>>> US After Hours Summary: HNST +32.1%, OSPN +27.9%, RSI +21.7%, YEXT +19% high

After Hours Summary: HNST +32.1%, OSPN +27.9%, RSI +21.7%, YEXT +19% higher on earnings; VSCO -25.4%, KGS -12.8%, SLNO -7.7%, DSGX -3.7% lower on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: HNST +32.1%, OSPN +27.9%, RSI +21.7%, YEXT +19%, HG +10.7%, KRO +3%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: MLR +3.1% (increases dividend), NYAX +2.9% (to acquire Vmtecnologia), CORZ +2.8% (contract to supply up to 16 MW of data center infrastructure to CoreWeave), CRGY +1% (files mixed shelf securities offering), AXP +0.4% (increases dividend), QDEL +0.3% (receives approval from Health Canada for its Triage PLGF test for laboratory use in Canada), ALG +0.1% (CFO to retire, names new CFO), GILD +0.1% (provides new data on Biktarvy in people with HIV and comorbidities)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: CDMO -31.9% (issues guidance; also proposed private placement of $160 mln of convertible notes), VSCO -25.4% (also authorizes new $250 mln share repurchase program), KGS -12.8%, INFN -8.7%, SLNO -7.7%, DSGX -3.7%, HPK -3.3%, HDSN -3.3%, ZYME -2.7% (also stock offering by selling shareholders)

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: ADT -9.7% (55 mln share offering by selling shareholders), RGNX -3.1% ($125 mln stock offering), TCRX -2% (files $300 mln mixed shelf securities offering), PHVS -2% (files for 5,545,155 ordinary shares by selling shareholder), CWAN -1.2% (launches 16.25 mln share offering), LIND -0.8% (files $300 mln mixed shelf securities offering), KAI -0.2% (increases dividend), ASR -0.1% (reports Feb traffic)

TechCrunch : As mega-rounds become rarer, energy startups are powering up

As mega-rounds become rarer, energy startups are powering up

The largest funding rounds raised by startups are becoming rarer and rarer. For upstart companies working on the future of energy, however, the market is surprisingly strong.

The venture deceleration, and its late-stage glaciation, are not stopping the companies that want to reinvent energy from raising huge rounds. Given what we’re seeing around the world, it’s a welcome fact, even if it does feel a decade or more too late.

Powering up
Nine-figure rounds are often called “mega-rounds” due to their massive heft. During the first two months and first days of March last year, some 12 deals met our “energy” criteria, tracking companies that are working in power generation and distribution using Crunchbase data. This includes projects like solar power generation, batteries and EV charging. We did not include OEMs that build electric vehicles like Lucid or Fisker in our analysis, however.

From the start of 2023 through March 4 of the same year, 11 deals met our criteria. Of that group, seven were based in China. During the same portion of Q1 2024, we saw 12 deals that met our standards. However, this time around only one was a Chinese company.

A reformed global venture capital market
As the global venture capital market adjusts to persistently higher interest rates, capital flowing into technology startups has slowed. The deceleration of private-market investing into private tech companies has been especially sharp in the later-stages of startup formation, thanks to a limited exit environment and less ebullient public-market valuations for many software companies.

Later-stage startup dealmaking has changed so much in the last several quarters that it’s easy to forget how bullish private-market investors were in recent years. CB Insights reported that from Q1 2019 through Q4 2022, every quarter saw more than 100 nine-figure deals, or startup rounds worth $100 million or more. In contrast, Q4 2023 saw just 78, the worst result since at least the end of 2018.

More recent data underscores a continuing trend. A TechCrunch analysis of Crunchbase data found that from January 1 through March 4 2023, around 115 rounds met our criteria for nine-figure private-market deals (excluding private equity, all post-IPO transactions, certain debt rounds, etc.). During the same portion of this year, the number fell to 75.

If the number of energy-focused mega-rounds was all but flat year-over-year, why highlight the metric? Because energy-focused mega-rounds made up a larger portion of the nine-figure deals that TechCrunch analyzed, from just under 10% in the 2023 period we are examining to 16% in the same portion of 2024. That’s a more than 60% gain in relative share, a massive shift for any single sector in just one year.

That’s why the 12 venture capital rounds that we saw in the energy sector stood out to us like a beacon; there aren’t that many to see, period, making the density in one sector that is not as known to be in favor (as with AI) all the more remarkable. And with a massive geographic shift underway at the same time, something is clearly heating up in energy-land.

Inside energy’s power surge
In 2023, China dominated energy mega-rounds, with most of the money going to makers of solar panels and battery materials. Both are sectors that China has lavished with incentives and state funding, and as a result, the country has dominated the market for both. In 2021, 75% of the world’s solar modules and a whopping 85% of all cells were made in China, according to the International Energy Agency. The new funding, therefore, was less about investing in a promising market than lapping the competition.

The same could be said for battery materials. Chinese companies own 75% of the graphite supply chain, which encompasses everything from mining to finished anodes, according to Benchmark Minerals Intelligence. And yet two Chinese companies attracted a combined $380 million of investment in the first quarter of 2023.

Fast-forward to this year and the picture in energy mega-rounds looks dramatically different. Diversity is the name of the game. Only one Chinese firm cracked the top ranks, with the remainder almost equally balanced between the U.S. and EU. That’s because of industrial policy: The Inflation Reduction Act in the U.S. and the Green Deal in the EU offered hundreds of billions in incentives for manufacturers and suppliers to set up operations onshore. In return, companies have invested hundreds of billions more. These mega-rounds are a reaction to market trends, suggesting that the reshoring of key parts of the climate tech economy will persist for years to come.

Geographic diversity is only part of the picture. Where solar and battery materials captured the lion’s share of megadeals in 2023, the same round sizes this year have been spread across a range of technologies. Geothermal energy, industrial heat, e-fuels, battery recycling, EV charging, lithium mining and geologic hydrogen are all accounted for. Even heat pumps, a decades-old technology, received a €145 million infusion — that’s how promising that market has become.

The wide range of industries represented this year suggests that many formerly early-stage companies have mastered their science or technical risks and have started their journey toward commercialization. Investors appear confident they’ll make it, too, happy to underwrite a part of the startup journey that delivers smaller though more likely returns. The IPO window is still probably a few more years away for these companies, but the check sizes suggest that investors can see it on the horizon.

With the ocean at record temps, news about sea ice looking grim and droughts hitting hard around the world, it’s a good moment to sit back and consider what we are doing to our small planet. The above investing trends are welcome, but with carbon emissions still setting records, we’re still throwing cups of water at a house fire. More, and faster, please

TechCrunch : OpenAI says Musk only ever contributed $45M, wanted to merge with T

OpenAI says Musk only ever contributed $45M, wanted to merge with Tesla or take control

OpenAI, the most valuable AI startup, said Wednesday it intends to dismiss all claims made by Elon Musk in a recent lawsuit and suggested that the billionaire entrepreneur, who was involved in the company’s co-founding, didn’t really have that much impact on its development and success.

In a blog post authored by the entire OpenAI band — Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, John Schulman, Sam Altman, Wojciech Zaremba and OpenAI — the Microsoft-backed startup revealed that since its inception in 2015, it had raised less than $45 million from Musk, despite his initial commitment to provide as much as $1 billion in funding. The startup also secured more than $90 million from other donors to support its research efforts, it said.

OpenAI’s response follows Musk suing Altman, Brockman, OpenAI and other affiliates of the firm last week, alleging the ChatGPT-maker had breached its original contractual agreements by pursuing profits instead of the nonprofit’s founding mission to develop AI that benefits humanity. OpenAI was founded to build a counterweight to Google, he said.

OpenAI’s founding agreement required the startup to make its technology “freely available” to the public but the firm had over time changed its priorities to maximizing profits for Microsoft, Musk said in the lawsuit.

The high-stakes legal battle between Musk and OpenAI could have far-reaching implications for the future of AI. As the most valuable AI startup, with a valuation of over $80 billion, OpenAI’s success with ChatGPT has ignited an unprecedented AI race since its public release in late 2022. The outcome of this lawsuit could significantly impact the direction and pace of AI development, as well as the balance of power among key players in the industry.

In its blog post today, OpenAI asserted that as it recognized the vast computational resources necessary to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI) — an AI system with human-level or superior intelligence — it became clear that the annual costs would amount to billions of dollars. This realization led to the understanding that transitioning to a for-profit structure was essential to secure the required funding and resources.

This is when disagreements started between Musk and other co-founders of OpenAI, OpenAI wrote in the blog post, which includes five email exchanges between Musk and OpenAI executives.

“As we discussed a for-profit structure in order to further the mission, Elon wanted us to merge with Tesla or he wanted full control. Elon left OpenAI, saying there needed to be a relevant competitor to Google/DeepMind and that he was going to do it himself. He said he’d be supportive of us finding our own path,” OpenAI wrote.

“In early February 2018, Elon forwarded us an email suggesting that OpenAI should ‘attach to Tesla as its cash cow,’ commenting that it was ‘exactly right . . . Tesla is the only path that could even hope to hold a candle to Google,'” OpenAI wrote.

OpenAI said Wednesday it maintains that its mission is to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity, which includes developing safe and beneficial AGI while promoting widespread access to its tools. OpenAI’s technology is being used in places, including Kenya and India, to empower people and improve their daily lives, the startup wrote.

“We’re sad that it’s come to this with someone whom we’ve deeply admired — someone who inspired us to aim higher, then told us we would fail, started a competitor, and then sued us when we started making meaningful progress towards OpenAI’s mission without him,” OpenAI wrote in the blog post.

In response to Musk’s accusation of OpenAI abandoning its open source principles, the Microsoft-backed startup countered by emphasizing that Musk had been aware of and agreed to the eventual shift away from complete transparency as the organization made significant progress in its AGI development.

“Elon understood the mission did not imply open-sourcing AGI. As Ilya told Elon: ‘As we get closer to building AI, it will make sense to start being less open. The Open in openAI means that everyone should benefit from the fruits of AI after its built, but it’s totally OK to not share the science . . . ,’ to which Elon replied: ‘Yup.'”

>>> US Close Dow +0,20% S&P +0,51% Nasdaq +0,58% Russell +0,70%

Closing Stock Market Summary
Stocks bounced back today after yesterday's retreat. The major indices faded from their highs in the afternoon trade, but still closed with gains ranging from 0.2% to 0.7%. A buy-the-dip mentality, which as worked well for participants since the start of the year, contributed to the positive bias.

Renewing buying activity in growth stocks and the tech space following impressive earnings and outlook from cybersecurity software provider CrowdStrike (CRWD 329.57, +32.01, +10.8%) also contributed to the upside moves.

Many stocks participated in today's broad rally. The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) gained 0.6% and nine of the 11 S&P 500 sectors finished higher. The utilities sector (+1.0%) saw the largest gain, followed by the heavily-weighted information technology sector (+0.9%).
Meanwhile, losses in some mega cap constituents led the communication services (-0.2%) and consumer discretionary (-0.4%) sectors to underperform the broader market.

Market participants were also digesting the first day of Fed Chair Powell's semiannual monetary policy testimony before the House Financial Services Committee, which failed to produce any surprising headlines. Mr. Powell acknowledged that it will likely be appropriate to lower the fed funds rate range later this year.

Rate cut expectations were little changed by the remarks. The probability of a 25 basis points rate cut to 5.00-5.25% at June FOMC meeting is 71.4% now versus 72.4% yesterday, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.

In other news, New York Community Bancorp (NYCB 3.46, +0.24, +7.5%) rallied after announcing an over $1 billion equity investment anchored by former U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin's Liberty Strategic Capital, Hudson Bay and Reverence Capital. Shares initially plunged more than 40.0% today on a Wall Street Journal report that the company was seeking to raise capital.

The 10-yr note yield slid three basis points to 4.10% and the 2-yr note yield settled one basis point higher.
  • S&P 500: +7.0% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite: +6.8% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: +5.7% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +2.6% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +2.0% YTD

Reviewing today's economic data:
  • Weekly MBA Mortgage Applications 9.7%; Prior -5.6%
  • February ADP Employment Change 140K (consensus 150K); Prior was revised to 111K from 107K
  • January JOLTS - Job Openings 8.863 mln; Prior was revised to 8.889 mln from 9.026 mln
  • January Wholesale Inventories -0.3% (consensus -0.1%); Prior 0.4%

Thursday's economic calendar features:
  • 8:30 ET: Weekly Initial Claims (consensus 217,000; prior 215,000), Continuing Claims (prior 1.905 mln), January Trade Balance (consensus -$63.3 bln; prior -$62.2 bln), revised Q4 Productivity (consensus 3.1%; prior 3.2%) and Unit Labor Costs (consensus 0.6%; prior 0.5%)
  • 10:30 ET: Weekly natural gas inventories (prior -96 bcf)
  • 15:00 ET: January Consumer Credit (consensus $10.0 bln; prior $1.6 bln)