GM Signs Multibillion-Dollar Deal for Supply of EV Battery Materials
Under the agreement, Vianode will build production facilities in North America
General Motors GM 2.02%increase; green up pointing triangle signed a multibillion-dollar deal with Norway’s Vianode for the delivery of a material critical for electric-vehicle batteries, the companies said Wednesday.
Vianode will supply synthetic anode graphite that will be used in next-generation EV batteries produced by Ultium Cells, GM’s battery joint venture with LG Energy Solution.
“This project will help advance our battery technology and drive greater value to our customers,” said Jeff Morrison, GM’s senior vice president of global purchasing and supply chain.
The Norwegian company will build production facilities in North America and be ready to start shipping the material from 2027, with the deal running through 2033. The companies didn’t provide further financial details.
Anode graphite is the largest component of a lithium-ion battery by weight, playing a crucial role that allows high conductivity, performance and charge capacity. China is the world’s biggest graphite producer, with large natural reserves, synthetic production and refining capacity, but the country recently tightened export restrictions of the material amid a technology trade spat with the U.S.
“Our recent creation of Vianode North America and this agreement to supply GM’s North American EV business, are key building blocks for a local, resilient supply chain for critical battery materials outside of Asia,” Vianode Chief Executive Burkhard Straube said in a statement.
Vianode already has a plant in Heroya, Norway, which started production in the second half of 2024. The company said its synthetic anode graphite has a 90% lower carbon-dioxide footprint than conventional production methods.
Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance:
In reaction to earnings/guidance:
- VCEL -10.1%, CVGW -5.8%, APLD -5.6%, LASR -3.5%, PI -2.8%, KARO -2.8%
Other news:
- KROS -13.5% (has voluntarily halted all dosing in the TROPOS trial)
- BUSE -2.7% (raises dividend)
- GPRK -2.5% (Repsol's partner in SierraCol Energy Arauca has exercised its preemptive rights)
- GAU -1.6% (2024 production)
- HPP -1.4% (properties in LA undamaged)
- AQN -0.7% (CFO departing)
Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance:
In reaction to earnings/guidance:
- COMP +8.2%, AMRX +5%, WFC +3.5%, NEO +3.4%, BLK +2.4%, BK +2.3%, JPM +0.9%
Other news:
- TIGO +9.5% (approved a new shareholder remuneration policy)
- IGT +7.6% (lottery and iLottery operations have been recertified by the World Lottery Association)
- BBCP +5.3% (declares special cash dividend of $1.00 per share)
- PLUG +3.3% (announces a landmark purchase agreement with Allied Green Ammonia)
- AMPY +2.8% (enters merger agreement with Juniper Capital's Upstream Rocky Mountain portfolio companies)
- BHLB +2.2% (stock offering)
- EVTL +2.1% (names Dómhnal Slattery as Chairman)
- NOK +1.8% (signs multi-year video technologies license agreement with Samsung)
- PL +1.6% (launches Pelican-2 satellite)
- HLN +1.6% (receives pricing of secondary offering by Pfizer)
- DHT +1.1% (business update)
- KMT +1.1% (plant closures and headcount reduction)
Research Calls I
-
Upgrades:
- Adobe (ADBE) upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $425
- CareDx (CDNA) upgraded to Equal Weight from Underweight at Wells Fargo; tgt lowered to $24
- CBRE Group (CBRE) upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt raised to $160
- Centerspace (CSR) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Janney; tgt $72
- Devon Energy (DVN) upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Bernstein; tgt $45
- Digital Realty Trust (DLR) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Deutsche Bank; tgt raised to $194
- Edison (EIX) upgraded to Neutral from Sell at Ladenburg Thalmann; tgt $56.50
- EQT Corp. (EQT) upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Bernstein; tgt $73
- Healthpeak Properties (DOC) upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt $25
- KB Home (KBH) upgraded to Neutral from Sell at Seaport Research Partners
- Macerich (MAC) upgraded to Equal-Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt $20
- NNN REIT (NNN) upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt $48
- NorthWestern (NWE) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Ladenburg Thalmann; tgt $57.50
- SAP SE (SAP) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Kepler
- The Shyft Group (SHYF) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at DA Davidson; tgt $15
- Weyerhaeuser (WY) upgraded to Sector Outperform from Neutral at CIBC; tgt $35
-
Downgrades:
- Aris Water Solutions (ARIS) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt raised to $27
- Douglas Emmett (DEI) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Janney
- Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt $53
- Helmerich & Payne (HP) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $39
- Intuit (INTU) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $530
- Lam Research (LRCX) downgraded to Peer Perform from Outperform at Wolfe Research
- NNN REIT (NNN) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Janney; tgt $43
- Noble Corporation (NE) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $41
- NOV Inc. (NOV) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $18
- Safehold (SAFE) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $19
- SentinelOne (S) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at UBS; tgt lowered to $25
- SLB (SLB) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $44
- Tidewater (TDW) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $68
- Transocean (RIG) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $5
- Valaris (VAL) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt lowered to $59
- XPO, Inc. (XPO) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Stifel; tgt lowered to $124
-
Others:
- Affirm (AFRM) initiated with an Outperform at William Blair
- CNX Resources (CNX) initiated with a Hold at TD Cowen; tgt $27
- Curbline Properties (CURB) initiated with a Neutral at Compass Point; tgt $24
- Enbridge (ENB) initiated with a Buy at TD Securities
- Pembina Pipeline (PBA) initiated with a Buy at TD Securities
- SoFi Technologies (SOFI) initiated with an Outperform at William Blair
- South Bow Corporation (SOBO) initiated with a Hold at TD Securities
- TC Energy (TRP) initiated with a Buy at TD Securities
Citigroup beats by $0.12, reports revs in-line; guides FY25 revs above consensus (73.50)
- Reports Q4 (Dec) earnings of $1.34 per share, $0.12 better than the FactSet Consensus of $1.22; revenues rose 12.3% year/year to $19.58 bln vs the $19.51 bln FactSet Consensus.
- Revenues increased 12% from the prior-year period, on a reported basis, driven by growth in each of Citi's businesses and the smaller impact from the currency devaluation in Argentina, partially offset by a decline in All Other. Excluding the impact of the Argentina currency devaluation and divestiture related impacts in both periods, revenues were up 7%.
- Citigroup's total allowance for credit losses was approximately $22.2 billion at quarter end, compared to $21.8 billion at the end of the prior-year period. Total ACL on loans was approximately $18.6 billion at quarter end, compared to $18.1 billion at the end of the prior-year period, with a reserve-to-funded loans ratio of 2.7%, unchanged from the end of the prior-year period. Total non-accrual loans decreased 16% from the prior-year period to $2.7 billion. Corporate non-accrual loans decreased 27% from the prior-year period to $1.4 billion. Consumer non-accrual loans were largely unchanged from the prior-year period at $1.3 billion.
- Citigroup's end-of-period loans were $694 billion at quarter end, up 1% versus the prior-year period, largely reflecting growth in Branded Cards and Retail Banking in USPB and higher loans in Markets and Services.
- Outlook: Co issues upside guidance for FY25, sees FY25 revs of $83.5-84.5 bln vs. $83.37 bln FactSet Consensus.
- NII ex-Markets up modestly YoY
- Expenses: Slightly lower than ~$53.8 billion
- Cost of Credit: Cards NCL rates around the top of the 2024 ranges for both businesses, with higher losses in 1H, consistent with seasonal patterns, subject to changing conditions; ACL build will be a function of macroeconomic environment and business volumes
- Capital:
- Board of Directors has authorized a $20 billion common share repurchase program
- $1.5 billion of common share repurchases planned for 1Q25
Microsoft’s Gaming Business Falls Short, Despite Activision
The Takeaway
• Microsoft’s gaming revenue growth fell below targets in fiscal 2024
• Rival gaming studios are reluctant to put games onto Game Pass
• Activision has been slow to migrate to Azure
In 2021, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella faced a choice involving the company’s Xbox and cloud gaming business. The company could either acquire major game studios to drive more subscriptions to its nascent Game Pass subscription service. Or it could wind down its games business entirely, Nadella told two people at the time.
Nadella took the first path, acquiring Elder Scrolls maker Bethesda Studios for $7 billion in 2021 and Call of Duty maker Activision Blizzard for $75.4 billion in the fall of 2023. So far, the returns on the investments appear unimpressive: In the year to June, Microsoft’s gaming business revenue grew 5.8%, well below the 11% target set for the purpose of calculating part of Nadella’s compensation, according to securities filings. (That growth excludes revenue of Activision since its acquisition but includes Game Pass).
Gaming was the only section of his pay evaluation that fell short of Microsoft’s goals. Meanwhile, in the three months ending Sept. 30, Microsoft indicated that its gaming division didn’t grow at all without the first-time contribution of Activision revenue in the quarter.
For many investors, Microsoft’s performance in gaming ranks is likely less important than its progress in artificial intelligence. Questions about whether the company’s big investment in new data centers will generate a return have weighed on investors’ minds and are likely the major reason why the stock rose only 12% last year, well below the number for every other big tech firm.
Even so, given the sheer amount Microsoft has spent on gaming expansion—the Activision purchase was its biggest ever—the outcome of Nadella’s gaming bet is important in the long run.
“Seventy billion dollars is not a pittance—it’s a lot of cash. They might lose money in the short term, which is fine, as long as they can prove that in the long run Game Pass is a solid source of recurring revenue,” said Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter.
Uncharted Territory
Microsoft first launched its Game Pass subscription service in 2017. It charges customers $12 to $20 per month to access a library of PC and Xbox games from any device.
By launching the service, Microsoft is forging into uncharted territory. The company hopes to prove a business model that is now omnipresent in movies and television streaming can also prove successful in videogames.
Big gaming firms, like Activision, have historically been reluctant to put their games on an all-you-can-play subscription service, worried they would make less money than they do by selling games outright at $60 to $70 apiece. Buying Activision allowed Microsoft to change that dynamic.
Since then, however, several leading game studios have resisted Microsoft’s pitch that they should put their titles on Game Pass in exchange for fees that Microsoft offers to pay to the gaming studios, according to people familiar with the discussions.
“I just think the majority of the game market doesn’t really want a game pass” like the one Microsoft is offering, said Gus Zinn, a portfolio manager of the Macquarie Science and Technology Fund, which holds roughly $400 million in Microsoft stock and has kept its Microsoft position roughly flat over the past year.
Microsoft also hoped the Activision deal would attract game developers to rent its Azure cloud servers. But Activision wasn’t using Azure prior to the deal, and it still rents servers from Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services while primarily relying on its own servers for development, according to someone with direct knowledge of the situation and another person briefed on it.
Pushing a New Business Model
Between launch and 2021, the number of Game Pass subscribers grew to 18 million, Microsoft reported. Since 2022, Microsoft has stopped regularly reporting annual numbers, although it said in February last year that Game Pass had grown 36% since 2022 to 34 million subscribers.
Before completing the Activision acquisition, Microsoft targeted having over 100 million Game Pass subscribers by 2030, meaning it would have to triple its current subscriber base in five years—or grow at a rate of 40% annually, which would be faster than its rate of growth every year since 2020.
The company previously included Game Pass growth as one of the metrics that determined CEO Satya Nadella’s pay package, but it eliminated that provision in October 2023 after it failed to meet Game Pass growth targets in the prior two years.
When reached for comment, a Microsoft spokesperson referred to Nadella’s remarks to shareholders in October that Game Pass had set a “new revenue record” in the quarter prior and that a record number of people had signed up for Game Pass on the day Microsoft published Activision’s new Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 title.
Some shareholders say Activision’s contribution won’t matter much as long as Microsoft generates growth in other areas like cloud and artificial intelligence software sales.
“[Activision] has been disappointing,” said Denny Fish, a Janus Henderson Investors portfolio manager who oversees two funds that included a total of more than $800 million in Microsoft stock as of November. “It’s also a business that had some degree of consistency over, like, a three- to five-year period but was highly volatile from year to year, because you’re so dependent on the big releases like Call of Duty.”
However, Microsoft’s heavy spending on data centers for AI is a bigger drag on its stock price than the Activision deal, Fish said.
Early premarket gappers
Gapping up:
IGT +7.6%, TIGO +6.7%, LOT +6.4%, BBCP +5.5%, PONY +3.3%, BLK +2.8%, PL +2.1%, KARO +2.1%, HLN +1.8%, BHLB +1.7%, NOK +1.6%, NNE +1.5%, DHT +1.4%, KMT +1.1%
Gapping down:
VCEL -8.1%, APLD -6.1%, CVGW -4.8%, LASR -4.3%, EVTL -3.2%, BUSE -2.7%, GPRK -2.2%, GAU -1.6%, PI -1.5%, HPP -1.4%, FSM -1.3%
JPMorgan Chase beats by $0.72, beats on revs
- Reports Q4 (Dec) earnings of $4.81 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.72 better than the FactSet Consensus of $4.09; reported revenues rose 10.9% year/year to $42.77 bln vs the $41.9 bln FactSet Consensus.
- Net interest income excluding Markets was $23.0 billion, down 2%, driven by lower rates and deposit margin compression across the lines of business, as well as lower deposit balances in CCB. This was largely offset by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily securities reinvestment, as well as higher revolving balances in Card Services and higher wholesale deposit balances.
- Noninterest revenue excluding Markets was $13.7 billion, up 30%, largely driven by higher asset management fees in AWM and CCB, higher investment banking fees and lower net investment securities losses compared to the prior year. Markets revenue was $7.0 billion, up 21%.
- The provision for credit losses was $2.6 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $2.4 billion and a net reserve build of $267 million. Net charge-offs of $2.4 billion were up $200 million, primarily driven by Card Services. The net reserve build included a $572 million net build in Consumer, predominantly in Card Services, and a $282 million net release in Wholesale. The prior-year provision was $2.8 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $2.2 billion and a net reserve build of $598 million.
- Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO, commented: "The Firm concluded the year with a strong fourth quarter, generating net income of $14.0 billion." Dimon continued: "Each line of business posted solid results. In the CIB, clients were active, with IB fees up 49%, and Markets revenue rose 21%. Additionally, Payments fees grew by double digits for the fourth consecutive quarter, helping drive Payments revenue to a record $18.1 billion for the year. In CCB, we continued to acquire new customers across Consumer Banking, Business Banking, Card and wealth management. For example, nearly 2 million net new checking accounts were opened during 2024. Finally, in AWM, management fees rose 21%, and revenue hit a record $5.8 billion. More impressively, client asset net inflows totaled $486 billion in 2024, bringing cumulative net inflows over the past two years to $976 billion." Dimon added: "Regarding regulation, we have consistently said that regulation should be designed to effectively balance promoting economic growth and maintaining a safe and sound banking system. It is possible to achieve both goals. This is not about weakening regulation — we maintain a fortress balance sheet, evidenced by $547 billion of total loss-absorbing capacity and $1.4 trillion of cash and marketable securities — but rather about setting rules that are transparent, fair, holistic in their approach and based on rigorous data analysis, so that banks can play their critical role in the economy and markets." Dimon added: "The U.S. economy has been resilient. Unemployment remains relatively low, and consumer spending stayed healthy, including during the holiday season. Businesses are more optimistic about the economy, and they are encouraged by expectations for a more pro-growth agenda and improved collaboration between government and business. However, two significant risks remain. Ongoing and future spending requirements will likely be inflationary, and therefore, inflation may persist for some time. Additionally, geopolitical conditions remain the most dangerous and complicated since World War II. As always, we hope for the best but prepare the Firm for a wide range of scenarios."
Rolex Prices at Four-year Low on Secondhand Market
A report from Morgan Stanley and WatchCharts shows prices for watches of 35 prominent brands continued to decrease for the 11th consecutive quarter.
PARIS — The secondhand watch market is not immune to the sector’s overall downturn.
According to a new report from Morgan Stanley and WatchCharts, prices fell 5.7 percent year-on-year in 2024, affecting the “big three” — Rolex, Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet — as well as other luxury watchmakers.
The fourth quarter of the year marked the 11th consecutive quarter of decrease since May 2022’s peak prices for secondhand watches, according to the report published on Tuesday.
Overall, prices tumbled less severely but on a broader base in 2024 than in 2023, with 28 out the 35 Swiss watchmakers tracked seeing decreases of their secondhand market prices.
Only a handful of names saw positive performances this year, including Certina, Frédérique Constant, Montblanc and Longines.
Brands that struggled the most were those priced above $10,000 in average resale price that rely heavily on sports models, while all brands above $3,000 performed negatively, the data found. Entry-level watchmakers fared better, even tracking positively for the year in a handful of cases.
Rolex, Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet saw their combined market share shrink 2 percent for the year, stemming from the combination of reduced appetite for high-end models and increased demand for other brands.
The three brands were down 5 percent, 5.7 percent and 7.3 percent, respectively, while fewer of their models traded above retail.
Prices for Rolex have hit a four-year low, falling 3 percent below their January 2021 level. Its certified pre-owned program sales are estimated to have more than tripled year-on-year in 2024, reaching $300 million.
Meanwhile Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet remain up 22 percent and 28 percent, respectively, for the same period, but are at their lowest point in the past three-and-a-half years.
Cartier continued to be a bright spot for Richemont, despite a weaker fourth quarter. While its prices shrank 2.5 percent year-on-year, it performed best out of the Swiss watchmakers in the over-$3,000 category.
The report estimated the brand’s secondary market sales grew 18 percent year-on-year.
Meanwhile, its stablemates also saw a slight uptick in secondhand sales, attributed to a better value proposition stemming from falling resale prices.
Although it outperformed in the fourth quarter, LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton’s secondhand prices declined by 6.4 percent in 2024 across its watchmakers, who all fell more than 5 percent year-on-year. Hublot was the worst affected, while Tag Heuer, Bulgari and Zenith were in line with the market.
Swatch Group was the strongest performing group in 2024, with its entry-level brands posting positive performances, while Swatch was severely dragged down by the MoonSwatch, the report said.
For 2025, the report expects secondary prices will continue to fall, as the gap between retail and secondary market prices continues to widen. It names CPO programs as a possible solution for brands.
Primary market sales are also expected to contract in the first half of the year, with LVMH, Compagnie Financière Richemont and Swatch Group “likely continuing to underperform the market.”