WSJ : Activist Investors Are Shaking Up Business Schools, Too

Activist Investors Are Shaking Up Business Schools, Too

Investors like William Ackman and Daniel Loeb are amassing influence—and fans—in M.B.A. programs

As a teenager, Christopher Crawford idolized Warren Buffett, poring over the Berkshire Hathaway Inc. leader’s shareholder letters.

Mr. Crawford’s current hero might be more feared than loved. In 2012, the then-25-year-old bought a ticket to the Ira Sohn Investment Conference in New York, where he watched activist investor William Ackman deliver a three-hour presentation arguing that Herbalife Ltd. , a maker of weight-loss shakes and vitamin supplements, was massively overvalued.

Mr. Crawford was hooked. He began following Mr. Ackman’s campaigns, ”reading everything I could get my hands on” and setting up Google alerts on the activist investor, he said. Mr. Crawford later enrolled at Columbia Business School, where he has taken courses such as Applied Securities Analysis and learned to hone investment pitches. He hopes to join a hedge fund when he graduates next year.

“Activism has changed so much about business,” Mr. Crawford said. “Whether you think it’s constructive or not”—and he’s quick to say there are good activists and bad ones—“it’s not going away.”

The swift rise of activist investors such as Mr. Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP and Daniel Loeb’s Third Point LLC has shaken up American businesses, forcing companies to cut fat or change course. Activist ideas are also shaking up business schools, upending class discussions and attracting a new crop of future investors eager to make a name for themselves.

Even students on the corporate track have shifted their career expectations, preparing for a changed landscape where executives are keenly attuned to shareholders’ demands and wary of their muscle, professors and students said.

Rising student interest has professors at Harvard Business School, Columbia Business School and Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, among others, churning out new case studies based on activist campaigns or inviting the major players to campus. And while professors aim to present both management and activist viewpoints, they say more students now embrace the activist outlook.

In 2006, when Harvard Business School professor Robin Greenwood first taught a case study on a 2005 campaign by activists Barry Rosenstein and Carl Icahn against oil-and-gas firm Kerr-McGee Corp., “the overwhelming sentiment in the room was that activist investors were harassing the company and they’re just in it to make a short-term buck,” Mr. Greenwood said.

Now, he said, “a larger portion of students come in with the perspective of the activist,” with students quickly pointing out mismanagement, such as misallocation of resources or underused assets. Subsequent classes have taught case studies about Mr. Icahn and Southeastern Asset Management’s campaign at Dell Inc. and Pershing Square’s efforts at J.C. Penney.

And more students—who might have otherwise pursued more traditional finance roles—are considering careers in activism. As dollars under management by activists have mushroomed to $127.5 billion, according to research firm HRF, so have funds—there are now 73, up from 52 in 2007, with subsequent growth in hiring.

“There are students at Columbia with the singular goal of getting hired by Pershing Square,” said Robert Jackson, a professor at Columbia’s business and law schools.

The fund, whose longtime partner Paul Hilal received his M.B.A. from Columbia in 1992 and sits on the business school’s board, is among the highest-profile activists, with recent wins at Allergan Inc. and Zoetis Inc. It recruits from the school and sponsors an annual contest challenging Columbia students to come up with an activist thesis to improve operations at a public company.

The 2015 winners got a private dinner with Mr. Ackman in May. In the backroom at Maysville, a Southern-inspired restaurant in Manhattan, the students peppered him with questions, and he peppered them back.

“There’s definitely excitement around these guys and what they do,” said Lance Cannon, who graduated from UCLA Anderson School of Management in June. The 33-year-old organized a student outing to Red Mountain Capital Partners LLC, a local small-cap activist hedge fund, in May, during which students asked associates about their career trajectories and how the firm picks its targets. In part, he said, students are lured by the chance to have more of an impact by investing directly in companies.

They are part of a broader shift of young Wall Streeters away from careers in banking and toward areas that offer higher pay and more freedom. New regulations have hampered big banks’ ability to sink their own money into investments—a boon to hedge funds, private-equity shops and venture capitalists looking for talent.

Partly to meet student demand, b-school administrators say they’re inviting more activists to speak on campus. Columbia and Stanford have hosted Mr. Loeb and David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital Inc., respectively. In January, Sally Blount, Kellogg’s dean, hosted Jeff Ubben, chief executive of ValueAct Capital LP and a Kellogg alum, for an interview in front of a packed hall of students.

Critics of activism say these investors chase quick profits and steer companies away from making the necessary investments for the future. In welcoming activists and their ideas, schools are glamorizing what can be a destructive process, said Lynn Stout, professor of corporate and business law at Cornell Law School.

“There’s plenty of evidence to support the view that activism does far more harm than good,” she said.

Still, it appears likely to remain a fixture of corporate life. The number of activist campaigns year-to-date has risen 63% since 2009, according to FactSet, and an influx of investor dollars have enabled activists to take on larger targets.

Activist ideas—chiefly, a focus on maximizing shareholder profits—have found supporters even among students bound for careers as corporate managers.

Matthew Preston, a rising junior at Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business undergraduate program, said he hopes to work at one of the major Wall Street banks, which cater mostly to corporate clients. These firms are increasingly advising companies to be their own activists by staying lean, rooting out waste and taking stock-boosting measures—and prioritizing the bottom line above all else.

“ ‘If I invest in this company, how can I make the biggest returns?’ Whatever career I end up going into, I’ll always have that in the back of my mind,” he said.

Harry Kraemer, professor of strategy at Kellogg, said business schools must prepare aspiring executives to keep a clear head when an activist calls. “There’s nothing to be emotional about,” he said. “Activists are just one more group of constituents you deal with in leading a company.”

(BFW) MORE: Cevian, Investor AB May Set Up Vehicle for ABB Stake: HZ


MORE: Cevian, Investor AB May Set Up Vehicle for ABB Stake: HZ
2015-08-05 13:00:17.108 GMT


By Jan-Henrik Förster
(Bloomberg) -- Cevian, Investor AB may establish investment
vehicle in which they would integrate ABB stakes, Handelszeitung
reports without citing sources.

* Cevian wants to analyse whether ABB is best owner of all of
its business units and whether co. invests in right business
areas
* Such a move wouldn’t exclude a break-up of co., sale of
units
* Cevian said to plan raising ABB stake to 20%
* ABB shares up 2%, had risen as much as 4.4% to 2-week high
on article
* NOTE earlier: Cevian, Wallenberg’s Investor AB Said to Plan
Raising ABB Stake to 20%: HZ



For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Jan-Henrik Förster in Zurich at +41-44-224-4116 or
jforster20@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Jan Schwalbe at +41-44-224-4106 or
jschwalbe6@bloomberg.net

>>> Polo Ralph Lauren beats by $0.10, reports revs in-line; reaffirms FY16 guida

--> RL +3% pre open, still time to go long on this one

Polo Ralph Lauren beats by $0.10, reports revs in-line; reaffirms FY16 guidance; Q1 comps -2% in constant currency

Reports Q1 (Jun) adj earnings of $1.09 per share, $0.10 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.99; revenues fell 5.3% year/year to $1.62 bln vs the $1.61 bln consensus. Consolidated comparable store sales decreased 2% on a constant currency basis during the first quarter and declined 8% on a reported basis.
  • In Q2, co expects consolidated net revenues to be up 3-5% in constant currency, and based on current exchange rates, foreign currency will have an approximate 550 basis point negative impact on revenue growth. The Company continues to expect consolidated net revenues for Fiscal 2016 to increase by mid-single digits in constant currency.
  • Based on current exchange rates, foreign currency will have an approximate 450 basis point negative impact on Fiscal 2016 revenue growth. Operating margin for Fiscal 2016 is still expected to be 180-230 basis points below the prior year's level due to negative foreign currency effects. The full year Fiscal 2016 tax rate is estimated at 30%.

>>> Activision Blizzard: Color on Quarter--> ATVI +7% near $24.40 premarket

Activision Blizzard: Color on Quarter --> ATVI +7% near $24.40 premarket.
  • Stifel notes ATVI reported better-than-expected 2Q results, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.13 (vs. $0.06) which came in ahead of our estimate/consensus/guidance (all $0.07) ~ the favorable variance was largely driven by top line outperformance with revenue at $759 million (vs. Stifel estimate $668 million), and notable strength for digital. 2015 guidance was increased and they thought mgmt was bullish on the upcoming game slate. Overall, this was another strong quarter for Activision Blizzard, Buy.
  • Brean Capital raises their ATVI tgt to $32 from $30. Current trends give them greater confidence in Activision's potential upside. Activision reported upside to 2Q15 guidance and, for the second quarter in a row, raised its full year guidance for net revenue and non-GAAP EPS. They continue to believe that increasing traction for Blizzard's F2P titles, which drove much of the upside to 2Q15, points to the potential for upside to these numbers and an emerging business model which is higher margin and less seasonal despite expectations for lower revenue from World of Warcraft, which has lost 45% of its user base since the start of the year. They note that digital revenue made up 79% of all non-GAAP revenue year-to-date, up from 70% in the prior year.
  • Mizuho raises their ATVI tgt to $31 from $29. This was a clean beat and raise quarter, and they are convinced that there is still conservatism built into the guide. The shining star during the quarter was digital sales which accounted for 81% of total revenue and helped drive record gross margin of 75%. Furthermore, A|B is seeing solid growth in add-on digital sales, which is now the largest and fastest growing component of digital revenue. With several major franchises to come, including a major Destiny expansion, Skylanders, Guitar Hero, Call of Duty, and StarCraft, they remain positive on ATVI shares.
  • Jefferies target raised to $33 from $26