FT : Nvidia chief Jensen Huang condemns US chip curbs on China as ‘a failure’

Nvidia chief Jensen Huang condemns US chip curbs on China as ‘a failure’
World’s top AI semiconductor maker says export controls have accelerated Chinese rivals’ advances

Nvidia chief Jensen Huang has condemned US export controls designed to limit China’s access to artificial intelligence chips as “a failure” that spurred Chinese rivals to accelerate development of their own products.

In strongly worded criticisms of chip policies pursued by successive US administrations, the chief executive of the world’s leading AI processor maker also criticised Washington’s decision to ban an Nvidia product designed specifically for the Chinese market.

He told a news conference at the Computex tech show in Taipei on Wednesday that export controls had turbocharged Chinese rivals, led by tech giant Huawei, to build competitive AI hardware. 

“Four years ago, Nvidia had 95 per cent market share in China. Today, it is only 50 per cent,” he said. “The rest is Chinese technology. They have a lot of local technology they would use if they didn’t have Nvidia.”

Huang added: “Chinese AI researchers will use their own chips. They will use the second best. Local companies are very determined, and export controls gave them the spirit, and government support accelerated their development. Our competition is intense in China.”

Washington’s restrictions on sending advanced AI chips to China have prompted Chinese tech giants, including Tencent and Alibaba, to accelerate their purchases of domestic AI chips. The Financial Times has previously reported that Beijing has issued guidance to its tech companies to buy local AI chips in a bid to reduce dependence on imported technology.

The Trump administration in April effectively banned Nvidia from selling the H20, its watered-down AI chip tailored to align with former export controls, prompting a $5.5bn writedown by the company. Huang reiterated that Nvidia had no plans to roll out another product in its “Hopper” series for the China market, saying the company had already “degraded the chip so severely”. 

Huang also slammed the Biden-era AI diffusion rule, which was set to take effect on May 15 and would have created a three-tier licensing system for AI chips used in data centres.

“The fundamental assumptions that led to the AI diffusion rule in the beginning have proven to be fundamentally flawed,” said Huang. “If the US wants to stay ahead, we need to maximise and accelerate our diffusion, not limit it.”

His comments come after the US and United Arab Emirates last week announced a plan to build the largest group of AI data centres outside America, which will be supported by Nvidia’s chips.

The Trump administration has said it is rescinding the planned diffusion regulation and is drafting a new rule that would allow US technology to flourish, but without enabling adversarial nations to access its technology. It is not clear when the rules will be finalised, but an administration official has cautioned they would take some time to implement. 

In a bid to halt the global spread of Chinese AI tech, the US government has warned companies against using AI silicon from China, including Huawei’s Ascend processors. The Chinese commerce ministry lambasted the move on Monday, calling on the US to “immediately correct its wrongdoings” and stop “discriminatory” practices.

>>> Tesla: Elon Musk inteviewed by David Faber on CNBC (343.82 +1.73)

Tesla: Elon Musk inteviewed by David Faber on CNBC
  • Musk sees no need to buy Uber (UBER). Tesla owners will be able to add cars to the autonomous fleet to rent out like AirBNB when not using their car.
  • Musk would like increased control at Tesla, enough control to not get ousted by activist investors. He has said this before.
  • Did you damage the company going to DOGE? He says Tesla did a massive retooling of its lines. Shares have rebounded.
  • Expects autonomous cars to grow rapidly.
  • He expects to buy a lot of GPUs from NVDA for xAI "big time."

>>> US After Hours Summary: PANW -4.2% lower on earnings; WOLF -58.2% on WSJ rep

After Hours Summary: PANW -4.2% lower on earnings; WOLF -58.2% on WSJ report it's preparing to file for bankruptcy; TOL +5.4% higher on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: FINV +6.9%, TUYA +5.9%, KEYS +5.5%, TOL +5.4%, EVLV +2.9%, MOD +1.8%, JHX +1.1%, XP +0.5% (also authorizes new R$1 bln share repurchase program; also approves cancellation of existing treasury Class A shares), ZTO +0.3%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: KHC +2.2% (has been evaluating potential strategic transactions; also Berkshire will no longer hold Board seats), SDHC +1.5% (two directors disclose insider buys), GD +0.3% (awarded a $199 mln US Navy contract), ORKA +0.2% (first participants dosed in Phase 1 Trial of ORKA-002), NOC +0.2% (increases dividend), RBC +0.1% (RBC to acquire VACCO Industries from ESE for $310 mln), SWX +0.1% (SWX offering 9 mln shares of CTRI)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: PANW -4.2%, VSAT -0.8%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: WOLF -58.2% (preparing to file for bankruptcy within weeks, according to WSJ), QXO -10.2% (launches stock offering totaling $1 bln), CTRI -6.7% (SWX offering 9 mln shares of CTRI), CRI -6.7% (lowers dividend), GRDN -6.4% (announces launch of 7.5 mln share offering, comprised of 6,059,553 shares by selling stockholders and 1,440,447 newly issued shares offered by Guardian), CIFR -6.3% ($250 mln convertible notes offering), GTX -5.5% (announces 17 mln share offering by selling shareholders; 2 mln share concurrent repurchase by GTX), TTWO -3.9% ($1 bln stok offering), TPG -3.8% (DB Holdings to offer 21 mln shares), NU -3.8% (COO stepping down), IONQ -0.8% (partners with Sweden's Einride to develop quantum supply chain), VLY -0.6% (stock offering by selling shareholder), LOGI -0.4% (increases dividend), UBER -0.3% (Musk says Tesla sees no need to buy UBER, according to CNBC), ESE -0.1% (RBC to acquire VACCO Industries from ESE for $310 mln), NIC -0.1% (increases dividend), BAM -0.1% (files for $2.5 bln mixed securities shelf offering), TSLA -0.1% (Musk confirms Tesla plan for robotaxis, says Tesla has seen seen a major rebound in demand, sees no need to buy UBER, according to CNBC)

>>> US Close Dow -0.27% S&P -0.39% Nasdaq -0.38% Russell +0.05%

Closing Stock Market Summary

The S&P 500 had a six-session win streak going, but on the seventh day it rested. There were no gains today as the stock market operated in consolidation mode following the massive run from the April 7 low. The Dow and Nasdaq followed suit, posting modest losses of their own, while the Russell 2000 was flat.

There wasn't any U.S. economic data of note to drive things, and the corporate news was limited. There was some added attention on President Trump's visit to Capitol Hill to discuss his objectives for the reconciliation bill with House GOP members. Reportedly, he told them not to mess with Medicaid cuts and rebuked the efforts by the SALT Caucus to raise the deduction limit beyond the $30,000 currently proposed, telling them to "let it go."

There was some chatter that neither camp was fully swayed by the president's exhortations, so there was a component of uncertainty around the reconciliation bill that contributed to the consolidation effort.

Overall, there wasn't much conviction in today's selling action. Eight S&P 500 sectors finished lower, but only one -- energy (-1.0%) -- declined at least 1.0%. Losses for the remaining sectors ranged from 0.2% to 0.8%. The three winning sectors -- utilities (+0.3%), health care (+0.3%), and consumer staples (+0.2%) -- reflected a more defensive-minded tape.

Market breadth skewed negative. Decliners led advancers by an 8-to-5 margin at the NYSE and by a roughly 11-to-10 margin at the Nasdaq.

Dow component Home Depot (HD 377.05, -2.21, -0.6%) was among the decliners, losing ground after a mixed Q1 report that featured an EPS miss, a revenue beat, a reaffirmation of FY26 guidance, and a declaration that the company does not plan to raise prices due to tariffs.

Alphabet (GOOG 165.32, -2.55, -1.5%) was another decliner amid its I/O event; meanwhile, Tesla (TSLA 343.82, +1.73, +0.5%) slotted into the advancers column but finished well off its session high of $354.98. Mega-cap stocks, in general, were softer today, which fit with today's consolidation bias, but they showed some vigor in the closing stages to help the indices come back from lower levels as the closing bell approached. The Vanguard Mega-Cap Growth ETF (MGK) declined 0.5% after being down 1.2%.

FT : Thames Water freezes executives’ ‘retention payments’ after backlash

Thames Water freezes executives’ ‘retention payments’ after backlash
Crisis talks with regulator and government led to agreement to pause controversial payouts

Thames Water has agreed to pause executives’ lavish retention payments that were agreed as part of a £3bn emergency loan after a furious backlash from the Labour government. 

Crisis talks with regulator Ofwat, the government, the utility, and its creditors held over the weekend agreed to “pause and reconsider the retention payments”, said one person close to Thames Water. “All the parties recognise that the payments are a distraction from the major issues at hand.”

Steve Reed, environment secretary, welcomed Thames Water’s decision to withdraw the controversial payments, saying that handing the money out would have been “the wrong thing to do”.

The decision by the UK’s largest water company comes just days after a war of words between the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Thames Water’s management over whether the utility would be able to press ahead with the payouts. 

The company, which serves about a quarter of the country’s population, is struggling under the weight of its £20bn debt mountain and is in exclusive discussions with the private equity firm KKR to take over the business as it attempts to avoid temporary renationalisation. The utility came perilously close to running out of money before it agreed the £3bn loan this year with its senior creditors, including US hedge funds Elliott Management and Silver Point.

Details of the company’s retention payments emerged last week when Thames Water chair Sir Adrian Montague told parliamentarians that the payouts could involve as much as half of annual salary for some of the beleaguered utility’s top executives. 

The company initially insisted that it would be able to sidestep attempts by ministers to stop the generous payouts. Defra officials in turn said on Friday that they would “not stand idly by if Thames bosses try to plunder the company for personal gain”. 

Reed confirmed to a session of the environment select committee on Tuesday that the plans had been scrapped. 

“Just over the last few days we have seen a very unfortunate situation where Thames Water appeared to be attempting to circumvent that ban, calling their bonuses something different so they can continue to pay them,” he said. “I am very happy indeed that Thames have now dropped those proposals.”

At issue has been whether the government has the powers to block the payments, which would be paid for out of the £3bn loan, which comes with a 9.75 per cent interest rate, plus fees.

Defra has passed a Water Act that will give Ofwat greater powers to claw back bonuses in certain circumstances, for example where the company has failed in its financial or environmental performance.

But Thames Water argued last week that the retention bonuses did not fall under the government’s new legislation because they are not performance-related. 

The company had already admitted it would raise pay packages to compensate for the bonus restrictions.

Feargal Sharkey, the pop star-turned-environmental campaigner, accused the government of “pantomime politics” in focusing on the bonus issue. “It’s the kind of policy that will grab headlines but achieve nothing and deliver even less,” he said.

The payment of bonuses has become a lightning rod for public anger against water companies including Thames, which has raised bills by at least a third this year. 

“It has never been the Thames Water board’s intention to be at odds with the government’s ambition to reform the water industry,” the company said in a statement. “Following recent discussions the Board has decided to pause the retention scheme and await forthcoming guidance from the regulator [ . . . ] to ensure our approach supports both our turnaround objectives and broader public expectations.”

FT : Chanel profits drop sharply as luxury downturn bites

Chanel profits drop sharply as luxury downturn bites
French luxury house ‘very cautious’ on outlook as profits decline following aggressive price rises

Chanel’s profits dropped a third last year as the privately held French luxury house defended its aggressive price rises in the run-up to a global luxury downturn.

Chanel, privately held and which has headquarters in the UK, said on Tuesday that its operating profits fell almost a third to $4.5bn in 2024, compared with a year earlier.

Sales dropped 4.3 per cent to $18.7bn, led by Asia, where sales fell 7.1 per cent to $9.2bn. It was the first time that sales and operating profits both fell at Chanel since 2020, when the pandemic forced store closures.

“Macroeconomic and geopolitical volatility is unquestionably challenging,” Chanel’s global chief executive Leena Nair told the Financial Times. “We’ve seen these conditions have an impact on sales in some markets.”

The sharp decline in profits came before any impact from US President Donald Trump’s erratic tariff regime. Nair said she was “very cautious” for Chanel’s outlook in 2025 in an environment that remained “extremely uncertain”. 

“We’ve been here a hundred years, we have navigated ebbs and flows,” Nair added.

Chanel, founded by designer Coco Chanel, has pushed through some of the sharpest price increases in the luxury industry in recent years, leading some customers to complain of a disconnect between price tags and product creativity and quality.

For example, the price of a classic Chanel flap bag has more than doubled to top €10,000 since 2019, compared with a 50 per cent rise in the average price of luxury goods, according to analysts at HSBC.

Chanel’s global chief financial officer Philippe Blondiaux pushed back against the idea that price increases had dented sales, saying that he believed consumers “totally understand that the price of the Chanel items they buy is commensurate with the quality of the raw materials”.

He added that Chanel raised prices by about 3 per cent in 2024 on its so-called fashion products, and prices would probably rise by a similar amount this year.

Chanel’s weak results underscore the challenges facing newly appointed artistic director Matthieu Blazy, formerly of Bottega Veneta, who started in April. Blazy will present his first collection in October.

Despite its struggles, Chanel invested at record levels last year. Capital expenditure, including spending on store acquisitions, increased 43 per cent to $1.75bn.

The company invested in silk manufacturer Montero, a metal jewellery maker and tanneries as part of a 10-year project to control more of its supply chain. The house also spent $2.4bn on so-called brand activities, such as fashion shows and events for clients.

Blondiaux said the investments were being made so that Blazy arrived with the “best possible conditions”.

The group is planning to make another $1.8bn of capital expenditure this year, as well as a “record” $600mn spending on further integration of its supply chain, Blondiaux added.

“We are financially solid, and we have a long-term view and long-term approach to everything we do,” he said.

Few luxury groups have managed to come through the industry downturn unscathed. Sales at industry leader LVMH declined 2 per cent last year, while Kering’s sales slumped 14 per cent because of weak demand at Gucci.

However, other top-end brands in a similar category to Chanel — including Hermès and Brunello Cucinelli — both grew sales by double digit percentages last year.

WWD : Chanel Revenues, Profits Fall in 2024 as China Slowdown Bites

Chanel Revenues, Profits Fall in 2024 as China Slowdown Bites
The French fashion house sees no quick fix in 2025, despite the arrival of Matthieu Blazy as creative director.

PARIS — The Chanel juggernaut came to a halt last year, as revenues fell for the first time since the coronavirus pandemic and operating profits plummeted 30 percent amid a sharp slowdown in luxury spending in mainland China.

The French fashion house reported on Tuesday that revenues totaled $18.7 billion in 2024, down 4.3 percent at comparable rates, as growth in Japan and South Korea failed to offset the impact of macroeconomic and geopolitical volatility elsewhere.

Operating profit fell to $4.5 billion from $6.4 billion the previous year as Chanel continued to invest heavily in its store network and supply chain.

In an interview with WWD, global chief executive officer Leena Nair and chief financial officer Philippe Blondiaux said they saw an inflection in the first quarter of 2024 and expect little improvement this year, despite the arrival of Matthieu Blazy as artistic director of fashion activities on April 1.

“We continue to operate in a very challenging environment,” said Nair, adding that the house is taking a long-term view. “As a 100-year-[old] brand, we expect ebbs and flows, and we will continue to navigate with a long-term strategy, which is why last year, we invested more than ever in our fundamentals.”

Chanel has declared a hiring freeze, with plans to maintain its headcount stable at 38,400 this year after hiring 10,000 people in the last three years, including 1,900 in 2024, mostly in the first semester, Blondiaux said.

The privately owned company said earlier this year it was cutting 70 roles in the U.S., representing about 2.5 percent of its workforce there. Blondiaux denied reports that it plans to slash its headcount in China by 20 percent this year, clarifying that it plans “relatively minor” adjustments in regions where growth has stalled.

“For a company of our size going through this change of cycle, it’s normal, I would say, to adapt your structures in different places,” he said. “In China, we are adjusting our workforce to a large extent through natural attrition.”

Investments are also expected to remain stable, after a 43 percent jump last year, with capital expenditure forecast at $1.8 billion in 2025. Chanel plans to plug a record $600 million into its manufacturing network, as illustrated by its purchase of a minority stake in Como-based silk specialist Mantero, Blondiaux noted.

Among its key acquisitions last year was a 25 percent stake in Swiss high-end watchmaker MB&F, as well as the building housing its boutique on Avenue Montaigne in Paris.

Investments in “brand-support activities” were broadly stable at $2.45 billion in 2024, versus $2.46 billion the previous year, with key initiatives including a new No.5 campaign featuring Margot Robbie, the new face of the fragrance, and Jacob Elordi.

“We set our own course in challenging economic conditions. We could have slowed down the momentum of investment. We’ve done the opposite. We’ve invested more than ever, and plan to do so in 2025 as well,” Nair said.

She detailed plans to open 48 new stores this year, including 22 new boutiques across key markets such as the U.S. and China, in addition to expansions in less-developed territories like India and Canada.

Chanel has prioritized Greater China for events, staging a repeat show of its cruise collection in Hong Kong last November, and presenting its Métiers d’Art line in Hangzhou in December, which Nair billed as its most viewed show ever. It garnered 84.3 million views across social media platforms including Weibo and Douyin, the brand said.

“We have about 127 boutiques across China, and we opened 15 last year. We’ll continue to open 15 this year,” she said. “We’ve invested in new cities like Chengdu, Nanjing, to talk to our client base that’s diversifying in China, so there’s a lot to look forward to in China.”

Chanel ended the year with 644 boutiques, up from 612 at the end of 2023, with openings including its first U.S. store dedicated to watches and fine jewelry on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue, and its inaugural House of Beauty in Paris.

Nair emphasized that although Blazy will show his first collection in October, Chanel is not expecting immediate results.

“Matthieu is one of the most talented and gifted designers of his generation. His vision and understanding of the Chanel codes quickly convinced us that there is no one else better suited for the job, and we were very impressed by his mastery of natural, luxurious materials, his deep commitment to craftsmanship, the amount of time he spends in workshops, ateliers, really understanding the product and the craftsmanship,” she noted.

“Chanel is a profound brand. It takes time to understand the depth and the essence of our brand,” Nair continued. “We are having patience and perspective as Matthieu settles into his job. We don’t just think about the next collection or the October collection, but look at it long-term, because we know a vision takes time to unfold and it has impact over time.”

She paid tribute to the studio team, which has designed collections since June 2024, and thanked former creative director Virginie Viard for her contribution, noting that Chanel’s revenues nearly doubled over the previous three years.

Nair also highlighted key launches this year, including Chance Eau Splendide, which she flagged as the house’s first new fragrance in eight years, and the Chanel 25 handbag, which she
Blondiaux said that after growing 23 percent in 2023, ready-to-wear sales have remained relatively resilient despite the absence of a creative figurehead — though he declined to provide figures.

“Ready-to-wear was one of the best-performing product lines last year and this year, year-to-date, we are positive in terms of growth with ready-to-wear, so it really shows that the quality of the work done by the studio has been amazing, even in the absence of a creative director,” the executive said.

But Chanel appears to have lost some of its pricing power amid growing criticism of a series of hikes that pushed the price of its signature Medium Classic bag above $10,000.

After several years of twice-yearly price increases to reflect inflation in raw materials and harmonize its prices between different regions, it raised prices for fashion by 3 percent in 2024, in line with global inflation.

“It was more or less the same for all the product lines on average,” Blondiaux said. “And for 2025, we plan more or less to increase prices in the same way.” In the U.S., the brand is taking a wait-and-see attitude to prospective trade tariffs amid ongoing negotiations with the European Union.

Blondiaux declined to delve into the reasons why Chanel, which is owned by the secretive Wertheimer family, underperformed leading luxury sector peers last year. Hermès revenues rose 14.7 percent in comparable terms to 15.17 billion euros, while luxury conglomerate LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton said revenues rose 1 percent to 86.15 billion euros.

“We never compare ourselves with competition, because we think our portfolio is obviously different from LVMH, we are operating in different geographies,” he said. “We are confident that the consistency of our long-term approach and the unique strengths of the Chanel brand position us very well for the future.”

Reuters : German chipmaker Infineon to work with Nvidia on power delivery chips

German chipmaker Infineon to work with Nvidia on power delivery chips

SAN FRANCISCO, May 20 (Reuters) - German chipmaker Infineon (IFXGn.DE), opens new tab said on Tuesday it will work with Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab on developing chips for new power delivery systems inside artificial intelligence data centers.

Infineon said it will work with Nvidia to develop high-voltage, direct current power delivery systems. In current data centers, most high-voltage power is distributed as alternating current and then converted to the direct current needed by computer chips by individual power supply units inside of servers.

But that method of distributing power introduces losses in moving power around and converting it. With each server rack within AI data centers expected to take a megawatt of power by the end of the decade, Infineon and Nvidia said they are hoping to reduce those losses by creating a centralized direct-current distribution system.

“Through this innovative approach, Nvidia is able to optimize the energy consumption of our advanced AI infrastructure, which supports our commitment to sustainability while also delivering the performance and scalability required for the next generation of AI workloads,” Gabriele Gorla, vice president of system engineering at Nvidia, said in a statement.

FT : Chinese direct investment in Europe rises for first time in 7 years

Chinese direct investment in Europe rises for first time in 7 years
Report shows pivot to greenfield projects, but €10bn FDI in 2024 still far below 2016 peak

Chinese investment in Europe rose for the first time in seven years in 2024, driven by a surge in electric vehicle and battery projects in Hungary, even as Chinese firms increasingly shunned the UK, Germany and France.

Total Chinese foreign direct investment in the EU and UK climbed 47 per cent to €10bn last year, according to data from the Berlin-based Mercator Institute for China Studies and consultancy Rhodium Group.

While the rebound marked a break in the downward trend, total FDI was just a fifth of the 2016 peak and was heavily concentrated among a small group of firms, including battery makers CATL and Envision, tech group Tencent and carmaker Geely.

“The EU remains attractive for Chinese investment,” said Max Zenglein, chief economist at Merics. But he warned that Beijing could increasingly deploy corporate investment as “a tool for strategic influence”.

Facing mounting political scrutiny and trade tensions, Chinese companies have pivoted from mergers and acquisitions to greenfield investments. CATL’s €7.5bn battery facility in Debrecen and BYD’s planned €5bn electric vehicle plant in Szeged — both in Hungary — are emblematic of the shift.

Hungary accounted for 31 per cent of all Chinese investment in Europe in 2024, retaining its position as the top destination for a second consecutive year. In contrast, the combined share of the UK, Germany and France fell to just 20 per cent, down from an average of 52 per cent over the previous five years.

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, widely seen as China’s closest supporter within the EU, sees Chinese capital as providing a vital pillar to the economy amid weak domestic growth.

China’s carmakers are under pressure to expand abroad as they grapple with overcapacity and faltering demand at home. The EU’s decision last October to impose tariffs of up to 45 per cent on Chinese car imports has further incentivised local production within the bloc.

Nevertheless, the study noted a sharp drop in new investment announcements by Chinese electric-vehicle manufacturers — down 79 per cent last year compared with 2022—2023 levels. Battery-maker Svolt, for instance, abandoned plans for two plants in Germany worth €4.2bn, while a European Commission preliminary foreign subsidy investigation into BYD’s Hungary plant could further dampen momentum, it said.

The decline was partially offset by a modest uptick in M&A. Tencent acquired Polish video game developer Techland for €1.5bn, though such dealmaking activity is expected to remain subdued. The traditional motivation for M&A — access to Western technology — has waned as China builds its own R&D capabilities.

Chinese investment in strategic sectors such as renewable energy is also drawing heightened scrutiny across Europe. Yet the authors of the study saw scope for a short-term easing in tensions, as some EU member states sought to avoid simultaneous trade conflicts with both Beijing and Washington, while China renewed a charm offensive aimed at Brussels.

FT : GB News investor Paul Marshall calls for break-up of ‘giant toad’ BBC

GB News investor Paul Marshall calls for break-up of ‘giant toad’ BBC
Right-leaning media baron says ‘anti-competitive’ national broadcaster distorts UK’s media market

Paul Marshall, the hedge fund boss and co-owner of GB News, has called for the BBC to be broken up or sold, in a speech describing the national broadcaster as “an embodiment of anti-competitive market distortion”.

Marshall, who also owns The Spectator magazine and online media group UnHerd, gave a lecture at Oxford university on Tuesday arguing that the BBC was “held to a lower standard of impartiality than any other channel” and that it marks its “own homework”.

He described the BBC as squatting “like a giant toad in the middle of the UK media landscape, an embodiment of anti-competitive market distortion, as well as the source of many of the worst cases of media bias”.

The British hedge fund boss suggested a solution would be to sell the BBC. “As long as the BBC remains a ward of the state, it will continue to be the propaganda arm of the state”, Marshall said.

He argued that, at the least, the BBC should be broken up between its public service elements, such as news, and commercially focused activities, such as the BBC Studios production company.

A BBC spokesperson said: “The BBC is the number one brand for media in the UK, used by 95 per cent of UK adults on average per month, and the most used and trusted news provider.

“We . . . are engaging with the public and government on what the long term future of the BBC should look like.”

Last week, BBC director-general Tim Davie said in a speech that “trust in the BBC went up in 2024” because of its focus on “impartiality and transparency”.

He pointed to its work tackling the risks of disinformation, as well as “doubling down on impartiality, championing free, fair reporting alongside landmark investigative journalism . . . as well as increasing transparency and frankly holding our nerve amidst culture wars”.

Separately, Marshall complained that UnHerd had been the victim of an online shadow ban — in effect, he argued, being pushed to the margins by algorithms that can dictate what is better read and watched online.

He said that social media platforms should be required to publish all algorithms which they use to analyse or influence user preferences. “Elon Musk believes in open source and transparency for manufacturing. He should do the same for X,” he said.

Marshall also said that Sky — which owns a news channel that competes with GB News — had been moved “to the progressive left” by its US owner, Comcast, “effectively becoming a clone of the BBC”.

He predicted Sky would drop out of regular news coverage in the UK once Comcast’s 10-year commitment to invest in UK news expires. Sky declined to comment.

Marshall has in recent years emerged as one of the UK’s most influential right-leaning media barons.

A self-styled “classical liberal”, Marshall built his fortune as co-founder of London-based hedge fund Marshall Wace. Since its launch in 1997, it has grown into one of the world’s leading hedge funds, with over $70bn in assets under management. 

Marshall is also chair of Marshall Wace Asset Management but holds his media investments in a private capacity.

Marshall’s first foray into the media industry came in 2017 with the purchase of UnHerd. Soon after, he invested in upstart British broadcaster GB News.

In September last year Marshall boosted his growing British media empire with the acquisition of conservative weekly magazine The Spectator for £100mn. The move prompted the resignation of Spectator chair Andrew Neil, who had previously said that hedge fund managers should not be allowed to own newspapers because of potential conflicts of interest