>>> EPA confirms that current emission standards for cars and trucks are not ap

EPA confirms that current emission standards for cars and trucks are not appropriate and should be revised
  • Today, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt is announcing the completion of the Midterm Evaluation process for the greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars and light trucks for model years 2022-2025, and his final determination that, in light of recent data, the current standards are not appropriate and should be revised.
  • \Administrator Pruitt is also announcing the start of a joint process with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to develop a notice and comment rulemaking to set more appropriate GHG emissions standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards. EPA Release (related tickers: F, GM, HMC, TM, CARZ, XLE)

WSJ : Technology Shares Plunge Again Amid Growing Backlash

Technology Shares Plunge Again Amid Growing Backlash
So-called FAANG stocks have lost roughly $324 billion in market capitalization since March 16

Investors rushed out of the biggest names in the technology industry Monday, the latest sign that scrutiny from lawmakers and regulators, backlash from consumers, and flagging share performance is threatening to undermine their dominance in the stock market.

Monday’s selling extended a streak of rough trading for the technology sector, which after leading the stock market higher for much of the past year has tumbled as negative news surrounding the industry’s giants has snowballed since mid-March.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite, which last set a record close just three weeks ago, gave up its gains for the year Monday, sliding 2.8% and underperforming the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500, both of which were on track for their lowest closes of the year.

Facebook Inc., FB -2.78% which kicked off the sector downturn last month amid criticism of its handling of users’ data, fell 2.8% Monday, deepening declines after its biggest one-quarter percentage loss since 2016. The company, which has lost about $83 billion in market value since mid-March, has been slammed by former company executives, as well as Silicon Valley rivals including Apple Inc. AAPL -1.35% CEO Tim Cook.

Amazon.com Inc. AMZN -4.98% also came under further pressure, shedding 4.7%, following tweets from President Donald Trump on Monday and over the weekend that attacked the company’s business practices. And Tesla Inc., which faced rebukes from the National Transportation Safety Board over the disclosures it made about a fatal crash involving one of its vehicles and its semiautonomous driving system, slipped 4.2%.

All together, the so-called FAANG stocks—Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix Inc. and Google parent Alphabet Inc. GOOGL -3.26% —have lost roughly $324 billion in market capitalization since March 16, before Facebook revealed a third-party firm with ties to the Trump administration had improperly kept its users’ data for years. The growing scrutiny around stalwart technology names has raised fears among investors of tighter regulations that could take aim at the most valuable commodity for many of the companies—users’ data.

“Whenever you think there’s some relief in sight, we get some political noise that comes out and it spooks the entire technology sector,” said Mohit Bajaj, director of ETF trading solutions at brokerage WallachBeth Capital.

Many investors remain optimistic about the technology industry’s growth potential. Technology companies in the S&P 500 are expected to post year-over-year earnings growth of 22% in the first quarter, according to FactSet, eclipsing the broader S&P 500’s expected 17% earnings growth rate and building on a strong fourth quarter.

Many of the companies under the biggest scrutiny have also delivered a strong track record of sales, with the holiday season pushing Amazon’s last quarterly profit above $1 billion for the first time, and sales of Apple’s flagship iPhone product helping the firm post its best quarterly revenue and profit ever last quarter.

Now, the question is whether impressive growth will be enough for investors who are questioning whether the technology sector’s run has been overdone. Facebook is down 12% for the year following a 53% surge in 2017, while Apple is down 1.4% after a 46% run in 2017 and Alphabet is down 4.3% after rising 33% last year.

Strong earnings, along with a sharp pullback in stock prices, has made valuations of tech companies more attractive, analysts said. Tech firms in the S&P 500 trade at roughly 18 times their forward-looking earnings over the next 12 months, down from 20 times in late January, according to FactSet. Consumer discretionary stocks have contracted too, falling to 20 times future earnings from 23. Amazon and Netflix sit in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500.

“In general tech is still growing earnings at an incredible pace, and we’ve created lots of opportunity for buyers,” said Art Hogan, managing director and chief market strategist at B. Riley FBR.

Still, tech and consumer discretionary stocks are relatively expensive compared with other pockets of the market: The S&P 500 is trading at 16 times future-earnings growth, while financial stocks in the S&P 500 are trading at just 13 times forward-looking earnings, a relative bargain among investors who believe the longer-term trend of rising interest rates will boost lenders’ profitability.


Growing share repurchases could help technology stocks recoup their losses. Tech firms last year spent $118.8 billion on share buybacks, which represented about 23% of all share buybacks in the S&P 500 in 2017 and was second only to share repurchases among financial firms, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Buybacks can make stocks look more attractive to investors by decreasing the number of outstanding shares on the market and pushing up per-share earnings.

Yet many analysts caution that volatility in technology names is likely to persist, with no easy solutions in sight yet for many of the issues that companies are facing. In one sign of traders bracing for further rockiness, the Cboe Nasdaq 100 Volatility Index, which measures expectations for swings in the Nasdaq 100 over the next 30 days, jumped 15% Monday, adding to a 96% advance for the year.

“This tech wreck is not a new story. But we’ve gotten a crescendo of bad news, and it seems like this one is lingering longer because we’ve had more questions crop up that haven’t been answered yet,” Mr. Hogan said.

>>> GE - Veritas Capital acquires revenue-cycle, ambulatory care and workforce m

Veritas Capital acquires revenue-cycle, ambulatory care and workforce management software unit from GE Healthcare for $1.1B in cash

- Entered into a definitive agreement with GE to acquire the Enterprise Financial Management (Revenue-Cycle, Centricity Business), Ambulatory Care Management (Centricity Practice Solution) and Workforce Management (formerly API Healthcare) assets comprising GE Healthcare’s Value-Based Care Division for $1.05 billion in cash.

- The healthcare technology space has been a key focus area for Veritas Capital, as illustrated by its recent investments in Truven Health Analytics and Verscend Technologies. The firm has a robust track record of strategically transforming businesses in the space by working closely with management teams to enhance customer benefits through accelerated growth, improved efficiencies, and the development of innovative products and services. Veritas will work alongside the GE management team to ensure a seamless transition of the business into a standalone company.

- The transaction is expected to close during the third quarter of 2018, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals. Morgan Stanley and Keval Health are acting as financial advisors to GE in the transaction. Goldman, Sachs & Co. and William Blair & Company are acting as financial advisors and Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP is serving as legal counsel to Veritas Capital in the transaction.

>>> S&P futures vs fair value: -7.00. Nasdaq futures vs fair va

S&P futures vs fair value: -7.00. Nasdaq futures vs fair value: -45.50.

The S&P 500 futures are trading seven points, or 0.3%, below fair value.

Equity indices in the Asia-Pacific region began the week on a mixed note, but overall volume was on the low side due to Easter-related closures in Australia, New Zealand, and Hong Kong. China imposed tariffs on 128 products imported from the United States while the country's Ministry of Commerce noted that trade disputes should be resolved through dialogue. On a separate note, China's President Xi Jinping said state-owned firms should reduce their leverage ratios as soon as possible. The Reserve Bank of Australia will meet overnight, but the cash rate is expected to remain unchanged at 1.50%.

  • In economic data:
    • China's March Caixin Manufacturing PMI 51.0 (expected 51.8; last 51.6)
    • Japan's March Manufacturing PMI 53.1 (expected 53.2; last 53.2). Q1 Tankan All Big Industry CAPEX +2.3% (expected 0.6%; last 7.4%) and Tankan All Small Industry Capex -16.8% (expected -21.0%; last -6.4%). Tankan Q1 Big Manufacturing Outlook Index 20 (expected 22; last 19) and Tankan Large Non-Manufacturers Index 23 (expected 24; last 23)
    • South Korea's March Nikkei Manufacturing PMI 49.1 (last 50.3)
    • Australia's MI Inflation Gauge +0.1% month-over-month (last -0.1%)

---Equity Markets---

  • Japan's Nikkei shed 0.3%. Olympus, Comsys Holdings, Mitsui Fudosan, Keisei Electric Railway, Keio, Tobu Railway, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Toho, and Okuma posted losses between 1.3% and 2.4%.
  • Hong Kong's Hang Seng was closed.
  • China's Shanghai Composite slipped 0.2%. Zhengzhou Yutong, SDIC Zhonglu Fruit Juice, Changhyuan Group, Shanxi Xinghuacun Fen Wine Factory, and Hongfa Technology surrendered between 3.1% and 4.7%.
  • India's Sensex rose 0.9% amid broad strength. Kotak Mahindra Bank, Adani Ports, Tata Motors, Wipro, Hero MotoCorp, Bajaj Auto, and Maruti Suzuki posted gains between 1.7% and 4.7%. On the downside, AXIS Bank fell 2.2% and ICICI Bank lost 5.9% amid a probe into a loan issued by a consortium that includes ICICI Bank.

Equity markets across Europe are closed for Easter Monday. Germany's Finance Minister Olaf Scholz is reportedly seeking a provision to cushion the impact of the debt burden in the event of a rapid increase in interest rates.

  • Investors did not receive any economic data of note

---Equity Markets---

  • Germany's DAX is closed
  • France's CAC is closed
  • UK's FTSE is closed

Recode : Snapchat is mocking Facebook and its Russian political ads controversy

Snapchat is mocking Facebook and its Russian political ads controversy with a new April Fools’ Day filter
Nothing is off-limits in the fight between the two social media companies.
Snapchat is leaning into its bitter rivalry with Facebook this April Fool’s Day, unveiling a photo filter that pokes Facebook in the eye for its inability to curtail the Russian influence campaign on its site.
A new filter allows you to pretend you are uploading a new profile photo to Facebook — but the standard news feed language that someone “updated their profile picture” instead reads in Cyrillic. The people who like the photo are “Your Mom,” “A bot” and “2 others” — with all that language being featured in Cyrillic-looking text.
Here’s our friend Casey Newton of our sister site The Verge showing off the feature.
Casey Newton

✔@CaseyNewton

Omg the Snapchat April Fool's filter

  • 715

  • 147 people are talking about this

It’s a pretty aggressive prank by Snapchat — which has largely evaded the election-related Russia controversies that have ensnared Silicon Valley giants like Facebook, Twitter, Google and Reddit. But Snapchat hasn’t shied away from hand-to-hand combat with the social media giant that owns Instagram. Instagram copied Snapchat’s stories feature and its rise as a competitor to Snapchat is at least partly responsible for Snap’s business problems and lackluster performance on Wall Street.
Last April Fools’ Day, Snapchat nodded to that beef with a filter that that allowed someone to take a photo and apply a filter that was literally the Instagram interface. Well played.
But this year’s prank hits at a much more sensitive note — Facebook is in crisis, and Snapchat is pointing and laughing.

WSJ : Spotify CEO Daniel Ek: Once the Music Industry’s Slayer, Now Its Savior

Spotify CEO Daniel Ek: Once the Music Industry’s Slayer, Now Its Savior
The Swedish entrepreneur built his business by proving its value to artists and record-label executives

Days before Spotify Technology SA would debut as a publicly traded U.S. company, its Chief Executive Daniel Ek retweeted Taylor Swift.

In 2014, the singer had pulled all her music from Spotify in a dispute over streaming revenue. On Thursday, she tweeted: “New video for #Delicate at midnight EST tonight. Only on @spotify.”

Mr. Ek added a few fire emojis.

Ms. Swift’s decision to release a video solely on Mr. Ek’s Spotify is perhaps the ideal endorsement for investors in the music-streaming service and a sign of the CEO and founder’s rare ability to turn even his most ardent critics into allies.

“Daniel’s true genius as an entrepreneur is his unique ability to have moved from the disruptor of an industry to the savior of it,” said Gregg Lemkau, co-head of the investment-banking division at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., GS 1.00% one of three banks that advised Spotify on its nontraditional IPO.

At an investor meeting in New York during the run-up to Tuesday’s IPO, Mr. Ek described the company’s mission as the “hard work of helping one million artists live off their art.”


With Spotify going public, that work will be done under Wall Street’s magnifying glass. The 35-year-old Swedish CEO faces the daunting task of making his company profitable while fending off streaming competition from tech giants such as Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Amazon.com Inc. Investors are counting on Mr. Ek to innovate and differentiate Spotify’s offerings and gain a foothold in scaling the service onto users’ smartphones in new markets.

Mr. Ek and other Spotify executives declined to be interviewed for this article, citing, among other things, a SEC-mandated quiet period ahead of its IPO.

The music industry’s overall revenue declined 40% between 1999 and 2014, but it has rebounded since then. Mr. Ek, who speaks softly but directly, told potential investors that is largely because of Spotify.

The service, which has 71 million paid user accounts, has paid more than €8 billion (about $10 billion) in royalties to artists, music labels and publishers.

Business partners, friends and associates say Mr. Ek’s message about Spotify’s value proposition for artists and consumers—and his low-key persona—have stayed consistent since he founded the company in Stockholm in 2006—well before he signed Spotify’s first contract with a music label.


“When I first met him, he could completely articulate how this could affect the music industry and what the world would look like,” said John Lindfors, managing partner of DST Global, an early Spotify investor, and previously the partner in charge of Goldman Sachs’s European tech franchise. “I was shaking my head about his crazy ambition, but what he said at a meeting in 2007 has turned out to become true.”

As a teenager in Sweden, Mr. Ek played guitar and wrote computer programs for money. By 2006, in his 20s, he had achieved a fair degree of wealth—and minor celebrity in Stockholm—through his work in the tech industry and selling an internet company he built to a larger competitor.

People close to him say he is steadfast in his belief that technology and transparency will win over the old-school music business. He avoids the limelight, sometimes pulling a hat over his face when walking around his home city.

“The record-industry executives were cultural icons in their own right,” said one former business associate. “Then there’s this soft-spoken Swede who is a complete tech nerd coming in to change the industry.”

Mr. Ek’s plan has been straightforward from the beginning: Consumers would pay a monthly fee or listen to ads for access to essentially all the music in the world. Spotify would negotiate with labels and pay royalties to stream their artists’ songs. But there was no precedent for a model of music consumption that didn’t rely on consumers buying and owning their music.

Musician and tech investor D.A. Wallach joined Spotify in 2011 ahead of its U.S. launch and was tasked with getting artists on board.

He said Mr. Ek was willing to endure long negotiations with skeptical musicians and music executives. The sticking point in those deals has been Spotify’s free ad-supported tier, which delivers significantly less revenue for the company and musicians—but attracts many more users—than the premium service. People close to Mr. Ek say he rarely compromises on things he is convinced of, the free tier being chief among them.

Mr. Wallach said Mr. Ek understood that the best way to woo the industry was with paychecks.

“Daniel really set the tone to just put up numbers,” he said. “And he’s delivered on the promises.”


Ms. Swift and others in the music industry have criticized the amount of money Spotify doles out to artists. Some musicians still hold out entirely from streaming services, and others, including Ms. Swift, have temporarily withheld new music to bolster album sales first.

Some in the record industry remain critical of Mr. Ek, frustrated with recent high executive turnover—particularly those responsible for striking deals with labels—at Spotify. Negotiations, people familiar with the matter say, sometimes stall to the point where Mr. Ek has to come to the table to reach a deal. Following the most recent chief content officer’s sudden exit from the company in January, Mr. Ek has assumed those responsibilities, according to people familiar with the matter.

Investors, bankers and business associates say Mr. Ek, who sometimes conducts meetings from a sofa, is much more accessible than most CEOs of highly valued private tech companies. He is known to respond to emails and texts at all hours, and they say his “egoless” personality and focus on his family distinguish him from most U.S. tech entrepreneurs.

He is often seen at playgrounds near his home with his children in the evenings and values family time. People close to Mr. Ek have raised questions about how Wall Street will view his leadership style when Spotify is traded publicly in the U.S., where expectations around executives’ work habits can be extremely demanding.

Scott Borchetta, the CEO of Big Machine Label Group who traded public jabs with Mr. Ek alongside Ms. Swift, said he and Mr. Ek mended ways when they met about 2½ years ago.

“There are a lot of things we actually agree on. We’re just going about them in different ways,” he said. “For there to be a healthy Spotify and Apple and Amazon they’re all going to have to figure out the value proposition—they have to convince people to convert to paid subscriptions.”

As for the music industry, he added: “We can’t put the streaming genie back in the bottle. We’ve got to accept and embrace the way that people want to listen to music.”