FT : KKR set to take stake in Reliance’s Jio

KKR set to take stake in Reliance’s Jio
US private equity group would be the latest backer of Mukesh Ambani’s tech ambition

US private equity company KKR is set to become the latest high-profile foreign investor to help bankroll Indian billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s ambition to turn Jio Platforms into a domestic tech giant, people with familiar with the matter said.

KKR is in advanced talks to buy a $1.5bn stake at a valuation as high as $65bn for the fast-growing Indian digital company, one of the people said. Jio is part of Mr Ambani’s sprawling oil products-to-telecoms conglomerate Reliance Industries.

Separately, Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund, Mubadala, is considering buying a stake of up to $1.2bn in Jio, this person said.

Another person, who has been briefed on Mubadala’s strategy, said: “We are looking at it, but [it’s] a few weeks off.” He added that Jio could “fit well” into the sovereign wealth fund’s technology portfolio.

Over the past month, Reliance has attracted almost $9bn of investment from a string of top US investors. Mr Ambani, India’s richest man, is pursuing the sale of roughly 20 per cent of Jio.

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund is also in discussions to invest about $1.5bn in the company, the Financial Times reported previously.

The coronavirus pandemic and a collapse in demand for oil and refined products have added to the pressure on Mr Ambani to raise cash to shrink Reliance's $20bn net debt pile that it took on to build Jio.

Mr Ambani is also paving the way for an initial public offering of Jio, which is expected in the next five years.

Private equity group General Atlantic on Sunday became Jio’s fourth major foreign investor in as many weeks, agreeing a deal for an $870m stake. US private equity firms Vista Equity Partners and Silver Lake had already announced their own investments in Jio, at $1.5bn and $750m respectively, following an April deal by Facebook for a huge $5.7bn stake.

Reliance used cash from its core oil products business to launch Jio in 2016, enticing 388m subscribers with cheap 4G data plans. It has since diversified beyond telecoms into ecommerce and broadband services, offering global investors a route into the fast-growing Indian market. 

Mubadala, one of the emirate’s most active sovereign wealth funds, has a wide-ranging portfolio that includes stakes in a telecoms company, data centres and a satellite telecommunications group.

In recent years, Mubadala Capital’s Ventures arm, based in Abu Dhabi and San Francisco, has sought to extend investments in technology, via a fund of funds and Mubadala’s $15bn commitment to SoftBank’s Vision fund.

Mubadala, like other cash-rich wealth funds, has been scouring the globe for bargains across a corporate landscape ravaged by the economic toll of Covid-19. The fund has in recent years been monetising investments, building a cash pile that can be deployed for opportunities.

The Economic Times earlier reported on KKR and Mubadala’s interest.

Jio did not respond to a request for comment. Mubadala and KKR declined to comment. 

FT : Mars sues Pret and Panera-owner JAB over ‘stolen’ trade secrets

Mars sues Pret and Panera-owner JAB over ‘stolen’ trade secrets
US lawsuit alleges former Mars executive shared planning documents and financial results

Mars has sued rival JAB Holdings over claims a former executive stole thousands of secret company documents and passed them to the owner of Pret A Manger and Panera Bread, sparking a rare public battle between the privately held food multinationals.

The US confectionery maker alleges former Mars executive Jacek Szarzynski violated trade secrets by downloading more than 6,000 internal documents and then shared them with new colleagues at JAB and its Pret Panera unit.

The files included detailed financial results, strategic planning documents and potential acquisition targets, claimed Mars, according to the lawsuit filed in a court in Washington DC on Wednesday.

“Szarzynski’s downloading was massive and included a broad range of confidential and proprietary Mars documents about multiple global business sectors,” said the confectionery group, which makes snacks such as M&M’s sweets and Twix bars along with Pedigree and Sheba dog foods. 

“The forensic evidence shows that Szarzynski carefully targeted the Mars documents he unlawfully download[ed].”

JAB denies the claims. It said in a statement: “The lawsuit is completely without legal merit. JAB has already extensively investigated the allegations through its outside counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton, and concluded that neither JAB nor Pret Panera has used or benefited in any way from any Mars information.” Mr Szarzynski, via JAB, declined to comment.

“We tried to resolve this amicably, but unfortunately we were unable to do so,” said Stefanie Straub, general counsel at Mars.

Mr Szarzynski, a Mars employee for more than two decades, rose to the role of global chief financial officer of Mars Petcare before leaving for JAB, where he was named a partner in February 2019. He also serves as chief operating officer and chief financial officer at Pret Panera.

Mars is asking the court to ban JAB from using the documents and force the Luxembourg-based group to delete them from its systems, in addition to damages. It also accuses Mr Szarzynski of expenses fraud, claiming he charged Mars for expenses relating to JAB.

It said at least 6,166 documents, including files relating to petcare, food and the overall Mars business, were taken in late 2018 as Mr Szarzynski held talks with executives at his future employer. According to Mars, JAB later admitted receiving the documents but said Mr Szarzynski had taken them as they included his personal information.

Mr Szarzynski is one of several former senior executives from Mars now working at JAB, which was set up to handle the wealth of Germany’s billionaire Reimann family. 

Olivier Goudet, managing partner, joined in 2012 from Mars where he was chief financial officer and was heavily involved in some of the US food group’s biggest deals, including its $23bn acquisition of Wrigley, the chewing-gum maker. 

At JAB, Mr Goudet has embarked on a $50bn dealmaking spree that has transformed the group’s holdings through a series of acquisitions in coffee and soft drinks as well as with the purchase of several food-to-go chains.

In January 2019, JAB announced a leadership overhaul after the departure of chairman Bart Becht who quit after falling out with Mr Goudet and Peter Harf, who created JAB and is the longtime confidante of the Reimann family, over strategy. 

As part of the shake-up, JAB announced the appointment of new partners including Mr Szarzynski and Fabien Simon, another former Mars executive.

In February 2019, JAB made its first acquisition in petcare with a deal for Compassion-First Pet Hospitals, which operates 41 veterinary hospitals and emergency clinics in the US, putting it into a consumer category where Mars has a sizeable presence. 

Three months later, JAB agreed to buy a majority stake in National Veterinary Associates, which owned about 670 veterinary hospitals and 70 “pet resorts” across the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. 

Challenges : La France va-t-elle louer des drones de surveillance Reaper ?

La France va-t-elle louer des drones de surveillance Reaper ?

Face aux incertitudes sur le lancement de l'Eurodrone d'Airbus, Dassault et Leonardo, l'américain General Atomics propose une offre de location de ses drones Reaper et SkyGuardian. De quoi faire réfléchir le ministère des armées

En embuscade. Face à la possible explosion en vol du programme de drone européen Eurodrone, jugé trop cher par les Etats clients (Allemagne, France, Espagne, Italie), le groupe américain General Atomics s'active en coulisses. Le fabricant du drone Reaper, dont sept exemplaires sont déjà en service au sein de l'armée de l'air, avait déjà proposé à la France, fin 2019, une offre basée sur son SkyGuardian, une version améliorée du Reaper avec de nouvelles ailes en composites et une autonomie pouvant atteindre 48 heures. L'idée était d'offrir une alternative à l'Eurodrone, jugé trop cher par la ministre des armées Florence Parly, et pas assez performant par l'armée de l'air. General Atomics proposait deux options : un achat sur étagère du SkyGuardian dans sa version de base ; ou une version européanisée, dite EuroGuardian, qui permettrait d'installer des radars, systèmes de missions et armements européens sur une plateforme livrée "nue".

Surprise, le groupe de San Diego ajoute désormais une troisième option à sa proposition au ministère des armées : la location de drones Reaper ou SkyGuardian, sur le modèle du leasing de flottes automobiles. L'idée est simple : plutôt que s'engager dans une procédure d'acquisition longue et coûteuse, la France pourrait ainsi avoir accès à une flotte de drones dont la maintenance, la formation des pilotes, voire une partie des missions, serait pris en charge par l'industriel américain. "La location permet de combler à moindre frais les lacunes capacitaires pour les besoins de surveillance, indique-t-on au sein du groupe. L'US Air Force le fait déjà beaucoup : le prestataire prend en charge la partie "dull" (ennuyeuse) des missions. Le client reste en charge de la partie véritablement opérationnelle." L'externalisation ne concernerait que les missions de surveillance. L'armée de l'air resterait seule en charge des frappes menées par ses drones, effectives au Sahel depuis décembre dernier.

25 millions de dollars par an
Le leasing présente plusieurs avantages. La flexibilité, d'abord : la location permet d'avoir accès à des drones prêts à l'emploi et à des équipages disponibles. Un argument de poids quand on sait que la formation de pilotes en nombre suffisant est un véritable casse-tête pour les forces, en France comme aux Etats-Unis, en raison du manque d'instructeurs, de simulateurs, voire de candidats. Le prix, ensuite. A l'achat, un système Reaper (trois drones et deux postes de pilotage) coûte environ

>>> USGapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to disappointing earnings/guidance
:

  • ZTO -7.5%, HUYA -7%, YY -6.5%, BOOT -5.3%, TTWO -4%, BBY -3.1%, CPRT -1.9%, NDSN -0.8%, HRL -0.7%

Other news:

  • SCPH -16.9% (prices offering of 5,780,347 shares of its common stock at $8.65 per share)
  • RUTH -10.1% (announces that Jefferies will purchase $43.5 mln of stock)
  • GLPG -5.7% (GILD and GLPG announce "positive" top-line results from Phase 2b/3 trial of filgotinib)
  • FLXN -5.7% (prices underwritten public offering of 9,230,770 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $9.75 per share)
  • KDP -3.6% (40 mln share stock offering, or 2.8% of outstanding shares, by Maple Holdings)
  • FIVN -3.5% (commences $650 mln private placement of convertible senior notes due 2025)
  • BSX -3.2% (announces concurrent $750 mln common and preferred offerings)
  • CSGP -2% (upsizes and prices its offering of 2,290,076 shares of its common stock at a price of $655.00)
  • AVTR -1.5% (prices secondary offering of 45 mln shares of common stock at 16.25 per share)
  • FSLY -1.2% (prices follow-on offering of 6 mln shares of common stock at $41.50 per share)
  • NOV -0.7% (suspends quarterly dividend until further notice)

Analyst comments:

  • IGT -3.5% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at Societe Generale)
  • SQ -2.4% (downgraded to Sell from Neutral at UBS)
  • MGM -2.3% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA/Merrill; downgraded to Hold from Buy at Jefferies)
  • LOGI -1.9% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan)
  • SCHW -1.4% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA/Merrill)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
:

  • HVT +8.4%, AINV +7.2%, HWKN +5.1%, SCVL +4.9%, ORIC +4.2%, TGP +3.9%, TNK +3.9%, EXPE +3.2%, SNPS +2.1%, SKY +0.8%, BRC +0.5%, M +0.4%

Other news:

  • ACB +28.4% (to acquire Reliva, which provides strategic entry to the US mkt)
  • IMV +16% (announced positive preclinical results demonstrating robust immunogenic and antibody responses from the majority of peptide epitopes)
  • ADMA +6.5% (commenced the collection of convalescent plasma from individuals who have recovered from COVID-19)

Analyst comments:

  • SSYS +4.7% (upgraded to Neutral from Underweight at JP Morgan)
  • CAR +4% (upgraded to Equal-Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

  • Gapping up:
    • ACB +30.7%, HVT +8.4%, HWKN +5.1%, SCVL +5%, TNK +4.3%, ORIC +4.2%, EXPE +2.5%, TGP +2.2%, SNPS +1.4%
  • Gapping down:
    • SCPH -17.8%, FLXN -12.5%, ZTO -8.4%, RUTH -8%, HUYA -6.2%, GLPG -6%, YY -5.3%, TTWO -4.7%, FSLY -3.9%, BSX -3.7%, KDP -3.6%, BOOT -2.7%, CSGP -2.5%, GDX -2.1%, CPRT -1.9%, SKY -1.5%, GLD -1.1%, GILD -1%, IWM -0.8%, XLF -0.8%, NDSN -0.8%

Bus. Of Fash. : Will Luxury Resale Take Off in China? It’s Complicated.

Will Luxury Resale Take Off in China? It’s Complicated.
Before the pandemic there were hopes that young Chinese consumers were finally warming to the idea of luxury resale after cultural taboos about secondhand clothes abated. But with post-virus safety concerns now front of mind the market has hit another impasse.

SHANGHAI, China — It’s not easy getting a handle on what Chinese consumers want — or don’t want — in today’s complicated and rapidly changing landscape.

One minute the focus is on “revenge spending” and lines of shoppers outside of Chanel; the next we’re told there is a race to the bargain basement as consumers experience the biggest economic shock China has endured in generations.

The most obvious reason for these perceived contradictions is that China is a big place. There is no single prevailing wind in a market of 1.4 billion people who live in a country that is geographically, demographically and climatically more like a continent. Rather, there are a multitude of breezes, representing varied trends by consumer segment and price point.

The great diversity of consumer behaviour that exists within China also explains why there has not been a consensus on the potential of the luxury resale market. One minute the focus is on forecasts predicting sales of billions of dollars; the next we’re told it’s nothing but a niche opportunity. What gives?

Traditionally, vintage fashion has struggled in China for cultural and historical reasons since older generations tend to view pre-worn items with suspicion, as a superstitious belief that someone’s luck can be carried on in their possessions makes taking on someone else’s (potentially bad) luck a major risk.

There is also the simple fact that newness is a prized commodity in China, with pre-owned items associated with a time before the country’s economic opening up, when people were poorer and the country more broadly at a low ebb.

This is a mindset that lingers for many in the world’s largest luxury market: "Why would I pay for a secondhand Chanel bag, when I can afford to go into a store and buy a brand-new Chanel bag?" And even for those motivated by sustainability or to save money by buying comparatively affordable vintage fashion, will the notion of secondhand clothes sit right with them during a contagious pandemic?

Having waited in the wings for years for China’s secondhand market to evolve, the big resale platforms in Europe and the US must now be asking themselves these and other burning questions. The answers are more nuanced and complex than ever.

Vintage Means Individuality for China’s Youth

In 2018, when Annie Hou was vice president of strategy and innovation at Ogilvy, she undertook a research project in which she interviewed young Chinese consumers from around the country about what drives their luxury consumption.

She found, unsurprisingly, a high level of knowledge about luxury brands, with consumers in third-tier cities able to list dozens of global luxury brands off the top of their heads. Many of the post-90s shoppers Hou interviewed for the project were children of middle class households and many were second-generation luxury consumers, though their reasons for buying luxury were very different from those of their parents.

“They are only children and have grown up as China’s economy grew very fast, so they have been raised with the freedom to grow their own personality,” Hou explained. “Whatever they consume, they want to use that to build their own personal identity and image.”

This is potentially a major plus for vintage fashion — a sector which has unique product at its core. When everyone else is going out to buy the it-bag of the season, an increasing number of young consumers want what no one else has. Wearing a relatively obscure luxury item from years ago is more unique in the context of today than any item from that brand’s latest collection.

Pawnstar, a cleverly named consignment store that has been operating in Shanghai since 2016, caters to these younger consumers. The store was started by Jane Jia and her husband, Nels Frye, who found themselves at the forefront of a burgeoning movement, routinely clocking annual sales growth of 40 percent per year.

“Our main demographic is 30 something women; they might be business owners or work in corporations, but they just have style,” Frye said of Pawnstar’s customers, who shop both in store and via livestreams on platforms such as Mogujie and ShopShops.

“Online it’s mostly second-tier city customers, [from] places like Chongqing, Chengdu, definitely a lot from those places, but they can come from anywhere,” he added.

Unusually, Pawnstar’s business was built on the back of ready-to-wear consignment, modelled on the ubiquitous consignment stores in countries like Japan, where data from Berenberg Bank shows sales of pre-owned goods account for 10 percent of the luxury market, compared to just 3 percent in China.

Chinese tech publication 36Kr has estimated that 85 percent of China’s secondhand economy is driven by those under the age of 35.

One of those consumers is sociology student Bonnie Wang, 33, from Shanghai. Her love of vintage pieces from 1990s and early 2000s era Margiela and Comme des Garçons was fermented by frequent shopping trips to Japan.

“I think there is a huge opportunity [for luxury resale] as the economy slows down a little bit, making people maybe cut down their luxury spending — and at the same time. people are looking at style more than trends,” she said, suggesting that the belt-tightening efforts of some consumers could benefit China’s bourgeoning luxury resale market.

China’s Resale Landscape

The resale market’s growth has been significant, with research conducted by the China Centre for Internet Economy Research (prior to the coronavirus pandemic) predicting sales of secondhand goods in China would reach one trillion yuan ($145 billion) this year, double the amount seen in 2017.

More specific data for the luxury industry was published in the 2019 Chinese Secondhand Luxury Industry Report, showing that in 2018, sales of pre-owned luxury products amounted to 12.1 billion yuan ($1.7 billion). This places the Chinese market well behind the $5 billion and $6 billion resale luxury markets in Japan and the US respectively, but the yearly growth rate was impressive, clocking 20 percent annually for the last four years, a rate expected to continue, or even accelerate, this year (again, before the pandemic).

The future potential of the market explains why Pawnstar wasn’t the only player to enter the secondhand luxury market in recent years. Most of the secondhand sales activity in China happens online, with data from QuestMobile showing 60 percent of consumers in major cities report using secondhand sales apps. Unsurprisingly, the largest resale player in the general merchandise category is an Alibaba-backed company, Xianyu, which boasts more than 200 million users.

In the secondhand luxury sector, the major online player is Plum, also known by the Chinese name Hongbulin, which first launched in 2017 and has raised $58.4 million in six rounds of funding, including $20 million in its latest Series B round last August.

Like international luxury consignment sites, Plum operates on a consumer to consumer model, with the platform in the middle, connecting consumers who want to sell with those who want to buy and providing all the photography, authentication, pricing and logistical support to facilitate those sales. Unlike The RealReal, which offers tiered commission rates, Plum charges a 20 percent commission across the board.

These local players have emerged in something of a vacuum in China, with major international online luxury resellers almost completely absent from the market.

In 2017, following a $65 million round of funding, Vestiaire Collective announced China would be a major target for expansion, both from a customer and product acquisition standpoint. That push never really happened.

This April, when the company announced it had raised an additional €59 million ($64.6 million), from investors including Korelya Capital, a venture capital firm known for helping European tech companies expand in Asia, Vestiaire Collective said it was with an eye to expansion in Japan and South Korea this year, rather than China.

“We are seeing indicat[ions] that China will… be a big supply market for us moving forwards… [but] at the moment, we don't have plans to enter China this year,” a spokesperson for Vestiaire Collective told BoF.

The world’s largest secondhand luxury marketplace, The RealReal, confirmed to BoF that it doesn’t ship to mainland China at all and has "no expansion plans to share at this time". Some consignment companies contacted by BoF said they had been in contact with The RealReal about potentially sourcing product from China, but the idea of accessing the Chinese consumer market for sales remains an exceedingly complicated business for secondhand platforms.

Firstly, it’s almost impossible to import secondhand clothing into China. There are smaller players who bring secondhand products in via daigou agents, and other platforms that facilitate transactions, rather than holding product themselves, both of which would be unsuitable for The RealReal’s business model. To do business in China, they would almost certainly have to set up a local legal entity and then source product from within the country to sell to Chinese consumers, which would take a significant investment and may also have the drawback of not being as appealing to Chinese consumers as product sourced from elsewhere.

Not only do international players need to find the fastest and most efficient shipping and delivery routes based on where items are being sold from, as well as dealing with customs, duties, taxes, legal restrictions and currency fluctuations, they would also, at this point, need to do so after ceding the first-mover advantage to local players. However, there is also an argument that Chinese consumers would support international resale players because of the perception that their experience and qualifications make them trustworthy when it comes to authentication.

The Question of Counterfeits

Perhaps even more of a hindrance to the luxury resale market in China than the cultural stigma attached to secondhand goods is the lingering spectre of counterfeits.

“A lot of counterfeiters are really, really [adept] at taking the genuine hardware of an old bag and putting it on a fake bag, for example,” China Market Research Group Managing Director Ben Cavender said. “It’s very difficult for people to know if they are buying a real product.”

One way Pawnstar and Plum have worked to combat consumer discomfort over counterfeits is through livestreaming, which allows for detailed explanations of product and provenance, as well as the opportunity for potential consumers to ask detailed questions.

Both of these luxury resellers also source a good deal of their products from outside of China, circumventing stringent laws on bringing secondhand clothing into the country by focusing their international partnerships on other product segments, for example, bags and jewellery.

Plum has aligned itself with well-respected consignment stores in Japan, which are familiar to the well-travelled female customers who make up their audience. This not only improves their inventory, but also reassures customers that products are less likely to be counterfeit than those sourced from within China.

Frye says Pawnstar is increasingly sourcing products from the US, where there is an “almost limitless supply” of high-quality goods from the mid-20th century that are completely new to Chinese consumers. The fact that it is sourced from the US also helps consumer confidence in its authenticity.

Coronavirus: Help or Hindrance?

If top-line numbers are any indication, the coronavirus outbreak has been something of a boon for the broader resale market.

According to general merchandise resale player Xianyu, the platform’s average transactions and gross merchandise volume in March broke records. New sellers increased by 38.8 percent and newly listed products by 40 percent compared to the same period last year.

Something similar happened in the luxury fashion resale sector. In the same month, Plum saw its monthly active users increase by 40.4 percent year-on-year. Xu Wei, Plum’s chief and founder, told local media that sales in March reached an all-time high. “An increasing number of people were selling secondhand luxury products in exchange for cash,” Xu said.

“[At the same time] since almost everyone was staying at home to help curb the spread of Covid-19, the time spent on online shopping became more prolonged. Therefore, the transaction volume increased,” she added.

For Pawnstar too, online business remained brisk, even as footfall in the Shanghai store has fallen considerably. For its business model overall, however, the coronavirus outbreak has presented more risk than reward.

“Profit has been very low in the physical store. We’ve been focusing more on jewellery, that seems like the safest bet. Taking people’s consignment is fraught with potential things that would make people nervous,” Frye said.

Pawnstar has actually halted consignment of ready-to-wear for the time being. “I can only speak for my own experience, but we are really worried that people will see secondhand stores as a bit of a risk [while concern about Covid-19 runs high],” he added.

With the pandemic seen both as a driver of the trend towards secondhand consumption and as a potential spanner in the works, questions remain as to whether luxury resale will take market share from new luxury branded products. The sense of urgency is pronounced in a year in which global players will be looking at domestic Chinese spend to prop up business lost from travel retail and forced closures.

So far, the answer seems to be probably not, or at least not in any significant way. New luxury customers in China will still make their first foray via major players like Louis Vuitton; established luxury consumers will continue to diversify the number of brands in their collections; and a small number of younger luxury consumers will gravitate towards luxury resale as a way of diversifying even further, regardless of the macro-economic landscape.

According to Ben Cavender, the growth of the secondhand luxury market in China is a real phenomenon, but it’s not actually one being driven by frugality in the face of economic shocks accelerated by the coronavirus outbreak. What he believes is driving the market is actually a more experienced and sophisticated young luxury shopper in China, who is looking beyond trends as they invent and reinvent their own personal style.

“It really is being driven by this consumer sophistication and the need to be a chameleon, versus saving money,” he said.

Dior to Revive Real World Fashion Events in China

As fashion events worldwide continue to be either cancelled, postponed or held exclusively online, Dior is wading back into the real world of events with its “Christian Dior: Designer of Dreams” retrospective, which is coming to Shanghai’s Long Museum from July 28 to October 4, following previous showings at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs in Paris and the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. (Dior)

C-Beauty Unicorn Bats Away IPO Rumours

Perfect Diary has denied it has plans to IPO in the first half of 2021, refuting recent speculation in Chinese media. Following a fresh capital injection of $100 million raised in April, the C-Beauty giant boasts a $2 billion valuation, but as a consumer goods company, it’s lack of profitability amidst breakneck expansion and an expensive brick-and-mortar rollout currently underway makes an IPO unlikely in the short term. (36Kr)