FT Lex : It is investors vs gamers as Sony ditches discs The move is being prese

It is investors vs gamers as Sony ditches discs
The move is being presented as zeitgeist rather than greedy rent extraction

For diehard fans, Sony’s move to call time on physical games for its PlayStation console means game over on a series of treasured habits. No more boxes — aka gamers’ trophies — to line the shelves. No ownership, removing the ability to lend or sell, with potential knock-on effects on second-hand retailers such as CeX of the UK and GameStop in the US.

Conversely, it looks like game on for investors in the Japanese tech and entertainment conglomerate, which counts gaming and network services as its biggest division by revenue. Digital games zap pesky costs for pressing and shipping discs, and mean Sony no longer needs to leave space for retailers to add their cut. Inevitably, games sold through the PlayStation Store will be more profitable.

Sony is presenting the move, which takes effect from January 2028, as zeitgeist rather than greedy rent extraction. Some 85 per cent of its game sales were digital in the quarter ending March 31. The Japanese giant is the first in its field to pull the plug on physical discs — ironically perhaps, for a company that only just stopped production of Blu-ray Disc recorders and reverted to faxes in the wake of a 2014 hack. But others are moving in a similar direction.

The latest instalment of the Grand Theft Auto franchise will be released sans disc. And tittle-tattle in the gaming community has it that rival Microsoft’s next-generation Xbox won’t have a disc drive, suggesting it too is preparing for a wholly digital future. There must be a fair chance the next PlayStation, due in 2028, will not have one either.

Sony shareholders could use a break. The group has had some spectacular fumbles. Its $3.6bn purchase of Bungie, the studio behind Halo and Destiny 2 — a would-be forever game that turned out not to be forever — resulted in mass job cuts and hundreds of millions of dollars in write-offs in recent years. Its stock is down 17 per cent so far this year.

Capturing additional profit on games must be handy for Sony given the high price of memory chips is raising the cost of all sorts of hardware. Fellow Japanese gaming group Nintendo has already flagged lower sales expectations for its Switch 2, which from September will cost an additional $50 in the US. Fatter software margins may allow Sony a little more leeway when it comes to pricing the next PlayStation.

There’s no doubt it’s a bold move; and one that has roundly antagonised the faithful: angst and petitions are proliferating across bulletin boards. Sony will also miss out on the inevitable nostalgia for retro that has seen Gen Zers amass vinyl. But still, this is one Sony shokku that its shareholders should be happy to take.

WSJ : China Is Devastating the Last Stronghold of German Industry Midsize compan

China Is Devastating the Last Stronghold of German Industry
Midsize companies that employ millions of workers are now shedding jobs and relocating overseas to cut costs

  • German “Mittelstand” manufacturers face severe competition as China closes the quality gap and offers lower prices, leading to job losses and a trade deficit.
  • German industrial output declined by about 10% between February 2022 and early 2026, and industry loses over 10,000 jobs monthly, according to EY.
  • China’s “10,000 Little Giants” initiative, backed by state subsidies, aims to replace German firms, prompting EU leaders to seek new trade-defense powers.

FRANKFURT—For decades, thousands of niche, world-class manufacturers that form the backbone of the German economy relied on an unassailable moat: unmatched quality. Now that moat is drying up.

The Mittelstand—a broad tier of midsize manufacturers, mainly specialized in capital and intermediate goods and reliant on exports—once thrived by making machines for factories everywhere. But China is now closing the quality gap and offering prices as low as half those of their European rivals.

As panic spreads among German manufacturers, layoffs are rolling through formerly prosperous towns and villages with no living memory of a downturn. The moment could become a political turning point for a country whose wealth was largely created by the Mittelstand, or “middle-class”—shorthand for the inner core of Europe’s largest economy.

For the first time in decades, Germany now imports more advanced capital goods from China than it exports there. Manufacturers are suddenly on the defensive, not just in China and elsewhere, but also at home. Many Mittelstand firms are idling workers, cutting jobs or shifting production, including to China.

Patric Burkhart, managing director of machinery manufacturer Aura, based in southwest Germany with 115 employees and around $30 million in annual revenue, said Chinese competition had surged over just the past six months, causing orders to dry up.

Aura makes heating equipment that is built into bigger industrial machines, such as presses, ovens and extruders—which make everything from plastic bags and window frames to car parts and snacks.

A Chinese competitor recently emerged in the market, creating strong price pressure, Burkhart said. To win projects with the incumbent German and Japanese manufacturers, he said, “I have to be very creative.”

German industry is losing more than 10,000 jobs every month, according to a May report by EY. Industrial output declined by around 10% between February 2022 and early 2026, with energy-intensive sectors plunging by more than 15%.

Germany’s trade balance with China in capital goods slid from a surplus of roughly 750 million euros to a €500 million deficit between mid-2024 and August 2025 on a 12-month rolling average, according to New York-based Apollo Global Management. Germany’s machine-tools exports to China slumped by around one-third in the first quarter from a year earlier.

If European policymakers don’t take tougher measures to protect industry, “you could see a very rapid decline of the German Mittelstand,” said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at the research firm Rhodium Group.

European leaders are seeking new legal powers to hit back at China. China’s overall goods exports to Germany alone have jumped 17% this year through May compared with the year prior, and those to the European Union have increased 16%, according to dollar-denominated data from Chinese customs.

China has increasingly leaned on manufacturing to drive economic growth following an epic property-market collapse. Facing weak demand at home and overflowing warehouses, factories are aggressively selling overseas, driving the nation’s trade surplus to a historic $1.2 trillion last year.

This evolution was a deliberate, state-backed engineering feat. Under its “10,000 Little Giants” initiative, the Chinese government funneled massive subsidies, tax breaks and state resources into thousands of specialized midsize firms, explicitly designed to replace Germany’s famed “hidden champions.”

There are still German companies that make products that China needs, said Barkin. These include Trumpf, a maker of lasers, and Zeiss, which manufactures optical devices used in medical machines and chip-making equipment. But Beijing is trying to address those dependencies and produce those goods.

When a manufacturer in Eastern Europe or South America sets up a new plant, they can now buy the entire ecosystem—the injection machines, robotic arms, dryers and cloud management software—directly from a single, unified Chinese vendor.

“China has already eaten much of German industry’s lunch and is preparing to start on dinner,” the Centre for European Reform, a London-based think tank, bluntly warned in a recent report.

Compounding the crisis are high energy prices and weak demand in Europe, deflationary pressures in China that lower export prices, and a yuan many economists believe is undervalued.

Competition is particularly fierce in sectors where scale matters, such as heat pumps or autos, said Clemens Fuest, president of the Ifo Institute for Economic Research, a think tank. More specialized firms are faring better for now. “It is hard to say where this will end,” Fuest said.

Mittelstand businesses, which long prided themselves on a die-hard free-trade ethic, have recently started requesting government protection from state-backed Chinese firms.

Chinese competitors already control one-third of global production in the machinery sector, said Oliver Richtberg, head of foreign trade at the Machinery and Equipment Manufacturers’ Association, or VDMA, a lobby group whose members employ one million German workers. The tipping point is fast approaching, Richtberg said: “If they get to 40% or 50%, we won’t have any levers left.”

The EU has launched a record number of trade cases against Beijing over the past two years, but those measures cover a fraction of total Chinese imports. Broader and tougher trade defenses discussed at a June summit meeting in Brussels will likely take a year or more to materialize.

Michael Suess, a longtime Siemens executive and now executive chairman of Swiss coatings manufacturer Oerlikon, said the German Mittelstand is in trouble mainly because of high costs at home and a new generation of family entrepreneurs he sees as lacking ambition.

“Yes, China is getting more competitive,” Suess said. But “Germany needs real reforms, we have to get out of our comfort zone.”

Still, over three-quarters of German mechanical engineering companies see competition from China as the biggest strategic challenge worldwide, according to a survey published in January by Hamburg-based consulting firm Infront.

Back at Aura, Burkhart said Chinese, Japanese and even German customers increasingly want him to manufacture in China. One motivation is cost. For Chinese manufacturers, there is also rising political pressure to transfer value creation to China.

Burkhart, who once produced exclusively in Germany, now makes 20% of his products in China. That share could increase to 70% if nothing changes in Europe, he said.

“We’re in a very sticky situation,” he said. “It is a historic change that brings the whole society under pressure.”

WSJ : Trump Speaks at Mount Rushmore, Where He Wants to See His Face Geotechnica

Trump Speaks at Mount Rushmore, Where He Wants to See His Face
Geotechnical surveys have ruled out adding to the monument that is hosting the president on the eve of America’s 250th

  • President Trump spoke at Mount Rushmore, a memorial he has mused about joining despite structural impossibility.
  • Geotechnical surveys found the granite’s structural integrity “entirely spent,” risking catastrophic rockfalls if sculpted.
  • In his second term, Trump has sought to apply his personal brand to public infrastructure and federal real estate.


President Trump spoke in front of Mount Rushmore on Friday ahead of the country’s Independence Day celebration, at the memorial honoring four past presidents that he has mused about joining.

The monument in the Black Hills of South Dakota has long caught Trump’s attention, even if adding his face to it is structurally impossible. This term, Trump has led an unprecedented effort to apply his personal brand to the nation, in public infrastructure, government programs and federal real estate.

Kristi Noem, the former South Dakota governor and Trump’s former homeland security secretary, once gave him a 4-foot-tall replica of the memorial, with his face joining the four presidents.

“Sounds like a good idea to me!” Trump said about the prospect in his first term on social media.

The monument is hosting fireworks for Trump’s visit, after a several-year hiatus.


The festivities come in the midst of a heat wave so severe that the marquee fair on the National Mall in Washington was closed for several hours on Friday afternoon.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, who is traveling with Trump to the South Dakota monument, has discussed Trump’s inclusion on it. He told Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump on her Fox News show last year that there was room for the president. Asked recently in an interview with The Wall Street Journal about Trump supporters’ call for the 47th president’s face to be carved into the monument, Burgum didn’t rule it out.

“I’m sure that there are going to be a lot of people that are going to say we need to build something recognizing President Trump,” Burgum said. “But I think right now what he’s focused on is…fixing everything we have.”

Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida filed legislation in January 2025 that would direct the interior secretary to carve Trump on Mount Rushmore because of “his transformative impact on America and the historical significance of his leadership.”

Geotechnical surveys commissioned by the National Park Service concluded that the structural integrity of the granite in the region is fragile. Technicians monitoring the monument’s 140 microfractures have noted that further high-impact sculpting would risk catastrophic rockfalls, potentially destabilizing the sculpture of Abraham Lincoln.

The presidents were chosen by the sculptor Gutzon Borglum, who initially had grander plans for the memorial. The funds for the sculpture were appropriated by Congress, and lawmakers declared it complete in 1941 shortly after his death.

The monument features the first U.S. president, George Washington; Thomas Jefferson, the third president; Lincoln, who led the country through the Civil War; and Theodore Roosevelt, who spent time in the Dakotas and was chosen to represent development of the U.S.

A spokeswoman for the White House didn’t respond directly to questions about Trump’s efforts to put himself on Mount Rushmore. “President Trump will be remembered as one of the greatest and most consequential presidents in history,” said the spokeswoman, Taylor Rogers.

In Trump’s second term, he has sought to put his name and imprint on many things, from commemorative U.S. passports to the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Palm Beach International Airport will officially become Donald J. Trump International Airport this month.

In the tax bill passed by Congress last year, savings accounts for children in the U.S. were named Trump Accounts. Trump’s image hangs on banners at many federal buildings in Washington, D.C., a departure from past administrations.

FT : Trump will oppose heavy US AI regulation, says outgoing tech adviser Sriram

Trump will oppose heavy US AI regulation, says outgoing tech adviser
Sriram Krishnan tells the FT the president is against a centralised regulator as AI backlash grows

Donald Trump will not establish a formal licensing regime for AI, the president’s departing AI adviser has said, even as the White House wields emergency powers to stall the most advanced models.

“There will not be an FDA for AI,” Sriram Krishnan told the FT in his first in-depth interview since leaving the administration last month, referring to the powerful US food and drug regulator.

“This administration, [the] president, from day one has been against burdensome, onerous, bureaucratic red tape,” he added. “We are not in the business of picking winners and losers.” 

Krishnan said setting up a centralised agency requiring “a team of lawyers before you can get a model out” would put “sand in the gears” of the AI revolution. “That is never, never going to happen under President Trump,” he said.

His prediction comes weeks after the US government made an unprecedented intervention on national security grounds to force Anthropic to withdraw its most capable model, Mythos, and hold up the release of OpenAI’s 5.6.


Krishnan, an Indian-born former venture capitalist who worked with Elon Musk before entering government, has been among the key advocates for light-touch AI regulation in Trump’s circle alongside AI tsar David Sacks.

Some in Washington blame the administration’s deregulatory zeal for a growing backlash against AI among American voters and within Trump’s Maga coalition, reflecting concern about data centres and the societal impact of the technology.

A large majority of Americans support stringent regulations to rein in AI, while at least 75 data centre projects worth approximately $130bn were disrupted by local opposition in the first three months of 2026, according to researcher Data Center Watch.

But Krishnan, who has worked to block state-level AI regulation and helped draft a White House framework for narrow child safety and content laws, laid the blame for the backlash squarely on the industry’s own “doomer” messaging.

The AI sector “has done a terrible job” of explaining the benefits of the tech, Krishnan said, such as advanced medical diagnoses.

Leaders of American AI labs “have focused so much on the dystopian narrative and scenarios, whether it is job loss, whether it is [existential] risk . . . that a lot of people are going: well, I don’t know if I want this,” he added. 

Voters, he argued, wanted to feel “they have a seat at the table and this is not just two or three companies becoming incredibly powerful and wealthy” — a sentiment the president has seized on. Trump recently pushed to get companies to donate equity stakes to the American people, and discussed the plans with OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman.

Despite warnings from Silicon Valley about this amounting to backdoor nationalisation, Krishnan supported the move.

“There are lots of questions about what form it can take . . . but I do think some way for regular people to feel like, OK, when I use this model, or when I see the graphs going up and I watch on CNBC, I am benefiting. I think that is good.” 

Americans, he added, “need to feel that AI is something which is empowering them”.

The 42-year-old, who entered the White House days after Trump’s inauguration in 2025, was one of a small group of Silicon Valley figures who moved to Washington early in the president’s second term to help the administration develop its approach to AI. 

A former Andreessen Horowitz partner, he spent his first 24 hours in office briefing the president and the National Security Council on the capabilities of China’s DeepSeek models and writing the phrase “we need to unleash American entrepreneurship” into a Trump speech that evening.

Among his strange duties as Silicon Valley’s translator in Washington, he said, was explaining Roko’s Basilisk, an internet thought experiment about a vengeful future superintelligence, “to a bunch of the cabinet”.

Over the past 18 months, Krishnan and Sacks pushed for a ban on “onerous” state-level AI safeguards, and a light-touch approach to monitoring advanced models for national and cyber security risks. The duo, who are close to Trump mega-donor Marc Andreessen, warned that throttling AI innovation with excessive regulation would help Chinese companies eclipse America’s leading models.

But more recently a series of new models with powerful cyber security capabilities have driven renewed momentum for the government to take a hand in controlling the technology.

OpenAI’s Altman last week said the government’s demand to limit the release of its latest 5.6 model was not “optimal”, while Silicon Valley investors warned against the creation of an ad hoc licensing regime in which frontier models must get clearance from the Trump administration.

Some accused the government of seeking to punish Anthropic, which Trump has called “radical left” over its clash with the Pentagon about the use of its AI in warfare — an allegation that Krishnan denied.

Krishnan has spent the past few weeks speaking to world leaders unnerved by Washington’s unilateral move to switch off access to Mythos. He supported Trump’s use of export controls to force Anthropic to temporarily suspend the model, but said the government took the decision “very, very reluctantly”, after safety concerns were raised by Amazon, which had found a vulnerability in the model.

“I think the government will always try to make sure our systems and our security [are] protected,” Krishnan said, adding that senior administration figures like vice-president JD Vance raised concerns about shielding critical infrastructure from advanced models. 

In the longer term, Krishnan argued, oversight of frontier models should pass largely to the industry itself, with a voluntary body or “clearinghouse” that includes large tech groups, chipmakers, and security companies that would seek to identify vulnerabilities “in concert with the intelligence community or the Department of War”.

Such a system would comply with a recent executive order from the president, which established a voluntary framework through which the US government would get 30 days to review a model before its release. 

But Krishnan warned that if cutting-edge AI tools were held back by the government for several weeks, “that would probably be bad for American innovation”.

The departing Trump adviser leaves the administration months after Sacks ended his role as AI tsar and is now recruiting AI engineers to help governments across the west develop AI policy. Krishnan added that US allies might seek to use “open weight” models with public training parameters that they can fine-tune.

“It is very concerning to me that we have these Chinese open-weight models that are good, and we don’t really have a leading American open-weight model yet,” he said.

Asked whether a future Democratic government could use the Trump administration’s unilateral use of export controls as a pretext to stall the rollout of AI, Krishnan said: “I don’t think about future governments. I think about this government and this moment in time.”

FT : Top investors oppose £5.7bn private equity bid for energy group DCC Offer f

Top investors oppose £5.7bn private equity bid for energy group DCC
Offer from KKR and Bridgepoint subsidiary fails to win support from Ninety One, Aviva Investors and Fidelity International

Major shareholders have opposed a £5.7bn takeover of DCC by private equity firms, warning that the bid significantly undervalues the FTSE 100 energy firm’s growth prospects.

US private equity group KKR and Energy Capital Partners, a subsidiary of London-listed Bridgepoint, last month increased their bid for Dublin-headquartered DCC to £65.25 a share in cash plus £1.47 in dividends.

But even though DCC’s board said it would be minded to recommend the offer to shareholders, which was increased from the previous offer of £58, top investors have come out against the proposed deal.

Alessandro Dicorrado, a UK equity manager at Ninety One, a top shareholder, told the FT on Friday that he opposed the bid, adding: “I don’t like the price on DCC.”

Matt Bennison, head of UK equities at Aviva Investors, a top 10 shareholder, said the proposal “significantly undervalues” the business and that the asset manager “would be disappointed if the DCC board were to recommend an offer for the business at the level of £65.25 per share”.

“DCC is a company with many appealing characteristics — a strong and growing platform with a high return on capital and attractive cash generation. As a result, it is no surprise to see it receiving interest from potential acquirers.”

London-listed DCC, whose main markets are in Europe and the US, provides off-grid energy solutions such as liquid gas, while operating service stations and fleet services.

But any deal would mark the latest big departure from the London Stock Exchange in another blow to the country’s capital markets, following a series of private equity takeovers and defections to US exchanges.

Bennison said DCC’s “strong fundamentals mean that the company has multiple levers through which it can create significant value for existing shareholders over the coming years — organic growth, inorganic growth as well as an ability to return significant amounts of excess cash to shareholders via dividends and ongoing share buybacks”.

Alex Wright, UK equity fund manager at Fidelity International, one of DCC’s biggest investors, said that “we do not believe the revised proposal from the consortium adequately reflects our fair value of DCC and its long-term growth prospects”.

He added in comments made a few days ago that market sentiment “has been weak, largely due to previous concerns around the structural decline of its fossil fuel distribution business”.

Wright said “these fears are overdone” and that DCC’s “attractive valuation makes it stand out as a compelling recovery opportunity”.

DCC declined to comment.

>>> EU DATA CENTRE CLIMATE RULES -- FOLLOW-UP & TIMELINE UPDATE

================================================================
GRAHAM ADVISORS -- MARKET INTELLIGENCE
EU DATA CENTRE CLIMATE RULES -- FOLLOW-UP & TIMELINE UPDATE
Recap of 02-Jul note + state of play post expert meeting
03-Jul-2026
================================================================

RECAP -- WHAT THE FT REVEALED (01/02-Jul)

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 4th of July 2026 V2(+)

>>> Up
* Close Brothers Raised to Buy at Shore Capital; PT 495 pence
* Deutsche Bank PT Raised to 41 euros from 40 euros at JPMorgan
* GEA Group Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 70 euros
* JM Raised to Buy at ABG; PT 160 kronor
* Maersk Raised to Neutral at Goldman; PT 16,000 kroner
* MPC Container Ships Raised to Buy at Pareto Securities (+)
* Novonesis Raised to Neutral at BNP Paribas; PT 415 kroner
* Novonesis ADRs Raised to Neutral at BNP Paribas; PT $63
* Tele2 Raised to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 173 kronor
* Tesla PT Raised to $430 from $400 at Truist Secs

>>> Down
* Bucher Cut to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 340 Swiss francs
* Bufab Cut to Hold at Handelsbanken; PT 136 kronor (+)
* Coca-Cola HBC Cut to Sell at Goodbody; PT 4,600 pence (+)
* DWS Cut to Sell at Bankhaus Metzler; PT 61.40 euros (+)
* Gjensidige Cut to Hold at Pareto Securities; PT 290 kroner
* Michelin Cut to Neutral at CIC; PT 35 euros (+)
* Repsol Cut to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 24 euros
* Stellantis Cut to Reduce at HSBC

>>> Initiation
* ARM Holdings ADRs Rated New Buy at SPDB Intl HK; PT $397
* Brooks Macdonald Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT 1,600 pence
* Ecora Royalties Plc Rated New Buy at Stifel; PT 230 pence (+)
* Hausvorteil Rated New Buy at NuWays; PT 17.80 euros (+)
* Navamedic Rated New Buy at Nordea; PT 21 kroner

>>> Call
* CCH Downgraded to Sell at Goodbody on Valuation Grounds (+)
* Citi Cautious on Alternative Asset Managers, EQT Negative Watch
* Stellantis Cut to Reduce at HSBC With Street-Low PT on Inventory (+)

>>> What to look at today - 4th of July 2026

Stocks rebounded after two days of tech-led losses in the US that were fueled by concerns that the artificial intelligence-driven rally had run ahead of itself. Gold extended gains as traders trimmed bets on Federal Reserve interest rate hikes. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index climbed 1.1%, with more than two shares rising for every one that declined in the gauge. All 11 subgroups of the benchmark advanced. Futures contracts tied to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index rose 0.6%. Stocks in mainland China, Hong Kong and Japan all gained in a broad rally that helped regional shares turn positive for the week. South Korea’s Kospi index, the world’s best-performing major equity benchmark this year, climbed 3% after a volatile start that saw it drop to near a technical bear market. Shares of Samsung Electronics Co. climbed 6.8% following a report that Anthropic PBC is in talks with the Korean company to manufacture a custom artificial intelligence chip. Treasury futures edged higher in Asia after weaker-than-expected US June employment data and lower oil prices challenged expectations for Fed rate hikes. There’s no cash trading in Treasuries worldwide on Friday due to a US holiday. The dollar weakened against most of its major peers. Friday’s equity gains offered some relief after a selloff in tech stocks, particularly chipmakers, fueled concerns that the AI-driven rally may have gone too far, too fast. Even so, confidence in the technology’s long-term potential remains strong, with investors focused on whether earnings growth can justify lofty valuations and the billions of dollars being invested in AI infrastructure. The rebound in Asia came after semiconductor stocks in the US started the third quarter with their biggest two-day selloff in nearly a month. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, which gained a record 88% last quarter, fell 5% on Thursday. That brought its two-session decline to 12%, the most since June 5. Elsewhere, gold rose for a third day as the weak US jobs numbers eased Fed rate-hike bets. The non-yielding metal, which is less attractive when rates are increased, gained as much as 1.8% to $4,195.39 an ounce. Silver climbed 2.2% to $62.25 an ounce. Platinum and palladium also advanced. Brent crude steadied in thin trading as tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz increased, adding to a gush of near-term supply while talks between the US and Iran continue. The commodity traded near $72 a barrel. Earlier, data showed the US labor market cooled in June, reinforcing expectations the Fed can afford to be patient on interest rates. Nonfarm payrolls increased 57,000 last month after downward revisions to the prior two months took some of the shine off recent blockbuster reports, Bureau of Labor Statistics data Thursday showed. The unemployment rate fell to 4.2% as labor force participation plunged. Traders pared back expectations for additional Fed rate hikes, though they continued to price in at least one increase this year.

Nikkei +1.12% Hang Seng +1.14% CSI +1.09% Kospi +5.66% Shanghai +0.69% Shenzen +1.40%

Eur$ 1.1440 CNH 6.7849 CNY 6.7819 JPY 161.20 GBP 1.3359 CHF 0.8029 RUB 77.5723 TRY 47.7984 WTI$ 69.02 Gold 4,177 +1.44% BTC 61,299 -0.33% ETH 1,703 -0.07%

S&P +0.34% Nasdaq +0.87% EuroStoxx +0.39% FTSE +0.10% Dax +0.53% SMI -0.05%

Macro :
- JPMorgan Says Saylor’s Strategy Adds New Risk to Bitcoin Market
- Michael Burry Shorts Micron Shares, Adds to Long Positions
- German Reform Plan Could Lift 2027 GDP Above 1%, Merz Says
- Putin’s Choice for $60 Billion Space Revival Uses Musk as Model
- ‘Dark’ Trading Is Doing a Lot of Damage in Europe: Chris Hughes

Keep an eye on :
- AIR FP : Airbus Delivered 350 Planes in First Half Amid Supply Chain Woes
- AKRBP NO : Aker BP 2Q Avg Production Meets Estimates
- Anthropic IPO : Anthropic Moves to Close Loopholes on China Claude Access: FT
- ATRLJB SS : Atrium Ljungberg 2Q Rental Income Beats Estimates
- BATS LN : Reynolds Defends Its FDA-Reviewed E-Cigarettes
- BG US : Bunge Confirms Defunct Ukraine Grain Silo Damaged by Strike
- CRW LN : Craneware Sees Earnings Below Market Expectations
- Crusoe : Crusoe in Talks for $3 Billion Round That May Triple Valuation
- ENGI FP : Engie to Build Over 400km of Power Transmission Lines in Peru
- RF FP : Eurazeo Sells Stake in FST Hotels to Extendam
- GTT FP : GTT Gets Order for Tank Design of One New LNG Carrier
- HBR LN : Harbour Energy Holder Offers About 54.8m Shares, Terms Show
- LMT US : Lockheed Martin in lead to buy naval tech group Ultra Maritime
- Londia n IPO : Chinese EV Battery Parts Maker Londian Files for US IPO
- META US : Zuckerberg Says AI Agent Work Hasn’t Advanced as Expected: Rtrs
- MIPS SS : Mips to Pay $3.25m as Part of Settlement With BrainGuard
- OCDO LN : Ocado shareholders call for removal of chair Adam Warby
- PIRC IM : Strnad, Tykac Mull Buying Pirelli Shares From Sinochem: Corriere
- PLX FP : Pluxee 3Q Organic Revenue Beats Estimates
- R3NK GY : Renk Group Is Said to Near Deal to Buy UK’s David Brown Defence
- RHM GY : Rheinmetall to Assess F126 Cancellation Impact on 2026 Guidance
- RHM GY : Rheinmetall Is Evaluating Loss of Warship Contract: Street Wrap
- SPCX US : Trump: Think Musk Will Donate SpaceX Stock to Trump Accounts
- SPOT US : Spotify Challenges Prediction Markets After Song Chart Rigging
- SUMMA SS : Summa Defence Says Finnish Defence Revokes Procurement Decision

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 4th of July 2026

>>> Up
* Close Brothers Raised to Buy at Shore Capital; PT 495 pence
* Deutsche Bank PT Raised to 41 euros from 40 euros at JPMorgan
* GEA Group Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 70 euros
* JM Raised to Buy at ABG; PT 160 kronor
* Maersk Raised to Neutral at Goldman; PT 16,000 kroner
* Novonesis Raised to Neutral at BNP Paribas; PT 415 kroner
* Novonesis ADRs Raised to Neutral at BNP Paribas; PT $63
* Tele2 Raised to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 173 kronor
* Tesla PT Raised to $430 from $400 at Truist Secs

>>> Down
* Bucher Cut to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 340 Swiss francs
* Gjensidige Cut to Hold at Pareto Securities; PT 290 kroner
* Repsol Cut to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 24 euros
* Stellantis Cut to Reduce at HSBC

>>> Initiation
* ARM Holdings ADRs Rated New Buy at SPDB Intl HK; PT $397
* Brooks Macdonald Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT 1,600 pence
* Navamedic Rated New Buy at Nordea; PT 21 kroner

>>> Call
* Citi Cautious on Alternative Asset Managers, EQT Negative Watch
* Galp Raised, Repsol Cut at Morgan Stanley, Favor Defensive Plays