FT : WPP’s Cindy Rose prepares radical reset in turnaround ‘mission’

WPP’s Cindy Rose prepares radical reset in turnaround ‘mission’
Advertising group’s new CEO plans restructuring and says traditional agency model is from a ‘bygone era’

WPP’s new chief executive Cindy Rose is working on a restructuring of the struggling British advertising group, as she vowed that it was her “mission” to secure its long-term future in an industry being rapidly reshaped by artificial intelligence.

In her first interview since taking over in September, Rose said she wants to dramatically simplify the London-listed group’s operations to reflect that the traditional advertising agency network model was from “a bygone era”.

The plans, which Rose said will help transform WPP from “being a holding company to an operating company”, will be unveiled fully next month.

Rose, 60, took charge of a company reeling from a succession of client losses and profit warnings, leading to a drop in WPP’s shares of about 60 per cent over the past year. The group is now valued at just £3.7bn, having been worth as much as £24bn less than a decade ago, and dropped out of the FTSE 100 this month for the first time in close to 30 years.

“You have to understand [that] this is more than just a new job for me. This is a mission,” Rose said, adding that she intends to secure the next 40 years of a “great British company that deserves to be successful”.

The new chief executive declined to comment on potential job losses but conceded she is “trying to find operational efficiencies.”

Rose, who previously led Microsoft’s operations in Europe, took WPP’s top job from long-term boss Mark Read after serving on the group’s board as a non executive director since 2019. During an interview at WPP’s new London offices, on the south bank of the river Thames, Rose vowed to “simplify” the group’s operating model.

“We’ve got to be able to provide integrated services to our clients, because that’s what they tell us they want,” she said. “[Clients] want the best of WPP, wherever that talent sits. They don’t want to be constrained by agency constructs. That might mean there’s a social influencer expert there and a commerce expert there and a data expert there.”

More than half of client pitches are for integrated services across WPP’s agencies.


Rose, a dual US/UK national who splits her time between London and New York, has concentrated on WPP’s clients in her first few months. “I see clients every single day. I’m in pitches, I’m doing meet and greets, I’m in quarterly business reviews.”

In October WPP projected that adjusted like-for-like revenues will decline by between 5.5 and 6 per cent for the current year, prompting Rose to say WPP’s performance had not been acceptable. She said this had since been taken as “a call to action” internally.

“Clients are already noticing the difference, and it’s showing up in the business that we’re winning,” she said.

In her first 100 days — “not that I’m counting” — Rose said WPP has won work for Mastercard, Henkel, Reckitt Benckiser, PwC and Goldman Sachs. It won more than $1.5bn in billings in November, and is set to land a major UK government contract in January.

Rose acknowledged that WPP’s major shareholders are “obviously frustrated . . . all I can do is show up and listen and show humility.” Earlier this month WPP raised €1bn in an oversubscribed bond issue, seen by insiders as a vote of confidence from the City.

The decline in WPP’s share price has been partly driven by concerns over the impact of AI tools — which are able to produce ads cheaper, faster and at a huge scale.

Rose countered that WPP would use the technology to its advantage, citing WPP Open, its AI powered marketing platform that turns simple prompts into ads in minutes, as a key source of differentiation.

The platform — which also helps WPP plan, place and measure the effectiveness of ads — allows the group to “break down the silos between creative production and media, all powered by a common data model,” Rose said. She believes there is a “misperception in the market that we’re lagging behind [in the use of AI tools].”

WPP’s boss acknowledged that the adoption of AI tools will lead to questions over the viability of some roles internally but rejected the idea that the technology is “an existential threat” for the industry.

“I think AI is a once in a generation opportunity,” she said. “AI automates the ordinary and massively elevates the extraordinary. And to do extraordinary creative work, you need humans.”

WPP is not the only advertising holding company reorganising itself. Last month, Omnicom killed off several historic agency brands as part of its merger with IPG. Rose said though that she is supportive of WPP having multiple agencies despite her push to simply its structure.

Even so, she said the jobs in WPP were changing. It has more than 12,000 “creatives” but almost as many — nearly 10,000 — software engineers, developers, AI practitioners and data scientists. 

The rapid growth in the use of AI to make ads threatens to upend the concept of the “billable hour”, which the industry has long relied upon in charging for its work. 

Rose admits AI “will put downward pressure on pricing,” adding that WPP has to convince clients it’s worth them reinvesting the money they save into its other services, which can “set them apart from their competitors.”

“If we do our jobs well — and we will — AI will be value-accretive to WPP,” she said. “It’s not going to flip overnight, but we’ll go from being a ‘time and materials’ based business to more of a tech fees and outcome based one.”

“The good news about all of this [disruption is that] it’s all within our control,” Rose added. “It’s all about execution. We’re fixing it now.” 

FT : Japan raises interest rates to highest level in 30 years

Japan raises interest rates to highest level in 30 years
Yields on 10-year government bonds exceed 2% for first time since 2006 after central bank’s fourth rate increase

The Bank of Japan has raised short-term interest rates to their highest level in 30 years and kept the door open to further increases, as rising prices transform an economy that spent decades mired in deflation.

The BoJ said on Friday it was raising its policy rate by 0.25 percentage points to “around 0.75 per cent”.

The rate increase, a unanimous decision by the bank’s Policy Board, was the fourth under governor Kazuo Ueda, continuing a “normalisation” process he launched last year.

The rate rise was widely anticipated after what traders said was unusually clear messaging ahead of the decision. A less telegraphed rate increase in July 2024 caused severe market ructions.

Yields on 10-year JGBs climbed 0.035 percentage points to exceed 2 per cent for the first time since 2006, edging closer to their highest level since the 1990s. Bond yields move inversely to prices.

Anticipation of the BoJ’s move and investor concerns that Japan’s fiscal position will be stretched by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s spending plans have driven JGB yields to multiyear highs in recent weeks.

The yen weakened 0.3 per cent against the dollar to ¥156.08 immediately following the BoJ’s announcement before strengthening to ¥155.85.

“There was some disappointment in the market that the BoJ’s statement was not more hawkish, but the central bank does seem to have handled this very smoothly this time,” said Shoki Omori, chief desk strategist at Mizuho. “I think that the risk, though, is that this [rate increase] will not significantly move the yen higher.”


The BoJ statement noted that labour conditions in Japan, where the population is shrinking, continued to be tight, while corporate profits were expected to remain strong despite the impact of tariff policies.

The central bank said companies were “highly likely” to keep raising wages next year and that prices would continue to rise moderately.

Those conditions justified the adjustment of monetary policy, it said, a move that some economists judged to be at odds with Takaichi’s sweeping economic stimulus plans.

The BoJ observed that “real interest rates are expected to remain significantly negative after the change in the policy interest rate, and accommodative financial conditions will continue to firmly support economic activity”.

It added that because real interest rates were low, if the economy performed in line with expectations, it would continue to raise the policy rate and adjust the degree of monetary accommodation.

Traders said markets would look for greater clarity on interest rate rises in 2026 during Ueda’s press conference later on Friday.

Recommended

Bank of Japan
Bank of Japan governor says economy has weathered Donald Trump’s tariffs

Headline consumer price inflation has been above the BoJ’s target level of 2 per cent for more than three years, driven by the yen’s relative weakness and Japan’s dependence on imports of food and energy.

Shortly before the BoJ’s decision was announced, official data showed consumer prices excluding fresh food rose 3 per cent in November from a year earlier.

Kei Fujimoto, senior economist at SuMi Trust, said: “The BoJ’s stance towards rate hikes reflects the fact that inflation is becoming entrenched. Factors such as the pass-through of import prices, raw material costs and labour expenses are contributing to sustained inflation.”

>>> US After Hours Summary: NKE -9.4% lower on earnings; FDX +2.1% higher on ear

After Hours Summary: NKE -9.4% lower on earnings; FDX +2.1% higher on earnings; LNKB +6.5% higher on merger with BHRB; WSJ reports that OpenAI financing round may push valuation toward $830 bln

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: AVO +5.1% (also Founder & CEO Steve Barnard to become Exec Chairman; COO to become new CEO), NNE +2.5%, FDX +2.1%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: WYFI +13.6% (announces 40 MW colocation agreement), LNKB +6.5% (BHRB and LNKB to merge), TAC +2% (Sheerness Unit 1 will be temporarily mothballed), WULF +1.4% (financing for previously disclosed 168 MW computing joint venture), IVR +1.1% (increases dividend; also plans to switch to monthly dividends in Jan), HTFL +0.8% (announces publication of 2 new scientific statements), CRWV +0.8% (joins DoE's Genesis Mission to advance US research and innovation), BBAI +0.5% (strategic partnership with C Speed), FRST +0.4% (approves stock repurchase program for up to 750,000 shares), ETHZ +0.3% (stock offering by selling shareholders), DGNX +0.2% (to acquire The Remedy Project)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: NKE -9.4%, SCHL -1.3% (also authorizes new $150 mln share repurchase program), BB -0.2%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: CGTX -1.3% (files for $300 mln mixed shelf offering; also enters sales agreement up to $75 mln of stock), FTI -0.3% (awarded a substantial contract by Eni S.p.A), META -0.3% (developing a new image and video-focused AI model, according to WSJ), LINE -0.1% (files mixed securities shelf offering)

>>> US Close Dow +0.14% S&P +0.79% Nasdaq +1.38% Russell +0.62%

Closing Market Summary: Tech leadership returns as Micron and CPI data boost market
The S&P 500 (+0.8%), Nasdaq Composite (+1.4%), and DJIA (+0.1%) finished higher across the board as Micron's (MU 248.55, +23.03, +10.21%) earnings report gave the AI trade a nice lift, while the broader market was boosted by a cooler-than-expected November CPI report.

The report was atypical, lacking month-over-month data because of missing October figures, but year-over-year inflation showed clear improvement, with CPI slowing to 2.7% from 3.0% and core CPI easing to 2.6% from 3.0%.

Ultimately it proved to be another pre-market boost for a market that was already trending up after a stellar beat-and-raise earnings report from Micron. The company shattered estimates for both revenue and earnings while providing a Q2 outlook that far exceeded market expectations.

Chipmakers unsurprisingly rallied on the report, with the PHLX Semiconductor Index gaining 2.5%.
Additionally, the blowout results provided a significant lift to peer memory and storage stocks, including Sandisk (SNDK 219.46, +12.63, +6.11%), Seagate Tech (STX 292.00, +14.35, +5.17%), and Western Digital (WDC 175.01, +8.75, +5.26%).

The information technology sector (+1.4%) finished with one of the widest gains as a result.
The consumer discretionary sector (+1.8%) nabbed the top spot on the leaderboard, supported by solid leadership in its mega-cap components Tesla (TSLA 483.37, +16.11, +3.45%) and Amazon (AMZN 226.76, +5.49, +2.48%).
Elsewhere in the sector, lululemon athletica (LULU 215.11, +7.24, +3.48%) traded higher after The Wall Street Journal reported that Elliot Investment Management has built a $1 billion stake in the company, and Starbucks (SBUX 89.42, +4.21, +4.94%) notched the widest gain in the sector as the company's "Back to Starbucks" plan is starting to yield results.

The communication services sector (+1.5%) also benefitted from strength in the market's largest names. The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (+1.3%) captured a nice gain, helping the market-weighted S&P 500 (+0.8%) outperform the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (+0.2%).

That margin was closer throughout most of the day, though some late-session selling activity saw five S&P 500 sectors close lower. It is worth noting that all five sectors that closed lower today finished at or above their baselines in yesterday's action, highlighting the recent back-and-forth trend seen in the market.

Additionally, only the energy sector (-1.4%) closed with a loss wider than 0.7%.

Outside of the S&P 500, the Russell 2000 (+0.6%) and S&P Mid Cap 400 (+0.5%) followed the seesaw trend, notching solid gains after retreating yesterday.

While the AI trade certainly showed signs of rejuvenation today, the broader trend is still reflective of some choppy action. The information technology sector (+1.4%), the PHLX Semiconductor Index (+2.5%), and the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (+1.3%) all outperformed today, but recent weakness still seats them week-to-date and month-to-date losses.

Additionally, CNBC reported that, according to Goldman, more than $7.1 trillion in notional options exposure is scheduled to expire this Friday, including about $5 trillion linked to the S&P 500, which could make for a volatile end to this week's action.

Still, the S&P 500 notched a technical victory by reclaiming its 50-day moving average (6,765.55), and the major averages finished higher across the board, placing today's session firmly in the win column.

U.S. Treasuries enjoyed a swift recovery from their shallow midweek dip, with the belly leading Thursday's advance. The 2-year note yield settled down three basis points to 3.46%, and the 10-year note yield settled down four basis points to 4.12%.

  • Nasdaq Composite: +19.1% YTD
  • S&P 500: +15.2% YTD
  • DJIA: +12.7% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +12.5% YTD
  • S&P Mid Cap 400: +6.4% YTD

Reviewing today's data:
  • Total CPI for the two-month period from September to November was up 0.2% ( consensus: 0.3%), while core CPI, which excludes food and energy, was also up 0.2% for the two-month period (consensus: 0.3%). The October data were not available due to the government shutdown. On a year-over-year basis, total CPI increased 2.7% versus a prior 3.0%, and core CPI was up 2.6% versus a prior 3.0%.
    • The key takeaway from the report is twofold: first, it is a messy report because of the lack of October data, but secondly and more to the point today, the disinflation in the year-over-year readings is a welcome sight for policymakers and market participants.
  • Initial jobless claims for the week ending December 13 decreased by 13,000 to 224,000 (consensus: 229,000). Continuing jobless claims for the week ending December 6 increased by 67,000 to 1.897 million.
    • The key takeaway from the report is its low firing-low hiring dynamic, evidenced by the decrease in initial claims and the increase in continuing claims. That is a delicate balance that helps validate the Fed's willingness to walk the line with a rate cut at its December meeting, particularly when paired with the disinflation seen in the November CPI report.
  • The Philadelphia Fed Index dropped to -10.2 in December (consensus: 2.9) from -1.7 in November. The headline reading, though, was also accompanied by a welcome 13-point drop in the prices paid index to 43.6, which is the lowest reading since June.

WSJ : Meta Developing New AI Image and Video Model Code-Named ‘Mango’

Meta Developing New AI Image and Video Model Code-Named ‘Mango’
Alexandr Wang, the company’s AI chief, said the new model will debut soon, along with a large language model dubbed Avocado

Meta Platforms META 2.30%increase; green up pointing triangle is developing a new image and video-focused AI model code-named Mango alongside the company’s next text-based large language model.

Meta’s META 2.30%increase; green up pointing triangle chief AI officer Alexandr Wang talked about the artificial intelligence models in an internal company Q&A on Thursday with Chris Cox, Meta’s chief product officer, according to people who heard the remarks. The models are expected to be released in the first half of 2026.

Wang also said one of the focuses for the new text model, code-named Avocado, is making it better at coding, and that the company is in the early stages of exploring developing so-called world models, AI that learns about its environment by taking in visual information.

TechCrunch : ChatGPT’s mobile app hits new milestone of $3B in consumer spending

ChatGPT’s mobile app hits new milestone of $3B in consumer spending

ChatGPT has hit a new milestone of $3 billion in worldwide consumer spending on mobile as of this week, according to estimates from app intelligence provider Appfigures. This figure represents the total spending on iOS and Android devices since the app’s launch in May 2023, when it first arrived, then only on iOS.


What’s notable is that the bulk of that spending took place this year. Worldwide, consumers spent an estimated $2.48 billion in the ChatGPT mobile app in 2025, representing a 408% year-over-year increase from the $487 million spent in 2024. In 2023, the app’s first year of availability, it earned $42.9 million, before growing 1,036% to reach the 2024 figure.


These numbers represent a sharp rise in consumer adoption, compared with other popular apps. For instance, it took ChatGPT 31 months to reach $3 billion in consumer spending, but the top earner, TikTok, took 58 months to do so, Appfigures told TechCrunch.

ChatGPT also reached the milestone faster than top streaming apps like Disney+ and HBO Max, which hit the $3 billion figure in 42 months and 46 months, respectively.


xAI’s Grok, however, is seeing a similar revenue trajectory to ChatGPT, compared with other AI rivals.

Grok was released in late 2023 to X Premium Plus subscribers before becoming more broadly available last year. But if you compare the pace of consumer spending across AI apps, Grok came the closest to matching ChatGPT’s cumulative revenue at the same point, once it began monetizing. (You can see this on the chart below, which plots the AI apps’ spending aligned to when each app began monetizing.)


While the $3 billion in spending represents a significant uptake by consumers, it’s not the only way to measure AI app adoption or potential long-term revenue.

ChatGPT’s mobile customers are buying paid subscriptions, like the $20 per month ChatGPT Plus or the $200 per month ChatGPT Pro for advanced users. But AI apps can generate revenue in other ways, including through developer offerings and, perhaps soon for ChatGPT, ads. In addition, ChatGPT on Wednesday launched its own app store of sorts, which the company suggests will be monetized in some way in the future, its blog post noted.

Google, meanwhile, is exploring the potential to transition its healthy search ads business to AI-powered search, placing ads in AI Mode, AI Overviews, AI shopping, and an increasingly AI-powered Discover page, among other things.

Anthropic is aiming at the business market and is reportedly on track for $70 billion in revenue by 2028.

Footwear News : There’s No Demand Issue at Birkenstock, but It Does Have a Tempo

There’s No Demand Issue at Birkenstock, but It Does Have a Temporary Production Problem
Birkenstock's fiscal '26 financial targets are limited somewhat by foreign exchange headwinds and a temporary production capacity issue.

Birkenstock Holding Plc shareholders were disappointed with the brand’s fiscal 2026 targets, which were lower than 2025 results due to a combination of tariff headwinds, foreign exchange, and the brand’s own production capabilities.

Birkenstock CEO Oliver Reichert said the company posted “very strong fiscal 2025 results,” but investors — for better or worse — tend to focus just on future guidance.

For the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2026, the company said it expects revenue at between 2.30 billion euros to 2.35 billion euros, with adjusted earnings per share at between 1.90 euros to 2.05 euros.

The brand’s revenue target is lower than Wall Street’s projection of 2.39 billion euros. And its revenue growth rate in constant currency is about 13 to 15 percent. That represents a deceleration of the 18 percent growth in fiscal 2025, according to William Blair analyst Sharon Zackfia. She expects sales over the next few years to be bolstered by ramping production, DTC expansion, and white-space categories and geographies that could see growth, as well as a favorable product mix on premiumization and an expanded closed-toe assortment.

Shareholders responded by sending shares of Birkenstock down 8.6 percent, or $4.00, to $42.40 in mid-afternoon trading on the Big Board Thursday.

“These are unusual times,” Reichert told investors during a conference call after posting the fourth-quarter report. He said the company generated significant cash flow and invested over 150 million euros into its production capacity against the backdrop of “global tariff and international trade, a war in the Ukraine and energy crisis and a significant decline in the U.S. dollar.” The CEO also noted that Birkenstock’s healthy brand momentum continued in the fourth quarter, and that the brand is winning in both B2B and B2C, gaining shelf space and taking share.

He also noted a strong back-to-school season with retail sales “at our top 10 partners increasing over 20 percent year-over-year,” adding that the momentum is expected to continue through the holiday season, with over 90 percent of the growth in B2B from within existing doors. “Full price realization, the ultimate indicator for brand health and demand remains over 90 percent,” Reichert said.

While he noted that strong wholesale growth is driven by the younger demographic, that trend also “requires us to produce more pairs in a situation where we are already capacity constrained.” The CEO explained that the strongest demand is for Birkenstock’s premium styles, which require even more production units. “The combination of more wholesale and more premium execution is creating additional pressure on our vertically integrated supply chain,” he said. “We need to manage growth in our production responsibly. This is why we are steering towards a mid-teens pace of growth for fiscal ’26.”

There was nothing in Reichert’s remarks that suggested a slowdown in consumer demand. If anything, the constraints to growth were more limited to the brand’s production capacity. But the brand does have to deal with tough foreign exchange headwinds, as well as incremental U.S. tariffs, and that accounts for some of the pullback in guidance.

As for tariffs, the company said in May when it reported second-quarter results that it had taken actions to mitigate the tariff impacts and that there were still multiple levers it could pull, helped by the fact that the German brand is vertically integrated and had at its disposal efficiencies in production, vendor negotiations and the ability to allocate products between different regions.


Company executives said Thursday Birkenstock was able to offset most of the 2025 tariff impact through targeted price increases, including one implemented in July.

The one difference between 2026 and 2025 is that this past year benefited from shipments prior to the increase in tariffs. That means 2026 will see some impact from tariffs in the cost of goods sold, which is expected to result in a decline in margins.

Price reviews are done each season, with adjustments on a store-by-store basis. Over the longer term, growth in the brand’s Asia-Pacific business is expected to reduce its exposure to the U.S. dollar and to U.S. tariff impact. And while price increases — which are dollar neutral but not margin neutral — will offset much of the incremental tariff impact, Birkenstock executives gave the impression that higher prices would not rise to the level where they would capture the same margin rate as in 2025.

“We believe the guidance level sets expectations for the year, and the top-line outlook reflects continued strength in underlying demand for the brand against an uncertain macro outlook,” Telsey Advisory Group’s chief investment office Dana Telsey said. “As consumers remain more intentional with their purchases, we see Birkenstock as a brand that can continue to win in the marketplace through its competitive advantage of a high-end lifestyle positioning. As such, we maintain our Outperform rating.”

Back in August when the firm posted third-quarter results, Reichert said the shift to in-person shopping amplifies the brand and favors its B2B channel over DTC. He reiterated that during Thursday’s fourth-quarter call.

That’s one reason why the brand also plans to open about 40 new company-owned retail stores globally in fiscal 2026, about 10 more than the doors it’s opened this year. It ended the year with 97 doors, with Reichert noting that the new stores “are performing ahead of our expectations in terms of productivity and return of CapEx,” adding that the brand is “on track” to reach its 150-store target ahead of schedule. Meanwhile, the brand just opened its seventh company-owned retail store in the U.S. in Boston, in the city’s Back Bay neighborhood.

For the fourth quarter ended Sept. 30, the brand reported a 78.9 percent gain in profits to 93.9 million euros, or 0.51 euros a diluted share, from 52.5 million euros or 0.28 euros. Revenue rose 15.5 percent to 526.3 million euros from 455.8 million euros.

Wall Street was expecting adjusted diluted earnings per share of 0.25 euros on revenue of $407.09 million.

For the year, profits rose 81.8 percent to 348.3 million euros, or 1.87 euros a diluted share, from 191.6 million euros, or 1.02 euros. Revenue rose 16.2 percent to nearly 2.1 billion euros from 1.80 billion euros.

Electrek : Elon Musk’s SpaceX bought tens of millions worth of Cybertrucks Tesla

Elon Musk’s SpaceX bought tens of millions worth of Cybertrucks Tesla can’t sell

As demand for the Cybertruck can’t reach more than about 10% of Tesla’s planned production capacity, Elon Musk used his privately owned company to try to boost demand.

We now learn that SpaceX has bought tens of millions of dollars’ worth of Cybertrucks – potentially over a hundred million.

Elon Musk said that he expects Tesla to sell as many as 500,000 Cybertrucks per year.

Tesla actually planned to produce up to 250,000 Cybertrucks annually at the Gigafactory Texas. It never came even close to that.

The automaker is extremely opaque about its sales data, bundling Model S, Model X, and Cybertruck sales together.

However, based on registration data and historical split of Model S/X sales, we can estimate that Tesla is having issues selling even 20,000 Cybertrucks per year – less than 10% of its planned capacity.

By definition, the Cybertruck is a commercial flop.

Tesla boasted over 1 million reservations for the vehicle ahead of production, but it is estimated to have converted only about 60,000 of those reservations into orders since production began more than 2 years ago.

There are many reasons for this, but it is primarily because the Cybertruck costs much more than initially announced at the unveiling in 2019 and has less range and fewer cool features than the prototype.

SpaceX to the rescue
Earlier this year, we reported that Tesla started delivering truckloads of Cybertrucks to SpaceX and xAI, Elon Musk’s privately owned companies.

Now, a source familiar with the matter told Electrek that SpaceX bought over 1,000 Cybertrucks from Tesla and that it could ramp up to about 2,000 over time.

Hundreds of Cybertrucks can currently be seen parked in SpaceX’s lots in Southern Texas:

With a base price of $80,000, it would represent between $80 million and $160 million in sales.

It would be a significant help to Tesla’s performance in the fourth quarter, as the automaker is suffering from EV incentives ending in the US at the end of the third quarter, which remains Tesla’s most important market.

Electrek’s Take
SpaceX has been helping out Elon’s other companies quite a bit lately. It has reportedly committed to invest $2 billion into xAI, which is burning cash at an insane rate. Now, they are buying tens of millions to over a hundred million worth of Cybertruck, which are sitting in Tesla’s inventory, making its 4th quarter look even worse than it already is.

Can’t blame him here. This is legal. Although SpaceX investors might have concerns about how smart a purchase this is and what the utilization rate of those trucks looks like.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

FT : The AI adoption race in the workplace is on

The AI adoption race in the workplace is on
Sector companies are seeking to show that time saved on one-off tasks can translate into real-world business value

A financial analyst turns to a chatbot to study the possible risks and returns from an investment programme. A job that would have taken 50 minutes is completed in 10.

That is one of the real-world cases that AI company Anthropic claimed to find recently when it asked its Claude chatbot to analyse how it was being used at work. But showing how one-off tasks like this translate into real-world business value for employers is not so simple.

This is set to become one of the main fronts in the battle between leading AI companies in 2026. OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said recently that his company was shifting its focus to enterprise customers as it looks to boost its revenues — a market where Anthropic is currently ahead.

Yet even if people are starting to take to generative AI at work, most companies aren’t yet able to measure whether the technology makes individual workers more effective in their jobs, let alone trace any productivity gains at the level of the company as a whole.

Looking for the effects of a new technology like AI in the broader economy is even harder. IT’s impact on overall labour productivity has been famously difficult to identify from the official data. The impact of digital technologies did not show up in US economic data for years, until productivity growth started to rise steadily after the late-1990s. By the beginning of this decade, though, growth had fallen back to its earlier level, at around 1.5 per cent a year.

The encouraging news for the AI companies and their investors is that many people are starting to find uses for generative AI in their working lives. Summarising a long report, drafting a marketing presentation and analysing financial data are the kinds of things workers have tried for the first time this year. If and when any of these use cases take hold widely, the effects in terms of AI model usage could be significant.

So far, generative AI has one “killer app” at work, in the form of the coding assistants used by software developers. Its effects have been explosive. In May this year, 11 per cent of all the tokens generated by large language models were related to coding, according to a study of AI model usage by OpenRouter. By November, that proportion had soared to around 50 per cent.

Workers themselves certainly believe AI is starting to make them more effective. Earlier this month, OpenAI said workers it surveyed found AI saved them 40-60 minutes a day. That is up from the 2.2 hours a week that workers believed they were saving in a similar study conducted by the St Louis Fed a year ago.

Self-reporting like this is highly subjective, which makes Anthropic’s study of real-world tasks potentially more revealing. Based on 100,000 work-related conversations, Claude estimated it was slicing 65 minutes off the 85 minutes an average task would have taken.

Yet demonstrating virtuosity on individual tasks doesn’t translate directly into business advantage for customers, as Anthropic is the first to admit. The figures don’t show, for instance, how much extra work goes into checking the output from chatbots, or how overall quality affects the results.

Also, a single job may lead to more than one chat session. The ease and speed of getting a result out of a chatbot might lead workers to produce many more reports or emails, leading to a cascade of unproductive “workslop”. Nor can Claude tell what workers do with any time the technology has managed to save them.

Another drawback is that the task-based analyses that lie at the heart of most studies of technology’s impact on productivity fail to capture the reality of working life. For most people, work doesn’t fall into discreet, self-contained segments. Looking at single tasks in isolation, as Anthropic admits, doesn’t capture the tacit knowledge and personal relationships that affect how work is done, or the connections between different tasks.

That appeared to explain the counter-intuitive results of one study this year, which found that a group of experienced developers took 19 per cent longer to complete a task when they used an AI coding tool.

The full benefits of generative AI will only become apparent when companies have redesigned entire work processes to make best use of the technology, and when they have overcome the cultural barriers that always stand in the way of this kind of change. But with workers starting to take to experiment with AI, the race is on.