difference during the last day.

Some markets like China, Norway, the Netherlands, the UK, and Australia, have each been delivering hundreds of cars during some days this quarter.

We will report back if we get more information later today. Otherwise, Tesla is expected to release the official delivery numbers later this week.

Electrek’s Take
I understand that this is kind of vague, but Tesla is being a lot more careful about the information it is giving employees this quarter.

I suppose it all depends on how many they mean by “a few thousands”. In my opinion, it has to be between 2,000 and 5,000 units.

The latter is achievable, but the former would be almost impossible.

But I think another question is “do they really need to deliver 100,000 cars?”

I agree that it would be an incredible milestone and it would help them look better based on Wall Street’s twisted quarterly way to look at things, but I am not sure it’s worth the incredible stress that Tesla is putting on employees at the end of every quarter.

In turn, it is inevitably resulting in worse customer service as employees have to spend a lot less time with buyers taking delivery.

Elon said a few times now that he was working on changing that, but they end up at the same place every quarter just with bigger numbers.

I think the start of production at Gigafactory 3 could help. The new production capacity should enable a more steady flow of vehicles throughout the quarter and alleviate the end of the quarter rush.

What do you think? Let us know in the comment section below.

Don’t have a Tesla or want another one? You can win your own brand new Tesla Model X P100D with $20,000 in the trunk by participating in the Omaze raffle that helps GivePower build a solar-powered desalination system in Haiti.

>>> What to look at today - 30th of September 2019

Stocks kicked off the week in mixed fashion on Monday, with a slump in Japanese shares contrasting with more muted moves elsewhere. Treasuries were little changed after gains at the end of last week.
Japan’s stocks opened with a thud as investors took in the latest escalation in trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies -- news that the Trump administration has discussed curbing China’s access to U.S. finance. China’s stocks edged lower in the final session before an important week-long holiday, though the yuan rose offshore. The dollar was little changed, while oil was around $56 a barrel in New York.

Nikkei -0.87% Hang Seng +0.60% CSI -0.14% Shanghai -0.05% Shenzen -0.09%

Eur$ 1.0936 CNY 7.1269 GBP 1.2293

S&P =0.35% EuroStoxx -0.11% Dax-0.05% FTSE -.20% SMI +0.05%

Macro :
- Saudi King’s Bodyguard Is Killed in ‘Personal Dispute’
- Johnson Won’t Resign If Exit Day Is Delayed: Brexit Update
- Wall Street Falls in Love Again With Companies Loaded Up on Debt
- Lagarde Inherits ECB Tinged by Bitterness of Draghi Stimulus
- Italian Government Weighs Budget Measures Before Monday Meeting


Keep an eye on :
- ABBV US : AbbVie Faces Extended U.S. Antitrust Review for Allergan Deal, Omnicom Cuts Ties With Juul: Ad Age
- BATS LN : Washington Governor Calls for Ban on All Flavored Vapor Products
- BON FP : Bonduelle Sees 2019-20 Revenue Growth at 1.5% to 2.5%
- CSGN SW : Credit Suisse Star Told CEO ‘Give me Asia or I’m Gone,’ : Blick
- EDF FP : *FRANCE'S LE MAIRE SAYS EDF AUDIT RESULTS READY OCT. 31
- EDP PL : EDP Signs Agreement to Sell Energy From Mexican Wind Project
- EQNR NO : Equinor Ahead of Schedule to Reach Renewable Target, DN Reports
- EVT GY : Evotec, Indivumed Achieve Milestone in Drug Discovery Pact
- KPN NA : KPN Pulls Leroy CEO Appointment Amid Share Sale Probe (2)
- MCRO LN : Micro Focus Gains After DealReporter Discusses PE Interest
- NOKIA FH : KDDI Selects Nokia as Primary Partner to Upgrade Network to 5G
- NOVN SW : Novartis’ Kisqali Meets OS Secondary Endpoint in Phase 3
- NOVN SW : Novartis Asthma Drug Meets Primary, Misses Secondary Endpoint
- PUB FP : Omnicom Cuts Ties With Juul: Ad Age
- CFR SW :
- SAN FP : Sobi Expands Agreement With Sanofi on Haemophilia Treatment
- SBMO NA : SBM to Take Part in Auction for Minority In Operated Companies
- SRCG SW : Sunrise to ‘Significantly Reduce’ Rights Issue to CHF2.8b
- SWEDA SS : Swedbank, Nordea Clients Are Least Happy in Swedish Bank Ranking

>>> Europe Brokers Upgrdes & Downgrades - 30th of September 2019

>>> Up
* BCP Upgraded to Buy at JB Capital Markets; PT 29 Cents
* Bouygues Upgraded to Overweight at Barclays; PT 44 Euros
* DNB Upgraded to Buy at Berenberg
* Homeserve Upgraded to Outperform at RBC; PT 15 Pounds
* Investor AB Upgraded to Add at AlphaValue
* SSE Upgraded to Equal-weight at Barclays; PT 13 Pounds

>>> Down
* ABN AMRO Bank GDRs Downgraded to Outperform at RBC; PT 21 Euros
* Cellnex Cut to Equal-weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 41 Euros
* Demant Downgraded to Add at AlphaValue
* Mediobanca Downgraded to Reduce at AlphaValue
* Pearson Downgraded to Reduce at AlphaValue
* PowerCell Sweden Cut to Hold at Pareto Securities; PT 105 Kronor
* Salzgitter Downgraded to Sell at AlphaValue
* Valora Downgraded to Underperform at MainFirst; PT 240 Francs
* Whitbread Cut to Equal-weight at Barclays; PT 43.50 Pounds

>>> Initiation
* Abcam Rated New Hold at Liberum; PT 12.30 Pounds
* Cello Health Rated New Hold at Liberum; PT 1.35 Pounds
* Clinigen Rated New Hold at Liberum; PT 10 Pounds
* Huntsworth Rated New Buy at Liberum; PT 1.20 Pounds
* Novozymes Downgraded to Underweight at JPMorgan; PT 270 Kroner
* Oxford Biomedica Rated New Buy at Liberum; PT 8.10 Pounds

>>> Call
* DNB’s Valuation Is Undemanding, Stock Upgraded at Berenberg
* Marks & Spencer’s Problems Remain, PT to Street-Low: Berenberg
* Take Profits in Cellnex After Strong Gains, Morgan Stanley Says

FT :Power couples: the Neumann factor

Power couples: the Neumann factor
Investors want bosses to work together, not live together

Business power couples have received a bad rap lately. WeWork chief executive Adam Neumann and his wife, co-founder and “strategic thought partner” Rebekah, appeared to encourage one another’s eccentricities. Mrs Neumann reportedly demanded employees with “bad energy” should be sacked. Both are now stepping down from executive roles.

Investors want bosses to work together, not live together. Elizabeth O’Connell recently switched jobs at UK-listed litigation funder Burford following criticism from a US short-seller. Muddy Waters saw Ms O’Connell’s combined role — finance director and wife to chief executive Christopher Bogart — as a governance failing. Vernon Hill, co-founder of struggling Metro Bank, took flak for contracting wife Shirley’s business to design its wildly overspecified branches (lots of marble, free dog biscuits).

In theory, a successful private relationships should translate to the workplace. Trust and familiarity should raise productivity. Coupled-up founders should share goals and eschew rivalry. Family duties should be covered more flexibly.

Kevin and Julia Hartz credit their partnership with helping them start Eventbrite in 2006. The married couple now occupy the chair and chief executive roles respectively in the $1.5bn company. That has not stopped shares shedding more than half since last year’s initial public offering.

A study of Danish entrepreneurial couples in the decade to 2010 suggests fruitful partnerships are no rarity. Businesses started by couples achieved the same profits as businesses started by two people who were not in a relationship, despite lower sales. The incomes of entrepreneurial couples rise faster than those of couples where only one person started the business.

Metro Bank and Burford are listed in the UK and WeWork planned to float in the US. In public companies, executives are expected to serve shareholders’ interests above all. Marriage to another boss could make that harder. A chief executive might avoid firing her chief financial officer/husband, for example. The frosty silence during the car ride home would beat any froideur following a fractious dinner party.

The good news is that couples who start businesses together are no more likely to divorce or feel miserable than those who do not. Mr and Mrs Neumann no longer work together. He is switching to chairman. She is reportedly leaving. They can still enjoy a relationship brimming with the positive energy both espouse.

FT : Are investors ready for the ‘Doomsday Dollar’ scenario?

Are investors ready for the ‘Doomsday Dollar’ scenario?
What would it mean if the entire paradigm for long-term investing was to change?

For decades, global savers, and American retirement savers in particular, have been taught that you should put most of your money in an S&P index fund — one that tracked the fortunes of the largest US companies — and then forget about it until you were close to retirement. Since the mid-1980s onwards, that has been more or less good advice. American multinationals were, after all, the best way to buy into globalisation, and globalisation was very good for the stock prices of many big companies.

But recently, I’ve begun to wonder — what would it mean if the entire paradigm for long-term investing was to change?

Globalisation as we have known it is on hold. This much we know. But what if we were also coming to the end of a very long period of financial repression, in which declining interest rates have masked another, more fundamental truth. America’s place in the world has changed, and so has the growth potential of its corporations. If that is the case, then we may be in for a correction not just in the stock prices of US multinationals, but in the dollar itself. That would have profound implications for investors everywhere — from individual savers in the US to giant pension funds in Europe and Asia.

It’s a scenario that AG Bisset Associates has dubbed “the Doomsday Dollar”. At first glance, the idea of US stocks and the dollar going down at the same time seems unlikely. For one thing, the two often go in opposite directions, with a weak dollar making the exports of many US companies relatively more competitive in the global marketplace, as has been the case in recent years.

What’s more, despite some countries like China and Russia moving out of dollar-denominated assets for reasons both political and economic, the dollar remains the world’s reserve currency. As a study last week from the Brookings Institution pointed out, the dollar’s share of global foreign exchange reserves has declined by only two percentage points since 2007, while the euro’s share is down six points. And, as we all know, neither American politicians nor many of the country’s largest companies have covered themselves in glory during that period.


But shifts in the global reserve system take time. Currency movements can happen more quickly — in fact, as Ulf Lindahl, AG Bisset chief executive, points out, the world’s major currencies tend to move up and down in 15-year cycles. According to his calculations, which track currency movements from the early 1970s onwards, we began a new cycle in January 2017, and despite the dollar’s strength since April 2018, that cycle is still intact. If the thesis holds, the dollar is poised to fall against the euro and yen over the next few years, and by as much as 50 to 60 per cent.

What would be the implications of such a shift? For starters, investors outside the US, like European and Japanese pension funds, the family offices that manage the finances of wealthy individuals, and large financial institutions, would be hit hard by depreciating dollar assets. If they began to shift their investment portfolios away from dollar assets, it could exacerbate a downturn in US equities — this is something that many analysts believe is coming anyway, given that stocks are at their second most expensive period in 150 years. That would, in turn, hurt US savers who keep the majority of their retirement portfolios in those S&P index funds.

Some savvy investors already see the writing on the wall and have moved into gold. I would expect other commodities to rise, too.

If the “Doomsday” scenario plays out, investors might also pile into the euro and the yen, which would force US bond yields to rise. That is something that few expect — the conventional wisdom is that we are in an environment of low rates forever. But if yields were to rise, it could help savers who are holding bonds rather than stocks — it would also, however, penalise debt-ridden companies. And as we have already been warned by the Bank for International Settlements, there are plenty of “zombie” firms out there that will have trouble servicing their debt and staying in business if rates rise.

Over the past few decades, we’ve seen not only a bull market for US equities, but plenty of financial engineering. Companies have done what they could to defy economic gravity using everything from the tax code to share buybacks. Central bankers have facilitated this with loose monetary policy. That is why, in my opinion, both US stocks and dollar-denominated asset prices have remained so high, despite so many risk factors in the political economy, and the challenges for business.

Ultimately, if US companies are perceived as no longer being the most competitive in the world, their share price will fall, as will the dollar. Are we at that point? Not yet. But given the erosion of America’s skills base, its ailing infrastructure and lack of research investment, I wonder if we might be soon.

Companies themselves seem to be voting with their feet. A recent EY report shows that the number of Fortune Global 500 companies headquartered in the US declined from 179 in 2000 to 121, while the number headquartered in China grew from 10 to 119. This signals a shift in where companies expect growth to come from in the future — Asia. If that is the case, many of us will need a new investment strategy for a new world.

(Quartzy) Sneakers are set to outsell “fashion” footwear in the US for the first

Sneakers are set to outsell “fashion” footwear in the US for the first time - http://bit.ly/2nCDumm

When the sneaker industry got going around the middle of the 19th century, the shoes were a niche product—footwear for the rich sport of lawn tennis (hence the enduring term “tennis shoes”).

By now they’ve so far transcended just athletic use that market-research firm NPD Group forecasts “sport leisure” sneakers—the casual sort, as opposed to performance shoes meant specifically for athletic use—will become the largest footwear category in the US in 2020. The incumbent front runner they’ll overtake is what NPD calls “fashion” footwear, a category including most of everything else: shoes, boots, sandals, and slippers.

It will mark a major milestone for sneakers, not least of all because the US is one of the world’s two biggest fashion markets. Sneakers have become integral to the way people dress (Quartz member exclusive). They’re so ubiquitous that it may surprise some to learn casual sneakers weren’t already the top category recorded by NPD. But the shoes had a lot of ground to make up. Sneaker makers also haven’t historically paid as much attention as they could have to women, a large and valuable customer group, and as indicated, their numbers also don’t include performance sneakers, for good reason.

Many of the shoes may have begun as athletic footwear, but sports are no longer their main purpose, as in the case of shoes like the Nike Air Force 1, retro Jordans, or Converse All Stars. Others were never intended for sports to begin with, such as Allbirds or Yeezys. NPD’s prediction is that styles with their original roots in running and basketball will lead sport leisure’s growth, most of it coming from the men’s and kids’ markets.

The impending dominance of these lifestyle sneakers is due to the ascent of athleisure, which you could describe as the recent pronounced uptick in a century-long process that’s brought sports clothing into our everyday wardrobes as clothes get more casual and comfort becomes an ever-greater priority. Americans are embracing healthy lifestyles, but are also less committed to specific sports, explained Matt Powell, NPD’s senior industry adviser for sports. They want shoes that are versatile, comfortable, and functional across their everyday lives, allowing them to go to work or the gym without having to change. As a consequence they’re less interested in sport-specific technical performance, which is why last year casual sneakers became the top-selling sneaker category in the US.

This shift is happening at the expense of performance and fashion footwear. According to NPD’s data, which tracks sales across most of US retail—though not direct-to-consumer sales by brands—sport leisure grew through the 12 months ended in August. Sales of both fashion and performance footwear declined. (If you do take into account direct sales by sneaker brands, casual sneakers could overtake fashion footwear even sooner as those sales are quickly on the rise.) It even forecasts that the shift to more sport-inspired shoes is going to have a chilling effect on sales of “the thong, flip-flop, and ballerina segments.”

Sport-inspired casual shoes seem likely to widen their lead over non-sport styles through 2021. Next year, NPD predicts sport leisure sales will exceed those of fashion footwear by about 3%. The following year, it will widen to about 8%.