>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • Porsche SE (PAH3 TH) +5.5%
    • VW Keeps Porsche IPO on the Table Amid Market Volatility
  • VW (VOW3 TH) +3.3%
  • Zalando (ZAL TH) +2.7%
  • Infineon (IFX TH) +2.6%
  • Fresenius SE (FRE TH) +2.6%
  • BASF (BAS TH) +1%
    • BASF Sees 2022 Adjusted Ebit EU6.6B to EU7.2B, Est. EU7.03B
  • E.On (EOAN TH) +0.9%
  • RWE (RWE TH) +0.8%
    • European Energy Firms Rush to Buy Russian Gas After Attack
  • Puma (PUM TH) +0.7%
  • Linde (LIN TH) +0.6%
MDAX:
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) +4.9%
  • Lufthansa (LHA TH) +3.5%
    • Ukraine War Upends Flights, Stokes Fears for Staff, Planes
  • Thyssenkrupp (TKA TH) +3.2%
    • IPO Market Grinds to a Halt Amid Ukraine Invasion Volatility
  • Daimler Truck (DTG TH) +2.9%
  • Telefonica Deutschland (O2D TH) +2.8%
  • Uniper (UN01 TH) +1.4%
    • Russia Sanctions for Ukraine War Puts Focus on Related Shares
  • K+S (SDF TH) +1.3%
  • ProSieben (PSM TH) +1.2%
  • Hugo Boss (BOSS TH) +1.2%
  • Evotec SE (EVT TH) +1%
SDAX:
  • Traton (8TRA TH) +4.8%
  • GFT (GFT TH) +4.4%
  • SMA Solar (S92 TH) +3.9%
  • DWS (DWS TH) +3.5%
  • Deutsche PBB (PBB TH) +3%
  • Hamborner REIT (HABA TH) +0.5%
  • Nordex (NDX1 TH) +0.4%
  • flatexDEGIRO (FTK TH) +0.3%
  • Metro (B4B TH) +0.3%
    • Russia Sanctions for Ukraine War Puts Focus on Related Shares
  • Fielmann (FIE TH) -0.5%

WSJ : Citadel Is Further Paring Back $2 Billion Melvin Investment

Citadel Is Further Paring Back $2 Billion Melvin Investment
Citadel also redeemed half its investment in the hedge fund in 2021

Citadel LLC is further paring back its $2 billion investment in Melvin Capital Management after the hedge fund stumbled in its effort to recover from a near collapse triggered by surges in GameStop Corp. and other “meme stocks” early last year.

Citadel in late January asked to redeem half the money the firm and its partners have left in Melvin’s hedge fund, after originally halving their investment late last year, as Melvin racked up double-digit losses for the second January in a row, people familiar with the matter said. The latest redemption request would be paid out at the end of March, the people said.

Citadel and its partners invested $2 billion in January 2021, alongside a $750 million influx from Steven A. Cohen’s Point72 Asset Management, in exchange for a share of Melvin’s fees over the next three years. The rare intra-month investment, made as the $12.5 billion hedge fund was suffering mounting losses from the ferocious meme-stock rally, enabled Melvin to reduce its leverage and avoid being a forced seller.

The Wall Street Journal reported in August that Citadel and its partners planned to redeem roughly $500 million from Melvin. Citadel, which manages about $45 billion, ultimately wound up withdrawing more, halving its investment, after Melvin raised money from other investors.

Citadel founder Ken Griffin wasn’t happy about Melvin’s losses this January, some of the people said. It is possible Citadel would have redeemed even if Melvin had performed better; Citadel rarely maintains significant investments with outside managers and is known for being opportunistic.

A person familiar with Citadel said it hadn’t determined what future redemptions, if any, it would make. Melvin executives expected Citadel’s investment to decrease over time and consider the firm a good partner, a person familiar with the matter said.

Founded by Gabe Plotkin, a former star portfolio manager for Mr. Cohen, Melvin was one of the top hedge funds on Wall Street when it lost about $6.8 billion—more than half its assets—in January 2021 as individual investors banded together to target the firm and bets it had made against GameStop and other companies. Strategy changes helped the fund claw back some of those losses in the remainder of last year, but Melvin lost 15% this January as technology and other fast-growing companies it had bet on sold off.

It couldn’t be learned how the fund has fared in February.

Individual wagers that hurt the fund include a bet against videogame giant Activision Blizzard Inc., which Microsoft Corp. agreed to acquire in January in a roughly $75 billion deal, people familiar with Melvin said.

In a sign of the reputation Mr. Plotkin had earned before the firm’s recent travails, Melvin received few redemption requests last year and even took in more than $2.5 billion through several fund raises—not counting the investments by Citadel and Point72.

Client sentiment toward Melvin has been mixed in recent weeks. Some investors have said Melvin’s most recent losses were understandable given the hit funds employing similar strategies suffered. Others have asked whether the size of Melvin’s short book is large enough and whether the firm is too big and should return some money to clients. Melvin started 2022 with $11.7 billion.

Some investors also said they were unhappy Mr. Plotkin is launching a lower-fee, long-only fund, which was earlier reported by Reuters. Several said Mr. Plotkin should focus first on making back money for clients who suffered losses. A person familiar with Melvin said the new fund replicates the long positions in Melvin’s main fund and won’t distract Mr. Plotkin and his team.

Point72 hasn’t redeemed any of its recent investment, people familiar with the matter said. Point72 benefited from Mr. Plotkin’s performance before last year, having been a Day-1 investor via its predecessor firm, SAC Capital Advisors, when Melvin launched in 2014. Point72 had more than $1 billion invested in Melvin as of 2019. People familiar with Point72 also said the firm has more history investing with outside managers.

WSJ : What Makes Bored Ape NFTs So Desirable?

What Makes Bored Ape NFTs So Desirable?
Purchased by celebrities from Justin Bieber to Gwyneth Paltrow, and exciting cryptocurrency enthusiasts, these digital avatars promise a vaunted place in the metaverse and IP potential.

enthusiasts, these digital avatars promise a vaunted place in the metaverse and IP potential.


Jimmy Fallon’s ape sports a sailor’s hat, a striped shirt and heart-shaped sunglasses.


On The Tonight Show in late January, Jimmy Fallon held up a portrait of a cartoon ape wearing a sailor’s hat, a striped shirt and heart-shaped sunglasses. “This is my ape,” he said, as his guest, Paris Hilton, gave it her approval. She also had an ape, which Fallon had earlier shown the audience, a red-furred version wearing sunglasses and an S&M cap. “We’re part of the same community,” Fallon said. “We’re both apes.”
This odd moment between Hilton and Fallon hurtled Bored Ape Yacht Club, a collection of NFTs depicting apes, into the spotlight. Other celebrities were showing off theirs too: In January, Justin Bieber posted a photo on Instagram of his Bored Ape #3001, sometimes called Lonely Bored Ape, which relates to his song “Lonely.” (This ape’s eyes are filled with tears.) Bieber paid $1.29 million for it, according to Etherscan, which tracks blockchain transactions, then went on to purchase a second for $470,000. For many observers, these were record-scratch moments in the middle of a long-running party, the kind of thing that made one wonder: What is going on?
Paris Hilton’s ape wears sunglasses and an S&M cap.
Bored Ape Yacht Club was born in the heady days of April 2021, when the value of cryptocurrency skyrocketed and the market for NFTs exploded. NFT (short for nonfungible token) is a unit of data stored on a blockchain, allowing for a record of who owns what to exist on a decentralized public ledger. Its four founders were pseudonymous, though BuzzFeed News recently identified two of them to be Greg Solano, 32, a writer and editor, and Wylie Aronow, 35. The concept was simple: 10,000 apes, each with a distinct face and outfit, each able to be individually owned.
“The term ape is used affectionately in the crypto community to mean early adopters,” says Nicole Muniz, CEO of Yuga Labs, which was part of the team that created the original ape NFTs, in an email. “We liked the idea of creating a whole collection around apes who became so wealthy because of crypto’s rise, that they became extremely…bored.” Buying an ape also gives one membership to an elite digital club—owners can hang out in Discord servers with like-minded Bored Ape enthusiasts.

A major appeal of Bored Apes is their use as avatars—many owners change their Twitter and WhatsApp and even LinkedIn display pictures to their apes. They draw less from the lo-fi early internet aesthetics of other NFT projects like CryptoPunks and more from comic books and Pokémon cards. The animated apes are frequently absurd; their fur might be cheetah print and their teeth rainbow. They stick out their tongues and smoke cigars and wear cowboy hats or fezzes or large sunglasses. Their use as avatars means the apes come to represent you, or something about you, in a specific digital realm. Last month, Gwyneth Paltrow bought one that, when animated, shows an ape with long blond hair that looks tacked on around its large ears, and big blue eyes—her own features transmuted onto a digital ape.
Gwyneth Paltrow’s ape, when animated, shakes its head to reveal long blond hair that looks tacked on around the ape’s large ears, and big blue eyes—her own features transmuted onto a digital ape.
One reason some are willing to spend big on these apes is that they’re part of one’s outward representation in the burgeoning metaverse, as one might invest in an eye-catching coat or handbag in the physical world. “I’m sort of trying to commit to this being my identity for a while,” says Adam Draper, managing director of Boost VC, a fund that was an early investor in cryptocurrencies, who bought his ape about five months ago for an undisclosed sum that he characterized as “expensive.”
Buying a Bored Ape also means buying the underlying intellectual property to your specific ape’s image—which more and more people are capitalizing by licensing for comic books, film and TV, even licensing images to cannabis companies. Draper says Bored Ape Yacht Club will be “the next Disney. ”

“It’s the Disney built by creators,” Draper says. “I believe it’s the fastest bootstrapped way to build IP.
“We are all a part of this community, this club, and we’re all trying to make our own apes more valuable, but by building a comic book series or making a movie or a sculpture, suddenly you’ve created value for the whole network.”

This network effect is what separates Bored Ape Yacht Club from other NFT projects. Athletes like Stephen Curry and Serena Williams, musicians like Eminem, Diplo and Future, and actors like Kevin Hart all own apes. (Many of the high-profile ape owners declined to comment for this article through their representatives.)
“Steph Curry was pretty early to Bored Apes, which makes sense because the NBA has already done partnerships like NBA Top Shot NFTs,” says Mason Nystrom, a senior research analyst at Messari, a crypto-market intelligence platform. “Once you get one celebrity or two, then you get 10, and there’s that flywheel effect.”
The rich and famous flocking to Bored Ape Yacht Club has prompted speculation that some are being given Bored Apes or are paid in exchange for promoting them. Many buy them through MoonPay, a fintech company that builds payment infrastructure for crypto and offers a “concierge service,” which handles the sometimes clunky process of buying NFTs for high-net-worth individuals (celebrities including Post Malone and Fallon have used it to get their Bored Apes). Justin Hamilton, a MoonPay spokesperson, says the service never involves giving Bored Apes to celebrities or paying them, and that it’s a fee-for-service business. Perhaps celebrities simply want them because other celebrities have them, he says.
Justin Bieber purchased his ape, which is sometimes called ‘Lonely Bored Ape,’ for $1.29 million.
“It has a lot of similar attributes of other scarce assets, so it’s developed a momentum of its own,” says Hamilton. “It’s sort of like asking, why did the latest Jordan drop become popular, or what’s the magic behind Supreme?”
A Bored Ape is, perhaps above all else, a strange status symbol for a highly particular subset of people.
“This is the Lamborghini of the digital world,” Draper says. “But it’s more effective, because you’re persistently online with it forever, but with a Lamborghini you’re not driving it forever.”