NYT : Government Rests Case Against Ex-SAC Trader

Government Rests Case Against Ex-SAC Trader

Michael S. Steinberg, right, a former fund manager at SAC Capital Advisors, with his lead lawyer, Barry H. Berke.
After three weeks and 13 witnesses, the government on Friday rested its insider trading case against Michael S. Steinberg, a former fund manager at SAC Capital Advisors.

The defense’s case will take considerably less time. It said it might call one witness on Monday, and then both sides will present their closing arguments. Mr. Steinberg will not take the witness stand.

Seated in the Federal District Court in Lower Manhattan, a jury of nine women and three men have been presented with hundreds of emails, phone records and trading records by the prosecution, often enduring hours of Wall Street jargon.

The prosecution, led by Antonia M. Apps, an assistant United States attorney, has accused Mr. Steinberg of trading the stocks of the technology companies Dell and Nvidia after receiving confidential information about their earnings from Jon Horvath, a former technology analyst at SAC.

They sought to establish that, under pressure from Mr. Steinberg to supply “edgy proprietary information,” Mr. Horvath turned to a network of analysts that shared nonpublic information.

“My edge is contacts at the company and their distribution channel,” Mr. Horvath wrote in an October 2007 email to an account used to send trading ideas to Steven A. Cohen, the founder of SAC.

Later in the email chain, Mr. Steinberg wrote: “I suspect the line about contacts at the company may wake up our legal eagles,” adding, “fortunately, to my knowledge, the guys don’t actually work there anymore.”

The jury listened to hours of testimony from SAC employees that pulled back the curtain on the secretive world of SAC. They also heard from witnesses who have pleaded guilty in unrelated insider trading cases and employees from Dell and Nvidia.

The government rested its case after Salvatore Cincinelli, an F.B.I. agent working in the securities and fraud division, talked jurors through the records of Mr. Steinberg’s trades in Dell and Nvidia stocks, as well as the trading records of managers at other hedge funds who were receiving the same information from Mr. Horvath’s network.

The jurors were alert and engaged as Mr. Steinberg’s lead lawyer, Barry H. Berke, began his cross-examination, lobbing a quick succession of questions at Mr. Cincinelli, flipping through the charts the prosecution presented, asking about a figure in one chart before jumping to another chart and figure.

“What I’m trying to do is keep this simple,” Mr. Berke told Mr. Cincinelli as he questioned the validity of Mr. Cincinelli’s method of presenting the trading information on which Mr. Steinberg’s guilt or innocence may hinge.

At times Mr. Cincinelli was unable to follow, replying “I don’t recall.” Judge Richard J. Sullivan also interjected at one point to say he didn’t understand a question asked by Mr. Berke.

Jurors were also given one last glimpse into the world of insider trading when Hyung Lim took the witness stand. Mr. Lim, who worked at Altera Corporation and Broadcom, has pleaded guilty to insider trading charges. He admitted to providing his friend Danny Kuo, another analyst in Mr. Horvath’s information network who was employed at Whittier Trust, with nonpublic information about Nvidia.

When asked why he supplied information to Mr. Kuo even though he knew it was illegal, Mr. Lim replied, “It was easy information for me to get.”

“Danny was a friend; he wanted help, so I just gave it to him,” he added. Mr. Lim said he and Mr. Kuo played poker together.

Mr. Berke’s performance was strongest during his seven-day cross-examination of Mr. Horvath. He has argued that Mr. Steinberg did not know the information he received from Mr. Horvath was obtained illegally.

The defense team has tried to discredit Mr. Horvath, who pleaded guilty to insider trading charges in September 2012 and agreed to help prosecutors in the investigation of Mr. Steinberg.

Mr. Steinberg’s trial strikes at the core of a decade-long investigation of SAC by the government. The trial began on Nov. 20, two weeks after SAC agreed to pay $1.2 billion and plead guilty to five counts of insider trading violations. Of the eight SAC employees to be charged criminally, six have pleaded guilty to securities fraud in what the government has called a “systematic” insider trading scheme.

>>> What to look at this Week End - Part 1 ( Saturday 14/12 )

US Market closed slightly postive, but still negative on the month, S&P-1,7% and Russel 2000 -3,1%, volume still light with 627mil shares traded...VIX @ 15,77 +1,48%...highest level since mid October...see demand for protection ahead fo next week FED meeting

- Chinese spacecraft landed on the moon,
- Germany's SPD backs coalition with Merkel's CDU
- German Union Rejects EU Stance on Merkel Energy Policy: Bild
- Italy’s Deficit Very Close to 3% of GDP This Year: Saccomanni

Keep an eye on :
- ALO FP : Alstom rejects Siemens as partner for Transport division; TMH (Russian) still a possibility - Challenges
- BMW GY : BMW North America Recalls 76,000 Cars Over Air Bag Defect: NHTSA
- BOL FP : Bollore Awarded London Electric Car Charging Contract: Parisien
- DTE GY / TMUS US : Sprint Working Toward Bid for T-Mobile US, Dow Jones Says
- EAD FP : EADS’s Astrium Unit Wins Order for 18 Ariane 5 ECA Rockets
- GE US : raised dvd by 16% (payable 27/01), annual outlook meeting next week, big focus on manufacturing M&A.
- JNJ US : J&J Said to Get 3 Diagnostics Bids of at Least $4 Billion Each
- KCO GY : Kloeckner Considering Acquisitions, to focus on North America because of low energy cost, could shut down unprofitable business, Co coould return to profitability in 2014, could allow to pay dvd again in 2014, CEO Ruehl Tells Welt
- MB IM : Generali Cuts Mediobanca Stake Below 2%, Consob Says
- ML FP : Michelin North America Recalling as Many as 1.2m Tires: NHTSA
- MONC IM : Moncler Combined IPO Offering About 27 Times (97mil shares demand) Oversubscribed ( Retail 14 times) - start trading on Monday, priced @ E10,20/share--> value the Co @ 2.55bil Euros (cuccinelli oversub. 17 times)
- ORC FP : Orco Property’s Hungarian Units Start Insolvency Proceedings
- PVA SM : Pescanova Investors Propose 90% Debt Write-Off, Cinco Dias Says
- Red Bull : Red Bull Granted License in China, Plans Drink Sales, Krone Says
- RSA LN : Zurich Ins. Or Allianz could be interested in all or part of RSA - FT
- Taittinger : Taittinger preparing for acquisitions the French champagne house owned by banking group Credit Agricole and the Taittinger family, is interested in acquiring winemakers operating in the Burgundy and Bordeaux regions.
- TIT IM : Telefonica CEO Alierta Steps Down From Telecom Italia’s Board
- TKA AV : New Austria Govt Aims to Sell Company Stakes, Austria’s three big listed company stakes are: 53% of Austrian Post,28% of Telekom Austria, 32% of OMV
- VIE FP : Veolia French Water Unit Chief Sees EU150m of Additional Revenue
- VOS GY : Vossloh May Cut Dividend Again, CEO Andree Tells Boersen-Zeitung

(Barron's) Time to Brace for a 20% Correction

Time to Brace for a 20% Correction

Ned Davis Research expects a 2014 buying opportunity. How to play the decline-and-recovery scenario.

Ned Davis Research is well-known on Wall Street, even though it's based almost 1,200 miles away, in Venice, Fla. That's because, over the past 33 years, it has built a reputation for incisive technical analysis, delivered clearly. It's been particularly good at anticipating turns in the market, and it sees trouble approaching, despite the general bullishness among investment pros about 2014. (See the Cover Story for other views.)

On a curiously balmy December day, even for the Sunshine State, Barron's last week visited the company's founder, Ned Davis, along with Timothy Hayes, its chief global investment strategist, and Lance Stonecypher, its chief U.S. equity sector strategist. They had a lot to say.

Barron's: You've warned that a correction is near. Why?

Davis: Right now, about 78% of industry groups are in healthy uptrends. That would have to fall to about 60% for us to say the market had lost upside momentum. We also focus on the Federal Reserve, and it's still in a very easy mode, despite all the talk about tapering. So, those two indicators are bullish. However, we've looked at all the bear markets since 1956 and found seven associated with an inverted yield curve [in which short-term interest rates are higher than long ones] -- a classic sign of Fed tightening. Those declines lasted well over a year and took the market down 34%, on average. Several other bear markets took place without an inverted yield curve, and the average loss there was about 19% in 143 market days. We don't see an inverted yield curve anytime soon. So, whatever correction we get next year is more likely to be in the 20% range.

That's great news, I guess, at least compared with Armageddon.

Davis: We also looked at midterm-election years -- the second year of a presidential term, like the one coming up in 2014 -- going back to 1934, and the average decline in those years was 21%. But after the low was hit in those years, the market, on average, gained 60% over two years. So, a correction should be followed by a great buying opportunity.

Lance, one of your reports indicates that, as the market reaches its peak, there are three stages for investors to ponder, and we're near stage one now.

Stonecypher: We reached our conclusions after averaging all the one-year seasonal market cycles, the four-year midterm-election cycle Ned mentioned, and a 10-year cycle. The timing of the stages can be tricky. But based on the average pattern, this stage should run from the beginning of the year into April or so. In this first stage, the equity sectors to be in are usually high beta. Our top three sectors for this stage are industrials, consumer discretionary, and health care.

However, I have industrials on a short leash because the 50% bonus-depreciation for equipment might expire this year, hurting them. If that happens, we'd mark them down from Overweight to something more neutral. Also, the correlations among stocks today are at their lowest since 2007. So the leadership might not play out exactly as history says it will. That's good news for stockpickers, who now can make judgments on stocks on [individual merits, rather than the outlook for their sector or the market].

[image]
Alex Stafford for Barron's
Ned Davis, center, flanked by Timothy Hayes, left, and Lance Stonecypher
Why have correlations broken down?

Stonecypher: Correlations rise during bear markets or when there's a lot of macro risk, as there was during the sovereign-debt crisis. Correlations peaked in 2011 and have been declining ever since.

What about stage two, which your research indicates might run until October or so of 2014?

Stonecypher: Well, when you have a bear market, the leadership becomes very defensive, so you want low-beta stocks: utilities, staples, health care, energy. These all tend to pay higher dividends.

Which helps offset any price hits your stocks take. What about stage three?

Stonecypher: That's pretty much the inverse of stage two. You want to load your portfolio up with high-beta stocks again: things like financials, technology, industrials, consumer discretionary, and materials. That's history's view. We also watch momentum -- just simply the rate of change in stock prices, an indicator that has been working well for the past year or so. The problem is that price momentum works great when you are in an environment of low correlations among stocks. Unfortunately, at major market turning points, especially when you go from a bear market to a bull market, the momentum factor needs to be inverted. It's less problematic going from stage one to stage two, but it is very problematic going from stage two to stage three. If the correction we expect is mild, I probably won't reduce the weighting of my momentum readings very much. But I will, if we do have a 15%, 20% decline. A lot of times that is where following momentum will give you drawdowns.

Drawdowns? Are those what most people would call losses?

Stonecypher: Yes. You could get big losses.

Tim, what about the global outlook?

Hayes: I wanted to see how the four-year cycle applies to markets around the world. So we looked at all the components in the All Country World Index and discovered that from the beginning of the summer on June 21 to the end of the summer on Sept. 22, the market tends to drop. It fits in with the old "sell in May and go away." This trend tends to be much stronger in the second year of the four-year cycle. This supports the idea that whatever kind of correction we're going to have will be pretty global.

And money has been pouring into global funds, right?

Hayes: The 13-week moving average of flows into U.S. and international mutual funds and exchange-traded funds has gotten to $9.5 billion, the highest we've seen. In fact, international funds are having more consistent inflows.
Davis: This is comparable to 2000, the biggest difference being that, back then, almost all the buying was concentrated in U.S. funds, and now it is pretty well split right down the middle. And, also like in 2000, bond funds are showing big outflows.
Hayes: So we are seeing really a big shift in asset allocation. Anyway, here's where valuations come into play: Markets will start to look expensive early next year. And you're not going to see the U.S. fall 20% and the rest of the world keep going up. Any decline will be a global decline, although some markets will dip more than others.

Based on price/earnings ratios alone, China and Korea are pretty cheap, and they still look good when you factor in expected interest rates and economic growth. One question we've been asking is, What happens if rates move up? Is this a problem for a particular market at 0.5%, 5%, or what? One way to look at this is to compare the earnings yield [earnings per share divided by a stock's price] against interest rates. In the 1990s, earnings yields were below bond yields, yet the market kept going up. Why? Because growth was good and, as a result, the market's earnings expectations were, too. So, for a time, the market could support higher valuations…until it all ended with the bubble of 2000. Going forward, a big question will be, Are rates at levels that will impede growth?

Along with China and Korea, you put Israel at the top of your favorite places to invest, and Ireland, Italy, and Portugal at the bottom.

Hayes: If you look at Europe just off the basis of P/E valuations, you might make a bullish case for a lot of its markets. But when you also consider the growth and interest-rate outlooks, you see that in some peripheral markets not all their risks are off the table.

Rotate and Prosper

In the first and third stages of the decline-and-recovery scenario Ned Davis Research foresees, relatively high-beta stocks, such as consumer-discretionary issues, would be the top bets. In the second stage, low-beta sectors, such as health care, would do best.

S&P 500 Sector Recommendation 36-Mo Beta
Industrials Overweight 1.16
Consumer Discretionary Overweight 0.97
Health Care Overweight 0.75
Materials Marketweight 1.38
Consumer Staples Marketweight 0.50
Financials Marketweight 1.42
Information Technology Marketweight 0.99
Energy Underweight 1.37
Telecommunication Services Underweight 0.31
Utilities Underweight 0.25
Source: Ned Davis Research
In contrast, in China and Korea, which have gone through several tough years since 2010, the true valuations look much better. People were worried that China would have a hard landing, but the Chinese engineered the kind of soft landing they wanted. The new government has come up with a formal growth plan, and the market seems to be reacting well to it, so investments are starting to show up there in a bigger way, especially with China's economic numbers coming through. Overall, Asian emerging markets look much better than Latin America's or Europe's.

Ned, let's get back to the U.S. for a minute. Some investors argue that the markets are setting up as they did after 1982, leading up to the 1987 fiasco. Is there a possibility of another Black Monday?

Davis: This is an interesting period. Interest rates are zero, so stocks look good, relative to other assets. But on an absolute basis, they're not really so cheap. In 2007, some people said, yeah, stocks may be a little overvalued, but not relative to houses. Houses are way overvalued, so money will flow from houses to stocks. But stocks went down more than houses. Relative valuation is tricky. I trust absolute valuation more, and I'm hoping that, if we get a decline next year, it will make absolute values look better, while relative values will stay good. That would set up the buying opportunity we're looking for. If the Fed does taper its bond-buying next year and rates go up, say, to 3.25% or 3.5% on 10-year notes, that may be enough tightening to create the correction we see coming. A lot of value players, even Warren Buffett, say they're not seeing a lot of great values. Those are absolute values they're talking about, and that's a problem a correction would solve.

What about the economy itself in 2014?

Davis: We've had a very slow-growth economy, barely above stall speed. But our forward-looking indicators have gotten a lot better; you could see a 2.5% to 3% growth rate for gross domestic product. There also could be some wage pressure; we think the labor markets are a little tighter than the Fed thinks. Average hourly earnings have been moving up 1.55%, on a year-to-year basis. The rate is 2.03% now. If you look at the long-term picture of wages and inflation, they could hit 2.5%, and 2.5% is the Fed's danger level. To me, a 3.25% T-note yield and 2.5% wage inflation put the Fed on the defensive. I don't know how much of this bull market is Fed-driven, although I suspect quite a bit of it is. So, I'd really watch the T-note yield and wage inflation.
Stonecypher: Some studies we did might shed some light on how supportive the Fed has been to this market. The market had a waterfall decline -- a 20% drop -- in 2011, and I'd done studies to see how long it typically takes to recover in a postwaterfall period. In this case, the market returned to its highs by February 2012, in one of the fastest postwaterfall recoveries on record. I attribute a lot of that to QE 3 [the Fed's third bout of quantitative easing].
Davis: That 20% drop in 2011 points to what we're looking for next year. But let's back up for a minute. Before, we were talking about how strong fund inflows have been. People aren't as stupid as Wall Street makes them out to be. You don't want to see extremes, but if you're an equity investor, you want to see money flow into equity funds and you want to see it come out of bond funds. A year ago, almost to the day, Tim put out a major report suggesting that a secular change in asset allocation was occurring, away from bonds and into stocks. And this probably has been the best year ever for stocks versus bonds. I'm giving him a shout-out.

He'd probably prefer a raise.

Davis: This is going to be an ongoing theme. So, while people who are rushing into stock funds might be buying wrong short term -- meaning next year -- that doesn't necessarily mean they will be wrong long term.

If we do get a 20% decline, and the market begins rallying after that, how much of a pop could we get?

Hayes: Well, it's really a big guess, but you'd probably end 2014 up slightly from where you started. Then, double-digit returns would be normal.

Double-digit returns for a couple of years?

Hayes: That would be normal.

Most investors would happily take that. Thanks.

(Barron's) Bullish on 2014, Wall Street strategists expect stocks to rise 10%,

Bullish on 2014

Wall Street strategists expect stocks to rise 10%, boosted by a stronger economy and fatter corporate profits. Bullish on tech, industrials.

Following six years of manic performance, Wall Street's top strategists see a sense of normalcy returning to the financial markets next year. They expect the Federal Reserve to sharply reduce its $85 billion monthly bond-buying program, allowing interest rates to edge higher. And they see stocks rising about 10% on the basis of corporate fundamentals, instead of being whipsawed by every utterance from the Fed.

After a year in which the Dow has advanced 20% and the S&P 25%—far more than almost anyone had predicted—more muted gains might seem boring. But boring could be just the ticket to inspire renewed confidence among investors in the markets and the financial system.

THE 10 STRATEGISTS Barron's consulted about the outlook for 2014 have year-end targets for the S&P of 1900 to 2100, well above Friday's close of 1775.32; their mean prediction is 1977. The bullish consensus might trouble contrarians, but Wall Street's pros see ample reason for optimism, given their expectations of a stronger economy and rising corporate profits.

In recent years, and especially in 2013, the market moved ahead because investors were willing to pay more for earnings. The Standard & Poor's 500 currently trades for almost 15 times analysts' next-12-month profit estimates, up from 13 times a year ago. Next year, however, the strategists expect earnings growth to do the heavy lifting, with S&P profits climbing 9%, compared with subpar gains of 5% in the past few years.

Specifically, the strategists eye S&P profits of $118, up from this year's estimated $108 to $109. Industry analysts typically have higher forecasts; their 2014 consensus is $122, according to Yardeni Research.

Profit growth will be driven mostly by a 2.7% increase in U.S. gross domestic product, which compares with this year's expected 1.7% gain. A more robust economy could encourage more capital spending and business investment, as well as more hiring, as corporate leaders see an uptick in customer demand.

Ironically, many market watchers believe that when the Fed tapers its bond-buying regimen, it will hasten an improvement in corporate confidence. For chief executives, such action, expected in the first quarter, would signal that the central bank sees a sustainable recovery, at last.

[image]
Technology and industrial stocks could be the biggest beneficiaries of a better economy around the world, the Street's strategists say. Tech stocks, in particular, trade for relatively low price/earnings ratios, and many of the group's members have cash-rich balance sheets.

The strategists continue to recommend that investors steer clear of sectors such as consumer staples, consumer discretionary, utilities, and telecommunications. Staples stocks aren't as leveraged as other sectors to a reviving economy, and consumer-discretionary issues sport sky-high P/Es, relative to historic valuations. It wouldn't take much in the way of bad news to knock them down.

Utilities and telecom stocks have performed poorly this year, in part because, with their rich dividends, they act as bond proxies. They aren't expected to thrive in a rising-interest-rate environment. The consensus view is that yields on 10-year Treasury bonds will climb to 3.4% next year from a current 2.8%. The 10-year yielded as little as 1.75% a year ago.

OUR EXPERTS DON'T SEE everything coming up roses. In particular, they worry that the Fed could make missteps under its new boss, Janet Yellen, when it begins to remove stimulus from the markets next year. Yellen is scheduled to replace Chairman Ben Bernanke on Feb. 1, pending confirmation by Congress.

The Federal Reserve must get the timing of any move right, and also must make clear the distinction between tapering and an actual hike in its federal-funds-rate target, now a puny 0.25%. The Fed sets this benchmark rate, which banks charge one another on overnight loans. Our seers expect the central bank to hold the rate steady until sometime in 2015.

If the Fed doesn't communicate its intentions well, the tapering period could become a rocky one for the stock market. And if the tapering is followed by a sustained deceleration in economic growth—well, it's hard to imagine that stocks would remain aloft.

The strategists will be keeping an eye on Washington, too, in the event Congress can't reach an agreement in the spring on raising the federal debt ceiling. Last week's bipartisan budget deal offers some hope, at least, that politics won't derail the bull market. Likewise, stocks have held up despite wars and political crises in other parts of the world.

Here is a closer look at four key factors that will shape financial markets in 2014.

Corporate Earnings
The U.S. economy hasn't enjoyed much of a recovery since the financial crisis of 2007-08, notes David Kostin, U.S. equity strategist at Goldman Sachs. This could be the year: The firm expects GDP growth to rise to 3%, which could help spur earnings growth.

Employment data and figures from the Institute for Supply Management support hopes for a pickup, Kostin says. In November, the ISM manufacturing purchasing managers' index advanced for the sixth straight month, to 57.3 from 56.4. A reading above 50 signals economic expansion.

Enlarge Image
image
Stephen Auth, Federated Investors' chief investment officer, is even more bullish. "We are entering Phase II of the bull—the return of an economics- and profit-growth-driven market," he declares.

Auth has been among the most consistently optimistic of the strategists we've consulted, and also on the mark. His year-end S&P target is the highest this year, as it was a year ago: 2100. Federated's forecast of 3.5% GDP growth in 2014 also tops the list.

"In the past five years, no one was making long-term investments," Auth says. As a result, corporations are sitting on $1 trillion of cash, and there is pent-up demand for investment around the world. Thomas Lee, the chief U.S. equity strategist at JPMorgan Chase, notes that U.S. gross fixed investment has fallen to 13% of GDP, on par with Greece and well below the 16% to 21% range that obtained from 1950 to 2007. Just getting back to the midpoint of that range would require additional spending of $600 billion, he observes.

VARIOUS ECONOMIC INDICATORS suggest that a recovery isn't limited to the U.S. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development reported on Dec. 9 that composite leading indicators in most major countries, both developed and emerging, are showing signs of improvement.

Interviewed on their outlook for the fall ("Fall Forecast: Sunny," Sept. 2), many strategists said they expected signs of economic acceleration to be visible in the second half of the year. Indeed, that's been the case: Investors applauded an upward revision in the third-quarter annualized GDP growth rate, to 3.6% from 2.8%, and a recent drop in unemployment, to 7% from 7.3%. But the bull is always hungry for more and better data.

Auth, of Federated, is looking for another leg up in the housing market, and in nonresidential construction. Gains in both would help to boost employment. Household balance sheets are in better shape, he notes, so consumer demand could remain steady.

The domestic boom in shale oil and gas is another boon to employment, and will lower energy costs for some industries, he adds.

The calendar, too, is a help. Addition will come from subtraction as the U.S. begins to lap some of the government's automatic spending cuts tied to the sequestration that began last spring, and the expiration of the Obama administration's 2% payroll-tax cut early this year. The government cost the economy perhaps 1.5 percentage points of GDP growth in 2013, but "government drag will be a lot less in 2014," predicts Auth.

Both people and companies will start to spend more in 2014, he adds.

To Taper—or Not?
That is the question—for the Fed, the economy, and Wall Street. Mere mention by the central bank of a desire to rein in its bond purchases sent jitters through the market this year. Stocks fell 6% last spring, after Bernanke, on May 22, broached the idea of stimulus removal.

When the tapering finally begins next year, the reaction might not be so negative, says Savita Subramanian, head of U.S. equity and quantitative strategy at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. That's because a rotation out of rate-sensitive stocks, including utilities, telecoms, and real-estate investment trusts, already has begun. Moreover, "tapering in the context of an improving economy is something investors should be happy about," she says.

Adam Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at Morgan Stanley, concurs: "Tapering won't be as negative as people think.…The Fed will taper when the economic data has improved enough."

BAD NEWS WAS GOOD this year, as the market frequently wilted on strong economic numbers or other seemingly positive information that suggested the Fed's assist might be drawing to an end. Conversely, stocks often rose on weak economic numbers, which implied that the central bank would leave its zero-bound interest-rate policy in place. Lately, stocks have been rising on stronger economic results, another sign of creeping normalcy.

Enlarge Image
image
The tapering process could test Yellen's mettle early in her tenure, and provoke market volatility. "But once investors get comfortable that tapering doesn't equate to a tightening of interest rates, markets will stabilize," says John Praveen, chief investment strategist at Prudential International Investment Advisors.

Our panel's predictions on year-end yields for the 10-year bond range widely, from 2.9% to 3.75%. (Bond prices move inversely to yields.)

Market Sectors
Jeffrey Knight, head of global asset allocation at Columbia Management, makes a strong case for industrial stocks, noting that "investors will increasingly gravitate to stocks correlated to the business cycle" as the economy picks up. Technology stocks, in particular, are leveraged to better economic growth.

While shares of the big hardware makers such as Microsoft (ticker: MSFT) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) are struggling, these stocks boast low valuations, and the companies have ample cash.

Russ Koesterich, global chief investment strategist at BlackRock, also is a fan of tech, noting the sector's impressive return on equity. Tech's ROE, based on trailing 12-month earnings, is 22%, significantly higher than the S&P's 15%. Also, technology outfits, which generally have little to no interest expense, won't be hurt by rising interest rates.

Despite its strengths, the tech sector doesn't trade at a premium to the market. The shares fetch 17 times trailing 12-month earnings, right in line with the S&P.

Koesterich also favors foreign stocks, which tend to be cheaper than U.S. issues. He recommends playing the global recovery in tech through exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, such as BlackRock iShares Global Tech (IXN). The table nearby highlights more stocks that our panelists believe will outperform the market in 2014.

Both industrials and techs offer international exposure, particularly to Europe and emerging markets, says Subramanian of BofA Merrill. European stocks have risen sharply, but U.S. stocks exposed to the Continent haven't seen comparable gains, she notes.

Cyclical stocks, which cross sector boundaries, are another favored group for 2014, given their economic sensitivity. According to JPMorgan's Lee, cyclicals, which include industrials, tech, materials, and consumer-discretionary shares, made the biggest contribution to year-over-year growth in third-quarter S&P 500 earnings. "That's a huge reversal from the first half of 2013," he says.

Yet cyclicals trade for 20 times trailing earnings, a big discount to many defensive issues.

Some market commentators have observed that profit margins are near all-time highs, suggesting limited room for expansion. But Tobias Levkovich, chief U.S. equity strategist at Citibank's Citi Research, calls that "malarkey." In eight of the 10 S&P sectors, margins on earnings before interest and taxes (Ebit) are lower than they were in 2007, which marked the previous high, he says.

Corporate America's bottom line has been helped by substantial declines in interest expenses and taxes. Although both are expected to rise next year, Levkovich still sees room for Ebit margins to widen as the recovery gathers steam.

CONSUMER-DISCRETIONARY SHARES have been big winners this year, but several strategists advise caution. "Discretionary has had a great run, and everyone loves and owns it," observes Subramanian.

Valuations are high, and she sees risks in multiple industries. Housing, she notes, has slowed a bit, and rising wages and costs related to health-care reform could hurt the retail and restaurant industries.

BlackRock's Koesterich agrees, noting that household income isn't rising rapidly, and that the labor market is growing more challenging for consumer-staples and discretionary stocks. "Many consumer stocks are priced for perfection," he says.

Enlarge Image
image
As for utilities and telecoms, they are bondlike and relatively expensive, comments Columbia's Knight. They are also sensitive to taper talk; they tanked in June, after Bernanke spoke about reining in quantitative easing.

Investment Risks
The market made headway this year in part because investors' worst fears weren't realized. The U.S. didn't default on its debt; China didn't experience a hard economic landing, interest rates remained benign, and Europe's debt crisis abated. Yet, every sunny forecast is subject to clouds, and the outlook for 2014 is no different.

As noted, the timing and manner of the Fed's stimulus withdrawal could pose major problems for stocks. Yellen & Co. will have to walk a tightrope, curbing the central bank's bond-buying while ensuring that investors don't misinterpret the move as a prelude to an imminent rise in the fed-funds rate. The Fed's change in command also presents added risk. "The market was comfortable with Bernanke," says JPMorgan's Lee. Yellen has to establish credibility, and "the potential for error is there."

No matter how well executed, a change in Fed policy will bring new uncertainties to the stock market, notes Barry Knapp, U.S. equity strategist at Barclays Capital.

The market hasn't suffered a serious setback in nearly two years, and that is potentially problematic, too. "We've had a 40% rally in the past 18 months with no correction," says Goldman's Kostin. "It's hard to identify why, but an increased probability of a correction next year is worth emphasizing."

A bout of volatility around the start of tapering is a reasonable expectation, says Citi's Levkovich. Even if the tapering goes smoothly, the market will start to worry about a coming interest-rate hike. Columbia's Knight doesn't see a boost in the fed-funds rate in 2014, but anticipation of a policy change in 2015 could roil the waters next year.

THE CONSENSUS VIEW IS that economic growth will accelerate globally in 2014. If that prediction proves wrong, "there is much more downside risk than from tapering alone," Knapp says,

The strategist also is worried about the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, which got off to an inauspicious start this fall. Further problems could erode consumer confidence, he suggests.

Europe's economy looks to be on the mend, but the recovery could stall. "You could end up with a meaningful disappointment in Europe, relative to expectations," says Levkovich.

Given this year's unusual gains, some strategists have looked to the past for hints about future performance. But the history is mixed.

Federated's Auth, for example, studied the market's performance after two consecutive years of double-digit returns. In 50% of cases, stocks advanced the next year. He concludes that "two years of big rises is not a reason to be bullish."

THE CURRENT BULL MARKET began in March 2009, and the S&P 500 has rallied 162% since then. Typically, bull markets that last more than four years eventually are knocked off course because of a recession, says JPMorgan's Lee.

Our strategists don't see a recession in 2014, just as they don't see negative equity returns—or a third year of 20%-plus gains. Instead, they see an unremarkable 2014 unfolding. After the thrills and spills of the past five years, chances are investors wouldn't complain about that.

Sector Snapshot
Only four sectors are beating the market this year, with consumer-discretionary in the lead. Bond-proxy sectors have been dragging.

Price Returns
S&P 500 Sector P/E* 2013** 2012 2011 2010
Consumer Disc 16.9 35.1% 21.9% 4.4% 25.7%
Health Care 16.0 34.1 15.2 10.2 0.7
Industrials 15.7 30.3 12.5 -2.9 23.9
Financials 12.9 28.2 26.3 -18.4 10.8
Info Technology 13.4 20.3 13.1 1.3 9.1
Consumer Staples 16.6 20.3 7.5 10.5 10.7
Energy 12.6 17.4 2.3 2.8 17.9
Materials 15.3 15.8 12.2 -11.6 19.9
Utilities 14.8 6.6 -2.9 14.8 0.9
Telecom 14.0 3.6 12.5 0.8 12.3
S&P 500 14.5 24.5 13.4 0.0 12.8
*Based on 2014 analysts' earnings estimates. ** Through 12/12.
Source: Bloomberg

View as Multiple Pages

>>> Faber, Rogers, Dent, Maloney, & Stockman – What Do They Say Is Coming In 201

Faber, Rogers, Dent, Maloney, & Stockman – What Do They Say Is Coming In 2014?

Some of the most respected prognosticators in the financial world are warning that what is coming in 2014 and beyond is going to shake America to the core. Many of the quotes that you are about to read are from individuals that actually predicted the subprime mortgage meltdown and the financial crisis of 2008 ahead of time. So they have a track record of being right. Does that guarantee that they will be right about what is coming in 2014? Of course not. In fact, as you will see below, not all of them agree about exactly what is coming next. But without a doubt, all of their forecasts are quite ominous. The following are quotes from Harry Dent, Marc Faber, Gerald Celente, Mike Maloney, Jim Rogers and nine other respected economic experts about what they believe is coming in 2014 and beyond...

-Harry Dent, author of The Great Depression Ahead: "Our best long-term and intermediate cycles suggest another slowdown and stock crash accelerating between very early 2014 and early 2015, and possibly lasting well into 2015 or even 2016. The worst economic trends due to demographics will hit between 2014 and 2019. The U.S. economy is likely to suffer a minor or major crash by early 2015 and another between late 2017 and late 2019 or early 2020 at the latest."

-Marc Faber, editor and publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom Report: "You have to say that we are again in a massive financial bubble in bonds, in equities, in [other] asset prices that have gone up dramatically."

-Gerald Celente: "Any self-respecting adult that hears McConnell, Reid, Boehner, Ryan, one after another, and buys this baloney… they deserve what they get.

And as for the international scene… the whole thing is collapsing.

That’s our forecast.

We are saying that by the second quarter of 2014, we expect the bottom to fall out… or something to divert our attention as it falls out."

-Mike Maloney, host of Hidden Secrets of Money: "I think the crash of 2008 was just a speed bump on the way to the main event… the consequences are gonna be horrific… the rest of the decade will bring us the greatest financial calamity in history."

-Jim Rogers: "You saw what happened in 2008-2009, which was worse than the previous economic setback because the debt was so much higher. Well now the debt is staggeringly much higher, and so the next economic problem, whenever it happens and whatever causes it, is going to be worse than in the past, because we have these unbelievable levels of debt, and unbelievable levels of money printing all over the world. Be worried and get prepared. Now it [a collapse] may not happen until 2016 or something, I have no idea when it’s going to happen, but when it comes, be careful."

-Lindsey Williams: "There is going to be a global currency reset."

-CLSA's Russell Napier: "We are on the eve of a deflationary shock which will likely reduce equity valuations from very high to very low levels."

-Oaktree Capital's Howard Marks: "Certainly risk tolerance has been increasing of late; high returns on risky assets have encouraged more of the same; and the markets are becoming more heated. The bottom line varies from sector to sector, but I have no doubt that markets are riskier than at any other time since the depths of the crisis in late 2008 (for credit) or early 2009 (for equities), and they are becoming more so."

-Financial editor Jeff Berwick: "If they allow interest rates to rise, it will effectively make the U.S. government bankrupt and insolvent, and it would make the U.S. government collapse. . . . They are preparing for a major societal collapse. It is obvious and it will happen, and it will be very scary and very dangerous."

-Michael Pento, founder of Pento Portfolio Strategies: "Disappointingly, it is much more probable that the government has brought us out of the Great Recession, only to set us up for the Greater Depression, which lies just on the other side of interest rate normalization."

-Boston University Economics Professor Laurence Kotlikoff: "Eventually somebody recognizes this and starts dumping the bonds, and interest rates go up, and inflation takes off, and were off to the races."

-Mexican Billionaire Hugo Salinas Price: "I think we are going to see a series of bankruptcies. I think the rise in interest rates is the fatal sign which is going to ignite a derivatives crisis. This is going to bring down the derivatives system (and the financial system).

There are (over) one quadrillion dollars of derivatives and most of them are related to interest rates. The spiking of interest rates in the United States may set that off. What is going to happen in the world is eventually we are going to come to a moment where there is going to be massive bankruptcies around the globe."

-Robert Shiller, one of the winners of the 2013 Nobel prize for economics: "I'm not sounding the alarm yet. But in many countries the stock price levels are high, and in many real estate markets prices have risen sharply...that could end badly."

-David Stockman, former Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan: "We have a massive bubble everywhere, from Japan, to China, Europe, to the UK. As a result of this, I think world financial markets are extremely dangerous, unstable, and subject to serious trouble and dislocation in the future."

And certainly there are already signs that the U.S. economy is slowing down as we head into the final weeks of 2013. For example, on Thursday we learned that the number of initial claims for unemployment benefits increased by 68,000 last week to a disturbingly high total of 368,000. That was the largest increase that we have seen in more than a year.

In addition, as I wrote about the other day, rail traffic is way down right now. In fact, for the week ending November 30th, U.S. rail traffic was down 16.3 percent from the same week one year earlier. That is a very important indicator that economic activity is getting slower.

And we continue to get more evidence that the middle class is being steadily eroded and that poverty in America is rapidly growing. For example, a survey that was just released found that requests for food assistance and the level of homelessness have both risen significantly in major U.S. cities over the past year...

A survey of 25 American cities, including many of the nation's largest, showed yearly increases in food aid and homelessness.
The cities, located throughout 18 states, saw requests for emergency food aid rise by an average of seven percent compared with the previous period a year earlier, according to the US Conference of Mayors study, published Wednesday.
All but four cities reported an increase in demand for assistance between the period of September 2012 through August 2013.
Unfortunately, if the economic experts quoted above are correct, this is just the beginning of our problems.

The next wave of the economic collapse is rapidly approaching, and things are going to get much worse than this.

>>> Weekly Market Update: The Long Melt Up Freezes in Place

Weekly Market Update: The Long Melt Up Freezes in Place

- Global equity markets retreated further from the highs seen at the beginning of December as participants cleared the decks ahead of the Fed meeting on December 17-18th. In Congress, a modest fiscal truce has been declared, raising hopes that the budget wars of the last three years are over. Data out this week was not quite as impactful as the reports out last week, but there was nothing that would dilute the impression that things are moving in the right direction. November retail sales rose 0.7%, topping the 0.6% gain in October. US import prices fell for a second straight month in November, thanks to lower oil and food prices. In Asia, there was speculation about additional BOJ easing as early as Q1 of 2014, helping to make the Nikkei the only major average to keep in the green this week. Growth in Chinese investment and industrial output eased slightly in November while retail sales grew at their strongest rate this year. Industrial output grew 10% y/y, a four-month low while retail sales rose 13.7% y/y. For the week, the DJIA lost 1.7%, the S&P500 dropped 1.7% and the Nasdaq fell 1.5%.

- On Wednesday Senator Murray and Representative Paul Ryan reached a two-year budget deal to fix federal spending at $1.012T in 2014 and $1.014T in 2015, reduce sequester cuts by $63B over the two years and also cut the deficit by a symbolic $20-23B. Speaker Boehner and the GOP Congressional leadership embraced the deal over howls of protest from Tea Party conservatives, and the House passed the measure in a 332-94 bipartisan vote, raising hopes that the budget wars are over for now. The Senate is expected to vote on the budget compromise next Tuesday.

- This week China held its annual week-long Central Economic Work Conference, at which the leadership sets the national agenda, including targets for 2014 GDP, CPI and M2. Rumors suggested that the conference would roll back Beijing's fiscal policy stance from "proactive" to "prudent," however, in the end the leadership maintained a "proactive" fiscal policy. The conference memo released after the event did not specify the GDP and inflation targets for 2014, although many have speculated the GDP target would be reduced to around 7.0% from 7.5% in 2013.

- The five Federal regulatory agencies that oversee the US financial system (the Fed, OCC, FDIC, CFTC and the SEC) approved the long awaited Volcker Rule this week. The rule constricts proprietary trading by banks and will come into effect most ironically on April 1st, 2014. By June large banks must begin reporting some data; full compliance with the rule is not required until July 21st, 2015. The FDIC's Hoenig said the rule does not fully deal with the risks in the financial system and could be used as the first step to a full segregation of investment and commercial banks.

- General Motors named Mary Barra as its first female CEO. She replaces Dan Akerson, who guided GM through most of the period since it emerged from bankruptcy in 2009. Barra joined GM 33 years ago and has held a series of manufacturing, engineering and senior staff positions. Additionally, the US Treasury announced that it had sold off the last of its stake in GM, noting that it had recouped a total of $39B of the $50B loaned to the company during the financial crisis.

- Microsoft's hunt for a new CEO continues to make headlines. Steve Mollenkopf, COO of wireless chipmaker Qualcomm, was anointed as QCOM's next CEO a day after he was mentioned in a news report as a possible successor to Microsoft's outgoing CEO Ballmer. Microsoft has considered several outside candidates, including Ford CEO Alan Mulally and VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger, as well as various Internal candidates. Ford reiterated this week that Mulally has no plans to leave the company.

- A little more than two weeks after the P5+1 group reached a deal to halt Iran's nuclear program, Iran walked away from continuing negotiations with world powers, accusing Washington of going against the spirit of the agreement reached last month by expanding its sanctions blacklist. Iranian officials said they were evaluating the situation and would make an "appropriate" response, while US Secretary of State Kerry said he fully expects talks to continue after participants "take a moment" to consult.

- Ireland became the first bailed-out Eurozone country to officially exit its financial rescue program. Over the last three years, the Irish Republic has received €85B in funding from its European partners. The move is largely symbolic, as the economy remains very fragile and debt levels remain very high, at 124% of GDP, while unemployment has only just declined to under 13%.

- EUR/USD extended last week's upswing to make one-month gains above 1.3800 on Wednesday, just shy of 2013 highs of 1.3830. Euro zone bond spreads narrowed markedly as officials sought an agreement on the banking union, including the single resolution mechanism. The EU wants to cement the historic agreement on banking union at a meeting on December 18th.

- USD/JPY and EUR/JPY hit multiyear lows late in the week as speculation builds about more BOJ easing. BOJ Governor Kuroda said the bank would continue to target 2% inflation and would stick with easy policy to keep inflation at 2% even after target was achieved. The yield on the benchmark 10-year JGB hit its highest level in two and a half months as the Nikkei index rebounded.

WSJ : Sprint Working on a Bid for T-Mobile US

Sprint Working on a Bid for T-Mobile US An Offer Would Test Whether U.S. Regulators Would Allow 3 Major Carriers

Sprint Corp. is working toward a possible bid for rival T-Mobile US Inc., people familiar with the matter said, setting the stage for a giant telecom merger that if permitted by regulators would leave the U.S. wireless market dominated by three big companies.

Sprint is studying regulatory concerns and could launch a bid in the first half of next year, the people said. A deal could be worth more than $20 billion, depending on the size of any stake in T-Mobile that Sprint tries to buy.

A merger of the third and fourth largest U.S. carriers would create a sizable competitor to industry leaders Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc. But it would likely face tough opposition from antitrust authorities, who worry consumers could suffer without a fourth national competitor to keep a check on prices.

Sprint hasn't yet decided whether to move ahead with a bid. Going forward despite regulators' concerns would be highly risky. Any pursuit of a bid by Sprint could be aimed at testing antitrust officials' reaction to a deal, and a bad reaction could put an end to the effort.

Any bid would come just months after Sprint and T-Mobile completed mergers of their own and would cap a period of extraordinary consolidation in the U.S. wireless market.

It has only been two years since the Justice Department shot down AT&T's $39 billion deal to buy T-Mobile. The smaller carrier is wary of wasting more time on an ultimately fruitless merger deal, people familiar with its thinking said.

Driving the current effort is SoftBank Chief Executive Masayoshi Son, an aggressive acquirer who bought control of Sprint earlier this year and has made no secret of his desire to grow in the U.S. via further deals. SoftBank currently owns more than 80% of Sprint.

Deutsche Telekom AG owns about 67% of T-Mobile US and is looking to possibly exit the U.S. market, the people said. T-Mobile, which became publicly listed this spring after merging with smaller rival MetroPCS Communications Inc., has a market capitalization of just over $20 billion.

Together, Sprint and T-Mobile would have nearly 53 million so-called postpaid subscribers—the industry's most creditworthy and lucrative customers. That would still leave the combined company a distant third to Verizon Wireless, which has about 95 million postpaid subscribers, and AT&T, with about 72 million.

Executives from Sprint and T-Mobile have argued publicly that the government should allow a combination of the two companies, as it would give them the scale to make the network investments and spectrum purchases needed to compete against Verizon Wireless and AT&T.

>>>US Close Dow+0,26% SlP+0,13% Nazdaq+0,20

Closing Market Summary: Stocks End Down Week on Flat Note

The stock market experienced a flat finish to an otherwise-forgettable week. The S&P 500 shed less than one point, maintaining its December loss of 1.7%. Small-caps outperformed as the Russell 2000 gained 0.4%, but the index remains lower by 3.1% this month.

Equities registered opening gains, but the early strength faded during the first 30 minutes of action, sending the major averages to their lows. The key indices spent the rest of the morning near their flat lines before staging a modest afternoon rally. However, selling pressure returned during the late afternoon, sending the S&P 500 back to unchanged for the day.

Today's rally attempts were fueled by the relative strength of four cyclical sectors as consumer discretionary (+0.3%), financials (+0.1%), industrials (+0.4%), and materials (+0.4%) outperformed throughout the session.

The discretionary sector displayed notable strength from the get go as media names advanced in reaction to news Charter Communications (CHTR 131.54, -0.45) is preparing an open letter to purchase Time Warner Cable (TWC 131.41, +0.35) for no more than $140 per share. However, Time Warner narrowed its gain to just 0.3% after a follow-up report indicated the proposed offer would be below $135 per share.

Elsewhere, the industrial sector advanced with help from defense contractors and transports. The PHLX Defense Index gained 0.6% while the Dow Jones Transportation Average added 0.4%.

Also of note, the materials space ended in the lead as steelmakers and miners outperformed. The Market Vectors Steel ETF (SLX 47.71, +0.30) settled higher by 0.6% while the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX 21.11, +0.10) gained 0.5% as gold futures increased 0.8% to $1235.10 per troy ounce.

The other commodity-linked sector, energy (-0.4%), ended at the bottom of the leaderboard as crude oil fell 1.0% to $96.53 per barrel. The sector was also pressured by Anadarko Petroleum (APC 78.30, -5.37), which lost 6.4% after the company was held liable for upwards of $14.50 billion in damages in the Tronox bankruptcy case.

Similar to energy, three of four countercyclical groups ended in the red while health care (+0.04%) outperformed.

Despite today's flat finish, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX 15.77, +0.23) suggested the presence of some demand for volatility protection. The near-term volatility measure registered its third consecutive gain, ending at its highest level since mid-October.

Treasuries registered slight gains, sending the 10-yr yield lower by one basis point to 2.87%.

Participation was well below average as only 627 million shares changed hands on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

Among news of note, the House of Representatives passed the budget deal with a 332-94 vote. The bill will now head to the Senate with a vote expected to take place on Tuesday.

Today's economic data was limited to the November PPI report, which pointed to a downtick of 0.1% while core producer prices rose 0.1%. Both readings matched expectations.

>Euro IPO Weekly Calendar

E$$zxpected to Price: * Monday, Dec. 16 * Qrf Comm VA (REITS); to be listed on Euronext Brussels Stock Exchange * Thursday, Dec. 19 * Carbios (environmental control) to be listed on NYSE Alternext Paris

Expected to Price and Start Trading: * Wednesday, Dec. 18 * MartinCo PLC (real estate) expected admission date to London Stock Exchange’s AIM * MoPowered (software) expected admission date to London Stock Exchange’s AIM * Benchmark Holdings (biotechnology) expected admission date to London Stock Exchange’s AIM

Expected to Start Trading: * Monday, Dec. 16 * Moncler (apparel); to be listed on Milan Stock Exchange

Lockup Expiry: * bpost SA (Dec. 18), BSC Drukarnia Opakowan (Dec. 19)

IPOs Amended/Withdrawn/Postponed This Week: * Candyking cancels IPO after supplier factory fires

Announced Over Past Week: * Action Hotels annouces intention to float on AIM; expected admission date Dec. 23 * Sanitec IPO priced at SEK61/shr * Mota-Engil seeks Africa unit IPO in 2Q 2014, targets London * Kodal Minerals annouces intention to float on AIM; expected admission late Dec. * Atlantic Petroleum IPO priced at NOK140/shr * Moncler IPO priced at EU10.20/shr, at top of range * Koch says Metro would only sell minority stake in Russian unit

News to Follow: * Franchise Brands Worldwide plans IPO: Sunday Times * HSBC may sell 30% stake in U.K. retail bank in IPO: FT * Diamond to return to banking with Africa investment vehicle; plans to float acquisition vehicle, known as Atlas Mara, on London Stock Exchange before yr-end: FT * ONO considers IPO of 30% of business in May: Expansion * Tomkins said to work with Goldman Sachs on sale or IPO in 2014 * Clayton Dubilier & Rice said to prepare Exova London share sale * Space SpA IPO books close Dec. 13

>>> Circle Oil Plc Updates on Operations in Tunisia

Circle Oil Plc Updates on Operations in Tunisia
- The Company has been advised that approval has been received from the Tunisian Government, following a competitive bid process, to acquire a permit on a block in the Cap Bon peninsula covering a similar area to the previously owned (now expired) Grombalia permit in which Circle was a minority partner with Tunisian company Exxoil (operator). Circle will be the operator and hold a 100% working interest in the new permit and has the right to apply for conversion to production licence areas in the event of exploration success.
- The licence covers an area of 2,820 sq km and is in an area which includes existing oil and gas field concessions including Cap Bon gas field, Belli oil field, and the El Manzah producing oil field. The Beni Khaled producing oil field concession, where Circle is now a 30% W.I. partner (Exxoil 70% and operator) is entirely enclosed within the new permit. Other discoveries such as Zinnia, Bir Drassen, and Tiref, exist within or are close to the block, and Circle recognises a number of prospects and many leads which have similar geological features to known accumulations. The main targets are the fractured Eocene to Upper Cretaceous carbonates and Lower Cretaceous sandstones, although other plays may be developed following collection of further data.
- Estimates of in place, pre-drill, unrisked, resources on five separate structures prepared by external consultants for the previous operator range from 16MMboe to more than 200MMboe and totalled 480MMboe. These figures will be subject to revision following the receipt of new data to be acquired by Circle.