FT : UK car dealers prepare to slash quarter of staff as pandemic bites

UK car dealers prepare to slash quarter of staff as pandemic bites
150,000 jobs could be lost in coming months, according to forecasts from executives

Car dealers are preparing to cut tens of thousands of jobs across the UK in the coming months as they scale back operations in the face of falling sales because of coronavirus.

Lookers, one of the largest listed groups, announced on Thursday it would shed 1,500 roles as part of a scheme to close 12 sites and slash costs.

But the industry is braced for far deeper cuts, with tens of thousands of people still on furlough schemes that the government will unwind later this year.

At most, a quarter of the 600,000 jobs supported by the sector may be lost, according to worst-case-scenario estimates from executives across a range of both privately owned and listed dealership groups.

“In the best case, it’s tens of thousands, in the worst case it’s more like 150,000,” said the chief executive of one dealer group. “Until the furlough scheme is concluded, until the [Brexit] transition agreement is done, we are all insulated from the reality of the situation.”

The showroom sector has been slowly declining for several years, as more consumers browse online and require fewer test drives.

But the sales squeeze because of the pandemic is set to accelerate consolidation across the sector, and cost cutting by big groups.

Since showrooms flung open their doors on Monday, business has been encouraging, with several groups reporting higher-than expected interest, as well as a backlog of internet orders from during the lockdown, according to internal sales data from several companies seen by the FT.

However, much of the demand is driven by people renewing past deals and the backlog of orders.

“The worry is it’s just pent up demand that will fizzle out,” said the chief executive of another dealership group.

This weekend, the first since opening, is expected to be strong according both to group executives, and to dealership heads at multiple showrooms visited by the FT over the last week. “The weekend will be monstrous,” said one dealer group CEO.

But the sustainability of the trading is under question.

In Germany, new car sales in May were 50 per cent lower than a year earlier, despite showrooms being open for the whole month. 

UK new car sales so far this year, which include April and May when dealers were closed, are down by 50 per cent, according to SMMT data, and are expected to fall by a third across the whole year.

“It will be towards September, October that we will get a better sense of the market,” said one senior industry figure.

The government’s support scheme is currently expected to wind down in October, forcing companies to decide whether to reinstate staff, or release them.

While thousands of workers have been brought back into showrooms and garages as they reopened, more than a third of the industry is thought to be furloughed.

“We would like to bring everyone back but it’s all about demand,” said one dealer group CEO. “We simply don’t know yet. The economy is going to go through tough times. We live and breath consumer confidence.”

There are some bright spots. The value of used cars, a segment four times the size of new ones, is holding up amid robust demand as people trade in cheaper vehicles, or buy second hand to avoid taking public transport.

Online-only deliveries have also risen. Despite every showroom being closed in May, some 13,000 cars were still sold to consumers in the month, according to the SMMT.

“One in three retail sales are now done online, but we are way off this in the automotive sector,” said Ian Plummer, commercial director at Auto Trader, who expects more motorists to move to online ordering. Traffic at Auto Trader’s online marketplace has already recovered to levels before the lockdown.

“For 20 years we have talked about people moving away from dealerships, but if you look at the numbers it hasn’t happened,” said Sue Robinson, director of the National Franchise Dealer Association.

She added that the number of dealer sites has only fallen from 4,792 dealers in 2009 to 4,487 last year.

“Dealers are resilient, and they will still exist in the future, despite the doomsayers.”

FT : Vatican arrests London-based broker

Vatican arrests London-based broker
Gianluigi Torzi was a middleman in the acquisition of a luxury property in Chelsea

The Vatican has arrested a London-based broker involved in a multimillion pound purchase in 2018 of a luxury property development in Chelsea, in the latest stage of a sweeping investigation into suspected financial irregularities inside the Holy See.

Gianluigi Torzi, an Italian middleman who was involved in the Vatican buying out a minority investment in a large central London building in 2018, was arrested on suspicion of extortion, embezzlement, aggravated fraud and money laundering on Friday, the Vatican said in a statement.

Officials inside the Vatican’s Secretariat of State, its central administrative arm, had made a minority investment in 60 Sloane Avenue, the London building, in 2014 through a Luxembourg-based investment fund before purchasing the building outright in November 2018, in a deal in which Mr Torzi worked as a middleman and received a commission. 

In a statement the Vatican said its prosecutors had on Friday evening issued a warrant against Mr Torzi after interviewing him. The warrant was issued: “in relation to the well-known events connected with the sale of the London property on Sloane Avenue”.

“The accused is charged with various episodes of extortion, embezzlement, aggravated fraud and self laundering, crimes for which the Vatican Law provides for sentences of up to twelve years imprisonment. At present, Mr. Gianluigi Torzi is detained in special premises at the Gendarmerie Corps Barracks.” 

Mr Torzi was not available for comment. It is very rare for Holy See authorities, which operate under the sovereign jurisdiction of the Vatican, to arrest and hold an Italian citizen who is not an employee of the Vatican. The investigation into the investment in 60 Sloane Avenue, in a complex transaction worth hundreds of millions of pounds, became public in October last year when its police raided the offices of the Secretariat of State. 

The Secretariat of State made its initial investment in the London property in 2014 using money it held in two Swiss banks, not from funds held within the Vatican’s own property manager or bank.

Last October five Holy See officials were suspended and computers and documents were seized from the offices of the Secretariat of State and the Vatican’s financial regulator.

In February Vatican police raided the residence of Alberto Perlasca, a priest and senior official, who worked inside the Secretariat of State at the time of the transactions.

Earlier this month Credit Suisse froze a Swiss-based bank account linked to the transaction on the request of the Vatican, people familiar with the situation said. Credit Suisse declined to comment.

Barrons : Merger Arbs Are Confident Despite Whispers on Tiffany Deal

Merger Arbs Are Confident Despite Whispers on Tiffany Deal

Merger arbitragers require strong nerves even in the best of times, as they bet on deals getting completed when doubts remain.

Those nerves are steadier now that the market has rebounded off its March lows. Deals announced before the Covid-19 pandemic look set to close—and on their original terms.

They include Morgan Stanley’s (ticker: MS) acquisition of E*Trade Financial (ETFC), Eldorado Resorts ’ (ERI) buy of Caesars Entertainment (CZR), and Franklin Resources ’ (BEN) purchase of Legg Mason (LM). The spreads on these transactions have all narrowed considerably since March.

“There haven’t been many attempts for buyers to walk away from deals,” says Roy Behren, co-manager of the $3 billion Merger Fund. “It’s different from what we saw during the financial crisis.”

This past week, Charles Schwab’s (SCHW) plan to buy TD Ameritrade Holding (AMTD) moved forward, as it received U.S. antitrust approval.

One question mark of late, however, has been LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton’s $16 billion offer for Tiffany (TIF).

This past week, the fashion news publication WWD reported that LVMH (LVMUY), led by billionaire Bernard Arnault, was rethinking the $135-a-share deal, in light of the impact of the pandemic on Tiffany’s results.

But on Friday, Reuters reported that Arnault isn’t seeking to renegotiate the terms—although he could still revisit the matter—and Tiffany shares rose more than 5%, to $120.

Wall Street is putting a high likelihood of the purchase closing on the original terms, in part because of the legal difficulty for buyers in backing out of merger pacts.

One arbitrager tells Barron’s that he is surprised that LVMH might try to renegotiate, given that Tiffany is so small, compared with LVMH, one of the largest companies in Europe. A price cut of, say, $20 a share for Tiffany would total less than $3 billion, a tiny amount, relative to LVMH’s market value of $217 billion.

Merger arbs typically buy shares in the target company and sell short those of the acquirer to hedge their risk. For cash deals, arbs usually just buy the target.

Arbitrage is done largely by professional investors, but there are a number of retail-oriented funds through which individuals can participate in the market.

The Merger Fund (MERFX), which has been around for more than 30 years, is down 0.2% this year and has gained an annualized 4.6% in the past three years. That makes it one of the better performers in its category of event-driven funds, according to Morningstar Direct.

The $700 million IQ Merger Arbitrage exchange-traded fund (MNA) is down about 5% this year. Its top holdings include Tiffany, E*Trade Financial, and Taubman Centers (TCO).

Behren thinks that mid-single-digit returns are possible in the arbitrage market for the rest of this year. He notes that there still are about $200 billion of pending U.S. mergers set to close.

Aside from Tiffany, the one prominent transaction with a wide spread involves Taubman Centers, the high-end mall operator that agreed to be purchased by industry leader Simon Property Group (SPG) in February for $52.50 a share. Both are real-estate investment trusts.

Taubman shares, at $44, trade at a 15% discount to the Simon’s offer of $52.50 a share amid worries about Simon’s willingness to complete the purchase. If the deal falls apart, Taubman stock could plunge below $20.

One of the challenges for arbitragers is a lack of deals. Only a handful of mergers has been announced in the U.S. since March. The largest of these was Alexion Pharmaceuticals ’ (ALXN) purchase of Portola Pharmaceuticals (PTLA) for $1.4 billion.

Behren says that investment bankers have told him that things are heating up in the merger and acquisition market.

Yet Covid-19 restrictions make it difficult for potential buyers to conduct due diligence on target companies, given the difficulty of face-to-face meetings and travel. Zoom videoconferencing calls aren’t enough for many buyers.

Says Behren: “There has been a lot of dating, but nobody is getting married yet.”

Barrons : GlaxoSmithKline’s Promising Drug Pipeline Should Drive the Stock Highe

GlaxoSmithKline’s Promising Drug Pipeline Should Drive the Stock Higher

Pharmaceuticals are one of the defensive stocks in the current crisis, for obvious reasons. However, it is too early to quantify the magnitude of a coronavirus benefit.

But GlaxoSmithKline (ticker: GSK) is worth paying attention to for unrelated developments that aren’t yet factored into its value. Its trial of Cabotegravir, a regular injection to prevent HIV infection, has been stopped three years early because of its success: Tests showed it to be 69% more effective than Truvada, a tablet produced by competitor Gilead Sciences (GILD), the current gold standard.

The market for HIV prevention, known as pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, is a $2 billion opportunity for pharma firms that is expected to rise to $5.5 billion by 2030.

Glaxo looks set to unlock some value in other ways. It is undergoing a restructuring, spinning off the consumer-health division that makes Advil and Panadol, and has a strong pipeline of potential blockbusters on the way.

The United Kingdom–based company’s stock slid along with most other stocks at the height of the pandemic, falling to 1,374 pence ($17.29) in March. It has recovered in the past month, rising 4.96%, to 1,651 pence. French bank Société Générale has marked the stock a Buy, estimating that it will rise 35.6%, to 2,240 pence.

UBS also marked it a Buy with a price target of 1,920 pence. UBS analyst Laura Sutcliffe wrote in a May note that PrEP is a multibillion opportunity for Gilead, “but we think consensus estimates include little or nothing for GSK in this market (either by expanding it or taking share from Gilead), so approval, whether based on one study or two, offers upside in our view.”

Glaxo, the U.K.’s fifth-largest firm, with a market value of 82.7 billion pounds sterling ($104.11 billion), employs about 100,000. The company fetches 14.2 times this year’s expected earnings. and is valued at a 30% discount to its peers. The stock offers the highest dividend yield of European Union large-cap pharma, according to analysts at Jefferies.

Glaxo posted a pretax profit of £6.2 billion for 2019, up from £4.8 billion the year before, on sales of £33 billion. In April, it posted a 19% rise in first-quarter sales.

CEO Emma Walmsley told Barron’s that the priority is to continue progress with the research-and-development pipeline, and support new-product launches.

“Recent data readouts—including in oncology and HIV—have been positive and underpin our decision to further increase investment in R&D as part of our new approach, which focuses on science related to the immune system, use of genetics, and new technologies,’’ she says.

Glaxo has started a two-year program to get it ready to “set up two new leading companies in biopharma and consumer health care,” she says. She added that the business is also focused on developing multiple vaccines for the Covid-19 crisis “using our unique adjuvant technology.”

The company’s vaccine business had overall sales of £7.2 billion, and the consumer-health division that’s being spun off will generate £500 million in annual savings by 2023. Analysts at broker Liberum say this is an “important year” for Glaxo, with six potential drug approvals in 2020, and several of “blockbuster potential.”

But it is Viiv Healthcare, a joint venture with Pfizer (PFE) that could unlock hidden value with Cabotegravir.

The drug has the potential to replace Truvada, which relies on users remembering to take a daily tablet to be protected from HIV.

Cabotegravir’s bimonthly injection has close to 100% adherence and, if adopted, could be a welcome boost to Glaxo’s stock. B

Barrons : A Golden Opportunity For Two Small-Cap Miners

A Golden Opportunity For Two Small-Cap Miners

Gold miners have focused in recent years on creating not just bigger companies but also better ones. Managers have prioritized increased efficiency and free cash flow, rather than merely mining more ounces. A pending merger of two small-cap miners, SSR Mining and Alacer Gold, is emblematic of the trend, and a model for the industry’s newfound focus on generating better shareholder returns.

Last month, SSR (ticker: SSRM) and Alacer (ASR.Canada), each with roughly $2 billion in market value, announced plans to combine in a no-premium merger of equals, with Rod Antal, Alacer’s chief executive of seven years, becoming CEO of the combined company, which will take SSR’s name. SSR’s current chairman, Michael Anglin, will chair the enterprise, with the board split down the middle. SSR and Alacer have complementary strengths, and the combined company’s increased scale is expected to provide a bevy of financial benefits. As a result, the market is likely to reward the new SSR with a higher valuation than either company could have achieved on its own.

“What I like so much about this is that it’s a merger of equals,” says Joe Foster, a portfolio manager and head of the gold investment team at VanEck. “We’ve seen so many companies overpay for acquisitions in the past.”

SSR’s current CEO, Paul Benson, will leave the company once the deal closes this summer. “The last thing a CEO needs is the former CEO sitting behind him whispering advice in his ear,” says Benson. “I’ll remain a shareholder, and I’ll be cheering loudly from the stands, but I will step away.”

Barrick Gold (GOLD) kicked off the trend toward zero-premium mergers in the gold-mining industry when it combined with Randgold in January 2019, and several other mergers of equals followed. Few costs can be eliminated in a merger of mining companies, making acquisition premiums hard to justify. Other than some redundant overhead, the operations of physically distant mines can’t be streamlined.

Still, at-the-market mergers of smaller gold miners can enhance the strengths of two companies whose whole is greater than the sum of their parts. Vancouver-headquartered SSR brings a pair of gold mines in Nevada and Saskatchewan and a silver mine in Argentina. Adding Alacer’s larger Çöpler gold mine in eastern Turkey will give the new company a more well-rounded portfolio, with a long-life cornerstone asset and greater geographic diversification. Postmerger, SSR will produce almost 800,000 ounces of gold annually at an all-in sustaining cost of about $900 per ounce.

Technological skill sets are also complementary. SSR and Alacer utilize different mining and processing techniques at their sites. The combined company will have the capabilities needed to pursue a wider range of potential projects. “There should be no ore body left on the planet that we should be scared about taking on,” says Benson.

And postmerger, SSR will have greater financial capability to pursue those projects. Analysts project roughly $450 million in annual free cash flow in coming years at the current gold price of about $1,676. The company can fund exploration and expansion projects internally without taking on debt. Both companies have solid balance sheets, and SSR will have almost a dollar a share in net cash after the merger.

The combined company’s balance sheet and cash flow mean that a shareholder-return program is likely to be announced once the merger is completed, in the form of a dividend, share buybacks, or both. That could increase SSR’s appeal to a broader range of investors, while a doubling in market capitalization and trading liquidity will expand the universe of funds able to invest in the shares.

The result could be a higher price/earnings ratio than the 11 times next year’s estimated earnings that SSR’s and Alacer’s shares both command currently. Gold-industry giants Barrick and Newmont (NEM) each trade for more than 21 times forward earnings.


Gold miners have focused in recent years on creating not just bigger companies but also better ones. Managers have prioritized increased efficiency and free cash flow, rather than merely mining more ounces. A pending merger of two small-cap miners, SSR Mining and Alacer Gold, is emblematic of the trend, and a model for the industry’s newfound focus on generating better shareholder returns.

Last month, SSR (ticker: SSRM) and Alacer (ASR.Canada), each with roughly $2 billion in market value, announced plans to combine in a no-premium merger of equals, with Rod Antal, Alacer’s chief executive of seven years, becoming CEO of the combined company, which will take SSR’s name. SSR’s current chairman, Michael Anglin, will chair the enterprise, with the board split down the middle. SSR and Alacer have complementary strengths, and the combined company’s increased scale is expected to provide a bevy of financial benefits. As a result, the market is likely to reward the new SSR with a higher valuation than either company could have achieved on its own.

“What I like so much about this is that it’s a merger of equals,” says Joe Foster, a portfolio manager and head of the gold investment team at VanEck. “We’ve seen so many companies overpay for acquisitions in the past.”

SSR’s current CEO, Paul Benson, will leave the company once the deal closes this summer. “The last thing a CEO needs is the former CEO sitting behind him whispering advice in his ear,” says Benson. “I’ll remain a shareholder, and I’ll be cheering loudly from the stands, but I will step away.”

Barrick Gold (GOLD) kicked off the trend toward zero-premium mergers in the gold-mining industry when it combined with Randgold in January 2019, and several other mergers of equals followed. Few costs can be eliminated in a merger of mining companies, making acquisition premiums hard to justify. Other than some redundant overhead, the operations of physically distant mines can’t be streamlined.

Still, at-the-market mergers of smaller gold miners can enhance the strengths of two companies whose whole is greater than the sum of their parts. Vancouver-headquartered SSR brings a pair of gold mines in Nevada and Saskatchewan and a silver mine in Argentina. Adding Alacer’s larger Çöpler gold mine in eastern Turkey will give the new company a more well-rounded portfolio, with a long-life cornerstone asset and greater geographic diversification. Postmerger, SSR will produce almost 800,000 ounces of gold annually at an all-in sustaining cost of about $900 per ounce.

Technological skill sets are also complementary. SSR and Alacer utilize different mining and processing techniques at their sites. The combined company will have the capabilities needed to pursue a wider range of potential projects. “There should be no ore body left on the planet that we should be scared about taking on,” says Benson.

And postmerger, SSR will have greater financial capability to pursue those projects. Analysts project roughly $450 million in annual free cash flow in coming years at the current gold price of about $1,676. The company can fund exploration and expansion projects internally without taking on debt. Both companies have solid balance sheets, and SSR will have almost a dollar a share in net cash after the merger.

The combined company’s balance sheet and cash flow mean that a shareholder-return program is likely to be announced once the merger is completed, in the form of a dividend, share buybacks, or both. That could increase SSR’s appeal to a broader range of investors, while a doubling in market capitalization and trading liquidity will expand the universe of funds able to invest in the shares.

The result could be a higher price/earnings ratio than the 11 times next year’s estimated earnings that SSR’s and Alacer’s shares both command currently. Gold-industry giants Barrick and Newmont (NEM) each trade for more than 21 times forward earnings.

Gold miners have focused in recent years on creating not just bigger companies but also better ones. Managers have prioritized increased efficiency and free cash flow, rather than merely mining more ounces. A pending merger of two small-cap miners, SSR Mining and Alacer Gold, is emblematic of the trend, and a model for the industry’s newfound focus on generating better shareholder returns.

Last month, SSR (ticker: SSRM) and Alacer (ASR.Canada), each with roughly $2 billion in market value, announced plans to combine in a no-premium merger of equals, with Rod Antal, Alacer’s chief executive of seven years, becoming CEO of the combined company, which will take SSR’s name. SSR’s current chairman, Michael Anglin, will chair the enterprise, with the board split down the middle. SSR and Alacer have complementary strengths, and the combined company’s increased scale is expected to provide a bevy of financial benefits. As a result, the market is likely to reward the new SSR with a higher valuation than either company could have achieved on its own.

“What I like so much about this is that it’s a merger of equals,” says Joe Foster, a portfolio manager and head of the gold investment team at VanEck. “We’ve seen so many companies overpay for acquisitions in the past.”

SSR’s current CEO, Paul Benson, will leave the company once the deal closes this summer. “The last thing a CEO needs is the former CEO sitting behind him whispering advice in his ear,” says Benson. “I’ll remain a shareholder, and I’ll be cheering loudly from the stands, but I will step away.”

Barrick Gold (GOLD) kicked off the trend toward zero-premium mergers in the gold-mining industry when it combined with Randgold in January 2019, and several other mergers of equals followed. Few costs can be eliminated in a merger of mining companies, making acquisition premiums hard to justify. Other than some redundant overhead, the operations of physically distant mines can’t be streamlined.

Still, at-the-market mergers of smaller gold miners can enhance the strengths of two companies whose whole is greater than the sum of their parts. Vancouver-headquartered SSR brings a pair of gold mines in Nevada and Saskatchewan and a silver mine in Argentina. Adding Alacer’s larger Çöpler gold mine in eastern Turkey will give the new company a more well-rounded portfolio, with a long-life cornerstone asset and greater geographic diversification. Postmerger, SSR will produce almost 800,000 ounces of gold annually at an all-in sustaining cost of about $900 per ounce.

Technological skill sets are also complementary. SSR and Alacer utilize different mining and processing techniques at their sites. The combined company will have the capabilities needed to pursue a wider range of potential projects. “There should be no ore body left on the planet that we should be scared about taking on,” says Benson.

And postmerger, SSR will have greater financial capability to pursue those projects. Analysts project roughly $450 million in annual free cash flow in coming years at the current gold price of about $1,676. The company can fund exploration and expansion projects internally without taking on debt. Both companies have solid balance sheets, and SSR will have almost a dollar a share in net cash after the merger.

The combined company’s balance sheet and cash flow mean that a shareholder-return program is likely to be announced once the merger is completed, in the form of a dividend, share buybacks, or both. That could increase SSR’s appeal to a broader range of investors, while a doubling in market capitalization and trading liquidity will expand the universe of funds able to invest in the shares.

The result could be a higher price/earnings ratio than the 11 times next year’s estimated earnings that SSR’s and Alacer’s shares both command currently. Gold-industry giants Barrick and Newmont (NEM) each trade for more than 21 times forward earnings.

Barrons : Celebrate Friday’s Jobs Surprise. Then Look Beyond the Headlines.


Celebrate Friday’s Jobs Surprise. Then Look Beyond the Headlines.

No one saw it coming. Instead of showing that millions more Americans had lost their jobs in May, the latest employment report showed that payrolls rose by 2.5 million as the U.S. economy began to reopen after months of business shutdowns and consumer quarantines.

The stock market rightfully celebrated what was the biggest labor-market surprise in history and, more importantly, evidence that rehiring the more than 22 million people who have become unemployed since March is under way. The S&P 500 climbed 2.7% Friday, leaving it up 5% on the week and all but erasing its year-to-date loss, and the Nasdaq Composite notched an intraday record high.

It is too soon, however, for investors to let their guards down.

The headline numbers look great, but it’s going to be a long road to recovery, says Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. It is a positive development that we’re starting out on that road earlier than economists predicted (on average they expected nonfarm payrolls to decline by eight million in May). But Daco says investors shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that we’re still 20 million jobs in the hole and facing an unemployment rate that, at 13.3%, is four times as high as a few months ago.

Surprise Gains, and a Hidden Pain
U.S. businesses added 2.5 million nonfarm jobs in May, defying expectations for over 8million job cuts. Those gains helped bring down the main unemployment rate, but abroader measure of joblessness suggests that more than 20% of the overall labor poolis unemployed.


Nor should investors forget that some of the gains were surely driven by temporary fiscal-support programs, or that the possibility of a second wave of contagion looms as states reopen. Even if you look past the still-sky-high unemployment rate that fell from April, a broader, more meaningful measure of unemployment that captures part-time workers is sitting at 21.2%. What’s more, the headline figure only slipped on the surface, masking a rise to over 16% because of what the Labor Department says is a problem with how survey respondents characterize their absence from work.

One reason Daco says investors shouldn’t be overly euphoric: He forecasts just 60% of the jobs claimed by the coronavirus pandemic will be recovered by year’s end, translating to about 13 million still out of work and an unemployment rate of about 10% heading into 2021. That we’ve already recovered 2.5 million of the lost jobs is reassuring, but it will take time to determine how many of those rehired remain on payrolls and how quickly the pace picks up.

Uncertainty surrounding the pace of future hiring and the stickiness of last month’s jobs gains stems in part from the Payroll Protection Program, part of the Cares Act meant to encourage small businesses to rehire furloughed workers. For the loans to be forgiven, companies have needed to use 75% of the funds to rehire workers by June 30. A bill signed on Friday by President Trump relaxes those restrictions, potentially helping more small businesses survive the virus shock, but it also may result in a rehiring delay. Moreover, companies that hired back workers in anticipation of the original deadline could shed some of those employees once their PPP loan is forgiven.

Reading the Rates
The main unemployment rate fell to 13.3% in May from 14.7% in April, but a broadermeasure of joblessness suggests that more than 20% of the overall labor pool isunemployed
To that point, the Labor Department said in its May report that workers who were paid by their employer for all or any part of the pay period including the 12th of the month were counted as employed, even if they weren’t actually at their jobs. As anecdotal reporting by Barron’s has shown, some employers have paid workers with PPP funds even as they remained closed or faced little to no customer demand. All of that shows the program has been working, but it raises questions about the sustainability of the jobs it has helped fund—especially if sweetened unemployment benefits expire as planned in July and millions remain unemployed at a time when the U.S. economy is as dependent as ever on the ability and willingness of consumers to spend.

In a sign of the pain across the small-business sector, which accounts for about half of overall employment, 10% of small firms have already missed a loan payment, says Aneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies. If just 1 in 10 small businesses fails, it would destroy over six million jobs, or 5% of all U.S. employment. And while the PPP has increased the chances that more small businesses survive the virus-driven recession, Markowska notes that the funds have so far helped only about 15% of small companies.

Meanwhile, the protests and riots that have swept across America over the past two weeks reflect the inequity that lived beneath the surface of solid labor-market numbers long before the pandemic struck. Such strains have been exacerbated by the virus, as shown in the latest jobs data, as the virus and lockdowns meant to slow its spread have disproportionately hurt lower-income and minority communities. The unemployment rate among blacks ticked up to 16.8% in May from 16.7% in April, while the unemployment rate among whites fell to 12.4% from 14.2%. The unemployment rate among blacks going into the crisis was double the rate among whites, with whites earning about 26% more, according to BLS data.

It’s clear that the bulk of workers pulled back into the labor market during May were from sectors hit first and worst from the shutdowns. Employment in leisure and hospitality, for example, increased by 1.2 million, following losses of over eight million since March. The quicker return of workers to these industries, often lower-paying and with a relatively high concentration of minority workers, is a reason for optimism. But it should come with a dose of caution. Daco says September and October will be good guides for assessing how well the economy is recovering, offering better insight into whether recent job gains stick and can be built upon quickly.

Until then, a breather might be warranted for investors. “I’d be cautious,” Daco says, calling markets expensive and valuations stretched. Markets have good reason to blow off the bad and rally on the good, given promises by the Federal Reserve to aggressively intervene. But the Fed can’t create consumer demand, and fiscal aid will eventually expire, leaving an economy that must be able to absorb millions of workers before it can be declared back to normal.

Barrons : Twitter Is Once Again Leading the National Debate. Jack Dorsey Says He

Celebrate Friday’s Jobs Surprise. Then Look Beyond the Headlines.

No one saw it coming. Instead of showing that millions more Americans had lost their jobs in May, the latest employment report showed that payrolls rose by 2.5 million as the U.S. economy began to reopen after months of business shutdowns and consumer quarantines.

The stock market rightfully celebrated what was the biggest labor-market surprise in history and, more importantly, evidence that rehiring the more than 22 million people who have become unemployed since March is under way. The S&P 500 climbed 2.7% Friday, leaving it up 5% on the week and all but erasing its year-to-date loss, and the Nasdaq Composite notched an intraday record high.

It is too soon, however, for investors to let their guards down.

The headline numbers look great, but it’s going to be a long road to recovery, says Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. It is a positive development that we’re starting out on that road earlier than economists predicted (on average they expected nonfarm payrolls to decline by eight million in May). But Daco says investors shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that we’re still 20 million jobs in the hole and facing an unemployment rate that, at 13.3%, is four times as high as a few months ago.

Surprise Gains, and a Hidden Pain
U.S. businesses added 2.5 million nonfarm jobs in May, defying expectations for over 8million job cuts. Those gains helped bring down the main unemployment rate, but abroader measure of joblessness suggests that more than 20% of the overall labor poolis unemployed.


Nor should investors forget that some of the gains were surely driven by temporary fiscal-support programs, or that the possibility of a second wave of contagion looms as states reopen. Even if you look past the still-sky-high unemployment rate that fell from April, a broader, more meaningful measure of unemployment that captures part-time workers is sitting at 21.2%. What’s more, the headline figure only slipped on the surface, masking a rise to over 16% because of what the Labor Department says is a problem with how survey respondents characterize their absence from work.

One reason Daco says investors shouldn’t be overly euphoric: He forecasts just 60% of the jobs claimed by the coronavirus pandemic will be recovered by year’s end, translating to about 13 million still out of work and an unemployment rate of about 10% heading into 2021. That we’ve already recovered 2.5 million of the lost jobs is reassuring, but it will take time to determine how many of those rehired remain on payrolls and how quickly the pace picks up.

Uncertainty surrounding the pace of future hiring and the stickiness of last month’s jobs gains stems in part from the Payroll Protection Program, part of the Cares Act meant to encourage small businesses to rehire furloughed workers. For the loans to be forgiven, companies have needed to use 75% of the funds to rehire workers by June 30. A bill signed on Friday by President Trump relaxes those restrictions, potentially helping more small businesses survive the virus shock, but it also may result in a rehiring delay. Moreover, companies that hired back workers in anticipation of the original deadline could shed some of those employees once their PPP loan is forgiven.

Reading the Rates
The main unemployment rate fell to 13.3% in May from 14.7% in April, but a broadermeasure of joblessness suggests that more than 20% of the overall labor pool isunemployed
To that point, the Labor Department said in its May report that workers who were paid by their employer for all or any part of the pay period including the 12th of the month were counted as employed, even if they weren’t actually at their jobs. As anecdotal reporting by Barron’s has shown, some employers have paid workers with PPP funds even as they remained closed or faced little to no customer demand. All of that shows the program has been working, but it raises questions about the sustainability of the jobs it has helped fund—especially if sweetened unemployment benefits expire as planned in July and millions remain unemployed at a time when the U.S. economy is as dependent as ever on the ability and willingness of consumers to spend.

In a sign of the pain across the small-business sector, which accounts for about half of overall employment, 10% of small firms have already missed a loan payment, says Aneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies. If just 1 in 10 small businesses fails, it would destroy over six million jobs, or 5% of all U.S. employment. And while the PPP has increased the chances that more small businesses survive the virus-driven recession, Markowska notes that the funds have so far helped only about 15% of small companies.

Meanwhile, the protests and riots that have swept across America over the past two weeks reflect the inequity that lived beneath the surface of solid labor-market numbers long before the pandemic struck. Such strains have been exacerbated by the virus, as shown in the latest jobs data, as the virus and lockdowns meant to slow its spread have disproportionately hurt lower-income and minority communities. The unemployment rate among blacks ticked up to 16.8% in May from 16.7% in April, while the unemployment rate among whites fell to 12.4% from 14.2%. The unemployment rate among blacks going into the crisis was double the rate among whites, with whites earning about 26% more, according to BLS data.

It’s clear that the bulk of workers pulled back into the labor market during May were from sectors hit first and worst from the shutdowns. Employment in leisure and hospitality, for example, increased by 1.2 million, following losses of over eight million since March. The quicker return of workers to these industries, often lower-paying and with a relatively high concentration of minority workers, is a reason for optimism. But it should come with a dose of caution. Daco says September and October will be good guides for assessing how well the economy is recovering, offering better insight into whether recent job gains stick and can be built upon quickly.

Until then, a breather might be warranted for investors. “I’d be cautious,” Daco says, calling markets expensive and valuations stretched. Markets have good reason to blow off the bad and rally on the good, given promises by the Federal Reserve to aggressively intervene. But the Fed can’t create consumer demand, and fiscal aid will eventually expire, leaving an economy that must be able to absorb millions of workers before it can be declared back to normal.

Barrons : Twitter Is Once Again Leading the National Debate. Jack Dorsey Says He

Twitter Is Once Again Leading the National Debate. Jack Dorsey Says He’s Ready This Time.

Twitter went public in 2013 with a bold mission statement to investors. It pledged to enable “any voice to echo around the world instantly and unfiltered.” Unlike many tech start-ups, Twitter lived up to its hype. But over time, its “unfiltered” promise has turned into a political liability.

Last last month, Twitter (ticker: TWTR) angered its most famous user by tagging some of President Donald Trump’s tweets as needing a fact check or glorifying violence. The president dashed off an order aimed at stripping the social platform and its peers of legal protections around hosting content. Legal experts doubt the order will stand up in court, but Trump’s action knocked 9% off Twitter’s stock.

The stock already had challenges aplenty. At a recent $35, Twitter shares have underperformed the broad market and rivals like Facebook (FB) and Snap (SNAP). Over the past 12 months, Twitter is down 3%, versus a 37% gain for Facebook and a 13% rise for the S&P 500 index. But there are signs of a turnaround. For investors able to stomach ongoing political debate, Twitter stock could bring substantial gains in the year ahead.

Most analysts still rate Twitter shares at Hold. In March, two fund managers pushed their way onto Twitter’s board. The lukewarm sentiment, and the arrival of activist investors, convey the investment community’s impatience with co-founder and CEO Jack Dorsey and his ability to grow Twitter’s ad revenue at a pace commensurate with its user growth.

“Some people don’t understand why we haven’t realized our full opportunity,” Dorsey tells Barron’s. “And to that I say, ‘We will.’ ”

Dorsey has no choice. New directors from Silver Lake and Elliott Management have brought a sense of urgency to Twitter’s boardroom, just as the company is once again navigating its role in the world’s raging cultural debates. Twitter does have one thing any executive would like: attention—and loads of it.

Twitter executives tell Barron’s that the company is working hard to roll out overdue innovations for users and advertisers. Covid-19 hit Twitter’s advertising revenue harder than its peers, because so many Twitter ad campaigns are driven by sports events, concerts, and product launches. That’s all on hold. But it also makes the stock a play on the economy’s grand reopening. While that plays out, Twitter’s time in the headlines is boosting user growth.

This past Wednesday, Twitter’s mobile app was downloaded 677,000 times across the world, the company’s best-ever one-day performance, according to app tracker Apptopia. Twitter also set a record for active daily users, Apptopia notes, with 40 million people using the app in the U.S.

For now, analysts expect the company’s “daily active user” count to jump 18% this year, to 179 million. But the latest app data suggest that the growth will be better.

By traditional metrics, Twitter’s stock isn’t cheap. It trades at 80-plus times Wall Street’s per-share earnings estimates for 2020. But performance is depressed by the pandemic. Analysts see revenue sliding 6% this year, before jumping 22% in 2021 to lift earnings by 75%, to 66 cents a share.

But analysts are probably underestimating the impact of Twitter’s growing influence on the world stage.

Left Out of the Party
Twitter shares have struggled to keep up in the past year, even as Facebook hassoared. An ad-industry veteran says Twitter would benefit from adding features thatslow users down so they engage with ads. “Their problem is they have a very highscroll speed among their experienced users,” the ad insider says. “When you have 10or 12 tweets on the screen, you kind of blow by the ads.”.


Twitter went public in 2013 with a bold mission statement to investors. It pledged to enable “any voice to echo around the world instantly and unfiltered.” Unlike many tech start-ups, Twitter lived up to its hype. But over time, its “unfiltered” promise has turned into a political liability.

Last last month, Twitter (ticker: TWTR) angered its most famous user by tagging some of President Donald Trump’s tweets as needing a fact check or glorifying violence. The president dashed off an order aimed at stripping the social platform and its peers of legal protections around hosting content. Legal experts doubt the order will stand up in court, but Trump’s action knocked 9% off Twitter’s stock.

The stock already had challenges aplenty. At a recent $35, Twitter shares have underperformed the broad market and rivals like Facebook (FB) and Snap (SNAP). Over the past 12 months, Twitter is down 3%, versus a 37% gain for Facebook and a 13% rise for the S&P 500 index. But there are signs of a turnaround. For investors able to stomach ongoing political debate, Twitter stock could bring substantial gains in the year ahead.

Most analysts still rate Twitter shares at Hold. In March, two fund managers pushed their way onto Twitter’s board. The lukewarm sentiment, and the arrival of activist investors, convey the investment community’s impatience with co-founder and CEO Jack Dorsey and his ability to grow Twitter’s ad revenue at a pace commensurate with its user growth.

“Some people don’t understand why we haven’t realized our full opportunity,” Dorsey tells Barron’s. “And to that I say, ‘We will.’ ”

Dorsey has no choice. New directors from Silver Lake and Elliott Management have brought a sense of urgency to Twitter’s boardroom, just as the company is once again navigating its role in the world’s raging cultural debates. Twitter does have one thing any executive would like: attention—and loads of it.

Twitter executives tell Barron’s that the company is working hard to roll out overdue innovations for users and advertisers. Covid-19 hit Twitter’s advertising revenue harder than its peers, because so many Twitter ad campaigns are driven by sports events, concerts, and product launches. That’s all on hold. But it also makes the stock a play on the economy’s grand reopening. While that plays out, Twitter’s time in the headlines is boosting user growth.

This past Wednesday, Twitter’s mobile app was downloaded 677,000 times across the world, the company’s best-ever one-day performance, according to app tracker Apptopia. Twitter also set a record for active daily users, Apptopia notes, with 40 million people using the app in the U.S.

For now, analysts expect the company’s “daily active user” count to jump 18% this year, to 179 million. But the latest app data suggest that the growth will be better.

By traditional metrics, Twitter’s stock isn’t cheap. It trades at 80-plus times Wall Street’s per-share earnings estimates for 2020. But performance is depressed by the pandemic. Analysts see revenue sliding 6% this year, before jumping 22% in 2021 to lift earnings by 75%, to 66 cents a share.

But analysts are probably underestimating the impact of Twitter’s growing influence on the world stage.

Left Out of the Party
Twitter shares have struggled to keep up in the past year, even as Facebook hassoared. An ad-industry veteran says Twitter would benefit from adding features thatslow users down so they engage with ads. “Their problem is they have a very highscroll speed among their experienced users,” the ad insider says. “When you have 10or 12 tweets on the screen, you kind of blow by the ads.”.


Matt Nelson, the “dogfather” of @WeRateDogs had just started college in 2015, when he began tweeting funny one-liners with dog photos. Within five days, he had 10,000 followers. Nelson now has more than 12 million, far more than Dorsey, whose @jack has 4.6 million followers. Nelson supports himself by selling WeRateDogs merchandise.

“Most people see Twitter as a news app, and the news is bad,” Nelson says. “I represent a kind of break from the madness.”

Twitter’s user count grew smartly in its first years, and advertisers paid to put their brands in front of that audience. Ad revenue doubled in each of the company’s first five years. By the time of Twitter’s 2013 initial public offering, it had positive operating cash flows and revenue was growing so fast that investors didn’t worry about the net losses after the cost of stock compensation.

User growth, however, slowed sharply in 2015, and so did growth in ad revenue. That year, Dorsey returned to the CEO role, after leaving in 2008 to start payments company Square (SQ). The Twitter turnaround gig was supposed to be an interim position. Five years later, he’s still running both companies, making him the rare dual-company CEO.

Dorsey has arguably been forced into double duty because of Twitter’s long struggle to turn its cultural relevance into dollars. In 2015, Twitter allowed users to add live video to their text postings. It doubled its per-tweet character limit to 280 in 2017. Still, revenue declined that year.

“We were in a really dark place,” recalls Matt Derella, the company’s vice president of content partnerships.

By 2018, there were signs of progress, with ad growth resuming as some of the company’s initiatives took flight. Sports fans could view streaming player interviews and game highlights in near-real time as they watched World Cup soccer games and the National Football League. The associated ads boosted revenue 25% in 2018, giving Twitter its first year of net income. Last year, revenue grew another 14%, to $3.5 billion. Twitter earned $1.9 billion, or $2.37 a share.

Twitter’s daily user count increased some 10% in 2018. That growth rate doubled in 2019. Then, as much of the world sheltered at home in the first quarter of this year, Twitter’s daily users increased 24% year over year, to 166 million. That was the biggest gain of any big platform. But the pandemic hurt ad sales, and March-quarter revenue was flat at $800 million. The sales shortfall reduced Twitter’s bottom line to break-even.



Matt Nelson, the “dogfather” of @WeRateDogs had just started college in 2015, when he began tweeting funny one-liners with dog photos. Within five days, he had 10,000 followers. Nelson now has more than 12 million, far more than Dorsey, whose @jack has 4.6 million followers. Nelson supports himself by selling WeRateDogs merchandise.

“Most people see Twitter as a news app, and the news is bad,” Nelson says. “I represent a kind of break from the madness.”

Twitter’s user count grew smartly in its first years, and advertisers paid to put their brands in front of that audience. Ad revenue doubled in each of the company’s first five years. By the time of Twitter’s 2013 initial public offering, it had positive operating cash flows and revenue was growing so fast that investors didn’t worry about the net losses after the cost of stock compensation.

User growth, however, slowed sharply in 2015, and so did growth in ad revenue. That year, Dorsey returned to the CEO role, after leaving in 2008 to start payments company Square (SQ). The Twitter turnaround gig was supposed to be an interim position. Five years later, he’s still running both companies, making him the rare dual-company CEO.

Dorsey has arguably been forced into double duty because of Twitter’s long struggle to turn its cultural relevance into dollars. In 2015, Twitter allowed users to add live video to their text postings. It doubled its per-tweet character limit to 280 in 2017. Still, revenue declined that year.

“We were in a really dark place,” recalls Matt Derella, the company’s vice president of content partnerships.

By 2018, there were signs of progress, with ad growth resuming as some of the company’s initiatives took flight. Sports fans could view streaming player interviews and game highlights in near-real time as they watched World Cup soccer games and the National Football League. The associated ads boosted revenue 25% in 2018, giving Twitter its first year of net income. Last year, revenue grew another 14%, to $3.5 billion. Twitter earned $1.9 billion, or $2.37 a share.

Twitter’s daily user count increased some 10% in 2018. That growth rate doubled in 2019. Then, as much of the world sheltered at home in the first quarter of this year, Twitter’s daily users increased 24% year over year, to 166 million. That was the biggest gain of any big platform. But the pandemic hurt ad sales, and March-quarter revenue was flat at $800 million. The sales shortfall reduced Twitter’s bottom line to break-even.

But low expectations can lead to the kind of surprises that drive stocks higher. And Twitter executives are under intense pressure to make the new things work. If patience with Dorsey’s team runs out, well, Elliott Management could force a CEO change, or even an acquisition. The activist’s targets often get acquired at a premium, including Mentor Graphics in 2017 and Athenahealth in 2018.

Twitter, meanwhile, has become an excellent play on a post-Covid-19 economic recovery. Most of the events and product launches that drive Twitter’s traditional ads are paused, but not canceled, notes vice president Derella.

“When the world comes back on,” he says, “we will be in a really strong position.”

NY Post : Inside the shady world of promoters who recruit ‘hot girls’ for partie

For years, Ashley Mears would get text messages from Thibault,* a Manhattan club promoter she met when she was a model in the early 2000s.

“He would always text the same thing, like, ‘Oh baby, sushi dinner this weekend. Are you coming?’ ” recalled Mears.

Still, she never blocked his messages. Plenty of her acquaintances knew Thibault: He and his crew were notorious for hanging around modeling agencies, pursuing beautiful young women to fill VIP tables at exclusive nightclubs like 1OAK and Lavo. And she remained intrigued.

So, finally, in 2011 — after she had left New York City for a sociology professorship at Boston University — she responded to one of his invites.

“I was like, ‘I’m curious about this sushi dinner. Yeah, I’ll come,’ ” she said.

Mears wasn’t too impressed with the meal, but what she witnessed at the club after dinner was something else.

“I had never seen bottle service at that scale before,” she said. “There were these parades of the bottles that came out with sparklers, and the cocktail waitresses in these tight, revealing dresses carried these bottles that were burning. I found it really fascinating.”

For the next year and a half, from late 2011 to early 2013, Mears documented this world of promoters and the models they recruited just to hang out and look pretty at events in exchange for nothing more than free drinks, gifts, even rent. Tall, slender with high cheekbones and doe-like eyes, Mears easily embedded herself into the “models and bottles” scene, though at 31 she was a good decade older than many of the other women invited.

As depicted in her new book, “Very Important People: Status and Beauty in the Global Party Circuit” (Princeton University Press), Mears met and interviewed 44 promoters, who are paid by clubs or by rich clients to bring models — referred to as “girls” — to their parties. She followed them through clubs in New York City, mansion fetes in the Hamptons, festivals in Miami and yachts in the Mediterranean. And like the 20 girls she interviewed, who accompanied these men, she got to enjoy $1,700 bottles of champagne, “vacations” in Cannes and St. Tropez and even, briefly, a loft apartment in Union Square.

But she also saw the uglier side of this glamorous life: models losing jobs because they were too hungover to make appointments after partying all night, a client forcing champagne down a girl’s throat when she didn’t look like she was having sufficient fun, even what seemed like low-key extortion and prostitution.

Mears met Thibault the way many models meet promoters: because he was hanging around Soho, looking for attractive young women outside model castings or trendy hangouts like Pinkberry.

Promoters are paid by club owners to bring “quality people” — rich men, celebrities and beautiful women — to their spaces, boosting the image of the club and inspiring wealthy clients to spend their money. They can earn as much as $4,500 a night, depending on how many expensive bottles of champagne they and their girls can squeeze from a wealthy client. Because they often are tasked with doing this five nights a week, they need to keep a robust roster of young, attractive women on their books. And they’ll recruit them by any means necessary.

One promoter Mears interviewed, Ethan, said that he faked his résumé just so he could get an unpaid internship at a top modeling agency.

“I was the first person in there and the last person to leave every day. I put in, like, ten-hour days, for free, five days a week,” said Ethan.

Other promoters had creepier methods — like the guy, now a club owner, who disguised himself as a pizza deliveryman to get past the doorman in a model apartment owned by an agency. (Once inside, he shed his pizza uniform, knocked on doors and invited girls to his parties — he got mostly rejected, but a few agreed.)

Some promoters, like Thibault, were able to get numbers for model apartments owned by agencies and would cold-call these places to invite girls to parties. Once Thibault had Mears call these apartments and asked her to pretend to be a work acquaintance, saying, “Hey, this is Ashley, we met at a casting a while ago.”

“Once I hooked her attention,” Mears writes, “I was to tell her that we were throwing a big party with sushi, and that we would send a driver … to pick her up. I could always add that a celebrity was going to be at the club, like Leonardo DiCaprio or Kanye West.”

Some models didn’t appreciate such tactics — “They are clowns,” one 28-year-old model told Mears of Thibault and his crew.

Yet others found these promoters charming and fun. “Promoters can be the cutest, sweetest, most amazing people ever,” said Nina, a model who hung out with Thibault’s crew — and ended up in a relationship with him.

In fact, the promoters did work hard to cultivate friendships with their girls — taking them bowling, or to the movies, or to kickboxing. They even drove them to their model castings and helped them move apartments, all so they would view going to the club not as something transactional, but as just hanging out with their friend.

The evening always started with a free 10 p.m. dinner at a restaurant, with the expectation that the girl would spend three hours afterward at the club. She was expected to wear a tight dress and high heels — and some promoters even had extra clingy frocks in their cars if a girl came dressed too frumpily.

One model, named Hannah, told Mears about how one girl showed up to a Miami yacht party with an unshaved bikini area. The promoter ordered her to the bathroom to “fix it.”

Nina told Mears of another promoter she had gone out with who tried to prevent her from leaving a club at 1 a.m. He grabbed and shook her, saying, “You’re not gonna leave here … I paid for your drink, so now you stay here at least until 3.”

Most of the time, girls can leave a boring party or sever ties with a bad promoter. But some relationships are more like indentured servitude.

Take the promoter team of Pablo and Vanna (one of the rare female promoters Mears encountered), who kept a model apartment on Union Square. As many as seven models at a time lived there for free — in exchange for accompanying Pablo and Vanna to clubs like Provocateur and Marquee from midnight to 3 a.m. four nights a week.

“I don’t look at it as a burden but I look at it as work,” said one of their tenants, Renee.

“We’re, like, representing them,” said another, Catherine. “Like, we understand that we’re there to make them look good … We understand that we’re friends but we’re supporting them; we don’t mind.”

Yet Mears said the two weeks she spent living in the apartment were terrible: trash piled up near the front door, Four Loko energy drinks and full ashtrays littered the living room floor and “dried-out contact lenses stuck to the kitchen counter.”

The mandatory partying also took a toll on the tenants’ career aspirations, too — they often couldn’t wake up early enough to go to castings, or would show up at work looking hungover and unhealthy. One Wednesday night, at 2:30 a.m., Catherine wanted to go home, but one of Pablo’s employees, Toby, told her she had to stay due to her housing agreement.

“I love her,” Toby told Mears while downing shots of tequila, “but that bitch has to stay till 3. That’s the rules! Blame it on the game!”

While most clients were just happy to be around beautiful women, some wanted more. And promoters would benefit from it.

As one promoter admitted: “A client gave me a grand just for gathering together the party. And at the end of the night he actually got laid by two of the girls and he gave me another two grand.”

Yet most of the sex happens not between girls and clients, but between girls and promoters. As one promoter told Mears, “If any promoter tries to tell you that f–king isn’t part of his business plan, he’s a liar.”

Even if a promoter and a girl do fall in love, it generally ends badly. After Nina became pregnant with Thibault’s baby, she found out that he was cheating on her with a much younger woman who had been part of their entourage. She left him soon after having the baby and still had not received child support after years of fighting him in court.

So why do young women put up with it? The sore feet, the constant scrutiny, the long hours, the exploitation?

Some women did it to network. One model told Mears she found an internship in finance through the connections she made at clubs. Another, a Columbia University graduate, said she never would have gotten to hobnob with such an elite crowd had she not been a girl at the club.

“You have great conversations with them about what they do and you learn about venture capital or politics or about these sorts of things, so for me it’s sort of an educational thing … How else would I get to talk to a guy who started a venture capital firm or whatever else? I’m not gonna meet him out at a bar on the Lower East Side.”

Yet most of these women aren’t go-getters but young and naive, with little money and few friends in the city. They are happy to receive free meals, free drinks and companionship. Plus for all its problems, nightlife can be dazzling and fun.

As Nora, a 25-year-old ex-model, told her: “You do end up feeling like one of the elite. I know it sounds so stupid, but … it’s being able to hang out with friends and having someone tell you, ‘You’re beautiful,’ so you don’t have to pay for anything.”

Mears agrees. “There are some moments, when the music is right and the venue looks gorgeous and the crowd is in sync that are truly transcendent,” she told The Post. “It’s seductive to be around so much wealth and beauty — it’s an ego-stroke.”