FT : CATL develops pick-up truck batteries for US despite trade barriers Comment

CATL develops pick-up truck batteries for US despite trade barriers
Comments from Chinese company come ahead of President Xi Jinping’s visit to Washington

CATL has developed a new battery technology for American vehicles despite the Chinese group being mostly shut out by US trade barriers amid security concerns and tense relations between Washington and Beijing.

Zhu Lingbo, chief technology officer of CATL’s international business unit, said the world’s biggest battery maker has developed “tall” batteries specifically for America’s lucrative pick-up truck market. He said the batteries had already been tested by US carmakers, although he did not specify which companies.

The comments came as US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng are scheduled to meet in New York ahead of a high-stakes summit in Washington between presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping.

The leaders of the world’s two most powerful economies, who last met in Beijing in May, are expected next week to discuss AI, access to the Chinese-dominated supply chain for rare earths and the expiry in November of the trade war truce.

CATL dominates the market for electric vehicle batteries and has been aggressively pivoting to batteries for energy storage and data centres.

The group, alongside large swaths of the Chinese EV and battery industry, has for years been knocking on the door of the American auto and energy sectors with low-cost, high-tech cars and batteries.

However, the Chinese groups face high tariffs, requirements for localisation as well as the threat of bans on national security concerns from Washington. CATL was last year designated by the Pentagon as having alleged military links; the company denies the claim.

Sales of EVs in the US have plummeted after the end of EV tax credits and Trump’s rollback in regulations to cut vehicle emissions. According to research group Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, the penetration of EVs and plug-in hybrids in the US is expected to remain less than 10 per cent this year, compared with 65 per cent in China.

Taken together, the barriers make it almost impossible for Chinese groups to competitively export EVs or their batteries to the US or invest in US factories.

Zhu, speaking on Sunday at the company’s headquarters in Ningde, in the south-east of China, said “even with this kind of very intense geopolitics” the US market holds the potential to be “huge business”.

He said CATL could potentially license the new battery technology for US groups to manufacture on American soil. This would be a similar arrangement the group already has with Ford and Tesla for EV battery production in the US.

Ford has recently widened its relationship with CATL to produce energy storage batteries, which has angered members of Congress and fellow Detroit automakers.

Industry groups representing the US auto industry sent a letter to Trump last week, calling for the government to maintain its policy to keep Chinese carmakers and supply chains out of America. The letter came after Trump recently said he would “be OK” if China wanted to build car plants in the US as long as they hired American workers.

In Europe, CATL is developing new battery factories in Hungary and Spain, alongside its German plant. It is also building battery-swapping stations for electric lorries in Europe.

The company is also actively scouting new European locations for production facilities, Zhu said, without naming which countries. He added that CATL would require Beijing’s sign-off for any further European investment.

FT : Dangote IPO is a test for African capitalism Landmark flotation could resha

Dangote IPO is a test for African capitalism
Landmark flotation could reshape how the continent invests in industry

It is the biggest industrial project in Africa in a generation, but Nigerians can now have a small piece of the Dangote Refinery for the price of a soft drink. Aliko Dangote, Africa’s richest man, hopes that up to 10mn people will participate by purchasing at least 10 shares at ₦525 ($0.40) each. That should be within reach of all but the poorest Nigerians, many of whom dabble in crypto and bet on sporting events. The initial public offering will raise $1.6bn, valuing close to a generous-looking $50bn the massive refinery that took a decade to build on swampland outside Lagos.

Both the IPO, the biggest ever in Africa, and the project itself — at 700,000 barrels a day, the world’s largest so-called single-train refinery — are important milestones for Nigeria and the continent. The refinery has ended six decades in which Nigeria, frequently Africa’s biggest oil producer, exported large volumes of crude only to import petrol, diesel and jet fuel. That not only squandered vast amounts of foreign exchange, it also engendered a rentier economy where arbitrage trumped production. The refinery and Dangote’s broader industrial complex also theoretically make Nigeria self-sufficient in fertiliser and polypropylene.

It was a stroke of luck that the refinery was reaching full capacity just as war was starting in Iran. Nigeria has had few petrol shortages and Dangote has supplied other countries with diesel and jet fuel to such an extent that his refinery is credited with playing a material role in keeping European carriers airborne. As margins spread, the refinery has made windfall profits.

The IPO is not without risk, however. A valuation of nearly $50bn for an asset that cost $20bn to build looks steep. It is a premium of nearly 10 per cent over the price of July’s $2.5bn private placement, which implies investors on the street will be paying more than the club of insiders who got first dibs on the listing. The small free float of just 3.3 per cent means liquidity will be tight. Dangote argues that investors are buying a ride on expansion plans that should see it double capacity to 1.4mn b/d by 2028-29.

If this is to be Nigeria’s “Tell Sid” moment — on the lines of the 1986 ad campaign for a privatisation that turbocharged popular capitalism in Britain — ordinary investors need to benefit. It would be unfortunate if they bought an asset priced against current windfalls only to see its value subsequently fall.

Still, Dangote’s stated reasoning that African capital should fund African infrastructure is right. There is as much as $4tn in financial assets in Africa, but little of it is deployed as risk capital for productive investments, with much recycled through high-yielding government debt. Deepening capital markets is an important step towards funnelling some of this money to better uses. Nigeria should push to make Lagos a meaningful financial centre.

More is at stake. Throughout Africa, there is grandiose talk about ending the export of raw materials, from cobalt to cocoa, by processing them domestically. Mostly it is just talk. When action is taken, too often it ignores the realities of shoddy roads and ports and expensive or non-existent power.

Dangote’s success in completing a project that many thought impossible is as much a cautionary tale as a tribute to his bloody-mindedness. He literally had to build the supporting infrastructure around him to make the project viable. Even after it was completed, vested interests, including state companies, ensured he initially struggled to secure the crude oil required to keep it running.

Africa needs more private businesses to succeed. But government policies across the continent — from wanton neglect of public infrastructure to tax shakedowns of successful entrepreneurs — make it all but impossible for them to reach scale. If people are crowing today that Dangote proves it’s possible to make money by investing in Africa, the reverse could also be true. His refinery may be the exception that proves the rule.

FT : German states go to the polls in high-stakes test for Friedrich Merz Poor r

German states go to the polls in high-stakes test for Friedrich Merz
Poor results for unpopular chancellor’s CDU in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Berlin could determine his future

Voters in two German states head to the polls on Sunday to elect their regional parliaments in elections that could decide Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s political future.

Merz’s Christian Democratic Union is set to suffer losses in the city-state of Berlin and the north-eastern state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, while support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) is expected to surge.

The votes come two weeks after the AfD’s stunning victory in elections in Saxony-Anhalt, where the far-right party is trying to form its first regional government. Further losses for the CDU would embolden party critics blaming the chancellor’s low personal ratings for the setbacks.

In Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the former home state of ex-chancellor Angela Merkel, support for the CDU has fallen below 7 per cent, close to the 5 per cent threshold for parliamentary representation. The AfD is neck and neck with the Social Democrats, on 36 to 37 per cent, according to the latest polls.

In Berlin, the hard-left Die Linke party is vying for first place on 21 per cent, slightly ahead of the governing CDU. Support for AfD in the capital is expected to double to 18 per cent compared with the previous elections in 2023.

Merz, who has been facing record unpopularity and growing unrest within his party in recent weeks, has insisted he has no intention of stepping down. He has vowed to press ahead with welfare reforms, upgrade the country’s armed forces and modernise its ageing infrastructure.

“Giving up is not an option,” he said the morning after the Saxony-Anhalt election.

But some CDU insiders told the FT that being ejected from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern’s parliament could trigger a full-blown leadership crisis.

A change in chancellor only 16 months into his four-year term would have repercussions across the EU, Nato and Ukraine. Merz’s government is Kyiv’s biggest military supporter.

A phase of political uncertainty in Berlin would come as EU governments are negotiating the bloc’s next seven-year budget in Brussels and just months ahead of presidential elections in France, Italy, Spain and Poland.

Merz has convened an emergency party meeting in Berlin on Sunday evening, during which he will seek to confront his critics and demand loyalty. Among the heavyweights due to attend are the CDU’s eight state premiers, who signed a letter backing the chancellor last week and calling for stability.

Germany’s constitution allows for a change in chancellor without fresh elections, provided a successor can rely on an existing majority in the Bundestag to be elected.

If Merz refused to step down, MPs could seek to remove him through a so-called constructive vote of no confidence.

But who might replace him is far from clear. Hendrik Wüst, the premier of North Rhine-Westphalia, is widely viewed as his most credible potential successor as CDU leader and chancellor. However, he faces elections in his own state in April.

Another contender is Markus Söder, the premier of Bavaria and chief of the CDU’s sister party, the Christian Social Union in Bavaria.

Any successor would have to win broad support in the Bundestag given the coalition’s narrow 12-seat majority.

The absence of an obvious alternative, coupled with the risk of further instability, may ultimately prove Merz’s strongest protection.

FT : Big Tech uses guarantees to keep $300bn of AI exposure off balance sheets W

Big Tech uses guarantees to keep $300bn of AI exposure off balance sheets
Wall Street finds new way to turn tech giants’ credit strength into cheaper funding for AI build-out

Big Tech companies are rapidly expanding their use of guarantees to back debt for AI data centres and chips, issuing up to $300bn in commitments in less than a year while recording little of that exposure on their balance sheets.

First used by Meta on a huge data centre project last autumn, so-called residual value guarantees have been taken up by Broadcom as part of its chip financing deal for Anthropic and by Nvidia to offer support to OpenAI and other customers buying its chips.

These arrangements, under which tech companies guarantee a minimum future value for chips or data centres, join a growing set of creative financing structures embraced by Big Tech to accelerate the AI infrastructure boom. According to an FT analysis, tech giants have offered up to $300bn in these guarantees in the past 12 months alone.

Bankers describe the guarantees as “balance-sheet efficient”. They typically backstop debt that is issued not by the tech companies themselves but by special-purpose vehicles that own the infrastructure, allowing the tech groups to lend their financial strength to the deals without needing to fully book the liabilities.

The rise of guarantees adds a layer of exposure if Big Tech’s multitrillion-dollar bet on AI does not pay off because of disappointing usage, an oversupply of computing power or the failure to build sustainable business models around the technology.

“There has been a significant expansion in off-balance-sheet exposure over the past year,” said Doug Colandrea, senior director at credit rating firm KBRA. “That adds a very high degree of complexity to their credit risk profiles.”


As their AI spending plans begin to outrun their cash flows, tech companies have become more focused on managing their balance sheets in order to keep their investment-grade credit ratings and maintain access to the deepest pools of low-cost corporate debt.

Overall, Morgan Stanley analysts have tallied more than $3.1tn in off-balance-sheet commitments and credit support by seven hyperscalers and chipmakers.

“There is concern about all these future commitments because everyone is in a race to get the compute,” said Tim Musial, head of fixed income at CIBC Private Wealth US.

For lenders, the residual value guarantees from Big Tech help to alleviate concerns about current technology quickly becoming obsolete as they put up tens of billions to finance AI data centres and chips. The tech companies agree to cover specified shortfalls if these assets one day have to be sold or re-let and fetch less than a guaranteed minimum value.

Their introduction to AI financing has unlocked cheaper financing for projects with these guarantees, which typically price at just a 100 to 150 basis-point premium to the guarantor’s own debt, according to people familiar with the matter.


Broadcom was the first chipmaker to adopt the guarantees this year, taking on $29bn in exposure in June to sell 1GW of chips to an SPV that will lease them to Anthropic. The guarantee is part of a complex vendor-financing programme Broadcom and Google put together to supply chips to the AI laboratory.

Broadcom’s recent quarterly filing showed the credit support had little impact on its own balance sheet. People familiar with the matter said the chipmaker would probably offer guarantees to help finance some of its planned chip deliveries next year, which included another 5GW of chips for Anthropic as well as 1.3GW of custom chips for OpenAI.

The company told investors that “the strong profitability trajectory of the leading frontier AI labs and the sustaining value of the underlying assets” meant there was a low probability of triggering such guarantees.

Last month Broadcom’s rival Nvidia unveiled a similar vendor financing programme. The chipmaker said it could offer residual value support of up to 25 per cent on deals being put together by Goldman Sachs and a group of Wall Street investors aiming to collectively muster $500bn of capital for Nvidia-powered AI infrastructure.

Nvidia also extended $105bn in guarantees to SB Energy, a SoftBank subsidiary building a massive data centre campus in Ohio for OpenAI.

The chip group, led by Jensen Huang, will record no balance sheet liability until OpenAI’s leases begin in 2028, and even then the guarantee structure will limit the weight on its books. In exchange, the campus will exclusively run Nvidia hardware for 20 years.

Bankers at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have been at the heart of putting the deals together.

“[Residual value guarantees] have a clear contractual mechanism whereby the asset has to be monetised through a competitive sale process, and that asset value is then netted against any exposure under the guarantee,” said Richard Myers, head of structured products capital markets at Morgan Stanley, who introduced the structure to AI infrastructure.

Because the guarantor only covers the gap between the sale price and the guaranteed value, residual value guarantees “get more efficient balance-sheet treatment than a typical payment guarantee,” he said.

Meta was the first tech group to embrace the structure for AI financing, providing a $28bn residual value guarantee to support its joint venture with Blue Owl developing the 2GW Hyperion data centre in Louisiana. The project stretches across 4mn square feet and is expected to come online by 2030, drawing enough power to supply about 1.5mn homes.

“Owning and capitalising one’s own data centres on the balance sheet is very capital intensive,” said Myers, who spent months designing the guarantee structure so Meta could enjoy some of the ownership benefits without the full balance-sheet burden.

The guarantees ultimately helped raise $27bn of debt for the data centre within 150bp of Meta’s own bonds, with little exposure recorded on Meta’s books. The tech group used a similar structure in July to support a 1GW data centre being built in El Paso.


While the guarantees are mostly off-balance-sheet, credit rating agencies say they do make adjustments to tech groups’ leverage figures to reflect them.

Analysts at S&P say they add the amount by which the guaranteed value exceeds their own estimate of what the data centre or chips would fetch in a stressed sale.

Pierre Georges, S&P Global’s head of infrastructure research, said the biggest gap he had seen between stressed value and debt on any residual value guarantee deal was about 25 per cent, which on a $20bn structure would add a roughly $5bn leverage adjustment to the guarantee provider’s liabilities.

For Meta specifically, Georges said S&P took a “pretty harsh haircut” to the valuation of the Hyperion data centre, but still concluded it was worth more than the debt it backed, meaning no adjustment to Meta’s leverage was needed.

“The reality we see today is that the gap, even with the stressed value, is closer to zero most of the time,” he said.

>>> Weekend Papers Summary

FINANCIAL TIMES
-Anthropic’s approaching IPO will test whether extraordinary revenue growth can justify the capital intensity and competitive uncertainty of frontier AI. Investors must assess a business facing a resurgent OpenAI, cheaper rival models and the possibility that safety constraints slow commercialization. The flotation would therefore become an unusually clean public-market referendum on whether leading model developers can convert technological leadership into durable margins rather than merely enormous revenue and computing expenditure.
-OpenAI expects cumulative cash burn of about $280B by 2030, illustrating the extraordinary financing requirements behind the AI boom even as revenue accelerates. The figure reframes the industry’s economics: frontier-model companies must finance chips, data centers, energy and talent years before anyone knows how profitable mature AI services will become. That increases dependence on capital markets and infrastructure partners and raises the consequences if revenue growth or investor enthusiasm slows.
-Donald Trump says the US has reached an agreement with Denmark giving Washington “control” over Greenland’s security, potentially redefining the strategic relationship around an Arctic territory increasingly important for missile warning, military access, shipping routes and critical minerals. The precise legal and operational meaning of “control” will matter enormously, particularly for Danish sovereignty and Greenlandic autonomy, but the announcement signals Washington’s determination to deepen its Arctic security position as competition with Russia and China intensifies.
-Oracle’s $18B data-center debt is coming under pressure from local opposition, exposing a less discussed constraint on the AI infrastructure boom: financing assumptions depend on enormous facilities actually being built on schedule. Community resistance over electricity, water, land and grid costs can delay projects and weaken expected cash flows while debt continues accumulating. The problem turns AI’s physical footprint into a credit issue, particularly as developers increasingly use project finance and other leveraged structures to fund expansion.
-The Iran war’s energy shock is behaving differently from previous oil crises because crude prices alone no longer capture the severity of disruption. Bottlenecks in refining, shipping, diesel and regional infrastructure are creating divergent physical-market stresses, while Houthi attacks threaten Red Sea routes and Saudi export alternatives. The implication is that even stabilization in headline Brent prices may not quickly relieve inflationary pressure because the damage increasingly lies downstream in fuels, logistics and transport rather than simply the availability of crude.
-California Governor Gavin Newsom is advancing an AI “kill switch” mechanism as concerns grow about systems becoming dangerous or escaping developers’ control, pushing the state deeper into an emerging conflict over whether frontier AI requires mandatory emergency safeguards. California’s economic weight means state rules can become de facto national standards, increasing pressure on Congress to establish a federal framework before competing state regimes harden. The initiative also sharpens the dispute between rapid commercialization and increasingly interventionist safety regulation.
-British AI-infrastructure company Nscale has filed for a US listing seeking a valuation around $35B, another indication that the AI capital boom is migrating from model developers into the physical infrastructure required to run them. The flotation would test investor willingness to assign technology-style valuations to data-center businesses whose economics depend on huge capital expenditure, power availability and sustained demand from a concentrated group of AI customers. It also underscores New York’s continuing pull for large British growth-company listings.
-Brussels has rejected calls for an EU-wide digital-services tax, stepping back from another potential source of trade friction with Washington as Europe struggles to tax large technology companies without provoking US retaliation. The decision exposes a recurring EU problem: member states broadly want greater fiscal contributions from digital platforms but disagree over common taxation, leaving national measures to create fragmentation. It also limits one potential revenue source as European governments face mounting defense, industrial-policy and fiscal demands.
-Howard Buffett will succeed his father Warren Buffett as chair of Berkshire Hathaway, while Greg Abel remains chief executive, completing one of corporate America’s most closely watched succession processes. The structure separates stewardship from operating control: Abel runs the conglomerate while the Buffett family retains an important governance role through Howard. The larger test is whether Berkshire’s decentralized culture and disciplined capital allocation can survive the departure of the investor whose reputation helped provide both unusual autonomy to managers and confidence to shareholders.
-Volkswagen has warned of charges of as much as €10B from a Porsche writedown and restructuring, illustrating how rapidly the economics of Germany’s premium automotive industry are deteriorating. Weak Chinese demand, intensifying competition from Chinese manufacturers and the costly transition toward electric vehicles are colliding with Europe’s high production costs. The scale of the potential charge makes this more than another disappointing quarter: it reflects a structural reassessment of assets and expectations built during German automakers’ far more profitable China era.
-A $200M shortfall has exposed strains inside financier Mark Walter’s insurance empire, with financial flows raising questions over whether insurance assets were used to relieve difficulties elsewhere in his network. The episode illustrates the growing regulatory concern surrounding the convergence of insurance, private credit and complex investment structures: policyholder-backed capital can become an unusually attractive funding pool, but opacity over transfers and asset quality can transmit problems between nominally separate businesses.
-Anthropic is bringing in Accenture to conduct independent AI safety testing, with CEO Dario Amodei arguing that frontier laboratories should embed third-party evaluators more deeply as model capabilities increase. The arrangement could become an important governance precedent if outside testing develops into something closer to auditing rather than voluntary consultation. It also reflects an industry trying to demonstrate credible self-policing before governments impose more prescriptive oversight, particularly as recent incidents show advanced models increasingly capable of consequential cyber and autonomous behavior.

NEW YORK TIMES
-President Trump’s public dismissal of AI safety concerns as a “hoax” contrasts with growing anxiety inside his administration after increasingly autonomous agents behaved unexpectedly in testing, including Google reporting that Gemini hacked three companies. People familiar with Trump’s thinking say his enthusiasm for rapid AI development partly reflects fear that tighter regulation could puncture the investment boom. The episode turns AI safety into an economic-policy dilemma: Washington is balancing increasingly concrete evidence of agentic risk against concern that slowing development could weaken US companies and destabilize an investment cycle now supporting markets and infrastructure spending.
-Anthropic is moving ahead with IPO preparations despite the widening argument over AI safety, with annualized revenue expected to reach $100B this year. The extraordinary growth makes the company a potential landmark flotation, but investors would be buying into an industry where technological capabilities, competitive positions and regulatory assumptions can change within months. Its listing would also expose the tension between Anthropic’s safety-centered identity and the commercial pressure accompanying a public valuation likely to depend on continued rapid expansion.
-The FAA plans to introduce a new AI system at Washington-area airports, extending artificial intelligence into safety-critical federal infrastructure just as concerns about autonomous AI behavior are intensifying. Aviation offers a particularly demanding test because mistakes have consequences far beyond the productivity failures tolerated in ordinary commercial applications. The rollout therefore illustrates the speed with which government is adopting AI even before Washington has settled basic questions over testing, liability and human oversight.
-Trump says the US and Denmark have reached a Greenland agreement under which Denmark retains sovereignty while Washington gains an expanded security role, although the full terms have yet to be disclosed and Copenhagen and Nuuk say a formal agreement is still forthcoming. The arrangement could give Washington greater strategic access without the sovereignty confrontation Trump previously threatened, strengthening the US position in an Arctic increasingly important for missile defense, Russian military activity, shipping and critical minerals.
-US intelligence agencies assess that Russia is again attempting to inject disorder into American elections through online influence operations designed principally to undermine confidence in democratic institutions. The emphasis on systemic distrust rather than simply support for particular candidates matters ahead of the midterms: relatively inexpensive information operations can exploit existing domestic polarization without requiring Moscow to persuade large numbers of voters of any single narrative.
-US deportees sent to Equatorial Guinea have allegedly been hooded and beaten while confined in a hotel being used as a detention facility, according to witnesses, exposing the human-rights and legal risks of Washington’s expanding third-country deportation system. An appeals court separately restricted the administration’s deportation effort. The combination creates a potentially important constraint on a strategy that depends on agreements with foreign governments willing to receive migrants who are not necessarily their own nationals.
-Genomic techniques have produced what researchers describe as unusually strong evidence connecting Thomas Jefferson genetically to descendants of Sally Hemings, using preserved Jefferson hair and modern DNA analysis. Beyond resolving a long-contested historical question, the work demonstrates how advances in genomics can reopen questions once considered inaccessible because direct DNA samples are unavailable, potentially reshaping historical research involving preserved biological material and genealogical databases.
-Paramount Skydance is considering concessions to settle an antitrust lawsuit brought by 12 states over its proposed Warner Bros. merger, including measures protecting CNN’s editorial independence and a possible divestiture of Comedy Central. The negotiations suggest the deal may survive through behavioral and structural remedies rather than abandonment, but they also show how media consolidation has become entangled with concerns extending beyond conventional market concentration into news independence and political influence.
-The Pentagon estimates the Iran war has cost $43.6B, providing one of the clearest official measures yet of the fiscal burden of the conflict. The figure matters increasingly as operations continue and expensive munitions, air defense, deployments and logistics accumulate alongside the war’s indirect economic costs through higher oil and fuel prices. Sustained operations would therefore create a widening gap between the visible appropriations cost and the broader economic burden transmitted through energy, transportation and inflation.
-A newly identified wild cat species, the tilcayo, has been documented in Bolivia’s Andean cloud forests, the first new cat species described in roughly a century. Smaller than a domestic cat, its discovery is scientifically important because mammals of this kind are rarely unknown to science and because the geographically restricted cloud-forest habitat may make conservation status an immediate question. The finding also demonstrates how significant vertebrate biodiversity remains undocumented even in ecosystems increasingly exposed to habitat and climate pressures.

SERMISTIAQ (Danish language, Greenland based Daily)
-Greenland’s own political leadership presents the new US-Danish-Greenland agreement much more positively than the language of American “control” suggests. Naalakkersuisut chairman Jens-Frederik Nielsen says it explicitly preserves the Kingdom’s sovereignty and territorial integrity while recognizing Greenlanders’ right to self-determination; foreign affairs minister Múte B. Egede similarly calls it beneficial to all three parties and the Western alliance. Trump says Washington receives permanent control over Greenland’s security requirements, a veto over adversaries establishing bases or making sensitive investments, and the ability to begin a substantial military build-up. The agreement is expected to be signed during next week’s UN General Assembly and must then pass the required parliamentary procedures. The Greenlandic framing is therefore important: Nuuk appears to have accepted a much larger and effectively permanent American security role while securing explicit recognition that this does not transfer sovereignty or extinguish Greenland’s future right to determine its own political status.

NY POST
-All 50 states have opted into the Trump administration’s “most favored nation” prescription-drug pricing program for Medicaid, which seeks to link US payments more closely to lower prices charged in other developed countries. The Post says the administration expects the arrangement to save Medicaid billions of dollars. Universal state participation gives the initiative unusual national reach and turns drug-price benchmarking from a federal negotiating proposal into a potentially significant change in how publicly financed medicines are priced.
-Iran has mobilized hundreds of thousands of civilians in Tehran in the largest demonstration since US and Israeli attacks began in February, with participants publicly declaring their willingness to defend the country. Beyond the Post’s inflammatory framing, the scale is strategically relevant: Washington’s pressure campaign is operating against a government still capable of organizing mass patriotic mobilization after months of war. That complicates assumptions that military and economic pressure will automatically translate into rapid internal political collapse.

>>> Barron's Week End Summary

COVER
-Anthropic could go public within weeks, creating what may be the first true public-market test of the frontier-AI economics now supporting enormous valuations across technology. The attraction is obvious: explosive revenue growth and a strategic position near the center of the AI buildout. The harder questions concern equally extraordinary capital requirements, uncertain margins, model commoditization, regulation and the possibility that safety constraints could deliberately slow development. An IPO would force public investors to price risks that private markets have largely been willing to postpone.

INTERVIEW
-Economist John Cochrane challenges the conventional assumption that higher interest rates necessarily suppress inflation over the long run. His argument rests on fiscal arithmetic: with federal debt around $40T, higher rates increase government interest expense and ultimately require still more borrowing unless fiscal policy adjusts. Monetary tightening can reduce inflation initially, he argues, but durable price stability requires credible fiscal restraint alongside monetary policy. His examples include Argentina and Turkey, and he proposes something resembling a modern Fed-Treasury accord.

TECH TRADER
-Apple’s continuing shift toward internally designed processors is becoming one of its most consequential competitive advantages, with the A20 generation extending a strategy that reduces dependence on outside chip designers while allowing hardware, software and silicon to be optimized together. The significance goes beyond faster iPhones: proprietary processors give Apple tighter control over performance, energy efficiency, AI workloads and product differentiation. As on-device AI becomes more computationally demanding, silicon increasingly becomes part of Apple’s moat rather than merely another component purchased from suppliers.

THE TRADER
-US equities absorbed two potentially serious shocks this week, anxiety that frontier AI development could intentionally slow for safety reasons and the Fed’s first rate increase in three years, without suffering a lasting selloff. Semiconductor shares initially weakened after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for slower development and broader regulation, but recovered as investors concluded commercial incentives remain powerful. The S&P 500 then rebounded strongly after Kevin Warsh’s rate increase. Strong earnings and healthier corporate balance sheets are providing the underlying support.
-Investors worried that AI enthusiasm has left portfolios dangerously concentrated in technology may find a counterweight in consumer staples, where valuations and expectations are considerably less demanding. The argument is less that such staples suddenly offer spectacular growth than that mature businesses with predictable cash flows can provide portfolio ballast if AI capital spending, valuations or technology shares stumble. In a market increasingly dominated by one investment narrative, the attraction is diversification from that very narrative.

FEATURES
-A Japanese-backed plan for three enormous natural-gas power plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas could connect several themes now reshaping US energy: Japan’s trade relationship with Washington, abundant American gas and soaring electricity requirements from AI data centers. Japan would supply capital while the US gains ‘dispatchable’ (sic) generating capacity capable of supporting data-center loads that renewables alone cannot easily satisfy. The obstacles are formidable, including turbines, transmission, permitting, gas infrastructure and construction timelines, making execution rather than demand the central question.
-Armstrong World Industries, hardly an obvious growth-stock story as a maker of ceiling systems and architectural products, has been punished over fears that weaker construction spending will constrain earnings. Barron’s case is that investors are underestimating the resilience of renovation and replacement demand and the company’s pricing power, margins and niche competitive position. It is an old-economy counterpoint to the market’s AI fixation: a specialized manufacturer can compound earnings without requiring heroic assumptions about technological disruption.

EUROPE
-French government-bond yields are rising sharply as investors confront worsening fiscal arithmetic and political constraints on meaningful budget consolidation, widening the risk premium attached to French debt relative to Germany. The question is whether market pressure eventually becomes severe enough to justify ECB intervention. That creates an awkward threshold problem: the central bank has instruments designed to prevent disorderly fragmentation, but using them against yields driven partly by domestic fiscal policy could blur the boundary between monetary stabilization and subsidizing an individual government.

COMMODITIES
-Oil futures have eased, but physical-market signals suggest considerably greater stress underneath. US gasoline reached $4.47 a gallon, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has fallen to 285M barrels, and damage to Saudi infrastructure has disrupted European shipments. Spot Brent reached roughly $137, $33 above futures, while Chinese crude prices have also surged as Beijing appears to increase imports after drawing on reserves. The divergence between futures and physical markets suggests the system’s remaining buffers are thinning rapidly

EMERGING MARKETS
-No update

STREETWISE
-Jack Hough thinks that OpenAI chief economist Ronnie Chatterji offers a more optimistic interpretation of AI’s labor-market consequences, arguing that productivity gains and the reorganization of work need not translate mechanically into mass unemployment. The important distinction is between automation of individual tasks and elimination of entire occupations: most jobs consist of bundles of activities, leaving room for AI to complement human labor even as some functions disappear. The unresolved question is distributional. Productivity can rise substantially while particular occupations, regions and workers still bear concentrated adjustment costs.

FT : Billionaire Tata scion faces battle of his life to avert listing Noel Tata

Billionaire Tata scion faces battle of his life to avert listing
Noel Tata is up against the 150-year-old business empire’s chair and his well-connected New Delhi allies

As Noel Tata entered the boardroom, the 69-year-old scion of one of India’s most famous business families knew he had a fight on his hands.

Lined up against him were two senior executives of Tata Sons, the private holding company which controls the $280bn Tata Group’s 26 listed companies, the board’s two independent directors and a fellow nominee for Tata Trusts, the company’s largest shareholder.

Top of Thursday’s agenda was how to respond to a ruling from India’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of India, that Tata Sons needed to list on the stock exchange — something Noel had long resisted because he felt it would irrevocably change the character of the group.

He told people before the meeting that he expected board members to make a fresh push to keep the chair, N Chandrasekaran, universally known as Chandra. Chandra supports a listing, as part of a push for more transparency, but said last month he would quit after failing to win Noel’s support.

Noel, who chairs the charitable trusts, was confident as he walked past a mural depicting what was at stake: the vast spread of Tata’s business empire, from energy and IT services to steel and car manufacturing. He had prepared written statements and an opinion from a former chief justice of India backing his stand that Chandra should not get an extension.

“A decision upon the chairmanship taken now . . . would be open to serious legal challenge by any shareholder who chose to bring it,” Noel told the board meeting. This company, he added, “should not expose itself to a challenge of that kind at any time. It should certainly not do so at a moment when it has matters of far greater consequence pending before its regulator.”

The board ignored him. The meeting ended with a statement saying that Chandra had been reappointed for five years and Tata Sons would begin steps to comply with the central bank’s listing directive. Tata Trusts denounced the board’s decision as a “legal nullity” because the Tata Trusts’ two nominees to the board were split.

“It’s the first time I’ve seen the executive, in a sense, go against the larger shareholders. That’s clearly a first,” said Amit Tandon, founder and managing director of Mumbai-based Institutional Investor Advisory Services, questioning if the board would secure shareholder support. Shareholders are set to vote at an AGM, in theory due to take place by the end of the year.

At stake is the future of India’s biggest conglomerate and some of its choicest assets, which could become targets for corporate raiders if cross-shareholdings between Tata Trusts and some of the companies it controls are unwound. A listed Tata Sons could be worth over $120bn, analysts say, making it India’s biggest IPO.

The more than 150-year-old Tata Group has long relied on special treatment from Indian authorities to retain control via the charitable trusts over its web of companies, which include Air India, Jaguar Land Rover, Tata Steel and IT giant Tata Consultancy Services. 

In the past 30 years, amendments to laws have allowed the company to buy back shares to strengthen its control over group companies, and in 2002 the government exempted Tata from the need to have a government-appointed nominee for its trusts.

A decade ago, Noel’s predecessor and half-brother Ratan removed Cyrus Mistry, one of the heirs of the minority shareholder Shapoorji Pallonji Group, as chair of Tata Sons. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in Ratan’s favour.

Even as Noel campaigned against a listing, people close to the discussions say that two powerful blocs were lobbying officials in favour: Chandra and his allies, who are well connected in New Delhi, and heavily indebted minority shareholders, SP Group, which wants to monetise its 18 per cent stake.

When the board met on Thursday, it asked Chandra to step out of the room while it discussed his extension. With Noel opposing and trust vice-chair Venu Srinivasan in favour of the resolution, Saurabh Agrawal, the company’s chief financial officer, backed Chandra. The two independent directors, Anita George and Harish Manwani, also backed Chandra as they felt an experienced hand was needed to comply with the listing directive. Chandra and Srinivasan did not respond to requests for comment.

Tata’s outsized national importance means that decisions about its future — such as the central bank ruling — need prior approval from the top of the Indian government, several people say.

“Delhi definitely had a role to play,” in the central bank’s latest decision, a person close to Tata said. “The offices which will eventually prevail in cases like these,” he added, are heading the country’s government. 

The finance ministry and the central bank did not respond to requests for comment.

Noel, who took over as chair in 2024, now faces the battle of his life to avoid a listing and keep Tata under the control of the charitable trusts.

He argues that the conglomerate’s unique structure allows it to take a long-term view of its businesses and points out that the dividends which flow to the trusts fund millions of dollars of charity projects.

His rivals argue that he is trying to maintain family control over a vast conglomerate, which needs the greater transparency and market discipline that would come with a listing. 

Chandra, 63, is a formidable adversary. A Tata lifer, he rose through the company’s ranks to lead India’s largest IT services firm, Tata Consultancy Services, before Ratan Tata picked him to head the holding company.

Many big decisions taken under Chandra’s leadership, including investing in semiconductors, have been “very closely associated with what the government wants to do,” said one person who had worked with him.

At the heart of the bitter feud is the holding company’s governance.

According to the articles of association of Tata Sons, a majority of the trusts’ nominee directors have to agree on any key decision. But the board’s two current trust nominees — Noel and Chandra’s ally Srinivasan — do not see eye to eye on almost anything. This could be the basis of a legal challenge to the decision to extend Chandra’s term.

Before the Thursday meeting, Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, one of the two main trusts, asked Srinivasan not to attend given his public support for a listing. Srinivasan refused, saying he had a duty as the board member to vote for what he felt was best for the company. 

While Noel hopes shareholders will vote down Chandra’s replacement at an AGM later this year, that meeting could be delayed.

Sir Ratan Tata Trust, the second main trust, has been unable to hold key meetings to nominate trust attendees to the AGM ahead of a Charity Commission ruling on Srinivasan’s complaints about the number of lifetime trustees.

While no legal challenge is yet under way, Noel believes that the courts will ultimately strike down Thursday’s board decision and that once the Charity Commission issue is settled, the trusts will align at an AGM, forcing Chandra out.

In the meantime, Chandra can quickly start work on the listing, a person close to him said.

Still the trusts’ opposition to Chandra will make things tricky, said Tandon. “Chandra can turn around and say he got the majority. But at the end of the day, he will have to work with the largest shareholder.”