FT : Hedge funds run by women outperform

Hedge funds run by women outperform
But fewer than one in 20 alternative managers employ a female portfolio manager


High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our T&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

Hedge funds run by women have outperformed a broader benchmark of alternative investment managers over the past five years, raising fresh questions about why there are so few female portfolio managers.

The HFRI Women index has returned 4.4 per cent over the past five years, compared with a 4.2 per cent return for the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite index, a broader gauge of hedge funds across all strategies and genders.

The figures support research by Rothstein Kass, the accounting firm, in 2012 and earlier academic studies that found hedge funds run by women outperform those managed by men.

Nonetheless the number of women in the industry remains small, with fewer than one in 20 hedge funds employing a female portfolio manager, according to a 2015 study by Boston’s Northeastern University.

By contrast, one in five mutual funds employ a female portfolio manager, according to Morningstar, the data provider.

Jane Buchan, chief executive of Paamco, a $24bn fund of hedge funds, said the lack of female hedge fund managers stems from the problems women face when trying to raise money from investors.

She said: “Women [hedge fund managers] have substantially less assets. That is a real issue, and it is not a performance issue. It is hard to win the money.”

“To get that same [level of assets as a man], you have to [outperform by] 200 basis points.”
KPMG, the accounting firm that acquired Rothstein Kass in 2014, last year found 79 per cent of US hedge fund professionals believe it is harder for women to attract capital from investors than for their male counterparts.

The disparity between the number of men and women working in the industry is one of the highest in finance, the Northeastern study found. It found that only 439 hedge funds employ a female portfolio manager, compared with 9,081 that employ a male investment manager.

When expanded to include women in marketing, compliance and administration roles, female representation at hedge fund companies rose to 21.5 per cent.

Because it is harder for women to raise assets when they do branch out on their own, the funds that thrive are ones that tend to outperform, according to the Northeastern research, which was published last year in the Review of Financial Economics.

Although the latest statistics indicate female hedge fund managers outperform over the long term, last year they underperformed the broader hedge fund index significantly. The HFRI Women index was up 2.2 per cent last year, compared with a 5.5 per cent return for the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite index.

Few new funds run by women are springing up. One exception is Margate Capital, run by Samantha Greenberg, a Paulson & Co alumna, which has raised about $200m after launching late last year.

Systematica, the quantitative hedge fund run by Leda Braga, was spun out from Mike Platt’s BlueCrest Capital in January 2015. It has accumulated $10bn of assets since launch, becoming one of the largest hedge funds in the world headed by a woman.

>>> Week End News : 11/03/2017 - 11h

- AIG US : Berkshire Hathaway Should Consider Buying AIG: KBW 
- AKZA NA : Akzo Nobel Mobilizes Politicians to Prevent PPG Takeover: FD
- CVRS US : Corindus Rises Post-Mkt as Philips Reports 15.5% Stake in 13D
- DBK GY : Investigate Deutsche Bank’s Russian Ties: House Fin Cmte Dems
- DWNI GY : Vonovia CFO Kirsten Sees No New Merger With Deutsche Wohnen: BZ
- GE US : General Electric Jumps Amid Speculation About Activism
- TEF SM : Telefonica Weighs Possible Deal W/ Liberty in U.K.: Expansion
- VOLVB SS : Cevian Capital Raises Volvo Stake by Buying 1m A-Shares: DI

Barron's Article on Airbus, Peugeot & Norwegian Cruise Line ...all positive

Barron's : Peugeot Turned to M&A to Drive Earnings Growth

Peugeot Turned to M&A to Drive Earnings Growth
By acquiring Opel and Vauxhall from General Motors, the French car maker could become No. 2 in Europe behind Volkswagen.

Car maker Peugeot ’s audacious acquisition of General Motors ’ loss-making European brands looks set to extend the increasingly smooth ride the French company’s shareholders have enjoyed lately.
Peugeot’s (ticker: UG.France) agreement to buy Opel and Vauxhall from GM (GM) is a relatively small deal financially, but strategically smart. It means Peugeot will now overtake local rival Renault (RNO.France) to become Europe’s second-biggest car manufacturer behind Volkswagen (VOW.Germany), with a 17% market share.
That may be personally satisfying for Peugeot CEO Carlos Tavares, who resigned as Renault’s chief operating officer over three years ago after publicly voicing concerns that he might never replace Carlos Ghosn at the helm.
Last week’s GM deal marks a remarkable turnaround in Peugeot’s fortunes since Tavares took over. The car company came close to collapse in 2014 and needed a three billion euro ($3.16 billion) cash injection from China’s Dongfeng Motor Group(0489.Hong Kong) and French taxpayers. Tavares reduced Peugeot’s product range and lifted margins by capping costs, particularly for research and development and salaries. It returned to profitability in 2015 after four consecutive years of losses.

Cost cuts and improved pricing also underpinned Peugeot’s solid earnings growth in 2016. Last month it said full-year net profit almost doubled to €1.73 billion from €899 million and declared its first dividend since 2011.
Its shares have risen 35% in the past year and are up more than 25% over three months. They added 2.7% on the day the GM deal was announced.
Tavares’ rationalizing prowess will be key to making the GM deal work. The U.S. company’s European brands have racked up billions in losses in recent years and haven’t turned a profit since the 1990s.
Peugeot will pay €1.3 billion in cash and shares for Opel and Vauxhall, brands that generated €17.7 billion in revenue in 2016. To assuage political concerns in Germany and France—both of which are preparing for elections this year—Tavares promised to lift earnings without job cuts or factory closures.
The deal offers substantial economies of scale and savings from purchasing, manufacturing, and R&D. It should generate annual synergies of €1.7 billion by 2026, with a large portion of that coming before 2020. That would give Opel and Vauxhall a recurring operating margin of 2% by 2020 and 6% by 2026, Peugeot reckons.
Gerrit Smit, who manages the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund, says Peugeot has acquired GM’s European business at a knock-down price. “The clear fact is that Peugeot is buying a business that [GM] tried for years to nurse and grow. They haven’t succeeded and are, you could say, a forced seller.”
He says that for relatively little cost, Peugeot has acquired extensive infrastructure, strong brands, and good products. “Clearly, they will have to put a lot of energy and management into it as well, but they couldn’t have wished for a better price,” Smit says.
He notes that structural issues have driven much of the surge in European M&A since the beginning of the year and will likely fuel more consolidation in the auto sector.
“The structural issues for autos include the push toward electric vehicles, driverless cars, and car-sharing that present them with the problem of how to survive in an uncertain industry,” Smit says. “The Peugeot deal is all part of that process of trying to cut costs to be able to survive and grow.”
UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GM DEAL, Peugeot isn’t taking on debt and won’t initially have to pay royalties for GM’s intellectual property. Nor will it be liable for Opel’s net pension obligations, something analysts estimated could have left the French company on the hook for up to $10 billion.
Deutsche Bank analyst Gaetan Toulemonde has Peugeot at a Buy with a €22 price target, about 12% higher than its current value.
Toulemonde says that under Tavares’ stewardship, Peugeot’s operating profit margin rose 900 basis points (nine percentage points) to 6% last year, from minus 2.8% in 2013. “One third of the improvement, or 300 basis points, is attributable to pricing discipline and two thirds is attributable to cost savings, including labor costs. The recovery of Opel should be comparable,” he says.
He reckons that Peugeot’s operating margin targets are conservative, and that if 65% of its proposed synergies are achieved by 2021, the margin could be close to 6% in 2021 rather than the 2026 deadline given by the company.
“Managing four mass-market brands will be challenging. However, increasing its size by 50% gives Peugeot economies of scale, something the group is lacking today,” he says. “And since the acquisition price looks reasonable, it can give the group a great earnings driver for the next few years.”

Barron's : Airbus CEO Tom Enders Has a Flight Plan for Growth

Airbus CEO Tom Enders Has a Flight Plan for Growth
The European aircraft giant is benefiting from popular new planes like the A320neo.

Thomas Enders, chief executive of European aircraft giant Airbus, turned a boyhood obsession with airplanes into a fulfilling career and a thrill-seeking pastime. When he’s not skydiving, the German-born Enders, 58, loves to hang out with test pilots taking the company’s “new toys” for a spin. Test pilots, he says, “really embody the spirit of aviation today.”

Airbus (ticker: AIR.France) offers all the toys Enders could wish for. Based in Toulouse, France, the company is best known for its roster of Airbus commercial jetliners, sold to airlines worldwide. It also makes helicopters, fighter planes such as the Eurofighter Typhoon, and launchers for Ariane space rockets. Airbus reported total sales of 67 billion euros ($70.8 billion) last year.
Since taking the controls on June 1, 2012, when Airbus was still known as European Aeronautic Defence and Space, or EADS, Enders has skillfully engineered much-needed governance changes to reduce the political influence of France, Germany, and Spain, which together own 26% of the stock. He has also presided over a closer integration of Airbus’ corporate structure and workforce, creating what he calls a “truly European company.”
But Enders, a major in the German army reserves, isn’t ready to stop. He wants to build on Airbus’ presence in the Asia-Pacific region, North America, and Europe. “The next prize is to become truly international,” says the CEO, who keeps in a corner of his office three shovels commemorating groundbreakings on new manufacturing facilities, including an assembly line in Mobile, Ala.
Airbus approaches this challenge on a solid footing. It had a backlog of 6,874 aircraft at the end of 2016, worth more than $1 trillion, versus a backlog of 5,715 for Boeing (BA), valued at $416 billion. For Airbus, which delivered 688 planes last year, that’s almost 10 years of production at the current rate. “This company has never had, in its history, such a competitive portfolio,” Enders says.
AIRBUS SHARES, which closed on Friday at €70.06, have tripled in value in the past five years as scheduled passenger traffic has climbed in the recovery from the global financial crisis, forcing carriers to renew or add to their fleets. Airlines worldwide are forecast to carry almost four billion passengers this year, up from three billion in 2012.
The shares trade for 20 times 2017 estimated earnings and 15 times 2018’s projected figure. Boeing fetches 18 times consensus estimates for next year.
Airbus is expected to earn €2.63 billion this year, or €3.50 a share, rising to €4.64 a share in 2018. Cash flow likewise is projected to increase by double digits, as the company puts behind it problems that hampered production of popular, fuel-efficient aircraft last year.
Reported earnings fell 62% in 2016, to €1.29 a share, due to unfavorable currency effects and €2.2 billion in charges for the A400M military transport aircraft. Airbus is being penalized by European governments, its A400M customers, for late deliveries and insufficient “military functionalities” on the planes it has delivered, including a shortage of critical chips for the self-protection system.
The latest charge prompted Airbus to seek a deal that would cap its exposure. “We need to de-risk the A400M program,” Enders told analysts in February.
THE WUNDERKIND of the Airbus family is the A320neo (“neo” stands for new engine option), a single-aisle, narrow-body jetliner that can carry 186 passengers and offer fuel savings of up to 20% compared with previous versions. Airbus has booked more than 5,000 orders for the A320neo family of aircraft since its launch in 2010, making it the fastest-selling commercial-aircraft family in history.
Boeing was caught off guard by the A320neo’s success. It had planned to replace the 737 by 2030, but pressure from customers compelled it to launch its own fuel-efficient model, the 737 MAX.
The Airbus A350, a medium- to long-range wide-body jet that can accommodate up to 440 passengers, also is gaining traction. But the A320neo and the A350 both encountered production problems in 2016. United Technologies ’ (UTX) Pratt & Whitney unit, an engine supplier for the A320, struggled to meet delivery targets for its geared turbofan engine. At the same time, a contractor providing cabin interiors for the A350 couldn’t keep pace with demand.

“We have thousands of suppliers,” says Enders. “It is inevitable that some suppliers will face challenges. It doesn’t help when you are in a critical situation to just beat up on suppliers, or insist on contract. You can only increase the ramp-up if your supply chain can follow.” He notes that Airbus has tried to help suppliers that faced issues.
In addition to the A400M, Enders’ other big headache looks to be the A380, a double-decker, wide-body plane powered by four engines and designed to carry more than 500 passengers. It is a big hit with travelers—fan-produced Websites and blogs laud its comforts and amenities—but high operating costs mean that orders have been hard to land. Only 208 A380s have been delivered since the model entered service in 2007, and 109 are in the order backlog.
Ninety-three A380 planes, or half of those flying, are operated by United Arab Emirates-based carrier Emirates; the airline has 49 remaining in the order book. The list price of an A380 is $436.9 million.
Airbus last year said it planned to scale back A380 production, but Enders says the company is committed to the plane even though it isn’t suitable for every carrier. “You need to fill these aircraft,” he says. “If you fill it 80% or more, it is a money-making machine. We are hanging tough with the A380.”
AIRBUS WAS CONCEIVED in the late 1960s by European aerospace executives, who considered a joint development and production program the most effective way to combat U.S. dominance of the industry. The company’s first project was the A300, a short- to medium-range twin-engine aircraft. Plans were drawn up to share the work, bringing the parts together for assembly, with France building the cockpit and control systems; Britain, the wings; Germany, the forward and rear fuselage; and the Netherlands, moving wing parts such as flaps and spoilers. Spain, which joined the group later, built the horizontal tail plane.
Today, Airbus competes chiefly against Boeing, a rivalry that Enders considers fierce and “mostly not unfair.” For more than 20 years, Boeing and Airbus have been feuding over state subsidies each manufacturer receives, with the World Trade Organization adjudicating disputes. Each side has scored victories; in the latest ruling, the WTO ordered the U.S. last year to withdraw tax benefits extended to Boeing related to the production of the 777X. Boeing argues that European government assistance has unfairly enabled Airbus to capture half of the global airplane market.
“Frankly, we need Boeing to drive our competitiveness,” Enders says. “If one of us was way ahead of the other, I don’t think that would be good for our products or for the airline industry that we serve.”
Disruption of the duopoly might not be far off, however. Enders foresees a challenge from a Chinese competitor in the next 10 years, at least in the market for single-aisle planes. That could help to explain why he has been so keen since becoming CEO to reduce Airbus’ reliance on commercial aircraft, which generate more than 70% of revenue.
Just months after taking office, Enders launched a bid to merge Airbus, then EADS, with Britain’s BAE Systems (BA.UK) in a deal that would have created the world’s largest aerospace and defense company. Negotiations were sunk by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who questioned sales projections and feared that Germany would be marginalized as an EADS owner. It’s a rare instance of Enders being outmaneuvered.

The upheaval prompted questions about Enders’ suitability to lead the company, but also paved the way for him to push for changes to reduce government meddling. The gambit paid off. In 2013, the French and German governments agreed to retain equal stakes of up to 12% (they currently hold 11% each) and restrict their influence to certain matters of national security. They have no decision-making role at Airbus. Previously, France owned 15%, similar to the interest held by Germany’s Daimler Aerospace, or DASA, a proxy for the state. Spain controls 4%.
OVERCOMING MISTRUST among European neighbors has been a major challenge for Enders and his predecessors. “Everything between the French and Germans can easily be political,” he says. “They have a mantra on both sides of the Rhine—balance. They say it must be balanced.”
Until 2007, he notes, the company had two chairmen and two CEOs, because the French and German governments insisted on having leaders with passports from both nations. “That was ridiculous,” Enders says.
Enders’ announcement in 2012 that Airbus would move its headquarters from Paris and Munich to Toulouse also riled German politicians, but he stuck to the plan. “The headquarters should be where the main activity is, and that is Toulouse,” he says.
The move made life more complicated for Enders, whose family lives near Munich. He maintains an apartment in Toulouse and commutes to his home in southern Germany on weekends. The son of a shepherd, he describes himself as a country boy.

IN THE PAST FOUR YEARS, Enders has taken steps to streamline the business and rebrand it: EADS became Airbus Group and, more recently, just Airbus. The space and defense divisions have been combined, and the corporate headquarters has been merged with the commercial-jet unit. “Merging the largest division fully with the corporate structure should make us leaner, accelerate decision making, and reduce structural costs,” Enders says.
Outsiders laud Enders’ drive to consolidate Airbus, which could also help the company cope better with rapid technological changes. “He was instrumental in changing the way the company works,” says Bernstein analyst Douglas S. Harned. “He did a lot to turn it into a more economic and shareholder-driven company.”
Enders joined Deutsche (later Daimler) Aerospace in 1991 following a couple of years in the German defense ministry. He rose to head of corporate strategy, and was at the forefront of preparations to unite DASA with its French and Spanish counterparts as one company in 2000. He was appointed CEO of the defense and security systems division in the new entity, and co-CEO of the whole company in 2005. Following governance changes in 2007, he was put in charge of the commercial-aircraft business, a position he held for five years until becoming CEO.
Enders learned to fly helicopters about a decade ago. “I figured I should try to learn to fly at least one of these machines that we are building,” he says.
Nowadays, he pilots a helicopter about twice a month and indulges his passion for skydiving about 20 times a year. Even so, he sounds envious of one of his sons, who jumps about 200 times a year. All four of Enders’ sons have connections to the aviation industry.
“There is a famous saying among skydivers: Once you leave an airplane, you are dead—until you do something about it,” Enders says.

Barron's : Norwegian Cruise Line Stock Could Rise 20%

Norwegian Cruise Line Stock Could Rise 20%
The company’s shares should sail ahead, aided by a growing fleet and cruising’s expanding popularity

Investors in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings shouldn’t give up the ship. The company’s shares may have badly trailed its competitors’ in the past year, but its outlook is improving.
As of late last week, Norwegian’s stock (ticker: NCLH) had returned 5% over the past 12 months, compared with 24% for Carnival (CCL) and 39% for Royal Caribbean Cruises (RCL).
Weaker 2016 bookings on European cruises after a series of high-profile terrorist attacks on the Continent hurt the company. Initially guiding to earnings of $5 a share for 2017, Norwegian had to ratchet down its forecast. The consensus now calls for $3.83—still considerably higher than last year’s $3.41.

The stock seems to be making up some ground with encouraging 2017 booking trends in Europe and the Mediterranean, in particular, and strong fourth-quarter results. “We have more passengers on the books and higher prices than we’ve ever had before,” CEO Frank Del Rio told Barron’s.
Europe, which accounts for about 25% of the cruise outfit’s revenue, is a crucial market for Norwegian. More so than Carnival and Royal, it relies heavily on U.S. travelers for those cruises, and they tend to spend more on profitable amenities like day excursions than European customers do.
However, “we’re seeing a sharp recovery in travel demand for Europe,” wrote Daniel McKenzie, an analyst at the Buckingham Research Group, last month. He raised his price target on the stock to $63 from $60, following the company’s good fourth-quarter results. That’s 26% above the shares’ recent quote of about $50.

The company earned 56 cents a share in the fourth quarter, versus 51 cents a year earlier, on a 8% revenue gain to $1.13 billion. Still, the stock sports the cheapest valuation of the big three cruise operators, trading at 13 times this year’s profit estimate. That’s below Carnival’s P/E of 15.7 times and Royal Caribbean’s 13.6. Yet Norwegian Cruise Line offers superior yields—essentially the revenue for available berths over a specific period—the youngest fleet, and faster growth than they do. Its return on invested capital was 9.7% last year, up from 8.1% in 2014.
Mark Finn, portfolio manager of the T. Rowe Price Value fund, which owns the shares, sees Norwegian Cruise Line as a good value.
“In a market where it’s harder to find things, being patient with a consumer-discretionary name that has had some struggles, but seems to be getting back on course, is a good place to be,” he says.
THE SMALLEST OF THE THREE major U.S. cruise operators, Norwegian operates 24 ships, versus Carnival’s 102 and Royal’s 49. It runs three units; the largest uses the parent company’s name, has 14 vessels, and accounts for some 85% of the company’s total capacity.

This unit offers traditional cruises, often popular with families, with an average customer age of 55. One of the brand’s popular features is freestyle cruising, which gives customers flexibility as to where and when they can dine on the ship. This contrasts with the traditional approach, in which meals typically are served at designated times.
THE COMPANY, headquartered in Miami, also operates two higher-end brands, Oceania Cruises (premium) and Regent Seven Seas Cruises (luxury). Norwegian got them in 2014 when it acquired Prestige Cruises International from Apollo Global Management (APO) for about $3 billion. Cruises on these lines use smaller ships and tend to last longer, often well over a week. Their average customers are in their late 60s.
To secure the deal, which diversified its portfolio, Norwegian Cruise Line had to assume a lot of debt, but it has been whittling that down. As of Dec. 31, debt amounted to about 60% of capital, not an unreasonable percentage. What’s more, the company, which doesn’t pay a dividend, is considering returning more capital to shareholders, possibly this year.
Norwegian’s relatively nimble size, compared with its big competitors, does have advantages. When it adds the Norwegian Joy to the China market this summer, the vessel, which can hold 3,900 guests, will account for roughly 8% of the cruise line’s overall capacity. So a new route, assuming it’s successful, can move the revenue dial for the company more than it can for its larger rivals.
SOME INVESTORS WORRY that the China cruise market, which Norwegian was late to enter, is too cluttered. But Del Rio calls China, the world’s most populous nation and the “next great frontier in cruising.” The Norwegian Joy is one of the first ships custom-built for that market; it has amenities such as gambling onboard.
Norwegian plans to boost its capacity at an annual clip of about 8% through 2020, ahead of the industry’s roughly 5% pace—a plan that some skeptics consider too aggressive. But the cruise company, which is expanding off a smaller base than its competitors, wants to add about one ship a year. That looks manageable. Del Rio asserts that he is “very confident this is a very reasonable pace of new-ship additions.”
The expansion comes at a time when cruise industry fundamentals look sound, with so many baby boomers retiring. Industrywide, the passenger base grew at a 4.5% annual clip from 2009 to 2015, going to 23.2 million from 17.8 million. Expansion is expected to continue at a similar pace this year, according to Cruise Lines International Association, a trade group.
Another promising market is Cuba, partly because of its proximity to Miami, Port Canaveral, and other Florida ports.
“Cuba is tailor-made for the cruise industry,” says Del Rio, a native of that country. His company plans 41 cruises to the island nation this year, the first of which docked in Havana on March 9. Bookings for the initial 10 sailings have commanded “meaningful” premium prices, he adds.
If Norwegian’s overall business continues to firm up, its stock should sail ahead.

>>> US Close Dow +0.21% S&P+0.33% Nasdaq +0.39% Russell +0.38%


Closing Market Summary: Traders Appear OK With March Rate Hike

A rate hike at next week's FOMC meeting appears to be a mere formality following the better than expected Employment Situation Report for February, which crossed the wires early Friday morning. That seemed to be alright with investors as they pushed the major averages higher to finish a slightly disappointing week on a positive note. The Nasdaq (+0.4%) led the modest advance with the S&P 500 (+0.3%) and the Dow (+0.2%) closing just a step behind. For the week, the benchmark S&P 500 lost 0.4%.

The CME Fed Watch Tool now assigns an implied probability of 93.0%, up from 88.6% on Thursday, to a rate hike at the March 14-15 FOMC meeting after the February jobs report showed that nonfarm payrolls increased by 235,000 (consensus 188,000) and average hourly earnings rose 0.2% (consensus +0.2%). The Federal Reserve will announce its decision on Wednesday at 2:00 pm ET.

Crude oil continued to command investors' attention again on Friday, falling 1.5%. The day's tumble left the energy component 8.8% lower since Wednesday's bearish EIA inventory report, which showed record high U.S. inventories. WTI crude finished the Friday session at $48.49/bbl.

All things considered, the energy sector (-0.1%) held up relatively well, finishing the day near its flat line. Real estate (-0.2%) was the only space to post a wider decline.

Conversely, at the top of the leaderboard, the industrials (+0.7%), utilities (+0.8%), and telecom services (+0.7%) spaces settled with solid gains. The top-weighted technology sector (+0.5%) also outperformed as chipmakers finished Friday's session with notable gains; the PHLX Semiconductor Index closed higher by 1.2%.

Retailers provided the consumer discretionary space (+0.1%) with some support, advancing the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT 42.14, +0.31) higher by 0.7% in the wake of Ulta Beauty's (ULTA 286.42, +12.65) most recent earnings report. The company added 4.6% after reporting better than expected top and bottom lines, but it wasn't enough to keep the consumer discretionary sector from underperforming as restaurants weighed.

In the Treasury market, U.S. sovereign debt saw an uptick in buying interest following the release of the February jobs report. The benchmark 10-yr yield closed three basis points lower at 2.58%.

On a related note, the U.S. Dollar Index (101.22, -0.76) finished solidly lower, losing 0.8% in Friday's session.

Friday's economic data included the Employment Situation Report for February and the February Treasury Budget:

  • February nonfarm payrolls came in at 235,000 while the consensus expected a reading of 188,000. The prior month's reading was revised to 238,000 from 227,000. Nonfarm private payrolls added 227,000 while the consensus expected an increase of 185,000. The unemployment rate decreased to 4.7% (consensus 4.7%). Average hourly earnings increased 0.2% (consensus +0.2%), while the previous month's reading was revised to 0.2% (from +0.1%). The average workweek was reported at 34.4, which is in line with the consensus. The previous month's reading was left unrevised at 34.4.
    • Average hourly earnings increased 0.2%, leaving them up 2.8% year-over-year and solidifying the prevailing belief that the Federal Reserve will raise the target range for the fed funds rate at its March 14-15 FOMC meeting. That is the key takeaway from this report, followed closely by the encouraging understanding that the labor market is strengthening, which is aiding the prospects for stronger economic growth.
  • The Treasury Budget for February showed a deficit of $192.0 billion versus a deficit of $192.6 billion for February 2016. The Treasury Budget data is not seasonally adjusted, so the February deficit cannot be compared to the $51.3 billion deficit registered in January.

Investors will not receive any economic data on Monday.

  • Nasdaq Composite +8.9% YTD
  • S&P 500 +6.0% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +5.8% YTD
  • Russell 2000 +0.6% YTD

>>> Energy Closing Prices


Energy Closing Prices

  • April Crude Oil futures fell $0.75 (-1.5%) to $48.49/barrel
  • April Natural Gas closed $0.04 higher (+1.4%) at $3.01/MMBtu
  • April RBOB Gasoline closed $0.02 lower (-1.2%) at $1.6/gallon
  • April Heating oil futures closed flat at $1.53/gallon

(BFW) *GILEAD SAID CLOSE TO PULLING TRIGGER ON INCYTE: (full)

Gilead (Nasdaq: GILD) is close to an agreement to acquire Delaware-based biopharmaceutical company Incyte (Nasdaq: INCY), according to a person claiming to have knowledge of the matter. Talks are said to be at an advanced stage but specifics on timing and price weren't mentioned.
Gilead, based in California, has been under intense pressure from investors to find a way to convert its multi-billion cash hoard into growth, but recent efforts have fallen flat.



Amid criticism from some investors and Wall Street analysts, management at Gilead acknowledged on its fourth quarter conference call that growth would be challenging over the next couple of years without some sort of acquisition, stoking speculation about a takeover of Incyte or another biotech. But in some circles patience has worn thin.
While Gilead has contemplated its next move, Incyte hasn't gotten any cheaper. Shares of the oncology-focused company are up 40% this year alone and it has continued to climb, making fresh highs near $140 per share in recent days.
Incyte's lead asset is Jakafi, an approved drug for treatment of patients with several types of rare blood cancers and the first FDA-approved janus associated kinases (JAK) inhibitor for any indication. Trial results from Gilead’s developmental JAK compound, momelotibib, have been disappointing in comparison.
Representatives for Gilead said it doesn't comment on speculation about M&A. Incyte did not respond to requests to comment on the rumor.