>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 17th of November 2023

>>> Up
* Babcock Raised to Overweight at Barclays; PT 529 pence
* Enel Raised to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 7 euros
* Evonik Raised to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 17.50 euros
* Fielmann Raised to Buy at DZ Bank; PT 52 euros
* Fresenius Medical Raised to Buy at SocGen; PT 71 euros
* NatWest Raised to Overweight at Barclays; PT 330 pence
* Restore Raised to Buy at Panmure Gordon; PT 250 pence
* Vanquis Raised to Hold at Canaccord; PT 123 pence
* Vestas Raised to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 161 kroner

>>> Down
* Air Products Cut to Sell at Redburn; PT $240
* Altice USA Cut to Reduce at HSBC; PT $1.20
* Airbnb Cut to Inline at Evercore ISI; PT $136
* Burberry Cut to Neutral at Mediobanca SpA; PT 2,100 pence
* Clariane SE Cut to Neutral at BNPP Exane; PT 2.80 euros
* EQS Group Cut to Reduce at Baader Helvea; PT 40 euros
* Great Portland Cut to Underperform at Jefferies; PT 352 pence

>>> Initiation
* Deckers Outdoor Rated New Buy at Truist Secs; PT $735
* Eco Animal Health Rated New Buy at Shore Capital; PT 175 pence
* Nike Rated New Hold at Truist Secs; PT $108
* On Holding Rated New Hold at Truist Secs; PT $29
* Trifork Holding Rated New Buy at ABG; PT 140 kroner
* Under Armour Rated New Hold at Truist Secs; PT $8

>>> Call

>>> What to look at today - 17th of November 2023

Asian stocks fell Friday as the escalating fight between the US and China for technological dominance triggered Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. to scrap the listing of its $11 billion cloud unit. Alibaba’s 10% slump, the biggest in a year, weighed on benchmarks of Hong Kong and the mainland as the company scuttled its planned cloud spinoff due to US restrictions on the export of chips. The broader MSCI Asia Pacific Index was down, but still on pace for a weekly gain of about 3%. Bonds climbed after data underscored a gradual deceleration in the US economy.  The e-commerce giant’s surprise decision undercuts the bull cases for the stock and lays bare the struggles the company faces in convincing investors of its $200 billion valuation. That’s because the cloud spinoff had been a key investment thesis since the firm unveiled a radical corporate overhaul earlier this year.  Meanwhile, oil headed for a fourth weekly loss after sinking into a bear market as signs of healthy supplies and rising stockpiles offset attempts by OPEC+ leaders Saudi Arabia and Russia to keep declines in check. Crude steadied around $73 a barrel in Asia after dropping more than 20% from a high in September. Treasury yields were steady after declining Thursday, as soft US economic data fueled optimism the Federal Reserve’s most-aggressive hiking campaign in decades is at an end. Continuing applications for US unemployment benefits rose to the highest in almost two years.  US shares wavered on Thursday after a rally from “oversold” levels that was driven by bets the central bank is done with rate hikes — and turbocharged by short covering. The S&P 500 is still on pace for its best month in over a year. China told a handful of nationwide lenders to cap interest rates on interbank funding, people familiar with the directive said, a move that dovetailed with a sizable cash injection intended to calm the market after last month’s unexpected liquidity crunch. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. sold yen bonds at lower costs in its second Japan deal of the year as speculation mounts that the billionaire investor may put more money into the nation’s share market. In India, the regulator asked banks to increase buffers for some consumer loans as it seeks to check a runaway rise in risky debt in Asia’s third-largest economy.
Meantime, money-market fund assets rose to an all-time high for the second straight week as interest rates north of 5% and volatility in fixed-income markets drove investors to havens. Gold edged higher after climbing the most in a month in the previous session. US After Hours GPS +15.3%, ROST +5.7%, BZH +3.5% higher on earnings; AMAT -7.3%, DLB -4.4% lower on earnings; CHPT -27.4% down sharply on revenue cut.

Nikkei +0.48% Hang Seng -2.09% CSI -0.22% Shanghai +0.03% Shenzen +0.37%

Eur$ 1.0854 CNH 7.2481 CNY 7.2433 JPY 150.59 GBP 1.2416 CHF 0.8888 RUB 89.2713 TRY 28.7234 WTI$ 73.04 +0.20% Gold 1,985 +0.17% BTC 36,310 +0.95% ETH 1,976 +1%

S&P +0.08% Nasdaq -0.06% EuroStoxx +0.32% FTSE +0.23% Dax +0.23% SMI +0.22%

Macro :
- European Commission Tells Staff to Suspend Ads on X: Politico

Keep an eye on :
- ALTR PL : Altri 9M Net Income EU28.2M Vs. EU117.4M Y/y
- ANA SM : Acciona Energia Maintains FY23 Ebitda Outlook EU1.2B-EU1.3B
- ANIM IM : Anima Holding Agrees to Buy Julius Baer’s Kairos Partners
- AML LN : Aston Martin F1 Owner Sells Stake at £1 Billion Valuation
- AUTO IM : Italy’s ASTM Weighs Plan to Merge Assets With Autostrade: Stampa
- AZN LN : FDA Approves AstraZeneca’s Truqap Combo For Breast Cancer
- BRNK GY : Branicks Group Sells Logistics Properties in Neufahrn for ~€80M
- DHER GY : Meituan Mulls Deal for Delivery Hero’s Southeast Asia Arm (2)
- FGR FP : Eiffage Gets EDF Nuclear Contract Valued at More Than EU4b
- ENEL IM : Mayor of SP says he requested cancellation of contract with Enel
- FL US : Foot Locker to be an official U.S. marketing partner of the NBA
- G IM : Generali 3Q Operating Profit Beats Estimates, Generali Profit Beats Estimates Despite Natural-Disasters Hit
- GET FP : Getlink Shares Jump After Betaville ‘Uncooked Alert’
- GLEN LN : Gas-Supply Cliff Is South Africa’s Next Crisis, Energy Body Says
- IBM US : IBM Suspends X Ads After Report of Placement Near Nazi Content
- IP IM : Interpump Offering by Gruppo IPG Prices at EU42.10/Shr (Nov. 16)
- BAER SW : Anima Holding Agrees to Buy Julius Baer’s Kairos Partners
- LDO IM : Leonardo DRS Offering by Holder Prices at $17.75/Share
- LSEG LN : LSE Group Plans to Execute £1 Billion of Buybacks During 2024
- MRL SM : Merlin Properties Sees FY FFO per Share Above EU0.60, Saw EU0.60
- MSFT US : *OPENAI EXPLORES WAYS TO GET CHATGPT INTO CLASSROOMS: REUTERS
- ETE GA : Greece Sells 22% Stake in National Bank for €5.30 a Piece
- RNO FP : Renault’s Fresh Ampere IPO Pitch Gets Warm Reception: ECM Watch
- VOLCARB SS : *GEELY EXPLORES SALE OF ABOUT 100M VOLVO CARS SHARES
- ZURN SW : Zurich Insurance Names Bruno Scaroni CEO of Zurich Italia

TechCrunch : Apple to finally bring RCS to iPhones

Apple to finally bring RCS to iPhones

Apple plans to add support for the RCS standard on iOS next year, the iPhone-maker said Thursday in a major reversal that would resolve the widespread issue of compatibility in text messaging between iPhones and Android smartphones, but stopped short of eliminating what is known colloquially as the “green bubble” dread.

Apple’s longstanding unwillingness to support RCS has perpetuated fragmentation in messaging ecosystems, particularly affecting Android users, critics have argued over the years. Apple’s stance, often seen as maintaining ecosystem exclusivity, stirred debate in the tech community over interoperability and user convenience.

Well, no more. In an abrupt announcement today, Apple said it, too, believes that “RCS Universal Profile will offer a better interoperability experience when compared to SMS or MMS.” The company, which plans to roll out the support next year, added: “This will work alongside iMessage, which will continue to be the best and most secure messaging experience for Apple users.”

The major reversal follows Google’s repeated request — and public pressure on — Apple to add support for RCS to iPhones. “People have talked about ‘green bubbles’ as an Android problem,” Hiroshi Lockheimer, SVP at Google, tweeted last year, referring to the visual distinction seen when a message is sent from an Android user to an iPhone, where it appears in a green bubble.

While Apple plans to adopt RCS, it has confirmed that those messages will still be displayed in green bubbles.

“We’re not asking Apple to make iMessage available on Android. We’re asking Apple to support the industry standard for modern messaging (RCS) in iMessage, just as they support the older SMS / MMS standards. By not incorporating RCS, Apple is holding back the industry and holding back the user experience for not only Android users but also their own customers,” he tweeted.

Apple, too, hasn’t been shy about its feeling on RCS. Apple chief Tim Cook dismissed the idea of his company adopting RCS in iMessage a year ago, and suggested the questioner at a conference to buy their mom an iPhone.

Rich Communication Services, or RCS, is the collective effort of a number of industry players to supercharge the traditional SMS with modern features such as richer texts and end-to-end encryption. Google, Samsung and a number of other firms, including telecom operators, have rolled out support for RCS to over 800 millions users worldwide in recent years.

Critics argue that the disruption in group chats and interactions between Android and iPhone users has historically deterred many from transitioning to Android smartphones — and it’s by design. This tactic came to light in Apple’s legal battle with Epic Games, where internal discussions revealed a conscious decision to keep iMessage within its ecosystem.

During the legal dispute, a wealth of internal Apple documents became accessible to the public. These documents exposed a prolonged internal debate about introducing iMessage to Android-operated devices. “In the absence of a strategy to become the primary messaging service for bulk of cell phone users, I am concerned the iMessage on Android would simply serve to remove obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones,” Craig Federighi, Apple’s chief software executive, said in a 2013 email.

Phil Schiller, the then marketing chief, echoed this sentiment in 2016, advising Cook in an email, “Moving iMessage to Android will hurt us more than help us.” That same year, an email from a former Apple executive cautioned that iMessage creates significant user retention, describing it as “serious lock-in.”

Apple’s Thursday decision, coincidentally, follows Google and many telecom operators recently urging EU regulators to make Apple designate iMessage as a “core” service under the new Digital Markets Act, forcing the iPhone-maker to make the chat app fully compatible with rivals. As TechCrunch first reported this month, Apple has disclosed in a filing that it “expects to make” several policy changes to comply with the new guidelines that go into effect next year.

WSJ : Avoiding China Has Been a Winning Investment Strategy. But It Isn’t Easy.

Avoiding China Has Been a Winning Investment Strategy. But It Isn’t Easy.
Chinese stocks have diverged from the rest of emerging markets, but the country still weighs heavily on other economies

Investors in emerging-market stocks have profited this year by staying away from China.

The MSCI China Index is down 8% this year through Nov. 15, while a broader emerging-markets benchmark that excludes China has risen 8% over the same period. Chinese stocks have been weighed down by the country’s shaky economic reopening, a pullback by foreign portfolio managers and an increasing reluctance among the country’s small investors to buy stocks.

The large divergence in performance, and geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China, have fueled a drive toward exchange-traded funds that exclude Chinese stocks. BlackRock’s iShares ETF that tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index has more than doubled in size this year to $7.6 billion as of this week. A few other ETFs that offer similar strategies also have doubled their assets under management.

The Thrift Savings Plan, which holds the retirement savings of U.S. federal employees and members of the uniformed services, has a large international stock fund that will shift to tracking a global MSCI benchmark that excludes China and Hong Kong. The international index fund has $68 billion from plan participants and will make the transition next year, the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board said this week.

But can investors really cut their China exposure completely?

Many analysts and portfolio managers are skeptical about the avoid-China strategy, in part because of the enormous gravity the world’s second-largest economy pulls in Asia and around the world.

China’s importance to other emerging markets also means a bounceback in its economy would be felt widely. But portfolio managers say those who take a dim view of the country’s prospects should consider how else they might hedge against China’s market malaise. Here are a few reasons why.

China’s problems are everyone’s problems
China makes up around 30% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, which has gained 2.8% this year through Nov. 15. But even when the country is removed from this and other global indexes, investors are still exposed to China’s economy—and its political currents.

“I don’t know if EM ex-China is something that really exists…It is still very, very exposed to China,” said Hicham Lahbabi, deputy head of Asia ex-Japan equity at Amundi, an asset-management company.

Taiwan is an extreme example. The self-governed island has a weight of more than 21% in the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index as of October and is highly exposed to mainland China. Taiwan is often talked about as a flashpoint of a possible military conflict involving China and the U.S., its giant chip manufacturers risk being caught up in tensions between the world’s two superpowers, and it relies on the mainland for about a fifth of its trade.

China’s economic clout means it is a crucial trade partner for countries across the world. This is particularly true of emerging economies, where Beijing has steadily built up economic and political ties. It is the largest source of demand for exports from Brazil, South Africa and South Korea, according to the World Bank’s latest available data. These countries are all a big part of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index.

It isn’t just emerging markets: China is also one of the biggest trading partners of the U.S., although the numbers are declining.

The professionals aren’t ready
There are also technical hurdles for investors who want to insulate themselves from Chinese market volatility. Unless individual investors are going to pick their own stocks, they need to trust others to look after their money—either active managers or passive funds, including ETFs. The vast majority of emerging-markets stock funds hold shares of Chinese companies.

Emerging-market investors who only want to put money into funds that exclude China have relatively few products to choose from at present. They would be cutting their options by more than 90%, said Michael Kelly, a portfolio manager at PineBridge Investments. He said asset-management companies would eventually fill the gap, but it will take time.

“We’re still at the early stages of eventually seeing an EM ex-China adoption because it sounds like clients have been interested, but the product offerings are not as diverse,” said Kelly.

Investing in emerging markets without Chinese stocks is a relatively new strategy. The MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index was launched in 2017, almost three decades after the broader benchmark was created.

Where else do you put your money?
Investors who want to buy Chinese shares can do so in the U.S., Hong Kong or mainland China itself, including through stock-trading links that make it relatively simple for international investors to bet on Chinese stocks. That gives investors a lot of choice.

The value of Chinese companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges was more than $11 trillion at the end of September, according to figures from the World Federation of Exchanges. There are several more trillions of dollars of mainland Chinese shares listed in Hong Kong and on U.S. stock exchanges.

No other emerging market offers this sort of scale. The total value of stocks listed on India’s National Stock Exchange was about $3.6 trillion in September. South Korea’s stock exchange had a total market capitalization of around $1.7 trillion. Brazil’s was worth $850 billion.

The fact that these markets are smaller than China’s means it is more likely that investors will end up concentrating on the same pool of stocks. That will make it harder for investors to beat the wider market, said fund managers.

It also means investors may find it hard to diversify away from certain big themes, even when they spread their money between different countries. For example, investors who choose to shift money from China and put it into Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and India—some of the biggest stock markets in Asia outside of mainland China and Hong Kong—would be taking a big bet on technology, said Kunjal Gala, head of global emerging markets at Federated Hermes.

“You will be hostage to the chip cycles and the handset-replacement cycles,” he said.

FT : ‘Big Short’ hedge fund pulls out of $1.6bn bets against US market

‘Big Short’ hedge fund pulls out of $1.6bn bets against US market
The wagers against SPY and QQQ ETFs were built up in the second quarter before the ETFs suffered losses of about 3%

Michael Burry, the hedge fund manager whose successful bets against the US housing market during the subprime crisis were immortalised in the 2015 movie The Big Short, has pulled out $1.6bn in wagers against two exchange traded funds tracking the US market.

Burry’s Scion Asset Management closed out two short positions against ETFs tracking the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices between June 30 and September 30 in the form of $887mn and $739mn bets against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) and the Invesco QQQ ETF, respectively, according to a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Strong starts to 2023 have allowed the $416bn SPY to climb 16.4 per cent and sent the $207bn QQQ up 42.3 per cent year-to-date, according to Morningstar. But over the third quarter of the year, the ETFs declined 3.2 per cent and 2.8 per cent, respectively. This indicates that Burry’s bets may well have paid off because second quarter 13F filings show the bets were in place at the end of that quarter.

Scion’s largest single position as of September 30 was a $47mn put option — offering the right but not the obligation to sell shares in the future — on the $9.2bn iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX), which has significant holdings in Advanced Micro Devices, Broadcom, Nvidia, Intel and Texas Instruments. SOXX is up about 42 per cent since January 1 and about 7 per cent since September 30, according to data from Morningstar.

Burry’s investment strategy is closely followed by investors due to the fame he continues to enjoy following the coverage of his success at the time of the subprime crisis and subsequent dramatisation of his role in The Big Short.

Burry’s portfolio has scaled down significantly with the retirement of the QQQ and SPY bets and now sits at about $99mn, near the $107mn of Scion reported holdings on March 30, according to the filings. The position against SOXX represents nearly half of Scion’s portfolio as of the most recent filing.

The changes to Scion’s portfolio were revealed in 13F filings, which are mandatory reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission by managers with assets of at least $100mn. They must be lodged with the regulator within 45 days of the close of the previous quarter, which was September 30.

The news that he had pulled out of broad market bets against US stocks came as 13F filings from Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway revealed it had slashed its positions in a number of blue-chip US companies in the third quarter.

An email to Scion was not returned. BlackRock, which owns the iShares suite of funds, declined to comment.

FT : Convicted mining tycoon Beny Steinmetz linked to Italy’s largest oil refine

Convicted mining tycoon Beny Steinmetz linked to Italy’s largest oil refinery
Rome blessed purchase of Sicily plant by a company connected to billionaire convicted of corruption in Switzerland

The company chosen by Italy’s government to take over the country’s largest oil refinery from its Russian owner has links to mining executive Beny Steinmetz, who was convicted of corruption.

The ties between the Franco-Israeli billionaire and GOI Energy, which bought the Sicilian refinery from Lukoil earlier this year, raise questions over the sale and ownership of an asset Rome deems strategic.

Steinmetz, who was convicted of corruption in Switzerland and Romania, travelled to Rome and Milan in November and December 2022 to discuss a €1.5bn bid for the refinery with lawyers and advisers, according to four people with knowledge of the meetings.

Steinmetz was accompanied by Alexia Bakoyannis on these trips, according to three of the people. She is the niece of Greek prime minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and owns shares in Cyprus-based GOI Energy, of which she was also briefly a board member, according to company records.

A Steinmetz family foundation is also an investor in Argus New Energy Fund, the largest shareholder in GOI Energy, according to classified documents used by the Italian government to approve the transaction.

Another link is the chief executive of GOI Energy, Michael Bobrov, who holds a stake in the Cyprus company and is also a shareholder in a refinery owned by sons-in-law of Steinmetz in Israel.

The forced sale of the Sicilian plant, which accounts for a fifth of Italy’s refining capacity, took place as the EU was preparing to ban imports of Russian seaborne and petroleum products in December last year. Rome exercised its golden powers, which give it the right to veto deals or impose requirements over the purchase of strategic assets.

Despite concerns raised by the US, the government run by Giorgia Meloni approved the sale to GOI Energy after the company outbid US private equity firm Crossbridge and Swiss commodity trader Vitol. It had also offered stronger reassurances over jobs and operations, the government said at the time.

“The ISAB refinery is a critical part of Italy’s refining system, accounting for 30 per cent of its diesel supply and 20 per cent of total capacity,” said Viktor Katona, analyst at data provider Kpler. “When Europe’s third-largest refinery ends up being sold to a mostly unknown company, that does definitely raise eyebrows.”

In September, Steinmetz was arrested in Cyprus on the basis of a European Arrest Warrant issued by Romania, where he was convicted in 2020 and sentenced to five years in jail for corruption in a real estate fraud case. The 67-year-old executive was released this month after the Cypriot supreme court overturned an earlier extradition ruling.

Steinmetz has said the Romanian trial and sentence were politically motivated. Italy and Greece also refused to carry out Bucharest’s arrest warrant.

The billionaire was handed another bribery conviction in 2021 from a Swiss court following a mining case involving the acquisition of Guinean iron-ore fields. Steinmetz has appealed against the decision.

The scion of a diamond business dynasty, Steinmetz expanded the family fortune in the late 1980s. BSG Resources operates in 25 countries with activities spanning mining, oil and gas, and metals.

A spokesperson for GOI Energy said that “a foundation, whose [ultimate beneficial owners] include members of Mr Steinmetz’s family (but not Mr Steinmetz) is a minority investor in the Argus fund, as it has obviously been fully disclosed to the Italian competent authorities”.

They said that Steinmetz was not an investor in GOI Energy.

Steinmetz’s sons-in-law Ohad and Eder Schwartz jointly own Israel-based Green Oil Israel, which operates the Bazan refinery located in Haifa Bay, northern Israel, according to Israeli records. Bobrov also owns a 50 per cent stake in the Bazan refinery, the records show.

In response to questions, the Italian industry ministry said the golden powers are designed to preserve energy security, adding: “In-depth studies were carried out on the financiers/investors involved . . . as well as on the relationships between Green Oil (Israel) Ltd . . . and members of the Steinmetz family.”

Bakoyannis also assisted Steinmetz in Cyprus as his communications adviser when he was fighting extradition to Romania, according to statements related to the proceedings.

The GOI Energy spokesperson said any questions about Steinmetz’s meetings in Italy with GOI Energy’s lawyers in December 2022 “should be referred to Mr Steinmetz”, adding that Steinmetz “does not in any way represent GOI Energy”. A spokesperson for Steinmetz in Israel, referred to the Financial Times by Bakoyannis, could not comment.

Italian officials said that Rome’s primary focus was to ensure no Russian investors or crude would be secretly channelled back into the refinery.

Under an early bid for the plant, commodity trader Trafigura was going to supply crude and working capital, the people said. Bobrov previously worked for Trafigura as head of the trader’s Israel operations. Trafigura declined to comment.

One Italian who reviewed the Cypriot offer said: “We were comforted by the fact the Cypriot fund had no link to the Russians, and that Steinmetz had a record of running similar operations as his family and Bobrov also own the Bazan refinery in Israel.”

The Cypriot company records show that 76 per cent of GOI Energy is held by Argus New Energy Fund, whose shareholders are two Nicosia-based lawyers. Bobrov owns a 20 per cent stake.

The remaining 4 per cent is evenly split between Completicos Holdings, of which Bakoyannis is a shareholder, and Itzik Gur, according to company records. Gur is an Israeli national who was listed as a Steinmetz “associate” in a New York state court subpoena. Gur could not be reached for comment.

The GOI Energy spokesperson said that Bakoyannis, Bobrov and Gur were “all independent businesspeople . . . with an extensive portfolio of clients, partnerships and collaborations”.

FT : Iran told US it did not want Israel-Hamas war to escalate

Iran told US it did not want Israel-Hamas war to escalate
Hossein Amirabdollahian says Tehran has used back channels to convey fears of conflict in Gaza spreading across region

Iran’s top diplomat has revealed that Tehran told the US through back channels that it did not want the Israel-Hamas war to spread further, but also warned Washington that regional conflict could be unavoidable if Israeli attacks on Gaza continue.

“Over the past 40 days, messages have been exchanged between Iran and the US, via the US interests section at the Swiss embassy in Tehran,” foreign minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said in an interview, while ruling out the possibility of direct talks between the two foes.

“In response to the US,” he added, “we said that Iran does not want the war to spread, but due to the approach adopted by the US and Israel in the region, if the crimes against the people of Gaza and the West Bank are not stopped, any possibility could be considered, and a wider conflict could prove inevitable.”

Iran, the main supporter of anti-Israel Islamist militants in the region, has said it was not informed in advance of Hamas’s devastating attack on Israel on October 7 — a position that US officials have confirmed.

But western states hold Iran responsible for its extensive support for “resistance” groups against the Jewish state — including Hamas and Lebanon’s Hizbollah — which Iran sees as an essential pillar of its security strategy.

Iran’s foreign minister has toured the region since the Gaza war began, a flurry of diplomacy that has taken him to Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. He has also met Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh in Doha and Hizbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.

Amirabdollahian maintained that Hizbollah and other Islamist militants in Palestine, Iraq, Syria and Yemen were not Iran’s proxy forces, saying each had an independent political identity. But he warned that these groups “are not indifferent towards the killing of their Muslim and Arab peers in Palestine”.

In western capitals, there are concerns that Iran could push its proxy forces, notably Hizbollah — the most powerful of the so-called “axis of resistance” — to escalate hostilities in the region.

The US has built up its military presence in the region over the past month, dispatching two carrier strike groups to act as a deterrent.

Amirabdollahian said the US had not threatened that Iran could be hit if Hizbollah launched an all-out assault on Israel. However, he accused Washington of inviting Tehran “to exercise restraint” while it was itself escalating the war in Gaza with massive support for Israel.

He said the US’s messages to Hizbollah similarly urging restraint “would fail to make the resistance group cautious in its decision-making”.

“Our military officials are of the opinion that the deployment of US aircraft carriers near our region, which makes them accessible, is not a strong point for the US. Rather, it makes them more vulnerable to possible strikes,” Amirabdollahian said.

“The war has already expanded in the region,” he added. “The fact that the Yemeni army [Iran-backed Houthi movement] . . . attacks the occupied lands with missiles and drones means the war has begun to expand. The fact that Hizbollah is fighting with a third of the Israeli army shows the war has expanded.”

Gaza, home to 2.3mn people, has been enduring a devastating humanitarian crisis since Israel launched its offensive in response to Hamas’ assault on October 7.

Iran has been calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. But Iranian analysts in Tehran have noted that the war has already created diplomatic opportunities for the country, helping to lessen its political isolation abroad.

The Islamic republic has seized the moment to narrow the gap with Arab and regional leaders, whose pro-Palestinian positions have shifted closer to Iran’s since the war began.

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi travelled to Saudi Arabia’s capital Riyadh at the weekend and met Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the first such visit by an Iranian president in more than a decade.

Raisi also met Egyptian president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi for the first time, on the sidelines of a Riyadh summit of the Organization of Islamic Co-operation on Gaza — a rare meeting between leaders of the two countries, which still do not have full diplomatic relations.

“This war has been a victory in white gloves for Iran,” said one analyst in Tehran. Another said: “Iran has so far successfully stayed away from any direct involvement in the war and improved its relations with Arab states.”

Iranian-backed militant groups have attacked US bases and personnel in Iraq and Syria more than 40 times since the Gaza war began, according to the Pentagon. US officials said the military had in response targeted facilities in Syria used by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iran-affiliated militias.

Amirabdollahian said one of these centres — near al-Bukamal, a town in Syria near the Iraqi border — was formerly used by Iran’s “military advisers in the fight against terrorists, but that place was empty of any Iranian forces or supplies at the time of the attack”.

He added that “no Iranian forces were struck”, noting Iran’s response otherwise would have been “tough”.

Palestinian militias had “never” asked Iran to enter into the war, he said. “They have everything, and they produce missiles and drones themselves. Palestinian resistance groups have the capability to produce the military equipment they need inside Palestine,” he said.

He did not rule out the possibility of a protracted conflict, saying the “real confrontation” in the Hamas-Israel war had only begun in recent days. Should the war drag on, it could benefit militant groups that fight guerrilla-style, rather than Israel with its conventional army, he argued.

Israel on Tuesday began searching the enclave’s largest hospital, al-Shifa, in Gaza City after a land offensive to surround the city, which is Hamas’s main political and military base in the strip. Israel has said the hospital sits on top of underground Hamas command centres.

“It is now the time for a face-to-face confrontation between the Palestinian resistance groups and Israeli forces. This is what the resistance groups have been waiting for for weeks,” said Amirabdollahian.

“The Palestinian resistance sees this phase to its benefit and believes ground invasion means Israel’s paralysis [in Gaza],” he added.

“I can say clearly, considering the knowledge we have and following meetings with leaders in the region, that the fate of this war will be determined by resistance groups, not Israel.”

FT : Oil and gas firms face virtually no extra borrowing costs, S&P finds

Oil and gas firms face virtually no extra borrowing costs, S&P finds
Rating agency says investors ignore ESG when lending to some fossil fuel companies

Oil and gas companies face virtually no extra borrowing costs compared with less polluting firms, despite efforts by climate organisations to encourage banks and big investors to reduce their lending to the fossil fuel sector.

Since 2010, borrowing costs for oil and gas companies in the US and Europe have largely mirrored those for other debt issuers, except for during sharp falls in commodity prices, according to analysis by S&P Global Ratings seen by the Financial Times.

“Environmental concerns seem to be far from the most important factor for funding oil and gas companies,” the rating agency’s analysts said.

Michael Altberg, a managing director at the agency and one of the report’s authors, said: “It shows lenders are not really baking in premiums for [environmental, social and governance]-related factors.”

Climate-related financial initiatives such as the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, a coalition of banks established in 2021 and led by former Bank of England governor Mark Carney and businessman Michael Bloomberg, have “yet to impact capital market access for oil and gas issuers”, S&P found.


This is despite oil and gas accounting for more than half of global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in 2022, according to S&P data, and many European and US banks joining climate initiatives such as the UN-convened Net Zero Banking Alliance to decarbonise the economy.

There is no “premium” for buying bonds issued by oil and gas companies, one credit investor told the Financial Times, adding that their organisation’s environmental, social and governance criteria did not limit investments in bonds issued by fossil fuel companies.

S&P said that more than 40 per cent of banks, financial services firms and insurers have committed to reducing direct emissions from their operations and indirect emissions from the energy they buy, known as scope one and scope two.

But only a fifth have pledged to reduce scope three emissions, which are linked to their investment and lending activities. Restrictions on these emissions could restrict the oil and gas sector’s ability to work with banks to borrow money.

The Net-Zero Banking Alliance, a UN-convened group of leading global banks committed to decarbonisation, is discussing adding emissions related to the services banks provide — such as raising debt and equity on behalf of clients — to its guidelines on climate targets, with members voting on proposed updates to its guidelines in April 2024.

However, the surge in energy prices driven by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has pushed energy security higher up the agenda of policymakers, while record profits from high oil and gas prices have boosted companies’ profits and share prices.

“Oil and gas are not going to go away. They’re going to have a piece of the energy pie, just a bit less of it,” said Thomas Watters, managing director at S&P Global Ratings and another of the report’s authors.

While there has been a fall in new bond issuance from oil and gas companies since 2021, S&P attributed this to firms’ high cash levels, which have also helped them pay down debt. The fall was owing to “lower funding needs as opposed to market access challenges”, it said.

The International Energy Agency, the west’s energy watchdog, recently forecasted that global oil, gas and coal demand will peak before 2030 due to the growth of renewable energy and electric vehicles.

S&P said it expected funding to become more difficult for smaller oil and gas players as global demand for oil and gas falls, but said that borrowing would remain simpler for longer for larger companies.

“The smaller guys aren’t getting the returns that the larger guys are,” said Watters. “As regulation steps up, the money allocation will be given to companies who are making more for the portfolio.”

FT : Ski-home buyers follow the snow in the face of climate change

Ski-home buyers follow the snow in the face of climate change
Snow-surety is the holy grail for buyers, while ski resorts change business models to meet the challenges of volatile weather

“There are amazing runs among the woods where you feel you are alone in the wilderness,” says Bruce Cheung, a Singaporean Wagyu cattle farmer from Western Australia, describing the joy of skiing in Furano, on the northern island of Hokkaido. His two-bedroom holiday apartment there, in the new ski in/ski out Fenix Furano development, sits directly opposite the gondola in the heart of the Kitanomine ski village.

“Furano still has a very special Japanese village feel,” says Cheung. “It’s very popular in summer for its lavender fields and in fall for the cherry blossom, but I’m really just there to ski.”

As impressive as its wilderness is, Furano also rates highly for a reason that is less romantic but highly prized among ski property buyers: reliable weather. Savills’ new Ski Resilience Index, published Friday, ranks 62 international ski resorts for five factors: season length, altitude, temperature, snowfall (based on volumes in the last ski season) and reliability.

The latter is “the standard deviation of snowfall”, says Kelcie Sellers, Savills’ world research associate. “Essentially, can you count on a certain amount of snow each year or are there more varied amounts each year?” Resilience is increasingly important to buyers as climate change brings new challenges to ski resorts.

Furano, which sits at 1,074m and has average winter temperatures of between -5C and -10C, jumped by 25 places in Savills’ new index compared with last year.

While Furano has risen dramatically up the resilience ranks, the Colorado resorts of Aspen and Vail are used to occupying the top spots — not just for their natural assets but their prime property prices (Savills show their average asking prices as €36,200 per sq m and €26,700 per sq m respectively, compared with €8,100 per sq m in Furano). Of the 112 sales in Aspen between January and August this year, two-fifths were for more than $10mn, according to Knight Frank, and six sales in the past 14 months have exceeded $60mn.

However, despite Aspen’s reliably skiable pistes — three-quarters are north-facing and rise to more than 3,400m — the Aspen Skiing Company, which owns and operates four mountains including Aspen Mountain and Aspen Highlands, has partnered with the global Protect Our Winters initiative to help mitigate the effects of climate change on winter sports communities.

Aspen’s year-round cultural and sports scene also helps to future-proof it against warming winters, says Brittanie Rockhill, a broker at Douglas Elliman estate agency. “Our summer economy, one could argue, has boomed due to climate change,” she says, citing visitors from the south who come to the cooler mountain air to escape the summer heat at home.

Ski operator Vail Resorts, meanwhile, which owns 41 mountain resorts worldwide, is not “preparing for more or less snowfall. We are preparing for more change,” says Kate Wilson, the company’s vice-president of environmental and social responsibility, talking of the climatic volatility that is forcing resorts to become more inventive on how to make and preserve snow in ever-warmer temperatures — and to modify their business models to attract skiers. Vail’s Epic Pass, for example, allows holders access to any of its resorts. “It gives skiers the option of going where the snow is,” says Wilson.

For some pass holders, that involves crossing continents. Emily, 38, who preferred not to disclose her real name, works in tech sales in New York and owns an apartment in the Colorado ski resort of Breckenridge (known locally as Breck) with her family. She is one such pass-holder who follows the snow. Andermatt in the Swiss Alps is now included — “and it’s easier for us to get a direct seven-and-a-half hour flight to Zurich overnight, so we can be there by breakfast, than it is for us to get to Breck,” she says, referring to the often slow, snowy drive from Denver airport to Breck.

Val d’Isère — in fourth place in Savills’ index — is the one “outlier” that offers aesthetics and altitude, Bhagat adds. “You have original mountain homes in Savoyard stone and wood, and high altitude, but prices are at an absolute premium.”

Savills places the average asking price in Val d’Isère at €27,700 per sq m and Knight Frank’s latest ski report shows that prime property prices there (based on a four-bedroom chalet in a prime central location) rose by 5.3 per cent in the year up to June 2023. Dominic John, a 58-year-old director of a business coaching company from Buckinghamshire, recently moved from Val d’Isère to La Légettaz, 1km away, to upgrade from a two-bed to a three-bedroom apartment. Costing around €1mn, his new property is “double the size but not double the outlay”, he says, and “still only eight minutes’ walk from the centre”.

He also feels reassured that Val d’Isère’s snowfall is reliable. “Unpredictability is all part of the ski experience, but by having the extra altitude here, I feel less worried than I would if I were a few hundred metres lower. This winter is already looking amazing.”

Val d’Isère may rank highly for reliable snow and property prices, but the correlation between prime property prices and resilience isn’t always so clear-cut.

“Property prices are tied to multiple factors, not solely reliability of snowfall,” says Kate Everett-Allen, Knight Frank’s head of international residential research, adding that “the resort’s cachet, size of ski domain, infrastructure, luxury brands, history, architecture, retail and après-ski offer” all play a part in buyers’ decision-making.

The Italian ski area of Breuil-Cervinia has a disconnect between reliable snow and property values. It comes fifth for its natural assets, but has average property prices of €8,000-€12,000 per sq m compared with €20,000-€40,000 per sq m for the super-prime resorts. Its relative inaccessibility from Geneva and Zurich — four or five hours away by car respectively — may be a contributing factor, says Jeremy Rollason, head of Savills Ski.

“Cervinia has been the preserve of the Italian market for a long time and it’s Zermatt’s poorer cousin from a property price perspective, but not for skiing. The new Matterhorn Glacier Ride II, which is the highest cable car in the Alps, means you can now go from Cervinia to Zermatt on foot,” says Rollason.

He adds that while altitude “comes into the conversation for buyers, it doesn’t always steer where they buy”. Gstaad in the Swiss Alps is an anomaly in the opposite direction to Zermatt: its property prices are high, but its resilience rating is low. “Anyone can buy there, though you need deep pockets. Its reputation and kudos outweigh its lack of resilience,” says Rollason.

Nendaz in Switzerland’s 4 Vallées stands out too, as Savills identifies it as a victim of hotter summers and milder winters taking their toll on ice volumes and season length. Yet prices there — based on a four-bedroom chalet — rose by 8.3 per cent in the year to June 2023, according to Knight Frank.

Another Swiss town, Grimentz, languishes at the bottom of Knight Frank’s price chart, having seen zero price growth in that same period. Yet the resort, which lies at 1,570m with access to skiing at up to 2,900m, scores highly for reliability.

“It was one of the few resorts where you could still ski all the pistes throughout the season last year while much of Europe had very little snow,” says Oscar Pesch, a 55-year-old entrepreneur from The Hague, who has bought a three-bedroom chalet off-plan in Grimentz for SFr2.4mn ($2.65mn), which will be ready in late 2024.

He also loves a morning dip in the nearby glacial Lac de Moiry. “It enables me to connect with nature when I’m there,” he says, describing Grimentz’s picture-postcard ancient village as “a hidden treasure. It’s simple and traditional. You don’t see couture shops like in Zermatt or Gstaad.”

Going by altitude alone is not the safest predictor of snow-surety, though. Climatic conditions can have a sizeable impact. Everett-Allen says lower-altitude Alpine resorts with north-facing grassy slopes, such as Villars-sur-Ollon in Switzerland, can prove more snow-sure than higher, south-facing slopes, such as Nendaz.


“Ski-obsessed” Tom, a London-based banker who preferred not to give his real name, paid SFr2.5mn for his two-bedroom apartment in the Swiss resort of Andermatt Reuss in 2020, says that by choosing a location “that is less busy than the popular resorts I normally skied in, such as the 4 Valleys, the fresh powder lasts longer. On Gemsstock mountain in Andermatt, you can still find fresh tracks a week after the last snowfall.”

Carmen Carfora, a sustainability expert at Andermatt, also describes the lengths the resort goes to protect its snowy pistes, including using wind-powered snow machines, and laying a “fleece blanket system” over its glacier in summer. “About 75 per cent of the fleece-covered snow remains intact over the summer, which saves energy and water,” says Carfora.

“Convenience, ambience and year-round-ability” all play a part in buyers’ decisions of where to buy in the mountains, says Rollason. But for ski lovers, how resorts are future-proofing their offering in the face of a warming climate is a key part of the conversation.

>>> US After Hours Summary: GPS +15.3%, ROST +5.7%, BZH +3.5% higher on earnings

After Hours Summary: GPS +15.3%, ROST +5.7%, BZH +3.5% higher on earnings; AMAT -7.3%, DLB -4.4% lower on earnings; CHPT -27.4% down sharply on revenue cut

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: GPS +15.3%, ROST +5.7%, BZH +3.5%, GLOB +2.1%, FLNC +2% (reaffirms FY23 revenue outlook; names new CFO), POST +1.2%, CPRT +0.5%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: WRAP +7.3% (stock offering by selling shareholders), DDS +4.2% (declares special dividend of $20/sh), ACCD +3% (repurchases $76.5 mln of convertible notes), PRI +3% (authorizes new $425 mln share repurchase program for 2024), BHF +2.5% (authorizes new $750 mln share repurchase program), KRTX +2% (results from Phase 1b trial of KarXT), MKTW +2% (names new COO), CALX +1.5% (increases share buyback auth by $100 mln), BF.B +1.3% (NAPA to acquire Sonoma-Cutrer Vineyards from BF.B for $400 mln), CLX +0.5% (elects CEO Linda Rendle to the role of Chair), MSI +0.4% (increases dividend; also increases share repurchase auth by $2 bln), ORLY +0.4% (increases share repurchase auth by $2 bln), NAPA +0.1% (NAPA to acquire Sonoma-Cutrer Vineyards from BF.B for $400 mln), CXW +0.1% (signs new contract with Wyoming), HBI +0.1% (enters into cooperation agreement with Barington)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: CHPT -27.4% (lowers Q3 revenue guidance substantially; names new CEO; CFO steps down), AMSWA -8.9%, AMAT -7.3% (also co is being probed for shipments sent to China's SMICY according to Reuters), DLB -4.4%, CMP -4.4%, WWD -2.1%, HAYN -1.8%, ESE -1.5%, UGI -0.3%, ZTO -0.1%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: VIGL -11.1% (reports interim data from Phase 2 IGNITE trial), IMNM -5.2% (stock offering by selling shareholders), KLAC -3.4% (in sympathy with AMAT earnings/news), OGS -2.8% (CFO to retire), BLNK -2.8% (in sympathy with CHPT lowered guidance), LRCX -2.2% (in sympathy with AMAT earnings/news), ASML -1.3% (in sympathy with AMAT earnings/news), EVGO -1% (in sympathy with CHPT lowered guidance)