TechCrunch : Meta wants to get into the electricity trading business

Meta wants to get into the electricity trading business

In order to accelerate the construction of new power plants needed to provide energy for its data centers, Meta is looking to get into the business of trading electricity.

Bloomberg reports that both Meta and Microsoft are asking for federal approval to trade power (Apple has already received this approval). According to Meta, this will allow it to make long-term commitments to buy electricity from new plants, while mitigating the risk by having the ability to resell some of that power on wholesale power markets.

Meta’s head of global energy, Urvi Parekh, told Bloomberg that power plant developers “want to know that the consumers of power are willing to put skin in the game.”

“Without Meta taking a more active voice in the need to expand the amount of power that’s on the system, it’s not happening as quickly as we would like,” Parekh said.

As an example of the unprecedented energy needs underlying tech companies’ ambitious AI data center plans, Bloomberg notes that at least three new gas-powered plants will need to be built to power Meta’s Louisiana data center campus.

TechCrunch : Waymo gets regulatory approval to expand across Bay Area and Southe

Waymo gets regulatory approval to expand across Bay Area and Southern California

Waymo continues to expand its reach, with the robotaxi company posting Friday that it’s now “officially authorized to drive fully autonomously across more of the Golden State.”

Waymo already operates in San Francisco, Silicon Valley, and Los Angeles (and outside California as well, in Atlanta, Austin, and Phoenix). But maps published by California’s Department of Motor Vehicles showed that the company can now test and deploy its autonomous vehicles across a much larger area in both the Bay Area and Southern California.

In the Bay Area, Waymo’s approved areas of operation now include most of the East Bay and North Bay (including Napa/Wine Country), as well as Sacramento. In Southern California, the company’s approved territory now stretches from Santa Clarita (north of Los Angeles) to San Diego.


The company will need additional regulatory approval before it can carry paying passengers in some of these regions, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

Although Waymo’s post doesn’t offer many details about when it plans to actually start offering rides in all these new areas, the company wrote, “Next stop: welcoming riders in San Diego in mid-2026!”

The company had previously announced its intention to launch in San Diego next year, along with Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Las Vegas, Miami, Nashville, Orlando, San Antonio, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.

There’s been plenty of Waymo expansion news in the past couple weeks, as the company announced that it will be entering Minneapolis, New Orleans, and Tampa; is removing safety drivers ahead of its commercial launch in Miami; and will start offering rides that use freeways in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Phoenix.

We discussed the growth of Waymo and other robotaxi companies on the latest episode of the Equity podcast. My co-host Sean O’Kane noted that as Waymo begins to provide more unfettered access across the Bay Area, people could be spending a lot more time in their robotaxis — so we might see them using the service in new, weird, or even dangerous ways.

NYT : What OpenAI Did When ChatGPT Users Lost Touch With Reality

What OpenAI Did When ChatGPT Users Lost Touch With Reality
In tweaking its chatbot to appeal to more people, OpenAI made it riskier for some of them. Now the company has made its chatbot safer. Will that undermine its quest for growth?

It sounds like science fiction: A company turns a dial on a product used by hundreds of millions of people and inadvertently destabilizes some of their minds. But that is essentially what happened at OpenAI this year.

One of the first signs came in March. Sam Altman, the chief executive, and other company leaders got an influx of puzzling emails from people who were having incredible conversations with ChatGPT. These people said the company’s A.I. chatbot understood them as no person ever had and was shedding light on mysteries of the universe.

Mr. Altman forwarded the messages to a few lieutenants and asked them to look into it.

“That got it on our radar as something we should be paying attention to in terms of this new behavior we hadn’t seen before,” said Jason Kwon, OpenAI’s chief strategy officer.

It was a warning that something was wrong with the chatbot.

For many people, ChatGPT was a better version of Google, able to answer any question under the sun in a comprehensive and humanlike way. OpenAI was continually improving the chatbot’s personality, memory and intelligence. But a series of updates earlier this year that increased usage of ChatGPT made it different. The chatbot wanted to chat.

It started acting like a friend and a confidant. It told users that it understood them, that their ideas were brilliant and that it could assist them in whatever they wanted to achieve. It offered to help them talk to spirits, or build a force field vest or plan a suicide.

The lucky ones were caught in its spell for just a few hours; for others, the effects lasted for weeks or months. OpenAI did not see the scale at which disturbing conversations were happening. Its investigations team was looking for problems like fraud, foreign influence operations or, as required by law, child exploitation materials. The company was not yet searching through conversations for indications of self-harm or psychological distress.

Creating a bewitching chatbot — or any chatbot — was not the original purpose of OpenAI. Founded in 2015 as a nonprofit and staffed with machine learning experts who cared deeply about A.I. safety, it wanted to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefited humanity. In late 2022, a slapdash demonstration of an A.I.-powered assistant called ChatGPT captured the world’s attention and transformed the company into a surprise tech juggernaut now valued at $500 billion.

The three years since have been chaotic, exhilarating and nerve-racking for those who work at OpenAI. The board fired and rehired Mr. Altman. Unprepared for selling a consumer product to millions of customers, OpenAI rapidly hired thousands of people, many from tech giants that aim to keep users glued to a screen. Last month, it adopted a new for-profit structure.

As the company was growing, its novel, mind-bending technology started affecting users in unexpected ways. Now, a company built around the concept of safe, beneficial A.I. faces five wrongful death lawsuits.

To understand how this happened, The New York Times interviewed more than 40 current and former OpenAI employees — executives, safety engineers, researchers. Some of these people spoke with the company’s approval, and have been working to make ChatGPT safer. Others spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared losing their jobs.

OpenAI is under enormous pressure to justify its sky-high valuation and the billions of dollars it needs from investors for very expensive talent, computer chips and data centers. When ChatGPT became the fastest-growing consumer product in history with 800 million weekly users, it set off an A.I. boom that has put OpenAI into direct competition with tech behemoths like Google.

Until its A.I. can accomplish some incredible feat — say, generating a cure for cancer — success is partly defined by turning ChatGPT into a lucrative business. That means continually increasing how many people use and pay for it.

“Healthy engagement” is how the company describes its aim. “We are building ChatGPT to help users thrive and reach their goals,” Hannah Wong, OpenAI’s spokeswoman, said. “We also pay attention to whether users return because that shows ChatGPT is useful enough to come back to.”

The company turned a dial this year that made usage go up, but with risks to some users. OpenAI is now seeking the optimal setting that will attract more users without sending them spiraling.

A Sycophantic Update
Earlier this year, at just 30 years old, Nick Turley became the head of ChatGPT. He had joined OpenAI in the summer of 2022 to help the company develop moneymaking products, and mere months after his arrival, was part of the team that released ChatGPT.

Mr. Turley wasn’t like OpenAI’s old guard of A.I. wonks. He was a product guy who had done stints at Dropbox and Instacart. His expertise was making technology that people wanted to use, and improving it on the fly. To do that, OpenAI needed metrics.

In early 2023, Mr. Turley said in an interview, OpenAI contracted an audience measurement company — which it has since acquired — to track a number of things, including how often people were using ChatGPT each hour, day, week and month.

“This was controversial at the time,” Mr. Turley said. Previously, what mattered was whether researchers’ cutting-edge A.I. demonstrations, like the image generation tool DALL-E, impressed. “They’re like, ‘Why would it matter if people use the thing or not?’” he said.

It did matter to Mr. Turley and the product team. The rate of people returning to the chatbot daily or weekly had become an important measuring stick by April 2025, when Mr. Turley was overseeing an update to GPT-4o, the model of the chatbot people got by default.

Updates took a tremendous amount of effort. For the one in April, engineers created many new versions of GPT-4o — all with slightly different recipes to make it better at science, coding and fuzzier traits, like intuition. They had also been working to improve the chatbot’s memory.

The many update candidates were narrowed down to a handful that scored highest on intelligence and safety evaluations. When those were rolled out to some users for a standard industry practice called A/B testing, the standout was a version that came to be called HH internally. Users preferred its responses and were more likely to come back to it daily, according to four employees at the company.

WSJ : AI Investors Want More Making It and Less Faking It

AI Investors Want More Making It and Less Faking It
Lackluster responses to Nvidia results and the chip maker’s deal with Anthropic point to a worsening environment

Silicon Valley’s startup model encourages “a fake it until you make it” strategy: Pretend to be successful to attract the coders, venture capitalists and customers that bring actual success.

Artificial intelligence took the idea to an extreme, and investors are catching on.

The hustle rests on one basic flaw in the current approach: Providing AI services costs more than customers pay, so the more customers companies attract, the more they lose.

The hope is that by focusing on the number of customers—each one subsidized by shareholders—the companies can create a virtuous circle. Rising use excites investors who put in more money and push up the company’s valuation.

This allows the companies to hire coders, part paid with stock, to subsidize even more customers and, crucially, to spend big on the infrastructure they hope will eventually allow them to develop better products for which customers will pay full price. Voilà! The faking it leads to making it, and everyone involved is a winner.

The flaw is that investors already realize what’s going on. They may conclude that they don’t want to pay the big costs needed to get to the deeply uncertain end point. The drop in AI infrastructure shares this month shows that caution is setting in.


Two events this week illustrate the worsening environment for AI. First, Nvidia and Microsoft pledged to invest $15 billion between them into Anthropic, the No. 2 large language model developer. In turn, it promised to buy $30 billion of computing capacity from Microsoft, using Nvidia NVDA -0.97%decrease; red down pointing triangle chips. This sort of circular deal had led to a nice bump in all the stocks involved in the past—but on Wednesday, nada.

Second, Nvidia’s better-than-expected results were hailed by many investors and commentators as proof that there isn’t an AI bubble, and the stock jumped more than 5% on Thursday morning, while smaller AI-related stocks soared. It only took until that afternoon for people to realize that the argument was daft. Sure, Nvidia is selling a lot of chips—but that’s an essential part of the infrastructure spending in the faking it stage, and if there’s a bubble, this is exactly what you should expect. The stock closed down, with a huge price swing not seen since the April tariff selloff.

None of this is helped by the parallel selloff in stocks popular with individual traders, many of whom are being hammered by losses on crypto, or by fading hopes of a December rate cut from the Federal Reserve. Trader psychology flipped on Thursday from buy-the-dip to sell-the-rip, which is unpleasant for markets, especially as upward momentum turns downward.

But the core of the AI debate is whether all the spending on chips and research will eventually lead to big enough profits to justify the huge outlays.


Markets are in the process of shifting from treating the answer as an obvious Yes to being slightly more cautious. There’s no sign that they’ve concluded the answer is No: Nvidia shares are still up a third this year, Microsoft 14% and crypto-to-cloud stock CoreWeave almost 80% from its March IPO. The S&P 500 is down only 4.6% from its intraday high last month, hardly an unusual move.

Rather, there’s a shift in the timeline. Investors are less keen on spending heavily now in the hope that in the distant future we get properly intelligent machines able to outperform humans. They are more keen on finding ways to make money from AI in the near term. This is one reason Alphabet, which has concentrated on corporate sales of existing products, has been virtually immune to the selloff.

Investors want a bit less faking it and a bit more making it. That’s bad news for those focused on grand hopes for the far-distant future, like Meta Platforms or OpenAI, and those selling them data centers. But, so far at least, it’s not the AI bubble popping.

FT Lex : Queueing is not a virtue when it comes to building data centres

Queueing is not a virtue when it comes to building data centres
Builders of facilities that power AI are stuck in a snaking queue to connect to the UK grid but stamping out gaming of the system could help

As a nation, the UK holds queues in high regard. To those watching from abroad, the 10-mile line to view Queen Elizabeth II’s lying-in-state seemed almost as quintessentially British as the sovereign herself. Yet it doesn’t always make sense to allocate scarce resources on a first-come-first-served basis. The rush to build data centres is an example.

Builders of facilities that power artificial intelligence — which Britain views as crucial to its economic growth — are stuck in a snaking queue to connect to the electricity grid. At the last count, the combined needs of those awaiting connections, many of them data centres, had more than tripled in a year, to 125 gigawatts. Wait times are between 8 and 10 years, thinks consultancy Ember Energy. Some face more than a decade. 


That’s disastrous for a sector engaged in a land-grab. Countries with shorter wait times, such as the Nordics and Italy, are expected to attract a greater share of hyperscalers’ money. The idea of data centres — and thus data — escaping to other countries also raises national concerns about security and resilience.

Britain can, though, speed things up, by stamping out gaming of the system. The ever-lengthening queue incentivises even those without firm projects to apply for a connection. The energy system operator has already started to address a similar issue on the supply queue — those lining up to provide new power generation to the grid — and is likely to impose requirements for queue entry and membership.

Even so there will still be more real ones than the grid can accommodate. So another idea is to let the hyperscalers build their own ‘micro-grids’, with their own power generation and their own batteries, to be gradually subsumed into the national electricity network over time.

This is a smart workaround, and not just because it makes it more likely that data centre infrastructure will actually get built. Those generating their own power may be allowed to jump the queue and hook up to the national grid too, on the understanding that they will barely need to use it. But that two-way connection means that in times when they are producing more power than they need, they can feed some back into the wider pool.

A free-for-all does have drawbacks. Data centre builders may lean on gas-fired generation as a quick fix, at least initially, slowing the country’s progress towards decarbonisation. But the regulator could steer them towards renewables where that’s possible, and insist power sources are replaced with greener alternatives once available. The alternative is for the country’s AI ambitions to remain gridlocked. Uncomfortable as it may seem, some queue-barging is justified.

>>> Weekend Papers Summary

FINANCIAL TIMES
-The Trump administration has informed Ukrainian and European officials that there is limited flexibility regarding its plan to conclude Russia's war, pressuring Volodymyr Zelenskyy to agree to a deal facilitated by Moscow by Thursday. During a tense meeting in Kyiv, US Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll expressed optimism about the potential for peace but emphasized that the US would not negotiate the details of the plan. The meeting, which was perceived as negative by some European officials, coincided with President Donald Trump's remarks suggesting Ukraine must accept Washington's terms. This prompted urgent discussions among European leaders at the G20 summit in Johannesburg regarding interventions to support Ukraine. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that allies would meet during the summit to negotiate a full ceasefire and enhance the current proposal in support of Trump's peace effort.
-On Friday, at the White House, Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City, engaged in an unexpected and amicable meeting in the Oval Office. The two leaders, despite their previous contentious exchanges—Trump labeling Mamdani as a Democratic socialist and Mamdani criticizing Trump as a “despot”—expressed mutual respect following their discussions focused on the affordability crisis affecting New Yorkers. Trump remarked on their shared love for the city, saying he felt comfortable with Mamdani as mayor, while Mamdani expressed appreciation for the productive dialogue, highlighting their common goal of improving New York City's affordability. This meeting, which diverged from expectations of confrontational exchanges, marked a significant moment of cooperation between the divergent political figures.
-The Kremlin is shifting the blame to the West for an upcoming tax increase aimed at protecting Vladimir Putin from backlash over the negative impact of the war economy on ordinary Russians. High-ranking officials, including Sergei Kirienko, participated in discussions prior to the new budget law, which raises the value-added tax (VAT) from 20% to 22%, contrary to Putin's prior commitment not to increase taxes before 2030. State-controlled media were provided guidelines to frame the tax rise as a result of Western actions in the Ukraine war, advising them to avoid personal mentions of Putin and focus on positive aspects of other tax measures in the budget.
- Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has intensified his security measures amid concerns of potential US military action, tailoring recent public appearances to rally support under heightened scrutiny. His events are now announced last minute and feature selected crowds, as opposed to his previous appearances alongside high-ranking officials, which have diminished due to risks of targeting. Analysts note Maduro's approach reflects classic security protocols in response to perceived threats, ensuring he appears with large crowds to deter US aggression. The US has mobilized forces in the Caribbean, carrying out numerous strikes on vessels, which Maduro interprets as a move towards regime change. His security detail increasingly relies on Cuban personnel due to fears of disloyalty among Venezuelan guards amid economic turmoil.
-French lawmakers rejected a first draft of the 2026 budget, complicating Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu's efforts to achieve a deficit reduction from 5.4% to below 5% by year-end. This budget could determine Lecornu's political survival, given the fragmentation of parliament into three blocs without a majority. The bill, aimed at tax increases including on multinationals and wealthy individuals, was voted down by 404 lawmakers out of 577, even within Lecornu's centrist camp. Budget Minister Amélie de Montchalin criticized the proposed amendments as excessive but remains hopeful for future consensus in the National Assembly.
- Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has announced her resignation from Congress following a fallout with President Donald Trump, stating she cannot endure a "hurtful and hateful primary" against her. In a video posted to social media, Greene expressed her self-respect in making the decision and said her last day in office would be January 5, 2026. Her resignation follows Trump's withdrawal of support and his endorsement of a primary challenger. Greene criticized both Trump and fellow Republicans, claiming she worked hard to secure their electoral successes while establishment Republicans who opposed Trump have been welcomed back.
-Sales of Apple's iPhone Air, touted as a major redesign, have fallen short of expectations, prompting consumers to choose alternatives that offer better value and features. Launched in September, the iPhone Air's higher price and downsized camera and speaker quality to achieve its slim 5.64mm design have contributed to disappointing sales. IDC reports that Apple significantly reduced production plans shortly after launch, as sales reached only a third of initial forecasts. Despite iPhone sales being crucial, generating $209B in the past year, growth has stagnated, leading Apple to seek strategies to enhance sales.
-The planned cruise of Chinese passengers aboard the Adora Mediterranea to Japan's Miyako Island was thwarted by escalating tensions between China and Japan, ignited by comments from Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan. Passengers expressed disappointment, emphasizing national pride. The diplomatic crisis, deemed one of the worst in years, risks broader implications, including trade disruptions and increased travel warnings, as investors react to potential economic fallout. Meanwhile, the US ambassador has voiced support for Japan, highlighting the complexities of international commitments amidst this growing conflict.
-A US bankruptcy court has ordered Byju's founder, Byju Raveendran, to pay over $1B in a legal battle with creditors. The ruling follows a lawsuit regarding the misappropriation of proceeds from a $1.2B US term loan from 2021. The Delaware court found Raveendran in contempt for failing to cooperate with legal proceedings, with daily penalties accumulating to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Judge Brendan Shannon described the $1.07B relief as "extraordinary" and noted the unique circumstances of the case. Creditors earlier accused Raveendran and others of "masterminding the theft" of $533M in loan proceeds.
NEW YORK TIMES
-In 2025, the US economy displays a stark divide, with the artificial intelligence (AI) sector thriving while other industries falter. In states like Nevada and North Dakota, A.I. data center construction counterbalances local economic downturns caused by weak tourism and low oil prices. Meanwhile, the Washington D.C. area faces federal job cuts and a historic government shutdown, though AI investments provide some relief. The economic boom from AI is evidenced by substantial investments in technology, driving growth in gross domestic product.
-The standard Medicare Part B premium for 2026 is set to increase to $202.90/month, representing a 9.7% rise and marking the first instance it exceeds $200. This figure is 66% higher than it was a decade ago. Additionally, the annual Part B deductible will increase to $283, reflecting a 70.5% rise over the past 10 years. The premium increase will significantly impact the Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), consuming a large portion of the 2.8% increase in benefits. Consequently, retirees may find their effective COLA much lower than anticipated, with those receiving $2,008 monthly seeing a reduction to 1.9%, and lower-income beneficiaries receiving only 1%. Experts are highlighting the financial strain this places on seniors.
-Eli Lilly has achieved a milestone of $1T in market value, becoming the first publicly traded health care company to do so. This surge is largely due to the success of its GLP-1 weight loss medications, including Zepbound and Mounjaro, which are projected to be the world's top-selling drug this year. Under CEO Dave Ricks, who has led since 2017, Lilly has gained over $900B in market value. This achievement places Lilly alongside only a few technology companies that have reached the trillion-dollar mark, such as Nvidia.
-NYC Mayor Mamdani and President Trump, previously adversarial, have shown a surprising camaraderie after Mamdani's recent electoral victory. Despite Trump's prior accusations labeling Mamdani a “communist” and suggesting his illegal residency, Trump expressed respect for Mamdani as a political underdog, acknowledging his rise from obscurity. Trump noted the public interest in the narrative, contrasting it with his meetings with foreign leaders, which received less media attention. Mamdani skillfully referenced Trump’s voter support in New York to engage with the president and facilitate a constructive dialogue.
- Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia announced her resignation from Congress, effective January, following President Trump's condemnation of her as a "traitor" for her actions regarding the Justice Department's release of Jeffrey Epstein's files. Greene, who has had recent conflicts with Trump despite her previous staunch support, emphasized the need for loyalty and accountability to constituents in her announcement video, suggesting that her disconnection from "MAGA Inc" reflects a broader neglect of ordinary Americans.
-Recent environmental deregulations proposed by the Trump administration threaten U.S. ecosystems and species. The EPA aims to limit Clean Water Act protections affecting millions of acres of wetlands. Proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act may make it harder to safeguard endangered species, weighing economic impacts in decisions on species protection. Moreover, the Interior Department is pushing for extensive new oil and gas drilling across 1.3 billion acres of U.S. coastal waters. These proposals could irreparably harm water quality and biodiversity if enacted, and come amidst a significant global climate summit from which the U.S. abstained. Environmental advocates argue that the administration's fast-paced rollbacks will lead to severe ecological damage.
- After fluctuating in strategy, President Trump seems to have adopted a long-term pressure approach on Russia regarding the Ukraine war. He implemented new oil sanctions, albeit weaker than desired, and approved arms sales to Ukraine from European sources, boosting U.S. defense contractors. However, he hesitated on offering Tomahawk missiles, fearing escalation with Russia. His proposed peace plan largely aligns with Putin's demands, suggesting Ukraine cedes territory in Donetsk and Luhansk to Russia, recognizes this as Russian land, restricts NATO forces in Ukraine, and limits the Ukrainian military to 600,000 troops while prohibiting long-range weapons.
-President Trump criticized Nigeria for its inability to protect Christians, labeling the violence there as "genocide" for the first time. He expressed outrage on Fox News, asserting that thousands are being killed and threatened military action against the nation. The Nigerian national security adviser met with US Defense Secretary to address these allegations. Although over 8,000 people were reported killed in Nigeria this year, evidence does not suggest a higher attack rate on Christians compared to Muslims. Various forms of violence are prevalent, including terrorism, kidnappings, and land disputes, often with impunity for perpetrators. Trump's designation of Nigeria as a "Country of Particular Concern" highlights its severe religious freedom violations and potential military intervention from the US has been discussed.
NEW YORK POST
-President Trump's tariffs, aimed at bolstering U.S. manufacturing, may be backfiring, causing considerable anxiety among manufacturers. Despite an overall positive jobs report, the manufacturing sector had a significant decline, shedding nearly 100,000 jobs over the past year, leading to a decrease in blue-collar employment. The tariffs intend to raise the price of imports to encourage purchases of American-made products and resurrect domestic manufacturing. However, this view is overly simplistic, as the share of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. has fallen from around 27% in the 1960s to just above 8% now, a trend largely attributed to consumers' increasing preference for services. This decline is mirrored in other advanced economies, suggesting that attempts to resurrect past manufacturing levels through tariffs are futile, similar to the myth of King Canute asking the waves to recede. Furthermore, the tariffs increase the cost of imported materials, negatively impacting US manufacturing operations.
-Nancy Pelosi's potential retirement marks a significant shift for Autopilot, the investment tracking app that has gained prominence by following her trading activities. With $1B in assets under management and three million downloads, Autopilot recently secured $8M in funding to expand its operations from San Francisco to New York City. Chris Josephs, the founder of Autopilot, emphasizes the app's mission to promote transparency by showcasing top investors. He acknowledges Pelosi’s exit as a pivotal moment for the political stock trading landscape but has no immediate plans to rename the popular @pelositracker social media account, viewing it as a tribute to her influence. Autopilot is also focused on enhancing its team by hiring experienced engineers and traders, including a notable recruit from Citadel.

The information : Maybe Google Does Win It All

Maybe Google Does Win It All

A horrifying thought has lately been immovable from my mind: Am I gonna have to dump ChatGPT for Gemini?

Well, Gemini 3 is out, and it’s pretty darn slick: Google has improved the chatbot’s ability to code, search and create images, among other features. AI researcher Ethan Mollick is a fan, and so is Stratechery’s Ben Thompson. Our Stephanie Palazzolo deemed it “well worth the wait and the hype.”

What a difference a year or so makes. As recently as spring 2024, Gemini looked like a disaster, attracting widespread jeers for an aesthetic sensibility that wouldn’t have been out of place in a Wesleyan art class. Around that same time, OpenAI seemed to take great pleasure in tweaking Google’s tail, releasing competing products at almost exactly the same moment, many of which got plenty of applause. So people like me threw our lot in with OpenAI and befriended Chat, a buddy I’ve taught to understand my tastes as much as possible—from my morning coffee ritual (a Moka, though sadly not this Moka) to my preferred travel (like this delightful Slovenian hiking-biking expedition).

Having already invested some time and effort in personalizing the chatbot, I’m reluctant to use another, especially if everything I’ve told it becomes a part of a gee-whiz AI device. This speaks to a truism in tech that’s familiar to anyone who’s worked on, say, consumer apps: It’s hard to simply get people to download an app and build the habits that lead to steady use, and convincing someone to switch to a different app is tough, too. Just consider how Twitter has survived more assassination attempts than a third-world dictator.

For now, ChatGPT has many more users than Gemini: 800 million weekly users, while Gemini reports just 650 million monthly users, a wide gulf that reflects OpenAI’s first-mover advantage. OpenAI will hang on to many of them—many of us—simply by that law of inertia I just mentioned.

But there’s no getting around it: OpenAI seems to have fallen behind. We didn’t see it gleefully yanking on Google’s rear this past week, and the recent decision to reach for engagement bait like adult content suggests it has concerns about continued growth—at least in the short term. And while Fidji Simo, the company’s CEO of apps, appears eager to publicly insist the startup’s world domination can continue apace, CEO Sam Altman acknowledged behind closed doors last month that Google’s recent resurgence in AI would mean “rough” vibes for the time being, according to a scoop from our Stephanie and Erin Woo.

Plus, it’s not like OpenAI has been picking up cool points, which might mitigate an innovation slowdown.

Take Sora, for example—the startup’s last big thing. While the video app’s debut made for an undeniable moment, it has also made OpenAI into the de facto enemy of Hollywood and the creative class. Minus 100 cool points!

Relatedly, go talk to someone outside the coastal bubbles—another horrifying thought, I know—and I expect you’ll find that ChatGPT is increasingly the stand-in for AI as an evil, labor-market menace in people’s minds. Simply, ChatGPT is the most resonant brand in AI—and in this case, I guess that counts as a first-mover disadvantage. I used to think Gemini’s lack of powerful branding would really hurt it, but if sentiment around AI does really shift at some point, Google could be in a much better position. Maybe the name “Gemini” dissolves—wouldn’t be much of a loss brandingwise, would it?—and all that high-quality underlying technology gets quietly folded into Chrome and Google Search.

That scenario reminds me of that scene from “Mad Men”—coming to HBOMax in 4K in two weeks!—when Don Draper’s Sterling Cooper colleagues try to talk him into joining them in a pitch for American Airlines, which has just suffered a crash.

“We already have an airline,” Don says.

“We don’t have American,” says his boss, Roger Sterling. “Well, that’s right,” Don replies. “We have the one whose planes didn’t just fall out of the sky.”

Or, in the context of Google’s public image, the company would have the technology that didn’t just vaporize millions of jobs. Just boring ol’ Google Search.

The information : Zach Dell Thinks He Can Solve America’s Energy Crisis

Zach Dell Thinks He Can Solve America’s Energy Crisis
With $1 billion in new funding, Zach Dell, son of billionaire Michael Dell, envisions his startup turning millions of homes into one giant battery.

To get inside why Zach Dell believes he will shake up the half-trillion-dollar U.S. power industry and then go global, it helps to take account of who’s inspiring the moves.

That would be his father, Michael Dell, who sold computer parts out of his college dorm at 19, took Dell Computer public four years later and by age 26 had entirely disrupted the personal computer business and become one of the richest people in the world.

At 29, the younger Dell is still working out the kinks at Base Power, the Austin, Texas, battery startup he co-founded two years ago. That, he concedes, puts him just slightly behind the pace his father set four decades ago. “I got off to a late start,” Dell jokes. Still, investors have been throwing money at him, most recently a $1 billion round in October, which valued Base at $4 billion, almost five times its valuation six months earlier. Base plans to spend some of the money on building two battery-making factories in Austin.

Dell’s idea resembles his father’s effort to bring personal computers to the masses. He is leasing no-frills home backup batteries—large gray boxes that sit outside—for a cut-rate $19 a month plus a few hundred dollars in installation fees. That’s a huge discount to the approximately $15,000 it costs to install a Tesla Powerwall.

The batteries provide homeowners with a source of cheap power for keeping their lights on if a blackout or a natural disaster hits. They’re Wi-Fi enabled and grid connected, so Base recharges them from the grid when its software calculates energy costs are low. In other moments, Base routes energy stored in the batteries to the grid to meet elevated demand—selling that energy at a higher price. The deal doesn’t include solar.

Roughly 18 months ago, it took Dell’s service crew a couple of days to install the first Base home battery. “But then we were just like, ‘OK, how do we make the next step? How do we go from 10, to 20, to 30, to 40 a day?’ Just go, go, go,” Dell said. The crews are now up to 50 installations on good days and have the batteries in more than 7,000 Texas homes. At a scale of millions of homes, Base batteries would be capable of operating like a gigantic power plant.

Base arrives at a time when America is deeply worried about energy. AI data centers threaten to put enormous strain on the country’s existing infrastructure, which was already struggling before their mass proliferation.

Dell notes that utilities are scrambling to get capacity on the grid to meet this booming demand, and he thinks Base will disrupt incumbent energy incumbents like NRG Energy by adding capacity faster than they can: His batteries are, after all, far easier to get running than setting up a nuclear power plant. “We are a technology-led company in an industry without technology-led companies” he said. After conquering the U.S., he plans to expand to Australia, Germany, Spain, the U.K. and other countries.

Dell, with his talk of world expansion and market dominance, fits a certain mold: He’s one of the scions of 1980s and 1990s billionaires who have suddenly surfaced with big plans to shake up industries like biotech, renewable energy and media. There’s David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, whose Skydance Media has acquired Paramount Global and is making a run at Warner Bros. Discovery. Meanwhile, Reed Jobs, Steve Jobs’ eldest son and the head of venture firm Yosemite, is seeking to eradicate cancer.

Of course, Dell’s plans come with some big risks: It’s no sure thing that homeowners everywhere will be as eager as power-starved Texans to pay for a battery—or that AI companies will actually build all the data centers in their most ambitious forecasts.

Base will retain ownership of its batteries, meaning it is also assuming enormous expense—which may explain why others have avoided following in Dell’s footsteps. He will have to keep going back to investors and either giving up more equity or taking debt on the company’s balance sheet, until some unknown future date when Base’s cash flow can cover its growth.

“How do you sustain this?” said industry veteran Vikash Venkataramana, the San Francisco–based chief product officer for India’s Amara Raja Power Systems. “You have to keep raising large sums of capital if you want to grow.”

Dell, as it happens, might be just the person in the unique position to do so. “Zach has the ability to raise huge sums of money because of who he is,” Venkataramana said. “I don’t think any entrepreneur trying to do this would be able to bring in this much capital.”

Dell concedes that he has basically been tutored since boyhood on exactly this sort of capture-an-industry play. “I got to see front row how this is done,” he said. “And I feel very blessed to have had that perspective.”

Watching his father do that in computers, Dell obsessed over building his own “great company,” and not just any great company. “I’d been looking for paradigm shifts,” he said of his early 20s. “I was looking for a wave to surf.”

The main vibe you get from Dell is a sense of imperviousness. At 17, for instance, he raised $585,000 from investors including his father’s pal Marc Benioff to bankroll a dating app called Thread. It failed to take off, but Dell shrugged off the experience as no big deal. Growing up as he had, “I was kind of unafraid,” he told me.

In 2020, soon after graduating from the University of Southern California with a social sciences degree, Dell went to work as a private equity analyst at Blackstone. That gave him more confidence, he said, especially about taking “big swings” at deals involving “big numbers on a spreadsheet.”

“You’re the analyst on these big, billion-dollar transactions, and the partners are relying on your math and your analysis,” he said.

In 2021, Dell went to work for Thrive Capital, the venture firm founded by Josh Kushner. He was part of an eight-member team that invested in SpaceX and Anduril Industries, both formative experiences. Dell looked up to the billionaire founders of those two companies—Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey—as role models. They went after big traditional industries—Musk with space, Luckey with weapons—and won.

Now, when Dell looked at big power companies in the U.S. and elsewhere in the West, he thought he saw the same sort of target. Based on cost trends, he thought stationary storage batteries and solar would come to supplant coal as the cheapest way to power the grid—and that could be really big. Yet the leaders of battery and solar companies were moving slowly, if at all.

“These are not engineers, and they’re not engineering-led companies: They are finance-led companies,” he said. “They don’t look like SpaceX; they don’t look like Anduril; they don’t look like Tesla. And energy is a deeply technical part of the economy where technology is really needed.”

Dell made a decision: “I wanted to do to energy what SpaceX did to aerospace and Anduril did to defense.”

While Thrive was conducting its due diligence on Anduril, Dell met Justin Lopas, Anduril’s head of manufacturing and a former SpaceX engineer. In 2023, the two, along with a slew of Tesla, SpaceX and Anduril veterans, co-founded Base. In regular tweets, Michael Dell, who did not respond to a request for comment, has cheered from the sidelines.

“There’s a guy named Dell building a great company in Austin,” he wrote on X last month.

Dell’s push into batteries aligns with the U.S. data center boom. According to BloombergNEF, a renewable energy research firm, hyperscalers will need 362 gigawatts of additional power worldwide by 2035 to sustain the growing data center fleet. Almost half of those will be required in the U.S., according to the Brattle Group. One gigawatt is equivalent to the power usage of up to 750,000 homes. So if the announced projects materialize, the data centers would use the power equivalent of about 270 million homes, or twice the number of U.S. households.

No one knows where the AI industry will get all that power, which makes electricity the biggest bottleneck in expanding data center capacity. Dell thinks his batteries would be a relatively fast—and generally overlooked—way to add gigawatts of capacity to the grid: If a fraction of U.S. households installed a 25 kilowatt-hour battery, the minimum size Base installs, they would provide for much of hyperscalers’ peak needs.

That’s a very simplistic picture, though. The reality is more complicated. Battery-equipped houses would have to be located where hyperscalers need them. And Dell has to make sure that in trading away the power in homeowners’ batteries, he doesn’t leave them high and dry during a blackout, triggering a massive and company-killing customer revolt.

Base will need to keep raising cash—billions of dollars—to buy all those battery cells and the power devices and other parts needed to assemble them into packs for the global buildout Dell outlines. Doing a back-of-the-envelope calculation, the $1 billion he raised last month will perhaps cover a couple hundred thousand home batteries and the initial capacity of the factory he is planning near the Austin airport. There is no guarantee that investors will keep their wallets open, even for someone named Dell.

But Dell seems unworried as usual. He talks like the rest will be there when it needs it. His cash in hand is “a good amount,” he said. “We’ll go, you know, execute and reevaluate.”

CrunchBase : The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: A Lot Of Really Big Deals

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: A Lot Of Really Big Deals

Perhaps venture investors wanted to get their term sheets squared away in advance of the holiday season. Or maybe AI, despite all the bubble talk, is still heating up in a big way in the startup sphere. Whatever the reason, this past week was an exceptionally busy one for very large startup financings.

Not surprisingly, an AI company led the rankings. Lambda, a provider of AI cloud infrastructure, closed on $1.5 billion in Series E funding. Next up was predictions market Kalshi, which picked up $1 billion. More AI, plus crypto, fintech and biotech rounded out the list.

1. Lambda, $1.5B, AI cloud infrastructure: San Francisco-based Lambda, a provider of AI cloud infrastructure, says it raised over $1.5 billion in Series E funding led by TWG Global, a holding company led by Thomas Tull and Mark Walter. Founded in 2012, Lambda has raised $3.2 billion in equity and debt funding to date, per Crunchbase data.

2. Kalshi, $1B, predictions market: Kalshi, a marketplace for wagering predictions on future events, reportedly picked up $1 billion in a new round led by Sequoia Capital and CapitalG. The financing is said to set an $11 billion valuation for the 7-year-old, New York-based company.

3. Luma AI, $900M, multimedia AI: Silicon Valley-based Luma AI, a startup focused on AI-generated video and imagery, announced that it secured $900 million in a Series C round led by Humain that included significant participation from AMD.

4. Kraken, $800M, cryptocurrency: Cryptocurrency exchange Kraken closed on $800 million in new investment across two tranches. Investors including Jane Street Capital, DRW Venture Capital, HSG, Oppenheimer and Tribe Capital led the primary tranche. Citadel Securities also made a $200 million strategic investment at a $20 billion valuation, per Kraken.

5. Physical Intelligence, $600M, robotics AI: San Francisco-based Physical Intelligence, a developer of AI software to power robots, raised $600 million in a funding round led by CapitalG that reportedly sets a $5.6 valuation for the company. Other investors in the round include Lux Capital, Thrive Capital, Jeff Bezos, Index Ventures and T. Rowe Price.

6. Ramp, $300M, fintech: Expense management provider Ramp landed $300 million in fresh funding led by Lightspeed Venture Partners at a $32 billion valuation. The financing marks the fourth raise for New York-based Ramp in 2025 alone, and brings its total equity raised since its 2019 inception to $2.3 billion, per the company.

7. Function Health, $298M, longevity: Austin-based Function Health, a startup offering lab tests, scans and health data with an eye to extending lifespans, secured $298 million in Series B financing. Redpoint led the round, which set a $2.5 billion valuation for the 3-year-old company.

8. Genspark, $275M, agentic AI: Palo Alto, California-based Genspark, a platform for building agentic AI tools for knowledge workers, announced that it closed on $275 million in a Series B round at a $1.25 billion valuation. The company also said it exceeded $50 million in annualized revenue run rate within five months.

9. Suno, $250M, AI music creation: Suno, an AI platform for producing songs and music, raised $250 million in a Series C financing at a $2.45 billion valuation. Menlo Ventures led the financing for the 3-year-old, Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company.

10. Solve Therapeutics, $120M, biotech: San Diego-based Solve Therapeutics, a developer of therapeutics and diagnostics for treating solid tumor malignancies, raised $120 million in a round led by cancer-focused venture investor Yosemite.

WSJ : Bill Ackman Eyes Simultaneous Public Offerings of Firm and New Fund

Bill Ackman Eyes Simultaneous Public Offerings of Firm and New Fund
Billionaire investor wants to take his hedge-fund management company, Pershing Square, public at the same time as a new closed-end fund next year

  • Bill Ackman is eyeing a dual public offering of his hedge-fund firm, Pershing Square, and a new investment fund, Pershing Square USA, early next year.
  • Investors in Pershing Square USA would receive shares in the management company, Pershing Square, as an incentive.
  • Pershing Square manages approximately $20 billion and its main fund is up 17% this year through Nov. 18.

Bill Ackman is looking to take public his hedge-fund firm, Pershing Square, and a new investment fund simultaneously, according to people familiar with the matter.

He hopes to stage the unique double public offering early next year, the people said.

The Wall Street Journal reported last spring that Ackman was considering an IPO of his investment firm and was raising money from investors as a precursor to an IPO.

Meanwhile, Pershing Square had also filed a prospectus early last year for a new closed-end fund, Pershing Square USA, Ltd., which would be marketed to U.S. individual investors and traded on the New York Stock Exchange. He paused fundraising efforts for that fund in July 2024.

Ackman, long a fan of creative financial maneuvers, is now pursuing what would amount to simultaneous offerings of both, the people said.

Investors who invest in the closed-end fund would receive shares in the management company, Pershing Square, for free, some of the people said. Partners of Pershing Square would give away up to 10% of shares in the firm, which could be valued well over the $10.5 billion valuation it fetched in 2024.

It is always possible the plans will fall apart or that Ackman could change course again. The Financial Times reported earlier Friday that Ackman was preparing a listing of his hedge fund business, without mentioning his other plans.

One of the challenges Ackman acknowledges is the need to generate enthusiasm for Pershing Square USA’s closed-end structure, which has fallen out of favor with investors. Similar funds—including one Ackman listed a decade ago in Europe—trade at a discount to the net value of their holdings.

That is part of the reason he attached shares in the management company as an incentive.

A closed-end fund sells a fixed number of shares in a public offering. Investors can exit only by selling shares to other investors at their price on the open market, regardless of the value of the fund’s investments.

Ackman’s profile has risen beyond Wall Street since he became an outspoken social crusader and aligned himself with figures including President Trump and Elon Musk. That could make his closed-end fund attractive to the general investing public.

Pershing Square manages roughly $20 billion. Once known for activism, it since has transitioned its strategy to focus on concentrated stakes in big public companies. His main fund is up 17% this year through Nov. 18.

Ackman himself has a history of pushing the envelope with novel investment ideas and endeavors, not all of which go according to plan. In 2020, he raised $4 billion in what was the largest-ever IPO for a special-purpose acquisition company but failed to consummate his chosen transaction.

Then in 2023 he got regulators’ blessing for a new investment vehicle, a special-purpose acquisition rights company—a spin on a SPAC he said was more shareholder-friendly. It has yet to announce a deal.

More recently, the firm bought nearly half of the real-estate firm Howard Hughes, which Ackman has envisioned as a modern-day Berkshire Hathaway, referencing the company of his longtime idol, Warren Buffett.