CrunchBase : The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Defense Tech Leads With Multi

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Defense Tech Leads With Multiple Large Deals, Topped By $600M For Space Security Startup True Anomaly

Large U.S. venture deals this week were led by a massive defense tech raise for space security startup True Anomaly. That theme continued with another two aerospace- and defense-related companies also getting major investor backing. We also saw sizable deals for startups applying AI to fintech, marketing, customer service, healthcare and developer tools. Let’s take a closer look.

1. True Anomaly, $600M, aerospace and defense: Centennial, Colorado-based True Anomaly raised a massive $600 million Series D led by Eclipse and Riot Ventures, with participation from a long list of other backers including Accel, 645 Ventures, G Squared, Acme Capital, Menlo Ventures and Paradigm. True Anomaly develops space security and in-orbit defense systems, an area drawing increasing venture investor attention amid rising geopolitical tensions. The new round brings its total funding up to $1.1 billion, per Crunchbase.

2. Rogo, $160M, AI and fintech: New York-based Rogo secured $160 million in Series D funding led by Kleiner Perkins and joined by other investors including Thrive Capital, Sequoia Capital, Khosla Ventures, BoxGroup, J.P. Morgan Growth Equity Partners and Jack Altman. Rogo builds AI-powered tools to automate financial research and workflows. The latest financing brings its total funding raised to date to $314 million, per Crunchbase. The deal is also the latest example of investor enthusiasm for startups targeting high-value knowledge work such as law and accounting.

3. Hightouch, $150M, AI and marketing: San Francisco-based Hightouch raised $150 million in a Series D co-led by Bain Capital Ventures and Goldman Sachs Alternatives. Iconiq Capital, Amplify Partners, Sapphire Ventures, Y Combinator and other investors joined. The company focuses on agentic AI-driven marketing and customer data activation. The round brings Hightouch’s total funding to date to more than $332 million and comes amid rising demand for AI tools embedded directly into enterprise marketing stacks.

4. Avoca, $125M, AI and customer service: New York-based Avoca brought in $125 million in a Series B led by General Catalyst and Meritech Capital Partners, with participation from other investors including Kleiner Perkins, BoxGroup, Alt Capital and Amplify Partners. Avoca develops AI agents for customer communication workflows. The new raise brings its total funding to $125.5 million, per Crunchbase.

5. Netomi, $110M, AI and customer service: San Mateo, California-based Netomi raised $110 million in a Series C led by Accenture Ventures, with participation from Adobe Ventures and others, including individual investors Justin Wexler, Henry Kravis, Greg Brockman, Nikesh Arora and Mustafa Suleyman. The company offers AI-powered customer experience automation across channels. The new funding brings its total raised to date to $217 million, per Crunchbase.

6. (tied) Parallel, $100M, developer tools: Palo Alto, California-based Parallel secured $100 million in a Series B led by Sequoia Capital, with additional backing from other big-name investors Index Ventures, Khosla Ventures and Kleiner Perkins. The startup is building a suite of AI agents and developer tools to automate workflows. It has raised $260 million to date, per Crunchbase.

6. (tied) Scout AI, $100M, aerospace and defense: Sunnyvale, California-based Scout AI raised a sizable $100 million Series A led by Align Ventures and Draper Associates. A long list of other investors joined, including Booz Allen Ventures, Vaughn Capital Partners and FJ Labs. The startup develops AI systems for aerospace and defense applications. Its large early-stage round underscores continued investor appetite for dual-use and defense-focused startups, which globally raised a record $7.7 billion in 2025, per Crunchbase data.

8. Firestorm, $82M, aerospace and defense: San Diego-based Firestorm closed an $82 million Series B led by Washington Harbour Partners. Booz Allen Ventures also participated in this round, as did IQT, Lockheed Martin, New Enterprise Associates, Motley Fool Ventures and others. Firestone builds modular, mission-adaptable drone systems. It has raised nearly $150 million total, per Crunchbase.

9. Iterative Health, $77M, health diagnostics: Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Iterative Health raised $77 million in a Series C led by Google Ventures and Intrepid Growth Partners, with additional backing from Obvious Ventures, Insight Partners and EDBI. The company develops AI-powered diagnostic and clinical workflow tools, particularly in gastroenterology. It has raised more than $268 million since inception, according to Crunchbase.

10. Standard Intelligence, $75M, foundational AI: Investors continue to back next-generation foundation model startups. One of the latest is San Francisco-based AI research startup Standard Intelligence, which raised a $75 million Series A led by Spark Capital and Sequoia Capital. The raise comes at a $425 million pre-money valuation. Other investors in the deal include Stanley Druckenmiller, Milan Kovac and AI researcher Andrej Karpathy. Standard AI is developing “computer-use” models designed to interact directly with software. Its approach — training on large-scale video data rather than manually annotated screenshots — aims to significantly reduce costs and improve performance.

The Information : Secretive ZaiNar Exits Shadows, Targets $5 Billion in Deals fo

Secretive ZaiNar Exits Shadows, Targets $5 Billion in Deals for GPS Alternative
ZaiNar says it has developed innovative, ultraprecise tracking tech that will teach robots to see and help power the physical AI era. It will also freak out everyone who worries about digital privacy.

A couple of weeks ago, Daniel Jacker, CEO and co-founder of ZaiNar, made me an alluring offer: Would I like to see the first-ever public demonstration of the technology his startup had spent nine years laboriously developing in anonymity? He described it as the most accurate location-tracking tech on the planet, capable of pinpointing an object’s whereabouts within inches—indoors and outdoors—from a great distance away. Sure, Google Maps and Apple’s Find My feature are pretty terrific, but even in the best cases, they typically can only determine someone’s location to within dozens of feet and sometimes can’t find a device’s location at all if it’s inside or underground.

I knew Jacker had lined up a cadre of major investors, including Steve Jurvetson and Yahoo’s Jerry Yang, and had revealed the startup’s existence in February by announcing they’d valued the company at $1 billion.

I couldn’t possibly turn him down.

So Jacker, 37, and I met at a 20,000-square-foot warehouse in Belmont, Calif., previously occupied by GoPro. When we entered a ground-floor room divided by thick walls and cluttered with metal racks, Jacker handed a smartphone to one of his engineers, whom he’d enlisted to help with the demo. The device was connected to a 5G network through four antennas installed on the walls. It should’ve been very difficult to pinpoint its exact location without adding specialized equipment to the device or the room; plus, the warehouse’s interior metal roof would’ve made traditional GPS tracking challenging. But on a laptop monitor, ZaiNar software showed it as a tiny blue dot on a map of the warehouse floor.

As the engineer began to walk around with it, I kept waiting for the blue dot to disappear—or perhaps lag behind his movements. It never did, not even when he slipped into a narrow hallway between two anechoic chambers—rooms that use special tiles and foam to block out sound, satellite connections and wireless internet.

Jacker said his technology can track any phone, car, drone or robot in almost any environment as long as it’s roughly within a mile of a 5G base station, antenna or other network receiver. The one exception: He and his four co-founders haven’t yet figured out how to make it work underwater. He framed his company’s technology in cinematic terms: “We know where everything, everywhere, all at once is.”

Jacker sees the startup’s tech as an alternative to GPS-based tracking. Every device that can connect to wireless internet, like Wi-Fi and 5G, sends out radio signals to stay on the network. Zainar’s software uses those signals to track a device’s location within 4 inches, according to Jacker. The software works indoors using private Wi-Fi and 5G and outdoors using 5G networks operated by mobile carriers.

The concept of using radio signals for more precise location tracking has been kicking around university labs and Menlo Park skunkworks for years, but no other startup has come up with software that can actually analyze and correctly, precisely interpret the signals without requiring expensive, cumbersome hardware on a device or in the surrounding environment, Jacker said. The startup has benefited by closely studying the subtle variations of radio waves, giving it a better understanding of how long it takes for a signal to travel from a device to the network. That sense of timing is then used to help assess a device’s location.

ZaiNar’s technology uses a specific signal transmitted through radio waves called a sounding reference signal, long part of wireless technology. A device can send out this signal as much as 500 times a second, and since it transmits so frequently, it’s useful for tracking a moving device, like a drone or a robot. Apple recently added a feature that allows users to limit the precision of location data shared with cellular carriers. However, device makers like Apple and Google cannot prevent their devices from emitting the radio signals ZaiNar is analyzing, Jacker said, which means its technology could constantly monitor them anytime they’re connected to a network.

The startup already has $500 million in signed contracts and nonbinding commitments, according to Jacker, and is currently negotiating another $5 billion in deals. ZaiNar has two sets of customers: First, it sells software to mobile carriers, who use it to sell location-based data. The city of Tokyo, for instance, is studying traffic patterns and congestion by buying data that multiple mobile carriers gleaned using ZaiNar’s technology. How do they obtain the data? Both the cars on the roads and the smartphones pedestrians carry emit the signals ZaiNar’s software relies on. (Jacker wouldn’t say which mobile carriers are currently working with his startup.)

Second, Zainar also sells its software to private companies that want to monitor 5G-connected hardware like phones, drones and certain construction equipment. And its investors are betting the startup will win a pile of business from all the companies currently rushing to manufacture robots, as well as the customers who want to put those robots to use.

For the robotics boom to fully take off, robots need to have an acute sense of their whereabouts. But right now, most robots are pretty dumb when it comes to moving around. ZaiNar’s technology could improve how they see and move, said Ajay Ramachandran, an investor in ZaiNar through his San Francisco–based firm, ifMagic Ventures. “From robots to various kinds of drones to Waymos, they’re all going to benefit from this very precise location signal,” he said.

The startup has already struck deals with AI companies building world models, which simulate real-world environments to train autonomous systems like robots and self-driving cars before they’re let loose in the physical world. Those AI businesses see the location data ZaiNar has accumulated through its mobile carrier partnerships as valuable in training their models. In the past two weeks alone, ZaiNar signed more than $30 million in contracts to supply such data to companies developing world models, Jacker said.

“If you believe that physical AI is going to be a $50 trillion or $100 trillion [opportunity],” said Ramachandran, “this becomes a major opportunity from ZaiNar’s vantage point.”

But not everyone is so enthusiastic. Gus Hosein, executive director of Privacy International, a London-based watchdog focused on digital surveillance and data abuses, argued that ZaiNar’s technology is ripe for misuse. “Tech like this moves surveillance decisions to the network,” he said, adding that network providers like cell carriers have a bad track record with user privacy.

“Governments and ad tech firms alike relish that opportunity for exploitation,” he said. “People do not.”

ZaiNar’s story began as many Silicon Valley tales do: with a chance meeting on the palm tree–lined campus of Stanford University. Jacker, a Chicago-area native, arrived there in 2016 for an MBA after trying to build a 3D-printing startup and spending time as an Accenture consultant.

During Jacker’s first semester, he met Philip Kratz, an applied physics doctoral student who ran Stanford’s student radio engineering club. The pair were both in Design Garage, a popular design school class that drew people from many different disciplines. They began talking about Kratz’s theory that advancements in radio technology offered a new way to analyze radio signals and accurately determine the precise location of devices like phones and cars. Together, they hatched a plan: Kratz would handle the science behind the technology; Jacker would work on commercializing it.

In an initial test of the idea, they placed a 4G antenna on a concrete wall bordering Campus Drive, the road that loops through campus. As each car drove by, they found they could detect it through the wall using the radio signal emitted by the car’s tire pressure sensor. It was an early validation of their theory. In another test, they tried to locate devices using wireless signals in the Stanford Business School garage and found their technique worked in that environment as well.

These experiments soon caught the attention of two of Jacker’s MBA classmates, Jack Levy and Eric Roselli, who joined up with him and Kratz. (Today Kratz is ZaiNar’s chief technology officer, and Levy is chief operating officer. Roselli is head of defense—exploring how the technology could be used for national security and potentially in war.) Next, Jacker recruited Alexander Hooshmand as a fifth co-founder. A Stanford guest lecturer, Hooshmand had recently sold data company BlueKai, which he co-founded, to Oracle for $400 million. Jacker made the overture amid a crowd of people who had stayed to speak to Hooshman after a class.

“There was a line of people waiting, but Danny was the only one I followed up with,” Hooshmand recalled. “It immediately occurred to me that if what they were describing worked, it would be incredibly powerful.”

The idea was good, but the founders still had to actually make the technology work. Over the decades, there have been many attempts to crack the challenging problem of tracking the location of objects inside buildings where satellite signals struggle to penetrate, said Fadel Adib, an associate professor at the MIT Media Lab and a co-founder of Cartesian Systems, which has developed its own wireless tracking technology for retail stores to monitor inventory but isn’t a direct ZaiNar competitor.

Many of those efforts have failed for one key reason: Researchers in labs have claimed to have made breakthroughs, but “when you take them into the real world, something changes,” said Adib, blaming real-world obstacles that distort radio waves, like metal, doors and walls. Adib remains skeptical that ZaiNar’s technology can perform exactly as Jacker describes it—particularly when it comes to tracking things indoors—though he noted that he hasn’t tried the tech himself.

Jeff Depew, board president of Sand Hill Angels, a Bay Area–based firm that invested in ZaiNar in 2017, said other entrepreneurs interested in the technology lacked the patience to spend years perfecting it. Depew said he had previously mentored the founders of a similar startup also started by Stanford graduates, WiFiSlam. Even though they were in talks to do a big deal with Procter & Gamble, they still sold their business to Apple after just two years—for about $20 million.

Depew sees how the young founders, who wanted to cash out quickly, saw it as a “great outcome,” he said. “But they walked away from something that was really going to be transformational.”

ZaiNar, on the other hand, has taken a longer-term approach, he argued. “They were focused on doing it—from my perspective—the right way rather than the fast way.”

After ZaiNar’s founders graduated from Stanford, they quietly raised $5 million from investors including Yang, who became an early adviser, while deliberately trying to avoid any media attention. Jacker said none of the five founders had ever taken any money out of the business through secondary share sales. “We’re so bullish on what we’re doing,” he said.

After graduating, the ZaiNar founders worked out of Kratz’s three-bedroom home in Redwood City, Calif., and kept testing their technology in as many places as possible, including in Kratz’s living room and at a nearby indoor volleyball gym. To use the gym, they offered engineering classes to the high school students who played there. “Literally imagine us setting up different tripods and radios as there’s the high school volley teams trying to spike balls at us and knock things over,” Jacker said.

In 2019, ZaiNar ran its first test at a live construction site, the type of busy environment the founders hoped their tech would eventually get used in. In the years since, they’ve deployed their technology in a range of challenging locales, including a large California hospital system, a rail station in Japan and a million-square-foot fulfillment center in Michigan owned by a large online retailer, whose identity Jacker wouldn’t reveal.

ZaiNar was close to finally coming out of stealth mode in 2024 with a product focused just on tracking via Wi-Fi. But Jacker and his co-founders decided to wait a little longer and make a product that could also track via 5G. Moreover, they wanted to wait for enthusiasm about physical AI—robots, drones and autonomous vehicles—to intensify, figuring the companies making those products would be very eager to use its location-tracking technology.

“We wanted to create as big a moat as possible, so we could go in and really own the market,” Jacker said. “It was deliberate—but at times frustrating—not being able to tell the world what we were doing.”


Steve Jurvetson, a longtime VC fixture who has backed everything from SpaceX to Hotmail, is a ZaiNar investor and a major cheerleader for its technology, which he has described nothing less than “extraordinary.” (Getty Images)
Today Jacker and his co-founders hope their portfolio of 96 patents gives them a sturdy defense against any rivals. Still, they do have some giant competitors. In January, Ericsson, the massive Swedish telecom, unveiled a new 5G location-tracking technology, which the company says can track objects indoors within about 3 feet and outdoors within 4 inches. Huawei, Nokia and Qualcomm also all have their own offerings.

One way ZaiNar is bringing its technology to market is through a partnership with a large European consulting firm that helps large enterprises like infrastructure company Siemens and oil producer Saudi Aramco build private 5G networks. A senior data and AI executive at the firm, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so they could discuss the relationship with ZaiNar more freely, said it now offers ZaiNar’s location-tracking system as an add-on when deploying 5G infrastructure.

The executive described the relationship as a “win-win,” as the technology helps the consulting firm differentiate itself from competitors. They said its internal testing of ZaiNar’s technology in November produced strong results. The firm is now working on a pilot deployment at a site owned by an industrial conglomerate. If successful, the firm could expand the technology to hundreds of the conglomerate’s other sites.

At ZaiNar’s Belmont warehouse, I couldn’t help but feel a little disturbed as I watched the blue dot weave across that laptop screen. Sure, the technology was impressive, but the little dot represented a person. And we, as people, already exist in a world where our digital privacy has been steadily eroded for decades. ZaiNar’s technology could undermine it even further, leading to more intrusive forms of marketing, government surveillance and other possible abuses.

Since ZaiNar’s technology can granularly track a device’s movement using the signals a device broadcasts to stay online, it makes permissionless tracking very easy. (A user can’t turn off this type of location tracking the way they can other location services on a smartphone, though they could evade detection by putting their devices in airplane mode.) ZaiNar sees this as a major corporate selling point, and while I was reporting this story, a spokesperson for the startup described tracking items like phones and cars “without cooperation from those devices” as a large part of the company’s “key IP moat.”

When I pressed Jacker about the dystopian elements of his technology, he argued that the U.S. government already very tightly regulates the activities of mobile carriers, making them safer than some “random app” that isn’t watched as closely. He also emphasized that the location data is anonymized, though Hosein with Privacy International argued that one could identify it by, for example, cross-referencing it with CCTV footage.

And the telecoms don’t have squeaky-clean records when it comes to privacy. AT&T and Verizon, for instance, are still battling a more than $100 million combined fine dating back to a 2020 investigation by the Federal Communications Commission, which accused them of mishandling customer data in a previous effort to track and sell cellphone users’ locations to third parties.


One of the buzziest recent debuts in robotics came last year when 1X, a then little-known Palo Alto startup, said its Neo humanoid would be available in homes by 2026. (Getty Images)
Jacker said he has firm boundaries for his technology’s use. The company does not do deals in Russia and China and does not integrate with Chinese firms such as Huawei or ZTE, both of which the U.S. has identified as national security threats because of their connections to the Chinese military. But what about an organization like the U.S.’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement? Jacker said he wouldn’t ever allow the federal agency to, for instance, use ZaiNar’s tracking for immigration raids.

“That’s crossing a line for us,” said Jacker, saying it would be “too Holocausty” to consider. But he could see ICE using ZaiNar technology for other operations.

“But border security? Totally fine,” he said.

As ZaiNar’s technology more fully enters the public spotlight, Depew, the ZaiNar investor, predicts questions around privacy will become more front of mind for people in the U.S. Depew said he would ideally like there to be an opt-in feature for users (though because of how the location tracking works, this doesn’t seem possible). Depew, an iPhone owner, brought up Apple as an example.

“It knows where I am, but I also know that they’re keeping it within the walled garden and not sharing it with everybody and so advertisers aren’t able to come after me without my inviting them in,” he said, adding that ZaiNar’s technology “allows you to do that on steroids.”

Jacker casts the dilemma I pointed out to him as just an example of an age-old problem. The internet, for example, has been transformative, but it also enables harm. “On the web, do terrorists communicate? Of course. And can you build a bomb online? Yes.”

Any powerful technology has good and bad uses,” he continued. “The question is, can you do your best to protect it so it’s used in a way that is a net positive?”

WSJ : OpenAI Wants to Go Public. First Sarah Friar Needs to Get It to Grow Up.

OpenAI Wants to Go Public. First Sarah Friar Needs to Get It to Grow Up.
The chief financial officer is managing Sam Altman—and ambitions for one of the biggest IPOs ever. She has pulled off impossible ones before.

After a dizzying summer of deals, Sam Altman came to work one day last fall, ready to show just how confident he was in OpenAI’s future. In a livestream broadcast to the public from the startup’s unmarked San Francisco offices in October, he showed a black-and-white slide with a number he said represented OpenAI’s financial obligations for new computing capacity: $1.4 trillion.

The giant number spread like wildfire across the investment world—and not in a good way. OpenAI was set to generate $13 billion in revenue that year. So everyone was asking the same question: how on earth was the company going to pay for it?

For Sarah Friar, OpenAI’s chief financial officer, it was time to clear up the confusion. A veteran CFO who had spent more than a decade at Goldman Sachs, she had been brought into the startup to give it the financial maturity needed to go public.

In the ensuing months, she privately walked back his comments. The company actually planned to spend a much smaller amount, she told investors: $600 billion through 2030. More recently, she has questioned the wisdom of spending even more money on data centers, at times putting her at odds with her freewheeling boss.

Like any corporate CFO, Friar must translate her CEO’s grandest ambitions into something the company can actually afford—and know the right time to say no. She follows a line of women in Silicon Valley asked to tame the wilder impulses of companies—or their younger male founders. Google brought in Ruth Porat after going public to control costs and add discipline to what had become freewheeling spending on moonshots. Mark Zuckerberg got Sheryl Sandberg at Facebook, and Elon Musk has Gwynne Shotwell at SpaceX.

There was Friar herself at Square in 2012, where she became Jack Dorsey’s second-in-command, helping steer the payments startup through a turbulent public offering more than a decade ago. When she announced her departure in 2018, Square’s stock sank by over 10%—a sign of just how important investors came to see her role at the company.

It falls to Friar to pull off what is envisioned as one of the biggest IPOs ever—at the exact moment when OpenAI’s growth has slowed relative to rivals.

Executives from OpenAI have spoken with stock exchange officials about potential IPO plans, according to people familiar with the matter, but haven’t yet kicked off a formal process.

IPOs are always unpredictable, but even more so when the company is in a race to develop world-changing technology, where the winner changes week to week and investor sentiment shifts just as fast.

OpenAI recently missed multiple internal revenue and user targets after facing ferocious competition from its two biggest rivals, Google and Anthropic. The losing streak has rattled executives and employees, some of whom have peppered all-hands meetings with anxious questions about the company’s future.

In recent months, Friar has grown more cautious about OpenAI’s data-center spending, telling company leaders she was worried the company wouldn’t be able to pay for computing deals if revenue didn’t grow fast enough, The Wall Street Journal has reported. She has also told them it might need more time to prepare for an IPO. Altman, on the other hand, has pushed to do it as fast as possible.


The differing approaches show just how tricky Friar’s job is becoming as she helps steer OpenAI through the most crucial stretch of its eleven-year-history. If she moves too slowly, OpenAI could fall behind and hit the market behind Anthropic, missing out on pools of investor money. Move too quickly, and she could stretch the business too far.

In other words, she doesn’t have much room for error.

The company said this past week that its business was “firing on all cylinders,” and that Friar remained optimistic about buying more computing power. She said on LinkedIn that OpenAI’s latest model was a giant leap for coding, currently the hottest application for AI.

Northern Ireland to Goldman
Friar cuts an imposing figure when she walks into any room. She is known for her strategic acumen and comfort in the corporate norms of Wall Street, including a fondness for scheduled meetings and slide decks that ensure nothing is left to chance. Altman, by contrast, likes to come up with ideas on the fly, and is known to duck out of a room almost as soon as he enters it.

Friar, 53, grew up in a mill town in Northern Ireland during the Troubles, as the three decades of conflict over the region’s future are known. Her mother was a nurse and midwife, and her father worked as a personnel manager at the mill. She left for Oxford where she earned an engineering degree in metallurgy, economics and management and rowed crew.

She did an internship at a gold mine in Ghana but has said she felt she didn’t feel welcome given the lack of women who were there. She went to work for McKinsey, which sent her to South Africa just after apartheid ended. She calls the period a major influence in her life.

She got her M.B.A. at Stanford, where she met her future husband. Goldman Sachs then offered her a job and helped with a visa to stay in the U.S.

Friar worked at the bank for more than a decade as an investment banker and research analyst, putting her in the running for partner. And then one morning, she got the phone call that it wasn’t her turn. Friar had to hold back tears in the office, she said in a 2023 Stanford Business School interview. Her husband, David Riley, told her to see it as an opportunity to try something new.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff pulled her out of Goldman in 2011 to work in finance at the rising software giant. Then, just a year later, Jack Dorsey hired her as the chief financial officer of Square, a fledgling payments startup with only a few hundred employees.

One of her biggest tests came in 2015, when she had to take Square public in what was a gloomy year for IPOs. Friar struggled to drum up investor interest, who were turned off by the company’s losses. Bankers told her that they would have to cut Square’s share price. “It was awful,” Friar said in the Stanford interview.

On the night of pricing, they considered scrapping the IPO. But there was a sense of obligation; people had flown into New York to ring the bell. Instead, Friar and her bankers agreed to sell less than 10% of the company and price the stock at $9 a share, valuing the company at roughly $3 billion, or half its previous valuation.

Three years later, the stock had shot up.

Ready for a CEO role of her own, Friar found one in the social-networking app Nextdoor.

Nextdoor was a fraction the size of Square, both in terms of employees and valuation. The pandemic injected life into the company: people needed their neighbors for finding anything from toilet paper to friendship.

In 2021, investors poured money into newly public companies, creating the frothiest IPO market in decades. That year, the company merged with a special-purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, to list shares under the ticker KIND. Friar, who often talked about cultivating kindness in community, picked the ticker symbol.

Unlike at Square, Nextdoor’s stock didn’t take off. It tumbled.

The ticker may have been KIND, but the site often wasn’t. Comments could be racist or just sniping between neighbors. In February 2024, Nextdoor’s stock traded around $2 a share, down more than 70% from when it went public. The company announced Friar’s departure.

A few months later, Friar accepted the CFO job at OpenAI.

Trying for order at OpenAI
OpenAI was squaring off against its largest shareholder Microsoft. The tech giant held significant control over the business and was fighting for a large stake in it as part of its restructuring into a for-profit corporation.


Friar worked with Goldman Sachs, where she is still held in high regard, to advise OpenAI on the negotiations. The bank is expected to play a leading role in the company’s IPO.

More importantly, she had been friends with Microsoft CFO Amy Hood ever since the two worked together in their 20s at the bank. That relationship became crucial when the two companies set out to rework their technology partnership last year, in a monthslong negotiation that took a series of twists and turns.

Some OpenAI employees involved in the talks had struggled to get on the same terms as Hood, who came to be known for her tough, unsparing style, according to people familiar with the matter. Friar was a key bridge, and would sometimes fly to Microsoft’s headquarters to sit down with her fellow CFO and get the deal back on track.

OpenAI and Microsoft announced a revised agreement last fall, and another one this past week.

After Meta launched a talent raid on OpenAI last year, offering its researchers pay packages that topped $100 million, Friar worked with research chief Mark Chen to come up with a new framework for approaching compensation that allowed the startup to stay financially competitive without losing discipline.

Friar has been tight-lipped about the company’s public listing plans, even to some of OpenAI’s closest investors. But since last fall, she has been racing to get it ready, hiring a slew of new finance and accounting professionals and kick-starting informal conversations with banks.

Then came a slowdown in OpenAI’s business.

A new version of Google’s Gemini app stole market share from ChatGPT, and the company missed its target of reaching 1 billion weekly active users for the chatbot by the end of last year. (It still hasn’t announced this milestone.) The bleeding continued after Anthropic’s coding tool Claude Code took off among software developers, and OpenAI missed some internal revenue targets.

A company spokesman said the company has internal goals that are different from what it shared with investors. He said the company hit its revenue plans in the first quarter, but declined to specify.

Friar has taken a closer look at OpenAI’s spending commitments, and has privately suggested waiting until 2027 for an IPO, cautioning that the company isn’t yet ready to meet the rigorous reporting standards required of public companies, The Journal has reported.

She is up against a ticking clock.

Banks have told both Anthropic and OpenAI that whoever makes it to market first will get to define the new industry. If Anthropic succeeds in pulling off a mega-IPO, it could suck the wind out of OpenAI. There are large pools of cash eager to back new AI companies, and the first mover will get first dibs.

FT : Q&A: Am I a professional investor?

Q&A: Am I a professional investor?
The City regulator is set to change the rules on client categorisation

This time last year, it was a simple question with a simple answer. Yet a consultation by the City watchdog means the line between professional and retail investors is about to be redrawn. 

In December 2025, the Financial Conduct Authority outlined proposed changes to the UK’s client categorisation regime. Under the current rules, retail investors must meet at least two of three criteria to be considered a “professional investor”: making 10 significant trades per quarter over the past year; holding a portfolio of above £500,000; or having at least a year’s professional experience in financial services.

The changes, expected to be confirmed later this year, aim to give firms more discretion when assessing whether a retail investor can be bumped up to professional status. In simple terms, a professional investor is someone deemed capable of understanding complex investments and thus permitted to invest in high-risk assets.

Would you qualify — and what would it mean if you did?

Why might you want to be classed as a “professional”?
The status opens the door to higher-risk investments, including private equity, hedge funds and structured products. The majority of these, including minibonds, peer-to-peer loans and certain crowdfunding investments, are restricted for retail investors as they are considered too risky or complex.  

The upside, in theory, is the potential for higher returns. Yet riskier investments have the potential for big losses as well as gains. Tim Jenkins, director of Jencap Partners, says: “When losses occur, hindsight bites hard.” If you’re considering a move into professional status, you need to be comfortable with a higher level of risk. 

Do you have enough money?
The FCA proposes that individuals with £10mn or more in investable assets can opt for professional status if they request it. Crucially, they would not face the more detailed assessment applied to investors with a lower net worth.

However, as Dan Moczulski, UK managing director at online broker eToro, pointed out, “being wealthy does not automatically make someone a sophisticated investor”.  

As a safeguard, the FCA has said those who qualify would still need to give informed consent and would be warned about the protections they will lose.

Do you understand the risks — and can you afford them?
For everyone else, the test is more subjective. Those who don’t meet the £10mn threshold will face a rigorous assessment of their experience and understanding.

First, firms will look at whether you genuinely understand investment risks. Under the new system, employment in the financial services industry will no longer be assumed to have given a client the capabilities of a professional investor. Equally, knowledge and experience found in other sectors will not be automatically discounted. 

Your investment history will also be considered, although frequent trading will no longer be used to determine whether you are a professional investor. Someone who has traded actively in crypto markets, for example, may feel experienced, but that alone would not necessarily mark them as sophisticated.

Firms will also weigh your understanding and ability to assess risk. For example, do you understand the benefits of a diversified portfolio? Do you know what leverage is, and how it could enhance your investment positions? In practice, firms take various approaches to assessing an investor’s suitability, including online questionnaires, adviser conversations, and reviews of past investment behaviour.

Your financial resilience will also be taken into account. If you cannot afford to bear any potential losses, that alone could be enough to disqualify you.

What “red flags” would a firm be wary of?
Even if you appear to meet the criteria, assessors are expected to consider any warning signs in your personal investment history. If you invest mainly in speculative, high-risk assets — such as cryptocurrencies — or leveraged products, this could harm your case, unless you can afford the losses or present strong evidence that you meet the other criteria.

Problems in your trading history, namely a failure to settle margin calls on a timely basis, would also count against you. If you provide any information that is inconsistent or implausible, this will also be flagged. 

Firms will also look out for signs of “vulnerability”, such as poor financial resilience, limited investment knowledge or major life events such as illness or a family bereavement. Any one of these could indicate that an investor should not be treated as “professional”, even if they appear to meet the formal criteria.

Do you understand the protections you are giving up?
Your motivation also matters: why do you want to opt out of retail protections in the first place?

The trade-off for professional status is clear: greater freedom, but fewer safeguards. Firms will assume you understand the risks of each investment, and thus there will be fewer checks on whether a product is appropriate for you. You may also lose access to regulatory redress in the event of an investment going wrong.

Of course, firms must still act in your best interests. In short, you are not unprotected, but you are expected to take an active role in protecting yourself more than you did before. For some, that might just be enough to convince them to keep their retail protections in place.

FT : Swiss plan to cap population gains ground ahead of referendum

Swiss plan to cap population gains ground ahead of referendum
Proposal to limit inhabitants to 10mn people branded as ‘chaos initiative’ by business lobby

A referendum on capping Switzerland’s population at 10mn people is gaining support just weeks ahead of the contentious vote.

The so-called 10mn initiative, led by the rightwing Swiss People’s Party, is backed by 52 per cent of voters, according to a survey published this week by polling institute LeeWas. The trend comes despite strong opposition from business groups and the federal government, ahead of the June 14 vote on the proposal.

Business and industry groups have warned that any curbs on immigration will limit access to skilled labour and undermine growth.

Economiesuisse, the main business lobby, has labelled it a “chaos initiative” and has cautioned it risks damaging Switzerland’s competitiveness and destabilising ties with the EU, its largest trading partner.

The proposal echoes rising anti-immigrant sentiment across Europe that has reshaped political agendas and boosted support for nationalist parties. The issue has become a defining political faultline, influencing both elections and referendum campaigns.

“The results of the poll this week are a big call to action — people realise it is going to be a heated campaign and there is no certainty of the outcome,” said Frédéric Rochat, managing partner at Geneva-based private bank Lombard Odier.

“The trigger point is initially positive — Switzerland has gained attractiveness in a more uncertain world and net migration has increased significantly. But Swiss people are now feeling similar emotions to those seen in Britain before Brexit — a desire to take back control,” he said.

The campaign is expected to be closely fought, with both sides of the political spectrum intensifying efforts to sway undecided voters.

Much of the unease is directed at migration from the EU, which has risen steadily since Switzerland joined the border-free Schengen area in 2008. It is seen by some as contributing to rising rents and straining public services in cities such as Zurich and Geneva.

A “yes” vote would put Bern on a collision course with Brussels, as any curbs to free movement would be in breach of Switzerland’s obligations as part of its accords with the EU and as a member of the Schengen area.

Critics also point out that the initiative leaves key questions over implementation unanswered, with no clear roadmap for how a population cap will be enforced in practice.

Switzerland’s population has risen to more than 9mn, with official data showing foreign nationals accounted for almost 30 per cent last year. Large Swiss multinationals such as consumer group Nestlé, pharmaceutical companies Novartis and Roche, as well as private markets group Partners Group, rely heavily on foreign talent.

Beyond the proposed population cap, a more complex debate is unfolding over Switzerland’s long-term immigration model. The country operates a dual system: relatively open access for EU citizens under bilateral free movement agreements alongside strict quotas for workers from outside the bloc, who are typically admitted only if they possess highly sought-after skills.

Some policymakers and business leaders favour a shift towards a more selective “Singapore-style” model, where immigration is tightly managed based on economic needs. But such a move would be incompatible with Switzerland’s accords with the EU.

Denis Machuel, chief executive of Adecco, the world’s largest staffing company, said Switzerland’s population growth had “outpaced most European neighbours”, fuelling calls for “appropriate control measures”. But he warned that restricting access to skilled foreign workers or abandoning free movement with the EU would not benefit the country “economically or societally”.

Michael Hermann of Zurich-based pollster Sotomo said that while support for popular initiatives typically declined after initial polling, immigration-related votes had been an exception, with surveys sometimes underestimating the final outcome. “The race is still wide open, but the initiative has a good chance of being accepted,” he said.

The federal government has acknowledged concerns over housing shortages and infrastructure strain but has yet to put forward a comprehensive response.

A proposal last month to tighten rules on real estate purchases from non-EU citizens was intended to signal action but has been widely criticised as insufficient and poorly targeted.

“I think [the latest poll] should be a wake-up call to both the government and opponents of the initiative to get serious,” said an executive at a multinational company based in Switzerland.

“There need to be more credible proposals on urban development planning, as well as clearer thinking on what kind of immigration model Switzerland wants.”

FT : Wealthy raid their pensions to avoid UK inheritance tax shake-up, advisers

Wealthy raid their pensions to avoid UK inheritance tax shake-up, advisers warn
Unused retirement savings could be taxed as part of overall estates after next year’s reforms

Wealthy families are fast-tracking lump-sum gifts to adult children and bringing forward planned pension income withdrawals ahead of a major inheritance tax shake-up next year.

Advisers and pension providers report a surge in access requests from clients with larger-than-average defined contribution pots, as concerns grow over a potential tax hit.

The urgency stems from reforms taking effect in April 2027, which will bring most unused pension wealth into the scope of inheritance tax.

The government estimates that in 2027-28, an additional 10,500 estates will face IHT after the change, and 38,500 will pay more — adding an average of £34,000 to liabilities.

“There’s now less than a year left before any unused pension savings could be included as part of pension savers’ estates for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes,” said Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, the investment platform.

“The new rules have forced many people saving for retirement to rethink their plans and deal with a tax they never expected when they started putting money into their pension.”

From April 6 next year, unused pensions could face a 40 per cent IHT charge if the total estate exceeds the nil-rate band of £325,000.

Advisers say interest is rising in the main exemptions that can reduce inheritance tax liability. 

These include the £3,000 annual gifting allowance, as well as the “seven-year rule”, under which no tax is typically due on gifts if you live for seven years after making them.

Another option is making regular payments to another person — for example, to help with living costs — provided these can be sustained after meeting your own usual expenses. These are known as “normal expenditure out of income”.

Royal London is among several major pension providers noting an increase in requests for tax-free cash linked to the IHT change.

“We have received a lot of questions from financial advisers about clients who want to gift large amounts to children for house purchases, for example, and that could often come from tax free cash,” said Clare Moffat, pensions and tax expert with Royal London.

“We have also had many queries from advisers about using the normal expenditure from income inheritance tax exemption.”

Jason Hollands, managing director of Evelyn Partners, the wealth manager, believes the IHT change is “likely playing a role” in clients accessing their pensions earlier and in larger amounts, particularly among non-advised investors on the firm’s Bestinvest platform.

Among their advised clients, he said, they are seeing increased “consideration” of earlier or larger pension withdrawals.

Sean McCann, chartered financial planner at NFU Mutual, is also seeing evidence of clients taking lump sums earlier in response to the IHT change, with many relying on the “gifts from normal expenditure” exemption. As these gifts are immediately outside the estate, there is no need to survive seven years.

“Gifts out of normal expenditure are one of the most valuable but least well-known inheritance tax exemptions, allowing those with surplus income to pass on wealth through regular gifting,” said McCann.

“There is no upper limit on the amount that can be given away, as it depends on an individual’s income and standard of living.”

He added: “As the exemption isn’t claimed until after death it’s important to keep records of your income, expenditure and gifts.”

With awareness of this surplus income exemption rising, advisers say it is important to seek advice as it is not “straightforward”.

“The question about whether gifts can be made out of pension income is potentially a tricky one,” said Elsa Littlewood, private wealth partner with BDO, the accountants.

“Where Mum and Dad have purchased an annuity for life, which gives them excess income, it seems reasonable that this could be gifted to their children (or other beneficiaries) under the gifts out of income exemption.

“However, where someone accesses their pension through flexible drawdown over a relatively short period, I can see a situation where [HMRC] might challenge a claim for gifts out of income. Individuals looking to use this exemption should proceed with caution and ensure they take tax advice from a specialist.”

Christine Ross, head of private office, north, with Handelsbanken, the wealth manager, advises clients to tread carefully with the “surplus income” exemption.

“We advise clients to ensure that this is documented and that gifts are made at a similar frequency and of a similar amount, to qualify.”

FT : US to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany in dispute over Iran conflict

US to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany in dispute over Iran conflict
Donald Trump retaliates against Friedrich Merz over chancellor’s criticism of US-Israeli war effort

The Pentagon will withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany amid a public spat between US President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over Washington’s Iran war.

The troops will be withdrawn within the next year, the defence department said. Germany hosts the largest number of US troops in Europe, along with several major American military installations.

US defence secretary Pete Hegseth “has ordered the withdrawal of approximately 5,000 troops from Germany”, chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said on Friday.

“This decision follows a thorough review of the department’s force posture in Europe and is in recognition of theatre requirements and conditions on the ground,” he added. “We expect the withdrawal to be completed over the next six to 12 months.”

The Iran conflict has strained transatlantic ties, with the US president accusing Washington’s European allies of not doing enough to support the war effort. The economic fallout is hitting Europe hard as energy prices have soared, triggering accusations from important US allies that they are bearing a heavy burden for a fight they did not support.

The economic fallout has become a full-blown domestic crisis in Germany.

The tensions between the US and Europe over the Iran war have been even more acute than they were last year over trade and have raised fears of an enduring strategic rift that could also threaten the Nato alliance.

The Pentagon’s decision came after Merz and Trump traded barbs over the war. Merz on Monday said the US was “being humiliated” by Iran, and that it went into the conflict “without any strategy” and had “no truly convincing strategy in the negotiations either”.

Trump on Thursday launched a review of American troop levels in Germany and wrote on social media that Merz “should spend more time on ending the war with Russia/Ukraine . . . and fixing his broken Country”.

“He’s doing a terrible job”, Trump told reporters of Merz on Tuesday. “He’s got immigration problems, he’s got energy problems, he’s got problems of all kind[s]”.

Merz “criticised me for doing the whole thing with Iran. But I said: ‘Would you like to have a nuclear weapon in the hands of Iran’? He said, ‘No, I don’t’. I said, ‘Well, then I guess I’m right.’ He didn’t have any answer to that,” Trump added.

The president on Friday said he would increase tariffs on EU cars to 25 per cent. Washington has also warned some European allies to expect long delivery delays for US weapons as it tries to replenish its own stockpiles depleted by the Iran war.

About 36,400 US troops are in Germany and roughly 80,000 American troops are in Europe.

The headquarters of US European Command and US Africa Command, which oversee American military operations in those two regions, are in Stuttgart. Germany is also home to Ramstein Air Base and Landstuhl Regional Medical Center.

Trump has also threatened to pull troops out of Italy and Spain, which he has criticised for being unsupportive of the Israeli-US war effort. The US has about 12,600 troops in Italy and 3,800 in Spain.

The president on Thursday said he would “probably” consider withdrawing troops from Italy and Spain.

“Why shouldn’t I? Italy has not been of any help to us. And Spain has been horrible, absolutely horrible.”

Jack Reed, the senior Democrat on the Senate armed services committee, called on Trump to reverse his “foolish” decision.

“Weakening our military footprint in Europe at a time when Russian forces continue to mercilessly attack Ukraine and harass our Nato allies is a priceless gift to Vladimir Putin and suggests American commitments to our allies are dependent on the president’s mood,” he said.

FT : Meta stock might look cheap if it weren’t for Mark Zuckerberg

Meta stock might look cheap if it weren’t for Mark Zuckerberg
Not only is the Facebook boss spinning a lot of plates, but his worldview is not like that of a typical chief executive

It was both a bad week for Meta Platforms, and a great one. The Facebook owner’s shares fell 10 per cent after it reported earnings on Wednesday, yet its sales and profit are growing at what, for normal companies, would inspire jubilation. This contradiction isn’t so strange, because there are really two Metas: the one that exists, and the one Mark Zuckerberg is building. One somewhat offsets the other.

Look from a distance and Meta is a surprisingly simple business. Almost all of its revenue comes from selling ads on Facebook and Instagram. Growth is driven by two fairly uncomplicated levers: how many ads it serves, and how much it charges advertisers for each ad. Those have sometimes swung around wildly, but now are both growing smartly. Meta’s ad sales in the latest quarter grew 33 per cent, the fastest rate since September 2021.


That simplicity is also a problem for investors. Ad sales are cyclical, but Meta’s costs aren’t, and its vast spending on AI — which may now hit $145bn this year — follows a different cycle altogether. The more debt it adds to its once-pristine balance sheet, including a $25bn bond sale it disclosed on Thursday, the more the effect is amplified.

The mismatch understandably makes investors nervous. While Google parent Alphabet depends mostly on ads too, it has more diversified revenue. By selling cloud computing and now microchips that it designs, its revenue is more closely linked to the AI infrastructure cycle.


What weighs more on Meta’s valuation is probably Zuckerberg himself. First, he is spinning a lot of plates, from building data centres and selling “smart glasses” to making, and possibly unwinding, big acquisitions. But more importantly, his worldview is not like that of a typical chief executive. As he told analysts on Wednesday, when it comes to developing new products, making a profit doesn’t just come second: it comes fourth, after quality, then scale, then working out a revenue model.

Sometimes, as with its Reels video product, that works. Sometimes, as with the mothballed Metaverse, it doesn’t. As for how superintelligence will make a profit, Zuckerberg seemingly doesn’t think it matters yet.

If all AI does is continue to help Meta grow ad sales faster than the market rate, that’s not half bad; the stock may even look cheap. Analysts forecast that revenue growth will slip below 20 per cent by 2028, according to LSEG. Keep that rate at 25 per cent and, all else being equal, its earnings would beat consensus estimates for that year by a third.

But the friction between how investors think and how Zuckerberg does is stark, and explains why Meta trades at a lower price-to-earnings multiple than the rest of the so-called Magnificent 7. As the company’s controlling shareholder, he’s here to stay. But when the Facebook founder says, as he did this week, that what drives humanity forward is “people pursuing their individual aspirations”, investors should take him at his word.