9to5 : Apple likely to announce these five products next spring

Apple likely to announce these five products next spring

Apple just finished releasing the initial M4 Mac lineup, with M4, M4 Pro, and M4 Max going into the iMac, Mac mini, and MacBook Pro. While those are likely the last announcements for the year, there’s still a lot in the pipeline for next spring. Here’s everything to look forward to.

iPhone SE 4
Perhaps the biggest announcement for next spring will be Apple’s most affordable new iPhone: the iPhone SE. This is expected to be the biggest upgrade to the iPhone SE since it debuted in 2016, bringing it up to date with the modern iPhone lineup.

It’s expected to finally be dropping the home button, with a new form factor similar to the iPhone 14. iPhone SE 4 will also be Apple’s first iPhone to integrate an in-house modem, transitioning away from Qualcomm. It’ll also adopt the USB-C connector.

iPad 11
Apple’s cheapest iPad is likely going to get its first update in over 2 years next spring, with the main focus being Apple Intelligence support. The last iPad refresh brought the first redesign to the base iPad since Apple started making budget iPads, so there likely won’t be any design changes.

If it does support Apple Intelligence, it’ll likely be with an A18 chip, although we don’t know for certain. Learn more about Apple’s cheapest iPad in our dedicated guide.

MacBook Air with M4
Although this is going to be a smaller refresh (especially now that Apple added 16GB of RAM to the existing M2 and M3 MacBook Air models), Apple will still be adopting the new M4 chip in the MacBook Air next spring.

We don’t expect any changes outside of the chip upgrade, though it would be cool to get the new Center Stage camera that the latest MacBook Pros have.

M3 iPad Air
This is also going to be a small refresh, but the iPad Air will likely get an update next spring, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. It’ll likely be equipped with an M3 chip, as well as an all new Magic Keyboard just for iPad Air.

All-new smart home product
Apple’s first smart home product with a display is also on track for a spring release, marking Apple’s first HomePod (of sorts) to support Apple Intelligence. It’s expected to be a cheaper display that’s both wall mountable and attachable to speakers. It’ll have a roughly 6-inch square display.

TechCrunch : SpaceX to launch Starship for the sixth time this month (18/11)

SpaceX to launch Starship for the sixth time this month

SpaceX will conduct the sixth flight test of Starship, the largest rocket ever built, as soon as November 18, following the smooth success of the previous mission less than a month ago.

The high flight cadence is thanks, in part, to that success, which included the first-ever return of the Super Heavy booster to the launch site — where massive “chopstick” arms jutting from the launch tower caught it in mid-air — and a controlled, on-target splashdown after suborbital flight of the Starship upper stage in the Indian Ocean. This sixth test includes many of the same objectives; this fact led the Federal Aviation Administration to approve both flight 5 and 6 at the same time last month. Up until this point, SpaceX has needed to wait (sometimes months) for regulatory approval before each Starship launch.

In a post on its website, SpaceX says it will attempt to re-create these same successes on November 18, including catching the booster at the launch site and an accurate Starship splashdown. The company will also continue to test the heat shield and maneuvers for the upper-stage reentry, “to expand the envelope on ship and booster capabilities and get closer to bringing reuse of the entire system online.” Engineers also introduced a number of upgrades to the system, including more redundancy in the booster propulsion system, updated software controls, and other changes.

SpaceX will also attempt to relight one of the Ship’s six Raptor engines on orbit, a key capability to eventually also reuse the Starship upper stage. Engineers will put this stage through its paces in other ways as well: The company will test new secondary thermal protection materials. In addition, as the company put it, “The ship also will intentionally fly at a higher angle of attack in the final phase of descent, purposefully stressing the limits of flap control to gain data on future landing profiles.”

All this testing will culminate in “significant upgrades” to the ship, starting with flight 7, like redesigned flaps, larger propellant tanks, and the most up-to-date thermal protection.

A live webcast of the test will start around 30 minutes before the 30-minute launch window at 2 p.m. PT, which will be viewable on X or SpaceX’s website. This late-afternoon launch window (which opens at 4 p.m. local Texas time) will enable better viewing conditions upon reentry, SpaceX said.

TechCrunch : SpaceX Starship: Everything you’ve ever wondered but were afraid to

SpaceX Starship: Everything you’ve ever wondered but were afraid to ask

SpaceX’s massive Starship rocket has the potential to transform the commercial space economy, ensure America’s position as the global leaders in the space race, and put humans on Mars for the first time. But first it has to get to orbit.

This is becoming much more likely as the Starship test program accelerates and the company demonstrates more and more of the rocket’s powerful capabilities. Yet to many, Starship is still essentially a vanity project from the world’s richest man. This article will attempt to explain the origins of the rocket and where it might be headed.

What is Starship?
Standing at nearly 400 feet tall, Starship is the largest and most powerful rocket ever built. For comparison, the company’s much-used Falcon 9 is 229 feet tall, and the Saturn V that brought Apollo missions to the moon was 363 feet tall.

Starship also represents the reason for SpaceX’s existence: to spread “the light of consciousness,” as Musk puts it, through the solar system, starting with the moon and Mars.

The rocket is composed of two stages: the Super Heavy booster and the second stage, which is also called Starship. At liftoff, the Super Heavy generates an incredible 16.7 million pounds of thrust using its 33 Raptor engines. That’s the amount of power needed to carry upward of 100-150 tons of cargo and crew to low Earth orbit — again, equivalent to the Saturn V but considerably more advanced in several ways.

The biggest change is that Starship is designed to be fully reusable, meaning that eventually both stages would return to the launch site to be rapidly refurbished and reused for the next mission. This would be a first in the history of rocketry. While SpaceX pioneered booster reuse with the Falcon 9 rocket, the upper stage is still left in orbit, to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere.

Reusability, combined with the incredible payload capacity, could drive Starship costs (for SpaceX itself) down to as low as $2 million to $3 million per launch, Musk has claimed. While we don’t have a firm sense of what it costs the company to launch each Falcon 9, because SpaceX’s financials are confidential, they are priced at $69.75 million for the customer.

What are the origins of the Starship program?
Interplanetary travel has been embedded in the DNA of SpaceX practically since its inception. Elon Musk has talked about developing a heavy-lift rocket capable of carrying many tons of mass to low Earth orbit, the moon, and even farther for two decades. As early as 2005, Musk was publicly discussing his plans to build a rocket with a payload capacity of 100 tons to send to low Earth orbit.

The rocket now known as Starship has gone under a few different names: the “BFR” and “BFS” (Big F—ing Rocket/Ship or Big Falcon Rocket/Ship, depending on who you ask); the Mars Colonial Transporter; and the Interplanetary Transport System. In July 2019, the small second-stage prototype called “Starhopper” completed a small hop for the first time; that was followed by the first large-scale demonstrator, called SN15, which completed a high-altitude test flight for the first time in May 2021.

Of course, it hasn’t all been rosy: The company has also exploded a fair few prototypes along the way, and its first and second integrated flight tests in April 2023 and November 2023 ended in fiery midair explosions.

The Starship program has accelerated in recent years thanks to two main changes: the launch and operation of Starlink, SpaceX’s internet satellite constellation, which provides critical revenue to fuel Starship development, and a $4 billion Human Landing System (HLS) award from NASA to develop a version of Starship to land humans on the moon for the Artemis program. Which leads us to the next question …

Why does Starship matter?
Starship is often understood as one billionaire’s pet project, but that is a deep misreading of the purpose of Starship or the role it could play in the future of the space economy.

Regardless of when Starship might enter commercial operations, pretty much every industry expert agrees that it has the potential to fundamentally transform the space economy. As mentioned above, no other launch vehicle has ever been fully reusable, and those that are partially reusable don’t come close to the rocket’s mammoth size and power.

What does that mean? Well, with the ability to launch cargo in bulk essentially solved, one can begin to imagine many incredible and heretofore unthinkable possibilities — provided the rest of the industry can keep up.

Starship isn’t just a linchpin of growth for the commercial space industry. NASA also pinned the hopes of its Artemis program on the massive launch vehicle when it awarded SpaceX the HLS award in 2021, to deliver the crewed Starship capable of landing astronauts on the moon for the Artemis III mission. That award essentially transformed Starship from one company’s ambition into a major part of ensuring America’s continued supremacy in space.

When is the next flight test?
The sixth flight test is currently scheduled for no earlier than November 18. We break down the main flight objectives of the test here. The company will be attempting to re-create the successes of the previous test flight — including catching the Super Heavy booster using “chopstick” arms jutting out from the launch tower — as well as testing upgrades to hardware and software.

So, when are we going to Mars?
According to Musk’s most recent estimate — which it must be said, his estimates have not historically been particularly reliable — Starship will launch to Mars in 2026. That’s the soonest opportunity for an expedient mission according to the position of the two planets’ orbits around the sun. Whether SpaceX will have the rocket ready in time for such a long mission is unclear, chiefly because there are still some major technical challenges to de-risk, like on-orbit refueling.

That’s right: To reach Mars, or even the moon, for that matter, Starship would need to refuel using a Starship tanker that’s hanging out in orbit. That Starship would transfer propellant to the main vehicle before it could continue its journey. Refueling would need to take place a number of times — for Artemis III, SpaceX estimates needing to launch around 10 refueling tankers to orbit prior to that mission.

The Starship that will go to Mars will not look exactly like the ones flying today, Musk told SpaceX employees in April: The interplanetary Starship will likely be as tall as 500 feet, with even more room for crew and cargo.

FT : Novo Nordisk readies trial results for next-generation weight-loss drug

Novo Nordisk readies trial results for next-generation weight-loss drug
Danish company expects data to show that CagriSema cuts weight by 25 per cent in just over a year

Novo Nordisk is preparing to unveil data for a “next generation” weight-loss drug it believes could lead the field of GLP-1 treatments, as drugmakers seek to better the results of blockbuster treatments Wegovy and Mounjaro.

The company expects late-stage data for CagriSema, due to be published next month, to show that the drug cuts weight by 25 per cent in just over a year. That compares with up to 16 per cent from Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy, and up to 22.5 per cent from Eli Lilly’s rival Mounjaro when administered alongside lifestyle interventions such as improved diet, exercise and sleep.

“CagriSema is really important for us. It’s a next-generation product and it has the potential to be best in class,” chief executive Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen told the Financial Times at the release this month of the company’s third-quarter results, adding that he had not yet seen final data for the compound.

The headline trial results will be closely monitored by pharmaceutical industry experts. Shares in Novo Nordisk, which remains Europe’s largest company by market capitalisation, have struggled to keep pace with those of its chief rival in the weight-loss sector, Eli Lilly.

Investor faith in Novo Nordisk’s ability to meet demand for its products has taken a hit, while the company also suffered a setback from disappointing results for an experimental weight loss pill in September.

Pointing to the removal of Wegovy from US shortage lists last week, Jørgensen said the company could meet demand and that share price movements showed “there’s a lot of hype around obesity and maybe misunderstandings about the underlying business position”.

Data on weight-loss drugs has shaken share prices in the pharmaceutical sector, with excitement around the medications dominating assessments of the industry’s prospects in recent years.

Roche shares surged in July when it unveiled early data for its weight-loss pill, only to slide in September on the back of concerns over side-effects.

Should CagriSema fail to deliver on its potential, investors may start to reconsider Novo Nordisk’s ability to lead the weight-loss field, according to Emily Field, an analyst at Barclays.

“This is the most important data point for pharma of the entire year,” she said. “Either Novo has a path into the next decade or they don’t.”

CagriSema combines semaglutide, the active ingredient in the company’s Ozempic and Wegovy that mimics the gut hormone GLP-1, with cagrilintide, a compound based on the pancreatic hormone amylin, in a once-weekly injection.

While Novo Nordisk is not expected to publish detailed data next month, the CagriSema results will be the most advanced for an amylin drug.

This will have wider significance for the field, as other drugmakers develop amylin-based treatments that, like GLP-1, reduce food intake and help the body control blood glucose levels.

Success for CagriSema could boost confidence in companies such as the Danish organisation Zealand Pharma, which is developing a drug based solely on amylin, said Michael Novod, an analyst at Nordea. Its market capitalisation has doubled this year as excitement about the drug class continues to build.

CagriSema is also being tested to treat type-2 diabetes and in a head-to-head trial with Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro, as Novo Nordisk has embarked on record research and development spending to stay ahead of rivals.

A range of approved weight-loss drugs could provide physicians with different options to prescribe to patients who need greater weight loss or who struggle with side-effects. “It’s not going to be a one size fits all,” said Novod.

He added that the data ranked as similarly important to advanced data for Ozempic, Mounjaro and Novo Nordisk’s Select trial that proved the benefits of GLP-1 drugs for treating conditions such as heart disease. “It’s a pivotal moment for the company’s ability to innovate and set a new target for other drugs,” he said.

WSJ : Investors Are Betting on a Market Melt-Up

Investors Are Betting on a Market Melt-Up
They have flocked to stock funds at a pace rarely seen since 2008, but some warn that shares look expensive historically

A roaring market rally since the U.S. presidential election has driven up the price of everything from shares of technology and manufacturing giants to cryptocurrencies. Many investors are betting it has room to run.

Investors have stampeded into funds tracking U.S. stocks and picked up trades that would profit if the rally that recently sent the S&P 500 above 6000 for the first time reaches new heights.

U.S. equity exchange-traded and mutual funds drew nearly $56 billion in the week ended Wednesday, the second-largest weekly haul in records going back to 2008, according to EPFR data. Such funds have drawn inflows for seven consecutive months, the longest streak since 2021, when a dizzying market melt-up sent stocks to repeated records.

Driving the optimism? Many investors said they expect lower taxes and fewer regulations during Donald Trump’s second term as president.

Dominic Rizzo, a technology portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price, said tariffs could boost U.S. manufacturing, driving a surge in domestic spending and investment. Other investors are simply breathing a sigh of relief that the election has passed.

The share of investors surveyed by the American Association of Individual Investors who said they were bullish jumped to 49.8% this past week, while the share of those reporting a neutral sentiment dropped to the lowest level since 2022. About 40% of those surveyed said the U.S. election made them more optimistic about the market.

“Animal spirits are alive and well right now,” Rizzo said.

Rizzo oversees shares of Nvidia and other tech giants. After a big run-up, he is still optimistic about the group ahead of Nvidia’s earnings report Wednesday. Investors are also fixated on the presidential transition and how it might shape the market’s winners and losers.

Some market watchers caution that investors might be too quick to latch on to policies that could boost markets, while ignoring plans that might stir inflation and market volatility.

Stocks wobbled at the end of the past week, and bitcoin retreated. Trump’s appointment of the vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health and human services secretary pressured several stocks including Moderna and Pfizer. Shares of Tesla, which soared after the election and pushed the company’s market cap back above $1 trillion, have stumbled in recent sessions. Shares of Trump Media & Technology Group fell 12% for the week.

Still, the S&P 500 index and the Nasdaq Composite closed Friday within about 3.2% of their respective record highs. With just weeks left in 2024, the S&P 500 is on track to jump more than 20% for the year, the second consecutive year of gains of that magnitude. It is a back-to-back advance that has been seen only three times over the past century, according to Deutsche Bank.

Joe Johnson, 37, said he has waded into hot stocks including Nvidia, Tesla and a crypto play, MicroStrategy. His portfolio has swelled this year, and he is feeling so good about the market that he is thinking about pouring his cash pile into stocks. He is eyeing such industrial giants as Caterpillar and Deere, which he believes will benefit from a strong economy.

“I am bullish on the market,” Johnson said. “The euphoria everyone is feeling is warranted.”

Johnson said he is excited about Trump’s presidency and expects his policies to benefit his small business in Maryland, which sells boat-maintenance kits, engine parts and protective covers.

Many investors have piled into segments of the market such as small companies, which are especially sensitive to the economy.

The Russell 2000 has risen almost 2% since the election, and one of the largest exchange-traded funds tied to the index attracted $3.9 billion in inflows in a single session this month, the most since June 2007. Money managers, meanwhile, have increased positions that would pay out if the rally continued, driving net bullish bets in the futures market to the highest level in more than four years.

Some of the riskiest corners of financial markets are thriving too. Three of the top five days for trading in call options, trades that give the right to buy shares, have occurred this month, according to options records going back to 1973. That has pushed up the cost of bullish trades that would profit if stocks soared.

A frenzy of trading in cryptocurrencies sent bitcoin prices above $90,000 and unleashed a historic rush into crypto funds. Dogecoin, a speculative coin backed by nothing, shot up after Trump revealed plans to create a government-efficiency department called DOGE, to be co-led by Elon Musk, a dogecoin evangelist. Its $55 billion market cap now tops that of Ford Motor.

Trading in the over-the-counter market, which includes riskier securities such as penny stocks, has surged 27% in November from the same time last year, according to OTC Markets Group.

Some said stocks are looking expensive after their recent run. The S&P 500 recently traded at 22 times its expected earnings over the next 12 months, above its five-year average of roughly 20. A Bank of America strategist, Savita Subramanian, called market sentiment and positioning “dangerously bullish” in a note to clients Friday.

Bond investors have been sending a different signal, driving the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield to 4.426% on Friday, up from 4.072% around a month ago. They are banking on bigger deficits and higher inflation in the years ahead. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell indicated Thursday that the central bank will take its time to trim interest rates, pressuring bonds and stocks.

One measure closely tracked by investors, the equity risk premium—or the gap between the S&P 500’s earnings yield and that of 10-year Treasurys—shrank close to zero, the lowest level since 2002, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That means the reward for owning stocks over bonds is dwindling.

“The market is awfully expensive to have a melt-up,” said Rob Arnott, the founder and chairman of Research Affiliates.

WSJ : Warner Bros. Discovery, NBA Settle Legal Battle Over TV Rights

Warner Bros. Discovery, NBA Settle Legal Battle Over TV Rights
Deal gives company access to NBA content and rights in parts of Northern Europe and Latin America; Turner to license ‘Inside the NBA’ to ESPN

Warner Bros. Discovery WBD -6.49%decrease; red down pointing triangle has settled its breach of contract lawsuit against the National Basketball Association, an agreement that will keep the company in business with the league for at least the next decade, people familiar with the matter said.

The accord gives Warner Bros. Discovery the ability to develop new shows with NBA content in the U.S. and abroad, and international NBA rights in parts of Northern Europe and Latin America excluding Mexico and Brazil.

The deal is expected to be announced early next week.

While Warner Bros. Discovery is losing rights to regular and postseason games for its TNT network after this season, the settlement will give it rights to a significant amount of NBA content domestically and abroad, the people said, and the league will avoid a continued legal battle in court.

Warner Bros. Discovery’s efforts to retain some NBA content even after losing its grip on a long-held rights package underscores how valuable live sporting events are and the lengths media companies will go to keep a piece of the action for their cable and streaming customers.

The company sued the NBA in July after the league signed new rights deals with Disney’s ESPN, Comcast’s NBCUniversal and Amazon.com valued at nearly $80 billion over 11 years. Warner Bros. Discovery alleged that the league violated a matching-rights clause with its TNT cable network by making a deal to put games on Amazon’s Prime Video.

Legal discovery had begun in that case.

Warner Bros. Discovery’s digital platforms, Bleacher Report and House of Highlights, will continue to have access to NBA content. House of Highlights, which focuses on big moments in games, often in near real time, is seen as a potential global growth property for Warner Bros. Discovery, similar to the NFL’s RedZone channel, which shows live action from games.

The company will continue to partner on the NBA’s digital operations for the next several years. That portion of the deal will provide Warner Bros. Discovery with about $350 million in revenue over the length of the agreement, for services, promotion, programming and marketing, people familiar with the terms said.

The new rights deals go into effect next year and would end TNT’s more than three decades as a home for NBA games. Warner Bros. Discovery’s settlement runs 11 years, which is the same term as the league’s rights deals with Disney, Amazon and NBCUniversal.

Separately, Warner Bros. Discovery struck a deal with Disney to license the TNT show “Inside the NBA” to ESPN and ABC starting next season, according to the people familiar with the matter. The show, which features the former players Charles Barkley and Shaquille O’Neal, has an enthusiastic and large following. The show will air throughout the course of the season.

In addition, these people said, ESPN will sublicense Big 12 conference college football and basketball games to Warner Bros. Discovery that it can air on TNT, as well as on its Max streaming service.

That agreement follows a similar five-year deal the two struck in March to share College Football Playoff games, starting with the current season.

The addition of college football, and a new deal for Nascar, are part of the company’s efforts to fill the void that will be left by the departure of the NBA.

Warner Bros. Discovery has major distribution deals coming up and is fighting hard to keep the fees it gets for TNT on par with their current monthly value of around $3 a subscriber. In September, Warner Bros. Discovery signed a new distribution agreement with Charter Communications, the largest pay-TV distributor in the U.S. that kept the TNT price at its current rate, The Wall Street Journal reported.

FT : Namibia seeks to double GDP growth from oil and gas finds

Namibia seeks to double GDP growth from oil and gas finds
Energy minister Tom Alweendo eyes economic boon as population grows restive ahead of elections

Namibia could double its annual GDP growth to 8 per cent within a decade and reduce its dependence on diamonds because of new offshore oil and gas finds, according to the southern African country’s mining and energy minister Tom Alweendo.

Alweendo’s party Swapo, in power since independence in 1990, hopes the promise of riches from big energy discoveries in the past five years — which have lured TotalEnergies, Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Galp to Namibia — will help it win the November 27 election.

But dissatisfaction with the economy among Namibia’s 3mn people has been rising, increasing the risk for Swapo that it could lose its parliamentary majority as its fellow “liberation parties” did in neighbouring South Africa and Botswana this year.

“If these oil finds are developed to their potential, Namibia could easily double its GDP [growth]. And that’s huge,” said Alweendo in an interview with the Financial Times, when asked about the growth rate.

“But the major focus for us will be on how this resource could help improve the livelihood of the average Namibian.” 

Alweendo — an influential leader of Swapo who in 1997 became the first Namibian governor of the country’s central bank — cited the cautionary tales of Angola and Nigeria, which both discovered oil decades ago, but which still suffer from high poverty rates.

“Hopefully, Namibia has learnt enough lessons from others. So, we plan to use these discoveries to create other economic opportunities, and we will insist on strong governance,” he said.

Namibia’s government has faced criticism over its inability to address unemployment of about 20 per cent and high inequality — second only to South Africa — despite its diamond wealth.

Teresia Kaukuhowa, professor at Namibia’s University of Science and Technology, said other elections in the region this year were swayed by economic frustrations. “Namibia’s leaders should heed this sentiment and direct potential oil and gas revenues towards inclusive policies, such as labour-intensive job creation.”  

Alweendo said the government had made inroads into inequality, but not fast enough for a population that has doubled in three decades. He conceded this presented a risk for Swapo.

“What we’ve seen in elections elsewhere in Africa this year, it’s all about the economy. People worry about the livelihoods and people are no longer willing to just vote [for] a party because his father did, and his grandparents before that,” he said.

He said Namibia needed to “fast-track” the oil and gas finds — with production potentially beginning as early as 2027 —  so that the resulting revenue could be passed on soon. “We all want fast-tracked oil and gas developments,” he added.

In part, that is because Namibia’s budget has taken a hit from falling prices of mined diamonds, which until now provided about half of the country’s export earnings. Their value has fallen as lab-produced diamonds became more common.

Paul Eardley-Taylor, southern Africa oil and gas expert at Standard Bank, said these discoveries were significant enough to potentially reshape Namibia’s economy.

He said energy data group Wood Mackenzie estimated they included 8.9bn barrels of oil equivalent, “which is sizeable”. “But only 11 wells have been drilled so far, so we could see that number increase sharply in the next few years,” Eardley-Taylor said.

He cited Guyana in South America, which discovered oil in 2015 — seven years before Namibia — and whose GDP grew 62 per cent in 2022 and 38 per cent last year, with 42 per cent growth expected this year. 

“Guyana represented the biggest emerging market offshore discovery in recent times, but potentially Namibia’s reserves could be even larger,” he said.

Eardley-Taylor said Alweendo’s target of fast-tracking production to 2027 was “not impossible”, but would depend on how accessible the oil is in shallower waters, and the flexibility of legislation.

Analysts say Namibia’s natural resources will play a big role in the election. 

“A lot of Namibians feel that, 34 years after independence, their lives haven’t improved that much economically, despite resources like diamonds and uranium,” said political analyst Ndumba Kamwanyah. “People are sceptical that the new discoveries of oil and gas, as well as green hydrogen, will benefit the majority.”

The signs for Swapo are ominous, he said. in the 2019 election, Swapo lost its two-thirds majority for the first time, while support for late president Hage Geingob plunged from 87 per cent to 56 per cent. It lost further ground in 2020 local elections.

This time Swapo has nominated Nandi-Ndaitwah Netumbo as president, who would be the first female head of state.

“It is possible that Swapo may still win the election, but it will not be a landslide. And if there’s no clear winner, and there is a run-off, that would be bad news for Swapo,” said Kamwanyah.

Namibia’s government also faces pressure from environmental activists. The country is rich in renewables, in the form of sun and wind.

“In the end, we all want climate justice,” said Alweendo. “But is there any justice in saying to Namibia, don’t develop this find, when other countries have benefited from this [oil and gas] for decades? If Africa were to monetise all its fossil fuels, it would still contribute less than 5 per cent of global emissions.”

FT : Trading assets at US banks cross $1tn for first time since financial crisis

Trading assets at US banks cross $1tn for first time since financial crisis
Much of the increase has been in equities but exposure to structured credit has been growing as well

The trading accounts of US banks topped $1tn in the third quarter — their highest level in more than 16 years and close to an all-time high — as the nation’s largest financial firms seek to profit from rebuilding their market-making businesses.

That growth has at the same time left the banks, particularly the largest ones, more exposed to market moves than at any time since the financial crisis as they hold ever-greater inventories of price-sensitive securities.

Their trading accounts last peaked at just over $1tn, slightly higher than today, in the first quarter of 2008, according to industry tracker BankRegData. That was just a few months before the bursting of the housing bubble that led to a credit crunch, cratered markets and sent the US into a significant recession.


“You see the cash that the banks had sitting on the sidelines flowing recently into their trading books,” said Bill Moreland, who runs BankRegData, which compiled the trading data from the bank’s regulatory filings with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. “It is a bet on financial assets, rather than say lending or the economy, because that’s where they see the returns.”

Trading was a key source of the bank instability that contributed to taxpayer-financed bailouts in the financial crisis, as desks took proprietary directional bets that turned against them. After the crisis, lawmakers adopted rules that prohibited banks from speculating with house money and required that trading facilitate client business.

Nearly all of the trading activity in the US banking industry remains concentrated at the nation’s largest banks. The biggest is JPMorgan Chase, which had $506bn, roughly half the industry total, in its trading account at the end of the third quarter, up from $329bn at the beginning of the year, according to its FDIC filings.

But all of the big lenders, including Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, have boosted their trading assets this year, according to data logged with the FDIC.

Trading accounts at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, which generate more of their income from Wall Street activity than lending, are the highest they have been in years.

The biggest jump, for all the banks, has been in plain-vanilla equity holdings. JPMorgan’s stock market traders held $190bn in securities, more than double the $85bn they had at the beginning of the year.

But bank trading desks also have increased their holdings of asset-backed securities. These have been among Wall Street’s hottest financing markets this year, such as bonds comprised of consumer debt like credit cards and auto loans.

Despite the jump in assets, executives and industry analysts say the banks’ trading businesses are significantly less risky than they were prior to the financial crisis.

They say much of the activity that the big banks carry out is either on behalf of their clients or to facilitate client trades. The Dodd Frank Act and other post-financial crisis legislation have made it hard for banks, as they once did, to make proprietary bets or to put their depositors funds at risk.

For example, value-at-risk — or VaR — assessments, which estimate how much a bank could lose in the market in any one day, in most cases stand at levels that are half of where they were before the financial crisis.

And while trading assets are up, they still only make up 4 per cent of the banking industry’s total assets, and about half of what they were as a percentage of assets back in 2008.

“Generally the business of banks these days is to sell the securities and investment to others, not to hold it themselves,” said Christopher Whalen, a veteran bank analyst at Institutional Risk Analyst. “But activity is up and can’t sell everything you want.”

FT : Car transporters face big costs and fines from German safety standards

Car transporters face big costs and fines from German safety standards
Industry says new rules on how vehicles are lashed to trailers are latest example of cumbersome red tape

European car transporters face hundreds of thousands of euros in costs and potential fines after the introduction of German standards on how vehicles are lashed to trailers.

The rules are an example of the web of red tape faced by businesses in Europe and which are to blame for the bloc’s slowing economy and waning global competitiveness, critics say.

Car transport companies say they were only given one week’s notice of the new standards, which were introduced in September and require them to meet more stringent standards for the straps and wheel blocks that secure cars to their trucks, in order to travel on Germany’s roads.

The rules were set by the German engineering body VDI. But its standards are used across Europe because of Germany’s leading role in the car manufacturing supply chain and because the country is the main transit point for car transporters travelling from eastern Europe to western European ports and markets.

Technical experts at VDI have requested that Brussels make the rules a European standard. But their complexity has tapped into wider anxiety about a pile-up of red tape and compliance costs for those doing business in the EU.

In a report published in April, former Italian prime minister Enrico Letta blamed “gold-plating” of existing EU guidelines for the “fragmentation of the single market . . . increasing difficulties and multiplying obstacles to productive activity”.

Frank Schnelle, executive director of European vehicle logistics industry body ECG, said: “We do not understand why we need this extra guideline, which is an administrative burden and which costs money, when [the previous rules] worked for the past 30 years.”

Under the new VDI standard, cars must be secured to transporters with more straps and the wheel blocks and rails on which they sit must be strengthened. For the first time it also requires that trucks are certified as meeting the guidelines.

The VDI says the changes are necessary because of the increased weight of electric vehicles compared with conventional cars and the age of Europe’s transporter fleet, with many trailers approaching 20 years old.

But transporters say the concerns are unfounded. “We have been transporting Tesla [electric vehicles] for eight years or more,” Schnelle said.

A VDI spokesperson told the Financial Times the previous standard introduced in 2009 “no longer reflected the current state of the [technology], especially given innovations in the automotive market. While compliance with the new rules would require “adjustments”, it said, “they are necessary to maintain safety”.

The impact on transporters ranges from set-up costs to increased loading times that would eat into already tight deadlines for drivers, trucking companies said. Depending on the design of trailers, some may have to carry fewer cars, cutting into profits, Schnelle said.

Wolfgang Goebel, a board member at German logistics company Mosolf, estimated that the rule change could increase loading times by up to five minutes per car, adding about 40 minutes to every journey.

Goebel said the short notice meant the industry “had to do everything at one moment, which [involved] extra cost”.

The car transport sector was only just beginning to recover following a post-Covid slowdown in vehicle manufacturing as a result of semiconductor shortages, the ECG said. In response, many transporters have cut capacity and laid off drivers.

Rene Eisbrich, chief operations officer at Austrian transporter Lagermax Autologistik, said that upgrading his company’s fleet of 500 trucks would cost about €1mn. Another big challenge was the backlog of orders for new lashings that meant transporters were forced to risk fines by running non-compliant trucks.

“Technically we are not able to comply because the needed equipment is not on the market . . . We need 25 per cent more wheel blocks and 30 per cent more lashes per truck, and across the European fleet that means thousands of lashes and wheel blocks,” he said.

Two of his trucks had already been pulled over by police in Austria and faced penalties, he added.

Schnelle said the cost of certifying trailers more than 20 years old could stretch to about €30,000 for each.

Kurt Garrez, head of car securing for the Belgian federal police, said Belgian law required truck companies to comply with the VDI standard if car manufacturers requested it.

If they did not do so, drivers would face fines of up to €1,000 or be forced to pull over and put the cars on to an alternative truck.

It would be easier for the standard to be applied Europe-wide, he said. “The problem is it’s not always the same in Europe, but transport has to pass borders so it’s important for EU countries to have the same rules.”