WSJ : Vista Equity Partners Close to $4 Billion Buyout of EngageSmart

WSJ : Vista Equity Partners Close to $4 Billion Buyout of EngageSmart
The private-equity firm would pay $23 a share for the customer engagement and payments software business

Vista Equity Partners is close to a $4 billion deal to acquire business-software company EngageSmart ESMT -2.18%decrease; red down pointing triangle, a sizable buyout at a time when many private-equity firms are sitting on the sidelines.

Under the terms of the deal, shareholders in the customer engagement and payments software specialist would receive $23 a share in cash, according to people familiar with the situation. The deal could be announced as soon as Monday, barring any last-minute snags.

Based in Braintree, Mass., EngageSmart develops cloud-based software used by clinicians to manage their practices. It also offers electronic-invoice technology that helps governments, utilities and financial-services firms bill clients more efficiently. Nonprofits and other organizations that rely on donations, meanwhile, use the company’s products to bolster their fundraising efforts, its website says.

EngageSmart is listed in New York and controlled by General Atlantic, another investment firm. Reuters earlier this month reported that the business was seeking a buyer. It services more than 100,000 customers, mostly among small and mid-sized businesses, and generated a profit of $20.6 million last year, its latest annual report said.

Vista manages more than $100 billion of assets, focused on enterprise software, data and other technology companies. The take-private would be one in a string of recent deals for Vista. In February the firm completed the $4.6 billion purchase of cybersecurity firm KnowBe4, and more recently closed the $2.6 billion acquisition of software company Duck Creek. The Austin, Texas-based firm recently sold its portfolio company Apptio to IBM for $4.6 billion.

FT : Foxconn: China probes warn Taiwanese to Gou figure

Foxconn: China probes warn Taiwanese to Gou figure
Historically, such investigations have foreshadowed broader crackdowns

Billionaire entrepreneurs tend to say what they think. That certainly applies to Terry Gou. The founder of Taiwanese iPhone maker Foxconn, has trumpeted that he will take no orders from Beijing or bow to its threats.

This helps Guo’s positioning in the race to become the next president of Taiwan, an independent island long-claimed by China. For Foxconn, standing up to the Chinese dragon will be harder.

Chinese state media has reported official probes at Foxconn’s mainland manufacturing bases on tax and other compliance grounds. China’s natural resources department conducted on-site investigations into land use by Foxconn enterprises in Henan and Hubei provinces.

This is a shrewd way for Beijing to remind Taipei of its power. The audits come just months before Taiwan’s January presidential election.

Putting pressure on one of Taiwan’s largest companies tells Taiwanese to watch their step. Targets include Gou, who has resigned from Foxconn’s board but remains the largest shareholder. Another is leading candidate vice-president William Lai. He is expected to take a hardline stance against Chinese aggression

The land use probes are especially worrying. One focuses on Zhengzhou, the capital of east-central China’s Henan province, and home to Foxconn plants that makes products for global brands including Apple. Known as “iPhone City” it employs 200,000 workers.

Disruption from government raids or penalties could prove costly for Foxconn and its global clients. Worker protests that shook the Zhengzhou plant last year meant about $1bn each week in lost iPhone sales, according to analysts’ estimates.

Local competition is growing. For more than a decade, Foxconn had an unrivalled lead in assembly and production of high quality products at a scale that was needed for global groups such as Apple. Now, foreign customers are ordering growing volumes of premium products from Chinese contract manufacturers such as Luxshare.

Shares of Foxconn slipped on Monday. The stock of China-listed subsidiary Foxconn Industrial Internet fell by its daily limit of 10 per cent. Foxconn trades at 11 times forward earnings, Chinese rival Luxshare Precision Industry trades at more than a 50 per cent premium to Foxconn

Historically, Chinese probes into companies have foreshadowed broader crackdowns. Police recently raided the Shanghai offices of WPP-owned media agency GroupM and questioned staff at consulting group Bain. Beijing may be readying a push against foreign multinationals as a whole.

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls
  • Upgrades:
    • Arvinas (ARVN) upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Wedbush; tgt lowered to $24
    • BioMarin Pharmaceutical (BMRN) upgraded to Mkt Perform from Underperform at Bernstein; tgt $82
    • Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan; tgt raised to $28.50
    • Bright Horizons (BFAM)upgraded to Neutral from Sell at UBS; tgt raised to $83
    • Citizens Financial Group (CFG) upgraded to Peer Perform from Underperform at Wolfe Research
    • DigitalOcean (DOCN) upgraded to Neutral from Underweight at Piper Sandler; tgt lowered to $22
    • Edison (EIX) upgraded to Outperform from In-line at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $68
    • Huntington Banc (HBAN) upgraded to Peer Perform from Underperform at Wolfe Research
    • Ionis Pharma (IONS) upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at BofA Securities; tgt raised to $52
    • Lindsay Corp (LNN) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at ROTH MKM; tgt raised to $150
    • Pinterest (PINS) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Stifel; tgt raised to $32
    • Republic Services (RSG) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at UBS; tgt raised to $175
    • Spirit Aerosystems (SPR) upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Bernstein; tgt raised to $29
    • Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan; tgt raised to $30
    • Waste Mgmt (WM) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at UBS; tgt raised to $190
  • Downgrades:
    • Alcoa (AA) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $25
    • Alteryx (AYX) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at Piper Sandler; tgt $30
    • Asana (ASAN) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at Piper Sandler; tgt lowered to $16
    • Diamondback Energy (FANG) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt raised to $170
    • Equity Lifestyle Properties (ELS) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $64
    • EOG Resources (EOG) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt lowered to $135
    • Matterport (MTTR) downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at Piper Sandler; tgt lowered to $2
    • RingCentral (RNG) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Rosenblatt; tgt lowered to $35
    • Salesforce (CRM) downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at Piper Sandler; tgt lowered to $232
    • Unity Software (U) downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at Piper Sandler; tgt lowered to $30
    • Viatris (VTRS) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $9
  • Others:
    • Akamai Tech (AKAM) placed on 30-day Upside Catalyst Watch at Citigroup
    • AtriCure (ATRC) initiated with a Mkt Outperform at JMP Securities; tgt $60
    • BCB Bancorp (BCBP) assumed with a Neutral at Piper Sandler; tgt $11.50
    • Booking Holdings (BKNG) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $3650
    • Celsius (CELH) initiated with an Outperform at William Blair
    • Ceridian HCM (CDAY) initiated with a Neutral at Goldman; tgt $74
    • Choice Hotels (CHH) initiated with a Hold at HSBC Securities; tgt $131
    • Constellation Brands (STZ) placed on 90-day positive catalyst watch at Citigroup
    • Datadog (DDOG) initiated with a Neutral at Guggenheim
    • Dynatrace (DT) initiated with a Buy at Guggenheim; tgt $58
    • Expedia Group (EXPE) initiated with a Hold at HSBC Securities; tgt $114
    • Hilton (HLT) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $191
    • Host Hotels (HST) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $21
    • Hyatt Hotels (H) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $133
    • Instacart (CART) initiated with a Neutral at MoffettNathanson; tgt $30
    • Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) initiated with a Mkt Outperform at JMP Securities; tgt $60
    • Marriott (MAR) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $233
    • MGM Resorts (MGM) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $49
    • Okta (OKTA) placed on 90-day Downside Catalyst Watch at Citigroup
    • Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) initiated with a Hold at HSBC Securities; tgt $13
    • PG&E (PCG) resumed with an In-line at Evercore ISI; tgt $16
    • Ready Capital (RC) assumed with a Buy at BTIG Research; tgt lowered to $12
    • Royal Caribbean (RCL) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $115
    • Service Properties Trust (SVC) initiated with a Hold at HSBC Securities; tgt $8
    • Spotify (SPOT) initiated with a Market Perform at TD Cowen; tgt $129
    • Velocity Financial (VEL) initiated with a Buy at BTIG Research; tgt $14
    • Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $87
    • Wynn Resorts (WYNN) initiated with a Buy at HSBC Securities; tgt $111

>>> Activist hedge fund Trian builds stake in Allstate

Activist hedge fund Trian builds stake in Allstate

Trian Fund Management, activist hedge fund led by Nelson Peltz, has built a stake in Allstate Corporation (ALL), one of the insurers struggling to cope with the fallout of natural disasters, Reuters has reported.

According to the news agency, the move could increase pressure on Chief Executive Tom Wilson to turn the company around following five quarters of losses. For the second quarter of 2023, the insurer saw a net loss applicable to common shareholders of $1.4 billion.

Allstate has argued that natural disasters, sometimes amplified by climate change, have been the main driver for its poor performance.

People familiar with the matter said that the company has hired investment bankers to develop a response. Trian’s exact stake and plans for Allstate are still unknown. Allstate and Trian did not immediately respond to requests for comment, Reuters added.

Allstate shares jumped 6% on the news, to $127.46 in Monday trading in New York. Prior to news of Trian’s involvement, Allstate’s stock price had dropped 9% year-to-date, significantly underperforming a 4% rise in the S&P 500 Property & Casualty Insurance index (.SPLRCINPC), due to its exposure to losses in property and auto insurance.

According to KBW’s (Keefe, Bruyette & Woods) Melissa Roberts, historically, financial stocks in which Trian has invested have outperformed both the S&P 500 (SPX) and SPX Fins on the day of the investment’s announcement, and over both the week and the month following the announcements of Trian’s investments.

If Reuter’s report is accurate and Trian plans to push for changes, KBW analysts commented, there could be at least two (non-mutually exclusive) key opportunities.

1. Divesting the non-Property Liability segments (i.e., Allstate Services and Allstate Health and Benefits) to simplify ALL’s operations and boost its capital; and/or
2. Improving ALL’s execution – and consequently its underwriting profitability – to more closely resemble PGR’s and GEICO’s.

“We think that ALL is very unlikely to issue equity capital, especially as Hurricane Season 2023 winds down and as the combination of accumulating auto rate increases and apparently stabilising personal auto claim cost inflation implies near-term capital generation, rather than erosion, from earnings. Still, capital adequacy (most recently reflected in ALL’s suspended share repurchases) remains a key investor focus,” KBW stated.

Analysts estimate that selling Allstate Services (which includes Allstate Protection Plans, Allstate Dealer Services, Allstate Roadside, Arity, and Allstate Identity Protection) and Allstate Health and Benefits, could generate at least $3.6-4.3 billion of pre-tax proceeds.

Assuming a consolidated multiple – businesses do not need to be sold together – of 10-12x implies total proceeds of $3.6-4.3 billion, which should largely address concerns over ALL’s capital needs, according to the report.

“We believe that ALL management is very committed to these businesses, but we believe that very few of ALL’s current or potential shareholders are as invested in keeping them as part of ALL; we encounter virtually no questions about these units,” KBW said.

According to analysts, an activist investor could also help ALL improve execution. Over the long term, ALL’s private passenger auto premium growth has trailed both PGR’s and GEICO’s, KBW explains.

Adding: “To be sure, PGR and GEICO benefit from significant exposure to direct-to-consumer distribution, for which demographics represent a considerable tailwind, while the much slower-growing captive agency channel still accounts for a significant majority of ALL’s Property-Liability premiums. On the other hand, ALL’s private passenger automobile book hasn’t really produced the superior underwriting results that should stem from a stickier but slower-growing customer base.”

Even ignoring the particularly unprofitable 2022 results, ALL’s statutory PPA combined ratio averaged 97.3% between 1996 and 2021, versus PGR’s 94.1% and GEICO’s 95.6% over the same period.

“To some extent, we think ALL suffers unfairly from the “obvious” comparisons to the uniquely phenomenal PGR; the rest of the industry’s consolidated average 1996-2021 combined ratio was 101.5%. Still, we think it’s very reasonable for an activist investor to contend that considerably more value could be extracted from ALL’s various businesses than has actually been the case,” KBW analysts concluded.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • FMC -13.9% (guidance), HOPE -3.4%
Other news:
  • RVMD -35.6% (presents promising clinical activity and safety data from Phase 1/1b Trial of RMC-6236)
  • EPIX -3.3% (Presents Updated Phase 1 Masofaniten (EPI-7386) Clinical Data at the European Society of Medical Oncology 2023 Congress)
  • CVX -2.7% (Hess to be acquired by Chevron for $171 per share)
  • VTRS -2.6% (President to retires April 1, 2024; also downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities)
  • BLNK -2.2% (files universal shelf registration statement for up to $400 million of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants)
  • EXAS -1.2% (advances Early Cancer Detection and Precision Oncology Programs with Data Presentations at ESMO 2023 Annual Congress; reports Next-Generation Cologuard Test Demonstrates High Sensitivity and Specificity in Pivotal BLUE-C Study, Significantly Outperforming Fecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) for Cancer and Precancer Detection)
  • TSLA -1.2% (disloses in 10Q filing that its expects its capital expenditures to exceed $9.00 billion in 2023 and be between $7.00 to $9.00 billion in each of the following two fiscal years)
  • TLT -0.9% (US 10-yr yiled over 5%)
Analyst comments:
  • AA -3.1% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)
  • FANG -1.5% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup)
  • EOG -1.5% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup)
  • ELS -1% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • BOH +3.9%, PHG +1.3%
Other news:
  • TGH +42.9% (to be acquired by Stonepeak for $7.4 bln)
  • HARP +20.5% (Announces Updated Interim Tolerability and Response Data from Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial of T Cell Engager HPN328 at ESMO Congress 2023)
  • VERV +13.1% (announced the lifting of the clinical hold and clearance of its Investigational New Drug (IND) application)
  • ARVN +5.9% (presents potential of PROTAC AR Degraders Reinforced by 11.1 months rPFS with Bavdegalutamide and Updated Positive Interim Data from Second Generation ARV-766 in mCRPC; also upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Wedbush)
  • ORIC +5.1% (reports initial Phase 1 Dose Escalation Data of ORIC-114 in Patients with EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Mutations Demonstrates Potential Best-In-Class Profile) ROIV +5.1% (Roche acquires Telavant from Roivant for $7.1 bln)
  • GH +1.4% (reports first results from PEGASUS trial reported at ESMO show promise for use of liquid biopsy to guide adjuvant treatment of colon cancer)

WSJ : Bond Rout Drives 10-Year Treasury Yield to 5%

Bond Rout Drives 10-Year Treasury Yield to 5%
The benchmark for U.S. borrowing costs has climbed at a rate alarming to investors

A deepening selloff in the U.S. bond market drove the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note to 5% for the first time in 16 years, extending a rout that has rattled stocks, lifted mortgage rates and fueled persistent fears of an economic slowdown.

A critical driver of U.S. borrowing costs, the 10-year yield rose to within a few thousandths of a percentage point of 5% last week following an unexpectedly strong retail-sales report and comments from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell that reinforced investor bets on stubbornly high short-term interest rates.

The 5% barrier barely held then, but broke in an early Monday climb. The 10-year yield reached as high as 5.021%, according to Tradeweb, up from roughly 3.8% at the start of the year.

Yields, which rise when bond prices fall, have climbed since the start of 2022, when investors began worrying in earnest that the Fed might raise interest rates to fight inflation.

In recent weeks, though, the selloff has only grown more intense and potentially destabilizing, with the 10-year yield jumping at times more than 0.1 percentage point a day and investors scrambling for explanations. The lack of clarity has only added to investors’ anxieties, reflected by declines in stocks that have pulled major indexes off their summer highs.

Many investors and analysts argue that high yields make sense given signs that a resilient U.S. economy can withstand much higher interest rates than previously believed. Investor expectations for higher rates drive down prices of Treasurys and push up yields because investors anticipate that new bonds will offer larger interest payments.

Others, though, worry that yields have become unmoored from the outlook for Fed policy and are responding to more unpredictable factors, such as souring sentiment about the size of the federal budget deficit and government’s willingness to address it.

The two theories imply different outcomes. If falling bond prices are justified by the strong economy, concerns about a 5% yield on the 10-year may prove just as fleeting as when the yield reached other milestones, dating back to early 2022 when it jumped to 2.5% from 1.5%.

If not, higher yields may finally lift borrowing costs to a point that businesses and consumers substantially pull back on spending.

“The question is: Is a 5% 10-year the type of number that breaks the U.S. economy?” said Scott Kimball, chief investment officer at Loop Capital Management. “Probably not, but you’re going to be in that yellow” caution zone, he added.

Investors and economists pay close attention to Treasury yields, and the 10-year yield in particular, because they set a floor on the interest rates across the economy, including those on mortgages and corporate debt.

For investors, yields also represent a risk-free return that they can get by holding government bonds to maturity—an important benchmark for determining the prices of riskier assets such as stocks.

A 5% 10-year yield is hardly unprecedented in U.S. history. But it was unthinkable to most investors just a few years ago, after a decade of sluggish inflation and ultraloose Fed policies, including near zero short-term interest rates and direct purchases of Treasurys.

The Covid-19 pandemic marked a turning point, leading to historic government stimulus programs, a surge in inflation and a different economy, marked by healthier private-sector balance sheets, changed work habits and much higher rates.

Investors’ views of the economy have evolved gradually. At the start of this year, many expected yields to fall based on the assumption that they were already high enough to precipitate a recession.

Instead, growth has remained steady. And yields have generally kept rising, outside of a scare in March when the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank spurred fears of an imminent downturn. Yields also fell in the wake of Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack against Israel but have since picked up again.

For all the debate about what has fueled the latest, more acute selloff, most investors agree that the 10-year yield rose in the summer due largely to bets that interest rates would stay high for longer.

Investors had previously piled into wagers that the Fed would keep raising interest rates until it triggered a recession, and then start cutting rates significantly. That led investors to prefer longer-term Treasurys—holding their yields well below those of shorter-term ones in what is known on Wall Street as an inverted yield curve.

“The classic, very crowded trade was to own longer-duration fixed income, because typically in a recession bond yields go down and, if you own longer duration bonds, you make more money,” said Jim Caron, chief investment officer of the portfolio solutions group at Morgan Stanley Investment Management.

By the late summer, though, conditions were changing: inflation was cooling and the Fed was signaling that it was nearly done raising rates. Still, the economy, instead of sputtering, was showing signs of accelerating.

The result was a massive reversal in investor positioning, with longer-term Treasurys falling out of favor along with recession bets. Yields on those bonds shot higher, closing the gap with short-term yields.

Meanwhile, other potential challenges have emerged.

At the end of July, the Treasury Department announced that it would need to borrow more in the coming months than investors had been anticipating, leading to a larger-than-expected increase in the size of short and long-term Treasury debt auctions. The following day, Fitch Ratings downgraded the U.S. credit rating to just below triple-A, citing a worsening budget outlook and governance concerns, highlighted by standoffs over lifting the federal debt ceiling.

Since then, the rise in Treasury yields has only further fed anxieties about the budget, given that higher yields mean the government needs to spend more on interest payments. And Washington has continued to show signs of dysfunction, narrowly averting a government shutdown in a short-term budget deal that resulted in the ouster of Kevin McCarthy as House speaker.

Those type of developments are all helping to push yields higher, as investors balk at the prospect of ever larger Treasurys issuance, said Kimball, of Loop.

“Whether the government wants to admit it or not, the U.S. Treasury is now more double-A than it is triple-A,” he said.

Supporting the argument that a growing volume of Treasurys is feeding the bond selloff, some widely-tracked financial models have suggested that Treasury yields have climbed in recent weeks not because interest-rate forecasts have changed but because of an increase in the so-called term premium. That category covers all possible factors other than baseline rate expectations, including uncertainty about the rate outlook and supply-demand dynamics.

The question of what is moving Treasury yields is important because an uncontrolled bond selloff, removed from economic fundamentals, has the potential to be much more disruptive than an orderly rise in yields. A recent example is last year’s sharp declines in U.K government bonds that started when then Prime Minister Liz Truss proposed large tax cuts and only ended when Truss stepped down and the plans were scrapped.

Still, some investors say that alarm about the U.S. fiscal situation is overblown and not having a major impact on bonds.

Leah Traub, a portfolio manager at Lord Abbett, noted that government auctions of Treasurys have generally proceeded smoothly in recent weeks, with signs of less demand from overseas—where bond yields are also rising quickly—but increased demand from domestic buyers.

Traub is among those who have been wagering that the 10-year yield would rise. But her rationale has been that it will be difficult for inflation to fall all the way down to the Fed’s 2% target, causing the market to adjust to a higher path for rates.

“The labor market is still very, very tight,” she said. “And it would take a lot of economic weakness, a lot of growth weakness, to really have labor market weakness which would then feed into inflation coming lower.”

WSJ : Goldman Sachs Collects $4 Billion for Infrastructure Deals

Goldman Sachs Collects $4 Billion for Infrastructure Deals
The asset manager raised $1.5 billion more than for a predecessor vehicle as investors sought to cash in on decarbonization and digital transformation trends

Goldman Sachs Group’s asset management business has collected $4 billion to invest in midsize infrastructure assets, as investors look to take advantage of a favorable political and economic climate for the sector.

Goldman Sachs Asset Management closed West Street Infrastructure Partners IV at the fund’s target and has already committed $2.3 billion across eight investments, the New York-based manager said. Goldman Sachs oversaw a total of more than $2.7 trillion in assets as of June 30.

So far investments in the new fund include Synthica Energy, a Cincinnati-based developer of renewable gas plants, Verdalia Bioenergy, a developer and operator of European biomethane plants, and Gridstor, a developer and operator of utility-grade battery storage projects in the U.S., Goldman said.

The new fund attracted capital mainly from institutional investors, with the balance made up by high-net-worth investors, Goldman and its employees, the bank said. The fund’s predecessor, West Street Infrastructure Partners III, closed in 2017 with $2.5 billion, a spokesman confirmed.

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

Private Equity

Private Equity news, analysis and insights from WSJ's global team of reporters and editors.


SUBSCRIBE
Goldman said it is investing the fund across infrastructure subsectors that include energy transition, digital infrastructure, transport, logistics and social infrastructure.

The infrastructure asset class stands to benefit from broad economic trends, including the transition to a lower-carbon economy, digital transformation and shifting demographics, “each of which requires very significant mobilization of private capital,” said Goldman’s Co-Head of Infrastructure Scott Lebovitz in a statement announcing the close of the fund.

Private infrastructure investors in the U.S. also stand to benefit from a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure law passed in 2021 to repair the nation’s aging roads and bridges, upgrade the electrical grid and expand broadband internet access.

Around $7.8 billion had been invested across 1,462 projects since the law was enacted in November 2021, according to data published by the Department of the Interior.

Goldman is looking to use the new fund to back what are called value-add infrastructure investments, namely businesses with long-term cash flows and strong market positions, and that deliver assets and services viewed as critical to society.

Value-added investing involves acquiring assets and growing their revenues through investment and operational improvements. It is a higher-risk and higher-returning strategy than core infrastructure, which targets assets such as utilities in developed countries with long-term supply contracts already in place.

Goldman’s infrastructure investment team has deployed approximately $16 billion since inception in 2006, the bank said. The team is led by Lebovitz, Global Co-Head Tavis Cannell and Chief Investment Officer, Infrastructure Philippe Camu.

TechCrunch : Reliance nears deal to acquire Disney’s India business, report says

Reliance nears deal to acquire Disney’s India business, report says

Reliance is nearing a deal to acquire Disney’s India business, according to a report, as Mukesh Ambani’s oil-to-telecom empire eyes broadening digital and television assets.

Disney values its India business at about $10 billion, whereas Reliance views the assets at between $7 billion to $8 billion, the Monday Bloomberg News report said. A deal could be finalized and announced as early as next month, the report said.

Reliance in an earlier statement said the firm is always evaluating properties for acquisitions.

In 2019, Disney acquired 21st Century Fox’s entertainment assets for $71.3 billion, a move significantly bolstered by the inclusion of Star India.

The deal was integral to Disney’s global streaming expansion, handing it broadcast and streaming rights to the Indian Premier League cricket matches, a multitude of multilingual TV channels, and an interest in a Bollywood film production company. At the time of acquisition, Star’s Hotstar had amassed about 150 million monthly active users.

While Hotstar dominated the Indian video streaming landscape for several more quarters, things have tapered off since as Reliance-backed Viacom18 has grown in popularity after securing the five-year rights to stream IPL cricket matches for about $3 billion. Disney paid $3 billion for the same five-year right, but for broadcasting the content on TV.

Reliance has poached many top leaders and engineering talent to ramp up JioCinema in the last one year, and has populated the on-demand streaming service with premium content from HBO and NBC.

Disney’s Hotstar, which has lost about 20 million subscribers this year as consumers flocked to JioCinema to watch IPL matches, is currently streaming the ongoing cricket World Cup to mobile viewers at no cost, hoping to win back customers. It reclaimed the global on-demand video streaming record earlier this month from JioCinema, when the Disney streamer app drew 35 million concurrent viewers to a cricket match. It broke its own record Sunday during a game between India and New Zealand, when the concurrent viewers jumped to 43 million.

FT : Solar company Sunnova warns of looming energy crisis

FT : Solar company Sunnova warns of looming energy crisis
CEO John Berger’s comments come as shares of renewable energy companies fall because of high interest rates

US solar power has become critical to avert a looming energy crisis, the head of a large rooftop solar installer has said, even as shares in renewable energy companies continue to plummet this month.

“I do feel like we are headed to an energy crisis of some sort,” either in the oil business or power business, John Berger, chief executive of Sunnova, told the Financial Times.

“Privately, very privately, some utilities are realising that, to meet the demands of electric vehicles and electrification, power companies like us are necessary. That they cannot do it all,” Berger said.

Sunnova’s share price closed down 5.9 per cent on Friday to $8.67, its lowest level since March 2020. Other big solar companies Sunrun and SunPower closed at lows not seen since the initial days of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

“The share price is bad,” Berger acknowledged. 

The tumble comes as higher interest rates have driven up the cost of renewables financing and threaten to undermine the price cuts from the subsidies in President Joe Biden’s climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Houston-based Sunnova partners with solar panel companies and then leases equipment to homeowners, or sells to homeowners in power purchase agreements. It also securitises solar loans and sells them to investors.

In September, the US energy department finalised a $3bn partial guarantee for Sunnova’s solar loans. On Thursday, Sunnova priced $244mn of solar notes, its first with the DoE’s partial guarantees.

Berger said shareholders have not appreciated Sunnova’s ability to increase prices as the costs of solar equipment fall. In the third quarter of 2023, North American solar prices rose 4 per cent from the prior three months and were up 21 per cent year-over-year, according to a report from pricing provider LevelTen.

Prices for solar components have fallen from their record highs last year. Polysilicon spot prices dropped about 70 per cent from mid-April to mid-July, the energy department said in an August report. And solar module prices have fallen as well amid oversupply and slumping prices for certain commodities, it said.

Lower solar equipment costs have helped offset higher financing costs, Berger said. Simultaneously, the company is able to raise its prices for solar power.

Rooftop solar is expected to grow just 9 per cent this year, down from record annual growth of 40 per cent last year, as the higher cost of financing squeezes homeowners out of the market and incentives in California, the largest market for rooftop solar, are slashed, according to a report from Wood Mackenzie and the Solar Energy Industries Association. The report said the segment would not recover to the same levels of growth as previous years. 

“People are reassessing project economics,” said Michelle Davis, global head of solar at Wood Mackenzie, an energy consultancy.

“Interest rates increase just the general cost of capital . . . If your costs go up, then that production tax credit doesn’t go as far.” 

The troubles facing the residential solar industry highlight the conflicting goals of the Biden administration, as the Federal Reserve’s effort to tame inflation by raising interest rates risks undermining the US plan to rapidly deploy renewable energy as it increases financing costs.

Rooftop solar, compared to utility-scale solar, is more likely to be financed by loans and is vulnerable to interest rate increases. The technology gives homeowners more control over their power sources, relieves stress from the grid, and can help speed up the pace of renewable deployment due to faster permitting timelines.

“The macroeconomic challenges in the economy have made the residential solar business grow slower this year than last year,” said Peter Faricy, chief executive of residential solar giant SunPower, which reported a net loss of $30mn last quarter and lowered its 2023 forecast by 20 per cent.

“We would all like to see it grow faster, not just because we’re in the business of it, but because of the impact it has on the environment.”