WSJ : Record-Setting Heat Wave Engulfs Pacific Northwest

Record-Setting Heat Wave Engulfs Pacific Northwest
Seattle and Portland, Ore., face health emergencies as temperatures leap 30 degrees above normal

SEATTLE—Temperatures reached record highs in the Pacific Northwest over the weekend, resulting in heat-related emergencies and the lifting of some pandemic-related restrictions. The stretch of triple-digit weather, about 30 degrees hotter than normal for this part of the country, is expected to continue through Monday.

The 102 degrees seen at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on Saturday was the second-highest ever recorded there, the National Weather Service said. The 108 degrees forecast for Monday would surpass the city’s record of 103 degrees.

The fire department responded to at least 12 heat-related emergencies in Seattle on Saturday, city officials said. Emergency departments and urgent-care centers in Portland, Ore., saw 14 cases that mentioned heat from Friday to Sunday afternoon, compared with none on a typical day this time of year, health officials said.

Portland reached a record high of 109 degrees Sunday afternoon, breaking the record of 108 it set on Saturday. Before this weekend, the last time the city hit 107 degrees was in 1981. Temperatures are predicted to hit 112 on Monday.

The Oregon Health Authority suspended pandemic-related capacity limits at swimming pools, movie theaters, shopping malls and cooling centers, as well as on public transit, to give residents more options to beat the heat. “We know that when the temperature reaches a certain point, especially when we’ve never had this type of heat for so many days, it’s a public-health emergency,” said Dan Douthit, a spokesman for the Portland Bureau of Emergency Management.

About 44% of homes in the Seattle area and 79% of homes in the Portland area have some form of air conditioning, according to the Census Bureau.

Officials in Seattle are urging residents to avoid outdoor activities between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. and to take advantage of air-conditioned cooling centers in libraries, community centers and emergency shelters.

Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest are typically near the 70s this time of year.

Drought conditions in states including Utah, Nevada and California helped prime the path for the Pacific Northwest’s brush with record temperatures, said Dan Petersen, a meteorologist at the National Weather Service’s Weather Prediction Center in College Park, Md. Water in soil typically absorbs a portion of the sun’s heat, lowering the overall temperature. But when there is a shortage of water, such as during a drought, heat builds up and temperatures typically remain higher, he said.

The built-up heat moved north to Oregon and Washington, spurring a heat wave that arrived earlier than most other warm stretches.

“Most of the really intense heat waves of the summer happen in July and August, and that’s particularly the case for Oregon and Washington,” Mr. Petersen said.

Electricity providers in the region braced for several days of high demand. Portland General Electric Co. , a provider in Oregon, said it has activated extra cooling systems on its essential equipment to protect against overheating.

Temperatures are expected to begin dropping below 100 degrees on Tuesday, but remain elevated through the week.

FT : Versailles transformed into Lalanne land

Versailles transformed into Lalanne land
The palace grounds are populated by creatures in an exhibition of sculptures by French artists Les Lalanne

When visitors wander into the Queen’s Hamlet, a picturesque corner of the Versailles Palace dreamt up by Marie-Antoinette, it may take them a while to notice what’s different this summer. The small village has gained new inhabitants — including two ducks looking at each other by the lake, a bronze donkey and two oversized doves.

They fit so seamlessly into their bucolic surroundings, designed in the 1780s by Richard Mique, that it’s easy to forget they are the work of two whimsical 20th-century artists: Claude and François-Xavier Lalanne, better known as “Les Lalanne”.

For half a century, the husband-and-wife team carved a niche at the crossroads of sculpture and decorative arts. Both drew from nature for their animal- and plant-inspired works, and many are cheekily designed to be used. The donkey grazing in Versailles isn’t just a statue, but opens to become a desk; the doves’ backs are carved into a chair.

Although François-Xavier died in 2008, followed by Claude in 2019, their large output has arguably never been more popular. A large sale at Sotheby’s in Paris, shortly after Claude’s death, drew more than 4,000 bidders from 43 countries, and exceeded all expectations to raise €91.3m (more than four times the estimate).

The exhibition at the Versailles Palace, west of Paris, is set to cement their place in the pantheon of French sculptors — and inject a little playfulness into visits to the venerable palace. Rather than being grouped in a single space, the Lalannes’ works are deliberately scattered around the Queen’s Hamlet, the Petit Trianon — the smaller residence gifted by Louis XVI to Marie-Antoinette — and its English gardens.

Turn a corner near the Love Monument, and you may spot a large wapiti, designed by François-Xavier, near a clearing; elsewhere, boars stalk a deer from across a small river, and sheep keep their distance from a bear. “After an hour, you feel like the works have always been there,” says Catherine Pégard, the director of the Versailles Palace.

Yet there were no plans to bring them to Versailles until March of this year. The palace usually puts on a contemporary art exhibition by a living artist each year, but after a cancelled season last year due to the pandemic, Pégard opted for caution. “We hadn’t planned anything for 2021, first due to the uncertainty, and also because our financial situation is far from easy,” she says.

Jean-Gabriel Mitterrand, a veteran art dealer and nephew of former French president François Mitterrand, saw an opportunity. A Lalanne exhibition at Versailles had been on his mind for a long time: “I had mentioned it to Claude before she died, but she was too tired,” he says. Pégard said yes — but with only three months to plan it, and find sponsors.

Dior provided financial backing: Claude designed jewellery for designer Maria Grazia Chiuri’s first collection there in 2017, one of the Lalannes’ many brushes with fashion. (Yves Saint Laurent was a major early supporter of the pair.) And Mitterrand, who started working with Claude and François-Xavier in 1975 and went on to represent them via his own Galerie Mitterrand, persuaded their four daughters to lend 70 per cent of the roughly 50 artworks on display.

While the Lalannes often made copies of their designs, some of the sculptures at Versailles have rarely been seen. François-Xavier’s “Bar Autruches”, with its two porcelain ostriches holding a bar counter in their beaks, was commissioned in the 1970s by president Georges Pompidou for the Elysée Palace, where it still stands today. Only a handful are in circulation, and the Sèvres porcelain is too fragile to open the ostriches’ wings or to pour ice into the egg that stands between them. Regardless, in Versailles’ French Pavilion, where it echoes a golden frieze dotted with birds, it looks spectacular.

“A fundamental principle of the Lalannes’ work is to make sculpture useful,” Mitterrand says. In the recently restored Cool Pavilion stands a lush piece by Claude, the “Lit Singerie”, whose monkeys swinging from branches overlook the bed; inside the neoclassical Belvédère, another bed — François-Xavier’s “Cocodoll”, which is shaped like a seagull — seems as if it’s waiting for Marie-Antoinette to lounge on it.

Even though they rose to fame as a duo, the Lalannes actually worked separately. According to Mitterrand, they only co-created “three or four” pieces over the course of their lives. At home, their studios were separate. “They always said: we share a bedroom, but not a studio,” Mitterrand says. “At the end of their work days, they had a little reunion. They would talk about their work, and usually they were in agreement.”

The Lalannes shared Surrealist influences and a love of nature, but each had a distinctive style, too. “François-Xavier had a love of classical French paintings and worked with very strict, pure lines, while Claude was more baroque,” Mitterrand says. While her husband worked from drawings, Claude revived a 19th-century process known as electrotyping, or galvanoplasty, to reproduce her models.

“She would dip flowers and plants into a moulding material, and then use the mould to craft bronzes. It allowed her to work as close to nature as possible,” Mitterrand says. The only human figure in the exhibition is also by Claude: “Olympe”, a fountain installed near the Belvédère, is based on a moulding of one of her granddaughters.

At home, where the pair often entertained, their sculptures weren’t merely for show. Guests were occasionally invited to use Claude’s leaf-inspired cutlery or François-Xavier’s duck-shaped salt shaker. Yet Mitterrand insists their creations weren’t “functional” per se. “When you use a Lalanne piece, it doesn’t serve you: you serve the work. Claude’s cutlery, for instance, had to be handled elegantly. It requires you to invent a relationship with each piece.”

Art collectors are now queueing up to buy works by the Lalannes in the wake of a series of major exhibitions and sales, starting with the auction of Yves Saint Laurent and Pierre Bergé’s collection in 2009. The 2019 Sotheby’s sale, which served to pay for inheritance taxes on the Lalannes’ family collection, helped to spread pieces around the world, Mitterrand says. This spring and summer the Clark Art Institute in Williamstown, Massachusetts, is also hosting the first museum exhibition devoted to the Lalannes in the US in over 40 years.

The next step might be a permanent exhibition space to host the Lalannes’ quirky menagerie — perhaps at the pair’s former home near Paris, which now belongs to one of their daughters. “Perhaps it could remain an artists’ house, open to visitors,” Mitterrand says. “We may yet be able to do it.”

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • EasyJet (EJT1 TH) +2.5%
  • Nibe (NJB TH) +1.9%
  • Rio Tinto (RIO1 TH) +1.6%
  • Reckitt (3RB TH) +1.5%
  • Rolls-Royce (RRU TH) +1.4%
  • Carnival Plc (POH1 TH) +1.3%
  • BAT (BMT TH) +1.2%
  • Glaxo (GS7 TH) +1.2%
  • Unibail (1BR1 TH) -1%
    • Unibail Cut to Sell at SocGen; PT 67.30 euros
  • Rational (RAA TH) -1.2%
  • Christian Dior (DIO TH) -1.3%
  • Recordati (RER1 TH) -1.6%
  • TUI (TUI1 TH) -2%
  • TeamViewer (TMV TH) -2%
    • TeamViewer Cut to Neutral at Goldman; PT 37 euros

>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • No major moves
MDAX:
  • Hochtief (HOT TH) +1.5%
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) +1.2%
  • Nordex (NDX1 TH) +1.2%
  • Aroundtown (AT1 TH) +1.1%
  • Thyssenkrupp (TKA TH) +1%
  • Fraport (FRA TH) -1%
SDAX:
  • SMA Solar (S92 TH) +3%
  • ADVA Optical (ADV TH) +2.3%
  • Adler Group (ADJ TH) +1.3%
    • Watch Berlin Landlords Amid Tenant Expropriation Campaign
  • Kloeckner (KCO TH) +1.2%
  • Hamborner REIT (HABA TH) +1.2%
  • Hornbach Holding (HBH TH) -1.2%
  • SAF-Holland SE (SFQ TH) -1.2%
  • Deutz (DEZ TH) -1.4%

FT : Inside the secretive private equity firm behind the £6.8bn Asda buyout

Inside the secretive private equity firm behind the £6.8bn Asda buyout
With the help of US hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones, two bankers built TDR into an ‘old world’ force

An oak-panelled Victorian pub, The Coach Makers Arms is owned by a daisy chain of corporate entities that leads to the secretive offshore tax haven of Jersey — and ends a stone’s throw from its own front door near London’s Oxford Street.

The structure was arranged by the private equity firm TDR Capital, whose executives decided in 2017 to buy their local watering hole across the street.

Now TDR is using a similarly complex model for its biggest deal yet: the £6.8bn debt-fuelled acquisition of the supermarket chain Asda from Walmart, which the Competition and Markets Authority cleared earlier this month.

It is the UK’s largest leveraged buyout since KKR took over Alliance Boots 14 years ago. It puts the future of Asda’s 145,000 staff, and a crucial component of the country’s food supply, in the hands of investors about which little is known.


A ‘family office’
Led by former bankers Manjit Dale and Stephen Robertson, TDR was set up as Tudor Dale Robertson, with capital from US hedge fund billionaire Paul Tudor Jones.

Dale, a dominant figure at the firm, who smokes heated tobacco sticks during meetings, first worked with Robertson at Bankers Trust in London in 1995, four years before it was acquired by Deutsche Bank. Their deals included setting up Punch Taverns in 1998 and selling the chain to buyout group TPG the following year.

In 2002, Dale and Robertson, then aged 37 and 42, struck out on their own. A former colleague who had moved to Tudor Investment Corporation brokered an introduction to his new employer and Tudor committed about €155m for the pair’s €550m first fund.

Over two decades, a few things have changed — notably the amount of money investors are willing to provide. TDR’s latest fund, its fourth, manages €3.5bn. Jones’s company is no longer formally involved but is entitled to €1m per year from TDR forever, the result of a handshake deal in the early 2000s. Jones and his investment firm declined to comment.

But what has stayed remarkably consistent is a small team investing large sums of their own money and concentrating on a handful of deals. While many private equity firms have evolved from scrappy bands of dealmakers into institutions with layers of checks and balances, TDR has stuck closer to the old model.

“I dislike bureaucracy intensely,” Dale told the FT in a rare interview. “You know, I want us to make good business decisions with as little fuss as possible. And that’s why we’re one central office, one team. It’s all fairly compact. You can go around and see all the key people on anything that you want to talk about within half an hour, if that.”

The majority of those key people are men. Even by the standards of the private equity industry, TDR is male-dominated. All 12 partners, except the head of investor relations, are men, and it has never had a female dealmaking partner. Dale declined to comment.

TDR’s own executives are typically the single largest group of investors in its funds, contributing around 10 to 15 per cent, well above the 5.5 per cent that the data firm Preqin said is the average for buyout funds. “You have to work on the principle that it is basically the family office of Manjit and Steve,” said a person who has worked closely with TDR.

It’s important to “eat your own cooking”, Dale said. “I think it’s a good discipline. And if you’re successful, you also happen to do quite well over time.”

The focus extends to hands-on due diligence. When TDR acquired 332 pubs from Mitchells & Butlers in 2010, the firm’s executives visited every single one, according to people close to the deal.


Financial engineering at the gym
One element of TDR’s investment approach is rooted in their early Bankers Trust days, said the same person who has worked with Dale and Robertson: “You buy an asset, take your money back, and sit with a free option on the upside.”

The firm bought the gym chain David Lloyd in 2013 using £190m from its fund and £528.5m in debt, company filings show. Since then, TDR has recouped more than £550m in dividends and other repayments, almost three times its initial investment. That has been paid for in part by piling fresh debt on to a company that now owes more than £1bn.

“What allowed TDR to cash out was simple financial engineering, or increases in debt,” said Peter Morris, an associate scholar at Oxford university’s Saïd Business School. “That meant David Lloyd was more vulnerable than it needed to be when the pandemic hit.”

During lockdowns, the gym group tapped the UK government’s furlough scheme and the German government’s Covid-19 aid programme.

Dale said the gym chain had weathered the pandemic “better than most of its competitors” and “is now well positioned to take advantage of its market-leading position, as shown by the record number of new members joining since restrictions have been eased and the recent highly successful refinancing which was heavily oversubscribed”.

While TDR said this month that it would “inject £100m into the company” as part of a £350m “equity contribution”, that is also funded by debt: a loan from specialist lender 17Capital against the value of the other companies TDR owns and “payment-in-kind” notes from outside investors, a form of lending where borrowers can defer interest and repay with further debt.

TDR has already taken back more than the roughly €250m it originally invested in EG Group, the highly-leveraged petrol station company it owns with co-founders Mohsin and Zuber Issa, two people with knowledge of the matter said.

That deal paved the way for the acquisition of Asda, again with the Issas. Though the supermarket group is valued at £6.8bn, TDR and the Issas will stump up just £780m of their own money, with the rest coming from selling off some of Asda’s assets and increasing its debt burden. And the £780m, just 11.5 per cent of the deal price, comes at least partly from taking cash out of EG Group.

Old school
Alongside pubs, gyms and petrol stations, TDR has invested in discount retail and cruise ships, sectors hit hard by the pandemic. It has this year agreed to buy the debt collector Arrow Global and Aggreko, a supplier of power generators.

“It’s an old-world portfolio, like most of the UK economy is an old-world economy,” Dale said. “Our belief, which is actually the theme of a lot of our investment, is that there is no reason for incumbents not to innovate, apart from their own structures and their lack of vision. And we can inject and change both of those things and apply capital.” 

TDR has never yet had a portfolio company go bust, though in 2017 it got into a gruelling fight with bondholders over the future of Algeco, a modular space leasing company it has owned since 2004. The lenders sued over TDR’s plans to transfer control of a valuable US subsidiary to its own hands, in a case that was later settled.

By September 2020, those in its third fund, which holds its EG Group stake, had made a net internal rate of return — a measure private equity firms use to calculate their annual performance — of 34.1 per cent according to data published by an investor, the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund, putting it comfortably in the top quartile of buyout groups.

But its second fund, raised in 2007, had a net internal rate of return of just 6.9 per cent by September 2020, according to a presentation shared with investors.

“This fund is pretty much the definition of mediocre,” a private funds specialist said. “It’s not what people invest in private equity to get.”

Dale said the performance of Algeco was a drag but that it was “comfortably a second-quartile fund in terms of multiple of money returned”.

Personal dealings
Details of how private equity executives are paid are typically difficult to track down. But accounts for TDR Capital LLP shed some light. It has paid out £293.9m to its members — mostly TDR executives — since it was set up, out of £526.8m in revenues, Morris’s analysis of Companies House records shows.

The payments, the equivalent of salaries, do not include carried interest, the mechanism by which private equity executives typically receive a 20 per cent share of profits.


Dale said the payments were “drawings paid out of profits, are not contractually guaranteed and are dependent on continued performance by the partnership and its members”.

While TDR’s investors include large US pension funds such as the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System and Japan’s Norinchukin Bank, there is also a cohort of “family and friends” who pay lower management fees.

They include Paul Tudor Jones, Carphone Warehouse co-founder David Ross, who chaired TDR-owned PizzaExpress and Stephen Short, a partner at the law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, who has advised TDR. “There are plenty of [investors], and more important ones than me in there,” Short told the FT.

Several of TDR’s dealmakers have personally bought stakes in companies that the buyout firm is not involved with. Some of them are backing a group of former employees of Greensill Capital, the supply chain finance group that collapsed in a financial and political scandal this year, to start a new venture called Silver Birch.


Dale has invested in Flight Club, a chain of darts-themed bars, and The Double Red Duke, a 16th-century hotel near his Cotswolds home.

All their previous ventures pale in comparison to a multibillion pound deal with the world’s largest retailer, however. And overhauling Asda could drag TDR into the spotlight.

“Buyouts of big retail-oriented companies inevitably bring a higher profile,” Morris said. “When TDR becomes involved with Asda, it may be harder for them to stay under the radar.”

>>> What to look at today - 28th of June 2021

Asia stocks and U.S. futures were steady Monday with investors weighing the pace of economic recovery against more potent Covid-19 strains and central banks mulling stimulus reductions. The dollar edged higher.
Southeast Asian markets underperformed, led by Malaysia, where a nationwide lockdown was extended. Australia saw a modest dip despite a lockdown in Sydney to contain outbreaks of the highly contagious Delta strain. Japan and China fluctuated. Hong Kong will open for trading in the afternoon after the morning session was canceled because of a rain storm warning. European futures were little changed. The S&P 500 had its best week since February. Treasuries held losses.
Cryptocurrencies will be closely watched after the U.K. restricted an affiliate of crypto exchange Binance from doing business in the country. Bitcoin rose for a second day, trading in the mid-$30,000s range in Asia on Monday.

Nikkei -0.14% Hang Seng +1.40% CSI +0.11% Shanghai -0.08% Shenzen +0.87%

Eur$ 1.1926 CNH 6.4654 CNY 6.4611 JPY 110.65 GBP 1.3896 CHF 0.9183 RUB 72.2207 TRY 8.7336 WTI$ 74.11 +0.08% Gold 1,783.30 +0.11% BTC 34,432 +1410 ETH 1,970 +140

S&P +0.09% Nasdaq +0.16% EuroStoxx -0.02% FTSE +0.05% Dax +0.08% SMI -0.05%

Macro :
- Germany Seeks to Ban U.K. Travelers From EU: Times
- PBOC Backs Words With Action to Steady Market Rates: China Today
- U.S., EU Willing to Review Venezuela Sanctions on Conditions
- How Quants at Dimensional Deal With This Year’s Meme-Stock Craze

Spacs :
- Pershing Square SPARC Holdings Filed S-1 Confidentially
- Virgin Galactic Jumps as FAA Clears Customer Space Flights

Keep an eye on :
- AIR FP : United Air Seen Finalizing Its Largest-Ever Narrow-Body Jet Deal
- AIR FP : SpaceX Aims to Launch Orbital Starship Flight in July: CNBC
- AIR FP : Airbus Offers Switzerland Eurofighter Assembly to Win Order: SZ
- AZN LN : AstraZeneca Diabetes Treatment Meets Endpoint in Phase III
- AZN LN : AstraZeneca: 1st Subjects Vaccinated in New Covid Variant Trial
- ATL IM : Atlantia to Sell Stake in Lusoponte to MM Capital for EU55.7m
- CS FP : Covea Is Looking At Axa’s Reinsurance Unit: Les Echos
- BAMI IM : Banco BPM Reviews Bancassurance Agreements With Covéa
- BMPS IM : *ITALY MULLS REPLACING MONTE PASCHI CEO: CORRIERE
- GBF GY : Bilfinger Investor Cevian Capital Cuts Voting Rights to 24.98%
- BT/A LN : BT Agrees to Use OneWeb Satellites for U.K. Rural Internet Push
- BIOSGN SS : Biosergen’s BSG005 Granted Orphan Drug Status by FDA
- CSGN SW : Credit Suisse to Pay $1.5 Million to Settle CFTC Swaps Claims
- DBK GY : Deutsche Bank Compensates J Garcia-Carrion On Forex Scandal : FT
- DWNI GY : Berlin Heads for Vote on Expropriating Landlords Amid Tenant Ire
- DIDI IPO : Ride-Hailing Giant Didi Said to Close U.S. IPO Books a Day Early
- EGR FP : Transition Evergreen Launches EU55.6M Capital Increase in Paris
- ECV GY : Encavis: 42.9% of Holders Choose New Shares Instead of Cash Div.
- GSK LN : GlaxoSmithKline Said to Tap Goldman, Citi for Spinoff
- HEN3 GY : Henkel Is Open to Acquisitions, CEO Tells Rheinische Post
- HEX NO : Hexagon Purus Sets Up Maritime Unit for Hydrogen Development
- IIA AV : Immofinanz Cancels S Immo Offer After Shareholders Reject Motion
- NEWAY NA : VDL Groep Plans Response to Rival Offer for Neways by July 8
- NN NA : NN Group Confirms It Offered to Buy Some MetLife’s Europe Units
- ORPHA DC : Orphazyme to Focus Resources on Path for Arimoclomol in NPC
- PIRC IM : Pirelli Investor Longmarch to Join Tiremaker’s Holding Co.: Sole
- POLN SW : Polyphor Assesses Company’s Future After Phase III Study Failure
- SAN FP : Sanofi Says Dupixent Data Reinforces Safety Profile in Adults
- SAN FP : Sanofi Agrees to Sell 16 Consumer Healthcare Brands to Stada
- SBBB SS : SBB Holders Submitted 97.2% of SEK2.75b Bond for Conversion
- SBMO NA : SBM Offshore Gets $1.05b FPSO Financing From 11 Lenders
- STLA IM : Italy Unions Back Stellantis EV Production Plan at Melfi Plant
- ULE LN : Ultra Electronics Talks on Cobham Combination Terminated
- VOW3 GY : VW Brand to End Europe Combustion-Engine Sales by 2035: Mercury
- WG/ LN : John Wood Group Confirms Settlement of U.K., U.S., Brazil Probes

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 28th of June 2021

>>> Up
* Adecco Raised to Buy at HSBC; PT 73 Swiss francs
* Cemex ADRs Raised to Outperform at Bradesco BBI; PT $11
* Danone Raised to Overweight at JPMorgan; PT 75 euros
* Dr. Martens Raised to Buy at HSBC; PT 510 pence
* EDP Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 5.10 euros
* Entain PLC Raised to Add at AlphaValue
* Grafton PT Raised to 1,470 pence from 1,450 pence at Berenberg

>>> Down
* Endesa Cut to Underperform at RBC; PT 21.50 euros
* Iberdrola Cut to Underperform at RBC; PT 10 euros
* M&G Cut to Hold at HSBC; PT 250 pence
* St James's Place Cut to Hold at HSBC; PT 1,525 pence
* TeamViewer Cut to Neutral at Goldman; PT 37 euros
* Unibail Cut to Sell at SocGen; PT 67.30 euros

>>> Initiation
* EDP Renovaveis Rated New Buy at Citi; PT 21.40 euros
* SUSE Rated New Hold at Jefferies; PT 32 euros
* SUSE Rated New Buy at Goldman; PT 43 euros
* SUSE Rated New Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 35 euros
* SUSE Rated New Buy at Deutsche Bank; PT 40 euros
* SynAct Pharma Rated New Buy at Kempen & Co; PT 125 kronor

>>> Call
* European Renewable Utilities Attractive Post-Selloff, RBC Says
* BHP Likely to Approve Canada Potash Project in August, RBC Says

NY Times :Crypto’s Top V.C. Is Playing the Long Game

Crypto’s Top V.C. Is Playing the Long Game
Katie Haun, a co-chair of Andreessen Horowitz’s new $2.2 billion crypto fund, is betting that the blockchain will be as big as the internet.

A top crypto cop turned venture capitalist is now one of the most powerful women in Silicon Valley, with more than $2 billion at her fingertips.

Katie Haun, who created the first federal cryptocurrency task force as a prosecutor in the Justice Department, will co-chair a $2.2 billion crypto fund Andreessen Horowitz announced this week. She is a general partner at the venture capital fund and an independent director at the crypto exchange Coinbase. Chris Dixon, also a general partner at Andreessen, will be the fund’s other co-chair.

This is Andreessen’s third crypto fund. Haun joined the firm in 2018 to co-lead its first dedicated crypto fund, a $300 million commitment. She also co-led Andreessen’s second fund, which launched in 2020 with $515 million. With the latest blockbuster fund, she’ll have a significant hand in shaping the crypto space just as it seems to be going mainstream.

But it’s also a time of uncertainty for crypto. A Chinese regulatory crackdown on Bitcoin is battering prices and raising questions about the value and future regulatory landscape of crypto. She spoke to Andrew and Ephrat about the outlook for the burgeoning industry, the geopolitics of blockchain, risk, regulation and the fund’s focus. The interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

DealBook: Have we ever seen a government as large as China take the steps that it has taken?
Katie Haun: Actually, China has made a similar move before, in 2017. It outlawed trading of Bitcoin on exchanges that were based in China. The price of Bitcoin at that time had been hovering around $4,000, but on that news, it took a downward price turn. I’m surprised it didn’t happen sooner. Xi Jinping and China have made no secret of the fact that they consider crypto and blockchain a top-five national priority for China in the next decade. They’ve publicly stated this, and they are developing their own version of cryptocurrency, a digital renminbi. We know that they plan to export this, to tie trade to it, to incentivize people around the world, not just in China, to use it.

What happens if Bitcoin is shut down in China completely? Is that market for Bitcoin off the table?
The best analog for this is the Great Firewall of China, with the internet. Of course, this will be harder for China to just completely ban. They can do things like control on and off ramps, which they’ve done before. If you look back to that 2017 news, it actually shows the tremendous staying power of a decentralized, open system like Bitcoin.

Peter Thiel has argued that China would love to see bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies rise as a strategic effort to destabilize the U.S. dollar. Do you agree?
I don’t agree with that. I think China would like to keep control over its version of a digital yuan. And I think that they are developing what is effectively a closed permission system. Fundamentally they want control and surveillance over everything. I do agree that they would very much like to see the U.S. dollar upset as the global reserve currency. I just disagree in the way in which they would go about doing it. It’s far more likely we would see them export their version, by tying incentives to their digital currency to get individuals around the world to use it.

Back here in the U.S., do you think crypto will be regulated?
There’s this myth that crypto founders want the Wild West. They’re really kind of desperate for regulators to say what the rules are. It takes so much time, money and resources — specialty resources — to figure out how to navigate the morass of agencies ranging from the C.F.T.C. to Treasury, let alone the regulators in 50 different states.

S.E.C. Commissioner Hester Peirce has called for a regulatory sandbox, but I’m not sure that goes far enough because it only solves issues for projects that are clearly securities. What I would like to see is at a federal level in the U.S., a regulatory sandbox that has federal pre-emption. And in order to do that, you need legislation.

How would that work?
It would allow projects to launch with some rules, but it would provide an important test ground to see how they behave in the wild. And at the same time, it would serve a really important function to regulators and to people in the government by helping to train them on these new technologies. There is really no easy way to keep up. I’m full-time in the industry with experts all around, and I can’t keep up with the pace of this technology that’s changing so fast.

But how do you protect consumers — the broader public is clearly not being sandboxed or protected while this is taking place?
Consumer protection is really important. However, people want access to these products and services. And just saying, well, we’re not going to allow them in the U.S. is not the answer because anyone today with an internet connection and a VPN can pretty easily go access products and services that are offered in other countries. It’s incredibly hard, if not almost impossible, for the U.S. to police what’s happening overseas on offshore platforms.

As a former prosecutor, how do you think about crypto being used in so many ransomware attacks like the one on Colonial Pipeline? Why do criminals love Bitcoin so much?
Criminals are early adopters and in some ways they make great beta testers for new technology. They’re always looking for a way around the system. Frankly, law enforcement officials actually really like when payment is made in Bitcoin as opposed to fiat. I think it’s funny because as a former prosecutor, I take this for granted. There’s a real false sense of security where wires are used or traditional financial services are used. People think, “Oh, we know everything about that. So we’ll just go subpoena. The bank will give us these records and we’ll just go get the money.” That is just so far from the reality of the situation.

So you don’t believe that these ransomware attacks are a function of crypto?
I think you are asking if crypto is the cause of ransomware, and it’s absolutely not. I prosecuted many of the Justice Department’s largest online money laundering schemes. In fiat systems, 99.9 percent of money laundering claims succeed. Actually, the thing that really stands out about the ransomware attacks — the Colonial Pipeline is a great example of this. It is unprecedented that the Justice Department would be able to recover the proceeds from international criminal activity so quickly. That timeline is usually years, if ever.

When you think about risks in crypto, how much leverage do you think is in the crypto system?
Just like in traditional financial services, of course, there’s leverage, I’m not going to deny that. But people can get a lot more leverage with platforms overseas. So I think it’s in U.S. regulators and consumers’ interests to foster responsible innovation here in this country. So don’t say you can’t have any leverage, but let’s talk about what limits are — what are some good rules of the road that we could agree on.

One of the only things that unites Congress lately is China, and I think U.S. policymakers and lawmakers are starting to realize that China and other countries are moving forward, recognizing that crypto and blockchain is a real priority, and that we are behind, unlike in the internet, where Darpa and the U.S. government had a hand in helping create it.

What do you make of the memeification of crypto? When you see Elon Musk tweeting about Dogecoin, do you say this is great or terrible?
Somewhere in between. There’s something fundamental going on right now with the internet and culture, and I think crypto is at the epicenter. It’s easy to dismiss things as games or memes. I myself was kind of guilty of that a few years ago. And, you know, I’ve been proven wrong a couple of times. So one of the things I’ve tried to learn is to keep an open mind.

You’ve raised two billion dollars for this crypto fund amid this almost euphoria over the past couple of months around crypto and the future of crypto, NFTs, the price of Bitcoin going to 60-plus thousand dollars. This week a lot of the air has come out. Can you contextualize the fund and fund-raising in this environment?
We started talking about raising this third fund long before what you just described, the euphoria. We’re making seven- to 10-year bets.

One great category we’re interested in is infrastructure and scalability — UX, picks and shovels, you know, to enable more mainstream consumers to be able to use crypto products and services. Look for us to double down on that area.

The second category is NFTs and gaming. A lot of people that I talk to about NFTs think, “oh, yeah, digital art.” I think it’s so much more than just about art. It’s about much more than gaming, it’s about much more than goods. It’s about this new business model for creators and bringing entirely new audiences to crypto, entirely new types like creators, sports fans and media types.

Then the third category is DeFi or decentralized finance.

This fund is magnitudes larger than funds one and two. What does that say about where we are?
It’s about four times larger than our last fund. We were oversubscribed. We could have quite easily raised a lot larger fund without any issue at all from our existing limited partners, without even going to new limited partners. But we didn’t want to raise a larger fund, just for the sake of a bigger number. I almost think about it as raising funds for the internet a couple of decades ago. Now we don’t think anything of it — we have separate funds for consumer, for infrastructure, for enterprise, for things like that, for gaming. With crypto, we think that its potential for growth is as big as the potential for the internet.