>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
: DTLK +19%, RBS +12.8%, ACTG +12.5%, LOGM +11.8%, QLIK +11.2%, AWAY +10.3%, ECHO +9.3%, DECK +8.5%, BIDU +7.8%, SWI +7.6%, LEA +7.5%, MLNX +6.5%, RFMD +6.3%, ALGN +6.1%, ATRC +5.6%, MKTO +5.5%, PFPT +3.7%, PSO +3.2%, COLM +2.7%, GRAM +2.7%, CTCT +2.4%, VOD +2.3%, RVBD +2.2%, UHS+2.1%, CBI +2%, HBOS +1.8%, MCO +1.6%, BLDR +0.9%, MPWR +0.9%, SPSC +0.9%, VRSN +0.8%, BJRI +0.8%, .

M&A news: TRLA +0.5% (follow through premarket following yesterday's M&A spec).

Select EU financial related names showing strength following RBS update: NBG +3%, BCS +2.5%, SAN +0.9%.

Other news: ACRX +7.1% (confirms July 27, 2014 PDUFA date for Zalviso), MGNX +6.3% (still checking), KERX +4% (co announced Zerenex (ferric citrate) long-term Phase 3 study results were published in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology), ATLS +3.3% (declared 6.5% increased quarterly distribution of $0.49 per common unit), SVU +2.4% (positive Mad Money mention),PT +2.1% (still checking), SNE +1.6% (still checking, Nikkei was up over 1% last night).

Analyst comments: PBR +0.8% (upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Barclays)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up: DTLK +19%, RBS +13.5%, LOGM +11.3%, QLIK +11.1%, AWAY +11%, ECHO +10.8%, ACTG +10.5%, DECK +8.5%, BIDU +7.8%, SWI +7.6%, MGNX +6.3%, ALGN +6.1%, MLNX +5.7%, ATRC +5.6%, MKTO +5.5%, RFMD +4.5%, ACRX +4.2%, KERX +4%, PFPT +3.7%, ATLS +3.3%, PSO +3%, COLM +2.7%, GRAM +2.7%, CTCT +2.4%, BCS +2.3%, RVBD +2.2%,PT +2.1%, UHS +2.1%, CBI +2%, VOD +2%, HBOS +1.8%, LEA +1.8%, MCO +1.6%, SAN +0.9%, BLDR +0.9%, MPWR +0.9%, SPSC +0.9%

Gapping down: WCG -19.2%, BCOV -15.3%, MXIM -11.2%, NTGR -10.8%, INFA -10.6%, AMZN -10%, P -8.1%, TPX -5.1%, EPR -4.8%, KLAC -4.1%, MTSN -4.1%, WIRE -4.1%, CB -3.5%, TRLA -3.2%, FSL -3.1%, GIMO -3.1%, LSCC -3%, SBUX -2.6%, STO -2.3%, GSJK -1.9%, WSTG -1.9%, V -1.7%, LPNT -1.5%, MA -1.4%, GM -1.4%, TCB -1.2%, IM -1%, KEG -0.9%, DTE -0.9%,SWFT -0.8%, GS -0.6%

>>> Stanley Black & Decker beats by $0.06, misses on revs; raises FY14 EPS above

Stanley Black & Decker beats by $0.06, misses on revs; raises FY14 EPS above consensus
Reports Q2 (Jun) earnings of $1.43 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.06 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $1.37; revenues rose 1.0% year/year to $2.89 bln vs the $2.94 bln consensus.
  • Co issues raised guidance for FY14, sees EPS of $5.50-5.60 from $5.35-5.50, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $5.43 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate.
  • The gross margin rate for the quarter was 36.5%. Excluding charges the gross margin rate was also 36.5%, up 100 basis points from the prior year rate of 35.5%, as price, productivity and cost actions more than offset significant unfavorable currency.
  • Guidance Commentary: "We anticipate a stronger full year financial performance within certain of our businesses, most notably the Industrial segment, and further Company-wide cost savings to more than offset slightly lower full year organic sales growth due to the weather impact on the CDIY outdoor product season and slower underlying emerging markets growth. This revised guidance is consistent with our EPS profile in recent years whereby approximately 45% of annual EPS typically falls within the first half of the year. We have strong conviction that our 2014 free cash flow will be at least $675 million inclusive of approximately $250 million of one-time payments primarily relating to 2013 restructuring actions."

>>> Stanley Black & Decker beats by $0.06, misses on revs; raises FY14 EPS above

Stanley Black & Decker beats by $0.06, misses on revs; raises FY14 EPS above consensus
Reports Q2 (Jun) earnings of $1.43 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.06 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $1.37; revenues rose 1.0% year/year to $2.89 bln vs the $2.94 bln consensus.
  • Co issues raised guidance for FY14, sees EPS of $5.50-5.60 from $5.35-5.50, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $5.43 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate.
  • The gross margin rate for the quarter was 36.5%. Excluding charges the gross margin rate was also 36.5%, up 100 basis points from the prior year rate of 35.5%, as price, productivity and cost actions more than offset significant unfavorable currency.
  • Guidance Commentary: "We anticipate a stronger full year financial performance within certain of our businesses, most notably the Industrial segment, and further Company-wide cost savings to more than offset slightly lower full year organic sales growth due to the weather impact on the CDIY outdoor product season and slower underlying emerging markets growth. This revised guidance is consistent with our EPS profile in recent years whereby approximately 45% of annual EPS typically falls within the first half of the year. We have strong conviction that our 2014 free cash flow will be at least $675 million inclusive of approximately $250 million of one-time payments primarily relating to 2013 restructuring actions."

FT : Fiat checks out Peugeot as marriage partner

Fiat-Chrysler chief executive Sergio Marchionne has made something of a name for himself selling ambitious business plans to sceptical investors.
But even he cannot kid himself when it comes to the hard road ahead for his US-Italian car company.

“To delude ourselves that we can do everything by ourselves is nonsense,” Mr Marchionne said recently. “[And] there are some people who are looking for marriage partners.”
One of those may be PSA Peugeot Citroën, the French carmaker, which has held talks over the past year with Mr Marchionne’s Fiat-Chrysler, said four people with knowledge of the discussions.
The talks did not progress, but were aimed at finding a possible way to bring together two struggling, middle-ranking carmakers with ambitions of becoming a strong, global player, said the people briefed on the talks.
Fiat-Chrysler says it is not currently in talks with Peugeot, while the French carmaker denies it has held merger talks with the US-Italian company.
PSA’s deal with Dongfeng Motor earlier this year gave the French carmaker some respite from its problems but did not provide a long-term solution, proponents of a potential Fiat deal told the FT, while Fiat recognises that it needs to increase its business faster than organic growth would feasibly allow.
Mr Marchionne and Carlos Tavares, his counterpart at Peugeot, both need scale, greater efficiency in Europe, and ways to bring down their investment costs per car as they compete with far larger and richer rivals.
In addition, Mr Marchionne’s tired-looking Fiat and Chrysler product portfolios, some of the oldest in the industry, could benefit from ideas from PSA’s development labs, and Mr Tavares could be keen to leverage FCA’s strong presence in North and South America.
"Fiat still needs scale, especially in Europe, and it really needs some help with its product pipeline," one of the people with knowledge of the talks said. "FCA's turnround plan only works if you have more scale than today."
For China’s Dongfeng, which owns a stake in Peugeot, any tie-up with Fiat-Chrysler would further enhance its position as China’s most prominent carmaker in the global market, and chime with Beijing’s ambitions to create a more advanced and mature car industry.
The two companies have history. The Agnelli family, which controls Fiat, is close to the Peugeot dynasty, and Mr Marchionne has always seen PSA as a natural partner for Fiat.
Talks between the two would pit the demands and expectations of two of Europe’s most famous industrial families, who in the past have had concerns over what would happen to their shareholdings.


But PSA’s deal with Dongfeng has reduced the stake of the Peugeot family, and its power over the carmaker, and some members of the Agnelli family are thought to be more open to a possible deal with any investor if it brightened the business prospects for their business, which has not generated significant returns recently.
Peugeot shareholders also include the French state, which could object to any shift in ownership after struggling so hard to keep the industrial champion under French ownership late last year.
Those briefed on the talks say that any potential deal is most likely to happen after Peugeot has pushed ahead with its restructuring following the Dongfeng deal, and Fiat-Chrysler has completed its own corporate reshaping, including shifting its incorporation outside of Italy and listing in New York.
Mr Marchionne is credited with the rough yardstick coined a few years ago that a global carmaker needs to build and sell 6m cars a year to stay globally competitive. FCA will sell less than 5m this year.
Adding in PSA would bring the total to close to 8m, based on their current sales and growth estimates, within touching distance of the Renault-Nissan alliance, and a couple of million cars behind Volkswagen, Toyota and General Motors.
But aside from the basic numbers, any form of combination of the two groups would raise large integration challenges.
Peugeot and Fiat-Chrysler have a number of overlapping markets and product segments, which could concern antitrust bodies.
Together, Fiat and Peugeot have a 17 per cent market share in Europe, second to Volkswagen with 25 per cent. While any possible deal could lead to synergies, especially in purchasing and distribution, it could force politically sensitive plant closures in Europe, where both companies are wrestling with inefficient and underused factories.
Moreover, while it could also give Fiat a stronger foothold in some Asian markets where PSA is growing, and give Peugeot access to the US market, thanks to Chrysler. Previous deals in the car industry, such as Daimler’s ill-fated merger with Chrysler, prove practice is far harder than theory.

FT : Why tax systems are trickier than Martian algebra

Only radical restructuring has a chance of creating fair taxation, writes Tim Harford

Tax is a divisive subject but everyone seems to agree on one point: taxes are too complicated and should be simpler. Unfortunately, tax systems did not receive the memo.
In the UK only a few years ago, almost everyone in work used to be taxed at a marginal rate of either 31 per cent or 41 per cent, depending on how much they earned. (If Brits do not recognise those numbers, it is because the UK has two cumulative systems of income tax, one of which goes by the code name of “national insurance”.)
The system is trickier today than Martian algebra. Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal studies points out that, over different levels of income, a non-working spouse with two children will be taxed at marginal rates of 12 per cent, 32 per cent, infinity, 42 per cent, 60 per cent, 42 per cent, 60 per cent, 42 per cent and 47 per cent. You might ask what kind of muppet designed a tax schedule like that, and one answer would be George Osborne, chancellor of the exchequer, and Alistair Darling, his predecessor – the last two men to be in charge of the UK tax system.

Another answer would be that this is just the sort of thing that happens without diligent maintenance. Window frames rot. Iron structures rust. Tax systems become complex.
Having nine different marginal tax rates is an ugly sign that things are not well. There are others. Cereal bars attract value added tax at 20 per cent but flapjacks enjoy a zero rate; vegetable chips are tax-free if the vegetable in question is not a potato; dried fruit is subject to VAT unless destined for a cake. On a gingerbread man, chocolate icing attracts a substantial VAT liability unless the icing constitutes the eyes. There are more things in tax accounting, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
If a tax break for unfrosted gingerbread seems uniquely British in its eccentricity, it is not. Officials in New York state have been obliged to rule on the tax status of burritos. (Legally they are sandwiches and attract sales tax of 8 per cent.) Or consider Pillow Pets, a stuffed toy/ pillow whose slogan – “It’s a pillow, it’s a pet, it’s a Pillow Pet” – poses a dilemma for US Customs. For the purposes of levying a tariff, is it a pillow? Or is it a tariff-free toy pet?
Then there are tax subsidies for agricultural land in places such as Florida. Agricultural land is no easier to define than a flapjack or a sandwich. Rent a cow, let it graze on your garden or vacant lot; if that is not agriculture, what is?
All this matters not just because the rules are hard to understand and expensive to obey but also because taxes shape our behaviour. The “camelback” houses of late 19th century New Orleans, with a hump of two storeys at the rear and a long single-storey snout stretching to the street, were tax-efficient because property taxes were levied based on the number of storeys at the front of the house. Abba’s outlandish outfits are reported to have been inspired by tax rules: they were tax-deductible only if they were too outré to be worn anywhere other than on stage.
These are trivial examples of tax-efficient charm but the same principle can be harnessed for a far greater good: a carbon tax to shift our energy system towards low-carbon fuels. Well-designed taxes can raise revenue while rewarding green behaviour.
Meanwhile complex, illogical taxes raise less revenue while rewarding clever accountants. There has been outrage over celebrity tax-dodging in the UK but the tax avoidance schemes usually involve a government attempt to provide a tax incentive for the British film industry or some other hobbyhorse.
What is behind such insanities? Partly, absurd loopholes exist because special interest groups demand them; hence the subsidies for land with cows on it. Partly, voters are given the tax systems they deserve because we sympathise with highly vocal losers whenever a loophole is closed and we fall for simple tricks that hide taxes behind a veil of complication.
The UK’s two-tier income tax system is a good example. Basic income tax rates have tended to fall over time, while national insurance rates have tended to rise. True income tax rates for the typical worker are similar to those of 35 years ago but they seem much lower. The sleight of hand is politically convenient but increases complexity, creates unfairness and opens opportunities for tax avoidance.
It is tempting, then, to call for a radical simplification, for taxes simple enough to write on the back of a postcard. But this ignores the third reason that taxes are complex, which is that fair taxation is a genuinely complex business. This year’s piecemeal reform efforts become next year’s loopholes.
Only radical, systemic reform has much chance of success – and it may be less elegant than some reformers hope. A per-person “poll tax” was introduced in the UK 25 years ago, and promptly ended the premiership of Margaret Thatcher. It was undoubtedly simple – but in taxation, as in life, simplicity is not the only virtue.

(BofA-ML) The Flow Show - Equities $5b Outflows (Out : US & Eur In : EM & JP)

>>> Asset class flows
* Equities: $5.0bn outflows (all outflows via ETF”s – especially SPY)
* Bonds: $1.9bn inflows (5 straight weeks) (Table 1)
* Commodities: flat

>>> Equity flows
* EM: 7 straight weeks of inflows ($0.2bn) (Table 3)
* Japan: 5 straight weeks of inflows ($0.6bn)
* Europe: 3 straight weeks of outflows ($0.1bn)
* US: $7.6bn outflows (largest in 9 weeks and driven by SPY selling)
By sector, real-estate funds see largest inflows in 9 weeks ($1.1bn)

>>> FICC flows
* Largest weekly outflows ($4.8bn) from HY bond funds since Jun’13 (Table 2)
* 31 straight weeks of inflows to IG bond funds ($4.2bn)
* 17 straight weeks of inflows to EM debt funds ($0.3bn)
* Largest weekly inflows to Govt/Tsy funds in 9 weeks ($1.8bn)
* Outflows from floating-rate debt funds in 14 out of past 15 weeks ($0.4bn)