WSJ : Google Considers Buying Spotify But Finds the Price Too High

Google Considers Buying Spotify But Finds the Price Too High
Talks Break Down For Number of Reasons, Including Valuation and Luke-Warm Larry Page

Google Inc. GOOGL +0.86% tried to buy music-streaming service Spotify AB late last year, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Talks broke down for a number of reasons, including the high price Spotify was asking, as well as Google Chief Executive Larry Page's lack of enthusiasm for subscription entertainment services.

Google executive Susan Wojcicki, who took the top job at YouTube in February, was a primary advocate for buying Spotify, according to this person.

Spotify and Google declined to comment.

Google disclosed in a December letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission that it had "pursued but discontinued a potential buyout of a foreign company, with a valuation estimated in the range of $4 [billion] to $5 billion."

Spotify last raised equity financing at a valuation of $4 billion but was looking to be sold at a price well above $10 billion, says the person familiar with the talks.

Tech blog Re/code reported Google's interest in acquiring Spotify on Monday.

In May, Apple Inc. AAPL +0.83% agreed to buy Spotify competitor Beats Music LLC, along with its sister company, headphone maker Beats Electronics LLC, for a total of $3 billion. Apple is paying only $500 million of that sum for the seven-month-old subscription music service, according to people familiar with the matter, though they cautioned the price breakdown was largely an accounting issue for Apple.

Spotify has more than 10 million paying subscribers world-wide and another 30 million users of its free service. Beats Music has several hundred thousand paying subscribers.

Music has been a key pillar of Apple's mobile ecosystem since it introduced the iPod and iTunes in 2001. Google is trying to catch up with a number of initiatives, including its own subscription service: Google Play Music All Access. Google also said earlier this month that it had bought streaming service Songza Inc. for an undisclosed amount.

NY POst : Fox’s Time Warner bid could hit $105 a share

Getting to “yes” doesn’t have to be difficult for a merger agreement between Time Warner and 21st Century Fox.
It might even be easy, according to Moody’s Investors Service, which in a report Monday laid out a scenario in which Fox could offer $105 per share for Time Warner without jeopardizing its credit rating.
That’s $20 more per share than Time Warner turned down from Rupert Murdoch’s company earlier this month.
Moody’s scenario also boosts the deal’s cash component to $35.34 billion, up from $28.88 billion in Fox’s initial proposal.
The beauty of Moody’s analysis, however, is Fox’s not having to break the bank to reel in Time Warner.
In fact, the credit rating agency projected a Fox-Time Warner combo could return to Fox’s coveted leverage ratio — 3.0 times debt to Ebitda — inside of 18 months.
Fox would initially commit the $5 billion to $7 billion in annual free cash flow the merged entity stands to generate to debt reduction.
That’s if Fox also sells some $14 billion in assets, Moody’s added, which just happens to be the price that Fox’s Italian and German pay-TV assets — 100 percent-owned Sky Italia and 57 percent-owned Sky Deutschland — are expected to fetch.
Speculation already has Fox shopping the two units to British Sky Broadcasting Group.
“Based on its valuable and diversified portfolio of assets amassed over the years,” Moody’s concluded, “we believe Fox has ample flexibility and strategic alternatives to finance the deal while maintaining a strong balance sheet.”
The question would then be the receptivity of Time Warner to a sweetened offer.
A change in its bylaws Monday, which quashed the ability of shareholders to call special meetings, indicates if Time Warner isn’t all that receptive, it will at least be thorough.
Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes has a number of reasons — $80 million worth — to consider the combo.
That’s how much Bloomberg estimated he would take home should there be a takeover.

FT : US warned of up to 25 groups eyeing foreign switch to cut tax

US warned of up to 25 groups eyeing foreign switch to cut tax
By Barney Jopson in Washington and Ed Hammond in New YorkAuthor alerts

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) speaks to members of the press as he is on his way for a vote January 6, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Janet Yellen was confirmed by the Senate with a vote of 56 - 26 to become the first woman to head the Federal Reserve Board. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)©Getty

Up to 25 more US companies are considering relocating overseas to cut their tax bills this year, a top Democratic lawmaker has warned, as he assailed investment bankers for encouraging them.
The prediction came as concern mounts in Washington over a rise in merger deals, known as inversions, which US multinationals use to move their headquarters to countries with lower corporate tax rates.

They were thrust into the spotlight by Pfizer’s unsuccessful $116bn attempt to buy UK rival AstraZeneca. Angst is now rising over Walgreens, a drugstore chain that could use its agreed takeover of Switzerland-based Alliance Boots to redomicile.
Ron Wyden, the chairman of the Senate finance committee, intensified his attacks on inversions on Tuesday. “The inversion virus now seems to be multiplying every few days,” he said. “How many more infections can America’s economic body endure?”
He complained that even as they hurt US employment and shrank the country’s tax base, the deals were being promoted by “fast-buck artists” such as investment bankers, private equity groups, lawyers and accountants.
“With the investment bankers in that inversion feeding frenzy, there may be 25 more inversions during [this year],” he told a hearing of the Senate finance committee.
In inversion deals in the past month, Medtronic announced the $42.9bn acquisition of Dublin-based Covidien and AbbVie agreed to acquire the UK’s Shire for $54bn.
Speaking for the Obama administration, Robert Stack, a senior official at the US Treasury department, told the hearing: “We are aware of many more inversions in the works right now”.
Companies and their advisers on both sides of the Atlantic remain undaunted by the political onslaught in Washington, calculating that the chances of Congress passing bipartisan legislation to curb inversions are slim.
Last week, Jack Lew, the Treasury secretary, urged lawmakers to pass a White House proposal – backed by Mr Wyden – to stamp out inversions, which would lift the foreign ownership threshold for such deals from 20 per cent to 50 per cent.
Although senior Republicans have also lambasted inversions, the two parties cannot agree on how to tackle the problem.
Senator Orrin Hatch, the top Republican on the finance committee, criticised proposed countermeasures from the White House and others as being mainly “punitive and retroactive”. He said that rather than “incentivising American companies to remain in the US, these bills would build walls around US corporations in order to keep them from inverting.”

He added that they could have the unintended consequence of encouraging “reverse acquisition” inversions by making US companies more attractive targets for foreign suitors.
Chris Krueger, an independent analyst at Guggenheim Securities, said the probability of Congress taking action on inversions this year was less than 10 per cent.
Lawmakers will go on a five-week recess next week and when they return minds will be focused on November elections.
In a statement echoed by many Republicans, the Business Roundtable, which represents blue-chip companies, said last week that inversions were symptoms of the broader failures of a US tax system that hampers US competitiveness.
It said “piecemeal” bills to curb the deals were not the answer and repeated its longstanding calls for comprehensive tax reform.
Mr Wyden said he had invited the chief executives of several companies doing inversions to testify, but they had not accepted.

>>> Apple beats by $0.05, misses on revs; guides Q4 revs below consensus, gross

Apple beats by $0.05, misses on revs; guides Q4 revs below consensus, gross margin in-line  

Reports Q3 (Jun) earnings of $1.28 per share, $0.05 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $1.23; revenues rose 6.0% year/year to $37.43 bln vs the $38.02 bln consensus.
* Q3 gross margin of 39.4% vs. Street expectations of ~37.9% and 36.9% last year.
* iPhone units of 35.2 mln vs. Street expectations of just Under 36 mln and 31.2 mln last year
* iPad units of 13.3 mln vs Street expectations of just under 14.5 mln and 14.6 mln last year.
* Mac units of 4.4 mln vs Street expectations of just under 4 mln and 3.8 mln last year.

Co issues downside guidance for Q4, sees Q4 revs of $37-40 bln vs. $40.46 bln Capital IQ Consensus; sees Q4 gross margins of 37-38% vs. Street expectations of just under 37.5% (vs. 37% last year.


--> -0,60% after hours

>>> US CLsoe Dow +0,36% S&P +0,50% NAsdaq +0,71%

Closing Market Summary: Small Caps Lead Stocks Higher

The stock market finished the Tuesday session on an upbeat note with small caps pacing the rally. The Russell 2000 advanced 0.8%, while the S&P 500 added 0.5% with eight sectors ending in the green.

Although geopolitical concerns factored into the modest retreat on Monday, the worries were cast aside today after separatist forces in eastern Ukraine handed over black boxes from MH17 to Malaysian authorities and Secretary of State John Kerry began working on brokering a cease fire in Gaza.

Furthermore, the sentiment was boosted by a slate of mostly better than expected earnings. Notably, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG 659.77, +69.84) soared 11.8% after beating estimates and surpassing comparable restaurant sales growth expectations. However, McDonald's (MCD 96.27, -1.28) painted a less upbeat picture with its stock falling 1.3% in reaction to below-consensus earnings and revenue. Elsewhere among consumer discretionary components, Comcast (CMCSA 54.63, +0.81) added 1.5% after reporting better than expected results.

While the discretionary space (+0.5%) contained a fair share of outperformers, energy (+0.8%) and health care (+0.8%) sectors hovered near the lead throughout the session. Energy rallied even as crude oil fell 0.5% to $102.35/bbl, while health care received support from biotechnology. The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 253.68, +2.82) advanced 1.1%.

There was an added headline stir in the health care space as separate judicial rulings at the federal appellate level contradicted each other regarding the legality of subsidies received to help pay for health care via the federal exchanges. The initial ruling from a federal appeals court panel covering Washington D.C. ruled 2-1 that those subsidies are illegal. Soon thereafter, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 that the subsidies are legal.

Despite the conflicting rulings, the sector held its ground, implying a belief that the initial ruling would not translate into law anytime soon (if at all). The second ruling helped validate that belief and likely set the stage for a review of the rulings by the full circuit court in both areas and potentially the Supreme Court. Unlike health care, other countercyclical sectors could not keep up with the broader market. The telecom services sector (+0.3%) eked out a slim gain, while consumer staples (-0.2%) and utilities (-0.2%) finished in the red.

The consumer staples sector lagged amid weakness in the shares of Coca-Cola (KO 41.19, -1.21). The Dow component lost 2.9% despite reporting a one-cent beat. Like Coca-Cola, another Dow component—United Technologies (UTX 110.86, -2.12)—also settled lower despite beating estimates.

The relative weakness among blue chip listings had little impact on the performance of high-beta names. Chipmakers (PHLX Semiconductor Index +0.7%), biotechnology (IBB +1.1%), and transport stocks (Dow Jones Transportation Average +1.1%) all finished ahead of the broader market, while the Russell 2000 regained its 50- and 100-day averages.

Treasuries retreated in the early morning, but reclaimed their losses during the day. The 10-yr note ended flat with its yield at 2.46%.

Participation was on the light side with less than 600 million shares changing hands at the NYSE.

Economic data included CPI, FHFA Housing Price Index, and Existing Home Sales:
  • Consumer prices increased 0.3% in June, down from a 0.4% increase in May, which matched the consensus estimate 
    • As expected from the June PPI report, a strong increase in energy prices, up 1.6% in June, was the main catalyst for the overall increase in consumer prices. That was the largest increase in monthly energy costs since December 
    • Gasoline costs rose 3.3% after increasing 0.7% in May 
    • Food prices moderated a bit in June, increasing only 0.1% after growing by at least 0.4% per month since February 
    • Excluding food and energy, core CPI increased 0.1% in June after increasing 0.3% in May, while the consensus expected an increase of 0.2% 
  • The May Housing Price Index from the FHFA rose 0.4%, which followed a revised increase of 0.1% observed during the prior month (from 0.0%) 
  • Existing home sales increased to 5.04 million SAAR in June from an upwardly revised 4.91 million SAAR (from 4.89 million SAAR) in May, while the consensus an increase to 5.00 million SAAR 
    • This was the first time sales exceeded 5.00 million SAAR since October 2013. Still, sales are down 2.3% year-over-year 
Tomorrow, the weekly MBA Mortgage Index will be released at 7:00 ET. On the earnings front, participants will be reacting to results from Apple (AAPL 94.72, +0.78), Boeing (BA 129.74, +1.44), and Microsoft (MSFT 44.83, -0.01), among others.
  • S&P 500 +7.3% YTD 
  • Nasdaq Composite +6.7% YTD 
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +3.2% YTD 
  • Russell 2000 -0.7% YTD

>>> Juniper Networks beats by $0.02, reports revs in-line; guides Q3 EPS below c

Juniper Networks beats by $0.02, reports revs in-line; guides Q3 EPS below consensus, revs below consensus 

- Reports Q2 (Jun) earnings of $0.40 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.02 better than the Capital IQ 
* Consensus Estimate of $0.38; revenues rose 6.9% year/year to $1.23 bln vs the $1.22 bln consensus.
Co issues downside guidance for Q3, sees EPS of $0.35-0.40, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $0.44 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate; sees Q3 revs of $1.15-1.20 bln vs. $1.26 bln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate
* In the near term, there are some customer-specific dynamics that the Co is factoring into its outlook.
* This is partially offset by signs of strength in emerging verticals. The Co is focused on continued innovation and executing on its Integrated Operating Plan.

>>> Electronic Arts beats by $0.23, beats on revs; guides Q2 EPS in-line, revs i

Electronic Arts beats by $0.23, beats on revs; guides Q2 EPS in-line, revs in-line; guides FY15 EPS below consensus, revs in-line 

* Reports Q1 (Jun) earnings of $0.19 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.23 better than the Capital IQ * Consensus Estimate of ($0.04); non-GAAP revenues rose 56.6% year/year to $775 mln vs the $713.54 mln consensus.
* Co issues in-line guidance for Q2, sees EPS of $0.50, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $0.50 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate; sees Q2 non-GAAP revs of $1.14 bln vs. $1.14 bln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate
* Co issues downside EPS guidance for FY15, sees EPS of $1.85, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $1.88 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate; sees FY15 non-GAAP revs of $4.10 bln vs. $4.14 bln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate.

WSJ : Deutsche Bank Suffers From Litany of Reporting Problem

Deutsche Bank Suffers From Litany of Reporting Problems, Regulators Said

Letter From New York Fed Said Some Reports From Deutsche Bank's U.S. Operations Were 'Inaccurate and Unreliable'

An examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that Deutsche Bank AG DBK.XE +0.85% 's giant U.S. operations suffer from a litany of serious problems, including shoddy financial reporting, inadequate auditing and oversight and weak technology systems, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

In a letter to Deutsche Bank executives last December, a senior official with the New York Fed wrote that financial reports produced by some of the bank's U.S. arms "are of low quality, inaccurate and unreliable. The size and breadth of errors strongly suggest that the firm's entire U.S. regulatory reporting structure requires wide-ranging remedial action."

The criticism from the New York Fed represents a sharp rebuke to one of the world's biggest banks, and it comes at a time when federal regulators say they are increasingly focused on the health of overseas lenders with substantial U.S. operations.

The Dec. 11 letter, excerpts of which were reviewed by the Journal, said Deutsche Bank had made "no progress" at fixing previously identified problems. It said examiners found "material errors and poor data integrity" in its U.S. entities' public filings, which are used by regulators, economists and investors to evaluate its operations.

The shortcomings amount to a "systemic breakdown" and "expose the firm to significant operational risk and misstated regulatory reports," said the letter from Daniel Muccia, a New York Fed senior vice president responsible for supervising Deutsche Bank.

The New York Fed has various tools at its disposal to address shortcomings by banks it regulates. It can issue private letters demanding action, as it did with Deutsche Bank, or, in more severe cases, impose restrictions on banks' activities.

The letter, which hasn't been previously reported, ordered senior Deutsche Bank executives to ensure steps were taken to fix the problems. It also said the bank might have to restate some of the financial data it has submitted to regulators.

"We have been working diligently to further strengthen our systems and controls and are committed to being best in class," a Deutsche Bank spokesman said Tuesday. As part of this, he said, the bank is spending €1 billion globally and appointing 1,300 people, including about 500 compliance, risk and technology employees in the U.S. Mr. Muccia declined to comment.

The German lender's U.S. businesses, including investment banking, asset management and transaction processing, collectively account for as much as $600 billion of assets, or more than one quarter of Deutsche Bank's global total, executives say. Large portions of the U.S. operations were previously the responsibility of Anshu Jain, who today is Deutsche Bank's co-chief executive. The bank's current North American CEO is Jacques Brand. The bank spokesman declined to comment on behalf of both men.

The New York Fed's concerns also pose a challenge for Deutsche Bank's longtime finance chief, Stefan Krause, who is ultimately responsible for the company's financial figures and has been spearheading efforts to improve the quality of the bank's reporting.

The concerns from regulators strike at the heart of an issue plaguing many of the world's big banks: Some investors lack confidence in the integrity of their numbers. Such fears have been especially prevalent in Europe.

The letter sent to Deutsche Bank shows that the New York Fed's concerns about its U.S. operations have been building for years.

"Since 2002, the FRBNY has highlighted significant weaknesses in the firm's regulatory reporting framework that has remained outstanding for a decade," Mr. Muccia wrote. He added: "Most concerning is the fact that although the root causes of these errors were not eliminated, prior supervisory issues were considered remediated and closed by senior management."

Deutsche Bank's external auditor, KPMG LLP, also identified "deficiencies" in the way the bank's U.S. entities were reporting financial data in 2013, according to a Deutsche Bank email reviewed by the Journal.

Deutsche Bank's annual report and other filings have included a letter from KPMG signing off on the bank's financial statements.

A KPMG spokesman declined to comment.

Deutsche Bank's U.S. operations have been the source of regular headaches for the lender, partly due to regulatory concerns about the adequacy of its capital buffers. The bank in June raised €8.5 billion (about $11.5 billion) of new capital by selling shares to investors.

The complaints from regulators largely center on data from two big U.S. Deutsche Bank subsidiaries, and the New York branch of the German parent company. That data goes into filings that all U.S.-regulated banks file with regulators each quarter. The resulting reports, crammed with thousands of lines of densely packed data, are a trove of information for regulators, analysts and investors.

But in 2002, 2007 and 2012, New York Fed examiners voiced concerns to Deutsche Bank about the quality of the data, according to the December letter.

After conducting its 2012 annual assessment, for example, the New York Fed flagged a specific concern about how a Deutsche Bank subsidiary was classifying potentially troubled assets. The unit, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, wasn't properly assessing the value of collateral when it reported the value of loans where borrowers were at risk of defaulting, according to a New York Fed letter to Deutsche Bank in June 2013. Regulators said that made the unit's reports "inaccurate."

The New York Fed's concerns intensified when a review of the bank's regulatory reporting got under way last August. At a September meeting with two of Deutsche Bank's top U.S. executives, Fed officials described the bank's reporting as the worst among its peers, according to the Deutsche Bank email about issues raised by regulators. Mr. Muccia, a 40-year veteran of bank regulation, and his team said the trust-company unit had misclassified the riskiness of 20% of its loans. Despite finding dozens of problems, the Fed team was "just scratching the surface," according to the email.

A few months later, Mr. Muccia sent his letter detailing the exam's findings and more than a half-dozen areas in need of "immediate" action.

Many of the problems stemmed from a "disjointed" regulatory-reporting system and "weaknesses" in the technology systems used by Deutsche Bank subsidiaries. Instead of automatically compiling and reporting data to federal regulators, Deutsche Bank officials were making manual changes to more than 800 pieces of data, the letter said. That data was tied to a variety of balance-sheet items, such as certain types of loans and deposits, whose values totaled about $337 billion.

WSJ : Danone Weighs Expansion Opportunities

Danone Weighs Expansion Opportunities Strategic Review Comes at Critical Time for French Dairy Group Dealing With Problems in China, Bigger Rivals

PARIS— Danone SA has launched a strategic review as Chief Executive Franck Riboud seeks to ensure its long-term growth, amid renewed speculation over whether the French dairy group can survive as a stand-alone company.

Mr. Riboud—who has led Danone for close to 20 years after taking over from his father—has asked top managers to explore areas of potential expansion, said a person familiar with the matter. Managers will present initial ideas at a meeting in the French town of Evian in September with a view to completing a new strategic plan by early 2015, the person added.

"There is a deep reflection about what Danone needs to do to make sure the group is still growing 50 years from now," said the person. "I would be surprised if the group kept the status quo."

The maker of Evian water and Activia yogurt is examining whether it should pursue any big deals or tie-ups to gain more heft. "The group is looking at all the options it has in theory," said the person.

A spokeswoman for Danone confirmed the strategic review. She declined to comment on the possibility of pursuing a larger deal.

The rethink at Danone comes at a critical time for the French company. Danone has been seeking to bounce back from a series of knocks over the past few years, starting with the effects of the economic crisis in Europe to a massive food safety warning a year ago that dramatically hit one of its key growth drivers, baby food in China.

"There clearly is a change in mind-set going on as management is publicly addressing the problems they are having, which they have been hesitant to do in the past," said James Targett, an analyst with Berenberg.

Danone's challenges have refocused analyst attention on its relatively small size compared with Swiss food giant Nestlé SA NESN.VX +0.80% .

After having sold off a series of noncore assets in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Danone's business today is focused on four activities: Fresh dairy, baby food, water and medical nutrition. With a market value of about €36 billion, it is much smaller than Nestlé, with a market capitalization of around €180 billion. Some people within the company say Danone may be too small to compete with such giants, said another person familiar with the matter.

At an investor seminar in June, the French dairy company hinted that it was working on a plan dubbed "Danone 2020." The group stressed it was focusing on changing the organization and cost base of its dairy business in Western Europe to improve profit margins, which have declined over the past four years. Danone also said it is working on improving its return on invested capital—a barometer of the company's ability to make profitable investments.

The group has been hurting from cost-conscious European consumers trading down to cheaper products amid the economic downturn. At the same time, the group is facing the hefty challenge of convincing Chinese parents to again trust its baby-formula brands, after a massive food safety warning from a big supplier—which later turned out a false alarm—prompted the recall of thousands of cans of baby formula across eight Asian markets last year, causing sales to tumble sharply.

Analysts expect weakness in European dairy and baby food in Asia to continue to weigh on first-half numbers due on Friday, with its profit margin expected to drop by almost two percentage points to 11.4%.

The company launched a new high-end baby-formula product under its Nutricia brand to help it regain market share in China—where it almost entirely relies on its Dumex brand, which was affected by the recall.

Danone has also taken steps to become leaner—cutting costs, shedding jobs, shutting down some manufacturing sites and shuffling management across Europe.

"The company is restructuring its business now in the way I thought they should have done two or three years ago," said Warren Ackerman, an analyst at Société Générale. "But there are so many moving parts that it is difficult to gauge exactly what strategic direction the company will take."

Danone soon could be slimming down further. The company has been in talks with several suitors, most notably Nestlé, over a potential sale of its medical-nutrition business, people familiar with the matter have said. Such a deal could fetch between €3 billion and €6 billion, depending on how much of the business the group would sell, analysts say. Danone and Nestlé declined to comment.

"What I am interested in is what they would do with the proceeds," said Mr. Ackerman.

In a recent note to clients, Natixis analysts said "pending tangible signs of change, a takeover could become an increasingly plausible scenario," with either PepsiCo Inc. PEP -0.73% or Nestlé the most likely buyers. Other analysts have speculated about Danone purchasing U.S. baby food maker Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. MJN +3.13% Danone, Pepsi, Nestlé and Mead Johnson declined to comment.

Following rumors in 2005 that Pepsi was considering a bid for Danone, France passed a law barring foreign investment in 11 strategic sectors, which became known as the "Danone law."

Some Danone watchers aren't convinced a big deal will happen this time either.

Mr. Ackerman said the group's emphasis on improving its return on invested capital after having had a rather poor track record for creating returns on previous large deals indicates a big acquisition isn't in sight as such a move would again put pressure on return on invested capital.

"Strategically, Mead would be a great move as it would boost Danone's presence in key baby food markets such as China, the U.S. and Latin America," said Mr. Ackerman. "But financially, it would be very dilutive to returns. My view is they don't need to do Mead if their Chinese baby milk business recovers."

SAP Gives Omnicom Global Communications and Advertizing Contract

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

SAP Gives Omnicom Global Communications and Advertizing Contract 2014-07-22 17:07:58.199 GMT

By Alex Webb July 22 (Bloomberg) -- SAP has consolidated its global account for communications, advertizing, media and marketing with Omnicom, co. says in e-mailed statement.

Link to Company News:{SAP GR <Equity> CN <GO>} Link to Company News:{OMC US <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>} First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Alex Webb at +49-89-24447-8802 or awebb25@bloomberg.net