>>> Fed's Bullard: Reiterates forecast for first rate hike in Q1 of 2015, disagr

Fed's Bullard: Reiterates forecast for first rate hike in Q1 of 2015, disagrees with Fed's discription of labor resources 
- FOMC is doing a great deal of work to prepare for the policy exit 
- Market expectations for rate path is lower than current Fed forecasts 
- Unemployment rate to fall to 5.8% by the end of 2015 
- Worried about inflation expectations slipping lower in Europe, ECB needs to take action

(BFW) Statoil May Shelve $6.7b Snorre Project Due to Costs: Upstream

--> for Oil services
1
1

Statoil May Shelve $6.7b Snorre Project Due to Costs: Upstream
2014-08-22 08:12:01.542 GMT


By Mikael Holter
Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- While Snorre partners disagree on
economic viability of redevelopment project, operator Statoil
has no alternative to new tension-leg platform, Upstream
reports, without saying where it got info.
* Justifying investment is “challenging”; 2013 tax increase
has weakened Snorre 2040 project economics, Upstream says,
citing unidentified Statoil spokesman
* State-owned Petoro hopes added reserves, concept
optimization can still make project profitable, spokesman
Sveinung Sletten says in Upstream report
* NOTE: Norway Vigilant on Delays as Oil Producers Set to
Slash Spending, see June 16 story: NSN N79AAK6JTSED <GO>
* NOTE: Statoil Snorre Recovery Project Hesitation Criticised
by NPD, see April 3 story: NSN N3GM4C6K50XT <GO>


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Mikael Holter in Oslo at +47-22-00-8209 or
mholter2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Will Kennedy at +44-20-7073-3603 or
wkennedy3@bloomberg.net

FT : Common sense disappears in mining mergers

Common sense disappears in mining mergers
Thankfully focus is now on costs, cash and core assets

Many a good mine is spoiled by sinking the shaft, as the old adage goes. The new adage might run: many a good mining company is spoiled by a merger.
The charge-sheet is long and damning, from Rio Tinto’s hubristic takeover of Alcan, which ended in the humiliation of a rescue rights issue, to the deal that is being unwound with as much dignity as BHP can muster, its value-destroying purchase of Billiton.

However, pride of place must go to the merger that (fortunately) never was, BHP Billiton’s assault on Rio Tinto. It is frequently forgotten how close this barmy idea came to fruition: it was only the regulatory delays that eventually ran it into Pilbara’s desert sands. BHP had argued that it was merely iron ore production that would be merged (with splendid cost savings, of course) rather than sales. To which the Chinese eventually replied: pull the other one.
Perhaps it is something about mining and those at the top of these vast enterprises. The actual process of winning the minerals is really quite dull, once you have got used to the sheer scale of the production, so when the investment bankers send round their hottest M&A boys, the executives are vulnerable to their sales pitch.
Think of the impact of a “transformational” deal, the thrill of the chase, the media spotlight, the boasting rights and – of course – the massive pay rises. You will be number one! Ride the commodities supercycle! No wonder common sense disappears, along with the first rule of mining investment (never buy an aluminium producer). By the time it all ends in tears, the executives who have laid waste to the shareholders are long departed with their winnings.
Today’s mantra is the workaday one of cost reduction, cash generation and concentration on core assets. This is certainly less damaging than corporate hubris, but if everyone is selling mines at the same time, decent prices will be hard to realise. In the case of Billiton, it is a fair bet that most of its assets have already been hawked round the industry before BHP chief executive Andrew Mackenzie produced his plan. Ah well, demerger is so much easier, since it avoids having to price the bits he does not want.
It may be that BHP will be better off without Billiton, although the feeble justification about “focus” turns the usual economies of scale argument on its head. Meanwhile, both BHP and Rio are cranking up production of iron ore just when Chinese demand is weakening. The gains from more output will be more than wiped out by lower prices.
The only good news is that cash that might have been spent on empire-building is now more likely to come to the shareholders. We should be grateful for small mercies.
Buy toothbrushes
The latest M&A boom is well under way, the escape of Time Warner from Rupert Murdoch notwithstanding. This is music to the bankers’ ears, but their joy is not quite unconfined, since too many companies are doing without them.
Two-thirds of technology acquisitions in America worth over $100m so far this year have dispensed with bank advisers. This may be because the bankers have little more idea than the rest of us of exactly what Nest Labs, DeepMind or Songza do.
These three (among others) have been bought by Google this year. Rather than the traditional analysis, co-founder Larry Page is said to use the “toothbrush test” – ie. Is this something everyone could use every day to make their lives better?
That is all very noble, but ignores the little question of price. The $19bn that Facebook paid for WhatsApp looks absurd, unless you consider it as adding 10 per cent to the outstanding Facebook stock for an application to replace pricey text messages for a billion consumers.
As Max Nisen at Quartz points out, having voting control (and the paper wealth of a small country) allows the management to pay up for the next toothbrush whatever the outside shareholders think. They might remember that Google’s flotation price looked almost as fanciful as does WhatsApp today, yet those buyers have multiplied their investment 10 times in a decade. So an ounce of instinct may be worth a tonne of analysis. Just don’t tell the bankers.

FT : Equity bulls face slowing share buybacks

Hopes rise that spare cash is now being spent on organic growth

One of the biggest drivers of the US equity bull run has retreated as the S&P 500 ventures further into record territory.
Ultra low interest rates and a paucity of investment choices in recent years has unleashed a tidal wave of share buybacks by S&P 500 companies, notably from the likes of Apple and other big members of the index.

Share buybacks have tallied $1.559tn since the start of 2011 according to S&P Dow Jones Indices. During this period, buybacks peaked during the first quarter of 2014, to the tune of $159.28bn, before slipping to a provisional figure of $120.21bn for the second quarter.
Investors like share buybacks and typically view them as a sign from management that the company’s stock price is cheap. Reducing the amount of outstanding shares helps boost earnings, with around a quarter of buybacks accounting for paying maturing options granted to employees.
A less charitable view is that a big buyback reflects a company with too much cash and lacking good ideas about investing in their business or making a major acquisition.
The boom in buybacks also owes much to the Federal Reserve’s suppression of long term interest rates via quantitative easing and stagnant growth in Europe, an important foreign market for many S&P 500 global companies.
Record low interest rates in the corporate bond market have helped fund large buybacks, but with the central bank on course to conclude buying bonds under QE in October, fuel for buybacks is ebbing and non-financial debt issuance has slowed.
Andrew Lapthorne at Société Générale says companies have exploited the generosity of financial markets to fund their share buybacks and as that fades, the equity bull market faces losing a key source of support.
“The absence of the largest buyers of US equity going forward is likely to have significant consequence on stock prices,” he says.
With the S&P 500 just shy of the 2,000 point threshold and the Fed ending QE, the economics behind buybacks are clearly no longer as compelling.
That in turn raises an important question for equity bulls: what drives prices higher should buybacks retreat further? The best case scenario answer is that we have reached a point in the cycle where companies finally look at spending more of their excess cash on organic growth opportunities and acquisitions now that buybacks are more costly.
Certainly investors are sending that message as stocks extend their gains for the year.
“The attractiveness of Capex and mergers and acquisitions has increased because share prices have gone up,” says Peter Stournaras, portfolio manager at BlackRock.
“The market is rewarding companies investing for growth though Capex and M&A.”
Over the past year, companies buying back their own shares have outperformed other companies issuing shares by some 5 per cent, estimates Vadim Zlotnikov, chief market strategist at AllianceBernstein.
Normally such outperformance over an extended period of time runs around 1 per cent, so clearly the market has rewarded companies buying back their stock over the past year.
A slowing pace of buybacks, however has seen the degree of outperformance over the past three months narrow to 0.7 per cent says Mr Zlotnikov.
All of which underlines the importance of the economy gaining altitude and companies deploying their excess cash into operations and funding acquisitions that can boost revenues in the coming months.
That remains the bull case for equities and such an outcome would alleviate any concern over ebbing buybacks.
A looming danger entails companies being less optimistic about the economy and struggling to significantly boost their top line growth.
For now, the market ignores any comparison with 2007, when third quarter buybacks reached $171.95bn and the S&P 500 rallied into then record territory the following month.
We may well discover that a further reduction in buybacks does not pave room for an extended business cycle and therefore removes a key prop for equities.
Reducing the potency of a major buyer from any market usually means lower prices.

(BFW) Europe Luxury Doesn’t Show Signs of Improvement: Deutsche Bank


Europe Luxury Doesn’t Show Signs of Improvement: Deutsche Bank
2014-08-22 07:47:01.891 GMT


By Heather Burke
Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- European luxury cos. have reported
disappointing 2Q earnings, Deutsche Bank says in note; cuts EPS
ests. by avg. 3%
* Sector still hurt by weak consumer backdrop, especially in
Asia, where brands are investing and/or repositioning
* Sales growth pressure may continue, even as negative FX
slows, doesn’t see much basis for S-T optimism, suggests
“still uninspiring” 3Q
* Wholesale may be one area of improvement in S-T, benefiting
cos. like Hugo Boss
* Hugo Boss raised to buy; disproportionate exposure to
wholesale leaves 2H results more ensured than for rest of
luxury cos. more geared to retail; has strong FCF generation
* Luxottica reiterated buy, exposed to stronger U.S. consumer,
USD, is a leader in attractive industry
* Prada cut to hold, EPS growth may be pressured into 2015,
worsening retail growth in China, Hong Kong may hurt margins

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Heather Burke in London at +44-20-7673-2044 or
hburke2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
James Ludden at +44-20-7673-2645 or
jludden@bloomberg.net

>>> Zmapp Ebola Drug show improvements --> +ve for Allergan

(BFW) Doctors, Nurse Who Got ZMapp Ebola Drug Show Improvement: WHO

--> +ve Alletgan who bought Mapp Pharmaceuticals in 2004

BN 08/21 16:17 *ONE DOCTOR WITH EBOLA REMAINS IN SERIOUS CONDITION: WHO
BN 08/21 16:16 *DOCTORS, NURSE TREATED WITH ZMAPP SHOW MARKED IMPROVEMENT: WHO
BN 08/21 16:16 *TWO DOCTORS, ONE NURSE HAVE RECEIVED ZMAPP FOR EBOLA: WHO

Doctors, Nurse Who Got ZMapp Ebola Drug Show Improvement: WHO
2014-08-21 16:27:52.7 GMT


By Kristen Hallam
Aug. 21 (Bloomberg) -- One doctor and a nurse infected with
Ebola virus show significant improvement, while the second
doctor has improved but remains in serious condition, the World
Health Organization says in stmt, citing clinicians working in
Liberia.
* ZMapp supplies have been exhausted, WHO says, citing
manufacturer
* ZMapp one of several experimental treatments and vaccines
for Ebola that are undergoing investigation
* NOTE: Both U.S. Ebola Patients Are Released From Atlanta
Hospital {NSN NANY3N6KLVRE<Go>}

Link to Company News:{0937176D US <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{TKM CN <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Kristen Hallam at +44-20-7673-2584 or
khallam@bloomberg.net

(BFW) CVC, Advent in Lead to Bid for 50% of UniCredit’s Pioneer: Sole


CVC, Advent in Lead to Bid for 50% of UniCredit’s Pioneer: Sole
2014-08-22 07:09:00.647 GMT


By Elisa Martinuzzi
Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Banco Santander still interested in
acquiring stake in asset manager, Il Sole 24 Ore reports,
without saying how it obtained the information.
* Deal with Santander would be more complicated because
businesses would have to be integrated: Sole
* Offer from CVC, Advent Capital higher than Santander’s: Sole
* UniCredit board to review decision on exclusive talks at
meeting in September: Sole
* NOTE: UniCredit Plans to Keep Big Stake in Pioneer, CEO
Ghizzoni Says NSN N9U6XJ6JTSEM<GO>


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Elisa Martinuzzi in Milan at +39-02-8064-4218 or
emartinuzzi@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Edward Evans at +44-20-3525-3190 or
eevans3@bloomberg.net
Simone Meier

FT : No need for banks in an era of intellectual capital

No need for banks in an era of intellectual capital

Silicon Valley deals are not based on factors that bankers can model, writes Felix Salmon

It is merger season in Silicon Valley. More than $100bn in technology deals were done in the first half of this year alone, according to Mergermarket. The numbers for the second half will probably be even bigger. The year-end tally will include Facebook’s $19bn acquisition of WhatsApp, Oracle’s $5.3bn purchase of Micros Systems and a significant entry from normally deal-shy Apple, which has agreed to buy headphone maker Beats for $3bn.
Amid all of this, one element is missing: bankers. Investment banks are used to earning big fees when corporate clients absorb other companies. But many big deals are being completed without the buyer using any investment bank at all.

This is heartening news for all of us who think that financial services companies in general, and investment banks in particular, are too big and too important. No longer is being an investment banker seen as the best way for a young, talented graduate to make lots of money and achieve great worldly success. Smart kids are moving to San Francisco rather than New York or London. They fund their start-ups with west coast money, build their companies with west coast talent and see multibillion-dollar deals being done between members of their west coast peer group. It makes little sense to turn to an east coast investment banker for “expert” advice on career-defining strategic decisions when there is no reason to believe that expert has a deeper understanding of your industry than you do.
It is no coincidence that the rise of the self-advised mega-merger has coincided with the rise of the California-based venture capital industry as the most important single funding source for technology companies. There are still initial public offerings, of course, and gigantic public companies: Google and Apple have a combined market capitalisation of $1tn. But Silicon Valley, as a rule, does not fund itself in the stock market any more. The flotation of Apple in 1980 and of Microsoft in 1986 came at a time when those companies were investing heavily in developing the Macintosh and Windows systems.
But the 2004 and 2012 IPOs of Google and Facebook did not give those companies money they needed for anything. They already had big cash piles, and have made much more money since. Going public was a way to allow shareholders to cash out, not a means of investing for the future. These days, if a technology company wants to raise money to invest in generating growth, it will call on well-connected venture capitalists who provide more than just cash. Silicon Valley has more than enough money to fund itself in-house. Bankers and capital markets are not the only game in town.

In fact, many technology companies are finding that banks are not even necessary, as The New York Times has reported this week. A Morgan Stanley analyst armed with a beautifully formatted, discounted cash flow projection would not be able to help Mark Zuckerberg, the Facebook chief executive, work out whether Snapchat was worth $1bn or $10bn, or whether WhatsApp was worth $2bn or $20bn. After all, Mr Zuckerberg knows better than anyone how a transaction that looks optimistic today can look like the bargain of the century tomorrow.
Today’s big Silicon Valley deals are not based on corporate synergies, or the amount that earnings per share will increase after the deal closes. They are not, therefore, based on the sort of thing that bankers can model. (Very few of the acquired companies have any earnings at all; some even lack revenues.)
Instead, they are based on attributes that are much harder to quantify. Will this company’s product change the way that billions of people interact? Is it run by the kind of visionary who could prove to be a lethal competitor if she is not brought into the fold today?
In situations such as these, it matters little if the acquiring company overpays. After all, big tech companies have never had more cash than they have today, and they are finding it just as hard to put their money to work as everybody else is. The logic behind Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp, a smartphone messaging platform that is more or less free to use, is simple: capturing a slice of the time people spend on their mobiles matters more than money. It wants to become the dominant technology company of the mobile age. That is not an area where bankers can help. Indeed, they would be harmful, adding an extra layer of meetings and spreadsheets that only serve to dispirit a potential target. Founders do not want to negotiate with bankers: they want to negotiate with fellow founders, such as Larry Page or Mr Zuckerberg.
A banker with gold cufflinks and an expensive suit might be useful if you are interested in buying a public company run by a board of grandees and a hired chief executive. But such deals are now few and far between. In a Silicon Valley devoted to transforming the way we live, bankers have been disrupted: they have gone from being a necessary evil to an unnecessary one. And no one is shedding any tears.

FT : Spectre of ‘lost decade’ haunting Europe

Spectre of ‘lost decade’ haunting Europe

When Nobel Prize-winner Joseph Stiglitz was asked in Germany this week if the country and its neighbours would suffer a lost decade, his response was unequivocal.
“Is Europe going the same way as Japan? Yes,” Mr Stiglitz said in Lindau at a meeting for Nobel Laureates and economics students. “The only way to describe what is going on in some European countries is depression.”

Dire gross domestic product figures, which showed the eurozone’s recovery had stuttered to a halt in the second quarter, and inflation at a four-and-a-half year low of just 0.4 per cent in July have been a stark reminder of the problems befalling the world’s second-largest economic bloc.
Hopes of a meaningful recovery this year have faded, overtaken by concerns that a rise in geopolitical tensions could worsen conditions in the months ahead.
Beyond the latest figures, the big picture is bleaker still. Despite hopes that the worst ravages of the region’s sovereign and banking crises are behind it, the eurozone’s economy remains smaller than it was before the collapse of Lehman Brothers in the autumn of 2008.
With debt burdens worryingly high in parts of the currency area, low inflation and little growth risk causing another crisis. That has bolstered calls for the European Central Bank, facing price pressures of less than a quarter of its target, to embark on broad-based asset purchases immediately.

The ECB has signalled it will not embark on quantitative easing until at least the end of the year, preferring instead to gauge the impact of the package of measures announced in June, which include up to €1tn in cheap loans for the eurozone banks. The central bank further believes its health check of the bloc’s biggest lenders, whose results will be announced in October, will help to boost investor confidence.
The governing council will also hope that signs the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve are beginning to consider raising rates will weaken the single currency, boosting exports and lifting inflation.
But waiting carries risks.
John Llewellyn, of Llewellyn Consulting, said: “QE by the ECB looks almost an inevitability. But it would probably have to be massive. And having left it so late, with low-growth expectations now embedded; with deflation an increasing spectre; and with only a limited availability of financial instruments to buy, the ECB may well have missed the boat.”
Chart
Ken Wattret, economist at BNP Paribas, said: “The longer the inflation rate is allowed to stay so low, and continually approach zero, the smaller the cushion against deflation. Inflation expectations can also suddenly turn into something much more destabilising. The experience in Japan is a warning in both respects.”
Mario Draghi will speak at the Kansas City Federal Reserve’s Jackson Hole’s symposium on Friday. But the ECB president has already insisted that the fate of the currency bloc’s recovery lies in the hands of governments; more monetary stimulus would be of little use unless national politicians make commitments to reform business practices, he said earlier this month.
Though Germany’s downturn is viewed by many as a blip, economists believe the problems in France and Italy, the region’s second and third largest economies, are more persistent.

Neither country has grown at all this year and a tense time in Brussels looks likely in the weeks ahead as leaders ask for leniency on budget deficit target. Berlin has already signalled it will resist their efforts, with Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor, saying on Wednesday in Lindau that it was possible to achieve economic growth and cut spending.
Analysts warn political intransigence and lack of leadership have undermined confidence.
“Policy makers, and most economists, have forgotten the powerful self-fulfilling nature of expectations,” Mr Llewellyn said. “If businesses expect little or no growth in demand, they do not invest in new capacity. Demand remains weak; business expectations are thereby fulfilled; and stagnation results.”
The latest figures on GDP and inflation have also renewed arguments that the structure of monetary union is flawed. While neither the US nor the UK are back to full strength, both of their economies have surpassed their pre-crisis peak. Rather than mirroring its counterparts to the west, the eurozone has begun resembling Japan, which has faced a decade-long struggle to eliminate deflation and stagnant growth.
Chart
Unlike Asia’s second-largest economy, however, where joblessness remained under 5.5 per cent, unemployment in the currency area is 11.6 per cent. If it does come, growth in the months ahead looks set to remain too weak to dent joblessness.
““Europe has very talented people and [if] country after country is not working, it has to be a systemic problem. The basic problem was that it’s not an optimal currency area,” Mr Stiglitz said. “Combining flawed structure with flawed policies has been devastating.”