FT : European aviation: winter blues blow airlines off course

European aviation: winter blues blow airlines off course
Facing higher fuel costs and new fines for delays, several low-cost carriers have gone out of business. More consolidation is likely

It was midday on October 1 when Anders Ludvigsson found out that Primera, the small European airline he worked for, had just 12 hours before it was due to declare itself bankrupt. There was a mid-afternoon meeting where office staff were told, and five minutes later the news leaked to crew members through WhatsApp and Facebook. Flights ceased at midnight.

“We had been in trouble since I joined,” says Mr Ludvigsson, a former director of flight operations who had started at Primera in 2006 as a pilot. “There was always some sort of crisis coming up.” 

The financial crisis, tumbling eurozone economies, the soaring oil price: Europe’s airlines have not been immune to shocks in the past decade, least of all the smaller ones. 

Like other low-cost carriers, Primera prided itself on its nimble business model, which gave it an advantage over older airlines. “We could open up small bases with the same quality, without having infrastructure in place,” says Mr Ludvigsson. “We opened and closed routes very freely. If they didn’t work out, we closed them.” But that flexibility could not protect it against unexpected blows, including corrosion on one of its aircraft and delayed deliveries of others. 

Then Primera ran into a new wave of problems. At the same time as cancelled flights over the summer required passenger compensation, jet fuel was nearly double the price of the previous year. The airline had needed to risk expanding, he says, because “being static is slowly shrinking”. But it was “a gamble that didn’t come off”. 

With the Christmas travel season in full swing, a number of other airlines in Europe are facing similar dilemmas. They have tried to expand rapidly in a market that has seen a flurry of new entrants and different business models. 

Europe’s consumers have enjoyed the benefits of a booming aviation industry, with the number of flights rising by 44 per cent to 38.1m in 2018 from a decadeago, according to the International Air Transport Association, and fares falling as low-cost carriers flourished across the continent. Ryanair’s average ticket price, for example, fell from €45 in 2012 to €39.40 in 2018.

But that success has started to breed its own problems for airlines as troubles ranging from a higher oil price to congested skies start to pick off the weaker carriers. Behind them stand Europe’s largest airlines, keen to consolidate and strengthen their grip on the market. Events like last week’s closure of the UK’s Gatwick airport after drones were sighted in the area, leaving thousands of passengers stranded, will not help.

Winter is a “horrendous” period for airlines, when a seasonal lull means that receipts are low but bills are high, says Gert Zonneveld, analyst at Canaccord Genuity. “When airlines go bust, they tend to go bust towards the end of the year . . . because that’s when the cash balances are the lowest.” The struggle for some is to survive until spring, when bookings increase. 


The first big warning sign appeared last year, when three large European carriers went bankrupt in quick succession: Monarch in the UK; Air Berlin; and Alitalia. The last of these is still flying with the backing of the Italian government, potentially contravening EU state aid rules, but it awaits a new owner.

This autumn, a number of smaller airlines failed. As well as Latvia-based Primera, Cobalt of Cyprus, Germany’s Azurair, Lithuania’s Small Planet Airlines and the Swiss SkyWork all went out of business. 

Two further carriers have had precarious experiences: UK regional airline Flybe, which put itself up for sale in November after poor results, and Iceland’s Wow Air, which hastily agreed to a takeover by Icelandair only for it to fall through and a private equity buyer to step in. Norwegian has also had a volatile time, rebuffing takeover offers from IAG, owner of British Airways.

Aviation experts believe that the pressure on the sector is only going to intensify, as seasonal factors combine with macroeconomic problems. 

The high price of jet fuel is a recurrent factor in recent bankruptcies. Although the price has recently fallen back to around $75 a barrel, it has spent most of this year between $80 and $90 and came close to $100 in early October. Eighteen months earlier, it had been as low as $50. S&P Global Platts, a data provider, has estimated that the elevated price has added $48.6bn to airlines’ 2018 fuel bill, compared with last year. 

Airlines have also cited the cost of new European compensation regulations for passengers as a factor. Jozsef Varadi, chief executive of Hungary-based Wizz Air, now one of Europe’s “big six” airlines, says the “squeeze in the marketplace” comes from both fuel costs and the new compensation system. “Those who are not viable from a financial standpoint cannot live up to the challenge,” he adds.

The industry faced a big bill for the disruption caused by congestion over Europe’s skies this summer — the worst on record. In July, Europe’s travellers experienced more than 135,000 minutes of in-flight delays  on average each day. Put another way, that was 94 days’ worth of delays every day — more than double the year before.

Industrial action by French air traffic controllers and ground-handling staff, as well as a lack of air traffic control capacity and extreme weather — from the “Beast from the East” snowstorms in February to summer’s heatwave — all contributed to these delays. Individual airlines added their own problems: Ryanair had to deal with days of strikes by pilots and cabin crew as part of a continent-wide industrial dispute.

Michel Dembinski, who is regional head of aviation in Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s structured finance office, says the industry is paying attention to “a number of indicators in a ‘heat map’ to monitor changes”, including interest rates, aircraft lease rates and fuel costs. “If they start showing too much stress, an adverse reaction may lead to restrictions in capital liquidity and weaker cash flows for airlines. The weaker airlines will be the first impacted.”

Jarrod Castle, analyst at UBS, believes a turn in the cycle is not far off. “Airlines’ valuations are saying we’re going into another financial crisis,” he says.

The fate of one airline has been played out very publicly. When Icelandair announced it wanted to take over its national rival, Wow Air, in an all-stock deal  worth $25m, at the start of November, it already seemed like a comedown for Wow, whose founder had said he was expecting to raise $200m-$300m in an initial public offering within 18 months.

At the time, the industry was still heralding Wow, which won the title of low-cost airline of the year at the Centre for Aviation awards in Berlin in November. Announcing the prize, Capa’s executive chairman, Peter Harbison, said: “It is a mark of Wow Air’s success that its biggest and closest competitor’s only response is to buy it.”

The airline was praised “for pioneering the long-haul, low-cost” model, using its Reykjavik hub to connect 20 destinations in Europe and North America. However, some of those routes are lossmaking, given Wow’s low fares. It will charge, for example, £130 to fly from New York Newark to London Gatwick from next month, though its business model expects that passengers will add pricier “ancillaries” such as carry-on bags and extra legroom.

But two days after the ceremony, Icelandair cancelled the deal, having received a due diligence report on Wow. Bogi Nils Bogason, chief executive of Icelandair Group, said the result was “certainly disappointing”, while Skuli Mogensen, Wow’s chief executive and founder, said it had been a “challenging project”. Icelandair’s own shares fell almost a quarter in the following week.


The deal’s collapse put Wow at risk, given that it had already announced a profit warning in a letter to bondholders and complained about creditors “demanding stricter payment terms than before, further putting pressure on our cash flow”. It had issued €60m of bonds in September but with a high interest rate of 9 per cent.

In the letter, Mr Mogensen indicated how precarious Wow’s survival was, saying “funding initiatives” had become “a necessity for the business” on top of the bonds. He said he had invested €5.5m cash in the bond “as I was convinced the funding would be sufficient to take us to an IPO in the next 18 months”, but the airline needed more money.

The day after the deal collapsed, private equity firm Indigo Partners, which already owns Hungary’s Wizz Air and Mexico’s Volaris Airlines, offered to invest  in Wow. The parties did not disclose terms, except to say Mr Mogensen would remain the principal shareholder. The announcement could not have come at a better time for Wow. Mr Mogensen “really desperately needs to be able to put out some news like that, that somebody else is coming in”, says one Icelandic analyst.

When airlines fail, their brands may disappear but their assets are often snapped up by stronger players — and consolidation is something Europe’s bigger airlines are keen to see.

In the US, after mergers, acquisitions and the failure of smaller rivals, four airlines control 80 per cent of the domestic market by seats; in Europe, by contrast, even the top 10 airline groups can only muster 70 per cent. North American airlines have reaped the benefit of this consolidation: their margins for earnings before interest and tax have gone from 3.4 per cent in 2012 to 11 per cent in 2017, according to Iata. In Europe, that was 0.7 per cent in 2012 and 6.9 per cent last year.

Daniel Roeska, an analyst at Bernstein, says the industry is reaching a cyclical peak and “smaller airlines will fail more rapidly over the next two years”, given their bloated fuel bills, creating “consolidation opportunities in the European sector”.

Mr Castle at UBS says there is a coherence to consolidation. “It’s not like the capacity doesn’t get redeployed in some manner when things improve. Slots get taken over. The planes might go somewhere else. What you do see after each downturn is more consolidation of profits: the big ones get stronger.”

Consolidation helps solve one problem: overcapacity. In the fourth quarter of 2018, Europe’s low-cost carriers planned to increase the number of seats by 11 per cent, and the continent’s overall seat count by 7.7 per cent. Those numbers are actually decreases on previous plans: airline after airline announced it would grow more slowly, allowing it to protect its yields and pass on some of the higher fuel bills.

“If you look at the European market, there’s too much supply,” says Mark Manduca, an analyst at Citi. “We see the small guys looking for working capital, deferred revenue, prepayments, cash on the balance sheet.”

Carsten Spohr, chief executive of Lufthansa, told the Financial Times in November that the airline industry needed to give up the “fantasy of growth going on forever” after a summer of strikes, delays and cancellations. He says aviation capacity in Europe, measured by the number of seats, had increased about 6 per cent a year since 2016. This exceeds the industry’s broad guide for sustainable growth of twice gross domestic product, which has recently been 2 per cent in Europe.

Problems with airspace, airports and delivery of aircraft show that “this industry has reached its maximum growth rate”, says Mr Spohr. “What we need is healthy growth in line with infrastructure and manufacturers’ capacity and airline capacity. 

“We can’t excuse ourselves, we are part of it.”

>>> What to look at today - 24th of December 2018

Asian equities were mixed, while U.S. stock futures climbed and the dollar fell as investors weighed news over the weekend that President Donald Trump has discussed firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell as well as the impact of a partial U.S. government shutdown. The yen pared its earlier advance.
Stocks declined in Hong Kong and South Korea, while those in China and Australia rose. U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin attempted to assurefinancial markets that Powell would not be ousted from the central bank following a Bloomberg News report that said Trump has repeatedly discussed removing him. Mnuchin tweeted over the weekend that he had spoken with the president about the matter and quoted Trump as saying he never suggested firing Powell, nor does he think he has the right to do so.

Nikkei Closed Hang Seng -0.40% CSI -0.1% Shanghai +0.17% Shenzen +0.54%

Eur$ 1.1382 CNH 6.8987 CNY 6.8966 JPY 111.10 GBP 1.2662 CHF 0.9939 RUB 68.5503 TRY 5.3083 WTI$ 45.75 +0.35%

S&P +0.61% EuroStoxx Closed FTSE -0.55% DAx Closed SMI Closed

Macro :
- Trump Said to Discuss Firing Fed’s Powell After Latest Rate Hike
- Le Pen’s RN Would Lead French Vote in EU Elections W/ 24%: Odoxa
- *VIX RISES TO 31.35, HIGHEST LEVEL SINCE FEBRUARY 9

Keep an eye on :
- ABIO FP : Albioma To Buy 60% Stake in Generation Unit From Jalles Machado
- AGRO SS : Agromino-Mabon Offer Unconditional After Condition Completed
- APR FP : April Says French Authorities Propose EU69.8m Tax Charge
- BAVA DC : Bavarian Says FDA Accepted BLA for MVA-BN Smallpox Vaccine
- BBVA SM : BBVA Gets ECB Approval for Appointments, Chairman’s Revised Role
- BP/ LN : BP Sold U.S. Wind Energy Assets to Ares Amid Restructuring
- CRG IM : Carige Receives ECB Approval for Capital Increase Up to EU400m
- DBV FP : DBV Tech Erases Late Surge After Aimmune Files With FDA Post-Mkt
- DB1 GY : Deutsche Borse Fined for Alleged Insider Trading Case
- DIA SM : Dia expects to sign refinancing agreement next week
- EDP PL : EDP Renovaveis Sells Stakes in Two U.S. Wind Projects for $400m
- ENEL IM : Enel Green Power Sells 50% of Joint Venture EF Solare to F2i
- NXT FP : Euronext Has Approached Oslo Bors Board With EU625m Cash Offer
- FAG SS : Fagerhult to Buy Iguzzini Illuminazione; Plans Rights Issue
- FCX US : Rio Tinto CEO plays down M&A activity for 2019 -- RIO AU +2.06%
- FTK GY : FinTech Group Bank Reports EU6m Loan-Loss Provision
- MBWS FP : Marie Brizard Widens Asset Sales, COFEPP to Raise Shareholding
- MRK GY : Merck KGaA & Pfizer End Javelin Ovarian 100 Trial of Avelumab
- MIR SS : Miris Human Milk Analyzer Cleared by U.S. Regulators
- OUT1V FH : Utokumpu Has Signed Two New Loan Pacts of EU200m
- PIX FP : Pixium Vision: Pixium Vision Establishes a new Equity Line Financing with Kepler Cheuvreux
- RBS LN : RBS Seeks German Banking Licence as Brexit Deadline Looms: FT
- RNO FP : Carlos Ghosn to Be Detained Until Jan 1: Tokyo Court Says
- RNO FP : Nissan Asks Staff to Avoid Contacting Ghosn, Kelly Amid Probe --> Nissan : Closed
- RIO LN : Rio Tinto CEO plays down M&A activity for 2019 -- RIO AU +2.06%
- STAN LN : U.S. Extends StanChart Sanctions Oversight Until End of March
- SDRY LN :
- TEVA IT : Teva Says FDA Approves Proair Digihaler for Asthma and COPD
- FP FP : Argentina Authorizes YPF, Total Extra NatGas Exports to Chile
- FP FP : Total Fined EU500,000 by Paris Criminal Court in Iran Case (1)
- UBSG SW : UBS to Pay $68 Million for Manipulating Interest Rates
- VLA FP : Valneva’s VLA1553 Gets FDA Fast Track Designation
- DG FP : Vinci Airports Raises €420m Loans for Belgrade Concession
- WTB LN : Whitbread Sale of Costa to Coca-Cola Gets EC Clearance
- WIHN SW : Wisekey Sells Some Quovadis Ops to DigiCert for $45m

>>> Rio Tinto CEO plays down M&A activity for 2019

Rio Tinto CEO plays down M&A activity for 2019
24 DEC 2018
Rio Tinto [LON, ASX:RIO] Chief Executive Jean-Sebastien Jacques attempted to minimise expectations of M&A activity by the Anglo-Australian mining group next year, FT.com reported. Jacques said the company has a few non-core assets remaining but has already completed the majority of its divestments.
In the last two years the business has disposed of assets worth USD 11bn, the report noted.
The company has yet to decide how to spend USD 3.5bn it made from selling a stake in the Indonesian copper mine Grasberg but will make the decision before February’s scheduled annual results presentation, Jacques said. Analysts anticipate a shareholder payout rather than further acquisitions, the item reported.
The CEO went on to say that there are currently few beneficial opportunities for acquisitions, although the situation is being monitored. The uncertainty of the current environment means investors are less concerned with growth, he said.
Rio has recently been tipped as a potential acquirer of the USD 15bn US mining group Freeport-McMoRan [NYSE:FCX], the report noted.

>>> What to look at this Week-End - 22nd & 23rd of December 2018

Weekly Market Update: Fed Chair Spooks Already Fragile Markets Fearing a Slowdown
The quarter and year drew mercifully towards a close in what was another bruising week for investors. Concerns surrounding global growth heading into 2019 lingered amid heightened speculation on just how much the US Fed would incorporate those worries into their rate policy statement on Wednesday. Another string of weak economic readings, particularly in core Europe and China, along with some deceleration evident in the US economy only exacerbated that trepidation and manifested itself in downward moves for global equities and commodities, most notably continued pressure on crude oil prices. Wednesday’s FOMC statement failed to meet mounting dovish expectations and Chairman Powell’s press conference delivery further underwhelmed those same investors. The Chairman emphasized the Fed would remain data dependent into 2019 and at this point most FOMC members now forecast two hikes next year rather than three given the strength of the US economy. Dovish tweaks to the statement language and the press conference itself did nothing to change sentiment and investors resumed selling stocks. US indices plumbed through the February lows, the NASDAQ officially fell into bear market territory, and the Transports careened lower, further worrying Dow theorists. Dysfunction in Washington DC didn’t help either as the President and Congress veered towards a government shutdown as the two sides fought over funding for the Mexico border wall. Gold prices rose above the 200 day moving average and the VIX jumped above 30 for the first time since February. The S&P500 had its worst week since 2011, falling 7.1% and the Russell 2000 was down 8.2%. The DJIA and Nasdaq had their worst week since 2008, plunging 6.9% and 8.4%, respectively. In corporate news this week, Nike jumped after reporting results. FedEx crystalized concerns about international growth. Pfizer and Glaxo announced they would combine their consumer businesses, creating an over-the-counter-drug monolith. Qualcomm won a ruling against Apple in a Munich Court that would ban the sale of some iPhone models in Germany. Jack in the Box announced it was exploring strategic alternatives and has spoken with potential buyers, though no timelines for a deal are known. The Malaysian government lodged criminal charges against Goldman Sachs and said it would seek $7.5B in damages from the American bank over allegedly fraudulent dealings with the state development fund 1MDB.

Macro :
- Trump Said to Discuss Firing Fed’s Powell After Latest Rate Hike
- Le Pen’s RN Would Lead French Vote in EU Elections W/ 24%: Odoxa
- *VIX RISES TO 31.35, HIGHEST LEVEL SINCE FEBRUARY 9

Keep an eye on :
- ABIO FP : Albioma To Buy 60% Stake in Generation Unit From Jalles Machado
- AGRO SS : Agromino-Mabon Offer Unconditional After Condition Completed
- BAVA DC : Bavarian Says FDA Accepted BLA for MVA-BN Smallpox Vaccine
- BBVA SM : BBVA Gets ECB Approval for Appointments, Chairman’s Revised Role
- BP/ LN : BP Sold U.S. Wind Energy Assets to Ares Amid Restructuring
- CRG IM : Carige Receives ECB Approval for Capital Increase Up to EU400m
- DBV FP : DBV Tech Erases Late Surge After Aimmune Files With FDA Post-Mkt
- DB1 GY : Deutsche Borse Fined for Alleged Insider Trading Case
- DIA SM : Dia expects to sign refinancing agreement next week
- EDP PL : EDP Renovaveis Sells Stakes in Two U.S. Wind Projects for $400m
- ENEL IM : Enel Green Power Sells 50% of Joint Venture EF Solare to F2i
- FAG SS : Fagerhult to Buy Iguzzini Illuminazione; Plans Rights Issue
- FTK GY : FinTech Group Bank Reports EU6m Loan-Loss Provision
- MRK GY : Merck KGaA & Pfizer End Javelin Ovarian 100 Trial of Avelumab
- MIR SS : Miris Human Milk Analyzer Cleared by U.S. Regulators
- OUT1V FH : Utokumpu Has Signed Two New Loan Pacts of EU200m
- RNO FP : Carlos Ghosn to Be Detained Until Jan 1: Tokyo Court Says
- STAN LN : U.S. Extends StanChart Sanctions Oversight Until End of March
- SDRY LN :
- TEVA IT : Teva Says FDA Approves Proair Digihaler for Asthma and COPD
- FP FP : Argentina Authorizes YPF, Total Extra NatGas Exports to Chile
- FP FP : Total Fined EU500,000 by Paris Criminal Court in Iran Case (1)
- UBSG SW : UBS to Pay $68 Million for Manipulating Interest Rates
- VLA FP : Valneva’s VLA1553 Gets FDA Fast Track Designation
- DG FP : Vinci Airports Raises €420m Loans for Belgrade Concession
- WTB LN : Whitbread Sale of Costa to Coca-Cola Gets EC Clearance

TechCrunch: How Juul made vaping viral to become worth a dirty $38 billion

How Juul made vaping viral to become worth a dirty $38 billion
The tricks to addictive product design

A Juul is not a cigarette. It’s much easier than that. Through devilishly slick product design I’ll discuss here, the startup has massively lowered the barrier to getting hooked on nicotine. Juul has dismantled every deterrent to taking a puff.

The result is both a new $38 billion valuation thanks to a $12.8 billion investment from Marlboro Cigarettes-maker Altria this week, and an explosion in popularity of vaping amongst teenagers and the rest of the population. Game recognize game, and Altria’s game is nicotine addiction. It knows it’s been one-upped by Juul’s tactics, so it’s hedged its own success by handing the startup over a tenth of the public corporation’s market cap in cash.

Juul argues it can help people switch from obviously dangerous smoking to supposedly healthier vaping. But in reality, the tiny aluminum device helps people switch from nothing to vaping…which can lead some to start smoking the real thing. A study found it causes more people to pick up cigarettes than put them down. It estimated that in 2015, 2,070 cigarette-smoking adults quit with help from vaping, but 168,000 teens and young adults who used e-cigarettes eventually started smoking real cigarettes daily.

How fast has Juul swept the nation? Nielsen says it controls 75 percent of the U.S. e-cigarette market up from 27 percent in September last year. In the year since then, the CDC says the percentage of high school students who’ve used an e-cigarette in the last 30 days has grown 75 percent. That’s 3 million teens or roughly 20 percent of all high school kids. CNBC reports that Juul 2018 revenue could be around $1.5 billion.

The health consequences aside, Juul makes it radically simple to pick up a lifelong vice. Parents, regulators, and potential vapers need to understand why Juul works so well if they’ll have any hope of suppressing its temptations.

Shareable
It’s tough to try a cigarette for the first time. The heat and smoke burn your throat. The taste is harsh and overwhelming. The smell coats your fingers and clothes, marking you as smoker. There’s pressure to smoke a whole one lest you waste the tobacco. Even if you want to try a friend’s, they have to ignite one first. And unlike bigger box mod vaporizers where you customize the temperature and e-juice, Juul doesn’t make you look like some dorky hardcore vapelord.

Juul is much more gentle on your throat. The taste is more mild and can be masked with flavors. The vapor doesn’t stain you with a smell as quickly. You can try just a single puff from a friend’s at a bar or during a smoking break with no pressure to inhale more. The elegant, discrete form factor doesn’t brand you as a serious vape users. It’s casual. Yet the public gesture and clouds people exhale are still eye-catching enough to trigger the questions, “What’s that? Can I try?” There’s a whole other article to be written about how Juul memes and Instagram Stories that glamorized the nicotine dispensers contributed to the device’s spread.

And perhaps most insidiously, vaping seems healthier. A lifetime of anti-smoking ads and warning labels drilled the dangers into our heads. But how much harm could a little vapor do? Well, nicotine and other chemicals in the vapor can impair blood vessel dilation, increase arterial stiffness, increase blood pressure and heart rate, and hurt the lungs by being toxic to alveolar macrophage. Even if it’s not as bad as cigarettes, vaping is still dangerous, and it doesn’t necessarily stop people from burning tobacco.

A study found only 10 percent of former smokers who turned to vaping had actually quit cigarettes after a year. My friend who had never smoked tells me they burn through a full Juul pod per day now. Someone got him to try a single puff at a nightclub. Soon he was asking for drag off of strangers’ Juuls. Then he bought one and never looked back. He’d been around cigarettes at parties his whole life but never got into them. Juul made it too effortless to resist.

Concealable
Lighting up a cigarette is a garish activity prohibited in many places. Not so with discretely sipping from a Juul.

Cigarettes often aren’t allowed to be smoked inside. Hiding it is no easy feat and can get you kicked out. You need to have a lighter and play with fire to get one started. They can get crushed or damp in your pocket. The burning tip makes them unruly in tight quarters, and the bud or falling ash can damage clothing and make a mess. You smoke a cigarette because you really want to smoke a cigarette.

Public establishments are still figuring out how to handle Juuls and other vaporizers. Many places that ban smoking don’t explicitly do the same for vaping. The less stinky vapor and more discrete motion makes it easy to hide. Beyond airplanes, you could probably play dumb and say you didn’t know the rules if you did get caught. The metal stick is hard to break. You won’t singe anyone. There’s no mess, need for an ashtray, or holes in your jackets or couches.

As long as your battery is charged, there’s no need for extra equipment and you won’t draw attention like with a lighter. Battery life is a major concern for heavy Juulers that smokers don’t have worry about, but I know people who now carry a giant portable charger just to keep their Juul alive. But there’s also a network effect that’s developing. Similar to iPhone cords, Juuls are becoming common enough that you can often conveniently borrow a battery stick or charger from another user.

And again, the modular ability to take as few or as many puffs as you want lets you absent-mindedly Juul at any moment. At your desk, on the dance floor, as you drive, or even in bed. A friend’s nieces and nephews say that they see fellow teens Juul in class by concealing it in the cuff of their sleeve. No kid would be so brazen as to try smoke in cigarette in the middle of a math lesson.

Distributable
Gillette pioneered the brilliant razor and blade business model. Buy the sometimes-discounted razor, and you’re compelled to keep buying the expensive proprietary blades. Dollar Shave Club leveled up the strategy by offering a subscription that delivers the consumable blades to your door. Juul combines both with a product that’s physically addictive.

When you finish a pack of cigarettes, you could be done smoking. There’s nothing left. But with Juul you’ve still got the $35 battery pack when you finish vaping a pod. There’s a sunk cost fallacy goading you to keep buying the pods to get the most out of your investment and stay locked into the Juul ecosystem.

One of Juul’s sole virality disadvantages compared to cigarettes is that they’re not as ubiquitously available. Some stores that sells cigs just don’t carry them yet. But more and more shops are picking them up, which will continue with Altria’s help. And Juul offers an “auto-ship” delivery option that knocks $2 off the $16 pack of four pods so you don’t even have to think about buying more. Catch the urge to quit? Well you’ve got pods on the way so you might as well use them. Whether due to regulation or a lack of innovation, I couldn’t find subscription delivery options for traditional cigarettes.

And for minors that want to buy Juuls or Juul pods illegally, their tiny size makes them easy to smuggle and resell. A recent South Park episode featured warring syndicates of fourth-graders selling Juul pods to even younger kids.

Dishonorable
Juul co-founder James Monsees told the San Jose Mercury News that “The first phase is proving the value and creating a product that makes cigarettes obsolete.” But notice he didn’t say Juul wants to make nicotine obsolete or reduce the number of people addicted to it.

If Juul actually cared about fighting addiction, it’d offer a regimen for weaning yourself off of nicotine. Yet it doesn’t sell low-dose or no-dose pods that could help people quit entirely. In the US it only sells 5% and 3% nicotine versions. It does make 1.7% pods for foreign markets like Israel where that’s the maximum legal strengths, though refuses to sell them in the States. Along with taking over $12 billion from one of the largest cigarette companies, that makes the mission statement ring hollow.

Juul is the death stick business as usual, but strengthened by the product design and virality typically reserved for Apple and Facebook.

>>> Trussardi sale to QuattroR virtually closed

Trussardi sale to QuattroR virtually closed - report (translated)
23 DEC 2018
The sale of Trussardi, the privately held Italian fashion house, to QuattroR, a turnaround fund controlled by state-owned Italian financial holding Cassa Depositi e Prestiti (CdP), has been effectively agreed, Italian-language daily MF Fashion and most of the rest of the Italian press reported.
The unsourced report said that the deal had been virtually closed after doubts over the agreement among Trussardi's creditor banks, BNL, Unicredit, UBI Banca,Intesa Sanpaolo and Banco BPM, were overcome.
The item noted that the creditor banks provided Trussardi with EUR 51.5m in financing in March 2018.
The report claimed that QuattroR is to receive an 80% stake in Trussardi via a capital increase of EUR 50m.

>>> Jaguar Land Rover owner assures UK PM of long-term intent; Geely denies take

Jaguar Land Rover owner assures UK PM of long-term intent; Geely denies takeover interest

Jaguar Land Rover’s owner, India-based Tata Sons, has informed British prime minister Theresa May it has no plans to sell the UK-based car business, The Sunday Times reported. Tata chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran wrote to May to assure her of the Indian company’s long-term ownership and plans for continued investment in the business, the report said.
Sources said the assurance was intended to assuage any fears over Tata’s commitment to its British operations, with an eye to future government backing for driverless and electric technology, as well as a planned battery plant to be constructed in the Midlands, the item reported.
Tata paid USD 2.3bn (then GBP 1.15bn) to acquire JLR from Ford [NYSE:F] a decade ago. Despite turning the business around, JLR has suffered in the past few months amid falling consumer confidence, a plummeting market in China, declining sales of diesel and Brexit uncertainty, the report pointed out.
The company has also been the topic of takeover speculation, with China-based GeelyAutomobile [HKG:0175] tipped as a potential acquirer, the item noted. Chandrasekaran’s letter is thought also to have been aimed at defusing that chatter, the report said.
Geely yesterday said it has not entered discussions with Tata and is not interested in the acquisition of JLR, the item reported. Tata confirmed JLR is not for sale and did not wish to discuss the letter, the report said.
The original article appeared in The Sunday Times, Business & Money section, pages 1, 2

Barron's : Where To Hunt for Treasures in European Stocks

Where To Hunt for Treasures in European Stocks

Investors are sweating the U.S. market’s fourth-quarter correction, but across the Atlantic they’re coping with a bear market. If you dig around in the foreign rubble, however, there are potential buried gems with long-term value.

During market slides, European indexes often fall further than their U.S. counterparts. Broadly, Continental companies tend to be less efficient, have lower margins, and operate in highly regulated domestic labor markets. What’s different lately is “the growing uncertainty” about Europe, notes Mustafa Sagun, chief financial officer of Principal Global Equities.

Stocks of some attractive Old World global companies with good businesses have been whacked hard and overly penalized, he argues. In the United Kingdom, the Brexit saga weighs on markets, while French shares have softened in response to populist protests. Italian stocks have sagged as Rome and the European Union engage in a high-profile battle over the budget deficit.

Besides that, says Harry Hartford, president of Causeway Capital Management, “Markets over there offer many fewer fast-growing tech stocks. And in 2018, for example, U.S. corporate bottom lines benefited significantly from tax reform.”


Nevertheless, some European companies are global, with stable, if cyclical, businesses that have attractive longer-term prospects, and relatively low price/earnings ratios. For a long-term investor who wants to diversify and harvest 3% to 4% dividend yields, there are diamonds in the rough.

Unlike U.S. shares, Old World stocks are already in a bear market, which began after April 15, 2015, when the Stoxx Europe 600 index hit an all-time high of 414.06. The index fell by more than 25%, to 303.58, by Feb. 11, 2016, when world markets were hit by China trade worries. Sound familiar? At last Friday’s close of 336.67, the Stoxx 600 remains in the bear’s grip.

Barron’s asked portfolio managers to name some high-quality stocks with good fundamentals that the macro scenarios are unduly discounting. And, hey, a nice dividend yield wouldn’t hurt, either. We found five large-caps with stable-to-good growth prospects and generally healthy balance sheets. The stocks in the nearby table are well-known global names in diverse industries with valuations that typically are lower than those of their U.S.-based rivals.

John Petrides, a portfolio manager at Point View Wealth Management, says his firm is investing in two themes: Continental companies that don’t depend exclusively on what goes on in Europe, and attractive stock dividend-yield opportunities caused by the selloff. In our small sample, the dividends run about 3% to 4%, higher than the average 2.2% of the members of the S&P 500 index. (How much investors actually wind up with depends on withholding taxes, which differ by country.)

Shares of U.K.-domiciled oil giant BP (ticker: BP) have tumbled to $37.63, more than 20% under 2018’s high, as crude-oil prices have fallen about 40% in the past 90 days, to about $45.40 a barrel. BP stock price is down to the level of the late 1990s. “The fears of Brexit have exacerbated an already difficult industry environment,” says Petrides. Yet BP is one of a few dominant integrated oil majors, with a diverse array of businesses around the world, he says. It’s a high-quality stock with a better-than-6% dividend.

“The fears about Brexit” are overdone, and, on a two-to-three-year view, BP’s shares are attractive, the portfolio chief adds. Both Petrides and his company own the stock.

Recently, he also bought shares of Germany’s BASF (BASFY), one of the world’s biggest chemical outfits. “It’s the DowDuPont [DWDP] of Europe,” he says. It’s cyclically sensitive, so a Chinese slowdown is a headwind, but the stock price has almost been halved, to $17.06, and sells at a discount to DowDuPont. With a 5% dividend yield, it won’t take much to get a double-digit return.

Martin Leclerc, a principal at Barrack Yard Advisors, is also selectively bullish on Europe. One of his favorites is Germany’s Henkel (HENKY), which makes everything from adhesives to plastic bottles to beauty-care products. At about $96.58, it trades at 13 times 2019 consensus earnings estimates, versus about 17 times for 3M (MMM), even though Henkel is comparable, he says. The company has raised its dividend an average of 16% annually over the past five years.

For similar reasons, Leclerc likes France’s Danone (DANOY), a food-processor, dairy, and nutrition operation with a global footprint, and Compagnie Financière Richemont (CFRUY), the biggest luxury firm you’ve never heard of.

Danone has repositioned its product portfoliobri to meet changing consumer tastes, moving to more organic and nutritional offerings. It trades at a P/E of 16 times, versus a long-term average of 21.

As for Richemont, which owns high-end jewelry brands, including Van Cleef & Arpels and Cartier, he says, “At around $6.14, the stock is going begging,” down almost a third from over $9 just four months ago. Yet the Swiss luxury company has no net debt and sports a P/E about 25% below its long-term average.

There are many clouds over Europe, but for these five stocks, the Continent is just one part of the overall picture. Over time, as global growth slows and then recovers, and so will these shares.