>>> After Hours : NTWK +18.3%, TRIP +14.1%, CSCO +5.6%, ZU -

After Hours Summary: NTWK +18.3%, TRIP +14.1%, CSCO +5.6%, ZU -21.8%, BIDU -10.3%, PNRA -8.8%, TSLA -3.1% following earnings/guidance

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings: NTWK +18.3%, TRIP +14.1%, CJES +10.6%, STMP +9.7%, HIVE +5.6%, CSCO +5.6%, FEYE +5.4%, NVDA +4%, WFM +2.7%, DL +2.3%, SKX +1.6%, ZEN +1.6%, AUY +1.3%, CRAY +1%, TAL +1%, STB +0.5%, LPSN +0.5%, CVA +0.3%, NU +0.2%, TCX +0.2%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: FXCM +4.9% (announced key operating metrics for January 2015 for its retail and institutional foreign exchange business: Retail customer trading volume of $450 billion in January 2015, 3% higher than December 2014 and 32% higher than January 2014), CRIS +3.7% (disclosed that on February 6, 2015, it entered into a termination and transition agreement with Debiopharm International to terminate the previous License Agreement), JBLU +0.9% (reported traffic in January increased 14.3% Y/Y, on a capacity increase of 15.5%)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings: ZU -21.8%, BIDU -10.3%, PNRA -8.8%, CSOD -6.7%, CAKE -6.6%, NTAP -5.1%, SPRT -4.2%, OII -3.6%, CTLT -3.1%, TSLA -3.1%, EFC -2.9%, DIOD -2.7%, ACHC -2.7%, CTL -2.3%, SCSS -2.1%, NSPH -1.7%, AMAT -1.7%, TSO -1.5%, MATR -1.3%, MKL -0.4%, AEM -0.2%, QDEL -0.1%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: IMMR -3.6% (reported that judge denined HTC's summary judgment argument that it did not infringe two IMMR patents, but invalidated three other IMMR patents in suit on procedural grounds), OESX -3.4% (announced $15 mln proposed public offering of common stock), TTHI -2.0% (commenced an underwritten public offering of common shares, size not disclosed), PBR -1.8% (confirmed that an explosion took place aboard FPSO Cidade de São Mateus today, February 11th, at approximately 12:50 p.m) 

>>> US Close Dow-0,04% S&P-0% Nasdaq+0,28% Russell-0,14%

Closing Market Summary: S&P 500 Spins Its Wheels, Ending Flat

The stock market ended the midweek session on a flat note. The Dow and S&P 500 settled just below their unchanged levels while the Nasdaq Composite (+0.3%) outperformed throughout the session.

Today's final NYSE volume (732 million) came in below average, which has been the case since the start of the week. However, the limited participation was not all that surprising as some investors treaded lightly, trying to avoid potential whiplash associated with headlines out of Europe.

The EU finance ministers meeting took place earlier today, but hopes for a swift deal were dampened by Germany's Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble who said he did not expect a resolution today, echoing comments made by Eurogroup Chief Jeroen Dijsselbloem. The Eurogroup is now expected to spend the weekend analyzing the divergences between the plan presented by Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis and the existing program.

Meanwhile, leaders from France, Germany, Russia, and Ukraine met in Minsk, and according to Ukraine's delegation, they agreed to reaffirm the cease-fire agreement that was struck at the first Minsk conference on September 5, 2014. Last year's agreement was violated shortly after being put into place, and it remains to be seen whether today's reaffirmation enjoys a longer life.

Four of ten sectors registered gains with consumer staples (+0.6%), health care (+0.1%), and technology (+0.4%) showing relative strength throughout the day.

The consumer staples sector settled in the lead thanks to support from PepsiCo (PEP 100.40, +2.41) and Mondelez (MDLZ 36.74, +0.93) after both names reported better than expected results. Meanwhile, the other countercyclical outperformer—health care—benefited from above-consensus results reported by Zoetis (ZTS 45.77, +1.86) and a few others. As for biotechnology, the high-beta group outperformed in the early going, but slumped in afternoon action with the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 317.25, -1.01) shedding 0.3%.

The afternoon underperformance of biotechnology had little impact on the Nasdaq Composite, which received daylong support from Apple (AAPL 124.88, +2.86), which surged 2.3%. In addition, chipmakers displayed relative strength with the PHLX Semiconductor Index climbing 0.3% after ARM Holdings (ARMH 50.31, +1.54) reported in-line results.

On the downside, the energy sector (-0.7%) spent the day in negative territory as crude oil struggled. The energy component held an overnight gain, but slumped to end the pit session lower by 2.4% at $48.87/bbl. The closing price masked the fact that oil tested the $48.25/bbl level after today's storage report revealed a substantial inventory build of 4.868 million barrels.

Elsewhere, the utilities sector lost 2.4% to widen its February loss to 4.9%.

Treasuries vacillated near their flat lines before ending little changed with the 10-yr yield at 2.00%.

Economic data was limited to the MBA Mortgage Index and the Treasury Budget for January:
  • The weekly MBA Mortgage Index fell 9.0% to follow last week's 1.3% increase 
  • The Treasury Budget for January revealed a $18.00 billion deficit while the consensus expected a deficit of $19.00 billion 
Tomorrow, weekly Initial Claims (consensus 285K) and the Retail Sales report for January (consensus -0.4%) will be released at 8:30 ET while the December Business Inventories report (consensus 0.2%) will cross the wires at 10:00 ET.
  • Nasdaq Composite +1.4% YTD 
  • S&P 500 +0.5% YTD 
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +0.2% YTD 
  • Russell 2000 -0.3% YTD

>>> Cisco Systems beats by $0.02, beats on revs; raises quarterly dividend 10.5%

CSCO --> +1,37%

Cisco Systems beats by $0.02, beats on revs; raises quarterly dividend 10.5% to $0.21/share 

Reports Q2 (Jan) earnings of $0.53 per share, $0.02 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.51; revenues rose 7.0% year/year to $11.94 bln vs the $11.8 bln consensus.

Cisco is also announcing that earlier today its Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per common share, a two-cent increase over the previous quarter's dividend, to be paid on April 22, 2015 to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 2, 2015; yield now 3.1%.
T

>>> FireEye beats by $0.11, beats on revs; guides Q1 EPS in-line, revs in-line;

FFEYE --> +2,24%

ireEye beats by $0.11, beats on revs; guides Q1 EPS in-line, revs in-line; guides FY15 EPS in-line, revs in-line 

Reports Q4 (Dec) loss of $0.38 per share, $0.11 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of ($0.49); revenues rose 149.6% year/year to $143 mln vs the $141.45 mln consensus. Q4 billings were $212.6 million, above the previously issued guidance range of $195 to $210 million. Product billings totaled $67.6 million. Deferred revenue totaled $352.5 million at the end of the fourth quarter, an increase of $165 million from the end of the fourth quarter of 2013.
Co issues in-line guidance for Q1, sees EPS of ($0.53) - ($0.49) vs. ($0.53) Capital IQ Consensus Estimate; sees Q1 revs of $118-122 mln vs. $121.14 mln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate. Co sees Q1 Total billings in the range of $130 to $140 million; sees Q1 Gross margin in the range of 69 to 72 percent of total revenue.
Co issues in-line guidance for FY15, sees EPS of ($1.90) - ($1.80) vs. ($1.85) Capital IQ Consensus Estimate; sees FY15 revs of $605-625 mln vs. $622.41 mln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate. FY15 Outlook: Total billings in the range of $800 to $820 million; Gross margin in the range of 71 to 75% of total revenue.

>>> NetApp misses by $0.02, misses on revs; guides Q4 EPS and rev below consensu

NTAP --> -7,1% in after hours

NetApp misses by $0.02, misses on revs; guides Q4 EPS and rev below consensus; adds $2.5 bln to buyback 

Reports Q3 (Jan) earnings of $0.75 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.02 worse than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.77; revenues fell 3.7% year/year to $1.55 bln vs the $1.61 bln consensus.

Co issues downside guidance for Q4, sees EPS of $0.70-0.75, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $0.89 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate; sees Q4 revs of $1.55-1.65 bln vs. $1.69 bln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate.

NetApp increased its stock repurchase program, of which $206 million remained available, by an additional $2.5 billion. The Company plans to repurchase $206 million of its common stock by the end of May 2015. The additional $2.5 billion of repurchases is expected to be completed by the end of May 2018, with the first $1 billion expected to be completed by the end of May 2016.

>>> CARL ICAHN ISSUES LETTER TO TWITTER FOLLOWERS REGARDING APPLE


CARL ICAHN ISSUES LETTER TO TWITTER FOLLOWERS REGARDING APPLE

ALL RECIPIENTS ARE ADVISED TO READ

“IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION”

AT THE END OF THE ATTACHED LETTER

CARL C. ICAHN

767 Fifth Avenue, 47th Floor

New York, New York 10153

February 11, 2015

Dear Twitter Followers:

We were pleased to hear Tim Cook yesterday state publicly: “By and large, my view is, for cash that we don’t need – with some level of buffer – we want to give it back [to shareholders]. It may come across that we are, but we’re not hoarders.” This position with respect to excess cash is great news for shareholders, and we look forward to the capital return program update in April, anticipating it will include a large increase to share repurchases.

On August 13, 2013, when Apple was trading at just $66.77, we originally notified our twitter followers of our conversations with Tim Cook and of our request that Apple take advantage of its excess liquidity by repurchasing its dramatically undervalued shares. Despite significant share appreciation over a relatively short timeframe to $122 per share, we believe the same opportunity exists for Apple today. More recently, skeptics (including bullish Wall Street analysts) questioned our financial model’s forecast for robust growth, disclosed in a letter to Tim Cook on October 9, 2014 in which we again urged Apple to increase share repurchases. Since then, we have gained further confidence in our thesis, increasing the forecasted EPS for FY 2015 in our model from $9.60 to $9.70, and now believe the market should value Apple at $216 per share. This is why we continue to own approximately 53 million shares worth $6.5 billion, and why we have not sold a single share.

With respect to our increased EPS forecast of $9.70, we believe it’s important to note that we assume a 20% tax rate for the purpose of forecasting Apple’s real cash earnings, not the 26.2% “effective” tax rate used by Apple. We consider this an essential adjustment that many analysts and investors simply fail to understand. To further clarify, unlike many companies (including Google), Apple does not state that it plans to permanently reinvest international earnings. Because Apple does not state this, accounting rules require Apple on its income statement to accrue for an income tax on unremitted earnings, but it is a non-cash tax since Apple likely will not repatriate the international cash at today’s tax rate. Therefore, we believe the correct way to treat this non-cash tax for the purpose of valuation is to add it back to earnings, reflected in our EPS forecast. Since our previous letter, the consensus EPS (among the 31 analysts who have updated their EPS targets since January 28th) for FY2015 has dramatically increased to $8.59. Interestingly, if we make the same tax adjustment to this consensus EPS, the adjusted result is $9.31. So, while previously criticized by some of these analysts as being too aggressive, our updated EPS forecast of $9.70 is now only 39 cents above the tax adjusted consensus, and actually below several of the forecasts within that tax adjusted consensus.

When we compare Apple’s P/E ratio to that of the S&P 500 index on the same basis (but without any tax adjustment to the S&P 500 forecasted FY2015 EPS or P/E), we find that the market continues to value Apple at a significantly discounted multiple of only 10x, compared to 17x for the S&P 500:

aapl_1

We believe this P/E multiple discrepancy between Apple and the broad market index is totally irrational. It seems to us the market is somehow missing a very basic principle of valuation: when a company’s future earnings are expected to grow at a much faster rate than that of the S&P 500, the market should value that company at a higher P/E multiple. In FY 2016 and FY 2017 we forecast in our model EPS growth of over 20% per year, and if Apple introduces a TV in FY 2016 as we expect, this EPS growth accelerates to over 31% per year in our model. Because of this, we believe the market should value Apple at a P/E of at least 20x, which together with net cash of $22 per share, would value Apple shares today at $216 per share. This is not a future price target. $216 is what we think Apple is worth TODAY. Also, to the extent Apple introduces a TV in FY 2016 or FY 2017, we believe this 20x multiple is conservative.

aapl2

Given that our estimated value for Apple (excluding the introduction of a television) represents an 84% price appreciation from where the common shares trade today, we continue to hope that Tim Cook and Apple’s Board of Directors, on behalf of all shareholders, take advantage of this dramatic market value anomaly and increase the magnitude and rate of share repurchases while this remarkable opportunity still exists.

It is now plainly obvious to us that there will be no stopping Apple’s peerless innovation track record and best-in-class ecosystem of services, software, and hardware, and that Apple will continue dominating the premium smartphone market by continuing to take premium market share from Google’s Android operating system (and Android-device manufacturers) while at the same time maintaining or growing average selling prices and gross margins. We look forward to the introduction of the Apple Watch in April, as well as the launch of other new products in new categories.

The updated forecast from model is included on the following pages.

Additionally, on October 9, 2014 we wrote a long letter to Tim Cook that expressed our thoughts on Apple in greater detail.

You can find that letter here:

FT : Fiat chief says rebel investors will spur mergers

Fiat chief says rebel investors will spur mergers

Sergio Marchionne, chief executive of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, has predicted that carmakers reluctant to consolidate will be forced to reconsider their stance as they come under attack from activist investors.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Mr Marchionne warned that his rivals could not continue to avoid having a serious debate about mergers.

His comments came as four hedge funds launched a campaign to win a seat on General Motors’ board for Harry Wilson, a key figure in the restructuring of the US car industry, in an effort to force the carmaker to spend $8bn on share buybacks.
“The activists have started targeting carmakers,” Mr Marchionne said in New York. “At first many boards will try to defend themselves with lawyers and bankers, but ultimately they will have to come to the table to discuss a merger with either us or other large competitors.”
Mr Marchionne has repeatedly said the motor industry needs to consolidate to cut operating costs and reduce capital spending on areas such as technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and connected car systems.
This year, the Italian-American carmaker plans to spin off Ferrari, its luxury brand, partly through a stock market listing, and this has raised speculation that Mr Marchionne — known in the industry as a consummate dealmaker — is preparing FCA for another transaction.
The spin-off, combined with stellar vehicle sales in the US and constant speculation about possible deals, has helped FCA’s share price rise almost 50 per cent since the newly merged carmaker listed in October.
“FCA is ready to merge with another major player in the US, Europe or Asia that would make it possible for them to compete globally and cut costs,” said one banker who focuses on industry deals.
Mr Marchionne said he was open to consolidation but stressed that he has not held talks with anyone yet.
One person familiar with Mr Marchionne’s thinking said that his top picks would be a merger with Volkswagen or GM. “They are the only ones who would really be able to stomach it,” the person said.
Tata Motors, the Indian owner of Jaguar Land Rover, would also be a potential candidate for a combination with FCA, the person added. Fiat and Tata Motors were once joint venture partners, and Ratan Tata, former chairman of the Tata group, sat on Fiat’s board until 2012.

FT : Monte Paschi lifts capital increase to €3bn

Monte Paschi lifts capital increase to €3bn

The board of Italy's Monte dei Paschi di Siena, the biggest loser from European regulators stress tests in October, has lifted a proposed capital increase to up to €3bn in what will be its fourth in six years.

In a statement released late on Wednesday, MPS said it had decided to increase the size of its rights issue from €2.5bn "in order to have a capital buffer" as it is required to reach a common equity tier 1 ratio of 10.2 per cent by the European Central Bank, Rachel Sanderson reports from Milan.

The new maximum amount of the rights issue would be backed by a pre-underwriting agreement made up of the same 10 financial institutions that signed up to its previously proposed capital hike.

The bank added it had made a loss of €5.3bn for the full year of 2014 "affected by write downs on its loan portfolio.

>>> Oil price - quick refreshng on history to give some more background to chart

quick point of history regarding ooil and teh reason of the move in 1986...Ukraine situation deterioration & IS situation i n Syria and Irak are our 2014/2015 catalyst...we are talking again of a cold war...

I have been comparing these 2 crisis for a few weeks but a a quick refreshing will amybe make you believe that this not only a chart similarity....Read this quick resume of what happened

We could see oil back areound the $46 level then bounce back to test $60 levels before coming back on the lows...stabilization could come in the next 3 to 4 months....
After the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979 and the surge in oil prices, the overproduction of oil due to the slowdown in the economy has led to a sharp drop in crude oil prices in the first half of the 1980s This period is often referred "oil Rear shock" has seen the price of oil to a minimum of $ 10 in 1986.

This decrease is the result of a political agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia to increase oil production to meet the Western energy needs. Other geopolitical considerations were also taken into account: the fall in oil prices would lead to her lower revenues from the Soviet Union at the time of high export oil, preventing maintain the satellite countries of the block communist.

In the wake of this agreement, most countries in the Middle East and OPEC increased their production in turn. To compensate for the drop in oil prices, they sought to artificially increase production quotas, and for that increased the reported numbers for their reserves pétrole1.

Against the oil shock is so called because it follows the two oil shocks of 1973 and 1979. These two shocks were essentially political reasons: the Yom Kippur War for the first oil crisis, the Iranian revolution and the second oil shock. Therefore, changes in production and oil prices in the years 1970-1980 were mainly driven by international political considerations.

In 2008, after a sharp increase in oil prices since 2003, oil fell sharply again following the 2008 financial crisis, with prices of around $ 40 a barrel. The price of oil went fairly quickly surged to the end of 2010 of about $ 90. However, when we talk about oil against shock, it usually does not refer to the fall of 2008. The geological constraints increase with the inevitable depletion of oil resources, oil extraction costs are bound to increase, resulting long term, considering a constant demand, an increase in hydrocarbon prices.