>>> US Gapping Up


Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
: NNVC +8.4%, RYAAY +6.9%, AU +4.8%, DB +2.1%.

M&A news: VTUS +2.8% (to merge with Assembly Pharma in an all-stock transaction), PFE +1.5% (AZN rejects Pfizer's (PFE) final proposal), DTV +0.1% (AT&T (T) to Acquire DIRECTV for $95 per share).

Select metals/mining stocks trading higher: HMY +2.5%, GFI +2.1%, ABX +1%, SLV +1%, GOLD +0.8%, GDX +0.8%, GLD +0.7%.

Other news: ITMN +5.5% (presents Phase 3 ASCEND study of Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis), QUIK +3.4% (seeing continued strength, after being +17.5% on Friday), WWE +3.4% (bouncing following Friday's sell-off), STEM +2.9% (provides update on Its Phase I/II study in spinal cord injury; significant sensory gains observed in additional patients), SNMX +1.8% (announces two-year extension of sweet program collaboration with PepsiCo (PEP)), AVP +1.7% (positive Barron's mention).

Analyst comments: EXXI +5.2% (upgraded to Strong Buy from Outperform at Raymond James), GOGO +3.8% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at UBS), KEYW +1.9% (upgraded to Buy at Chardan Capital Markets), ETFC +1.5% (upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Raymond James), MU +1.3% (upgraded to Outperform from Sector Perform at RBC Capital Mkts), PRU +0.9% (added to Best Ideas list at Morgan Stanley)

(BFW) AstraZeneca Board ‘Bit Surprised’ to See 55-Pound Bid: Chairman...


 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: BOARD WILL SIT DOWN IF ISSUES RESOLVED, PRICE MET
 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: BOARD WANTS TO SEE PRICE OF 58.85 POUNDS OR BETTER
 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: PFIZER MUST RESOLVE OTHER ISSUES BEFORE FORMAL TALKS
 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: BOARD `BIT SURPRISED' TO SEE NEW OFFER OF 55 POUNDS
 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: PFIZER SAID SUNDAY 53.50 POUNDS WAS LAST, BEST OFFER
 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: PFIZER ONLY TALKING ABOUT PRICE, NOT OTHER ISSUES
 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: BOARD CONCERNED ABOUT EXECUTION RISK, OTHER ISSUES
 BN 05/19 12:14 *JOHANSSON: WOULD NOT SAY IF ASTRAZENECA BOARD IS UNANIMOUS
 BN 05/19 12:14 *ASTRAZENECA CHAIRMAN LEIF JOHANSSON SPEAKS IN PHONE INTERVIEW

AstraZeneca Board ‘Bit Surprised’ to See 55-Pound Bid: Chairman
2014-05-19 12:22:34.671 GMT


By Oliver Staley
     May 19 (Bloomberg) -- Pfizer said Sunday 53.50 pounds was
last and best offer, AstraZeneca Chairman Leif Johansson says in
phone interview.
  * Pfizer must resolve other issues before formal talks
  * Johansson: “They want to do price, and price only”
  * AstraZeneca board concerned about execution risk, other
    issues
  * Board wants to see price of 58.85 pounds or better
  * Board will sit down if issues resolved, price met
  * Johansson wouldn’t say if AstraZeneca board is unanimous
  * NOTE: AstraZeneca Rejects Pfizer’s $117 Billion Offer as Too
    Low {NSN N5TDTF6K50Z2<Go>}

Link to Company News:{AZN LN <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{PFE US <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the reporter on this story:
Oliver Staley in London at +44-20-3216-4369 or
ostaley@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Kristen Hallam at +44-20-7673-2584 or
khallam@bloomberg.net

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

Gapping up: VTUS +9.4%, QUIK +7.3%, GOGO +2.6%, PFE +2.3%, AVP +2%, RYAAY+2%, CGEN +1.5%, ABX +1.2%, SLV +1%, GOLD +1%, GDX +0.9%, VALE +0.9%, GLD+0.7%

Gapping down: AZN -11%, CPB -4.1%, CSIQ -3.7%, T -2.8%, BCS -2.4%, ING -2.1%,UBS -1.9%, NBG -1.7%, LYG -1.4%, RBS -1.3%, SAP -1%

FT : Final offer may not be Pfizer’s last

Final offer may not be Pfizer’s last

There might still be haggling to come for AstraZeneca
What is the difference between a “final proposal” and a “full and final offer”? A whole heap of haggling, perhaps. Pfizer’s “final proposal” to buy AstraZeneca, at £55 a share, may not be the end of the story. This despite a rejection of the approach by the UK drug company on Monday morning and a 14 per cent fall in its shares in early trading.
The 45 per cent premium to the undisturbed price offered by Pfizer is enough to convince many shareholders. What may give them pause for thought is that although the cash element has been increased from 33 per cent to 45 per cent, they would still take the remainder in the US group’s stock. The value of these shares could take a dive if the tax benefits driving this deal are unpicked by angry US legislators.

The tilt at AstraZeneca by Pfizer of the US has been playing out as a compressed version of Kraft’s purchase of Cadbury a few tears ago – necessarily so, since UK takeover rules were reformed to preclude such long sieges. Amid political furore, a big US company has been executing a bear hug on a smaller UK rival for largely defensive reasons.
Cadbury, chaired by Roger Carr, demurred prettily enough to get the bid value up. Similarly, AstraZeneca’s chairman Leif Johansson named his price for a recommended offer in his rejection statement – £59 a share, which represents a steep 21 times forward earnings.
Investors are liable to ask him to give Pfizer’s hard-nosed boss Ian Read a peek at the books as an incentive to go above £55 a share.
By the same token, Mr Read could probably better his offer to legislators, who with their natural penchant for inaction have just gone on holiday. They have been threatening to investigate and perhaps block the bid on national interest grounds. This would almost certainly be illegal under European law. A hiatus for wrangling with the European Commission would probably kill off the transaction, though.
It could be enough for Mr Read to guarantee a minimum sum of research spending for the UK for a fixed period to quell dissent. Pre-merger assurances have legal force for at least a year, a second reform triggered by the Kraft takeover. The siege defence mentioned earlier was a “put up or shut up” deadline for a firm offer. This is May 26 for Pfizer, but may be extended with AstraZeneca’s agreement.
Ultimately, both companies are in the same spot as blockbuster drugs developers in a world where the returns for blockbuster drugs are attenuating. Not so much two bald men fighting over a comb as two greying men scrapping over a bottle of Grecian 2000, if that is what market credibility amounts to. A pact to share the stuff is still possible.

(The Telegraph) Divorce helps fuel rise in female multi-millionaires

Divorce helps fuel rise in female multi-millionaires // Full article :{http://bit.ly/1p5gaTS}

The number of women on the Sunday Times Rich List has risen by nearly 50 per cent in 10 years, from 78 to 114, but most have inherited their vast wealth, share it with a partner or have been awarded it through divorce hearings

High profile divorces are bolstering the number of female multi-millionaires with the trend expected to continue as more wealthy couples square up in British courts this year.


The number of women on the Sunday Times Rich List has risen by nearly 50 per cent in 10 years, from 78 to 114.


However just two women, JK Rowling, 48, and Tamara Mellon, 46, have made fortunes in their own right. The rest have inherited their vast wealth or own businesses jointly with their husbands, or have won it in divorce hearings.


Galina Berezovsky, 55, Irina Abramovich, 46, and Slavica Ecclestone, 55, all walked away with millions when they divorced their husbands.


Russian Oligarch Boris Berezovsky’s wife was awarded £100 millon, while Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich is believed to have been forced to part with £150 million.


Bernie Ecclestone’s £2 billion divorce made his former wife one of Britain’s richest woman.

Slavica, a former Armani model, currently has an estimated wealth of £740 million and is ranked 136th richest in Britain, although it recently emerged that she has paid the Formula One tycoon £300 million since they split in2009.

The trend is likely to continue. Figures from the ONS show that the number of British couples getting divorced has risen since the end of the recession.

According to the Office for National Statistics there were 118,140 divorces in England and Wales in 2012, an increase of 0.5 per cent on the total for 2011.

The ONS said the year-on-year rise could be a reflection of the changing economic situation.

It suggests that couples trapped in unhappy marriages could have been waiting for the value of their house or investments to recover before attempting to split their assets.

Leading divorce lawyer Ayesha Vardaga claims women today are less likely to put up with ‘the shenanigans, the loneliness, the betrayal’ of a failed marriage if the alternative is ‘a series of big fat cheques, her home in her sole name and the freedom to do exactly what she wants to.’

“Where times are tight, it’s unattractive to go out into the frozen economic wastes alone, but once the money starts to flow again, it’s tempting to go out and grab your own bucket,” she said.

A slew of upcoming divorce hearings suggests the list will grow. Michelle Young, 50, is seeking £300 million from her property tycoon husband Scott which would see her jump to 325th on the list.

And former Miss Malaysia Pauline Chai, 66, could be awarded £500 million when she divorces Laura Ashley owner Khoo Kay Peng, 74, this year which would see her enter the list at 199.

However, Former maths teacher Tony Hawken, 57, is likely to find a spot in next year’s list after announcing his split from Chinese multi-millonairess Xiu Li, 51. Mr Harken claims he is fed up with being wealthy.

This year’s Rich List shows that Britain’s most affluent people are becoming wealthier than ever, with a combine fortune of £518.975 billion, 15 per cent more than last year’s £449.654 billion.

A minimum of £85 million is needed to even be considered for the list this year - compared to £80 million in 2008 at the height of the pre-crash boom and £75 last year.

To get into the top 500, the rich need £190 million - double the £80 million required in 2004 and up £30 million from the £160 million cut off point for last year's list.

Philip Beresford, who has compiled the ranking since 1989, said: "I've never seen such a phenomenal rise in personal wealth as the growth in the fortunes of Britain's 1,000 richest people over the past year.

"The richest people in Britain have had an astonishing year.

"While some may criticise them, many of these people are at the heart of the economy and their success brings more jobs and more wealth for the country."

Most distinguished among the old money names, the Queen had a sterling year as she added £10 million to her personal fortune and is now ranked 285 with £330 million.

Former Tesco boss Sir Terry Leahy, who stepped down at the supermarket chain in 2011, was among the new entrants with a worth of £100 million, ranking at 863.

The digital economy also showed its growing purchasing power as four members of King Digital Entertainment, which is behind the addictive Candy Crash game, joined the list for the first time too.

Entertainers featured heavily in the 50 Young Rich list for those aged 30 and under.

Former Harry Potter star Emma Watson, 24, is now estimated to be worth £30 million, up £3 million on last year, as she builds a career for herself as a Hollywood leading lady.

Husband and wife Marcus Mumford 27, and Carey Mulligan, 28, joined the young list for the first time with a joint fortune of £13 million from their music and films.

Last week it was announced that the list's compilers had found that the number of billionaires living in Britain has risen to more than 100 for the first time.

Some 104 billionaires are now based in the UK - more than triple the number from a decade ago - with a combined wealth of more than £301 billion.

It means Britain has more billionaires per head of population than any other country, while London's total of 72 sterling billionaires is more than any other city in the world

The list is based on "identifiable wealth" - including land, property, other assets such as art and racehorses, or significant shares in publicly quoted companies. It excludes bank accounts, which the Sunday Times has no access to.

WWD : Snapchat: Catching the Eye of Fashion

Forget sexting — fashion brands are beginning to mine the marketing potential of Snapchat’s ephemeral messages. While brands like the buzz around Snapchat and its younger user base, they are still experimenting with the service and have yet to quantify its impact on their bottom line. The three-year-old messaging service is also still working out some kinks, recently reassuring users following Federal Trade Commission privacy allegations.

But that doesn’t appear to have slowed down Snapchat, which early on drew attention as a venue for the exchange of explicit photos — images sent via the service disappear after a few seconds, although there are ways for users to get around this feature and retain snaps. Brands are coming to realize that the app has something that almost no other marketing vehicle does — a lock on the consumer’s attention. Because of a “snap’s” time limitations, a recipient is forced to stop and focus when they open a message, something TV, radio, magazines and other social media cannot offer.

This ability to break through the clutter gives Snapchat a one-up on many of its peers that has helped it become the leading third-party messaging app in North America by traffic volume because it is all pictures, according to a report released by Sandvine last week. Snapchat says 700 million snaps are sent every day, but it isn’t the biggest messaging service globally. For instance, WhatsApp users send 700 million photos and 100 million videos daily.

Victoria’s Secret, Nasty Gal, Rebecca Minkoff, Free People, Wet Seal and Nars are now all using the app to complement their presences on other social platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest. Having said that, Snapchat is unlikely ever to become a serious threat to replacing any of those platforms, especially because for now it is difficult to measure its usage base when it comes to fashion brands.

Snapchat doesn’t reveal specific figures about brands it works with, and brands must go through the app to see how many followers they have — but the service does appear to be gaining momentum.

Christian Parkes, Nasty Gal’s vice president of brand marketing, said founder and chief executive officer Sophia Amoruso originally set up what is Nasty Gal’s Snapchat account for her personal use in October.

“It snowballed. It was superfun, but supercrazy because it was direct access,” Parkes said. “She was watching them individually, and adding them manually. It started as something really fun, but then we were like, ‘Oh, this is huge.’ We had to wrestle the account from her.”

The brand took over Amoruso’s account in December and began taking a more formal approach, sitting down with the team at Snapchat to discuss ways to maximize Nasty Gal’s presence on the app.

“It’s still really new, and truth be told, they [Snapchat] are still figuring out how to build this so that it’s more user-friendly and more applicable to brands if you want to speak on a large scale, as opposed to intimate one-on-one conversations,” Parkes said.

Nasty Gal used the app during New York Fashion Week with a snap telling customers to come to a certain spot to get a $100 gift certificate to nastygal.com. The brand also hired its social media intern via Snapchat, urging applicants to send a snap to the brand’s account for consideration.

“As a brand, you can talk to the user on a really intimate level,” Parkes said. “With the exception of direct messaging, this is the most personal you can get from a social platform. Partly because it’s in its infancy, but partly because it’s least polished of any of the platforms from a content standpoint.”

Like Nasty Gal, Free People director of marketing, public relations and engagement Kathryn O’Connor sees Snapchat as “more real time and raw” than other social media outlets. She noted that content on other image-based platforms — such as Pinterest and Instagram — is largely editorially driven curated photos.

“It’s a little more in the now than some of our other more planned-out channels,” O’Connor said.

Free People has taken to Snapchat aggressively since the end of February, now posting one snap a day. The app played a role in the launch of the brand’s intimates collection in early April. Given Snapchat’s racy reputation, the brand thought it would be a good venue to give followers a preview of the line.

Rebecca Minkoff sent out snaps of its spring looks moments before they hit the runway.

“Snapchat is where we would share revelations of new things, perks and sneak peeks during important events for the brand,” Minkoff said, noting that women make up 70 percent of the platform’s user base.

“Usage differs between all three platforms [Snapchat, Instagram and Pinterest] — Instagram and Pinterest are used daily, meanwhile Snapchat is reserved for momentous happenings,” Minkoff said.

Snapchat is well positioned to understand the dynamic between the different social media players, having hired Instagram’s former chief operating officer Emily White in December.

The messaging platform is inching its way into the fashion industry at a time when the app is under intense scrutiny.

Two weeks ago, the firm reached a settlement with the FTC, which alleged that Snapchat deceived users about the disappearing nature of its messages.

Snapchat said users would be notified if a recipient tried to take a screenshot of a snap; however, anyone with an Apple device and an operating system pre-dating iOS7 could take a screenshot without being detected. There are also third-party apps that aid in the capture and saving of Snapchat content.

For brands, though, this likely has little impact, since larger organizations are more concerned with their messages having a broad reach than whether or not they actually disappear.

Snapchat published a post on its blog May 8 decreeing its devotion to user privacy and acknowledging that it’s learned from and fixed its mistakes, noting that most of the issues addressed by the FTC had already been resolved.

“The [social mediums] that are getting the most engagement are mobile and highly visual,” said Maureen Mullen, Luxury Lab, or L2, director of research and advisory. “Snapchat has both of that in spades, coupled with an incredibly attractive young user demographic and independence that hasn’t been tainted by some of the more mature social media platforms.” (The company’s independent streak came into full view when 23-year-old cofounder and ceo Evan Spiegel turned down a $3 billion offer from Mark Zuckerberg to buy the company.)

However, Mullen argued that unless Snapchat is more transparent about its metrics, brands can’t have confidence that they’re reaching an audience at scale.

While Mullen is certain that one in five fashion brands who use Snapchat early will be effective on the medium, she remains wary of the service’s applicability to the fashion and retail space in the long term.

“You are going to see a percentage of brands that are on Snapchat, but a lot of brands have abandoned that new, next mentality to focus much more deeply on what’s working for them already,” Mullen said.

(BFW) Deutsche Bank Sees 2Q Equities Rev Trending Down Y/y


Deutsche Bank Sees 2Q Equities Rev Trending Down Y/y
2014-05-19 06:53:53.368 GMT


By Chris Malpass
     May 19 (Bloomberg) -- Deutsche Bank says 2Q FICC revenue
trend broadly unchanged vs 1Q, CFO Stefan Krause says on analyst
call.
  * Says Deutsche committed to being global universal bank
  * To boost client advisers in wealth mgmt by 15%
  * Says doesn’t see big litigation costs in near term
  * Says litigation outlook remains challenging
  * Says “no change” to litigation forecast this year
  * EARLIER: Deutsche Bank’s Jain Says Not Happy With Current
    Share Price

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Chris Malpass in Berlin at +49-30-70010-6234 or
cmalpass@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
James Ludden at +44-20-7673-2645 or
jludden@bloomberg.net
Chris Malpass

(Santander) French Telecom : M&A More Haste, Less Speed

* No room for the incumbent to acquire. In our opinion, it is
highly unlikely that Orange could participate in any consolidation
deal due to its dominant position (41% market share in fixed;
35% in mobile). On the other hand, we think that Orange cannot
afford to spend €6bn in cash to acquire Bouygues as this would
put its debt rating under enormous pressure, so any move, which
we deem unlikely, should be financed mainly with shares. In our
view, Orange’s comments last Thursday intend to promote
consolidation more than show a real interest in Bouygues.

* Vivendi should not support any deal affecting SFR. We do
not see SFR/Numericable participating in any additional moves
before closing their own deal, which is expected to happen in
early 2015E, as this would delay Vivendi’s possibilities of cashing
in on its disinvestment in SFR.

* Iliad/Bouygues the only realistic possibility. Following the
previous two comments, we only see a deal between Iliad and
Bouygues as a realistic possibility, but the price should be low
enough for Iliad to be able to extract value from the agreement,
considering Iliad’s slim cost structure as a competitive advantage
which could be cut by merging with Bouygues. We think that Iliad
is not in a hurry to acquire Bouygues and would try to mature the
deal to reduce the price.

* Regulation continues being an uncertainty. French antitrust
and telecoms regulators have not said a word on being more
open to further consolidation in the market, and both regulatory
bodies are not directly controlled by the government. As in other
countries, the conditions to be established by the EU on the
pending deal between Telefonica and KPN in Germany on June 25
should be key to defining the scenario for consolidation in other
countries.

* Investment Action. Pressure on further consolidation in the
French Telecoms market continues to increase. However, we do
not see this happening in the short term as currently we think
Iliad acquiring Bouygues is the only real possibility and that in
this case, Iliad would try to reduce the price. Consolidation should
be positive for the whole sector but we would be cautious on
strong short term stock reactions, especially following Orange’s
recent good performance.