WSJ : Boeing Machinist Strike Adds Cash Crunch to New CEO’s Rescue Mission

Boeing Machinist Strike Adds Cash Crunch to New CEO’s Rescue Mission
Ratings firms are warning that a prolonged work stoppage could sink the jet maker’s debt into junk status

A tough job just got much tougher for Boeing’s BA -3.69%decrease; red down pointing triangle new CEO.

When the jet maker’s largest union went on strike Friday, the walkout compounded the list of problems facing Kelly Ortberg, who took Boeing’s top job five weeks ago. Among them: rapid cash burn, a struggling supply base and a manufacturing quality crisis.

Hours after the walkout, debt-ratings firms warned that a prolonged work stoppage would prompt them to downgrade Boeing debt into junk status. With more than $45 billion in net debt, a ratings hit would drive up borrowing costs and hamper fundraising efforts.

Boeing shares on Friday fell nearly 4%, nearing a two-year low.

The jet maker burned through more than $1 billion a month in the year’s first half and warned in July that the company would burn between $5 billion and $10 billion in cash this year. Largely to blame is Boeing’s slowed production of the 737 as the company works to address quality issues after a door plug blew off in midair on an Alaska Air flight in January.

The company is struggling with production slowdowns on other models, too, because of supplier shortages and other issues. Its defense business, which makes F-15 jet fighters and Chinook helicopters for the Pentagon, is also unprofitable. Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft faces an uncertain future after technical issues left two astronauts stuck on the International Space Station.

Thousands of machinists walked off the job shortly after midnight Pacific time Friday, rejecting a labor deal struck between the union’s leaders and Boeing executives. The tentative contract had offered a 25% wage increase over four years.

On Friday, Boeing finance chief Brian West said the strike—overwhelmingly approved by the 33,0000 members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers union chapter—took the company by surprise given that union leaders had unanimously signed off on the deal.

He said Ortberg spent last week visiting factories and is focused on coming up with a new deal workers would approve. The parties are scheduled to resume discussions on Tuesday—this time with a federal mediator.

“His priorities are to reset, re-engage and rebuild,” West said Friday at an investor conference.

A looming credit-rating cut
Ortberg is short on time.

Ratings firm Fitch said a one- or two-week strike likely wouldn’t affect Boeing’s rating, but anything longer could. Moody’s cited cash-flow concerns in placing all of Boeing’s credit ratings on review for possible downgrades. Both firms currently rate Boeing one notch above junk status.

Each bond-ratings drop would cost Boeing an extra $100 million in annual interest payments, Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu estimated. The company has paid more than $2 billion in interest in the past year.

West, speaking Friday, said the company was giving priority to its investment-grade rating.

Ortberg last week took to Boeing’s factory floors, speaking and listening to workers there in hopes of avoiding a strike. He acknowledged in a letter to union members that Boeing’s mistakes contributed to its current situation.

Jon Holden, the union chapter’s president, said Ortberg was in a tough position as a newcomer trying to mitigate years of animosity between the union and Boeing leadership. Longtime machinists are angry about union concessions over the past 16 years that have eroded retirement and health benefits. Recent hires, meanwhile, point to the ever-increasing cost of living and the company’s stagnant starting wages.

“It’s hard to make up for 16 years,” Holden said. “And I think that’s the position he was in.”

Risks for suppliers
A prolonged stoppage would hit suppliers, which had just begun to recover from shutdowns caused by the pandemic and the 20-month grounding of Boeing’s 737 MAX after fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019. Shutdowns have lingering effects, particularly on smaller parts makers that are forced to cut jobs when orders dry up and then must rehire and retrain workers.

To avoid that dynamic, Boeing largely refrained from cutting parts orders despite its own production slowdown. That means the company is holding billions of dollars in inventory of unused parts.

West, the finance chief, said that as soon as the strike started, Boeing told suppliers to stop sending parts if the company had sufficient inventory.

“If you’re not behind, we have safety stock. Don’t deliver anymore,” he said.

Ortberg, an aerospace veteran who ran one of Boeing’s big suppliers, Rockwell Collins, succeeded former Chief Executive Dave Calhoun, who said in March that he would step down. During the monthslong search, several high-profile candidates turned down the chance to run the company.

GE Aerospace CEO Larry Culp, widely considered a natural for the job, declined Boeing’s request to consider taking over. David Gitlin, the current chief executive of manufacturer Carrier Global, also removed himself from the list of potential contenders.

RBC analyst Ken Herbert said Ortberg must resolve the strike in a week to avoid tarnishing his reputation. The strike pressures Boeing leaders, he said, but shouldn’t derail Ortberg’s long-term efforts to make changes at the company.

“Not the start expected for new CEO Ortberg,” he said in a research note.

VanityFair : The Richest Man in Germany Is Worth $44 Billion. The Source of His

The Richest Man in Germany Is Worth $44 Billion. The Source of His Family Fortune? The Nazis Know.

Klaus-Michael Kuehne, born in 1937, has more money than Ken Griffin, MacKenzie Scott, or François Pinault. Just don’t ask him how he got so rich.

Klaus-Michael Kuehne, honorary chairman of Kuehne + Nagel, boasts a net worth of about $44 billion. His father, Alfred Kuehne (inset), ran the logistics company before him, making his fortune in part by transporting looted Jewish property during World War

I. A DIRTY BUSINESS

On a Thursday afternoon in mid-November 2023, an elderly man was walking through Hamburg’s Ohlsdorf Cemetery, the world’s fourth-largest graveyard, to visit the burial place of his favorite soccer player when he noticed something very wrong. Someone had sprayed “Nazi Kapital” (“Nazi fortune”) on the Kuehne family’s tombstone, in red and black, while the cryptic term “M-Aktion” was tagged on Alfred Kuehne’s tombstone.

These weren’t just any family tombs: The Kuehne dynasty is industrial royalty in Germany. Klaus-Michael Kuehne, the only child of Alfred and Mercedes Kuehne, is the country’s wealthiest person, with a fortune estimated at $44 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The 87-year-old billionaire owes his fortune to Kuehne + Nagel, the world’s largest freight forwarder, founded by Kuehne’s grandfather and Friedrich Nagel in 1890. Kuehne has used his wealth to build up a global transportation empire. He is also the largest shareholder of the German airline Lufthansa, shipping behemoth Hapag-Lloyd, chemicals distributor Brenntag, Hamburg soccer club HSV, and the company that owns North America’s Greyhound bus lines. In 2023 alone, according to Bloomberg, he stood to pocket $4.5 billion in dividends from his empire.

In the context of Germany’s discreet but clubby old money, where aristocratic and industrialist heirs mingle at hunting parties or go skiing in the Alps, Kuehne is a loner. Despite his billions, he remains outside Germany’s power circles and is only spotted occasionally at financier and merchant hangouts such as Hamburg’s Übersee-Club, a century-old private members establishment founded by the city’s Warburg banking dynasty. Kuehne, who once described himself as “exhausting, impatient, and unpleasant” to work with, prefers to keep to himself, either at his estate and office near Lake Zurich, at his chalet in the Swiss Alps, on his yacht, or at his villa on Mallorca, to which he flies commercial. Despite having been based in Switzerland for almost 50 years, Kuehne has said his roots remain in his hometown, Hamburg, where he was born and raised.
Nazi graffiti on the Kuehne family gravestone at Ohlsdorf cemetery in 2023.PICTURE ALLIANCE/GETTY

Kuehne is so devoted to Hamburg that he has become its largest private investor and philanthropist in recent years, even though he spends most of his time outside the city of 1.8 million residents, Germany’s second largest. The billionaire has invested more than 100 million euros in HSV and another 100 million euros in the development of The Fontenay, a luxury hotel in Hamburg. (He also owns the five-star hotel Castell Son Claret on Mallorca.) He has donated more than 70 million euros to the Kuehne Logistics University, a private business school in Hamburg, and gave millions to help build Hamburg’s philharmonic, which resides in a Herzog & de Meuron–designed concert hall. Kuehne is negotiating with Hamburg’s senate to finance the building of a new opera house and told the city’s largest newspaper in 2023 that his charitable foundation is willing to contribute up to 300 million euros for the construction.

Kuehne’s public appearance has remained virtually the same over the years. A hulking figure in a suit, he has ice-gray hair that looks like it’s been parted with a ruler; his eyes look straight ahead; his facial features are strong, including his prominent overbite. He met his wife, Christine, a cheerful woman with short blond hair, late in life, on a holiday in the Swiss mountains. They married in December 1989 when he was 52 and she was 51. Kuehne writes poems by hand to her for their wedding anniversary and her birthday, he told the German newspaper Die Zeit. She sometimes spontaneously serenades him with arias by Puccini. Neither of them like men with beards, according to the tabloid Bild. Which is why a captain of their Benetti-built 130-foot yacht, Chrimi III (which stands for Christine and Michael), had to shave before being hired.

The only person he reveres more than his wife is his late father, Alfred, whom he succeeded as Kuehne + Nagel CEO when he was 29. In 1975 Klaus-Michael and his father moved Kuehne + Nagel’s corporate seat and headquarters from Germany to Schindellegi, a Swiss hillside hamlet near Zurich, for tax reasons. The only decoration on the wall of the Kuehne + Nagel boardroom is a portrait of Alfred. “I learned the most from him,” Kuehne has said about his father. “Companies have to be managed individually—like a family business.”

The thing about Alfred is that he built part of the family business profiting from the Nazi regime’s persecution and genocide of European Jews. After Adolf Hitler seized power in Germany, Alfred and his brother Werner, Klaus-Michael’s uncle, ousted their Jewish shareholder from Kuehne + Nagel. During World War II, Kuehne + Nagel, led by Alfred and Werner, transported looted Jewish property, primarily furniture, books, and art, from occupied Western Europe to Nazi Germany as part of the so-called “M-Aktion,” an abbreviation of “Möbelaktion,” which translates to “furniture operation.” Over two years, between 1942 and 1944, almost 70,000 homes belonging to Jews in the Netherlands, France, Belgium, and Luxembourg were systematically looted after their inhabitants had been deported by train to ghettos and death camps. The task force overseeing the operation was part of a Nazi organization dedicated to appropriating property during the war, named after Alfred Rosenberg, the Nazi Party’s chief ideologue. After the war, the Kuehne brothers may have escaped punishment for their activities during the Third Reich because of their ties to American, British, and German intelligence agencies.

Kuehne + Nagel had a quasi-monopoly on the furniture operation, according to Frank Bajohr, head of the Center for Holocaust Studies at the Institute of Contemporary History in Munich. “Even in the most remote places, the company doing the furniture transports was always Kuehne + Nagel,” says Bajohr. “Kuehne + Nagel is in the same category of firms like the ones that sold Zyklon B for use in the gas chambers or that built the crematoria in the extermination camps. Transporting the stolen goods of people after they were deported,” he adds, “is a kind of dirty business far beyond anything I can comprehend.” Yet the role of Klaus-Michael Kuehne’s firm and family in the Third Reich is little known to the outside world.

Big German firms such as Deutsche Bank, Volkswagen, and Bertelsmann opened their archives years ago to allow historians to examine their own lucrative Nazi collaborations. The commissioned studies unearthed that Deutsche Bank aided the expropriation of hundreds of Jewish-owned businesses and helped finance the construction of Auschwitz; that tens of thousands of men and women were used as forced and slave laborers to mass-produce weapons at the Volkswagen factory; and that Bertelsmann published antisemitic literature and exploited Jewish slave labor. In 2000 the three firms joined more than 6,500 German companies, including Kuehne + Nagel, in agreeing to pay about $2.5 billion to a reparations fund that provided financial compensation to surviving forced and slave laborers. But Kuehne + Nagel has never opened its archives.

In 2022 Kuehne told the Swiss newspaper SonntagsZeitung that no company documents from the Nazi era were available, claiming that the company archives in Hamburg and Bremen were destroyed by Allied bombings in World War II. An index of German company archives from the 1990s shows that at least 10 meters (30 feet) of archival files should be present at Kuehne + Nagel. This most likely includes material from before and during World War II, as the collection begins in 1902, according to Kuehne + Nagel’s index page. “Use only possible with management approval,” it says on the page.

Kuehne also said in the SonntagsZeitung interview that he finds commissioning independent historians to investigate his company history akin to blackmail. “We were approached by some who would have liked to do this and they asked for several hundred thousand euros. They said we were obliged to do it. I found that almost a bit extortionate,” Kuehne told the Swiss newspaper. “So I said, ‘We won’t do that. We have nothing to hide, we acknowledge our guilt.’ ”

What Kuehne has not explained is why he won’t release the study that sources say he commissioned.

In early 2014 Kuehne commissioned Handelsblatt Research Institute, the independent research arm of German newspaper Handelsblatt, to conduct a study of his family firm’s entire history for Kuehne + Nagel’s 125th anniversary in July 2015. Researchers were even given access to the company archive in Hamburg and a guarantee of academic freedom and independence, according to people familiar with the matter. But when the final result was sent to Kuehne in early 2015, including a chapter on the activities of his father, uncle, and firm during the Third Reich, he refused to have the study published. Kuehne rejected the study by saying “my father wasn’t a Nazi” during a phone conference, according to people familiar with the conversation. When the researchers refused to change the chapter, according to these sources, Kuehne said the study wouldn’t be published and ended the call. The 180-page study, contractually owned by Kuehne + Nagel, remains unpublished and inaccessible. Jan Kleibrink, the managing director of Handelsblatt Research Institute, would neither confirm nor deny Kuehne’s commissioning and shelving of the study.

Kuehne declined to be interviewed for this article. Dominique Nadelhofer, the spokesperson for the billionaire, his holding company, his foundation, and Kuehne + Nagel, declined to answer detailed questions sent by VF. “Mr. Kuehne was seven years old at the end of World War II and therefore had nothing to do with the war,” Nadelhofer wrote in an emailed statement. “He is now 87 years old and, again, these historical events are beyond his control.”

II. THE POLITICS OF MEMORY

For decades Germany’s political leaders have accepted moral responsibility and acknowledged the sins of the Nazi past, centering remembrance as a component of German society. But recently the country has seemed to regress. As the last witnesses to the Nazi era die and the cultural memory of the Third Reich fades, the right wing, increasingly mainstream, has attacked Germany’s progressive ideals. For much of 2023, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) polled as the largest party, hitting an all-time high of 23 percent in the polls in December. In June 2024 the AfD won a record number of votes in the European parliament elections. The party captured 16 percent of the German vote and came in second in the elections as concerns about immigration and the economy fanned voter discontent.

“Hitler and the Nazis are just a speck of bird shit in over a thousand years of successful German history,” the AfD’s then coleader Alexander Gauland said in a 2018 speech. The AfD’s extremist wing is associated with antisemitism, Islamophobia, and historical revisionism, including the downplaying of Nazi crimes and denigration of the Holocaust. In May and July 2024, Björn Höcke, a leading AfD politician and founder of its extremist wing, was fined twice by a German court for using the banned Nazi slogan “Everything for Germany!” in his campaign speeches. Höcke has lamented the construction of a Holocaust memorial in central Berlin. Calling Germans “the only people in the world who planted a memorial of shame in the heart of their capital,” he has demanded a “180-degree turn” in the country’s “politics of memory.”

Kuehne’s politics could be described as free-market conservative. “I believe that support for the AfD will dwindle again,” he told German newspaper Welt in 2017. “Right-wing movements have no foothold in Germany.” Since 2021 he has donated about 200,000 euros ($220,000) to the Christian conservative CDU, the establishment party for German business and of former chancellor Angela Merkel. Kuehne even once said he could envision himself voting for the left-wing Green Party.

But Kuehne’s refusal to more publicly reckon with his family and firm’s Nazi past plays into the hands of the revisionist movement, says Henning Bleyl, director of the Heinrich Böll Foundation in Bremen, a think tank affiliated with the German Green Party. He has been investigating Kuehne + Nagel’s wartime activities since 2015. These revisionist narratives of Germany’s past are prominently embodied by the AfD, but the far right in Germany, Austria, France, and many other European countries use historical revisionism to manipulate the narrative around the Nazi era and World War II to advance their political agenda.

“Even in past decades, it was unacceptable that Kuehne refused to deal honestly with his family’s actions during the Nazi era,” said Bleyl in an interview on the roof terrace above his office in Bremen. “Now it is even more of an issue because, as I view it, Kuehne’s stance places him in the ranks of those who want to ‘exonerate’ German history from its Nazi past.”

III. “A SO-CALLED ARYANIZATION”

Interviews and newly unearthed archival material by VF in Amsterdam, Bremen, Hamburg, Munich, Montreal, and Washington, DC, detail the extent of Nazi profiteering by the Kuehne brothers and firm. Alfred and Werner Kuehne began profiting from the persecution of Jews much earlier than is known: years before World War II and mere months after Hitler seized power in Germany on January 30, 1933.

In late April of that year, the Kuehne brothers ousted their Jewish partner and co-owner Adolf Maass after he’d spent more than 30 years at the firm. Maass, 57 at the time, owned 45 percent of the Hamburg branch of Kuehne + Nagel, which he had founded in 1902 and which was the largest and most profitable part of the firm. When Friedrich Nagel died heirless in 1907, his shares went to his cofounder, August Kuehne, the father of Alfred and Werner. He died in 1932.

According to a signed and dated contract in the Maass family archive in the Montreal Holocaust museum, Maass signed over his shares and claims to the Kuehne brothers on April 22, 1933, for no compensation. The reason? An alleged inability “to fulfill his capital obligations” to the Kuehnes and the company. Such accusations became a common method in Nazi Germany to oust Jewish shareholders from their own firms. “This wasn’t a free and regular business contract,” says Frank Bajohr. “The Kuehnes used the political situation for their own benefit. It’s no accident that this contract was formulated in spring 1933. Maass wouldn’t have signed this contract in the years before Hitler took power. This was a so-called Aryanization.”

“The constitutional element of an Aryanization contract was that Jewish ownership was completely eliminated and that the company was handed over in its entirety to non-Jewish owners,” says Bajohr. “In this case, the Kuehnes.”

Nine days after ousting Maass, the Kuehne brothers became Nazi Party members, according to their denazification files in the Bremen state archive. In the following years the Kuehnes developed their firm into a “national-socialist model company,” an honorary title that the Nazi regime awarded to Kuehne + Nagel in 1937, the year that Klaus-Michael was born. The Kuehne brothers would declare in their denazification proceedings that Maass’s “Jewish origin caused serious trouble” for the firm and themselves. The siblings claimed that Maass left voluntarily and that they “derived no personal economic advantage from dissolving the partnership.”


In 1938 Kuehne + Nagel acquired the Hamburg subsidiary of the Czech transport company Alfred Deutsch. The owner was Leo Lewitus, a Jewish entrepreneur forced to sell his firm by the Nazi authorities in tandem with the Kuehne brothers. In 180 pages of correspondence during the acquisition discovered by VF in the Hamburg state archive, Kuehne + Nagel managers wrote matter-of-factly that the takeover was an Aryanization.

The start of World War II offered the Kuehne brothers the first opportunity for foreign expansion. In the footsteps of the Wehrmacht’s military conquest of Europe, Kuehne + Nagel grew rapidly: The transportation firm went from seven branches in Germany in early 1939 to 26 branches across Nazi-occupied Europe by late 1944, according to a comparison by VF of company letterhead from the years before and during the war listing all the offices. The company says it delivered supplies to the German army. Another driver of growth for Kuehne + Nagel was an agreement with Nazi authorities to ship looted Jewish-owned property from Western Europe to Germany as part of the furniture operation, which took place from spring 1942 through July 1944.

As Allied bombing raids on Germany destroyed homes and offices, the demand for household items and furniture soared. In January 1942 Hitler decided that all movable property owned by Jews slated for deportation in Western Europe was to be brought to Germany and distributed.

A ledger from a Rotterdam freighter, discovered by VF in the archive of the Netherlands Institute for War, Holocaust, and Genocide Studies in Amsterdam, provides a glimpse of the enormous size of the operation. The ledger lists 360 ships commissioned by Kuehne + Nagel’s Amsterdam office between June 1942 and August 1943 on behalf of the Nazi authorities, which transported furniture across Germany stolen from Jews, according to a handwritten note accompanying the ledger. One bill of lading, for example, recorded 307 boxes of cutlery and china, 105 beds, 93 bedsteads, 91 stoves, 62 bedside tables, 32 clocks, 17 ironing boards, 11 umbrella stands, 10 deck chairs, and 2 baby carriages being shipped from Amsterdam to Bremen in December 1942.

“The management at Kuehne & Nagel was well informed about the ongoing dispossession of the Jews. It is possible that the managers did not know that the owners of the property they were transporting were to be murdered. But they nevertheless facilitated the economic destruction of European Jewry,” writes historian Johannes Beermann-Schön of Frankfurt’s Goethe University.

Adolf Maass, who was Jewish and forced out of Kuehne + Nagel, with his wife, Käthe, in 1933. The two were killed at Auschwitz in 1944. The company was awarded for conforming to Nazi ideology in the workplace

Kuehne + Nagel also transported looted art. It didn’t always arrive at its destination. The Office of Strategic Services, the CIA’s predecessor, discovered months after the war ended that Kuehne + Nagel had lost a 1944 shipment of 14 paintings en route from Paris to Germany. Gustav Rochlitz, a German art dealer in Paris who acquired looted art during the war, had bought the paintings from the Nazi task force in charge of the furniture operation. The missing shipment contained, among other works, seven paintings by Matisse and one each by Picasso, Modigliani, Gauguin, Cézanne, Manet, and Pissarro, according to an OSS document from August 1945 found by VF in the National Archives in Washington. Public auction records suggest that if all of these works were genuine, they would be worth tens if not hundreds of millions in today’s art market.

The Third Reich and the transport of looted property during World War II made the Kuehne brothers very rich. After ousting Maass in 1933, Alfred and Werner began earning on average around 175,000 reichsmarks annually, according to their denazification files—about $3.4 million today. By 1942, when the furniture operation began, the brothers had hit their peak earnings: the equivalent of about $4.6 million each.

Even though the Kuehne brothers were considered “high-ranking Nazi industrialists” by American investigators and “big time Nazis” by the British authorities after the war, both ended up being judged as mere “fellow travelers”—Nazi followers who weren’t involved in the regime’s crimes—in denazification proceedings in 1948. No repercussions followed. Their denazification files in the Bremen state archive contain no mention of the furniture operation.

After the war, Kuehne + Nagel fronted a CIA-backed precursor of West Germany’s foreign intelligence agency, the German newspaper Welt reported in 2015. The German spy agency used some of the transport firm’s offices as cover for key operatives. Alfred Kuehne’s denazification file includes a letter, marked “top secret” and dated February 17, 1948, from British intelligence to the American denazification committee in Bremen. “It is considered vital for operations which are already in hand that Mr. Alfred Kuehne be denazified in such a category so that he is able to retain his business,” wrote a chief of British intelligence, who provided his rank, major-general, in the letter, but not his name. “We would be very grateful to you if you could aid us in this matter since it concerns the security of the British and American zones.”

Soon after the letter was sent, the Kuehnes’ businesses and other assets, which had been frozen as part of their denazification proceedings, were returned to them and they were reinstated in their executive positions at Kuehne + Nagel.

Alfred became the company’s major shareholder in 1952 after Werner, a lifelong bachelor, moved to South Africa, where he died in the mid-1950s. Klaus-Michael, Alfred’s only child and anointed successor, began working at the firm in 1958, when he was 21, and took the helm eight years later.

IV. KUEHNE’S BRAZEN REQUEST

Klaus-Michael has built Kuehne + Nagel into a global logistics behemoth in the six decades since, relocating the company seat and headquarters to Switzerland, selling a stake to shore up liquidity and save the firm before buying back the shares to retake control. In 2023 the firm had about $30 billion in revenue, more than 80,000 employees, and 1,300 offices across about 100 countries. “I have worked far too much in my life,” the billionaire told Swiss magazine Bilanz. He has also spoken about neglecting his private life, including not having any children with Christine. That they have remained childless is “sad of course,” Kuehne told SonntagsZeitung. “The third generation is the last in the family. As a family entrepreneur, I think it’s a shame that I can’t pass on the business personally.”

Perhaps because of that, the octogenarian is busy focusing on his legacy—in particular how he will be remembered in Hamburg, the country’s largest port and main gateway to the world.

Through 2023, Kuehne was the main sponsor of Hamburg’s Harbour Front Literature Festival. The main literature prize, endowed with 10,000 euros, even bore his name, the Klaus-Michael Kuehne Prize. That was until 2022, when two nominees for the prize withdrew because of Kuehne’s refusal to deal with his firm and family’s Nazi past, and the prize was renamed. Kuehne’s foundation felt it was “treated extremely unfairly in the matter,” a spokesperson told the German newspaper Taz at the time. It soon stopped sponsoring the festival. It didn’t take place this year because the festival wasn’t able to find a major sponsor to replace the foundation.

Author Sven Pfizenmaier was the first of the two nominees to withdraw from the prize. “I’m no fan of billionaires in general and billionaires who profited from Nazism, deny it, and whitewash themselves by funding art seems very bad, so that’s why I did it,” Pfizenmaier says by phone from Berlin.

“We believe that being open, honest, and transparent in everything we do will build trust with our stakeholders,” reads the opening sentence on Kuehne + Nagel’s investor relations page. When it comes to the company’s dark history, Kuehne is anything but open and transparent. In April 2015 a regional TV channel in Germany broadcast a short documentary about Kuehne + Nagel’s role in the furniture operation. Shortly before the film aired, Kuehne wrote to the channel director, asking that the outlet reconsider broadcasting the 22-minute documentary, because “old wounds are being reopened.”

Kuehne’s brazen request, which was declined, came only months after he had shelved the Handelsblatt Research Institute study sources say he had commissioned for Kuehne + Nagel’s 125th anniversary.

In the run-up to the broadcast, the transportation firm published a defensive statement on its website. “Like other companies that already existed before 1945, Kuehne + Nagel was involved in the war economy and had to maintain its existence in dark and difficult times,” wrote the company in the German-only statement. “Kuehne + Nagel is aware of the shameful events during the Third Reich and deeply regrets that it carried out some of its activities on behalf of the Nazi regime. The conditions under the dictatorship at the time and the fact that Kuehne + Nagel survived the turmoil of war with all its strength and secured the company’s existence must be taken into account.” It remains the sole acknowledgment to date by the firm about its Nazi activities. Other than the statement, Kuehne + Nagel’s website doesn’t mention the past, as it doesn’t have a history section.

While the firm has stayed silent on its past since 2015, Kuehne has since responded to the criticism that he and his company have not sufficiently addressed the company’s past involvement in Nazi crimes. “I would have understood if people had questioned these things 10 or 20 years after the war. Everything was still fresh in people’s minds then. The people who were responsible at the time were still alive. But to come back to it 70 years later. I find that strange,” Kuehne said in the SonntagsZeitung interview from January 2022. “At some point, one has to let the dust settle on things. That’s my basic attitude. It’s important to learn lessons from what happened back then.”

V. THE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD

On a sweltering Sunday morning in early September 2023, about 300 people gathered on the waterfront in Bremen’s historical city center. The crowd was there for the inauguration of a monument commemorating the systematic looting of European Jews by Nazi Germany through the practice of Aryanization. The memorial’s chosen location was no accident. High above the waterfront, overlooking the monument, towered the German headquarters of Kuehne + Nagel.

Barbara Maass, granddaughter of Adolf, memorializes her family story to a crowd gathered in Bremen, Germany, in 2023.

Down below, Barbara Maass sat near the front row. The granddaughter of Adolf and Käthe Maass had come from Montreal for the memorial’s inauguration. After Adolf Maass was ousted from Kuehne + Nagel in 1933, the couple sent their three children abroad: their eldest son to England, their daughter to the US, Barbara’s father to Canada. Adolf and Käthe weren’t able to escape Nazi Germany in time. They were murdered in Auschwitz in May 1944. Leo Lewitus, who also lost his firm to the Kuehne brothers, did survive the Holocaust and immigrated to Israel.

Barbara Maass disagrees with Klaus-Michael Kuehne’s notion that it’s time to move on. “I believe perhaps naively that we can learn from the past, but to do so means knowing what actually happened in the past,” Maass said in an interview at her home in Montreal. “Crimes against humanity are always relevant. There are moral decisions to be made today, much as there were in the past. I’m profoundly convinced that the truth needs to be told.”

Henning Bleyl, who leads the Böll Foundation, spent eight years persuading the city of Bremen to get the Aryanization monument built. It’s important that Kuehne reckons with his firm and family’s Nazi past before he dies, according to Bleyl. “At this fraught time in Germany, Kuehne, as the country’s richest individual, would set a strong example by coming clean about the past,” said Bleyl in Bremen. “Through his charity, he has built a public position. He can use that for the good and gain inner peace by freeing himself from a sense of obligation to his firm and family.”

Thomas Sorg worked at Kuehne + Nagel Germany for 45 years and spent years battling with the billionaire as chairman of the firm’s workers council. Sorg doesn’t believe Kuehne will reckon with his firm’s Nazi past before he dies. “If Klaus-Michael Kuehne doesn’t want to do something, then he doesn’t do it. Period,” said Sorg at a reception in Bremen after the ceremony. “Kuehne will do everything he can to protect the memory of his father, whom he revered beyond all measure.”

When Kuehne dies, he’ll leave his holding company, which controls his $44 billion fortune, including the majority of Kuehne + Nagel shares, to his family foundation. The Kuehne foundation will become one of the world’s largest private charities by endowment size, focusing on logistics, medicine, climate, and culture.

When he dies, Kuehne knows where he’ll be buried, he told a German magazine. He has reserved a place at Hamburg’s Ohlsdorf cemetery, next to his father.

VanityFair : The Richest Man in Germany Is Worth $44 Billion. The Source of His

The Richest Man in Germany Is Worth $44 Billion. The Source of His Family Fortune? The Nazis Know.

Klaus-Michael Kuehne, born in 1937, has more money than Ken Griffin, MacKenzie Scott, or François Pinault. Just don’t ask him how he got so rich.

Klaus-Michael Kuehne, honorary chairman of Kuehne + Nagel, boasts a net worth of about $44 billion. His father, Alfred Kuehne (inset), ran the logistics company before him, making his fortune in part by transporting looted Jewish property during World War

I. A DIRTY BUSINESS

On a Thursday afternoon in mid-November 2023, an elderly man was walking through Hamburg’s Ohlsdorf Cemetery, the world’s fourth-largest graveyard, to visit the burial place of his favorite soccer player when he noticed something very wrong. Someone had sprayed “Nazi Kapital” (“Nazi fortune”) on the Kuehne family’s tombstone, in red and black, while the cryptic term “M-Aktion” was tagged on Alfred Kuehne’s tombstone.

These weren’t just any family tombs: The Kuehne dynasty is industrial royalty in Germany. Klaus-Michael Kuehne, the only child of Alfred and Mercedes Kuehne, is the country’s wealthiest person, with a fortune estimated at $44 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The 87-year-old billionaire owes his fortune to Kuehne + Nagel, the world’s largest freight forwarder, founded by Kuehne’s grandfather and Friedrich Nagel in 1890. Kuehne has used his wealth to build up a global transportation empire. He is also the largest shareholder of the German airline Lufthansa, shipping behemoth Hapag-Lloyd, chemicals distributor Brenntag, Hamburg soccer club HSV, and the company that owns North America’s Greyhound bus lines. In 2023 alone, according to Bloomberg, he stood to pocket $4.5 billion in dividends from his empire.

In the context of Germany’s discreet but clubby old money, where aristocratic and industrialist heirs mingle at hunting parties or go skiing in the Alps, Kuehne is a loner. Despite his billions, he remains outside Germany’s power circles and is only spotted occasionally at financier and merchant hangouts such as Hamburg’s Übersee-Club, a century-old private members establishment founded by the city’s Warburg banking dynasty. Kuehne, who once described himself as “exhausting, impatient, and unpleasant” to work with, prefers to keep to himself, either at his estate and office near Lake Zurich, at his chalet in the Swiss Alps, on his yacht, or at his villa on Mallorca, to which he flies commercial. Despite having been based in Switzerland for almost 50 years, Kuehne has said his roots remain in his hometown, Hamburg, where he was born and raised.

Nazi graffiti on the Kuehne family gravestone at Ohlsdorf cemetery in 2023.PICTURE ALLIANCE/GETTY

Kuehne is so devoted to Hamburg that he has become its largest private investor and philanthropist in recent years, even though he spends most of his time outside the city of 1.8 million residents, Germany’s second largest. The billionaire has invested more than 100 million euros in HSV and another 100 million euros in the development of The Fontenay, a luxury hotel in Hamburg. (He also owns the five-star hotel Castell Son Claret on Mallorca.) He has donated more than 70 million euros to the Kuehne Logistics University, a private business school in Hamburg, and gave millions to help build Hamburg’s philharmonic, which resides in a Herzog & de Meuron–designed concert hall. Kuehne is negotiating with Hamburg’s senate to finance the building of a new opera house and told the city’s largest newspaper in 2023 that his charitable foundation is willing to contribute up to 300 million euros for the construction.

Kuehne’s public appearance has remained virtually the same over the years. A hulking figure in a suit, he has ice-gray hair that looks like it’s been parted with a ruler; his eyes look straight ahead; his facial features are strong, including his prominent overbite. He met his wife, Christine, a cheerful woman with short blond hair, late in life, on a holiday in the Swiss mountains. They married in December 1989 when he was 52 and she was 51. Kuehne writes poems by hand to her for their wedding anniversary and her birthday, he told the German newspaper Die Zeit. She sometimes spontaneously serenades him with arias by Puccini. Neither of them like men with beards, according to the tabloid Bild. Which is why a captain of their Benetti-built 130-foot yacht, Chrimi III (which stands for Christine and Michael), had to shave before being hired.

The only person he reveres more than his wife is his late father, Alfred, whom he succeeded as Kuehne + Nagel CEO when he was 29. In 1975 Klaus-Michael and his father moved Kuehne + Nagel’s corporate seat and headquarters from Germany to Schindellegi, a Swiss hillside hamlet near Zurich, for tax reasons. The only decoration on the wall of the Kuehne + Nagel boardroom is a portrait of Alfred. “I learned the most from him,” Kuehne has said about his father. “Companies have to be managed individually—like a family business.”

The thing about Alfred is that he built part of the family business profiting from the Nazi regime’s persecution and genocide of European Jews. After Adolf Hitler seized power in Germany, Alfred and his brother Werner, Klaus-Michael’s uncle, ousted their Jewish shareholder from Kuehne + Nagel. During World War II, Kuehne + Nagel, led by Alfred and Werner, transported looted Jewish property, primarily furniture, books, and art, from occupied Western Europe to Nazi Germany as part of the so-called “M-Aktion,” an abbreviation of “Möbelaktion,” which translates to “furniture operation.” Over two years, between 1942 and 1944, almost 70,000 homes belonging to Jews in the Netherlands, France, Belgium, and Luxembourg were systematically looted after their inhabitants had been deported by train to ghettos and death camps. The task force overseeing the operation was part of a Nazi organization dedicated to appropriating property during the war, named after Alfred Rosenberg, the Nazi Party’s chief ideologue. After the war, the Kuehne brothers may have escaped punishment for their activities during the Third Reich because of their ties to American, British, and German intelligence agencies.

Kuehne + Nagel had a quasi-monopoly on the furniture operation, according to Frank Bajohr, head of the Center for Holocaust Studies at the Institute of Contemporary History in Munich. “Even in the most remote places, the company doing the furniture transports was always Kuehne + Nagel,” says Bajohr. “Kuehne + Nagel is in the same category of firms like the ones that sold Zyklon B for use in the gas chambers or that built the crematoria in the extermination camps. Transporting the stolen goods of people after they were deported,” he adds, “is a kind of dirty business far beyond anything I can comprehend.” Yet the role of Klaus-Michael Kuehne’s firm and family in the Third Reich is little known to the outside world.

Big German firms such as Deutsche Bank, Volkswagen, and Bertelsmann opened their archives years ago to allow historians to examine their own lucrative Nazi collaborations. The commissioned studies unearthed that Deutsche Bank aided the expropriation of hundreds of Jewish-owned businesses and helped finance the construction of Auschwitz; that tens of thousands of men and women were used as forced and slave laborers to mass-produce weapons at the Volkswagen factory; and that Bertelsmann published antisemitic literature and exploited Jewish slave labor. In 2000 the three firms joined more than 6,500 German companies, including Kuehne + Nagel, in agreeing to pay about $2.5 billion to a reparations fund that provided financial compensation to surviving forced and slave laborers. But Kuehne + Nagel has never opened its archives.

In 2022 Kuehne told the Swiss newspaper SonntagsZeitung that no company documents from the Nazi era were available, claiming that the company archives in Hamburg and Bremen were destroyed by Allied bombings in World War II. An index of German company archives from the 1990s shows that at least 10 meters (30 feet) of archival files should be present at Kuehne + Nagel. This most likely includes material from before and during World War II, as the collection begins in 1902, according to Kuehne + Nagel’s index page. “Use only possible with management approval,” it says on the page.

Kuehne also said in the SonntagsZeitung interview that he finds commissioning independent historians to investigate his company history akin to blackmail. “We were approached by some who would have liked to do this and they asked for several hundred thousand euros. They said we were obliged to do it. I found that almost a bit extortionate,” Kuehne told the Swiss newspaper. “So I said, ‘We won’t do that. We have nothing to hide, we acknowledge our guilt.’ ”

What Kuehne has not explained is why he won’t release the study that sources say he commissioned.

In early 2014 Kuehne commissioned Handelsblatt Research Institute, the independent research arm of German newspaper Handelsblatt, to conduct a study of his family firm’s entire history for Kuehne + Nagel’s 125th anniversary in July 2015. Researchers were even given access to the company archive in Hamburg and a guarantee of academic freedom and independence, according to people familiar with the matter. But when the final result was sent to Kuehne in early 2015, including a chapter on the activities of his father, uncle, and firm during the Third Reich, he refused to have the study published. Kuehne rejected the study by saying “my father wasn’t a Nazi” during a phone conference, according to people familiar with the conversation. When the researchers refused to change the chapter, according to these sources, Kuehne said the study wouldn’t be published and ended the call. The 180-page study, contractually owned by Kuehne + Nagel, remains unpublished and inaccessible. Jan Kleibrink, the managing director of Handelsblatt Research Institute, would neither confirm nor deny Kuehne’s commissioning and shelving of the study.

Kuehne declined to be interviewed for this article. Dominique Nadelhofer, the spokesperson for the billionaire, his holding company, his foundation, and Kuehne + Nagel, declined to answer detailed questions sent by VF. “Mr. Kuehne was seven years old at the end of World War II and therefore had nothing to do with the war,” Nadelhofer wrote in an emailed statement. “He is now 87 years old and, again, these historical events are beyond his control.”

II. THE POLITICS OF MEMORY

For decades Germany’s political leaders have accepted moral responsibility and acknowledged the sins of the Nazi past, centering remembrance as a component of German society. But recently the country has seemed to regress. As the last witnesses to the Nazi era die and the cultural memory of the Third Reich fades, the right wing, increasingly mainstream, has attacked Germany’s progressive ideals. For much of 2023, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) polled as the largest party, hitting an all-time high of 23 percent in the polls in December. In June 2024 the AfD won a record number of votes in the European parliament elections. The party captured 16 percent of the German vote and came in second in the elections as concerns about immigration and the economy fanned voter discontent.

“Hitler and the Nazis are just a speck of bird shit in over a thousand years of successful German history,” the AfD’s then coleader Alexander Gauland said in a 2018 speech. The AfD’s extremist wing is associated with antisemitism, Islamophobia, and historical revisionism, including the downplaying of Nazi crimes and denigration of the Holocaust. In May and July 2024, Björn Höcke, a leading AfD politician and founder of its extremist wing, was fined twice by a German court for using the banned Nazi slogan “Everything for Germany!” in his campaign speeches. Höcke has lamented the construction of a Holocaust memorial in central Berlin. Calling Germans “the only people in the world who planted a memorial of shame in the heart of their capital,” he has demanded a “180-degree turn” in the country’s “politics of memory.”

Kuehne’s politics could be described as free-market conservative. “I believe that support for the AfD will dwindle again,” he told German newspaper Welt in 2017. “Right-wing movements have no foothold in Germany.” Since 2021 he has donated about 200,000 euros ($220,000) to the Christian conservative CDU, the establishment party for German business and of former chancellor Angela Merkel. Kuehne even once said he could envision himself voting for the left-wing Green Party.

But Kuehne’s refusal to more publicly reckon with his family and firm’s Nazi past plays into the hands of the revisionist movement, says Henning Bleyl, director of the Heinrich Böll Foundation in Bremen, a think tank affiliated with the German Green Party. He has been investigating Kuehne + Nagel’s wartime activities since 2015. These revisionist narratives of Germany’s past are prominently embodied by the AfD, but the far right in Germany, Austria, France, and many other European countries use historical revisionism to manipulate the narrative around the Nazi era and World War II to advance their political agenda.

“Even in past decades, it was unacceptable that Kuehne refused to deal honestly with his family’s actions during the Nazi era,” said Bleyl in an interview on the roof terrace above his office in Bremen. “Now it is even more of an issue because, as I view it, Kuehne’s stance places him in the ranks of those who want to ‘exonerate’ German history from its Nazi past.”

III. “A SO-CALLED ARYANIZATION”

Interviews and newly unearthed archival material by VF in Amsterdam, Bremen, Hamburg, Munich, Montreal, and Washington, DC, detail the extent of Nazi profiteering by the Kuehne brothers and firm. Alfred and Werner Kuehne began profiting from the persecution of Jews much earlier than is known: years before World War II and mere months after Hitler seized power in Germany on January 30, 1933.

In late April of that year, the Kuehne brothers ousted their Jewish partner and co-owner Adolf Maass after he’d spent more than 30 years at the firm. Maass, 57 at the time, owned 45 percent of the Hamburg branch of Kuehne + Nagel, which he had founded in 1902 and which was the largest and most profitable part of the firm. When Friedrich Nagel died heirless in 1907, his shares went to his cofounder, August Kuehne, the father of Alfred and Werner. He died in 1932.

According to a signed and dated contract in the Maass family archive in the Montreal Holocaust museum, Maass signed over his shares and claims to the Kuehne brothers on April 22, 1933, for no compensation. The reason? An alleged inability “to fulfill his capital obligations” to the Kuehnes and the company. Such accusations became a common method in Nazi Germany to oust Jewish shareholders from their own firms. “This wasn’t a free and regular business contract,” says Frank Bajohr. “The Kuehnes used the political situation for their own benefit. It’s no accident that this contract was formulated in spring 1933. Maass wouldn’t have signed this contract in the years before Hitler took power. This was a so-called Aryanization.”

“The constitutional element of an Aryanization contract was that Jewish ownership was completely eliminated and that the company was handed over in its entirety to non-Jewish owners,” says Bajohr. “In this case, the Kuehnes.”

Nine days after ousting Maass, the Kuehne brothers became Nazi Party members, according to their denazification files in the Bremen state archive. In the following years the Kuehnes developed their firm into a “national-socialist model company,” an honorary title that the Nazi regime awarded to Kuehne + Nagel in 1937, the year that Klaus-Michael was born. The Kuehne brothers would declare in their denazification proceedings that Maass’s “Jewish origin caused serious trouble” for the firm and themselves. The siblings claimed that Maass left voluntarily and that they “derived no personal economic advantage from dissolving the partnership.”


In 1938 Kuehne + Nagel acquired the Hamburg subsidiary of the Czech transport company Alfred Deutsch. The owner was Leo Lewitus, a Jewish entrepreneur forced to sell his firm by the Nazi authorities in tandem with the Kuehne brothers. In 180 pages of correspondence during the acquisition discovered by VF in the Hamburg state archive, Kuehne + Nagel managers wrote matter-of-factly that the takeover was an Aryanization.

The start of World War II offered the Kuehne brothers the first opportunity for foreign expansion. In the footsteps of the Wehrmacht’s military conquest of Europe, Kuehne + Nagel grew rapidly: The transportation firm went from seven branches in Germany in early 1939 to 26 branches across Nazi-occupied Europe by late 1944, according to a comparison by VF of company letterhead from the years before and during the war listing all the offices. The company says it delivered supplies to the German army. Another driver of growth for Kuehne + Nagel was an agreement with Nazi authorities to ship looted Jewish-owned property from Western Europe to Germany as part of the furniture operation, which took place from spring 1942 through July 1944.

As Allied bombing raids on Germany destroyed homes and offices, the demand for household items and furniture soared. In January 1942 Hitler decided that all movable property owned by Jews slated for deportation in Western Europe was to be brought to Germany and distributed.

A ledger from a Rotterdam freighter, discovered by VF in the archive of the Netherlands Institute for War, Holocaust, and Genocide Studies in Amsterdam, provides a glimpse of the enormous size of the operation. The ledger lists 360 ships commissioned by Kuehne + Nagel’s Amsterdam office between June 1942 and August 1943 on behalf of the Nazi authorities, which transported furniture across Germany stolen from Jews, according to a handwritten note accompanying the ledger. One bill of lading, for example, recorded 307 boxes of cutlery and china, 105 beds, 93 bedsteads, 91 stoves, 62 bedside tables, 32 clocks, 17 ironing boards, 11 umbrella stands, 10 deck chairs, and 2 baby carriages being shipped from Amsterdam to Bremen in December 1942.

“The management at Kuehne & Nagel was well informed about the ongoing dispossession of the Jews. It is possible that the managers did not know that the owners of the property they were transporting were to be murdered. But they nevertheless facilitated the economic destruction of European Jewry,” writes historian Johannes Beermann-Schön of Frankfurt’s Goethe University.

Kuehne + Nagel also transported looted art. It didn’t always arrive at its destination. The Office of Strategic Services, the CIA’s predecessor, discovered months after the war ended that Kuehne + Nagel had lost a 1944 shipment of 14 paintings en route from Paris to Germany. Gustav Rochlitz, a German art dealer in Paris who acquired looted art during the war, had bought the paintings from the Nazi task force in charge of the furniture operation. The missing shipment contained, among other works, seven paintings by Matisse and one each by Picasso, Modigliani, Gauguin, Cézanne, Manet, and Pissarro, according to an OSS document from August 1945 found by VF in the National Archives in Washington. Public auction records suggest that if all of these works were genuine, they would be worth tens if not hundreds of millions in today’s art market.

The Third Reich and the transport of looted property during World War II made the Kuehne brothers very rich. After ousting Maass in 1933, Alfred and Werner began earning on average around 175,000 reichsmarks annually, according to their denazification files—about $3.4 million today. By 1942, when the furniture operation began, the brothers had hit their peak earnings: the equivalent of about $4.6 million each.

Even though the Kuehne brothers were considered “high-ranking Nazi industrialists” by American investigators and “big time Nazis” by the British authorities after the war, both ended up being judged as mere “fellow travelers”—Nazi followers who weren’t involved in the regime’s crimes—in denazification proceedings in 1948. No repercussions followed. Their denazification files in the Bremen state archive contain no mention of the furniture operation.

After the war, Kuehne + Nagel fronted a CIA-backed precursor of West Germany’s foreign intelligence agency, the German newspaper Welt reported in 2015. The German spy agency used some of the transport firm’s offices as cover for key operatives. Alfred Kuehne’s denazification file includes a letter, marked “top secret” and dated February 17, 1948, from British intelligence to the American denazification committee in Bremen. “It is considered vital for operations which are already in hand that Mr. Alfred Kuehne be denazified in such a category so that he is able to retain his business,” wrote a chief of British intelligence, who provided his rank, major-general, in the letter, but not his name. “We would be very grateful to you if you could aid us in this matter since it concerns the security of the British and American zones.”

Soon after the letter was sent, the Kuehnes’ businesses and other assets, which had been frozen as part of their denazification proceedings, were returned to them and they were reinstated in their executive positions at Kuehne + Nagel.

Alfred became the company’s major shareholder in 1952 after Werner, a lifelong bachelor, moved to South Africa, where he died in the mid-1950s. Klaus-Michael, Alfred’s only child and anointed successor, began working at the firm in 1958, when he was 21, and took the helm eight years later.

IV. KUEHNE’S BRAZEN REQUEST

Klaus-Michael has built Kuehne + Nagel into a global logistics behemoth in the six decades since, relocating the company seat and headquarters to Switzerland, selling a stake to shore up liquidity and save the firm before buying back the shares to retake control. In 2023 the firm had about $30 billion in revenue, more than 80,000 employees, and 1,300 offices across about 100 countries. “I have worked far too much in my life,” the billionaire told Swiss magazine Bilanz. He has also spoken about neglecting his private life, including not having any children with Christine. That they have remained childless is “sad of course,” Kuehne told SonntagsZeitung. “The third generation is the last in the family. As a family entrepreneur, I think it’s a shame that I can’t pass on the business personally.”

Perhaps because of that, the octogenarian is busy focusing on his legacy—in particular how he will be remembered in Hamburg, the country’s largest port and main gateway to the world.

Through 2023, Kuehne was the main sponsor of Hamburg’s Harbour Front Literature Festival. The main literature prize, endowed with 10,000 euros, even bore his name, the Klaus-Michael Kuehne Prize. That was until 2022, when two nominees for the prize withdrew because of Kuehne’s refusal to deal with his firm and family’s Nazi past, and the prize was renamed. Kuehne’s foundation felt it was “treated extremely unfairly in the matter,” a spokesperson told the German newspaper Taz at the time. It soon stopped sponsoring the festival. It didn’t take place this year because the festival wasn’t able to find a major sponsor to replace the foundation.

Author Sven Pfizenmaier was the first of the two nominees to withdraw from the prize. “I’m no fan of billionaires in general and billionaires who profited from Nazism, deny it, and whitewash themselves by funding art seems very bad, so that’s why I did it,” Pfizenmaier says by phone from Berlin.

“We believe that being open, honest, and transparent in everything we do will build trust with our stakeholders,” reads the opening sentence on Kuehne + Nagel’s investor relations page. When it comes to the company’s dark history, Kuehne is anything but open and transparent. In April 2015 a regional TV channel in Germany broadcast a short documentary about Kuehne + Nagel’s role in the furniture operation. Shortly before the film aired, Kuehne wrote to the channel director, asking that the outlet reconsider broadcasting the 22-minute documentary, because “old wounds are being reopened.”

Kuehne’s brazen request, which was declined, came only months after he had shelved the Handelsblatt Research Institute study sources say he had commissioned for Kuehne + Nagel’s 125th anniversary.

In the run-up to the broadcast, the transportation firm published a defensive statement on its website. “Like other companies that already existed before 1945, Kuehne + Nagel was involved in the war economy and had to maintain its existence in dark and difficult times,” wrote the company in the German-only statement. “Kuehne + Nagel is aware of the shameful events during the Third Reich and deeply regrets that it carried out some of its activities on behalf of the Nazi regime. The conditions under the dictatorship at the time and the fact that Kuehne + Nagel survived the turmoil of war with all its strength and secured the company’s existence must be taken into account.” It remains the sole acknowledgment to date by the firm about its Nazi activities. Other than the statement, Kuehne + Nagel’s website doesn’t mention the past, as it doesn’t have a history section.

While the firm has stayed silent on its past since 2015, Kuehne has since responded to the criticism that he and his company have not sufficiently addressed the company’s past involvement in Nazi crimes. “I would have understood if people had questioned these things 10 or 20 years after the war. Everything was still fresh in people’s minds then. The people who were responsible at the time were still alive. But to come back to it 70 years later. I find that strange,” Kuehne said in the SonntagsZeitung interview from January 2022. “At some point, one has to let the dust settle on things. That’s my basic attitude. It’s important to learn lessons from what happened back then.”

V. THE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD

On a sweltering Sunday morning in early September 2023, about 300 people gathered on the waterfront in Bremen’s historical city center. The crowd was there for the inauguration of a monument commemorating the systematic looting of European Jews by Nazi Germany through the practice of Aryanization. The memorial’s chosen location was no accident. High above the waterfront, overlooking the monument, towered the German headquarters of Kuehne + Nagel.

Down below, Barbara Maass sat near the front row. The granddaughter of Adolf and Käthe Maass had come from Montreal for the memorial’s inauguration. After Adolf Maass was ousted from Kuehne + Nagel in 1933, the couple sent their three children abroad: their eldest son to England, their daughter to the US, Barbara’s father to Canada. Adolf and Käthe weren’t able to escape Nazi Germany in time. They were murdered in Auschwitz in May 1944. Leo Lewitus, who also lost his firm to the Kuehne brothers, did survive the Holocaust and immigrated to Israel.

Barbara Maass disagrees with Klaus-Michael Kuehne’s notion that it’s time to move on. “I believe perhaps naively that we can learn from the past, but to do so means knowing what actually happened in the past,” Maass said in an interview at her home in Montreal. “Crimes against humanity are always relevant. There are moral decisions to be made today, much as there were in the past. I’m profoundly convinced that the truth needs to be told.”

Henning Bleyl, who leads the Böll Foundation, spent eight years persuading the city of Bremen to get the Aryanization monument built. It’s important that Kuehne reckons with his firm and family’s Nazi past before he dies, according to Bleyl. “At this fraught time in Germany, Kuehne, as the country’s richest individual, would set a strong example by coming clean about the past,” said Bleyl in Bremen. “Through his charity, he has built a public position. He can use that for the good and gain inner peace by freeing himself from a sense of obligation to his firm and family.”

Thomas Sorg worked at Kuehne + Nagel Germany for 45 years and spent years battling with the billionaire as chairman of the firm’s workers council. Sorg doesn’t believe Kuehne will reckon with his firm’s Nazi past before he dies. “If Klaus-Michael Kuehne doesn’t want to do something, then he doesn’t do it. Period,” said Sorg at a reception in Bremen after the ceremony. “Kuehne will do everything he can to protect the memory of his father, whom he revered beyond all measure.”

When Kuehne dies, he’ll leave his holding company, which controls his $44 billion fortune, including the majority of Kuehne + Nagel shares, to his family foundation. The Kuehne foundation will become one of the world’s largest private charities by endowment size, focusing on logistics, medicine, climate, and culture.

When he dies, Kuehne knows where he’ll be buried, he told a German magazine. He has reserved a place at Hamburg’s Ohlsdorf cemetery, next to his father.

FT : Roche data shows stomach-churning side effects of weight-loss drugs

Roche data shows stomach-churning side effects of weight-loss drugs
High rates of vomiting among those who took strong doses in trials have unsettled investors

Roche raised hopes this year that it had a future blockbuster drug on its hands after early trial results of the Swiss pharmaceutical group’s new obesity treatments showed rapid weight loss among recipients.

But revelations earlier this week of high rates of vomiting and other side effects among those who took strong doses of the drugs have unsettled investors and highlighted the challenges facing businesses that want to enter the lucrative new market for “GLP-1” drugs.

The company’s shares dropped 4 per cent on Monday after it revealed that three-quarters of patients on the highest dose of its CT-388 injection had suffered from vomiting. They fell another 5 per cent on Thursday after similar data for its oral weight-loss pill.

The reaction is a reminder that not all patients can tolerate the new class of weight-loss treatments dominated by Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly — and that challengers to the industry’s pioneers face significant hurdles.

The treatments were one of the main talking points at the conference of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes in Madrid this week.

Peter Verdult, a Citigroup analyst attending the conference, said Roche had caused problems for itself by touting its initial trial results in July as “really special data”.

“I don’t think anyone can say that now,” he said. “They set themselves up for a fall.”

Global drugmakers are racing to catch up with Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly’s lead in the lucrative and rapidly growing GLP-1 drug market.

Of the 1,150 research abstracts presented at the Madrid conference, almost one-10th featured GLP-1 drugs.

The medication has proved an effective way both to control weight and treat diabetes, and Goldman Sachs analysts have estimated the market for the products could grow to $130bn annually by 2030.


The novel drugs work by mimicking the gut hormone GLP-1, which lowers blood sugar and limits the appetite. Treatments such as Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro also add another gut hormone, GIP, that appears to enhance weight loss. In addition, companies are experimenting with other gut and pancreatic hormones.

Francine Kaufman, a former head of the American Diabetes Association and now chief medical officer of medical devices company Senseonics, said the drugs had revolutionised diabetes care at a moment when obesity rates were rising.

“I said in the 2000s that we needed a silver bullet,” she said. “It arrived.”

GLP-1-based drugs are, nevertheless, associated with vomiting, nausea and constipation, particularly in higher doses. They are also linked with muscle wastage in some trials. The US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have explored other more serious side-effects reported with recent drugs — such as suicidal thoughts — but found no evidence of a link.

Defending the potential of Roche’s drugs, Manu Chakravarthy, who leads the company’s metabolic product development, said it had wanted to “push the tolerability” of its drug and that side-effects at high doses were consistent with other GLP-1-based drugs.

Users of Roche’s products in future trials were unlikely to receive such high doses or rapid increases, Chakravarthy added.

“We’re encouraged as it cannot get any worse than this,” he said.

Drugmakers use early trials to test the safety of their drugs and often test high doses. Verdult said there were also concerns about side-effects years ago when Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly presented data on their drugs.

At the Madrid conference, Novo Nordisk presented data on a new drug — oral amycretin — showing it prompted vomiting in more than half of users on the highest dose.

The side-effects appear to deter some patients. Research published this year by Blue Health Intelligence found that 30 per cent of GLP-1 users stopped treatment within four weeks of starting, with side effects a significant factor. Cost and availability of the drugs are also a factor.

Former UK prime minister Boris Johnson wrote in a Daily Mail newspaper column last year that he was unable to tolerate vomiting linked to taking diabetes treatment Ozempic off-label.

Other drugmakers have had setbacks in developing so-called small molecule pills — synthetic drugs that are easier to manufacture at scale than weight-loss injections.

Pfizer abandoned a twice-daily version of its weight-loss drug danuglipron after recording a high degree of nausea and vomiting in mid-stage trials. But the New York-based drugmaker is pushing ahead with a daily, tweaked version.


To tackle side effects, companies are developing alternative formulations of drugs. Analysts noted excitement about amylin, a pancreatic hormone that is thought to reduce muscle wastage linked to drugs, although this has yet to be proved at scale.

Novo Nordisk’s next product — CagriSema — combines GLP-1s with an amylin analogue. The drugmaker will report late-stage data later this year from the product.

Eli Lilly has struck several deals aimed at resolving the issue of muscle wastage. Last year it spent up to $1.9bn acquiring Versanis, whose lead drug is based on the hormone activin that helps to regulate muscle mass. It is also partnering with BioAge, a company developing a muscle regeneration drug. BioAge recently filed for an initial public offering.

Yet the emerging data continues to underline how much companies, investors and scientists still have to discover about how GLP-1 treatments work.

Among the studies presented in Madrid was one that showed Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro drug led to more effective weight loss among women than men but also caused higher rates of nausea and vomiting.

Luis-Emilio García-Perez, the Eli Lilly scientist who undertook that study, said the company did not know why the results differed between the two groups.

Ilya Yuffa, Eli Lilly’s head of international operations, said it was still unclear whether new treatments would have fewer side effects and would allow the anticipated broad take-up of the drugs.

“For the other molecules that are in development that may have new approaches, I think it’s probably too early to have a clear view of what they look like in broader populations,” said Yuffa.

FT : Italy retains allure for rich Europeans fleeing higher taxes

Italy retains allure for rich Europeans fleeing higher taxes
Doubling of flat-tax regime does not dissuade global super-rich from shifting residency to the country

Wealthy UK and French taxpayers still want to relocate to Italy despite Rome’s recent decision to double its flat tax on the foreign income of rich expats to €200,000 a year.

With the looming abolition of Britain’s historic “non-dom” tax regime, advisers claim Italy remains a highly attractive alternative.

“People move not just because of tax, but because they might like the Italian Riviera, the Italian Alps, the architecture, culture, people,” said Miles Dean, head of international tax at accountancy firm Andersen, who claimed non-doms were looking to leave the UK “in huge numbers”.

Several consultants in the Eurozone’s third-largest economy say they are receiving a steady stream of inquiries from France, where an unstable political climate has fuelled concerns over higher taxes on the wealthy.

In August, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s rightwing government unexpectedly doubled Italy’s annual levy on overseas income for new tax residents to €200,000 a year.

The move followed grumbles among Italians about the fairness of a flat tax rate set in 2016 as part of a post-Brexit push to lure wealthy people away from the UK. The scheme is estimated to have attracted 2,730 multimillionaires, including oligarchs, private equity investors and even sportspeople, most of whom have set up residence in Milan.

However, Meloni said her government had “considered it right” to update a tax incentive that had seemed “extremely generous”, as the original €100,000 flat tax had not increased since the scheme’s inception.

“The increase from €100,000 to €200,000 does not make a huge difference for multimillionaires that have large foreign incomes,” said Marco Cerrato, partner at tax firm Maisto e Associati in Milan. “Individuals that we have been advising and that have planned to transfer to Italy after 2025 have not changed their plans.”

Maurizio Fresca, an international tax consultant at Italian law firm Chiomenti, said his clients were not so much concerned about the higher tax but about “the politics” behind Rome’s decision, and what that might suggest about the scheme’s long-term durability.

“When high net worth individuals want to relocate to another country, €100,000 a year is not something that holds them back,” Fresca said. “They want to be reassured that this regime will be in force in the future.”

Fresca said Meloni’s government had increased the tax amount to defuse growing public discontent about generous incentives for wealthy foreigners.

“The Italian government wants to avoid a political discussion about the fairness of the lump sum,” Fresca said, adding that €100,000 was seen as “cheap” after several years of high inflation.

Consultants also said Rome had handled the change deftly.

The new rate will only apply to newcomers establishing tax residency in Italy after the change was approved, while existing participants are grandfathered in at the old rate. No other detail has been altered, which had served to reinforce a sense of the scheme’s stability.

Jacopo Zamboni, executive director for private clients at Henley & Partners, which helps wealthy people obtain investment visas and foreign citizenships, said the tax rise was “not perceived as legal uncertainty”.

“Clients see it as an adaptation of the price to the current circumstances,” he said.

Zamboni said inquiries about Italy from British and French residents were up 10 per cent in August this year compared with August 2023.

The increase in the flat tax is expected to discourage some people without sufficient foreign assets or income from making an Italian move. But Cerrato said that could help to avoid a situation in which the incentive scheme is abolished due to “an excessive influx of wealthy foreigners that impact the housing market”.

The participants pay the flat tax on all overseas income and assets for up to 15 years, while shielding them from tax claims elsewhere through double tax treaties.

Many potential beneficiaries were initially wary, given Italy’s reputation for quick changes of government and rapid shifts in policy. But the incentives have proved surprisingly durable. So far they have survived five governments. 

The abolition of the non-dom regime in the UK, alongside plans by the new Labour government to raise taxes, has led some current UK residents to consider moving elsewhere.

In France, an inconclusive parliamentary election in July had prompted a flood of calls from wealthy French residents to their advisers seeking options to shift their assets, were a leftwing alliance to take power and reintroduce wealth taxes.

A conservative, Michel Barnier, has instead been appointed prime minister since, although uncertainty over whether the government will hold has added to incentives for people to look for alternatives.

Italy is one of several popular destinations, which also include traditional tax havens Monaco and Switzerland, as well as Dubai, Greece, Cyprus and Malta.

Tax is not the only factor that drives people’s decision making, advisers say. “A lot of these things come down to lifestyle, connectivity,” Dean said. “There is no one size fits all.”

FT : European governments offload €16bn of bailed-out bank stocks

European governments offload €16bn of bailed-out bank stocks
Sales include stakes in Commerzbank, NatWest, ABN Amro and Monte dei Paschi di Siena

European governments have offloaded more than €16bn of bailed-out bank stocks over the past year, as they seek to draw a line under the long-running effects of the global financial crisis.

A Financial Times analysis of corporate filings and regulatory statements showed that disposals of bank stocks have ramped up over the past 12 months as governments have capitalised on share price surges driven by higher interest rates.

Yet the governments are mostly recouping just a fraction of the taxpayer money they ploughed into their domestic lenders a decade and half ago to save them from collapse.

“The experience of holding stakes in banks has taught governments the importance of cutting losses early, as full recovery of investments might not be realistic,” said Filippo Alloatti, head of financials credit at fund manager Federated Hermes.

Further disposals are expected in the coming months as the Greek and Italian governments are on course to return their large bailed-out banks to the private sector by the end of the year, while the UK and Irish governments could divest their stakes next year.

The sell-offs have created opportunities for banks considering takeovers of their rivals. This week UniCredit bought a 4.5 per cent stake in Commerzbank from the German government for €702mn, adding to a holding it already had in the bank and raising its stake to 9 per cent.

UniCredit chief executive Andrea Orcel said this week the stake-building could lead to a full-on takeover approach, echoing a similar move on Greek lender Alpha Bank last year, where UniCredit bought the government’s 9 per cent stake for €293mn.

The Greek government, which injected €50bn into its four largest lenders to prop them up during the country’s long-running debt crisis, has raised more than €1.7bn over the past year by selling out of Alpha Bank, Eurobank and Piraeus Bank. It has also sold €1bn of stock in National Bank and is expected to sell off its remaining 18 per cent stake in the business in the coming weeks.

The biggest seller over the past year has been the UK Treasury, which has offloaded £5.5bn (€6.5bn) of stock from NatWest and reduced its stake from 38.5 per cent to just under 18 per cent since December.

The UK government injected £45.5bn into NatWest — then known as Royal Bank of Scotland — and took an 84 per cent stake in the business in two bailouts in 2008 and 2009. Since then, it has gradually been selling down its holding and receiving dividends. Its remaining 18 per cent stake is worth around £5bn. 


Other countries to have sold down their stakes include the Netherlands, where the Dutch government last week sold €1.2bn of stock in ABN Amro, though it retains a 40.5 per cent stake in a bank it spent €22bn bailing out in 2008.

The Irish government has also raised €2.6bn over the past 12 months by reducing its stake in AIB, which received €21bn of taxpayer support, from 46 per cent to 22 per cent.

And the Italian finance ministry has reduced its stake in Monte dei Paschi di Siena from 64 per cent to 27 per cent since November, raising €1.6bn, and could divest its remaining stake by the end of the year.

European banks have seen their profits turbocharged in the past three years on the back of surging interest rates. Banks generate profits on the difference between the interest they receive from borrowers and pay out to depositors. These profits increase when interest rates rise.

The Euro Stoxx Banks index, which tracks the continent’s biggest lenders, has risen nearly 30 per cent over the past year.

Yet even as the European Central Bank has started cutting interest rates, some analysts predict lenders’ share prices will continue to rise.

“We believe bank equities remain too cheap and will gradually earn a re-rating higher as profitability gains are proven to be more sustainable than the market currently assumes,” said Andrew Stimpson, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.

WSJ : The Suave Italian Banker Who Wants to Be the Jamie Dimon of Europe

The Suave Italian Banker Who Wants to Be the Jamie Dimon of Europe
Andrea Orcel has teed up UniCredit for a potential takeover of rival Commerzbank. He wants to build something Europe lacks—a banking champion.

Andrea Orcel made his name helping banks choose the moment to pounce on a rival. Last week, the CEO of Italy’s deal-hungry UniCredit UCG -0.78%decrease; red down pointing triangle made his own move on Germany’s Commerzbank CBK 4.17%increase; green up pointing triangle.

Teeing up a possible takeover, UniCredit bought 9% of Commerzbank’s shares, half of them from the German government. His vision: build a European champion, capable of financing people and companies across the region seamlessly and profitably—and take back business lost to American rivals as Europe’s banking industry emerges from a dire decade.

Orcel is a celebrity in European banking circles, with a suave personality and colorful history of big pay days. His botched job move from UBS to Banco Santander in 2019 ended with a lawsuit in his favor and a soured relationship with a Spanish banking dynasty.

Known for wearing a bright red gilet under his well-fitted suits, Orcel made an unexpected comeback joining UniCredit in 2021 and oversaw a quadrupling in its share price.

A full merger between UniCredit and Commerzbank isn’t a certainty, but it is an option, Orcel told Bloomberg Television Thursday. “Europe needs stronger banks,” he said.

The European Union has stitched together the economies of more than two dozen nations, but retains a Balkanized banking industry. Unlike the U.S., where megabanks like JPMorgan Chase easily operate across state lines, European banks are hemmed in by national interests and rules that make moving capital across borders difficult. The eurozone crisis last decade hobbled the region’s lenders, especially Italy’s big banks.

The outcome of Orcel’s efforts depends on the German government and regulators warming to a merger, among other factors. Orcel said UniCredit has been transparent with both and hasn’t hired bankers to advise on any rapid-fire takeover. Political hurdles have stopped other banks from combining, and the only recent mergers of large banks have been in-country, such as UBS’s crisis takeover of Credit Suisse last year.

Also last week, former European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, who used to sometimes work with Orcel on deals decades ago as a Goldman Sachs banker, said in a report that Europe needs some large banks spanning the continent, to fuel industry and better compete with the U.S. and China.

“The stars are aligning on this,” said Cole Smead, CEO and portfolio manager at Smead Capital Management, and a UniCredit shareholder since 2022. He said Orcel is in the right place at the right time to create a European counterweight to the biggest American banks.

As a teenager growing up in Rome, Orcel, now 61 years old, dreamed of being on Wall Street. He wrote his undergraduate dissertation on hostile takeovers and flourished in the 1990s and 2000s at Merrill Lynch in London as U.S.-style dealmaking came to Europe.

His urbane demeanor and deep knowledge impressed executives, but was the result of intense preparation, former colleagues say. The long hours and drive earned him detractors, too, who have described him as sometimes-volatile and overly demanding.

At Merrill, Orcel developed a close relationship with Emilio Botín, patriarch of the Spanish family in charge at Santander, which he advised on deals including a U.K. expansion in the 2000s. Not all went well: He advised a group including Santander and Royal Bank of Scotland to carve up Dutch giant ABN Amro in 2007.

The deal was seen as the exemplar of peak-of-the-market excess in the banking world after some of the buyers required massive bailouts in the financial crisis. Orcel collected a $38 million bonus for the year.

After Merrill, he went to UBS and held roles including heading its investment bank and U.K. arm. He encouraged demoralized staff to stay onboard in a tumultuous time for the Swiss bank, which was restructuring after its own government bailout.

In 2018, Emilio Botín’s daughter, Ana, came knocking. She had ascended to chairman after her father’s death and over dinner in New York City that summer asked Orcel to be Santander CEO.

The offer fell apart over the winter, when Santander said it couldn’t justify paying 50 million euros ($55 million) to pry him from UBS. It rescinded the deal. Orcel sued Santander for €100 million, a risky strategy that many thought might make him toxic for another bank to hire.

He spent the time off with his wife and daughter and their husky, named Flash, and joked that he had rarely gotten to see them so much during the workweek. The family have homes in Milan and in London, and a getaway in Portugal—where his wife is from—decorated with family photos, contemporary art and a life-size Darth Vader figure.

Orcel won the lawsuit and more than $75 million from Santander.

The job offer from UniCredit was another vindication, and joining in 2021 was opportune. His predecessor had shed tens of billions in bad loans and rising interest rates were reigniting profits.

Some executives—including some Orcel hired himself—left, unhappy with his style. But he pushed through changes, slashed costs, doubled down on UniCredit’s physical branch network and sped up decision-making. The bank amassed a bulging store of cash.

In late July, Orcel won a coveted Euromoney Banker of the Year award for reviving UniCredit, with peers including former boss, UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti, watching at the ceremony in London and some other former UBS colleagues going in for hugs. (Orcel and Ermotti are ski partners when they attend the annual World Economic Forum in Davos.)

Unknown to most, UniCredit was eyeing a stake in Commerzbank. A yawning gap had opened between how the market valued Commerzbank’s shares compared with UniCredit’s. Rumors that Germany’s government was looking to sell part of its stake had grown, and UniCredit quietly began to scoop up shares from other sellers. He was following advice he had long given other bank CEOs: Do your homework. Be ready. Attack.

UniCredit already owns Munich-based HypoVereinsbank—a deal Orcel advised on in 2005, heralded then as creating the first truly European bank. The Italian lender is in 13 markets including Austria, Romania and Bulgaria, and bought 9% of Greece’s Alpha Bank.

When the German government offered to sell Commerzbank shares to investors on Tuesday, interest was muted, according to people familiar with the sale. Some investors shorted the shares instead, figuring the weak demand would cause the price to fall.

UniCredit had other ideas. It offered to buy the whole block of shares for more than the market price. This squeezed the short sellers, forcing them to buy back shares and igniting a mighty rally in the stock.

To be sure, executing a large cross-border banking deal in Europe remains a tall order. Governments and powerful unions have resisted the likely job losses and branch closures.

“People have been talking about cross border banking consolidation in Europe for 25 years,” said Craig Coben, a former global head of equity capital markets at Bank of America, who worked with Orcel at Merrill Lynch. “The reason it hasn’t happened is, it’s complicated.”

>>> The Restaurant Performance Index (RPI) fell -1.3% in July to 97.7 points, th


BREAKING: The Restaurant Performance Index (RPI) fell -1.3% in July to 97.7 points, the lowest level since the 2020 lockdowns.

This index tracks the health of the restaurant industry in the US by measuring sales, customer traffic, labor, and overall business conditions.

Since 2021, this metric has fallen by ~8.0%, marking the largest drop since it was launched in 2002.

Such a low level in the index has only been seen during recessions.

Americans are pulling back on dining out as prices have been sharply rising and recently hit new all-time highs.

Since 2020, food prices away from home have increased by 27.0%, and fast food prices have jumped by 31.0%.

Eating out is officially a luxury.