>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up

Earnings/guidance:
MU +11.8%
Other news:
  • GSAT +25.2% (trading higher in early trade; hearing reports that the company's revised proposal may be supported by at least three FCC members)
  • PBMD +22.5% (Announced interim data from the AIPAC Phase IIb clinical trial for IMP321 in metastatic breast cancer; initial data confirms previous trial results showing IMP321 is safe and well tolerated)
  • XOMA +14% (ticking higher, detailed several corporate actions to further streamline its operations; CEO replaced, license agreements signed that have the potential to generate up to $22 mln in revenues, workforce reduced)
  • CVRR +12% (higher following report that President-Elect Donald Trump is said to be near naming Carl Icahn as a special advisor on overhauling federal regulations
  • ANY +8.3% (Cyrus Capital affirms 28.3% active stake, sends letter to the Board calling on the company to implement a restructuring plan)
  • NVS +0.9% (signs a licensing agreement with Sunovion Pharmaceuticals for the US commercial rights to its three treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; terms not disclosed)
  • STM +0.7% (positive read-through from MU earnings)
  • AMD +0.7% (positive read-through from MU earnings)
Analyst actions: SCMP +1.2% (upgraded to Buy at Mizuho; tgt $16)

>>> Weight Watchers shares higher by 5% pre-market following news that Oprah has

Weight Watchers shares higher by 5% pre-market following news that Oprah has lost 40 lbs using the product

Oprah Reveals She’s Lost ‘Over 40 Lbs.’ on Weight Watchers in New Ad — See It Here!

Oprah is down more than 40 lbs.!

The media guru is celebrating her weight loss success in the first of two new ads for Weight Watchers, shared with PEOPLE.

“Since I’ve started Weight Watchers, I’ve lost over 40 lbs.,” Winfrey, 62, says in the ad. “I can honestly tell you, I struggle no more.”

Not only can she can still eat her favorite food — bread — the program allows her to indulge in other treats that would typically be off-limit on a diet.

“I’m eating everything I love — tacos, pasta. I’ve never felt deprived,” she says.
Winfrey, who is a Weight Watchers shareholder, said that the program is less of a diet, and more of a life change.

“Weight Watchers is easier than any other program I’ve ever been on,” she said in a press release shared with PEOPLE. “It’s a lifestyle, a way of eating and a way of living that’s so freeing. You never feel like you are on a diet and it works.”

“I would say to anyone who’s thinking of joining Weight Watchers: Take the leap. And get about the business of enjoying a fantastic and full life,” Winfrey says in the commercial.

She’ll share some of her favorite, Weight Watchers-friendly recipes in her new cookbook Food, Health and Happiness, out on Jan. 3, along with deeply personal stories about her weight loss journey.

Since joining Weight Watchers in August 2015, Oprah has been steadily dropping pounds. By January 2016, she had lost 26 lbs. through healthy eating. She also kicked up her exercise routine, vowing in May to log at least 10,000 steps a day.

“I try to do something every day that allows me to feel active, and I don’t make myself crazy about it,” she told PEOPLE. “I just know that movement and flexibility, particularly the older you get, is what makes you feel alive. So I don’t want to just be alive, I want to feel it.”

>>> US Early pre-market gappers:

Early pre-market gappers:
Gapping up:GSAT +25.2%, PBMD +22.5%, MU +11.8%, RGSE +11.5%, ANY +8.3%, HTBX +4.0%, GLF +2.6%, SCMP +1.2%, PWE +1.1%, GOLD +0.9%, NVS +0.9%, LPL +0.9%, BTE +0.8%, STM +0.7%, AMD +0.7%.
Gapping down:RHT -11.0%, SBGL -3.9%, FINL -3.8%, CETV -3.6%, BBBY -3.4%,FRED -3.2%, AU -2.6%, MBT -2.4%, SGY -2.4%, VALE -2.2%, VALE.P -2.0%,SMFG -1.5%, TWTR -1.3%, BABA -1.3%, RIO -1.1%, BBL -1.1%, TEF -1.1%, WLL -1.1%

Le Figaro : Plaidoyer pour un Etat-actionnaire enfin efficace

FIGAROVOX/TRIBUNE - François Fillon a annoncé qu'il plaidait pour une relance des privatisations. Pour François-Joseph Fürry et Olivier Saez, il faut surtout créer un véritable fonds souverain français répondant à des objectifs clarifiés.
«L'État est un mauvais actionnaire» déclarait avec fracas il y a peu Alain Juppé. Le thème, pourtant, est resté cruellement absent des débats, au-delà de la dénonciation consensuelle des tragédies industrielles qui en résultent. On peut espérer que les candidats déclarés à la magistrature suprême ne laisseront pas en jachère un champ trop longtemps délaissé, et s'attaqueront rapidement aux causes profondes d'une telle impéritie. Si Arnaud Montebourg avait annoncé en 2014 vouloir établir une doctrine rigoureuse d'investissement, le projet est resté lettre morte. Coupable abandon, tant on dénombre aujourd'hui les conséquences dommageables du vide que l'inadéquation des structures et le manque de courage politique ont laissé se créer. Dommageables pour les intérêts des sociétés bien sûr. Mais au-delà, pour les intérêts des contribuables français qui sont les ultimes bailleurs de fonds, les actionnaires de ce qui devrait être un Fonds Souverain à la française, aux objectifs clarifiés, à la doctrine rigoureusement précisée, et au portefeuille resserré.

Les revenus de ces investissements (près de 6,3 milliards d'euros en 2015) auraient vocation à être affectés au réinvestissement productif créateur d'emplois.

Une analyse succincte des participations de l'État suffit à identifier les racines de son impotence en matière d'investissement:
● Dispersion de la puissance d'investissement de l'État au sein de plusieurs structures, d'abord: l'Agence des participations de l'État (APE), la Banque publique d'investissement (BPI) ou la Caisse des dépôts et consignation (CDC) se partagent des positions parfois co-détenues, et gérées, par des équipes différentes. Ce, au lieu d'assurer une voix unifiée, ou à tout le moins une répartition nette des responsabilités. La création de la BPI a amorcé un processus de regroupement qu'il est urgent d'achever. Ce, d'autant que la Cour des comptes a récemment pointé la fragilité d'un mode de financement reposant sur un endettement à taux historiquement bas.
● Émiettement du portefeuille, ensuite. On dénombre près de 80 participations cotées, et une myriade de participations non-cotées. Corollaire inévitable: 75% des investissements côtés sont des participations de moins de 15% du capital... d'où une voix fortement diluée de l'État qui, à trop vouloir agir, dilue ses moyens au risque de ne pouvoir faire prévaloir les intérêts du pays, et de se cantonner à un rôle défensif. La grande majorité des investissements, minoritaires, de la BPI dans des sociétés non cotées soulève la même question. Au point qu'on est en droit de douter de l'influence réelle de l'État réduit à un bailleur de fonds si minoritaire.
● Fragmentation sectorielle, enfin. Au-delà d'une surpondération de l'énergie, peu opportune tant par son exposition à la chute récente du prix des hydrocarbures que par les erreurs stratégiques des sociétés concernées, l'État est aujourd'hui investi dans tous les secteurs économiques. On peut s'interroger sur la pertinence de ce déploiement tous azimuts, au lieu d'une concentration sur les secteurs réellement stratégiques (aéronautique, armement…), ou faisant l'objet de monopole naturel assumé par l'État. Partant, la dispersion du portefeuille dans des secteurs matures et libéralisés à l'échelle européenne appelle assurément une profonde refondation. L'État doit enfin définir ce qu'est un secteur stratégique légitimant une implication capitalistique à long long terme, sauf à perpétuer d'interminables conflits d'intérêts, comme régulateur, actionnaire, corps de recours administratif…
On est en droit de s'interroger sur les conséquences de cette dispersion. Sur les 18 derniers mois, la valeur du portefeuille côté de l'APE était de 83 milliards d'euros au 30 avril 2015 - il est aujourd'hui de 58 milliards d'euros (cette différence n'est pas ajustée des modifications du périmètre du portefeuille de l'État entre les deux dates). Au-delà du contexte de marché, structurellement volatil, on peut s'interroger sur l'efficacité du contrôle exercé sur les décisions des dirigeants des sociétés détenues par les Français. L'utilisation des revenus de ces investissements (près de 6,3 milliards d'euros en 2015) mérite également un traitement urgent. Finançant historiquement une maigre partie du déficit structurel d'un État insatiable, on a présenté comme une vertu l'allocation partielle au remboursement de la dette en 2015. Or, ces revenus, ponctuels, auraient vocation à être affectés au réinvestissement productif créateur d'emplois. Ils ne serviraient ainsi plus d'aisé palliatif aux réformes structurelles et à une réduction du coût de fonctionnement de l'État. Et permettraient un dynamisme nouveau du portefeuille public. Un véritable fonds stratégique en somme, visionnaire, recentré, et autonome en ressources.
L'angoisse du déclassement, de la perte de souveraineté semblent s'affirmer comme des thèmes majeurs de la campagne présidentielle. Y répondre passera aussi par une refonte des priorités de l'État actionnaire. Source potentielle d'un regain effectif de souveraineté économique et stratégique, élément-clé de notre investissement sur l'avenir du pays.

(MS) 2017 US Food Outlook : Against the Wind

We remain In-Line for 2017, with optimism on tax reform and consolidation offsetting yield headwinds and the challenge of delivering on an increasingly ambitious margin outlook. We continue to prefer advantaged margin + consolidation stories, and see the greatest upside at KHC, MDLZ, CAG, and APFH.

KHC and the Near-Term Consolidation Outlook
We expect Kraft Heinz (KHC) to reaffirm its position as the lead consolidator in the
fragmented US Food industry in 2017, with smaller players such as ConAgra (CAG)
likely to play important secondary roles. Despite a wave of large-scale consolidation in
recent years, the US Food industry remains fragmented relative to similarly mature
industries such as beverages and tobacco. In recent years Kraft Heinz has taken
advantage of this opportunity, leveraging its proven integration and cost reduction
capabilities and peer-leading access to capital, emerging as the industry’s logical
consolidator. Since acquiring Heinz in June 2013 and Kraft in July 2015, 3G has achieved a
combined ~$2.3 Bn in cost savings, representing ~9% of combined net sales, and – as
with its multi-year involvement in the beer industry – appears to be only in the earlymiddle
innings of a longer-term consolidation strategy.
As outlined below, we believe the phase of large-scale industry consolidation could
occur as early as 1H17. However, in the near term we would expect the market to remain
focused on a wide range of potential outcomes, providing at least temporary downside
support for valuations across the group. In addition, looking beyond the KHC nexus, we
expect CAG to leverage its balance sheet flexibility (~1.5x net debt / EBITDA), with an
initial focus on transformative and highly synergistic transactions which could enhance
the company’s growth and earnings. We have no knowledge of any pending
transactions, and to our knowledge the companies have not commented.
Potential policy changes under the Trump administration could also contribute to nearterm
M&A dynamics. As detailed elsewhere in this note, we see a high likelihood of
material changes to US corporate tax code, which could include measures such as (i)
lowering the corporate tax rate from 35% to 20-25%; (ii) Eliminating interest deductions;
(iii) Allowing a cash repatriation holiday; (iv) The potential for border tax adjustments
which could favor domestic manufacturing of goods (although we view this as a
measure less likely to be implemented) and (iv) Higher interest rates (due to higher
inflation from fiscal stimulus). We see these potential changes as somewhat mixed from
an M&A standpoint, as potential changes in corporate tax rates or interest withholding
(if only prospective) could incentivize the pursuit of near-term M&A, as could
expectations of further rate increases. However, we also view the uncertainty around
this issue as a potential hurdle in M&A negotiations, which could be augmented by a
lack of clarity on interest deduction.
Near term, KHC has already completed the primary integration milestones, and should
fall below 3.5x leverage in early 2017. In addition to having already completed the key
integration milestones for Kraft Heinz (SAP harmonization and organizational
restructuring), we estimate the balance sheet should fall below 3.5x leverage in early
2017, positioning the company for another transformative transaction. Our current
understanding of debt markets suggest KHC could maintain its investment grade rating
at 5.0x leverage in an acquisition scenario, consistent with the 5.0x+ leverage of ABI
followings the SAB acquisition.

Utilizing capital contributions from 3G/Berkshire, we believe Kraft Heinz will be in the
23
position to perform a transformative transaction while maintaining its existing majority
ownership. We would also expect 3G/Berkshire to structure any potential transaction so
that the cooperative maintains majority voting, the same practice utilized in the beer
industry. We believe this can be accomplished across all of the potential acquisitions
discussed in press reports, assuming an outside capital contribution from the
cooperative. Recall Reuters reported that 3G was said to have begun raising up to $10
Bn for a new fund in mid-November (3G Capital Raising Up to $10 Billion for Takeover,
Blog Says), just as it did prior to the Kraft Foods acquisition (Brazilian Billionaire Trio
Reportedly Sets Up new Fund, Possibly To Acquire All-American Brand Cocal-Cola). It is
also worth mentioning there is nothing that precludes 3G/Berkshire from diverging from
either company's current proportionate ownership, meaning Berkshire could
theoretically contribute capital in excess of the $10 Bn raised by 3G (or less, of course).
A variety of acquisition candidates have been actively discussed in the media, most of
which have been part of the debate since the 2012 Heinz acquisition. The Kraft
acquisition in July 2015 did little to alter the debate around the next potential
acquisition, which have consistently included Campbell, General Mills, and Kellogg
(Forbes, Bloomberg, Bloomberg), while MDLZ is a more recent addition as reported in
the media. Based on discussions with the company, we believe KHC's acquisition
guideposts include brands with dominant category positioning, potential for
international expansion, and attractive post-synergy valuation. We believe each of the
companies mentioned in the media provide these guideposts in varying degrees, and use
these criteria to guide our own interpretation of KHC's most likely next target. We
reiterate that we have no knowledge of any pending transactions, and have looked at
all of the hypothetical combinations below based only on widely disseminated media
reports.

FT : UK commercial property borrowing costs rise

UK commercial property borrowing costs rise
Britain’s vote to leave the EU adds to bank concerns about risk in sector

The cost of borrowing against UK commercial property has risen this year after two years of decline, as Britain’s vote to leave the EU added to banks’ concerns about risk in the sector.

According to the first data on commercial property loans released since the Brexit vote in June, pricing rose by an average of 24 basis points in the six months to September, reaching rates last seen in 2013 and early 2014. The rates charged for riskier loans rose particularly quickly.

Emma Huepfl, co-principal at Laxfield Capital, an investment management firm that produced the data, said that banks had “slowed down over the past 12 months”, offering alternative lenders a chance to step in and offer more expensive debt. “Debt funds and institutional lenders have been quite opportunistic,” she said.

The figures also show a steep drop in overall lending: requests for loans secured against London assets in the period were 46 per cent below the long-term average at £57m, while development lending dropped 25 per cent from a year earlier to £1.5bn.

This was partly because of lower demand, as potential property buyers and developers held back from big deals around the time of the EU vote, and also because of a more conservative approach by lenders, Ms Huepfl said.

“There was a period where there was a lot of uncertainty around valuations, and pricing moved up, particularly in more difficult areas of the market.

“There was a hiatus in the [loan] syndication market and the German lenders also had a pause, but they have come back very strongly in the last few weeks. Core pricing is now being reset and re-established.”

Riskier lending particularly suffered: deals with loan-to-value ratios of 70 per cent or more dropped by almost two-thirds, from £2.4bn to £900m.

One sector had a spike in activity: lending linked to purchases of buildings worth less than £50m. This was boosted by a series of sales by funds available to retail investors, which rushed to withdraw money after the EU referendum, forcing the funds to sell properties. Deals involving these buildings were more than double the previous two-year average, at £1.7bn.

Laxfield monitors formal requests for loans as they are submitted to lenders, including banks, insurance companies and private equity groups, capturing about half of all loans and offering an indicator of fresh trends.

The shifts in the lending landscape follow a warning from the Bank of England that commercial property still posed risks to financial stability, despite having steadied after the initial shock of the UK’s vote to leave the EU.

The Bank’s Financial Policy Committee “agreed that there was the risk of further adjustment in the sector”, according to records of meetings released this month. “This could create financial stability risks, given the reliance of the market in recent years on inflows of foreign capital, and given that valuations in some segments of the market continued to appear stretched.

“An adjustment could result in a tightening of credit conditions by reducing the ability of companies that use [commercial property] as collateral to access finance,” the Bank said.

Le Point : What is the purpose of the shareholder state?

What is the purpose of the shareholder state? http://bit.ly/2hVNLTK
With 90 billion euros of participation in companies, the shareholder state has a significant power in France. Too important ? Tribune.

If two characteristics were to be chosen which truly distinguished the French economy from other Western countries, we would cite the very high level of public expenditure and the presence of the State in the capital of many enterprises in the competitive sector. These two combined features make that France is far from a liberal economy.
French public spending

When public spending is about 57% of GDP, 13 percentage points more than the Germany - our main partner in Europe - and that percentage has been increasing for 35 years at least, we measure the degree of socialization Of our economy. Why not after all if this is the choice of the French?
It should be remembered, however, that former President Giscard d'Estaing estimated that, beyond the threshold of 40%, there was a change in the "socialist society". It was a long time ago. Although it is not formally demonstrated that such a level of public expenditure is a handicap for our economy, one can nevertheless think that this peculiarity weighs on its dynamism and its competitiveness insofar as all these expenses are not always justified or bear growth, as it regularly stresses the Court of Auditors .
Even President Hollande in his press conference at the time of the vows for 2014 denounced a state "too heavy, too slow, too expensive" and committed to a plan of savings of 50 billion euros. Nevertheless, the Court of Auditors doubted as early as 2015 the realization of this plan of economy. Its president, Didier Migaud , stated: "We do not see a lot of spending cuts of measures taken in 2015 and that will have effect in 2016 and 2017. In contrast, we see a lot of spending increases that will affect the Years. Thus goes public expenditure in France.
The weight of the state

The second characteristic of our economy is the weight of the state on the decisions of industrial and commercial enterprises. This pressure is exerted notably through its shareholdings in the capital of many companies in the competitive sector.
The armed arm of these interventions is the State Participation Agency (APE), created in 2004, and placed under the supervision of the Minister of the Economy and Finance. As stated on its website : "The agency of state holdings embodies the State shareholder, investor in the equity deemed strategic by the state companies to stabilize their capital or support them in their development or Their transformation. "
More specifically, Article 2 of the decree establishing the EPA stipulates that 'the Agency shall, in liaison with the ministries concerned, examine the main investment and financing programs of undertakings and Acquisition or sale, commercial agreement or cooperation and research and development. It proposes to the Minister for the Economy the position of the State shareholder on these matters and implements it. "
"Strategic" holdings?

This is the wide scope of its mission in the companies that benefit from its support. There are many entities within the scope of the EPA (there are 81 in 2015) and varied. For some, it is permissible to question their "strategic" character.
The portfolio of state holdings. © DR Agency of State shareholdings.

It must be said that this characteristic is sufficiently elastic to allow any tricolor company to be classified as strategic whenever reference is made to economic patriotism. To this must be added their subsidiaries and shareholdings in companies with a government holding at least 1% of the capital. Entities included in the scope of the APE include, to name but the most emblematic: Paris Airport, Casino d'Aix-les-Bains, Charbonnage de France, CNP-Assurances, France Televisions, GDF-Suez, La Française des jeux, La Poste, Orange, Renault, Safran, SNCF, SNPE, Thales.
As the EPA acknowledges, on its website, "the portfolio held directly or indirectly by the State is at the same time wide and very diverse, both with regard to the sectors of activity concerned and the weight of the State Within existing companies or legal forms. "
One wonders whether this portfolio is a true investor strategy or the chance of history. Between the ideological motives linked to the nationalizations of the past and the desire to save companies on the brink of bankruptcy, the state seems to be sailing on sight and in the short term contrary to what it affirms.
But the EPA is not the only tool available to the state shareholder. It can intervene indirectly via Bpifrance which is a 50% shareholder with the Caisse des Depots et Consignations. BPIFrance favors minority shareholdings in SMEs and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with a prospect of exit at the end of a stage of their development.
The State shareholder portfolio

Thus, our state is far from being deprived to intervene in the management of companies and its position of influence is unique in the western countries. But what does he do with this power? Through the APE, it participates in the appointment of 765 directors of companies with a total consolidated turnover of 147 billion euros. This means that its scope of interventions is very broad.
The amount of its investments in 2015 amounted to 90 billion euros. These holdings yielded 3.9 billion dividends in 2015, compared to 4.1 billion in 2014. For 2016, the forecast in the budget is 1.9 billion euros (excluding EDF shares). This decline in income for the EPA is accompanied by a drop in the shareholder return of the portfolio, which has become negative (-9.95%) due to the collapse of so-called "utilities" values.
If these shares were taken out, it was 28.9%. Note that this return takes into account the divestment operations (Engie, Safran, Adit, Toulouse Airport). Fiscal year 2015 was also marked by a negative net result of the State's shareholdings of 10.1 billion euros. These losses are due to "non-recurring" items such as depreciation of assets of SNCF and EDF, the fall in the price of oil and gas for Engie (ex GDF Suez), the cost of the waste storage project Radioactive Cigéo, etc. With such figures, it is not surprising that the performance of the state portfolio is lower than that of the market.
Interventions by the investing State

However, comparing the stock market performance of the EPA portfolio with that which the market can make through the performance of the CAC 40 is not necessarily relevant insofar as the EPA also has the task of "intervening In rescue operations of companies whose failure would have systemic consequences ", in short to save lame ducks. On the other hand - and there is no contradiction - the EPA must "ensure the fair remuneration of own funds and in the composition of the portfolio to optimize the strategic return of the public euro invested. Difficult in these conditions to make coherent arbitrations. Only the will of the prince must make it possible to resolve these conflicts of objectives.
The principal justification for the presence of the State as a shareholder in the capital of undertakings is, according to the guidelines of its action, "its capacity for intervention or anticipation of its own" and that its intervention "falls within the In favor of projects which may have a delayed return ".
In short, the state would be a wise, visionary investor with a long-term commitment, the very opposite of what is supposed to be private shareholders. One wonders why other countries have not thought about it and why they often enjoy a better competitiveness. In addition, many of our large listed companies with a totally private shareholding are doing well and have a long-term vision. On the other hand, the latest developments in state action do not necessarily prove its presence.
As an illustration of the more or less successful State interventions, we can mention the case of Renault with the intervention on the remuneration of its CEO, the case of EDF or the case of Alstom.
For a disengagement

The multiplicity and variety of State interventions make the legibility of its action a problem. The State, by pursuing several objectives, sometimes antagonistic, seems to act rather as a firefighter in an emergency than as a long-term strategist (see the Alstom case). Torn between political and trade union pressure, the government does not always know where it is headed, except to save time from now until the next election. Add to this the political choices that can vary over time following the elections and do not foster a long-term vision on the part of the State.
So should we end the state ownership as suggested by Professor Jean-Marc Daniel ? Presumably, yes. In his presidential candidate program, François Fillon promised to resume privatization. This proposal should not frighten us. After all, the Jospin government did not hesitate to privatize more than its predecessors. This program, which was abandoned during François Hollande's five-year term, must be resumed.
Such disengagement from the state in companies that are part of the competitive sector will generate significant room for maneuver and allow the State to focus on its core missions. That being so, and as the United States very well knows, we must not exclude the possibility for the state to intervene punctually and in a limited way in time to save a particular company that is in difficulty. In this regard, we think of the successful action of the US government to save car manufacturers seriously affected after the subprime crisis in 2008.
Beyond calling into question the role of the shareholder state, individual shareholders should be strengthened by encouraging capital investment and the creation of pension funds by capitalization in addition to pay-as-you-go pensions. In this respect, taxation on capital that is too heavily taxed in France (ISF + tax alignment on capital income over labor income) will also need to be reviewed. Today, more than 50% of the capital of our flagship CAC 40 is held by foreign investors. It is also, unfortunately, another specific feature of our economy. Instead of making fine speeches on economic patriotism, action should be taken to ensure that the French effectively regain power in the capital of their enterprises.

Le Point : À quoi sert l'État actionnaire ?

À quoi sert l'État actionnaire ? http://bit.ly/2htQoLl
Avec 90 milliards d'euros de participation dans les entreprises, l'État actionnaire a un pouvoir important en France. Trop important ? Tribune.

S'il fallait choisir deux caractéristiques qui distinguent véritablement l'économie française des autres pays occidentaux, nous citerions le niveau très élevé de la dépense publique et la présence de l'État au capital de nombreuses entreprises du secteur concurrentiel. Ces deux caractéristiques conjuguées font que la France est loin d'être une économie libérale.
La dépense publique française

Lorsque la dépense publique représente environ 57 % du PIB, soit 13 points de plus que l'Allemagne – notre principal partenaire en Europe – et que ce pourcentage n'a fait qu'augmenter depuis 35 ans au moins, on mesure le degré de socialisation de notre économie. Pourquoi pas après tout si cela est le choix des Français ?

Rappelons-nous cependant que l'ancien président Giscard d'Estaing estimait qu'au-delà du seuil de 40 %, on basculait dans la « société socialiste ». C'était il y a bien longtemps. Sans qu'il soit formellement démontré qu'un tel niveau de dépenses publiques soit un handicap pour notre économie, on peut néanmoins penser que cette particularité pèse sur son dynamisme et sa compétitivité dans la mesure où toutes ces dépenses ne sont pas toujours justifiées ou porteuses de croissance, comme le souligne régulièrement la Cour des comptes.
Même le président Hollande dans sa conférence de presse lors des vœux pour 2014 dénonçait un État « trop lourd, trop lent, trop cher » et s'engageait sur un plan d'économie de 50 milliards d'euros. Néanmoins, la Cour des comptes doutait dès 2015 de la réalisation de ce plan d'économie. Son président, Didier Migaud, affirmait : « On ne voit pas beaucoup de mesures de baisses de dépenses prises en 2015 et qui vont porter effet en 2016 et en 2017. En revanche, nous voyons beaucoup d'augmentations de dépenses qui auront des conséquences les années suivantes. » Ainsi va la dépense publique en France.
Le poids de l'État

La deuxième caractéristique de notre économie est le poids de l'État sur les décisions des entreprises industrielles et commerciales. Cette pression s'exerce notamment à travers ses participations au capital de nombreuses entreprises du secteur concurrentiel.
Le bras armé de ces interventions est l'Agence des participations de l'État (APE) créée en 2004 et qui est placée sous la tutelle du ministre de l'Économie et des Finances. Comme on peut le lire sur son site : « L'agence des participations de l'État incarne l'État actionnaire, investisseur en fonds propres dans des entreprises jugées stratégiques par l'État, pour stabiliser leur capital ou les accompagner dans leur développement ou leur transformation. »
De façon encore plus précise, l'article 2 du décret portant la création de l'APE stipule que « l'agence examine, en liaison avec les ministères intéressés, les principaux programmes d'investissement et de financement des entreprises ainsi que les projets d'acquisition ou de cession, d'accord commercial ou de coopération et de recherche et développement. Elle propose au ministre chargé de l'économie la position de l'État actionnaire sur ces sujets et la met en œuvre. »
Des participations « stratégiques » ?

C'est dire le champ très étendu de sa mission dans les entreprises qui bénéficient de son soutien. Les entités relevant du périmètre de l'APE sont nombreuses (on en compte 81 en 2015) et variées. Il est permis de s'interroger, pour certaines, sur leur caractère « stratégique ».
Le portefeuille des participations de l'État. © DR Agence des participations de l'Etat.

Il faut dire que cette caractéristique est suffisamment élastique pour permettre de qualifier de stratégique toute entreprise tricolore dès lors qu'on fait référence au patriotisme économique. À cela, il faut ajouter leurs filiales et les participations dans les entreprises dont l'État détient au moins 1 % du capital. Les entités relevant du périmètre de l'APE comprennent, pour n'en citer que les plus emblématiques : Aéroport de Paris, Casino d'Aix-les-Bains, Charbonnage de France, CNP-Assurances, France Télévisions, GDF-Suez, La Française des jeux, La Poste, Orange, Renault, Safran, SNCF, SNPE, Thales.
Comme le reconnaît l'APE, sur son site, « le portefeuille détenu directement ou non par l'État est aujourd'hui à la fois étendu et très divers, tant au regard des secteurs d'activité concernés que du poids de l'État au sein des entreprises ou des formes juridiques existantes. »
On peut se demander si ce portefeuille relève d'une véritable stratégie d'investisseur ou du hasard de l'histoire. Entre les motifs idéologiques liés aux nationalisations du passé et la volonté de sauver des entreprises au bord du dépôt de bilan, l'État semble naviguer à vue et à court terme contrairement à ce qu'il affirme.
Mais l'APE n'est pas le seul outil à la disposition de l'État actionnaire. Il peut intervenir indirectement via Bpifrance dont il est actionnaire à 50 % avec la Caisse des dépôts et consignations. Bpifrance privilégie des prises de participations minoritaires dans des PME et des entreprises de taille intermédiaires (ETI) avec une perspective de sortie au terme d'une étape de leur développement.
Le portefeuille de l'État actionnaire

Ainsi, notre État est loin d'être démuni pour intervenir dans la gestion des entreprises et sa position d'influence est unique dans les pays occidentaux. Mais que fait-il de ce pouvoir ? À travers l'APE, il participe à la nomination de 765 administrateurs de sociétés qui réalisent un chiffre d'affaires total consolidé de 147 milliards d'euros. C'est dire si son périmètre d'interventions est très large.
Le montant de ses participations en 2015 s'élevait à 90 milliards d'euros. Ces participations lui ont rapporté 3,9 milliards de dividendes en 2015 contre 4,1 milliards en 2014. Pour 2016, la prévision inscrite au budget est de 1,9 milliard d'euros (hors titres EDF). À cette baisse de revenus pour l'APE, il faut ajouter la chute du rendement actionnarial du portefeuille qui est devenu négatif (- 9,95 %) du fait de l'effondrement des valeurs dites « utilities ».
Si on sort ces participations, il ressort à + 28,9 %. À noter que ce rendement prend en compte les opérations de cessions (Engie, Safran, Adit, Aéroport de Toulouse). L'exercice 2015 a aussi été marqué par un résultat net négatif des participations de l'État de 10,1 milliards d'euros. Ces pertes sont dues à des éléments « non récurrents » comme les dépréciations d'actifs de la SNCF et d'EDF, la chute du prix du pétrole et du gaz pour Engie (ex GDF Suez), le coût du projet de stockage de déchets radioactifs Cigéo, etc. Avec de tels chiffres, il ne faut pas s'étonner que la performance du portefeuille de l'État soit inférieure à celle du marché.
Les interventions de l'État investisseur

Ceci étant, comparer la performance boursière du portefeuille des participations de l'APE à celle que peut faire le marché à travers la performance du CAC 40 n'est pas forcément pertinente dans la mesure où l'APE a aussi pour mission « d'intervenir dans des opérations de sauvetage d'entreprises dont la défaillance présenterait des conséquences systémiques », bref de sauver des canards boiteux. Mais par ailleurs – et on n'est pas à une contradiction près –, l'APE doit « veiller à la juste rémunération des fonds propres et dans la composition du portefeuille à l'optimisation du rendement stratégique de l'euro public investi. » Difficile dans ces conditions de faire des arbitrages cohérents. Seule la volonté du prince doit permettre de résoudre ces conflits d'objectifs.
La justification principale de la présence de l'État actionnaire au capital des entreprises est, selon les lignes directrices de son action, « sa capacité d'intervention ou d'anticipation qui lui sont propres » et que son intervention « s'inscrit dans la durée, en faveur notamment de projets qui peuvent avoir un retour différé ».
Bref, l'État serait un investisseur avisé, visionnaire et porteur d'un engagement à long terme, tout le contraire de ce que sont supposés être les actionnaires privés. On se demande pourquoi les autres pays n'y ont pas pensé et pourquoi ces derniers jouissent bien souvent d'une meilleure compétitivité. Par ailleurs, nombreuses sont nos grandes entreprises cotées avec un actionnariat totalement privé qui se portent bien et ont une vision à long terme. À l'opposé, les derniers développements de l'action de l'État ne témoignent pas forcément en faveur de sa présence.
À titre d'illustration des interventions plus ou moins heureuses de l'État, citons le cas de Renault avec l'intervention sur la rémunération de son PDG, le cas d'EDF ou encore le cas d'Alstom.
Pour un désengagement

La multiplicité et la variété des interventions de l'État font que la lisibilité de son action pose un problème. L'État, en voulant poursuivre plusieurs objectifs, parfois antagonistes, semble agir plutôt comme un pompier dans l'urgence que comme un stratège à long terme (cf. le cas Alstom). Ballotté entre les pressions politiques et syndicales, le gouvernement ne sait pas toujours où il veut en venir, sauf à gagner du temps d'ici à la prochaine élection. Ajoutons à cela les choix politiques qui peuvent varier dans le temps à la suite des élections et qui ne favorisent pas une vision à long terme de la part de l'État.
Alors faut-il en finir avec l'État actionnaire comme le suggère le professeur Jean-Marc Daniel ? Vraisemblablement, oui. Dans son programme de candidat à la présidentielle, François Fillon a promis de reprendre les privatisations. Cette proposition ne doit pas nous faire peur. Après tout, le gouvernement Jospin n'a pas hésité à privatiser davantage que ses prédécesseurs. Il faut effectivement reprendre ce programme qui a été abandonné durant le quinquennat de François Hollande.
Un tel désengagement de l'État dans des entreprises qui relèvent du secteur concurrentiel dégagera des marges de manœuvre non négligeables et permettra à l'État de se concentrer sur ses missions fondamentales. Ceci étant, et comme savent très bien le faire les États-Unis, il ne faut pas exclure la possibilité pour l'État d'intervenir ponctuellement et de façon limitée dans le temps pour sauver telle ou telle entreprise qui serait en difficulté. On pense à cet égard à l'action réussie du gouvernement américain pour sauver les constructeurs automobiles gravement touchés après la crise des crédits subprime en 2008.
Au-delà de la remise en cause du rôle de l'État actionnaire, il conviendra de renforcer l'actionnariat individuel en favorisant l'investissement en fonds propres et la création de fonds de retraite par capitalisation en complément des retraites par répartition. À cet égard, la fiscalité sur le capital qui est trop lourdement taxée en France (ISF + alignement des impôts sur les revenus du capital sur ceux du travail) devra aussi être revue. Aujourd'hui, plus de 50 % du capital de nos fleurons du CAC 40 est détenu par des investisseurs étrangers. C'est aussi, malheureusement, une autre spécificité de notre économie. Au lieu de faire de beaux discours sur le patriotisme économique, il conviendrait d'agir pour que les Français reprennent effectivement le pouvoir dans le capital de leurs entreprises.

>>> Abertis looks to team up with Gavio to acquire northern Italian motorways -

Abertis looks to team up with Gavio to acquire northern Italian motorways - report (translated)

Abertis [BME:ABE] is looking to team up with Gavio, the construction group, in order to acquire other motorway operating companies in northern Italy, Italian-language daily Milano Finanza reported.
The unsourced report said that Abertis is looking to increase its presence in northern Italy following its acquisition of Autostrada Brescia Verona Vicenza Padova (Serenissima) and sees Gavio as a natural partner.
The report said that Abertis has already shown interest in Brebemi and Tangenziale Esterna controlled by Autostrade Lombarde and Pedemontana Lombarda for acquisition.
According to a previous report, Pedemontana was seeking to sell a 43% stake for EUR 235m.

>>> What to look at today - 22nd of December 2016

Dow -0.16% S&P -0.24% Nasdaq -0.23% Russell -0.63%
US Market closed lower ahead of Xmas week end. Cyclical sectors like technology (-0.2%), financials (-0.2%), and industrials (-0.4%) spent the day in negative territory while the health care sector (-0.6%) retreated into the afternoon. Biotechnology contributed to the weakness in the health care sector, sending the IBB lower by 1.1%. Two other cyclical groups—energy (+0.2%) and materials (+0.1%)—spent the day atop the leaderboard, with energy advancing despite a 1.3% slide in crude oil to $52.55/bbl. The energy component retreated after the release of bearish inventory data from the Department of Energy. Volume were below average with 850mil shares. US After Hours MU +10%, RHT -13% on earnings. Asian markets were widely weaker in quiet pre-holiday trade, volumes remain thin and currencies range bound. Icahn confirms he will serve as a special advisor to President Trump and Trump names China critic Peter Navarro chief of newly formed White House Trade Council - a move seen that will put China/USD trade relations on ice. Japan Cabinet approves FY17/18 budget spending plan of ¥97.5T (record high) v ¥96.7T in current year. Also reduced JGB issuance plans to ¥154T from the current ¥162T. They also cut new JGB issuance budget seen at ¥34.37T v ¥34.43T in current year. PBoC said to have ordered cash injection yesterday to suppress sharp declines in bond markets. China to focus on reducing asset bubble risks in 2017 including limiting speculative activity in the real estate market, high corporate leverage and local govt debt.

Nikkei -0.09% Hang Seng -0.78% CSI -0.17% Shanghai -0.09%

Eur$ 1.0449 CNH 6.9403 CNY 6.94962 JPY 117.62 GBP 1.2370 CHF 1.0243 RUB 60.9150 WTI$ 52.52 +0.03%

S&P -0.13% EuroStoxx -0.15% Dax -0.20% SMI -0.07% FTSE -0.20%

Macro :
- Equities to Outperform Bonds in 2017 on Reflation, Natixis Says
- Uber Stops Self-Driving Pilot in California

Keep an eye on :
- AC FP : Accor to Restructure Australia Hotels, Buy A$200m of Real Estate
- ATLN VX : Actelion, J&J Enter in Exclusive Talks in Surprise Reversal --> ADS (ALIOY) +10% in NY
- AZA IM : Italy Unions Ask for Meeting With Government on Alitalia
- AI FP : Air Liquide Wins Contracts Worth More than EU100m for Ariane 6
- ATC NA : Altice Sells Belgium, Luxembourg Business to Telenet
- BMPS IM : Italy Govt May Approve Decree to Rescue Paschi Today: Stampa
- BMPS IM : Atlante II May Help Paschi NPL Securitization if Cap Plan Fails
- BMPS IM : Paschi Says Capital Raising From Debt Swap Up to EU2.06b
- BBVA SM : BBVA Fined $27 Million by Fed for Exceeding Underwriting Limits
- COL SM : Colonial Studies Becoming a Socimi, Cinco Dias Reports
- DB1 GY : Deutsche Boerse Increases Share in Tradegate to Almost 20%
- FCX US : Activist Investor Icahn Sells Part of Stake in Miner Freeport
- IAG LN : IAG Plans Direct Flights to Americas From Barcelona: Vanguardia
- ITV LN : ITV to See Improving Advertizing Trends Next Year: Macquarie
- JMT PL : J. Martins to Buy Back Jeronymo Stores, 51% of Hussel Iberia
- LSE LN : Deutsche Boerse CEO Sees EU Approval for LSE Deal: Handelsblatt
- MGGT LN : Meggitt jettisons ballast in bid to lift shares, Chief executive Stephen Young thinks the company might be at the turning point - FT
- NOKIA FH : Nokia Sues Apple for Patent Infringement in U.S., Germany
- PBR US : Petrobras Sold $13b From $15.1b 2016 Divestment Goal: CEO
- RBS LN : RBS Said to Be Close to Sale of $600m in Shipping Loans: Reuters
- ROG VX : Roche’s Emicizumab Meets Phase 3 Endpoint in Hemophilia A
- ROG VX : Roche’s MS Drug Helps Patients in Trio of Clinical Trials
- SAN FP : Sanofi Climbs as Actelion Reveals Exclusive Talks With J&J
- SLB US : Schlumberger Hits Session High; 1Q Div. Boost Likely, UBS Says
- FP FP : Total May Consider Buying Other Petrobras Assets: CEO, Total Buys Stakes in Petrobras Assets in $2.2b Deal
- UBSN VX : UBS France Agrees to Buy Banque Leonardo France, Set Up JV
- UCG IM : UniCredit CEO Says HVB Unit Will ’Never’ Be Sold: Handelsblatt