>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • No major mover
MDAX:
  • Nemetschek (NEM TH) +4.9%
    • Nemetschek Results Defy Slowdown Concerns, Morgan Stanley Says
  • Puma (PUM TH) +3.1%
    • Puma 3Q Gross Profit Margin Beats Estimates
  • Duerr (DUE TH) -0.8%
    • Duerr Cut to Hold at HSBC; PT 22 euros
  • Delivery Hero (DHER TH) -1%
  • Hensoldt (HAG TH) -1.3%
SDAX:
  • 1&1 (DRI TH) +2.2%
  • Deutsche PBB (PBB TH) +1.7%
  • flatexDEGIRO (FTK TH) +1.4%
    • flatexDEGIRO Raised to Outperform at KBW; PT 12.50 euros
  • Heidelberger Druck (HDD TH) +1.3%
  • Adtran Holdings (QH9 TH) -2.7%

WWD : Investment Bankers on the Future of Fashion Dealmaking

Investment Bankers on the Future of Fashion Dealmaking
After a surprisingly strong run of acquisitions and IPOs, WWD asks the experts to weigh in on what comes next.

Fashion’s dealmakers awoke with a jolt this summer.

Kering inked deals with Creed and Valentino, Tapestry Inc. agreed to buy rival Capri Holdings, Kim Kardashian’s Skims raised new money ahead of a potential IPO and Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus started talking, again.

As fall arrived, Sycamore Partners continued its move to consolidate with its agreement to buy Chico’s FAS Inc., Birkenstock staged its much anticipated initial public offering and more.

It was altogether a lot of activity — especially for a time when economists were projecting recession and belt tightening.

But the economic storm clouds haven’t passed. Inflation lingers, interest rates are high and wars are raging, on top of all the usual complications of running and growing major fashion companies or even smaller designer brands.

Still, more players are said to be looking at the market — plotting IPOs next year or their own transformative transaction.

To take the measure of what comes next, WWD reached out to the investment bankers who match buyers and sellers. While their answers reflect a still-complicated market and opinions vary, the question was simple:

Will the deal market keep heating up in fashion? Why?

Ben Frost, global co-head of consumer retail group, Goldman Sachs

We are going to continue to see more deals in fashion and apparel. The benefits of scale have proven to be too great to ignore and shifting consumer impulses create opportunities for some and challenges for others.

Carmen Molinos, global co-head of consumer retail investment banking, Morgan Stanley

Despite a slow first half of the year for overall M&A activity, we have seen a recent wave of luxury consolidation and expect this trend to continue. Scale matters in luxury, and it is all the more important in times of economic uncertainty and an escalating cost environment. I expect strategics to continue to utilize M&A as a tool to bolster long-term growth by diversifying their portfolios to deepen customer engagement, enhance core competencies and expand geographic reach.

Further, even if more expensive, access to debt financing is improving and would therefore expect sidelined financial sponsors to become increasingly more active. Scarcity of actionable opportunities have maintained elevated valuations, and buyers and sellers are utilizing creative solutions to bridge value gaps. I therefore expect luxury to continue to be fertile ground for M&A activity.

Alexandra Soto, chief operating officer, Lazard

It is a real paradox. The fashion industry’s M&A environment is experiencing numerous conflicting trends, with certain factors promoting deal activity and others hindering it leading to significant polarization of interest.

Recent examples of M&A activity in the fashion industry underscore how strategic players, faced with financial challenges and shareholder pressure, have been compelled to reevaluate their brand and category portfolios, as well as their overall strategies. The consolidation trend in this sector began long ago, as large groups built portfolios of fashion and luxury brands to benefit from scale, making it increasingly difficult for independent brands to compete, both digitally and physically in-store experience.

This year, new dynamics have emerged impacting M&A valuation: The impact of inflation on margins, underperformance of some online and physical retailers prompting questions about the optimal distribution mix, softening demand in China, de-globalization of the supply chain among others. With these new challenges come new needs, and recent deal activity demonstrates that the group concept allows for greater agility in responding to a rapidly changing environment.

David Shiffman, partner and co-head of the consumer retail group, Solomon Partners

The retail sector has been oversold for way too long. Private equity has given up on the sector fearing the “Amazon effect” and the concentration of power of the top 20 retailers. Solomon Partners has written for several years about the top 20 retailers and their size, scale, fortress balance sheets, lower cost of capital and ability to attract talent — all resulting in a concentration of market capitalizations.

Strategics have been focused on organic growth as they have battled over an extended period of time. And brand management companies flourished and became the buyer of choice for many fashion brand businesses. These transactions range from tens of millions to billions of dollars.

Great businesses, with many years left to run, have been overlooked. We anticipate that there will be more branded apparel, footwear and accessory businesses that are sold or IPO’d. Luxury and branded goods businesses that command higher price points resulting in higher margins will be the most attractive.

The rapid shifts in consumer preferences as a result of social media have never been higher. And the connection between brand and customer has never been more important than where we stand today.

Elsa Berry, managing director and founder, Vendôme Global Partners

The luxury fashion industry should see more consolidation as scale has become increasingly vital and competition continues to intensify.

However, there are not that many sizable potential targets left. In addition, many small- to medium-sized companies are either struggling or not growing very fast. And many designer-owned companies may not want to lose their independence and become absorbed by a larger multibrand company.

So, the supply side is limited.

And the buy side is becoming concerned with the softening performance of the luxury industry post the pandemic-created bubble: slowdown in the U.S. and in Europe, with disappointing growth in China, and a very volatile macro-economic and political environment.

Numerous uncertainties (high interest rates, still-high inflation, wars, uncertain election outcomes, consumers’ softening demand, companies worsening performances, etc.) create a lack of visibility and a negative investment context.

More recently, the Birkenstock IPO met an unenthusiastic reception, with its share price dipping almost 13 percent in its Wall Street debut, despite stellar performance, scale and significant brand value.

Hence, I don’t feel that the fashion M&A market will be robust in the short term — putting aside distressed situations.

William Susman, managing director, Threadstone

In general, I do believe the fashion and apparel deal market is heating up. More a soft opening than a crush of deals.

The market is opening up for a couple of macro reasons. The effects of the pandemic are completely behind us. And while the retail environment is challenging, it is for different, more traditional reasons — consumer demand, rising interest rates and consumer confidence.

Good companies always can get a deal done. And that means strong brands with scale and profitability can find a buyer albeit at a price. This is not a stretch market — it is a balanced one.

The Tapestry-Capri deal and the Kering-Valentino deal are reflective of strong companies with strong brands looking to grow entering into smart financial transactions. A potential Neiman’s-Saks deal would fit into this dynamic if it materializes. These sectors — accessories and luxury — remain coveted. The consumer never has enough shoes and bags and the rich are still rich.

While the market for deals has opened, I see it being selective, not across all areas of retail. Seller expectations need to remain grounded. Buyers are valuing actual earnings, not adjusted run-rates. And leverage needs to be very limited.

WWD : On a Roll: Swiss Running Brand On Holding Has Been on Fire

On a Roll: Swiss Running Brand On Holding Has Been on Fire
The Zurich-based company was founded in 2010 and went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2021.

It all started with a garden hose.

Retired professional triathlete Olivier Bernhard wanted to create a running shoe with a totally new feel. So he cut up pieces of garden hose and glued them to a prototype shoe. He approached his friends David Allemann and Caspar Coppetti and together, they designed shoe with an explosive takeoff and a cushioned landing, or what they describe as “running on clouds.”

The shoe won the ISPO BrandNew Award in March 2010 and it was off to the races for the Zurich-based On Holding.

Since then, On has managed to carve out a niche in the highly competitive running shoe market with its Cloud franchise of footwear. The brand quickly became the top-selling running shoe in Switzerland. Then, tennis superstar Roger Federer made an investment into the company and helped it move into the tennis space.

In 2021, On Holding went public on the New York Stock Exchange, providing further financial fuel to its fiery growth.

On is now found in 9,800 points of sale in more than 60 countries, and in its first full year as a public company, posted net income of 57.7 million Swiss francs with net sales rising 68.7 percent to 1.22 billion Swiss francs, the company reported in March of this year.

As the team gathered in Times Square to celebrate the IPO, they looked up at a billboard that read: Dream On. As Martin Hoffmann, co-chief executive officer and chief financial officer, said during an investors conference at its Zurich headquarters earlier this month: “It was very clear, hey, we are no longer outsiders. People see the value that we create. They understand we are here for the long term. We have a winning team. We are not going away.”

And the company’s projections for the future are even more robust. At the investors conference, On said it intends to double its projected 2023 net sales and increase its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization margin to 18 percent by 2026.

On is estimating net sales of 1.76 billion Swiss francs for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, with a gross profit margin of at least 58.5 percent and 15 percent adjusted EBITDA margin. Its projections will bring sales to at least 3.55 billion Swiss francs, reflecting a compounded annual growth rate of more than 26 percent, a gross profit margin of more than 60 percent and an adjusted EBITDA of more than 18 percent by 2026, the company projected.

It’s for these reasons that the company is being awarded the WWD Honor for Best-Performing Fashion/Retail Company, Large Cap.

While its growth may be explosive, the company has been steadfast in its mission since Day One. As it describes on its website: “At On, we don’t believe it’s the human body that determines whether you cross the finish line, reach the peak or dare to dream the big idea — it’s the human spirit. Our innovations and actions are shaped by our mission: to ignite the human spirit through movement.”

The company outlined the three pillars that will mark its future growth. First is to increase its market share in running along with its brand awareness, its performance credibility and its sustainability impact.

Marc Maurer, co-CEO, said brand awareness is highest in Switzerland, where 47 percent of respondents to a recent survey knew the brand. In the U.S., that number is 9 percent, but in cities with strong running communities, that figure is higher. In Miami, for example, On has a 15 percent market share among runners, and in New York, it’s 7 percent.

These numbers will be lifted by continuing to grow its following on social channels, he added. He said since the IPO, On’s Instagram, TikTok and other social channel followers grew by 94 percent.

At the same time, On will work to expand its international footprint by increasing its “premium multichannel distribution” and its own retail presence as well as its footprint in China.

During the investor conference, Hoffmann said On will continue to focus on expanding its own retail and e-commerce along with its wholesale presence. Since the pandemic, 20 new markets have been added and a relaunch of its website has led to a ninefold increase in members.

In terms of retail, at the time of the IPO, the company operated only one store in New York City and seven in China. By the end of this year, that number will be 30 — 22 in China and 10 in other countries, Maurer said. That will include Portland, Ore., Miami, Paris and Spitalfields in London.

Britt Olsen, general manager for the Americas and head of global commercial strategy, detailed the benefits of each channel. E-commerce, she said, is “where we can really bring the most expressive and digitally scalable version of ourselves to the world.” Brick-and-mortar retail “is a place where we really have the opportunity to build our most intimate touchpoint,” and wholesale is “where we can scale and amplify what we’re trying to achieve.”

The retail expansion will be centered around distinct operating models, she said: flagship stores on high streets with high volume; “chapter stores,” focused on building communities in a particular location, and a “commercial format,” or mall-based locations, “where we can scale a bit faster.”

Going forward, 10 percent of new stores will be flagships with the remainder split evenly between chapter and commercial units, she said.

But regardless of the format, retail stores have proven to be a key growth vehicle for On. Olsen said when the London store opened, “we saw baseline and e-comm traffic increase by three times. We also heard of a really great spillover effect in our wholesale channels in these markets.”

And apparel has been a major beneficiary. “We know that in this channel, apparel works for On,” she said. “We have some stores where there’s actually 30 percent apparel share. So when it is merchandised right, and in a very design-driven On way, we know that this has an ability to connect with consumers. And on the very human basis, it’s actually a really great testing ground for us to get feedback directly from consumers for our apparel category.”

Turning to product, Hoffmann said performance and sustainability continue to be the drivers for the company. He pointed to the Cloud Neo, the first fully circular performance running shoe, as a key innovation and there are “many more things in the pipeline.”

He also said it was important to expand On’s overall product offering in order to reach more consumers. Today, the assortment ranges from shoes for running, tennis and training to “all-day” shoes. And price ranges have also been broadened with a focus on higher prices, which “will allow us to become more profitable and further fuel the aspirational quality of being the most premium sports brand out there,” Coppetti said.

Over the past 18 months, the company has launched the Cloud Runner, Cloud Monster and Cloud Surfer, three new running shoe models, that now account for roughly half of its sales. “Now building on these successes, we will start to consolidate our technologies, all our products in running into very clear product franchise brands with a view of getting brand name recognition for these brands and enabling our fans to self-select the right products for them,” Coppetti said.

In the stores, apparel and footwear will be merchandised together for specific consumer segments, leading to a better experience, and hopefully, higher sales.

On Nov. 2, the company will introduce Cloud Eclipse, a max cushioning product, to address that end of the market. And the company will be putting more emphasis on training products that can “transition seamlessly from studio to street,” Coppetti said.

Although On has limited the number of collaborations it has offered, it has worked with Loewe on shoes and apparel, a capsule that has been highly successful.

Beyond running, the company will aim to further establish select adjacencies in tennis and other sports while beefing up its offering of “full head-to-toe looks across all its verticals,” it has said.

“We have an exciting product pipeline that includes running, training and tennis footwear and apparel,” Hoffmann said.

Coppetti said apparel will play a big role in On’s future. “For every footwear piece sold in training, there are about 10 apparel pieces. We will focus on the most premium materials as well as the Swiss engineered details and clever features to cater to new aspirational consumers.”

Maurer stressed that in footwear and apparel, On continues to view itself as “an innovation company at heart. We’re not just here to make shoes or apparel. We’re pioneering technology and products the world hasn’t really seen before or creating new sensations and removing barriers.”

He said the company works closely with its athlete partners to create quality products to meet their needs. In addition to Federer, it works with Poland’s Iga Świątek, the world’s number-one-ranked women’s tennis player, Ben Shelton, a rising American star on the court, Boston marathon winner Hellen Obiri, as well as triathletes Gustav Iden, Kristian Blummenfelt, Paula Findlay and Chelsea Sodaro. “We develop products together with them. They have become part of who we are, and I think we’ve become part of who they are. And that has really led to some amazing achievements,” Maurer said, pointing to Obiri’s marathon win as an example.

Looking to the future, On’s ambitions are lofty but its team is confident of its continued success. Maurer summed it up this way: “On aspires to be the most important premium global sportswear brand, rooted in innovation, design and sustainability. It’s very calculated. We’re very clear on what we’re doing, and we’re doing it because we want to be super successful in 10 years from now. We’re not building for 2026. We’re building far beyond that.”

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 24th of October 2023

>>> Up
* Airtel Africa Raised to Buy at Citi; PT 140 pence
* Alpha Services Raised to Outperform at Mediobanca SpA
* Altri Raised to Neutral at Oddo BHF; PT 5.10 euros
* First Quantum Minerals Raised to Buy at Paradigm Capital
* flatexDEGIRO Raised to Outperform at KBW; PT 12.50 euros
* Golden Ocean Raised to Buy at Jefferies; PT 121.66 kroner
* Ingersoll Rand Raised to Buy at Stifel; PT $73
* Lundin Mining Raised to Buy at Paradigm Capital; PT C$12.50
* Rio Tinto Raised to Overweight at Barclays; PT 6,300 pence
* Tomra Raised to Hold at Jefferies; PT 90 kroner
* Wulff-Group Raised to Reduce at Inderes; PT 2 euros

>>> Down
* Absolent Air Care Group Cut to Hold at Nordea
* Equinor Cut to Hold at Nordea
* Getinge Cut to Hold at ABG; PT 203 kronor
* Hess Cut to Equal-Weight at Wells Fargo; PT $171
* Millicom GDRs Cut to Hold at ABG; PT 175 kronor
* Navigator Co Cut to Underperform at Oddo BHF; PT 3.90 euros

>>> Initiation
* Devolver Digital Rated New Buy at Peel Hunt; PT 35 pence
* Entra Reinstated Buy at SEB Equities; PT 180 kroner
* Nokia Rated New Buy at Commerzbank
* Solaria Energia Rated New Neutral at CaixaBank BPI
* Swissquote Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT 217 Swiss francs

>>> Call
* Nemetschek Results Defy Slowdown Concerns, Morgan Stanley Says
* Swissquote Gets New Buy at Berenberg on Attractive Valuation
* Talanx Outlook Boost Shows Improving Strength: Morgan Stanley
* Tomra Raised to Hold at Jefferies, Downside Risks Now Minimized

>>> What to look at today - 24th of October 2023

Chinese stocks outperformed Asian equities after the nation’s sovereign wealth fund bought exchange-traded funds to shore up the market. Treasuries stabilized following a volatile session on Monday.  Asian shares were mixed after the lowest S&P 500 close since May, with equities paring declines of more than 1% in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong. Oil eked out a gain as the next stage of the Israel-Hamas war remained unclear.  The rebound in Chinese equities “shows that while it may still be too early to call a bottom, the authorities are making it a rule to step on the brakes whenever there looks like there’s overwhelming downward momentum,” said Raymond Chen, fund manager at Zizhou Investment Asset Management. “This does help somewhat ease the panic, assuring investors that the nation will continue offering support if it drops further.”  The CSI 300 Index was little changed, while gauges in Shanghai and Shenzhen rose.  Treasury 10-year yields were steady, as some of the market’s most prominent bears said the historic rout in US government bonds had gone too far. Yields slumped on Monday after hitting 5%, amid volatility fueled by expectations the Federal Reserve will keep rates elevated and the government will boost bond sales to cover widening deficits.  A gauge of the dollar retreated, giving a boost to emerging Asian currencies such as the Thai baht, South Korea’s won and the Malaysian ringgit. Oil edged higher in Asia trading after dropping the most since Hamas’ attack on Israel as Tel Aviv was seen holding off on an invasion of Gaza amid hostage negotiations, containing the conflict for the time being. There are growing calls inside the country to rethink the scope of a ground invasion of Gaza. China reiterated that Israel must protect civilians even as it has the right to defend itself in a conflict. In Japan, the central bank announced an unscheduled bond-purchase operation on Tuesday, underscoring its desire to curb the speed of increases in sovereign yields. The Topix benchmark dropped to the lowest since June after Nidec, a key supplier to the tech and electric vehicle industries, plunged over 10% on disappointing quarterly earnings.  Elsewhere, billionaire investor Bill Ackman wrote in a social media post that he unwound his bet against US government bonds amid rising global risks. Bill Gross, co-founder of Pacific Investment Management Co., wrote that he’s buying short-dated interest-rate futures in anticipation of a recession by year-end. US After Hours AGYS +10.2%, CR +5.6%, MEDP +5% on earnings; TBI -12.3%, HXL -7.7%, AAN -6.9% down on earnings.

Nikkei +0.36% Hang Seng -0.91% CSI -0.21% Shanghai +0.22% Shenzen +0.68%

Eur$ 1.0679 CNH 7.3093 CNY 7.3035 JPY 149.66 GBP 1.2266 CHF 0.8906 RUB 94.56 TRY 28.0852 WTI$ 85.93 Gold 1,976 +0.18% BTC 34,415 +9.15% ETH 1,823 +6.69%

S&P +0.30% Nasdaq +0.46% EuroStoxx -0.03% FTSE -0.11% Dax +0.08% SMI +0.12%

Macro :
- BITCOIN EXTENDS JUMP, HITS $35,000 FOR FIRST TIME SINCE 2022
- Bill Gross Is Buying SOFR Futures, Sees Recession By Year End
- JPMorgan’s Kolanovic Says Tightening to Be Felt ‘Well Into 2024’
- Citi’s Montagu Says Traders Boosted Short Positions in Equities
- JPM Asset Likes High-Yield Bonds, Neutral on Stocks: Laskowitz
- EU Utilities Have 2023 Consensus in Their Sights, 2024 Trickier
- Corn and Soy Extend Losses; Palm Oil Drops

Keep an eye on :
- AAD GY : Amadeus Fire Sees FY Operating Ebita +7% to +9%
- ADM LN : Ferrari Insurance Still Looks Cheap Even After UK Price Surge
- AJAX NA : Ajax Head Coach Leaves Club After Weekend Defeat (Oct. 23)
- ARM LN : Nvidia, Arm to develop chips based on Arm technology: report
- BORR NO : Borr Drilling Intends to Offer $1.5b Senior Notes Due 2028, 2030, Contemplates Offer of $50 Million Shares
- BRG NO : Borregaard 3Q Pretax Profit Beats Estimates
- CNA LN : Worst Still to Come for Energy Debts, British Gas Boss Fears
- CVX US : Guyana Government ‘Very Supportive’ of Chevron Deal, Hess Says
- CVX US : Hess to Pay $1.72B Breakup Fee if Chevron Deal Fails
- DSV DC : DSV 3Q Adjusted Net Income Misses Estimates
- EQV1V FH : eQ 3Q Operating Profit Misses Estimates
- ERF FP : Eurofins Scientific 3Q Core Business Organic Revenue Beats Est.
- EXO NA : Juventus FC Board Approves up to €200m Proposed Capital Boost
- FDP LN : FD Technologies Cuts FY Adjusted Ebitda Forecast
- GALE SW : Galenica Sees Net Sales Growing by 3% to 5% in Next Few Years
- RMS FP : Hermes 3Q Sales at Constant Exchange Rates Beats Estimates
- HUBN SW : Huber+Suhner 9M Orders CHF639.2M Vs. CHF757.0M Y/y
- IBE SM : Iberdrola Agrees to Sell 49% of UK Wind Farm to Masdar: Cinco
- IDIA SW : Idorsia Boosts FY Operating Loss Forecast
- INWI SS : Inwido 3Q Net Sales Beats Estimates
- ITP FP : Inter Parfums 3Q Net Sales Beats Estimates, Interparfums 3Q Sales EU214.6M Vs. EU195.3M Y/y
- JUVE IM : Juventus FC Board Approves up to €200m Proposed Capital Boost
- KEMIRA FH : Kemira 3Q Oper Ebitda Beats Estimates
- LRE SM : Lar Espana RE Socimi's MSCI ESG Rating Lowered to BB from BBB
- LOGN SW : Logitech 2Q Sales Beat, Strong Margin Welcome
- MTRS SS : Munters 3Q Ebit Beats Estimates
- NEM GY : Nemetschek Boosts FY Revenue Forecast
- NEM GY : Nemetschek Results Defy Slowdown Concerns, Morgan Stanley Says
- NHY NO ; Norsk Hydro 3Q Adjusted Ebitda Misses Estimates
- NUE US : Nucor Sees Weaker Q4 Earnings Due to Lower Pricing
- NOVN SW : Novartis 3Q Beovu Sales Misses Estimates, Novartis Raises FY Core Operating Profit Growth Forecast
- ORA FP : Orange Confident Masmovil Deal Will be Approved by Year End
- RAND NA : Randstad 3Q Organic Revenue Misses Estimates
- RNO FP : France Mulls Subsidy of Up to €13,000 for Leased EVs: Les Echos
- RR/ LN : Griffin Global, Bain Capital to Buy 17 Rolls-Royce Engines
- SDZ SW : Sandoz Group 9M Net Sales $7.1B
- SIGN SW : SIG Group 3Q Adjusted Ebitda Misses Estimates
- STLAM IM : UAW Strikes Stellantis’ Michigan Truck Plant; 6,800 Walk Out
- STRA1V FH : Stora Enso 3Q Operating Ebit Misses Estimates
- TLX GY : Talanx Boosts FY Net Income Forecast
- THRU LN : Pentland to Invest in Thruvision via Subscription
- UCG IM : UniCredit 3Q Net Income Beats Estimates, Raises FY Outlook
- UCG IM : UniCredit Won’t Pay Italy Windfall Tax, Opts for Get-Out Clause
- UCG IM : *UNICREDIT CEO SAYS 'PREMATURE' TO LIFT FY NET GUIDANCE
- VAR NO : Var Energi 3Q Net Income Misses Estimates
- VPLAYB SS : Viaplay Delays 3Q Results Due to Continuing Discussions
- VIRP FP : Virbac SACA Boosts FY Adj. Current Oper Income Margin Forecast
- WIHL SS : Wihlborgs 3Q Rental Income Meets Estimates
- WPP LN : WPP Fires Executive Detained in China After Police Raid

FT : IEA warns energy companies against banking on strong oil demand

IEA warns energy companies against banking on strong oil demand
Risks stemming from over-investment in fossil fuels have ‘evolved’, says energy watchdog

The International Energy Agency expects demand for oil to fall by almost half by 2050 if governments follow through on pledges to clean up energy supply, warning that oil and gas investments are no longer “safe or secure” for countries or consumers.

Fatih Birol, the head of the west’s energy watchdog, said the energy crisis triggered by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, rising tensions in the Middle East, and record temperatures this year demonstrated the risk of continuing to rely on fossil fuels. The remarks come as the IEA publishes its annual World Energy Outlook report.

Birol was unapologetic about his longstanding call for new oil and gas investments to end, despite growing animosity from many producers in the sector, from energy executives in the US to the Opec cartel.

“Looking at the world today or tomorrow, no one can convince me that oil and gas represent safe or secure energy choices for countries and consumers worldwide,” Birol told the Financial Times.

Birol’s comments come after the second supersized oil deal this month, with Chevron agreeing to buy Hess for $53bn on Monday following ExxonMobil’s purchase of Pioneer, in a clear bet by two of the largest western oil and gas producers on the longevity of fossil fuels.

Chevron chief executive Mike Wirth criticised the IEA directly for forecasting fossil fuel demand will peak before the end of this decade, saying he did not think it was “remotely right”.

Asked about the deals, Birol said “larger-scale fossil fuel investments” not only posed a “risk for our climate but also have some business risks as the world may not need an increase of oil production”.

The IEA said in its report that risks stemming from over-investment in fossil fuels have “evolved” as governments sought to bolster energy security following the war in Ukraine, including by increasing investment in liquefied natural gas to replace Russian flows.

While “an unprecedented surge” in new LNG projects from 2025 would ease concerns about supply, the prospect of over-investment means “the fears expressed by some large resource-holders and certain oil and gas companies that the world is underinvesting in oil and gas supply are no longer based on the latest technology”.

As reported by the FT in September, the IEA’s 2023 report is its first annual outlook to project that global oil, natural gas and coal demand will all see a peak before 2030.

According to the IEA’s latest scenarios, which are based on government policies and proposals, it expects oil demand to drop to 92.5mn barrels per day by 2030 and 54.8mn b/d by 2050, if all pledges announced by governments are met. Oil demand rose above 100mn b/d for the first time in 2019.

But the IEA’s scenarios also paint a more troubling picture for the environment if governments fail to follow through on pledges and stick with existing policies, showing oil demand would barely fall by 2050, declining to just 97.4mn b/d.

Opec earlier this month forecast oil demand would rise to 116mn b/d by 2045, in a sign of the stark divergence between producers and the IEA.

If all government pledges are met, the IEA believes “unabated” fossil fuels’ share of global energy supply in 2050 will amount to just 32 per cent, compared with 80 per cent in 2022.

Renewables, biomass, nuclear, and coal and gas generation where carbon emissions are captured and stored would make up 66 per cent of global energy generation.

The body hailed progress and investment in clean energy that have put renewables on course to power this transition. However, government policies needed to become far more ambitious to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, the critical threshold of the 2015 Paris agreement.

Global emissions are still set to remain high enough to push up global average temperatures by about 2.4 degrees Celsius this century, the IEA said, leading to “very widespread and severe impacts from climate change”.

The prospect of exceeding the 1.5 degrees Celsius target would make the upcoming COP28 climate conference in the UAE “maybe as important” as the 2015 meeting where the target was agreed, Birol said.

Under the IEA’s most ambitious “net zero” scenario, which could allow the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit to be maintained, unabated fossil fuels would make up only 12 per cent of global energy demand by 2050.

Referencing wars involving Ukraine and Israel, he said: “The biggest challenge is fragmentation.”

FT : The region at the heart of Germany’s economic stagnation

The region at the heart of Germany’s economic stagnation
Facing higher energy costs and the transition to electric vehicles, once prosperous industrial districts are struggling to adapt

Bernd Hofmann founded his engineering firm 56 years ago. He’s seen many ups and downs since then — the oil price shock of the 1970s, the upheaval of German reunification in 1990, the global financial crisis of 2008. But nothing like this.

“It’s one of the worst phases I’ve ever experienced,” the 80-year-old says.

Hofmann’s company Femeg, which makes water meters, safety valves and precision parts for the car and chemical industries, is the victim of a downturn that is raising serious doubts about the future of the country’s much-vaunted, export-led business model.

Germany’s economy is stuck in a rut. Its exports and manufacturing output are in decline, inflation is suppressing consumer demand and the construction industry is reeling from high interest rates.

Business leaders are sounding the alarm. Virtually “every European economy is growing, apart from Germany’s”, says Rainer Dulger, head of the BDA, the country’s main employers’ organisation. “That’s a clear signal we have to act.”

Indeed, the IMF predicted this month that Germany would be the worst-performing major economy this year, with GDP set to shrink by 0.5 per cent. It cited slower demand from its trading partners and weakness in sectors that are sensitive to high interest rates. In contrast, the US economy is forecast to grow by 2.1 per cent and France’s by 1.0 per cent.

Experts are clear on why Germany is facing such a uniquely grim outlook. It took a much bigger hit from last year’s surge in energy prices than many other large economies, partly because it has so many big gas-guzzling manufacturing firms. The ECB tightening monetary policy to tackle inflation has also taken its toll, as has a sluggish recovery in trade with China, Berlin’s biggest trading partner.

Robert Habeck, economy minister, admitted earlier this month that Germany was emerging from the crisis “more slowly than we expected”.

But some of the challenges the country faces are more long-term. Companies increasingly complain about the rising cost of doing business in Germany — the burden of climate policies, high taxes and expensive energy. They point to the dire shortage of skilled workers and excessive bureaucracy.

“We’re talking to the government about artificial intelligence and in their offices they still all have fax machines,” says Dulger. “It just doesn’t fit.”

Meanwhile the rise of electric vehicles — and China’s advances in the EV market in Europe — threaten an industry that was long a pillar of Germany’s economic success.

Nowhere is this process more evident than in the district of southwestern Germany where Femeg and a clutch of other medium-sized engineering companies are based. A recent survey by the think-tank IW Consult identified Donnersbergkreis, named after the eponymous mountain that dominates the surrounding landscape, as one of the most challenged regions in Germany.

The researchers looked at the two big transformations currently under way in the country: the shift to a carbon neutral economy, which will put pressure on energy-intensive and high carbon-emission industries such as steelmaking and chemicals; and the switch to electric cars.

They found that six of Germany’s 400 districts and towns would be particularly hit by these processes, and Donnersbergkreis was one of them.

For Bernd Hofmann, a reckoning is coming. “[The government] always told people here ‘we’re the best, the biggest, the greatest, and the sun will never set,” he says. “For years, the only way was up. And we fell into a kind of lethargy. [ . . .] The next few years are going to be tough for all manufacturers.”

‘All the lights will go out here.’
If there is a poster child for Donnersbergkreis’ economic woes, it is BorgWarner, a US-based car parts maker currently in the throes of a massive restructuring.

The company’s factory in Kirchheimbolanden, the regional centre of Donnersbergkreis, specialises in turbochargers, small turbines that force more air into a car engine’s combustion chamber to produce more power. It is the town’s biggest employer.


The company was long a market leader in the device. But demand has been declining for years, says Andreas Denne, head of BorgWarner Turbo Systems. The first blow was the Volkswagen emissions scandal of 2015, which, he says, caused a “collapse in the diesel market”. Then came the “whole discussion around electric cars”.

Initially BorgWarner hoped its prized gizmos still had a future; they could, after all, be deployed in so-called “mild hybrids”, which use a traditional combustion engine alongside a 48-volt battery. They also hoped conventional petrol and diesel engines might hold up for years to come.

The EU dashed those hopes with their decision to ban new vehicles with petrol and diesel engines by 2035. BorgWarner has since announced plans to cut the workforce at Kirchheimbolanden from about 1,600 in 2021 to 650 by 2028.

“For years we were used to growth, growth, growth,” says Denne. “From here we sent turbochargers out into the world. But times have changed, and anyone who has anything to do with combustion engines is affected.”

So are all the local companies that supply BorgWarner. Our “historical fixation on turbochargers” is a “major challenge,” says Rainer Guth, head of the Donnersbergkreis district council. Take Femeg: providing parts for the devices made up 80 per cent of its automotive business.

Other nearby companies, too, are oriented to the auto industry. One is Gienanth, a big iron producer established in 1735 in Eisenberg, the biggest town in Donnersbergkreis, which found early fame a century ago by making parts for Bugatti racing cars.

It now produces components for locomotive and ship engines, and for the emergency generators used in hospitals or data centres. It also makes brake callipers for commercial vehicles and crankshaft bearing caps for BMW engines — a side of the business that will inevitably be affected by the phaseout of combustion engines.

Gienanth says it has spent the past few years “collaborating with customers on product solutions for EVs”. It is also “expanding and diversifying its product portfolio”, for example by working with the Berlin start-up STUR on making cast iron saucepans.

Donnersbergkreis is not a grimy relic of Germany’s fossil-fuel past. The region is plastered with wind turbines and solar panels. It boasts a Japanese-owned factory that makes surveillance cameras. Just beyond its borders lies the city of Kaiserslautern, where Automotive Cells Co, a joint venture between Mercedes-Benz, Stellantis and TotalEnergies, is building a gigafactory to produce lithium-ion battery cells for EVs.

But while some parts of the region are reviving, others are in decline. An hour’s drive away from Donnersbergkreis lies Saarlouis, home to a big Ford factory with a near-60 year history — and a bleak future.

Ford said last year it would stop building cars at the plant and construct its next generation EVs in the Spanish city of Valencia instead. This month it announced that talks to sell the factory to a big unnamed investor had failed. More than 3,000 jobs are at risk.

The slow demise of petrol-powered cars is one issue facing Donnersbergkreis; the huge surge in energy costs another. Reiner Bauer, the district’s head of business development, says many of the region’s energy-intensive companies were long seen as “innovative, profitable, with model training programmes and excellent management”. But the energy crisis changed all that.

“When you’re facing spiralling energy costs, you’re just no longer competitive internationally,” he says.

He cites the example of Heger, an iron foundry near Kaiserslautern making parts for wind turbines. The company declared insolvency in September last year: it said it was paying €700,000 a month for electricity, up from €100,000 before the price surge, and could no longer pass that increase on to customers. “The energy prices are killing us,” Johannes Heger, managing director, told local media at the time.


Another company paying a lot more for energy these days is BASF, the world’s biggest chemicals group, which is a 40-minute drive away from Donnersbergkreis in Ludwigshafen, on the Rhine. It has been forced to shut down several of its most energy-intensive production lines, including for ammonia, cyclohexanol, which is an ingredient of soaps and plastics, and TDI, used to make foam mattresses. Some 700 jobs will be affected.

The government is fatalistic about such developments. “We only produced ammonia here because we had access to cheap Russian gas — and now that’s gone,” says one senior official. “I don’t think Germany will be manufacturing basic chemicals, plastics and ammonia in 2035. Maybe it just makes more sense to produce them in Saudi Arabia, where energy is cheaper.”

But that’s not how it is seen in Donnersbergkreis. The district is home to hundreds of commuting BASF workers, who have watched in alarm as the company builds a new €10bn petrochemicals plant in China and downsizes in Europe.

“If such a company were to shift operations abroad because of high energy costs or a shortage of skilled workers in Germany, all the lights will go out here,” says Guth.

Building problems
It’s not just energy-intensive industries that are suffering: the slump in Germany’s construction sector is also being felt in Donnersbergkreis. “The situation is dramatic,” says Frank Dexheimer, head of Frambach, a building company in Kirchheimbolanden.

Construction firms across Germany have been hammered by high interest rates and a big increase in the cost of building materials. A survey by the Ifo Institute, a think-tank, found 21.4 per cent of residential builders were affected by project cancellations in September, the highest level since records began in 1991.

Dexheimer’s firm has been cushioned by the diversity of its services. It is involved in civil engineering projects and residential building renovations, where contracts are still to be had. But all companies focused solely on new construction are suffering, he says.


“Next year is going to be cruel for those guys,” he adds. “We’ll see lots of insolvencies.”

The real victims of the crisis are young families, Dexheimer says. The pricetag for a one-family house with a plot of land in Donnersbergkreis was €500,000 a couple of years ago, he says; now it is €750,000, the result of higher building costs. Meanwhile, mortgage rates have risen from about 1 to 4–5 per cent.

“Young families can’t get a home loan any more — they’re just too expensive,” he says.

Evidence of the slump is easy to find in Kirchheimbolanden. The town recently tried to market about 40 building plots for new houses, but only managed to sell three of them. “The site is lying idle,” says Dexheimer. “Demand has collapsed.”

Donnersbergkreis is also prey to one of Germany’s most abiding problems: a chronic shortage of skilled labour. The government has said that an ageing population means Germany could lack 7mn workers by 2035. It has passed laws to make it easier for foreigners to take up a job in the country. But business groups say much more needs to be done.

Hubert Hack, owner of a small iron foundry in Eisenberg that makes parts for the auto and mechanical engineering industries, says that finding workers has become his “biggest challenge” — even larger than high energy bills. He has been trying to fill three vacancies at his company for months.

“Young people seem more concerned about their work-life balance than with working hard,” he says.

Hack says he has resorted to hiring pensioners. “I have five of them that work here part-time, as needed,” the 64-year-old says. “They’re more reliable than the young.”

His story is typical. An Ifo survey in August found 43.1 per cent of German companies lack skilled workers. Habeck admitted earlier this month that the issue was one of the “biggest structural challenges we have to overcome.”

‘We need to get our mojo back’
But Habeck also sees reasons to be hopeful. Speaking to reporters earlier this month, he said the German economy should return to growth next year. Inflation is declining, the labour market is robust and real incomes are rising, he said, which could help to drag domestic demand out of its slump.

That optimism is shared by Joachim Nagel, head of Germany’s central bank. Speaking to business and political leaders in Berlin last week he dismissed claims Germany was the “sick man of Europe” or a country in the grip of “deindustrialisation.”

German companies had weathered the gas crisis well, he said, investing heavily in efficiency measures to cut their energy use. They had shown themselves to be “highly adaptable”, he said, praising the ingenuity of the country’s “hidden champions” and the strength of the Mittelstand, the small and medium-sized companies that form the backbone of the German economy.


Their resilience had left him “generally optimistic,” he said. “‘Made in Germany’ will, in my view, continue to be a coveted and successful trademark.”

Longer-term, Germany is also making great strides in building up new industries. Lured by massive subsidies, Intel and TSMC are constructing semiconductor plants in Magdeburg and Dresden, representing a shift in Germany’s industrial geography from the south to the east. Battery factories for electric vehicles are springing up everywhere and old-established companies such as Thyssenkrupp are investing billions to decarbonise their production.

Habeck says his ministry is overseeing an €80bn pipeline of planned investments by foreign firms. “Germany as a location for business is strong if it wants to be,” he said last month.

BorgWarner, the automotive turbine maker, is trying hard to reinvent itself. It has developed an “eBooster”, an electrically driven compressor that can be used in hybrids. Denne describes it as a “bridge to the future” for the Kirchheimbolanden site.

The company is also looking to use its turbocharger technology for decentralised power generation. Its Kirchheimbolanden tech centre has developed an “e-fan” — an electrically-driven fan for cooling the components of battery-driven cars. But that will be manufactured at BorgWarner’s factories in Portugal and the US, not in Donnersbergkreis.

Hans-Joachim Retzlaff, head of human resources at the tech centre, says business opportunities for the German auto industry are set to shrink.

“If you look at how Germany is turning into an importer of electric cars, and that we should reckon with lots of cheap Chinese EVs, it’s clear our share of the global market will dwindle,” he says. “And our business will become correspondingly smaller.”

Femeg is also trying to move with the times, away from the automotive sector and into arms manufacturing, an area that has boomed in Germany since the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

It owns a foundry in south-western Germany that makes components for Leopold tank engines and is also shifting to producing munition and parts for heavy military equipment.

“We’re not just sitting here moaning, you have to keep moving,” says Bernd Hofmann. But he thinks the downturn will deepen unless the government takes more decisive action, in particular on the question of energy costs.

“We have to make this country a more attractive place to invest in again,” he says. “We need a new spirit of optimism. We need to get our mojo back.”

WSJ : Sam Altman on the Future of AI—and How to Navigate the Tricky Path Forward

Sam Altman on the Future of AI—and How to Navigate the Tricky Path Forward
Open AI’s Altman and Mira Murati say artificial intelligence will be ‘the best tool humanity has yet created,’ but the key will be to manage the transition

In the fast-moving world of artificial intelligence, talk about the future tends to focus on something referred to as “artificial general intelligence”—the stage at which AI will be capable of doing any job a human can do, only better.

Perhaps no company is in a better position to talk about the potential benefits and risks of this so-called AGI than OpenAI (49%-owned by Microsoft MSFT 0.81%increase; green up pointing triangle), the creators of the popular chatbot ChatGPT. At The Wall Street Journal’s annual Tech Live conference last week, the Journal’s senior personal-technology columnist Joanna Stern spoke with OpenAI’s Chief Executive Sam Altman and Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati. Edited excerpts of their conversation follow.

SAM ALTMAN: The two things that will matter most over the next decade or few decades to improving the human condition are abundant and inexpensive intelligence: the more powerful, the more general, the smarter the better. I think that is AGI. And then, abundant and cheap energy. If we can get these two things done in the world, then it’s almost difficult to imagine how much else we could do. We’re big believers that you give people better tools, and they do things that astonish you. And I think AGI will be the best tool humanity has yet created.

With it, we will be able to solve all sorts of problems. We’ll be able to express ourselves in new, creative ways. We’ll make just incredible things for each other, for ourselves, for the world, for this unfolding human story. And it’s new, and anything new comes with change, and change is not always all easy.

WSJ: When will it be here, and how will we know it’s here?

MIRA MURATI: Probably in the next decade, but it’s a bit tricky. Often we talk about intelligence, and how intelligent this is, or whether it’s conscious, and sentient, and all of these terms—and they’re not quite right. Because they sort of define our own intelligence, and we’re building something slightly different.

WSJ: Some people have not been thrilled about some of the data you guys have used to train some of your models. Hollywood, publishers. As you work toward these next models, what are the conversations you’re having around the data?

ALTMAN: One, we obviously only want to use data that people are excited about us using.

But one of the challenges has been different kinds of data-owners have very different pictures. So we’re just experimenting with a lot of things. We’re doing partnerships of different shapes, and we think like with any new field, we’ll find something that sort of just becomes a new standard.

Also, as these models get smarter and more capable, we will need less training data. I think the conversation about data, and the shape of all of this, because of the technological progress we’re making, is about to shift.

WSJ: Well, publishers, like mine, they want money for that data. Is the future of this entire race about who can pay the most for the best data?

ALTMAN: No. That was sort of the point I was trying to make. The thing that people really like about a GPT model is not fundamentally that it knows particular knowledge. There are better ways to find that. It’s that it has this larval reasoning capacity, and that’s going to get better and better. That’s really what this is going to be about.

AI relations
WSJ: Is there a future where we have deep relationships with this type of bot?

MURATI: It’s going to be a significant relationship. Because we’re building the systems that are going to be everywhere: in your home, in your educational environment, in your work environment, and maybe when you’re having fun.

That’s why it’s actually so important to get it right. And we have to be so careful about how we design this interaction so that ultimately it’s elevating, fun, makes productivity better, and it enhances creativity.

We also want to make sure that, on the product side, we feel in control of these systems, in the sense that we can steer them to do the things that we want them to do and the output is reliable. As it has more information about your preferences, the things you like, the things you do, and as the capabilities of the models increase, it will become more personalized.

And it’s not just one system. You can have many such systems personalized for specific domains and tasks.

WSJ: That’s a big responsibility, though. And you will be sort of in control of people’s friends, maybe it gets to being people’s lovers. How do you think about that control?

ALTMAN: We’re not going to be the only player here. There’s going to be many people. So we get to put our “nudge” on the trajectory of this technological development. But: a) We really think that the decisions belong to humanity, society as a whole. And: b) We’ll be one of many actors building sophisticated systems here. There will be competing products that offer different things, there will be different kind of societal embraces and pushbacks, there will be regulatory stuff.

I personally have deep misgivings about this vision of the future where everyone is super close to AI friends, more so than human friends. I personally don’t want that. I accept that other people are going to want that, and some people are going to build that, and if that’s what the world wants, and what we decide makes sense, we’re going to get that.

The ‘fear’ issue
WSJ: We’ve got simple chatbots now. How do we go from that to this fear that is now pervading everywhere about AI?

ALTMAN: It doesn’t take much imagination to think about scenarios that deserve great caution. And, again, we all do this because we’re so excited about the tremendous upside and the incredibly positive impact. And it would be a moral failing not to pursue that for humanity. But we’ve got to address—and this happens with many other technologies—the downsides that come along with this.

It means that you are thoughtful about the risks. You try to measure what the capabilities are, and you try to build your own technology in a way that mitigates those risks. And then when you say like, “Hey, here’s a new safety technique,” you make that available to others.

WSJ: What are some of those?

MURATI: It’s not a single fix. You usually have to intervene everywhere, from the data to the model to the tools in the product, and, of course, policy. And then thinking about the entire regulatory and societal infrastructure that can keep up with these technologies that we’re building.

So, when you think about what are sort of the concrete safety measures along the way, No. 1 is actually rolling out the technology and slowly making contact with reality; understanding how it affects certain use-cases and industries; and actually dealing with the implications of that. Whether it’s regulatory, copyright, whatever the impact is, actually absorbing that, and dealing with that, and moving on to more and more capabilities. I don’t think that building the technology in a lab, in a vacuum—without contact with the real world and with the friction that you see with reality—is a good way to actually deploy it safely.

ALTMAN: The point Mira was making is really important. It’s very difficult to make a technology “safe” in the lab. Society uses things in different ways, and adapts in different ways. And I think the more we deploy AI, the more AI is used in the world, the safer AI gets, and the more we kind of collectively decide, “Hey, here’s a thing that is not an acceptable risk tolerance, and this other thing that people were worried about, that’s totally OK.”

Detection tools
WSJ: Right now there’s no tool, from OpenAI at least, that I can put in an image or some of the text, and ask, “Is this AI-generated?”, correct?

MURATI: For image, we have technology that’s almost 99% reliable. But we’re still testing it, it’s early.

WSJ: Is this something you plan to release?

MURATI: Yes.

WSJ: For both images and text?

MURATI: For text, we’re trying to figure out what makes sense. For images, it’s a bit more straightforward problem. Often we will experiment, we will put out something, we will get feedback. And sometimes we’ll take it back, make it better and roll it out again.

ALTMAN: This idea of “watermarking” content is not something everybody has the same opinion about what is good and what is bad. There are a lot of people who really don’t want their generated content watermarked. Also, it’s not going to be super-robust to everything. Like, maybe you could do it for images, and maybe for longer text, maybe not for short text.

This is why we want to engage in the conversation. We are willing to follow the collective wishes of society on this point. I don’t think it’s a black-and-white issue.

Work will change
AUDIENCE QUESTION: We’re about to change the nature of work. There’s a large portion of society that’s not even in this discussion. How do we come up with some of those frameworks and voluntarily bring things about that will actually result in a better world that doesn’t leave everybody else behind?

MURATI: I completely agree with you, that it’s the ultimate technology that could really increase inequality and make things so much worse for us as human beings and civilization. Or it could be amazing, and it could bring along a lot of creativity and productivity and enhance us. Maybe a lot of people don’t want to work eight hours, or 100 hours a week. Maybe they want to work four hours a day and do a bunch of other things.

It’s certainly going to lead to a lot of disruption in the workforce.

ALTMAN: It’s a super-important question. Every technological revolution affects the job market. I’m not afraid of that at all. In fact, I think that’s good, I think that’s the way of progress. And we’ll find new and better jobs.

The things that I think we do need to confront as a society is the speed at which this is going to happen. We are going to really have to do something about this transition. It is not enough to just give people a universal basic income. People need to have agency, the ability to influence this, we need to jointly be architects of the future.

As you said, not everybody’s in these discussions, but more are every year. And by putting this out in people’s hands, getting billions of people to use ChatGPT, not only do people have the opportunity to think about what’s coming and participate in that conversation, but people use the tool to push the future forward. And that’s really important to us.

>>> US After Hours Summary: AGYS +10.2%, CR +5.6%, MEDP +5% on earnings; TBI -12

After Hours Summary: AGYS +10.2%, CR +5.6%, MEDP +5% on earnings; TBI -12.3%, HXL -7.7%, AAN -6.9% down on earnings
After Hours Gainers:
Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: AGYS +10.2%, ASPN +9.4% (guidance), AMRX +7.4% (guidance), CR +5.6%, MATX +5.5% (guidance), HRI +5.2%, MEDP +5%, IPAR +4% (guidance), CLF +2.9%, IBTX +2%, NUE +1.4%, ARE +1.3%, BRO +1%, HSTM +0.5%, RLI +0.2%,
Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: ASTI +36.4% (U.S. Dept of Energy encourages Ascent to submit full application), RDFN +14.1% (APO agree to commit up to $250 mln of financing), IFF +1.9% (mulling $3.5 bln sale of Pharma Solutions business, according to Bloomberg), MREO +1.7% (reports on recent program developments), SEE +1.1% (CEO stepping down; reiterates guidance), MSFT +0.3% (AUD$5 bln investment expanding AI in Australia)
After Hours Losers:
Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: TBI -12.3%, HXL -7.7%, AGNC -7.6% (prelim Q3 estimates), AAN -6.9%, CDNS -3.5%, CALX -2.8%, CCK -2.6%, PKG -1.1%, ASR -0.3%
Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: REXR -1.4% (files mixed shelf), IONQ -1% (Co-Founder stepping down)