>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up: GERN +20%, LCI +19.7%, CYTX +13.2%, ISR +6.2%, SEAC +4.5%, FMS +4.4%, ASML +2.9%, SUNE +2.9%, TSLA +2.5%, OOMA +2.2%, ARMH +2%, ERIC +1.9%, SNY +1.8%, HAL +1.8%, NVO +1.7%, SWKS +1.7%, AZN +1.5%, FAST +1.5%, MU +1.3%, FIT +1.2%, SLB +1.2%, RIO +1.2%, BABA +1%, ATRO +0.9%, TOT +0.9%, NUE +0.8%, SHPG+0.6%, GPRO +0.5%, OXM +0.5%, CIEN +0.5%

Gapping down: FIVE -8.5%, VRNT -7.1%, CTLT -6.8%, MIND -5.4%, JOY -4.3%, NEOS -3.1%, RLI -2.2%, DV -2.1%, ETH -1.8%, SDRL -1.5%, PLNT -0.8%, HY -0.7%, LE -0.5%

(GS) Global Markets Daily: Bull market interrupted


 

 

Goldman Sachs Global Macro Research

 

Global Markets Daily: Bull market interrupted (Timcenko)


Published September 3, 2015

  • After a mid-August downturn, markets remain unsettled and volatility remains elevated …
  •  
  • … but, over the past year, elevated volatility has been positively correlated with strong forward returns.
  •  
  • The risk of sharp and swift downturns in risky assets remains, fuelled by high equity valuations, elevated rate volatility and questions about forward growth, in particular in China.
  •  
  • As the global cycle enters the Slowdown phase, the frequency of drawdowns may increase, as future prospects become less transparent …
  •  
  • … but, historically, after the initial fall, stocks tend to regain most, sometimes all, of the lost ground within the next 3 to 12 months.
  •  
  • The August equity selloff was one of the swiftest on record …
  •  
  • … with limited low cross-sectional dispersion of returns and limited apparent macro profile.
  •  
  • If equities are to continue to recover, the key is a stabilization of growth.
  •  


1. Market overview

Yesterday, it was the turn of a market uptick: after Tuesday’s sharp losses, the S&P 500 was up 180bp, amid relatively light trading. Oil prices registered a similar rally, with a 180bp gain coming on the heels of the previous day’s very large 770bp slide. The Dollar broadly strengthened as well, and yields in the US sold off a couple of basis points. The VIX index also eased slightly, once again closing below the 30 mark.

Wednesday’s macro data pickings were relatively meager. At 190K, the August ADP National Employment Report was a touch below expectations. The Fed’s Beige Book, an anecdotal summary of business conditions reported by regional banks, was consistent with continuing expansion.

Noteworthy data releases and events over the next few days include Service PMI releases for most major economies, the ECB meeting today and the US non-farm payrolls release on Friday.

2. Bull market interrupted, once again

After a remarkably quiet period earlier this year, the US equity market, alongside other key global markets, has hit some rough waters over the last few weeks. In a period of little more than a week, the S&P 500 and Germany’s DAX indices retreated around 12%, Chinese H-shares fell around 14%, US 10-year yields rallied close to 2%, and oil prices fell sharply to below $30/bbl. Since then, markets have regained some of the lost ground, but volatility remains elevated and daily price seesawing continues. After languishing in the low-teens for the better part of the year, the 'fear factor' index, also known as the VIX, spiked to above 40 during the height of the market downturn and remains elevated. This marked only the seventh episode in its quarter-century history when it has broken the 40 mark, but – at least so far – it did not stay there for more than a single day.

We often refer to these sharp and sudden downturns in the market as 'drawdowns' (see Global Economics Weekly: Equity drawdowns: Bull market interrupted, not the dawn of a new era, July 10, 2013). Drawdowns represent a measure of maximal 'pain' that holding a position inflicts, defined as the most negative peak-to-trough move over a period of time. While it is intimately related to other measures of risk, it more explicitly expresses what stands to be lost when holding a particular position.

Earlier this year, we wrote about an elevated risk of 'drawdowns' (see GOAL: Upgrading credit to Overweight; heightened equity drawdown risk, Mar 27, 2015), fuelled by a confluence of higher rate volatility, high valuations, the Greek crisis and worries about EM growth. Indeed, it appears that one of the main catalysts for the current drop is concern surrounding China growth. While market pullbacks of the magnitude we just witnessed do occur, they are relatively rare outside of recessions, and, as we will outline below, often lead to positive returns in subsequent months. Over the last year in particular, elevated volatility was positively correlated with strong forward returns (see Global Macro Risks in Focus: Risk off moves turning indiscriminate, Aug 25, 2015, Exhibit 14).

3. Drawdowns abound in Slowdown

Over the past 25 years, the median drawdown of the S&P 500 index over a period of one month has been around 3%, and 5.5% over a quarter. Not surprisingly, they are the most common and the most violent during the Contraction phase of the business cycle, when growth is falling at an accelerated pace, and the most benign during the Expansion phase, when growth is positive and sequentially improving.

According to our Global Leading Indicator (see Global Leading Indicator: August Final GLI – Slide into Slowdown, Sep 1, 2015), the global cycle is currently in the Slowdown phase, when global growth is positive but sequentially weakening. When the cycle is in Slowdown, the median drawdown for the S&P 500 during a three-month period is around 5%.

Starting in 1985, there were 31 episodes of the S&P 500 falling by 10% or more during a period of at most two months. (We limited the 'window' over which we look for the worst peak-to-trough performance in order to study forward returns over longer horizons – from one quarter to one year – relative to the registered trough.) Of all of these sharp drawdown episodes, 35% occurred in Slowdowns, 30% in Recovery and Contraction, and only around 5% in Expansion.

Elevated incidence of sharp drawdowns in Slowdown is not coincidental. The Slowdown phase often tends to be 'opaque' and difficult to navigate. Indeed, it has two possible 'exits': one is back to Expansion and a return to strong positive trends, and the other is to extend downturn into Contraction and to result in further market weakness. It is no surprise, then, that significant (that is, worse than 10%) drawdown episodes happen most often during Slowdowns. This is even more exacerbated if we exclude recession periods when negative returns are a norm: outside of recessions, Slowdowns account for 2 out of 5 of 10%-or-worse drawdowns.

4. Once the storm passes, returns tend to improve too

Once the 'worst' of the drawdown is over, prices tend to recover over a period of time that is, for most global equity indices, roughly twice as long as the drawdown period itself lasted. On the face of it, this suggests that a week-long drawdown – more-or-less a period of time we went through in mid-August – will take two weeks to return back to previous levels. But there are some important caveats here. First, the current episode was among the 'fastest' on record – 'black Monday' in 1987, markets drops during the GFC and the European crisis in the summer of 2011 were the only instances when the market gave up 10% or more in less time than now. Second, there is substantial uncertainty around this estimate. And, third, the recovery period tends to get longer for deeper drawdowns. However, in defence of the '1-for-2' rule for the recovery period, it held reasonably well during various 'mini-drawdowns' over the course of last year.

More formally, after a drop of 10% or more in the S&P 500 index, median forward returns tend to become positive. Over all 31 instances of drawdowns we studied, and relative to the market trough, one-month, three-month and one-year forward returns were all positive, with the market returning to pre-drawdown levels between 3 and 12 months after the onset of the drawdown.

5. Current episode: Low dispersion of returns suggests low macro content

A cross-section of asset returns often contains information on the fundamental drivers of market moves, as the 'principal' market driver tends to be correlated with a spread between best-performing and worst-performing assets. The opposite is, however, also true: a lack of asset returns’ dispersion, or an unclear distinction between market winners and losers, suggests a lack of a 'principal' market driver, or an organizing theme that can explain market shifts. This is often the case in sharp 'risk-off' market moves that, while possibly reflecting pent-up pressures, often do not have proximate fundamental catalysts.

The current episode is one such example. Looking both at global equity indices and US equity sectors, the cross-sectional dispersion of equity returns was lower only two other times – once again, during Black Monday and during the European crisis in 2011.

In addition, there is the natural question: what is this episode like? A cross-section of asset returns can offer some suggestions here too: the correlation of returns between different episodes singles out the European crisis from 2011 as the past episode most similar to the recent experience, when the profile of equity returns turned out to be most similar to what we have observed now.

6. Is it over yet?

That, indeed, is the question. Past episodes of drawdowns outside of recession periods and market downturns over the past year suggest that these episodes tend to be relatively short-lived and lead to slow and gradual improvements over subsequent weeks and months. But that is, clearly, conditioned by decent global growth. The global cycle has slowed down over the last three months, and it continues to do so, buffeted among other things by questions about Chinese growth and by the overall softening of fundamental data. Thus, a possible equity recovery after the August squall is strongly linked to the stabilization of the global growth picture.

7. Tactical Trading Views

The following trading ideas from the Global Markets Group reflect shorter-term views, which may differ from the longer-term ‘structural’ positions included in our ‘Top Trades’ list further below.

On Rates:

  1. Stay short 10-year US Treasuries and long 10-year Bunds, opened on 17 Jul 2015 at a spread of 153bp, with a target of 190bp and a stop loss of 130bp, currently trading at 139bp.

8. Recommended Top Trades for 2015

Longer-term structural views are expressed in our Top Trade recommendations. These are typically managed with a wide stop, and assessed on the basis of whether the fundamentals continue to support the medium-term investment theme.

  1. Stay long EUR/$ downside via 1-year 1.00/0.95 put spread (originally at 1.20/1.15 with a premium of 70bp EUR at initiation), expiring on 20 Nov 2015, opened at a spot EUR/$ of 1.253 on 20 Nov 2014, currently at 1.122.
  2. Close constant maturity 10-year US Treasury 3.00-3.50% ‘cap-spread’, funded by selling a corresponding 2.24-1.75% ‘floor spread’ , opened on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential return of 0%.
  3. Close long Dec-2015 Eurostoxx 50 3150/3450 ‘bull’ call spread on 19 Feb 2015, opened at 101.5 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential payout of c1.8-to-1.
  4. Close long risk on the 5-year CDX HY 23 junior mezzanine tranche (the 15-25% portion of the loss distribution) on 6 Apr 2015, opened at 495bp on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential unlevered gain of 5.2%.
  5. Close long basket of EM crude oil importers stock markets, implemented via equal part of TWSE and NIFTY indices (XU030 closed as of 1 Apr 2015), opened at 100 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential loss of 8%.
  6. Close short CHF/SEK on 15 Jan 2015, opened at 7.70 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential loss of 16.5% including carry.
  7. Close short Dec-15 LME Copper futures and long Dec-15 LME Nickel futures on 23 March 2015, for a potential gain of 0.3% on the relative value trade.
  8. Close long USD against a basket of HUF and ZAR on 21 Jan 2015, opened at 100 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential gain of 8% including carry.
  9. Stay long USD against a basket of ZAR and KRW (on a spot basis), opened at 100 on 3 Feb 2015, with a target of 115 (extended from 110) and a stop on a close below 97.5 (raised from 95), currently at 112.8.

 

 
 

 

 

http://t.sidekickopen01.com/e1t/o/5/f18dQhb0S7ks8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9gXrN7sKj6v5dlQxW4XyQDd4WrNJRW5wf5Jx3LvrVvW85mN421k1H6H0?si=5651968104595456&pi=92fce104-79ef-400a-b569-d96c62481100

(ZeroHedge) Russian Military Forces Arrive In Syria, Set Forward Operating Base

While military direct intervention by US, Turkish, and Gulf forces over Syrian soil escalates with every passing day, even as Islamic State forces capture increasingly more sovereign territory, in the central part of the country, the Nusra Front dominant in the northwestern region province of Idlib and the official "rebel" forces in close proximity to Damascus, the biggest question on everyone's lips has been one: would Putin abandon his protege, Syria's president Assad, to western "liberators" in the process ceding control over Syrian territory which for years had been a Russian national interest as it prevented the passage of regional pipelines from Qatar and Saudi Arabia into Europe, in the process eliminating Gazprom's - and Russia's - influence over the continent.
As recently as a month ago, the surprising answer appeared to be an unexpected "yes", as we described in detail in "The End Draws Near For Syria's Assad As Putin's Patience "Wears Thin." Which would make no sense: why would Putin abdicate a carefully cultivated relationship, one which served both sides (Russia exported weapons, provides military support, and in exchange got a right of first and only refusal on any traversing pipelines through Syria) for years, just to take a gamble on an unknown future when the only aggressor was a jihadist spinoff which had been created as byproduct of US intervention in the region with the specific intention of achieving precisely this outcome: overthrowing Assad (see "Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad").
As it turns out, it may all have been just a ruse. Because as Ynet reports, not only has Putin not turned his back on Assad, or Syria, but the Russian reinforcements are well on their way. Reinforcements for what? Why to fight the evil Islamic jihadists from ISIS of course, the same artificially created group of bogeyman that the US, Turkey, and Saudis are all all fighting. In fact, this may be the first world war in which everyone is "fighting" an opponent that everyone knows is a proxy for something else.
According to Ynet, Russian fighter pilots are expected to begin arriving in Syria in the coming days, and will fly their Russian air force fighter jets and attack helicopters against ISIS and rebel-aligned targets within the failing state.
And just like the US and Turkish air forces are supposedly in the region to "eradicate the ISIS threat", there can't be any possible complaints that Russia has also decided to take its fight to the jihadists - even if it is doing so from the territory of what the real goal of US and Turkish intervention is - Syria. After all, it is a free for all against ISIS, right?
From Ynet:


According to Western diplomats, a Russian expeditionary force has already arrived in Syria and set up camp in an Assad-controlled airbase. The base is said to be in area surrounding Damascus, and will serve, for all intents and purposes, as a Russian forward operating base.

In the coming weeks thousands of Russian military personnel are set to touch down in Syria, including advisors, instructors, logistics personnel, technical personnel, members of the aerial protection division, and the pilots who will operate the aircraft.
The Israeli outlet needless adds that while the current makeup of the Russian expeditionary force is still unknown, "there is no doubt that Russian pilots flying combat missions in Syrian skies will definitely change the existing dynamics in the Middle East."
Why certainly: because in one move Putin, who until this moment had been curiously non-commital over Syria's various internal and exteranl wars, just made the one move the puts everyone else in check: with Russian forces in Damascus implicitly supporting and guarding Assad, the western plan instantly falls apart.
It gets better: if what Ynet reports is accurate, Iran's brief tenure as Obama's BFF in the middle east is about to expire:


Western diplomatic sources recently reported that a series of negotiations had been held between the Russians and the Iranians, mainly focusing on ISIS and the threat it poses to the Assad regime. The infamous Iranian Quds Force commander Major General Qasem Soleimani recently visited Moscow in the framework of these talks. As a result the Russians and the Iranians reached a strategic decision: Make any effort necessary to preserve Assad's seat of power, so that Syria may act as a barrier, and prevent the spread of ISIS and Islamist backed militias into the former Soviet Islamic republics.
See: the red herring that is ISIS can be used just as effectively for defensive purposes as for offensive ones. And since the US can't possibly admit the whole situation is one made up farce, it is quite possible that the world will witness its first regional war when everyone is fighting a dummy, proxy enemy which doesn't really exist, when in reality everyone is fighting everyone else!
That said, we look forward to Obama explaining the American people how the US is collaborating with the one mid-east entity that is supporting not only Syria, but now is explicitly backing Putin as well.
It gets better: Ynet adds that "Western diplomatic sources have emphasized that the Obama administration is fully aware of the Russian intent to intervene directly in Syria, but has yet to issue any reaction... The Iranians and the Russians- with the US well aware- have begun the struggle to reequip the Syrian army, which has been left in tatters by the civil war. They intend not only to train Assad's army, but to also equip it. During the entire duration of the civil war, the Russians have consistently sent a weapons supply ship to the Russian held port of Tartus in Syria on a weekly basis. The ships would bring missiles, replacement parts, and different types of ammunition for the Syrian army."
Finally, it appears not only the US military-industrial complex is set to profit from the upcoming war: Russian dockbuilders will also be rewarded:


Arab media outlets have recently published reports that Syria and Russia were looking for an additional port on the Syrian coast, which will serve the Russians in their mission to hasten the pace of the Syrian rearmament.
If all of the above is correct, the situation in the middle-east is set to escalate very rapidly over the next few months, and is likely set to return to the face-off last seen in the summer of 2013 when the US and Russian navies were within earshot of each other, just off the coast of Syria, and only a last minute bungled intervention by Kerry avoided the escalation into all out war. Let's hope Kerry has it in him to make the same mistake twice.

(Exane) ARM Holding : Royalty rate increase is the main growth driver

Royalty rate increase is the main growth driver

No doubt about it, the smartphone market will be weaker than expected. However, higher royalty
rate per chip from migration to 64-Bit / Multicores / big.LITTLE is the main growth driver for ARM,
not unit volumes. The recent sell-off opens a great buying opportunity.

Cutting our smartphone market forecasts
Our Telecom Equipment team has updated its forecasts for the global smartphone market post
Gartner’s Q2 15 update. It now expects a 13% rise in smartphone volumes to 1.4bn units
(previously +15% to 1.48bn) and a modest 6% growth in 2016 to 1.48bn. This essentially translates
the impact of a weaker Chinese market but also a weaker US market in 2016 as lower operator
subsidies will depress the replacement rate.

Fine tuning our model: EPS cut by 4% on 2016 and 3% on 2017
We have cut our 2016–17 EPS to reflect the weaker smartphone market. Importantly, the biggest
hit to smartphone volumes will be at the low end (3G China), where royalties are 3–4x lower than
at the high end. We assume the high-end smartphone market will hold roughly flat this year and so
have made negligible changes at Apple and only minor cuts at Samsung.

Investment thesis unchanged
Despite fears on end-demand, namely in China, we reiterate our view that ARM’s revenue growth
will be driven essentially by 64-Bit migration in 2015–16 and by Octacore in 2016–17. Beyond that,
we see Networking as the most promising and substantial opportunity for ARM and expect it to
constitute the next source of growth. The stock is now trading at 26.3x 2016 EPS; a level not seen
since 2009. We view the sell-off as a great buying opportunity. We have cut our DCF-based TP by
4% to 1,300p and reiterate our Outperform rating.

(UBS) European Auto Suppliers : Continental Upgraded to Buy

European Auto Suppliers - What are the implications of the China slowdown?

* Reducing global production; UBS interactive model on China now available
We reduce our global production forecasts from +1.7% to +0.7% in '15 and from +3.7% to 2.6% in
'16, mainly driven by China. Given the higher level of inventories in July and longer summer breaks, we
expect no H2 production growth in China. We also anticipate the Domestic OEMs will continue to
outperform the JVs near term. We reduce our FY '16 production forecasts from +7% to +5%, with
domestic +10% and JV up +2%. We introduce our interactive model, which looks at 11 global suppliers
and enables us to gauge the impact of production growth (from each Domestic OEMs and JVs) and
currency on the suppliers' organic growth, customer mix, group sales/profitability. We have built in three
scenarios: UBS base case; downside case (domestic OEMs gain share); upside case (JVs regain share).

* The right "recipe": product mix, domestic OEMs exposure and aftermarket
We identify the best positioned suppliers in China as those with 1) strong product mix contribution/high
content value, 2) higher exposure to domestic OEMs and 3) aftermarket. In our downside case, where
China production grows by "only" 2% next year, we estimate the impact on group EBIT will range from
-1/-3% (Valeo, Conti, Autoliv) to -16% (Faurecia) (vs UBS base case). With share prices declining 15-30%
vs peak and assuming no change in multiples, we would need China production to decline c20% this
year and next to reflect a similar impact at the EBIT level, which seems an overly pessimistic outcome, in
our view.

* FX: mostly naturally hedged; main issue is potential impact on German exports
The RMB depreciation should not have a material impact since suppliers are mostly naturally hedged. We
estimate that a 5% RMB devaluation translates into a -1/-2% impact on sales/profitability. However, the
impact on exports from Germany is more worrying (high content value) since c5% of German
production is exported to China.

* Upgrading Conti to Buy; Valeo remains a Top Pick; Faurecia most at risk
We upgrade Conti to Buy on: 1) earnings visibility and resilience, 2) Tires margin staying at high level for
longer, 3) limited China risk (diluted by Rubber exposure), 4) Best-in-class cash conversion. Valeo's share
price has over-reacted, in our view: business model is resilient, organic growth should remain best-inclass
and there is high FCF potential near term. Faurecia appears most at risk of a China slowdown and
there is limited margin momentum left. Autoliv has limited downside risk to China (lower base, high
exposure to Domestic OEMs) but valuation still high given lack of margin momentum.

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 3rd of September 20

>>> Up
*ACERINOX RAISED TO BUY VS HOLD AT JEFFERIES
*ASSA ABLOY RAISED TO BUY VS HOLD AT SOCIETE GENERALE
*ATLAS COPCO RAISED TO BUY AT NORDEA
*AUTOGRILL RAISED TO BUY VS HOLD AT KEPLER CHEUVREUX
*BANKIA RAISED TO NEUTRAL VS UNDERPERFORM AT CREDIT SUISSE (note attached)
*CONTINENTAL AG RAISED TO BUY VS NEUTRAL AT UBS
*FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE RAISED TO BUY VS NEUTRAL AT GOLDMAN
*HERMES RAISED TO OUTPERFORM VS SECTOR PERFORM AT RBC
*MORRISON RAISED TO NEUTRAL VS SELL AT UBS
*RECKITT BENCKISER RAISED TO OVERWEIGHT VS NEUTRAL AT JPMORGAN
*SUBSEA 7 RAISED TO HOLD VS REDUCE AT HSBC
*TALKTALK RAISED TO NEUTRAL AT EXANE BNP PARIBAS
*TOTAL RAISED TO BUY VS NEUTRAL AT ODDO
*VIRGIN MONEY RAISED TO BUY VS HOLD AT INVESTEC

>>> Down
*CGG CUT TO HOLD VS BUY AT HSBC
*EASYJET CUT TO NEUTRAL VS BUY AT UBS
*ENGIE CUT TO UNDERPERFORM VS NEUTRAL AT BOFA
*DRAX CUT TO UNDERPERFORM VS NEUTRAL AT BOFA
*OPTIMAL PAYMENTS RATED NEW BUY AT CITI; PT 400P
*SABADELL CUT TO UNDERPERFORM VS OUTPERFORM AT CREDIT SUISSE (NOte Attached)
*SALZGITTER CUT TO UNDERPERFORM VS HOLD AT JEFFERIES

>>> PT Change
*VIVENDI PT RAISED FROM €20.50 TO €21 AT BARCLAYS ( Note attached)

>>> Initiation
*SENIOR RATED NEW BUY AT BERENBERG; PT 320P
*WIZZ AIR RATED NEW BUY AT UBS, PT 2,200P

>> Call
>> Stock
*AEROFLOT REMOVED FROM GOLDMAN CEEMEA FOCUS LIST
*EUROPCAR ADDED TO GOLDMAN CONVICTION BUY LIST
>> Sector
* European Luxury : Beware of wholesale destocking (Note /attached)
* Consumer : Berenberg September Update (Note /attached)

>>> What to look at today - 3rd of September 2015

Dow+1.82% S&P+1.63% Nasdaq+2.46% Russell+1.48% VIX 26.09 (-16.91%)
US MArket closed higher, after testing the 1,900 suoport yest., market didn't managed to break the 1.50 resistance ahead of tomorrow emplyment report. Chinese market is closed for 2 days for victyory day, this can also helped US to perform. Technology continiue to lead the move with all big gap up between 2.3% and 4.3%...financials continue to trade below market. Crude continue to be very volatile, ending the pit session higher by 1.9% at $46.25/bbl after testing the $43.22/bbl area. WTI crude slumped to lows after the latest inventory report showed a larger than expected build while news that Senate has enough votes to back the Iran nuclear deal also contributed to the brief weakness in oil. Volume were below average. US After Hours SEAC +4.5%, OOMA +2.2%, FIVE -9.5%, VRNT -6.4% following earnings/guidance...GERN+20% on +ve article on drug, LCI +18% to acquire Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals for $1.23 bln; expects the deal to be accretive to adjusted EPS in FY16 in the mid-high single digits and 20-25% in FY17...Asian Market less voaltile on Chinese holidays for commemoration of WWII...Markets are waiting for ECB update & NFP...US financial press report citing sources close to the IMF suggested the FX reform by the PBoC could make the IMF more inclined to include it in the SDR basket. Recall on Aug 19th, IMF board announced it would extend SDR rights basket through Sept of 2016, deferring on the decision for including Yuan until the end of this year. Also of note on the IMF, its report to G20 warned that China slowdown could be larger than expected and is among primary risks to global growth outlook. IMF also called for a "mutual" (coordinated) policy action to raise growth and mitigate risks, specifically asking for assistance from surplus economies such as Germany.

Nikkei +0.69% Hang Seng & Shanghai Closed today & Tomorrow for WW2 comm.

Eur$ 1.1227 CNY 6.3559 JPY 120.45 EURCHF 1.0882 GBP 1.5294 RUB$ 66.7998 WTI $46.12 (-0.28%)

S&P +0.13% (Testing Support levels watch the 1950/1955 levels on the Cash) EuroStoxx +0.53% Dax +0.63% SMI +0.39%

Macro :
- Investors Withdraw Most From U.S. Mutual Funds Since June 2013
- Nikkei Japan Aug. Composite PMI 52.9 vs 51.5 in July
- Draghi Seen Sharpening Language as ECB Fights Fading Inflation
- Pimco Total Return Falls Below $100 Billion, a Third of Peak
- India Rate Cut Now a Question of When, Not If, For Rajan

Keep an eye on :
- ACS SM : ACS Could Claim EU300M From Spain Govt for TP Ferro: Economista
- AGL IM : Unipol Enters FTSE MIB Index, Replacing Autogrill
- AF FP : Air France Considers Entering Low-Cost Long-Haul, Les Echos Says
- ALV GY : Allianz Sees Industrial Insurances Rising, Boersen-Zeitung Says
- ALT FP : Altran 1H Net Income Rises 34%; Sees Profitable Growth for 2015
- BAS GY : For BASF, Huge Potential Liability Emerges Years After Takeover
- BKT SM : Bankinter to Buy Barclays Portugal Retail Unit for About EU100M
- CBK GY : Commerzbank Still Plans to Pay Dividend in 2016: Handelsblatt
- AM FP : France Could Sell Rafale to India, Malaysia Soon: L’Opinion
- EDF FP : Start-Up of Flamanville EPR Reactor Delayed: Le Figaro
- EVE SW : Evolva Planned Rights Offering for 62.4m New Registered Shares
- EVK GY : Institutional Investor Selling 6.99m Evonik Shares, Terms Show
- HEI GY : HeidelbergCement syndicates bridge financing for Italcementi acquisition, completes disposal of lime business in Germany
- III LN : 3I Said in Talks About Strategic Review of Mayborn Group: Sky
- ISS LN : Ontario Teachers Selling 11m ISS Shares in Bookbuild: Terms
- LHN VX : LafargeHolcim to Pay Scrip Dividend of 1 Share for 20 Held
- MGN GY : U.S.-Patent Office Grants Patent for Mologen MGN1703 Therapy
- PGIL LN : Wandle Considering Buying Rest of Polyus Gold for $2.97/Shr
- RIO LN : KKR Interested in Rio Tinto’s Hunter Valley Coal: Australian
- SYNN VX : Syngenta Plans Buyback ($2bil) , Aims to Divest Global Vegetables Seeds
- TRE SM : Two Groups Emerge as Frontrunners for Saudi Aramco Project: DJ
- TIT IM : Vivendi Has Begun Informal Talks With Telecom Italia, CEO Says
- UNI IM : Unipol Enters FTSE MIB Index, Replacing Autogrill
- VIV FP : Vivendi 2Q Sales Beat, Adj. Net Income Misses Ests.
- VIV FP : Bollore to Take Over as Head of Canal+, Les Echos Says
- VIV FP : Apple Music Is ‘Model of the Future’, Universal Music Owner Says
- VIV FP : Vivendi in exclusive talks to become minority partner in Banijay/Zodiak merged entity ( new group will be the world's third largest producer of entertainment programming)
- YOOX IM : Net-a-Porter’s Founder Massenet Said to Quit Online Retailer

>>> Syngenta to sell vegetable seeds business and repurchase shares

Syngenta to sell vegetable seeds business and repurchase shares
Syngenta [NYSE:SYT], the Swiss agribusiness company, announced plans to divest its vegetable seeds business and launch a share repurchase program, according to a September 3 company statement.

The main points from the release break down as follows:

Syngenta has announced its intention to divest its global vegetables seeds business. This business has a significant global footprint and a wide array of best-in-class varieties. As such, it is expected to attract significant third-party interest.

The company also announced its intention to return significant levels of capital to shareholders through a share repurchase program. The initial program of more than USD 2bn will commence in the coming weeks. This will be in addition to the progressive dividend policy which the company has followed for several years.

Michel Demaré, Chairman, said: “The Board and management are determined to accelerate shareholder value creation and our actions today underpin our commitment to do so. Our commitment is also shown by the significant capital return program that we announced today.”

Mike Mack, Chief Executive Officer, said: “By demonstrating and unlocking the inherent worth of our leading global seeds portfolio we can create significant additional value. I look forward to updating shareholders in the coming months on progress, including providing further visibility on the underlying profitability of our portfolio of assets.

“We continue to make excellent progress with our AOL program which, together with our clear intent to drive margin improvement across the business, underpins our confidence in our 2018 margin target of 24-26%. For 2015 we reiterate the full year guidance that we outlined in July.”

(BN) For BASF, Huge Potential Liability Emerges Years After Takeover


For BASF, Huge Potential Liability Emerges Years After Takeover
2015-09-03 04:00:01.11 GMT


By Jef Feeley and David Voreacos
(Bloomberg) -- When BASF SE acquired Engelhard Corp. nine
years ago for $5 billion, executives unknowingly inherited a
ticking legal time bomb.
It all began decades ago over the seemingly mundane
industrial product talc, used in everything from wallboards to
handling auto tires on the factory line.
In 1983, Engelhard quietly settled a lawsuit after its
officials testified in depositions that talc produced by a
company mine contained cancer-causing asbestos. All evidence was
sealed and Engelhard and its law firm repeatedly said in
subsequent lawsuits spanning more than two decades that the
company’s talc was asbestos-free.
It wasn’t until 2009, after BASF assumed Engelhard’s
liabilities, that another picture began to emerge. A former
Engelhard scientist testifying in a lawsuit filed by his own
daughter said he was told that “asbestos in trace amounts was
found in talc,” and the company’s legal department “told us to
purge our records” relating to the mine. A co-worker testified
about test results in the 1970s showing the presence of asbestos
in the talc.
Those revelations pulled back the curtain after a quarter
century, setting off a fight over what Engelhard knew about its
talc, how its lawyers may have acted and whether thousands of
people around the U.S. should have the right to reopen or bring
new lawsuits, this time against BASF, for asbestos illnesses. It
also raises fundamental questions about whether justice is
possible if companies and lawyers hide evidence in civil
litigation.
“This has really opened a Pandora’s Box,” said Tom Bevan, a
lawyer in Boston Heights, Ohio, who represented hundreds of
people who sued Engelhard in the 1990s and is involved in a
current federal case against BASF. “I wouldn’t want to be a BASF
shareholder right now with potentially billions of dollars in
liability coming down the pike because of the lies of a company
it bought.”

Distance Itself

BASF, based in Ludwigshafen, Germany, faces about 300
lawsuits related to the talc. The company, which is the world’s
largest chemical maker and had $74.3 billion in revenue last
year, has tried to distance itself from the alleged behavior of
Engelhard and its former law firm, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers say as many as 10,000 potential cases
related to Engelhard’s talc could be reopened.
The company, which hasn’t disclosed any cost estimates over
talc-related asbestos cases, disputes Bevan’s assessment of
possible damages. “This is baseless speculation by plaintiffs’
lawyers,” spokeswoman Robin Rotenberg said in a statement. “As a
matter of policy, BASF does not speculate” on potential
liabilities.
Cahill spokeswoman Lynn Tellefsen declined to comment and
the firm said in a federal lawsuit that it behaved properly.
BASF replaced the firm in 2010.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers and legal experts vary in their
estimates of potential damages against BASF. “There’s no
question in my mind that it might cost BASF billions of dollars
to put these cases behind them,” said Erik Gordon, a University
of Michigan law professor. Others aren’t so sure. While Jonathan
George, an attorney at Waters, Kraus & Paul, which has sued the
company, said “there is potential substantial liability by
BASF,” he contends billions of dollars is “unrealistic.”
One case, which seeks class-action status, claims Engelhard
and Cahill engaged in fraud and fraudulent concealment by lying
about the talc, while hiding and destroying evidence. The
company and law firm have consistently denied wrongdoing in
court papers.
Another case, pending in state court in New Jersey, seeks
to force BASF to produce dozens of documents about the talc that
the company maintains are confidential.
The company “has not found that exposure to Engelhard’s
talc caused injury due to asbestos contamination,” Rotenberg
said.

Recent Litigation

BASF has said in recent litigation that some asbestos
existed in Engelhard’s talc but denied it caused injuries. The
talc was used in wall board, joint compound and auto body
filler. Tires workers used it to help grip products. But did
they inhale asbestos that came from Engelhard’s mine? BASF says
that will be hard to prove. The company also says it will be
hard to convince a judge to accept a class action.
“Plaintiffs face serious obstacles in attempting to certify
a class based on events that took place in thousands of
different asbestos cases litigated in different courts and at
different points in time by different lawyers,” BASF lawyers
said in a May 4 court filing.
Former workers blame Engelhard’s talc for ailments ranging
from mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos, to lung
ailments. The average mesothelioma case is worth about $4
million, says Mark Lanier, a veteran Texas plaintiffs’ lawyer
who has tried more than 50 asbestos cases. Asbestos settlements
may ultimately cost corporations and insurers more than $265
billion, according to the Rand Institute, a non-profit research
group.

Dying Daughter

BASF first had to defend the litigation practices of
Engelhard and Cahill in 2009, when Donna Paduano sued in state
court in New Jersey over her mesothelioma. Paduano, who never
worked at Engelhard, claimed she was exposed to asbestos from
her father’s clothes or visits to his workplace.
A deposition by her father, former Engelhard scientist
David Swanson, triggered an investigation by lawyers who
uncovered test results showing the presence of asbestos in
Engelhard talc more than 25 years earlier. Paduano has since
died, as has Swanson, who had lung cancer but took no legal
action. Swanson’s testimony stunned Paduano’s lawyer,
Christopher Placitella.
“It was the first time any of us had heard” the company
knew its product contained asbestos, he said. “I was afraid that
this guy would turn out to be a nut and that my whole case would
go down the toilet.”
Instead, BASF settled the lawsuit with Paduano’s family
before her death, and Placitella began a years-long quest to
understand what Engelhard and Cahill did and what evidence they
may have hidden or destroyed.
The coverup began, Placitella claims, after a lawsuit filed
in 1979 blamed the mesothelioma death of a tire worker on
Engelhard talc. Engelhard settled in 1983 and the pre-trial
evidence, including testing that showed varying levels of
asbestos from a Vermont mine that the company ran since 1967,
was sealed -- a common practice in corporate litigation.

‘Document Retrieval’

The company closed the mine in 1983 and later issued a memo
entitled, “DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL -- DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS,”
instructing Engelhard staff to collect documents for discard
relating to several companies, including the talc mine’s
operator. The memo said the company would retain copies of
“documents to be preserved.”
In recent years, BASF and its new law firm, Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, have “expended an extraordinary amount of resources
to locate Engelhard documents -- including those maintained in a
warehouse by Cahill -- to find former Engelhard employees and to
learn the facts about the Engelhard legacy talc operations,”
BASF’s Rotenberg said. They provided “tens of thousands of
relevant documents” to plaintiffs’ lawyers, she said.
At the same time, BASF is opposing an application for
class-action status filed by the survivors of six people who
died of asbestos-related disease. And it’s fighting cases by
workers who claim that an auto-body filling compound they used
exposed them to asbestos from Engelhard’s talc. In a personal
injury case that ended in mistrial when the plaintiff died in
2013, BASF lawyers said that no Engelhard mine worker ever got
ill from the company’s asbestos.
Placitella filed a federal lawsuit in New Jersey against
BASF on behalf of six plaintiffs. Should the case receive class-
action status, he says he intends to share evidence of the
alleged cover-up with thousands of victims who may move to
reopen their asbestos cases in state courts ranging from
Pennsylvania to Kentucky. Those plaintiffs had previously sued,
but their cases were either thrown out or settled for nominal
sums.
A federal judge initially dismissed Placitella’s case on
procedural grounds, but in a reversal last year, a three-judge
appellate panel in Philadelphia revived his fraud and fraudulent
concealment claims.
In reinstating most of the plaintiffs’ claims, the panel
didn’t rule on the merits of the case, returning it to U.S.
district court for further proceedings. But it also spelled out
its disdain for the sort of conduct described in the complaint.
If indeed “they rigged the game from the beginning,” the
judges said, “how then can calculated false and misleading
statements serve the truth-seeking function of the litigation?
According to the complaint, BASF and Cahill were not
mischaracterizing the facts; they were creating them.”

For Related News and Information:
Top Stories:TOP
Bloomberg legal resources: BLAW
BASF earnings graph: BAS GY <Equity> FA ISBAR
BASF cash flow: BAS GY <Equity> FA CF

To contact the reporters on this story:
Jef Feeley in Wilmington, Delaware at +1-302-661-7616 or
jfeeley@bloomberg.net;
David Voreacos in federal court in Newark, New Jersey, at
+1-212-617-0768 or
dvoreacos@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
David Glovin at +1-212-617-4455 or
dglovin@bloomberg.net
Rick Schine, Heather Smith