FT : France calls for biggest shake-up of EU merger rules in 30 years

France calls for biggest shake-up of EU merger rules in 30 years
Le Maire proposes changes that would give national leaders right to overturn decisions

Paris has called for the biggest shake-up of EU merger rules in 30 years, as it responded to last week’s decision by Brussels to block the partnership between German and French train manufacturers Siemens and Alstom.

French economy minister Bruno Le Maire, who has expressed anger at the decision by the European Commission to veto the merger, on Tuesday called for the creation of “European industrial champions”.

While Brussels warned that the combined company Siemens and Alstom would have been overly dominant in signalling and high-speed trains on the European market, Paris has slammed the rules as a relic of the 20th century that risks handing technological supremacy to China.

Speaking alongside German finance minister Olaf Scholz in Brussels on Tuesday, Mr Le Maire put forward a three-point plan of rule changes, saying he would discuss it further with Berlin in the coming days. 

The proposals include giving EU national leaders the right to overturn the commission’s merger decisions, and equipping Brussels with the ability to approve a merger but subsequently to force the combined company to make divestments if competitive problems emerged.

“Instead of blocking the creation of an industrial champion up front, we would make a dynamic, rather than a static analysis,” Mr Le Maire said. “If there is a problem, the decision can evolve.”

Another proposal is for Brussels to be “more systematic” in evaluating competition risks based on companies’ market share at global level. Under the current rules, Brussels decides case-by-case on the “market definition”— from national to worldwide — that should be used to assess the threats posed by mergers. 

However, competition lawyers say the ramifications of the proposed rule changes should not be underestimated. 

Nicholas Levy, a competition partner at Cleary Gottlieb, said the proposals would “fundamentally change the architecture of European merger control, replacing expert analysis conducted within a well-defined legal framework with political decision-making”.

“The Commission’s role would be relegated and the transparency and consistency that has characterised EU merger control for 30 years would be upended,” he said. “It is difficult to see how this would lead to better decision-making and more competitive markets.”

EU officials said Paris’s attempt to remould the competition rules was a sign of how swiftly the European political climate has changed following mounting concern about the activities of Chinese state-backed companies, not least their acquisition of European high-technology firms. The issue rocketed up the German political agenda in 2016 after the €4.5bn takeover of robotmaker Kuka by Chinese appliance maker Midea.

The merger control question has become one of Paris’s priorities in a broader Franco-German push for a new European industrial strategy, as both countries look for ways to protect their engineering expertise and foster innovation. Mr Le Maire will travel to Berlin next week for further talks on the plans.

Mr Scholz did not explicitly endorse Mr Le Maire’s three point plan on merger control, saying that Berlin wanted it to be easier “to do the necessary steps if you want to build world champions”, including via mergers.

Mr Le Maire’s proposal for EU leaders to override merger decisions mirrors an existing veto they wield over the commission when it comes to state aid. That power has never been used. 

Senior French officials said that the idea was inspired by existing procedures in France, which Mr Le Maire used last year to ease the conditions attached to an agri-food merger. 

“It is time for Europe to wake up, and to understand that technological evolution is happening very quickly”, Mr Le Maire said. “It is a question of economic survival.”

A spokesperson for the European Commission said on Tuesday: “We always stand ready to discuss with member states the proposals they may have regarding this”.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to disappointing earnings/guidance
:

  • VRNS -25%, BRS -16.7% (also terminates acquisition, announces CEO retirement), LABL -16.4% (also Board is exploring strategic alternatives), VECO -13.6%, ELVT -8.2%, CMP -6.9%, TAP -6.4% (Audit Committee concludes that the previously issued consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 should be restated and no longer be relied) LTHM -5.1%, AMKR -4.5%, SHOP -4.2%, OHI -4%, MGI -3.1%, FARM -2.1%, ACB -1.7%, SCCO -1.3%, HUN -1%

Other news:

  • NKTR -5.7% (indicated lower after abstract on NKTR-214 + nivolumab in first-line advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma was released; will host call on Feb 15)
  • MITT -3.4% (prices offering of 7 mln common shares for estimated gross proceeds of $145 mln)
  • PMT -2.9% (PennyMac Mortgage announces underwritten public offering of 7.0 mln common shares)
  • GILD -2.7% (Gilead Sciences announces that top-line data from Phase 3 STELLAR-4 study did not meet the primary endpoint)
  • NMFC -2.7% (prices 3.75 mln common stock offering at $13.57/share)
  • USAT -2.7% (files to delay its 10-Q due to previously disclosed restatement plans)
  • ABEO -1.5% (appoints João Siffert, M.D. as CEO, effective immediately)

Analyst comments:

  • TTWO -2.6% (downgraded to Underperform from Market Perform at BMO Capital Markets)
  • SOGO -1.5% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman)
  • CSCO -1.1% (downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley)
  • FAST -0.8% (downgraded to Sector Weight from Overweight at KeyBanc Capital Markets)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
:

  • PYX +15.2%, MIME +11.9%, CHGG +10%, RAMP +7.8%, ONDK +5.7%, SBLK +3.9%, BRKR +3.1%, UAA +2.9%, RNG +2.8%, BHF +2.8%, JLL +2.6%, ROAD +2.1%, MOH +1.4%, ARCC +0.9%

M&A news:

  • COTY +18.3% (JAB commences tender offer to acquire up to 150 million additional shares of COTY at $11.65/share in cash)

Other news:

  • VKTX +7.4% (attributed to GILD news that competing compound did not meet primary endpoint)
  • EA +7.3% (following Apex Legends update -- has more than 25 million players)
  • MDGL +6% (attributed to GILD news that competing compound did not meet primary endpoint)
  • ICPT +3.1% (attributed to GILD news that competing compound did not meet primary endpoint)
  • JBLU +1.3% (reports preliminary traffic results for January 2019)
  • AMZN +1% (Amazon to acquire eero; terms not disclosed)

Analyst comments:

  • PBR +3.8% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at UBS)
  • RIO +1% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

Gapping up:

  • PYX +16.4%, VKTX +11%, CHGG +9.4%, RAMP +7.8%, MIME +7.4%, EA +5.6%, MDGL +5%, SBLK +3.9%, BRKR +3.1%, RNG +2.8%, BHF +2.8%, ROAD +2.1%, ICPT +1.8%, ARCC +1.6%, ZTO +1.2%, AMZN +1%

Gapping down:

  • VRNS -24.7%, BRS -19.3%, LABL -16.4%, VECO -13.6%, ELVT -8.2%, CMP -6.9%, NKTR -5.7%, AMKR -5.7%, LTHM -4.7%, ACB -4%, GILD -3.9%, MITT -3.9%, OHI -3.6%, NMFC -3.5%, PMT -3.3%, MGI -3.1%, USAT -2.7%, FARM -2.1%, ABEO -1.5%, MOH -1.4%, SCCO -1.3%, UA -0.8%

WSJ : France Pushed Nissan for a Merger but Was Rebuffed

France Pushed Nissan for a Merger but Was Rebuffed
The Japanese car maker wanted a bigger stake in Renault

PARIS—The French government engaged directly in discussions with Nissan Motor Co. early in 2018 about the possibility of a full-blown merger with Renault SA, according to a person familiar with the deliberations.

The government’s proposal, and Nissan’s stiff opposition to the idea, demonstrate the stark differences between the French and Japanese sides over the future of a nearly 20-year-old car-making alliance between Nissan and Renault in the months before the surprise arrest of Carlos Ghosn. Mr. Ghosn forged that alliance and served as chairman of both before his detention by Japanese police in November.

Nissan and Renault executives, along with the French government, which is a major Renault shareholder, had been openly discussing for months how to reform the alliance’s structure. The debate had flared before Nissan executives started to investigate Mr. Ghosn—a probe that would ultimately lead to his arrest. Those discussions had heightened tensions between the two sides, which then spilled out into the open when Mr. Ghosn was arrested.

Nissan made clear its opposition to the merger idea at an April meeting attended by Hari Nada, a senior Nissan executive, according to the person familiar with the deliberations. The Wall Street Journal reported in December that Mr. Nada played a pivotal role in the investigation that landed Mr. Ghosn in prison.

Renault lawyers, in a letter also first reported by the Journal, have recently questioned whether Mr. Nada faced a conflict of interest in remaining the point of contact between Renault and Nissan’s senior management, while also being involved in the origins of the probe into Mr. Ghosn.

Nissan declined to comment and declined to make Mr. Nada available for comment.

The discussions about a merger included an April 23 meeting between Mr. Nada, a Nissan senior vice president in charge of the company’s chief executive office and legal department; Martin Vial, who heads the French state’s holding company; and Mouna Sepehri, a senior executive and board member at Renault, according to the person familiar with the deliberations.

Mr. Vial didn’t respond to a request for comment. The Agence des Participations de l’État, the state holding company, declined to comment. Ms. Sepehri didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The meeting came days after the holding company sent a memo to Nissan laying out the benefits of a merger between Renault and Nissan for the companies’ shareholders, according to this person.

At the meeting, Mr. Nada said the Japanese car maker felt the plan laid out in the memo didn’t sufficiently factor in the views of Nissan shareholders, and that Nissan’s preference was instead for a “rebalancing” of the partnership, the person said.

A spokesman for Renault declined to comment.

The Journal has previously reported that Mr. Nada was part of a small circle of Nissan executives who initially started looking closely at Mr. Ghosn’s deferred compensation and use of company funds. That eventually morphed into an internal probe at Nissan. It was then shared informally with Japanese prosecutors, who decided they had a criminal case.

Mr. Ghosn has been detained since Nov. 19. Tokyo prosecutors have charged him with underreporting his compensation in eight years of Nissan financial statements and with causing Nissan to pay the company of a Saudi Arabian friend who helped him with a personal financial problem.

Mr. Ghosn has said he is innocent of the charges. He says he kept a record at Nissan of how much he thought he was worth, but describes it as a hypothetical calculation that didn’t bind Nissan to pay him anything beyond his publicly reported compensation. He says Nissan received valuable services from the Saudi company and paid it appropriately.

In a recent interview with Japanese newspaper Nikkei, he blamed his arrest and the charges against him on “a plot and treason”.

At the April meeting where a merger was discussed, Mr. Nada said that the type of rebalancing of the alliance that Nissan was interested in discussing would involve Renault reducing its stake in Nissan, and Nissan increasing its stake in Renault, so that both companies had voting rights in the other, according to the person familiar with the deliberations.

Currently, Renault owns about 43% of Nissan, while Nissan owns 15% of Renault through shares that lack voting rights. That is a legacy of Renault’s investment in Nissan while it was teetering financially. Today, Renault is the smaller company in terms of sales.

Mr. Nada told his French counterparts that Nissan would also want the rebalancing to include altering the contracts between the two companies so that neither side could attempt to establish control of the other, the person said. Mr. Nada said Nissan also wanted the French state to sell its more than 15% stake in Renault as part of the rebalancing, the person said.

Lastly, Mr. Nada said Nissan was prepared to discuss building a new structure to ensure an effective succession to the leadership team of the alliance and maintain the partnership’s advantages for the car makers, the person said.

Mr. Vial, who is one of the French state’s representatives on the Renault board, said that Mr. Nada’s demands wouldn’t be acceptable to Renault because they would involve the French car maker selling down its stake in Nissan without making sufficient progress toward a merger, according to the person familiar with the deliberations.

—Sean McLain contributed to this article.

WSJ : How Bad Is the China Slowdown? U.S. Companies Offer Some Answers

How Bad Is the China Slowdown? U.S. Companies Offer Some Answers
Fourth-quarter results from U.S. companies indicate that slowing growth in China is modest, but broad

To gauge the scope of China’s economic slowdown, begin with forklifts.

The factory workhorses are a barometer of the manufacturing sector’s fitness. Changes in demand can ease or worsen concerns about China.

By that measure, EnerSys sees trouble.

The Reading, Pa., maker of batteries that power forklifts said those sales in China fell in the latest quarter after rising 10% or more earlier in the year.

“We’ve seen a slowdown,” said Michael Schmidtlein, EnerSys’ finance chief. “Given that forklifts are a good indicator of economic activity, their general economy has slowed, and maybe far greater than the authorities are indicating.”

Fourth-quarter results from U.S. companies highlight the many and varied ways that China’s cooling economy affects American business, and, in turn, offer a glimpse of what’s happening inside China. The indications are that slowing growth there is broad, if still modest.

For U.S. businesses, the repercussions extend well beyond slowing sales at companies with the biggest exposure to China’s vast economy.

Companies like EnerSys are struggling with weaker demand from export manufacturers in China, which are pulling back amid fears that trade tensions will worsen. Retailers and other companies catering to Chinese consumers face signs of weakness among the country’s growing middle class. They are buying fewer cars, phones and are traveling less.

Some analysts expect that China’s slowing growth, and its effects on U.S. companies, will worsen in the first quarter. A recent business-sentiment survey from Oxford Economics found that many North American and European businesses see elevated risks of a sharp global downturn, with many citing China’s economy and its policy response as significant risks.

“The expectation is that Q1 is going to be brutal,” said Brad Setser, former deputy assistant Treasury secretary for international economic analysis in the Obama administration, and now a senior fellow in international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Chinese exports slowed in December and are likely to decelerate more sharply in the first quarter, Mr. Setser said, especially if trade tensions with the U.S. aren’t resolved: “The question is, will the trade truce plus China’s internal stimulus put China’s economy back on a stable path?”

U.S. and Chinese officials will meet this week for trade negotiations ahead of a March 1 deadline. President Trump in early December delayed plans to increase tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods to 25% from 10%, giving the two sides time to strike a comprehensive trade deal.

The uncertainty over the path of China’s economy has gripped the attention of U.S. executives and Wall Street analysts. They mentioned China 225 times during investor conferences and calls for current S&P 500 companies through the first full week of February—the most over the same period in at least a decade, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of transcripts from FactSet.
General Motors Co. reported a 25% decline in the number of vehicles it sold in China in the fourth quarter compared with a year earlier—a grim turn in a year with a 9.8% sales drop. GM’s sales shrank faster than those of the industry as a whole, which declined 20% in the fourth quarter and about 6% for the year.

GM attributed its weaker performance largely to its lower-margin Wuling and Baojun brands in smaller Chinese cities, where a softening real-estate market has soured consumer sentiment. The company’s luxury Cadillac brand, however, rose 17% last year over 2017, driven by sales in China’s largest and most affluent cities.

One bright spot comes from continued spending by wealthy buyers. Estée Lauder Co s. said sales in the Asia-Pacific market, led by China and Hong Kong, rose 20% in the second half of last year. Chief executive Fabrizio Freda said in an earnings call last week that high-end beauty products are a relatively affordable luxury that younger Chinese shoppers keep buying, despite a decelerating national economy.

Jeweler  Tiffany & Co. , which rings up as much as 30% of its sales from Chinese consumers, said sales in China rose by more than 10% in the two-month holiday period ended Dec. 31.
Outside China, the prospects look less cheery. Analysts say most of Tiffany’s sales to Chinese consumers are from Chinese tourists shopping in Hong Kong, Europe and elsewhere. That business hasn’t held up as well. Chinese tourists bought less in the Americas and in Hong Kong in the quarter that ended in late October, the company said.

Tourism sales also slipped over the holiday period, Tiffany said in a mid-January report. The company traces softened tourist sales to a stronger dollar, which raises travel and overseas shopping costs for Chinese consumers.

Gene Ma, head of China research for the Institute of International Finance in Washington, D.C., said government rules to stem capital outflows, including tighter ATM withdrawal limits, likely depressed sales to Chinese tourists abroad, among other factors.

China’s girth
Despite slowing, China still posted economic growth above 6% last year, easily surpassing the U.S. and Europe.

The country’s 1.4 billion people and rising middle class bought nearly $52 billion worth of iPhones and other Apple Inc. products in the fiscal year that ended on Sept. 29. Rapidly expanding megacities such as Shanghai are dotted with Starbucks coffee shops, and new buildings ferry passengers on Otis elevators made by United Technologies Corp.

China’s size and rapid growth in recent years, together with the expansion of American businesses within its economy, mean even a modest slowdown can be felt along supply chains that stretch world-wide.

As more companies flagged economic weakness in China in their fourth-quarter results, investors and analysts have worked to untangle the impact on U.S. companies and economic sectors. Many companies disclose sales in Asia, and to a lesser extent in China, but exposure to the Chinese economy is much broader.

Companies such as Mastercard Inc., for instance, have no direct business within China’s domestic economy. Yet it can see the effect of slowing growth, Mastercard CEO Ajay Banga told analysts in a Jan. 31 conference call. “Given the size of the Chinese economy, it does impact the global economic picture.”

About a third of companies in the S&P 500 generate no direct revenue from China, according to estimates by FactSet, based in part on company disclosures. Another third generate at least 3% of sales in China. About 60 of the biggest U.S. companies generate 10% or more of sales there.

Many are technology and industrial companies that sell components to manufacturers that make products in China for export elsewhere, limiting their exposure to a slowing Chinese economy.

“Everything is built in China but it doesn’t necessarily stay in China,” said Christopher Rolland, a semiconductor analyst at Susquehanna International Group. Sales numbers, he added, can be “an overrepresentation of true Chinese demand.”

Not all business problems in China are driven by tariffs or slower growth there. Tupperware Brands Corp. , which markets its plastic food containers through a network of individual sellers, last month said revenue and profit across several of its units were below internal projections. The company, in part, blamed weakness in China. The company’s shares fell 27% that day.

Doug Lane, who runs a boutique investment research firm, said other direct sellers haven’t mentioned similar problems in China. “When companies are reporting numbers below expectations, they tend to blame a lot of things,” he said.

Tupperware said it generated more than $200 million in revenue in China in 2018, or about 10% of its sales, through 6,700 independent retail locations. It declined to comment.

Under pressure
EnerSys, the Pennsylvania-based battery maker, is feeling pressure from all sides: a slowing Chinese economy, new government rules and the China-U.S. trade battle.

The company generates about 5% of its total sales in China and about 60% come from the Americas. But it makes some of its batteries in China, and the company competes with Chinese battery makers that sell backup power supplies.

EnerSys said sales in Asia in its most recent quarter fell 11% from the prior quarter. A government mandate prompted one of its largest Chinese customers to use more recycled batteries.

In response to slowing sales, EnerSys had planned to use a Chinese factory to produce more products for export to the U.S. That idea was scrapped when the U.S. imposed tariffs on batteries imported from China. EnerSys says now it will export from its Chinese factory to other countries.

The cooling Chinese economy has driven down the price of raw materials, including the lead used to make batteries, but it isn’t much of a silver lining.

“Our inputs are cheaper but the broad demand for our product is less,” said Mr. Schmidtlein, the EnerSys finance chief.

Other companies are benefiting from lower-priced raw materials on the one hand, and getting pinched by U.S. tariffs on the other.

Masco Corp. , which makes Delta faucets and Hansgrohe shower heads, said it was poised to benefit from lower copper and zinc prices in the second half of last year. Masco also faces increased costs of about $150 million if the U.S. follows through on its threat to raise some tariffs on Chinese imports to 25% this year, the company said in its annual report filed Thursday.

If forklift demand is one rough gauge of economic growth, microchips are another. Consumer appetite for high-price electronics, including smartphones, has slowed. So has construction, which means fewer appliance sales. Both are bad news for semiconductor makers, whose chips span all those products.

“Industrial and consumer end markets have been especially weak in greater China,” Keith Jackson, chief executive of ON Semiconductor Corp., said.

Chinese manufacturers are cutting back orders of microchips to avoid being left with unsold goods, in case the U.S.-China trade dispute yields higher tariffs, and demand for Chinese-made goods falters.

“They’re risk averse. They’re not going to take any chances. They’re not going to hold inventory,” Thad Trent, the financial chief at Cypress Semiconductor Corp., said Jan. 16 at a conference. “We see customers waiting at the last minute to place orders.”

Chip makers link China’s slowing growth with the U.S.-China trade fight. “Trade is the problem why Chinese economy is weakening so much,” said Steve Sanghi, CEO of Microchip Technology Inc., which makes microcontrollers used in electronic and industrial components.

Some executives and analysts have said economic softness would dissipate if the trade issues were resolved. Others aren’t so sure.

“There are some underlying economic and end-demand issues in China that still need to be dealt with and resolved,” said John Vinh, a semiconductors analyst with KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. “There is not potentially a quick fix as easy as resolving the tariff conflict.”

FT : Saudi Arabia goes on the hunt for global oil and gas

Saudi Arabia goes on the hunt for global oil and gas
‘The world is going to be Saudi Aramco’s playground,’ says energy minister Khalid al Falih

Saudi Arabia plans to develop an international energy exploration and production business for the first time, doubling down on oil and gas even as the kingdom seeks to curb its reliance on hydrocarbons. 

Khalid al Falih, Saudi Arabia’s energy minister and chairman of state oil company Saudi Aramco, told the Financial Times that overseas expansion would be a critical part of the company’s future. 

“We are no longer going to be inward-looking and focused only on monetising the kingdom’s resources,” Mr Falih said. “Going forward the world is going to be Saudi Aramco’s playground.”

While Saudi Aramco is the world’s largest oil producing company, it has never meaningfully ventured overseas to extract resources, relying on its vast domestic reserves. When asked if Saudi Arabia plans to become an international energy player like Royal Dutch Shell or Exxon Mobil, pumping oil as well as gas overseas, Mr Falih said: “Correct”. 

Despite ambitious reforms driven by Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince, to wean the kingdom off what he has called its “dangerous addiction to oil”, Mr Falih mapped out Saudi Arabia’s plans to invest more in the sector that has underpinned its traditional economy.

The move underscores how Saudi Arabia is likely to remain dependent on its oil and gas prowess for raising revenues, as it struggles to diversify into new sectors such as technology, tourism, healthcare and mining.

Mr Falih said oil and gas, which has dominated its economy for decades, would ultimately still make up at least 40-50 per cent of the kingdom’s revenues even if ambitious reforms took hold. 

While the kingdom has invested abroad in refineries and petrochemicals, Mr Falih’s remarks are the clearest sign yet of its ambitions to develop oil and gas extraction projects overseas, in a move that could see it compete with international rivals. 

The minister indicated that efforts would initially be focused on creating a “global gas” business. Many of the world’s energy majors are increasingly investing in gas, as the growth of demand outpaces that for oil. 

Saudi Arabia has eyed investments in Russia’s liquefied natural gas sector and is in talks about taking a stake in export facilities in the US. But Mr Falih also mentioned Australia as a possible investment destination.

He compared Saudi Aramco’s exploration and production capabilities favourably with its global peers, saying: “We can stand shoulder to shoulder with anyone and outdo them.”

Saudi Aramco caught the attention of the international financial community when Prince Mohammed revealed plans to sell shares in the state energy company through a stock market listing. 

People familiar with the plans for the flotation have said it has been indefinitely postponed. But Mr Falih was adamant that its expansion plans reflected a need to please potential outside shareholders. 

“If I have investors from New York or London or Tokyo that are investing in Saudi Aramco they want Saudi Aramco to be competing with the world’s best international oil companies,” he said.

Hurdles for what would have been the world’s largest initial public offering included an inability to achieve the $2tn valuation Prince Mohammed had sought, regulatory concerns and worries about legal exposure.

The kingdom’s powerful sovereign wealth fund was due to be the main recipient of the $100bn that Riyadh expected to raise from the flotation. In its absence, Saudi Aramco has been instructed to acquire the fund’s 70 per cent stake in Saudi petrochemicals maker Sabic. Saudi Aramco will issue a bond to partly pay for the $70bn Sabic deal, with an investor roadshow due to start imminently, Mr Falih said.

The move enables the PIF to raise cash quickly at a time when finance ministry handouts have shrunk. The Saudi economy has reeled from the aftermath of the 2014 oil price crash, which ushered in years of austerity measures. 

As the kingdom struggled with a slowdown, the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi last year sparked its biggest diplomatic crisis with the west since the September 11 2001 attacks in the US.

“Obviously there is something of a cloud that was created by this tragic and unfortunate incident,” said Mr Falih. “[But] nobody is shying away . . . I would dispel that notion that people are avoiding investing in Saudi Arabia.”

His comments come despite signs officials are concerned about the ability of Saudi Arabia to attract foreign capital and expertise to drive forward reforms.

The kingdom faces shorter term challenges, including its relationship with the US, its oldest and most important ally. President Donald Trump has backed Saudi Arabia through the Khashoggi affair, but has long harboured animosity towards the Saudi-led Opec oil producers group. 

Legislation that would make it possible for the US government to prosecute Opec member countries for manipulating oil prices is moving forward in Congress and is thought to have one of the best chances yet of becoming law. 

Mr Falih said he trusted the US to “do the right thing” and warned that the legislation could be “harmful” for the global economy. The world would suffer “irreparably” from the loss of Saudi Arabia’s ability to quickly raise or cut oil production to balance the market. 

The kingdom and Russia are leading global producers to curb supply to support oil prices after they fell by 40 per cent in late 2018. Crude is now hovering near $60 a barrel, while Saudi Arabia’s budget requires levels closer to $80. 

Mr Falih said that in March the kingdom would reduce production to near 9.8m barrels a day, from above 11m b/d in November. Exports would also fall to near 6.9m b/d, down from 8.2m b/d three months ago.