FT Elon Musk says Twitter deal ‘cannot move forward’ without bot clarity

Elon Musk says Twitter deal ‘cannot move forward’ without bot clarity
Billionaire bidder for social media platform takes aim at CEO in row over fake accounts

Elon Musk said his agreed $44bn purchase of Twitter “cannot move forward” until the social media platform provides proof over the number of fake accounts, just hours after he warned the takeover might fall through.

On Tuesday morning, Musk hit out again at Twitter chief executive Parag Agrawal for refusing to provide proof over the number of fake accounts. He tweeted that the “deal cannot move forward until he does”.

His tweet came just hours after the Tesla chief acknowledged at the All-In Summit in Miami that a lower price was “not out of the question”, adding to Wall Street fears that he is reconsidering his offer for the company.

On Friday, Musk declared on Twitter that he was putting the deal “on hold” over concerns there were more fake accounts on the platform than the “less than 5 per cent” that the social media company claims.

Musk has fuelled speculation on Wall Street that the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive is seeking to renegotiate the deal or walk away entirely, although he has said he is still committed to the transaction.

Asked on Monday if his Twitter purchase would go through, Musk said: “It really depends on a lot of factors here. I’m still waiting for some sort of logical explanation for the number of sort of fake or spam accounts on Twitter. And Twitter is refusing to tell us. This seems like a strange thing.”

He said he believed at least 20 per cent of the accounts on the network were fake, and that the proportion could be as high as 90 per cent.

Musk faces a $1bn break-up fee if he walks away, although Twitter can also sue him to force him to go through with the deal unless he can point to any significant information that was not disclosed at the time of the agreement.

Musk said it may be “a material adverse misstatement” if the number of bots is well above the 5 per cent that Twitter has disclosed. “Like if you said, OK, I’m going to agree to buy your house. You say the house has less than 5 per cent termites. That’s an acceptable number. But if it turns out the right per cent is 90 per cent termites, that’s not OK.”

Musk latched on to the issue of fake accounts after a regulatory filing this month in which Twitter repeated a standard warning that its estimate “may not accurately represent the actual number” of fake accounts, and the true total “could be higher”.

The timing of his intervention over a longstanding matter raised worries on Wall Street that he would use the issue as an excuse to reopen negotiations.

Twitter’s shares fell nearly 8 per cent on Monday, leaving them 30 per cent below the $54.20 a share that Musk had agreed to pay for the company. Most of the decline came before the reports of the billionaire’s comments about potentially paying a lower price.

Earlier on Monday, Musk challenged Agrawal on the platform after the Twitter chief executive published a lengthy thread outlining the methodology behind its estimate that spam makes up less than 5 per cent of its user base, saying that the figure could not be accurately ascertained by third parties without access to data such as IP addresses, geolocation and phone numbers.

Agrawal wrote: “We don’t believe that this specific estimation can be performed externally, given the critical need to use both public and private information (which we can’t share).”

He added that the “error margins on our estimates give us confidence in our public statements each quarter”.

“We shared an overview of the estimation process with Elon a week ago and look forward to continuing the conversation with him, and all of you,” Agrawal wrote on Twitter.

Musk replied with an emoji of a pile of poo. In a second tweet, he wrote: “So how do advertisers know what they’re getting for their money? This is fundamental to the financial health of Twitter.”

Musk also said at the Miami event that he was open to the idea of Twitter transforming into something in the west akin to WeChat, the all-encompassing “superapp” in China that allows users to shop, text and post to social media all within one app.

“Such an app would be really useful [in the west],” Musk said, adding that he was not sure whether Twitter should become this superapp, or whether it should be built from scratch. But he was certain about one thing: “This thing needs to exist.”

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls

  • Upgrades:
    • Advanced Micro (AMD) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at Piper Sandler; tgt raised to $140
    • Alliant Energy (LNT) upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at BofA Securities; tgt raised to $60
    • Equity Residential (EQR) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Mizuho; tgt lowered to $84
    • Essex Property ((ESS) upgraded to Buy from Sell at Goldman; tgt lowered to $338
    • PBF Energy (PBF) upgraded to Neutral from Underweight at JP Morgan; tgt $34
    • Ryanair Hldgs (RYAAY) upgraded to Strong Buy from Outperform at Raymond James; tgt $125
    • Shake Shack (SHAK) upgraded to Mkt Perform from Underperform at Raymond James
    • Stratasys (SSYS) upgraded to Neutral from Underweight at JP Morgan; tgt lowered to $23
    • Teva Pharma (TEVA) upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at BofA Securities; tgt $9
    • Turtle Beach (HEAR) upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Wedbush; tgt $27
    • Waters (WAT) upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at BofA Securities; tgt raised to $330
  • Downgrades:
    • Camden Property (CPT) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt lowered to $158
    • Maxar Technologies (MAXR) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $25
    • Molson Coors Brewing (TAP) downgraded to Mkt Perform from Outperform at Bernstein; tgt $59
    • Nerdy (NRDY) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt lowered to $3
    • Q2 Holdings (QTWO) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Stephens; tgt lowered to $50
    • Upwork (UPWK) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Stifel; tgt lowered to $20
    • UWM Holdings (UWMC) downgraded to Neutral from Outperform at Wedbush
    • Workday (WDAY) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at UBS
  • Others:
    • CNOOC Ltd (CEO) initiated with an Outperform at Credit Suisse
    • FactSet (FDS) initiated with a Sell at Redburn
    • J.B. Hunt Transport (JBHT) initiated with a Buy at The Benchmark Company; tgt $215
    • Livent (LTHM) initiated with a Hold at Deutsche Bank; tgt $29
    • Sportsman's Warehouse (SPWH) initiated with a Buy at B. Riley Securities; tgt $14

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • GLBE -26.7%, BZFD -10.8%, ALLT -9.6%, HPK -8.5%, ALBO -7.6%, WMT -6.6%, RPRX -4.8%

Other news:

  • IMPL -3.8% (files for $200 mln mixed securities shelf offering)
  • NLY -3.3% ($100 mln stock offering)
  • VMEO -2.4% (reports April metrics)
  • VCYT -2% (new data for Percepta Nasal Swab test in lung cancer risk assessment)
  • TWTR -2% (has filed its preliminary proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the previously announced agreement for Twitter to be acquired by affiliates of Elon Musk for $54.20 per share in cash; Elon Musk says TWTR deal "cannot move forward" until he gets information on percentage of fake accounts)
  • ESEA -1.4% (signs contract for construction of additional fuel efficient containerships)

Analyst comments:

  • NRDY -6.2% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman)
  • MAXR -5.4% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities)
  • WDAY -1.5% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at UBS)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • MVST +14.6%, SE +11.3%, ONON +11.1%, SSYS +10.9%, GAN +10.3%, NU +9.7%, JD +9.1%, TME +7%, DADA +6.9%, IONQ +6.4%, MAG +6.3%, UUUU +5.4%, TTWO +4.9%, UAL +4.5% (sees higher unit revenue outlook for Q2, demand continues to improve), SHLS +4.4%, HUYA +3.8%, RKLB +3.7% (also CAPSTONE spacecraft preps for launch to lunar orbit), FXLV +3.2%, HD +3.2%, DAC +2.9%, CCSI +1.8%, AER +1.3%, VOD +1.1%, RSKD +0.9%

Other news:

  • COIN +6.3% (announces it is "slowing hiring so we can reprioritize our hiring needs against our highest-priority business goals")
  • HLGN +5% (to restate Full Year 2021 Financials)
  • FFIE +3.6% (provides update on status of SEC filings)
  • LOGI +2.8% (increases yearly dividend 10% to CHF 0.96/share)
  • LH +2.7% (launches at-home collection device for diabetes risk testing)
  • NETI +2.6% (Scorpio Holdings increases stake by 250K shares)
  • ABB +2.1% (highlights Energy transition driving profitable growth at Capital Markets Day)
  • IREN +2% (names new CFO)
  • FSLR +2% (to sell project development and O&M platform in Japan)
  • VALE +2% (concludes buyback program and launches new program)
  • ABT +1.8% (enters into consent decree with FDA related to infant formula plant could restart plant within two weeks; also confirms FY22 EPS guidance)
  • RH +1.8% (announces $500 mln incremental term debt financing)
  • IXHL +1.7% (completed a highly constructive pre-IND meeting with the FDA to discuss the development IHL-42X)
  • LXU +1.4% (authorizes new $50 mln share repurchase program)
  • EAT +1.2% (CEO Wyman Roberts to retire Kevin Hochman named successor)
  • WSC +1.2% (acquires Elite Modular Leasing and Sales)
  • AGCO +1.1% (provides update on ransomware attack)
  • GILD +1% (FDA lifts hold on IND for lenacapavir for HIV)
  • UGI +1% (receives funding for RNG projects)
  • RPAY +1% (authorizes share repurchase program to purchase up to $50 mln of the Company's Class A common stock)

Analyst comments:

  • PBF +5.6% (upgraded to Neutral from Underweight at JP Morgan)
  • HEAR +4.9% (upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Wedbush)
  • AMD +3.8% (upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at Piper Sandler)
  • SHAK +2.7% (upgraded to Mkt Perform from Underperform at Raymond James)
  • TEVA +2.7% (upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at BofA Securities)
  • EQR +2.2% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Mizuho)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

  • Gapping up:
    • NU +10.8%, GAN +10.3%, TTWO +7.5%, IONQ +7.4%, ONON +7.1%, COIN +7%, TME +6.5%, RKLB +6.3%, MVST +5.7%, UUUU +5.7%, DADA +5.3%, HLGN +5%, SHLS +5%, IREN +4.9%, UAL +4.7%, HD +4.6%, FFIE +4.4%, DAC +4.1%, HUYA +3.3%, SSYS +3.2%, FXLV +3.2%, VALE +2.9%, IMPL +2.8%, NETI +2.6%, FSLR +2.5%, LOGI +2.2%, ABB +2%, CCSI +1.8%, IXHL +1.7%, LXU +1.4%, EAT +1.2%, WSC +1.2%, UGI +1%, RPAY +1%, VOD +1%
  • Gapping down:
    • GLBE -26.7%, BZFD -10.8%, ALBO -10.4%, NLY -4%, ALLT -3.8%, HPK -2.5%, VMEO -2.4%, TWTR -2.4%, VCYT -2%, SSNC -1.7%, ESEA -1.4%

FT : Military briefing: why Russia and Ukraine are fighting over Snake Island

Military briefing: why Russia and Ukraine are fighting over Snake Island
Black Sea outcrop is as much a tool of propaganda as of military strategy for Moscow and Kyiv

Snake Island leapt to international attention early in Russia’s war against Ukraine when its tiny garrison was told to surrender or face naval bombardment and certain death. “Russian warship, go fnck yourself,” came the now celebrated response from one of its guardsmen, Roman Hrybov.

Three months on, the 0.2 square kilometre island — barely more than an outcrop of rock — remains at the centre of a bitter fight as Ukraine and Russia vie for control of the Black Sea and the conflict’s broader propaganda battle.

Moscow has been unable to reinforce its position there to secure control against Ukrainian drone and air strikes. But nor can Ukraine, which has limited naval capacity, muster sufficient power to regain and hold the island.

The to-ing and fro-ing over the island is in many ways a microcosm of the war itself. Snake Island has strategic significance, as a military base there could dominate an area spanning hundreds of miles. But the fight has also taken on a totemic significance, spun by both sides to bolster morale.

Despite Hrybov’s valiant refusal to surrender, Snake Island’s garrison did lay down their arms and were later released by the Russians in a prisoner swap.

Snake Island “is strategically useful”, said a western official. “But it also has a symbolism that is possibly even more important.”


According to Greek mythology, Poseidon created Snake Island as a haven for Achilles and Helen. Today, with no trees or fresh water but boasting a helipad and two deepwater piers, the X-shaped rocky protrusion lies in the middle of Ukraine’s crucial shipping lanes. It is also just 35km from the coast of Nato member Romania. (Bucharest’s own claims to the island were dismissed by the International Court of Justice in 2009).

For Ukraine, preventing Moscow from using the island as a missile and naval base would help break Russia’s Black Sea economic blockade of maritime exports, including grain, of which Ukraine is a top global supplier.

Russia could also use the island as a base to attack Odesa and expand the conflict into Moldova and its Moscow-allied breakaway state of Transnistria. It could even potentially hinder the deployment of Nato weapons and troops from Romania.

“The one who controls the island can at any time block the movement of commercial vessels in all directions to the south of Ukraine,” Kyrylo Budanov, chief of Ukraine’s military intelligence, said on Friday.

So far, Ukraine has frustrated Russian attempts to turn Snake Island into a secure base, hitting Russian air defence systems and resupply vessels with air strikes and the Turkish Bayraktar drones that have led to some of Ukraine’s most spectacular military successes.

A video of aerial footage posted by Ukraine’s armed services on May 8 claims to show a drone strike taking down a Russian helicopter hovering over the island. Two days earlier, another video boasted that drone strikes had sunk a Russian patrol boat and destroyed a short-range missile system.

“This is what happens when you weren’t invited to Snake Island,” the post reads as techno music plays.

Moscow has its own version of events. During the attack, according to the Ministry of Defence, Russia shot down four Ukrainian aircraft, almost 30 unmanned aerial vehicles and at least three helicopters. Two dozen Ukrainian “saboteurs” were also purportedly killed, as was the deputy commander of Ukraine’s navy, Colonel Ihor Bedzai. Ukraine has confirmed Bedzai’s death but not the battle in which he died.

“This adventure ended in disaster for Ukraine,” said spokesman Igor Konashenkov.

Michael Kofman, director of Russia studies at the CNA military think-tank, is less convinced, however.

“You can tell from the Russian operation, it’s still unclear what they’re trying to do there,” he told a War on the Rocks podcast. “The Russian military has been the king of not well-co-ordinated efforts . . . sending in units without air support, then getting those lost and sending units to recover them . . . then sending a special forces unit with a helicopter and getting that killed by” Turkish drones.

The Russian army has similarly struggled to mount co-ordinated military operations in the battle for the Donbas, where the bulk of the fighting is now concentrated.

Militarily, analysts say Snake Island’s size and lack of cover make it all but indefensible. Unless Moscow manages to install air defence systems, or place a battleship with similar systems nearby, “Russian positions on the island are unsustainable”, Rochan Consulting, a military analysis group, wrote in a May 15 briefing. “Neither option looks currently viable.”

Ukraine’s immediate aim is not to physically control Snake Island, as its own troops would be as vulnerable as those of Russia. Rather, it wants to stop Moscow from fortifying its position and installing long-range air defence systems that could protect the area and allow for naval operations.

Andriy Zagorodnyuk, a former Ukrainian defence minister who advises the government on security, said Russia’s de facto control of Snake Island “becomes less critical if we destroy everything that arrives”.

Zagorodnyuk said two nearby oil rigs — now under Russian control — are also being used by Russia as military platforms to control and blockade maritime shipping.

“We need to deny their access to our territorial waters,” said Zagorodnyuk. “It’s very much pressing from an economic survival perspective should the war drag on.”

FT : Electric vehicles overtake phones as top source of cobalt demand

Electric vehicles overtake phones as top source of cobalt demand
Rare metal’s price surges on supply concerns and proliferation of battery-powered cars

Electric vehicles overtook smartphones and personal computers for the first time last year as the main source of demand for cobalt, a rare metal used in lithium-ion batteries.

The automotive industry consumed 59,000 tonnes of cobalt in 2021, or 34 per cent of total demand, as sales of electric and hybrid vehicles doubled, according to a report by the Cobalt Institute.

That outstripped the 26,000 tonnes of metal used in mobile phone manufacturing and 16,000 tonnes in laptops and tablets. Total demand for cobalt was 175,000 tonnes against mined supply of 160,000 tonnes.

The mismatch in those figures highlights one of the biggest challenges facing the automotive industry as it goes electric: securing enough raw material. As more electric vehicles are rolled out, concerns are mounting about potential supply crunches for crucial battery metals from cobalt to lithium and nickel. Demand from the car industry is expected to account for half of the cobalt demand by 2026.

Cobalt is seen as particularly problematic because it is a byproduct of mining copper and nickel, and supply is very concentrated by geography and company.

Almost three-quarters of the world’s mined cobalt supply comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo, where production is dominated by Chinese companies and London-listed Glencore. The Cobalt Institute report shows that the central African country produced 118,000 tonnes of cobalt in 2021 — significantly more than the next largest supplier, Australia, at just 5,600 tonnes.

That has fuelled speculation about whether a big carmaker might acquire a miner. Tesla’s chief executive Elon Musk told an industry conference last week that he was open to the idea.

“It’s not out of the question,” he said at the FT Future of the Car Summit. “We will address whatever limitations are on accelerating the world’s transition to sustainable energy. It’s not that we wish to buy mining companies, but if that’s the only way to accelerate the transition, then we will do that.” Tesla has a goal of producing 20mn electric vehicles annually, up from 1mn last year.

A growing number of electric cars in China — the world’s largest EV market — are powered by lost-cost lithium-iron phosphate batteries, which generally have inferior range and performance. But the top models in the US and Europe are still dominated by nickel-cobalt chemistries. These batteries accounted for three-quarters of global EV demand in 2021, according to the report.

“Cobalt-containing batteries are a technology of choice for many car manufacturers in Europe, North America and China,” said Adam McCarthy, president of the Cobalt Institute.

Looking ahead, the institute sees cobalt demand hitting 320,000 tonnes in the next five years, up from 175,000 tonnes in 2021, as the car industry produces more battery-powered vehicles.

While supply is expected to pick up this year and in 2023, leading to a more balanced market, the Cobalt Institute says it will start to slow from 2024, leading to large deficits. “From 2024-26 supply growth will average 8 per cent per year, compared to more than 12 per cent for demand,” the report projected.

The price of cobalt doubled last year, rising from $16 a pound to $32/lb on the back of strong demand from the automotive sector and supply disruptions. It is currently trading at $37/lb.

FT : Elon Musk raises prospect of lower price for Twitter deal

Elon Musk raises prospect of lower price for Twitter deal
Tesla chief executive pushes bot concerns amid speculation he is trying to reopen or walk away from deal

Elon Musk acknowledged on Monday that his agreed $44bn purchase of Twitter might fall through and that a lower price was “not out of the question”, adding to Wall Street fears that he is reconsidering his offer for the company.

The comments at the All-In Summit in Miami came three days after Musk declared on Twitter that he was putting the deal “on hold” over concerns there were more fake accounts on the platform than the “less than 5 per cent” that the social media company claims.

On Tuesday morning, Musk hit out again at Twitter chief executive Parag Agrawal for refusing to provide proof over the number of fake accounts. He tweeted that the “deal cannot move forward until he does”.

Musk’s comments have fuelled speculation on Wall Street that the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive is seeking to renegotiate the deal or walk away entirely, though he has said he is still committed to the transaction.

Asked on Monday if his Twitter purchase will go through, Musk said: “It really depends on a lot of factors here. I’m still waiting for some sort of logical explanation for the number of sort of fake or spam accounts on Twitter. And Twitter is refusing to tell us. This seems like a strange thing.”

He said he believed at least 20 per cent of the accounts on the network were fake, and that the proportion could be as high as 90 per cent.

Musk faces a $1bn break-up fee if he walks away, though Twitter can also sue him to force him to go through with the deal unless he can point to any significant information that was not disclosed at the time of the agreement.

Musk said it may be “a material adverse misstatement” if the number of bots is well above the 5 per cent that Twitter has disclosed. “Like if you said, OK, I’m going to agree to buy your house. You say the house has less than 5 per cent termites. That’s an acceptable number. But if it turns out it the right per cent is 90 per cent termites, that’s not OK.”

Musk latched on to the issue of fake accounts after a regulatory filing earlier this month in which Twitter repeated a standard warning that its estimate “may not accurately represent the actual number” of fake accounts, and the true total “could be higher”.

The timing of his intervention over a longstanding matter raised worries on Wall Street that he would use the issue as an excuse to reopen negotiations.

Twitter’s shares fell nearly 8 per cent on Monday, leaving them 30 per cent below the $54.20 a share that Musk has agreed to pay for the company. Most of the decline came before the reports of the billionaire’s comments about potentially paying a lower price.

Earlier on Monday, Musk challenged Agrawal on the platform after the Twitter chief executive published a lengthy thread outlining the methodology behind its estimate that spam makes up less than 5 per cent of its user base, arguing that the figure could not be accurately ascertained by third parties without access to data such as IP addresses, geolocation and phone numbers.

Agrawal wrote: “We don’t believe that this specific estimation can be performed externally, given the critical need to use both public and private information (which we can’t share).”

He added that the “error margins on our estimates give us confidence in our public statements each quarter”.

“We shared an overview of the estimation process with Elon a week ago and look forward to continuing the conversation with him, and all of you,” Agrawal wrote on Twitter.

Musk replied with an emoji of a pile of poo. In a second tweet, he wrote: “So how do advertisers know what they’re getting for their money? This is fundamental to the financial health of Twitter.”

Musk also said at the Miami event that he was open to the idea of Twitter transforming into something akin to the west’s WeChat, the all-encompassing “superapp” in China that allows users to shop, text and post to social media all within one app.

“Such an app would be really useful (in the west),” Musk said, adding that he was not sure whether Twitter should become this superapp, or whether it should be built from scratch. But he was certain about one thing: “This thing needs to exist.”

FT Lebanon’s Hizbollah and allies lose majority in election

Lebanon’s Hizbollah and allies lose majority in election
Blow to country’s most formidable political and military force as independents make gains

Iran-backed group Hizbollah and its allies have lost their majority in Lebanon’s parliamentary election, in a surprise blow to the country’s most formidable political and military force.

Hizbollah and its two major allies secured at least 44 seats, down from 47 in the 2018 poll. Some of the other politicians it relies on to make up its current 71 seat majority have also lost their seats. No one party or bloc has emerged as an outright winner, raising the possibility of further deadlock in the crisis-hit country.

Independents — many of whom emerged from a civil society movement that called for political change — and parties opposed to Hizbollah and its allies secured at least 13 of the 128 seats, according to the official tally. Several parties said they would appeal.

These are the first elections since the collapse of the country’s economy in 2019 and a deadly 2020 port explosion in Beirut. Lebanon’s political class has so far evaded accountability for its role in bringing the country to its knees.

The new government must negotiate economic reforms needed to unlock billions of dollars in loans and aid to steer Lebanon out of its economic crisis. But analysts say Sunday’s results could further fragment an already deeply divided parliament, leading to political paralysis at a critical time for the country.

Together with the Free Patriotic Movement, the Maronite Christian party of President Michel Aoun; Amal, the Shia militia-turned-party, as well as some MPs in minority parties; Hizbollah had held a majority of at least 71 seats since 2018.

Hizbollah and Amal retained the 27 seats allocated to Shia Muslims under the country’s confessional system, despite nascent discontent within its traditional strongholds. But the allies they relied on for their majority — the FPM and other individuals — lost some seats.

Two of the new independents were elected in Christian and Druze districts in southern Lebanon that have traditionally been dominated by Hizbollah allies, with one of them ousting the deputy speaker of parliament.

The Christian Lebanese Forces party, led by former warlord Samir Geagea, gained several seats. The Lebanese Forces is a fierce critic of Hizbollah and Geagea enjoys close ties with Iran’s regional rival, Saudi Arabia.

The emergence of independents will make it even less likely that lawmakers will be able to work together to pass laws to kick-start Lebanon’s recovery, analysts say. “What you do have is a more fragmented parliament . . . Together, they do not see eye to eye on many things . . . But they will have an important role to play collectively,” said Maha Yahya, director of the Beirut-based Carnegie Middle East Center.

Prime Minister Najib Mikati urged the newly elected lawmakers to act quickly to agree a government “because what we are going through cannot withstand bickering at the expense of priorities.”

The Lebanese Association for Democratic Elections, an independent election observer, said it documented more than 3,500 violations, including barely conscious voters carried into polling stations on stretchers. It said their monitors were threatened and beaten by members of various ruling parties, including Hizbollah, Amal and the Lebanese Forces.