FT : Brussels plans attack on low-tax member states

Brussels plans attack on low-tax member states
Commission measure likely to attract fierce opposition from smaller EU countries

Brussels is planning to pursue low-tax member states over their advantageous corporate tax regimes as pressure mounts on EU policymakers to crack down on sweetheart tax deals in the wake of the Covid-19 crisis. 

In what would amount to an unprecedented legal assault, the European Commission is exploring ways to trigger an unused treaty instrument to reduce multinationals’ ability to exploit highly advantageous corporate tax schemes.

Crucially, unlike ordinary tax legislation in the EU, the initiative would only require the backing of a qualified majority of the EU’s 27 member states rather than unanimous support of all countries, restricting a government’s ability to wield a veto. The measure would also need approval from the European parliament. 

Tax avoidance by multinationals has shot up the political agenda in the wake of the pandemic as governments around the world spend billions to kick-start their economies. The commission has also promised to revive its plans for an EU digital services tax on big technology companies after the US pulled out of international negotiations last month. 

Officials told the Financial Times that the plans, under Article 116 of the EU’s treaty, were at a very early stage but would aim to identify certain competitive national tax schemes as distortions of the single market. They are likely to trigger intense controversy among member states, which fiercely protect their taxation powers.

It is a key week for Brussels’ pursuit of multinational tax avoidance. On Wednesday, the General Court, the EU’s second-highest court, will decide whether the commission was correct to order Apple to pay €13bn in back-taxes to the Irish government in 2016.

Were that decision to be struck down by judges, there would be significant implications for the commission’s ability to pursue multinationals. “If the commission loses the Apple case then it is running out of tools to go after aggressive tax planning,” said one official.

Brussels has in the past made numerous attempts to clamp down on aggressive tax planning schemes, but the moves have been traditionally vetoed by countries with more favourable tax rules. “This could be the key to unblocking the impasse we’ve had so far,” said a southern European diplomat.

Another diplomat said the commission was taking its time preparing the highly sensitive measure as Brussels needed guarantees that it would not be struck down by a blocking minority of governments. The commission declined to comment.

Article 116 of the EU treaty gives Brussels the powers to correct “distortions” in the single market, but has never been used. The instrument allows the commission to propose a directive designed to correct distorting tax schemes and sue governments at the European Court of Justice if they do not comply.

The measure is likely to target schemes in countries such as the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium and Ireland, said one official. Diplomats expect the plans to be fiercely resisted by some member states, opening up the prospect of years of lengthy legal battles at the ECJ.

Paul Tang, a Dutch MEP and incoming head of the European parliament’s subcommittee on tax, said: “Bringing Article 116 into play could stop unfair practices in EU tax havens. It is a race to the bottom which benefits a small few at the expense of the rest. This is unacceptable, especially in difficult economic times.”

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 14th of Juluy 2020 - V2(+)

>>> Up
* Connect Group Raised to Buy at Berenberg; PT 27 pence (+)
* DWF Group Raised to Buy at Shore Capital (+)
* Essity Raised to Hold at DNB Markets; PT 295 kronor
* Ferrovial Raised to Neutral at CaixaBank BPI; PT 26.30 euros
* G4S Raised to Buy at Deutsche Bank
* Hexagon Raised to Hold at Handelsbanken; PT 615 kronor
* IMI Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 1,140 pence
* Morgan Advanced Raised to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 275 pence
* Nordic Semiconductor Raised to Buy at Danske Bank Markets (+)
* Orkla Raised to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 80 kroner
* Recipharm Raised to Buy at Handelsbanken; PT 151 kronor
* Restaurant Group Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 80 pence
* Scor Raised to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 30 euros
* SKF Raised to Buy at Goldman; PT 214 kronor

>>> Down
* *CENTAMIN CUT TO HOLD VS BUY AT BERENBERG, PT 200P
* Henkel Cut to Hold at Bankhaus Metzler; PT 86 eurosv (+)
* Primary Health Cut to Hold at Berenberg; PT 155 pence
* QinetiQ Cut to Underperform at BofA (+)
* Rotork Cut to Underperform at RBC; PT 275 pence
* Sinch Cut to Sell at Danske Bank Markets; PT 700 kronor (+)
* Thales Cut to Neutral at BofA (+)
* Thule Cut to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 250 kronor
* Wartsila Cut to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 7.50 euros

>>> Initiation
* HSBC Holdings Resumed Sell at Deutsche Bank; PT 335 pence
* Lloyds Resumed Hold at Deutsche Bank; PT 34 pence
* RBS Resumed Sell at Deutsche Bank; PT 100 pence
* Standard Chartered Resumed Hold at Deutsche Bank; PT 415 pence
* Virgin Money UK Resumed Buy at Deutsche Bank; PT 105 pence

>>> Call
* Europe 2Q Results to Show Good Beat on Low Expectations: MS (+)
* Restaurant Group Raised at RBC After Accelerated Restructuring
* RBC Says Be Selective on European Industrials, Upgrades IMI
* Ocado 1H Ebitda Beat Driven by Retail Strength: Numis (+)
* Partners Update Encouraging, Assets Under Management Beat: Citi (+)
* Reinsurance Pricing Momentum to Continue, Scor Upgraded: MS
* QinetiQ, Thales Both Downgraded at BofA on Defense-Budget Risk
* Swatch Costs Seem Well Managed Amid Tough 1H: RBC (+)

Economist : What if aviation doesn’t recover from covid-19?

What if aviation doesn’t recover from covid-19?

How the pandemic transformed the travel industry. An imagined scenario from May 2022

In september 2019 a group of climate activists formulated a plan to shut down London Heathrow, Europe’s largest airport. Heathrow Pause, a splinter group of the Extinction Rebellion movement, had been inspired by an incident at Gatwick the previous year, when an unauthorised drone closed Britain’s second-largest hub for three days. They hoped to repeat the trick at Heathrow. But their drones failed to get off the ground, due to signal-jamming by the airport. In December 2019, Extinction Rebellion tried again to close Heathrow, this time by blocking its entrance road with a pink bulldozer. But police confined the protest to a single lane of traffic, meaning that incoming passengers could simply drive around the problem.

The activists lying in front of the bulldozer that cold December morning could not have known that a virus just 0.1 microns wide, more than 8,000km away in China, was inadvertently about to help their cause. Few industries were harder hit by the subsequent covid-19 pandemic than air travel. Government lockdowns, travel restrictions and cancellations by fearful passengers soon grounded most of the industry. By April 2020 Heathrow’s passenger numbers had fallen by 97% to the lowest monthly figure since the 1950s. Global passenger numbers did little better, falling that month by 94% year on year, to levels last seen in 1978. Half a year of lost revenue later—amounting to well over $250bn—the industry’s finances were in ruins.

Two years on, the forecast made in May 2020 by the International Air Transport Association (iata) that passenger numbers would return to pre-pandemic levels by 2023 now looks wildly optimistic. But the trade body’s prediction that only 30 of the world’s 700 or so airlines would survive the crisis without government help was spot on. Carriers that failed to get bail-outs fell like dominoes, starting with Flybe, Europe’s largest regional airline, in March 2020, Virgin Australia in April and latam, Latin America’s largest carrier, in May. Sir Richard Branson, founder of the Virgin Group, became an illustration of his old quip: “The easiest way to become a millionaire is to start out as a billionaire and then go into the airline business.”

Even airlines that got government bail-outs did not find life easy. Austria and France led the way by imposing strict environmental conditions. Airlines were forced to cut their emissions to meet aggressive targets and to end competition against greener alternatives such as high-speed rail. That raised their costs and limited their potential revenue. And they were soon cash-strapped again. America’s airlines quickly chewed through $25bn in federal grants and loans; Air France-klm and Lufthansa of Germany did the same with bail-outs worth nearly €10bn ($11bn) each. The result was a drastic slimming down of the world’s flag-carriers.

Airline executives had initially thought the pandemic would cause manageable, but not catastrophic, disruption. Looking at previous epidemics in Asia, such as sars in 2002-03 and the South Korean outbreak of mers in 2015, iata expected a sharp dip in traffic, followed by a return to the original trend six or seven months later. In retrospect, that was overly hopeful. A short, stuttering recovery during the autumn of 2020 was choked off by the pandemic’s second wave of infections. “This time is very different,” says Leigh Bochicchio of the Association of Corporate Travel Executives, an American industry association. “It’s a very different beast to sars or 9/11.” After those earlier shocks, there was no second wave of infections or terror attacks to remind people of the danger of flying.

And in retrospect, sars was much easier for airlines to manage than covid-19. sars showed symptoms immediately and could be detected with temperature checks at airports. It was not initially contagious; those infected could be isolated before they spread it to others. Covid-19, in contrast, shows no symptoms for up to two weeks after infection, a period in which it is contagious. No wonder experts soon found that airline travel was the primary means by which the disease spread around the world.

In the past, the airline industry has always fully recovered from crises. But this time has been different. “Peak plane”, once Extinction Rebellion’s fantasy, no longer looks so inconceivable. With the prospects for a vaccine still uncertain, business travel began to pick up again in 2021, though only as a trickle. The biggest global downturn since the Depression left corporate travel budgets an easy cost-code to squeeze.

Even firms that are solvent enough to let their employees fly have not been keen to do so. “People are more comfortable with online meetings, and that will never go away,” notes Ms Bochicchio. After the global financial crisis of 2007-09, international business travel fell by a third in many countries, and never recovered. Companies found new ways of doing business using video calls. That story repeated itself in spades after covid-19. Many corporate events and conferences have gone online permanently. Another chilling effect was that firms feared being sued by employees who caught covid-19 on business trips—a possibility their insurers increasingly refused to cover. As a result, the average age of business travellers is now falling: surveys show millennials are more likely to regard business travel as a status symbol than older workers, and consider themselves at less risk from covid-19.

Leisure travel has been much slower to recover. That was not due to any initial reluctance to get back in the sky. Surveys during the pandemic found that 69% of Americans said they missed travelling. Half of Chinese expected to travel more once the crisis was over. Perhaps most remarkably of all, 23% of Britons said they planned to be on the first flight deemed safe.

But many newly established “air bridges” and “travel bubbles”—pairs and groups of countries between which travellers could move without quarantine—collapsed in panic when the second wave of the pandemic hit in autumn 2020. “Staycations”—holidaying within one’s own country—became the norm in 2021, as crowded aeroplane cabins were shunned in favour of cars, trains and even cruise ships (which, despite their association with the early weeks of the outbreak, turn out to be well suited to social distancing).

The aviation industry did its best to win back customers with a marketing blitz, but cabin crew dressed in personal protective equipment, who treated all passengers as biohazards, failed to reassure. The requirement to leave middle seats empty, to maintain social distancing, was dropped by governments when airlines complained that it cut their capacity. But that prompted concerns that airlines were more concerned with profits than with passenger safety.

The end of low-cost flights
Rising ticket prices have also deterred travellers from flying away on holiday. Although fares initially fell to put bums back on seats after the first and second waves—dropping by 35% in 2021, just as Dollar Flight Club, an American travel website, had predicted—the low prices didn’t last long. Ryanair, Wizz Air and Air Asia, the world’s biggest budget carriers after the pandemic, waged the “mother of all fare wars” in an effort to put all non-state-subsidised rivals out of business in Europe and Asia. The resulting consolidation has left little competition in the industry. As soon as they could, airlines began to pass on the extra cost of their new counter-coronavirus measures to passengers. Analysts think fares could soon be double what they were before the pandemic.

Perhaps the clearest sign of the long-term change in direction for aviation has been the collapse in demand for new aircraft. The world’s two biggest planemakers, Airbus and Boeing, predicted just before the pandemic that global air travel would grow by 4.3% each year over the next 20 years, requiring around 40,000 new airliners to be built. Now they are not so sure. Airlines permanently grounded over 5,000 planes during the pandemic. Boeing cut future production by 50% and cancelled plans to develop two new airliners in the coming decade. Even Airbus, which has enough orders to keep its assembly lines busy for a decade, decided to slow production by 30%.

The biggest casualties were the biggest birds. Boeing 747 jumbos, once the “Queens of the Skies”, were nearly all grounded in 2020, never to fly again. The even-larger superjumbo fared almost as badly. “The a380 is over,” lamented Sir Tim Clark of Emirates during the pandemic. Having once owned 115 of the 242 in existence, Emirates retired 40% of them in 2020.

Planemakers and airlines alike are pinning hopes of a travel revival on the wanderlust of the young, and of the rising middle classes in the developing world. Their faith may be misplaced. The young are highly climate-conscious and have taken to “train-bragging”, encouraged by campaigners such as Greta Thunberg. Several European governments have stepped up investment in high-speed rail as part of their stimulus packages. Polls suggest people under 25 see climate change and pollution as the two most important issues facing the world. In the developing world, meanwhile, the pandemic shattered the illusion in Africa and India that travelling by plane was any safer or more hygienic than overcrowded diesel trains or by car.

That covid-19 has exposed the fragility of globalisation is particularly apparent in the case of aviation. The industry can no longer rely on the steady growth of the past, or indeed any growth at all. Yet historians will write that it was not radical environmental movements such as Extinction Rebellion that killed the trend. Instead it was the combination of a microscopic virus and free-market capitalism.

The five-year period before the pandemic was the only one since Orville and Wilbur Wright made their first flight in 1903 in which the industry covered its cost of capital. Burned again by covid-19, many investors have now decided to stay away from anything that flies. Warren Buffett, a billionaire investor, once quipped that “if a farsighted capitalist had been present at Kitty Hawk, he would have done his successors a huge favour by shooting Orville down.” During the pandemic, Mr Buffett realised that this historical observation was no joke. Selling his shares in American airlines at a multi-billion dollar loss, he noted that they should be avoided by investors. His reason: “The world has changed after covid-19.” ■

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • HelloFresh (HFG TH) +3.6%
    • HelloFresh Sees 2Q Rev, Adj Ebitda Significantly Above Estimates
  • Banco Santander (BSD2 TH) +1%
  • BP (BPE5 TH) +0.6%
  • Hexagon (HXGB TH) +0.6%
    • Hexagon Shares Seen Gaining After 2Q Pre-Release
  • Zalando (ZAL TH) -2.5%
  • Airbus (AIR TH) -2.5%
    • Airbus Burns 4.7 Billion Euros as Deliveries Falter: 2Q Preview
  • MTU Aero (MTX TH) -2.6%
  • AMS (DQW1 TH) -2.6%
  • Infineon (IFX TH) -2.6%
  • Kion (KGX TH) -2.6%
  • MorphoSys (MOR TH) -2.7%
  • SAP (SAP TH) -2.7%
  • TUI (TUI1 TH) -2.9%
  • Puma (PUM TH) -3.3%

>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • E.On (EOAN TH) -1%
  • VW (VOW3 TH) -1%
  • HeidelbergCement (HEI TH) -2%
  • Daimler (DAI TH) -2%
  • SAP (SAP TH) -2.3%
  • Infineon (IFX TH) -2.6%
  • MTU Aero (MTX TH) -2.6%
MDAX:
  • HelloFresh (HFG TH) +4%
    • HelloFresh Sees 2Q Rev, Adj Ebitda Significantly Above Estimates
  • Gerresheimer (GXI TH) -0.2%
    • Gerresheimer Second Quarter Adjusted EPS Beats Highest Estimate
  • Fraport (FRA TH) -1.9%
  • Zalando (ZAL TH) -2.3%
  • Puma (PUM TH) -2.6%
  • Airbus (AIR TH) -2.8%
  • K+S (SDF TH) -4%
SDAX:
  • Wacker Neuson (WAC TH) -2.3%
  • SNP Schneider-Neureither (SHF TH) -2.9%
  • Bertrandt (BDT TH) -3.1%
  • SMA Solar (S92 TH) -3.5%
  • Takkt (TTK TH) -3.8%

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 14th of Juluy 2020

>>> Up
* Essity Raised to Hold at DNB Markets; PT 295 kronor
* Ferrovial Raised to Neutral at CaixaBank BPI; PT 26.30 euros
* G4S Raised to Buy at Deutsche Bank
* Hexagon Raised to Hold at Handelsbanken; PT 615 kronor
* IMI Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 1,140 pence
* Morgan Advanced Raised to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 275 pence
* Orkla Raised to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 80 kroner
* Recipharm Raised to Buy at Handelsbanken; PT 151 kronor
* Restaurant Group Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 80 pence
* Scor Raised to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 30 euros
* SKF Raised to Buy at Goldman; PT 214 kronor

>>> Down
* *CENTAMIN CUT TO HOLD VS BUY AT BERENBERG, PT 200P
* Primary Health Cut to Hold at Berenberg; PT 155 pence
* Rotork Cut to Underperform at RBC; PT 275 pence
* Thule Cut to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 250 kronor
* Wartsila Cut to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 7.50 euros

>>> Initiation
* HSBC Holdings Resumed Sell at Deutsche Bank; PT 335 pence
* Lloyds Resumed Hold at Deutsche Bank; PT 34 pence
* RBS Resumed Sell at Deutsche Bank; PT 100 pence
* Standard Chartered Resumed Hold at Deutsche Bank; PT 415 pence
* Virgin Money UK Resumed Buy at Deutsche Bank; PT 105 pence

>>> Call
* Restaurant Group Raised at RBC After Accelerated Restructuring
* RBC Says Be Selective on European Industrials, Upgrades IMI
* Reinsurance Pricing Momentum to Continue, Scor Upgraded: MS

>>> What to look aty today - 14th of July 2020

Asian stocks declined Tuesday amid fresh Sino-American tensions and concern over the economic impact of rising coronavirus cases. Crude oil fell.
Shares retreated across the region with Hong Kong stocks faring worst. S&P 500 Index futures fluctuated after the benchmark briefly touched its highest since the pandemic sell-off in March, before closing lower. The Nasdaq hit another record before finishing in the red. Treasuries were steady and the dollar nudged higher.
US After Hours MHK -6.7% falls as it discloses receipt of subpoenas; VNDA +9.3% as it receives FDA authorization for protocol

Nikkei -0.88% Hang Seng -1.52% CSI -2.03% Shanghai -2.06% Shenzen -2.40%

Eur$ 1.1335 CNH 7.0131 CNY 7.0108 JPY 107.19 GBP 1.2542 CHF 0.9422 RUB 70.9239 WTI$ 39.12 -2.44%

S&P +0.06% Nasdaq +0.20% EuroStoxx -1.68% FTSE -1.25% Dax -1.80% SMI -0.77%

Macro :
- WHO Says Pandemic to Linger; Cases Pass 13 Million: Virus Update
- Billions Flow Into Quant ETFs Behaving Just Like the S&P 500
- Morgan Stanley Says Investors Overweight EM Bonds, Neutral EMFX
- Biden To Call for $2 Trillion in Clean Energy Spending
- Trump Admin. Plans to Scrap Audit Deal With China, Reuters Says
- SoftBank Exploring Options for Arm Holdings Including Sale: DJ

Keep an eye on :
- ALT US : *ALTIMMUNE PRICES OFFERING OF STOCK AT $23.00 EACH
- ATL IM : Conte: Expects Decision on Autostrade at Cabinet Tuesday
- AKERBP NO : Aker BP Second Quarter Ebitda Misses Estimates (1)
- BA US : Grounded 737 Max Jets Must Flush Dangerous Fuel, FAA Orders
- CLNX SM : Cellnex Said to Eye Stake in $11 Billion CK Hutch Tower Arm
- CYAD BB : Celyad Gets FDA Clearance of IND Application for CYAD-211
- CDR SM : Codere Reaches Agreement for EU250m of New Financing
- CWR LN : Ceres Power Holder IP Group to Offer 9.16m Shrs, Ceres Power Orders Below GBP 5.85 Risk Missing Out
- EDF FP : EDF Told to Keep Supplying Nuclear Energy to Total: Les Echos
- EDP PL : EDP Says It Was Notified by Prosecutor to Name a Representative
- ERICB SS : Huawei Faces Ban on Selling 5G Kit to U.K. by End of This Year
- EL FP : EU Demands EssilorLuxottica Sell Stores for GrandVision Deal: FT
- GMM GY : Grammer Prelim Second Quarter Ebit Loss About EU50 Mln
- GXI GY : Gerresheimer Second Quarter Adjusted EPS Beats Highest Estimate
- GFJ NO : Gjensidige Second Quarter Net Income Beats Estimates
- HFG GY : HelloFresh Sees 2Q Rev, Adj Ebitda Significantly Above Estimates
- HEXAB SS : Hexagon Reports Preliminary Adjusted Operating Profit of EU226m
- HEXAB SS : Hexagon Shares Seen Gaining After 2Q Pre-Release
- ISP IM : Cattolica Accepts Intesa Exchange Offer on UBI Banca Shares
- DEC FP : JCDecaux Sold Stake in Russian Outdoor Advertising Leader: RBC
- KLOVB SS : Klovern 1H Income From Property Management SEK617 Mln, -18% Y/y
- SKB GY : Koenig & Bauer Seeks EU120m KfW Loan Amid Work on Efficiencies
- LXS GY : Lanxess CEO Confirms 2020 View; Sees Protection Unit Growth: FAZ
- MRL SM : Merlin Purchases EU151.7M of 2022 Notes, EU107.2M of 2023 Notes
- NOKIA FH : Huawei Faces Ban From U.K. 5G Networks Under Crackdown Plan
- NDX1 GY : Nordex Gets 40MW VSB Group Order for Finnish Wind Farm
- OSMT US : Osmotica Pharmaceuticals Offering Prices 5m Shrs at $6.55/Shr
- PGHN SW : Partners Group Assets Under Management $96.3 Bln, +2.4% H/Hn
- ROG SW : Roche Gains a Bull as Diagnostics Weigh: EMEA Health Care Wrap
- SAGAA SS : Sagax Sees Full Year Property Mgmt Income SEK2.30 Bln
- 9984 JP : SoftBank Could Face Valuation Hurdle If It Lists Arm Unit: React
- UHR SW : Swatch First Half Operating Loss Wider Than Estimates
- TEL NO : Telenor’s Digi Sees Medium Single Digit Decline for 2020 Ebitda
- UBI IM : UBI Banca Says Intesa Takeover Is Inappropriate, FT Reports
- UBI FP : Swift Action to Help Ubisoft Rebound From Misconduct Woes: React
- VOW3 GY : EV Startup Fisker in Talks With Volkswagen to Use Parts for SUV
- VOW3 GY : Toyota Executive Concerned Virus-Case Surge Could Cut U.S. Sales
- VOw3 GY : VW Shifting Seating Unit Into Joint Venture With Supplier Brose
- WDI GY : Philippines in Touch With German Regulators on Wirecard: Diokno
- WDI GY : McKinsey Warned Wirecard Year Ago to Take Action on Controls: FT
- Z01 GY : Zooplus Commercial Chief Florian Welz Resigns
- FHZN SW : Zurich Airport June Passengers 201,692

FT : Bad things happen when finance front-runs the economy (M. El-Erian)

Bad things happen when finance front-runs the economy
Governments need to ensure durable growth that benefits more than the well-off in society

For most of the last 15 years, the US economy has relied on a mix of public and private finance to liquefy financial markets, boost asset prices and drive economic growth.

What used to be a sequential process — private sector credit factories at full force during the good times, and massive injections of liquidity from the public sector during the more difficult times — has evolved into a simultaneous one. The resulting explosion in leverage has been cheered by markets and most economists, for now. But it will become a lot more problematic should finance’s front-running of the economy not be validated by strong growth that is also inclusive and sustainable.

Let us start with how we got to the great disconnect between economic and corporate fundamentals and appetites for risk, on the part of both providers and users of debt financing.

Going into the global financial crisis in 2008, private sector credit creation had operated in turbo-charge mode. In addition to buoyant issuance of bonds, there was a very rapid rise in securitisation, which found new ways to lever corporate and household balance sheets while reducing barriers to entry for creditors. But the whole process got carried away, resulting in excessive and unsustainable risk-taking by borrowers and lenders.

As the private sector went into a disorderly mode of deleveraging during the crisis, the public sector had no choice but to step in and do whatever it could to avoid a depression. Government debt and the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet soared — accompanied by assurances from officials that this growth would be reversed once economic growth recovered, and once the private sector had completed its de-levering in an orderly fashion. 

But exiting this regime proved difficult in the post-crisis years. A premature attempt to limit government deficits undermined growth, adding to households’ economic insecurity — especially as the benefits of the meagre growth flowed to the better-off segments of society. Rather than reduce its balance sheet, the Fed felt compelled to expand it, waiting for an elusive policy handoff to those more able to deliver genuine and durable economic growth.

Meanwhile, the private sector went on a borrowing binge as Fed-repressed interest rates encouraged and enabled not only the funding of operational expansion but also — in a much bigger way — the buying back of stock, the paying of high dividends and the pursuit of mergers and acquisitions. Then came the Covid-19 shock to the economy and markets.

Facing a new threat of depression, the public sector pivoted to a “whatever it takes” paradigm. The Fed’s balance sheet exploded — almost doubling to near-$7tn in less than a couple of months — as did US government borrowing, rising by an extra 15 per cent of gross domestic product.

The scale of such policies was once considered unthinkable. To overcome the risks of market malfunction and a credit freeze, the Fed is now underwriting not just liquidity risk and credit risk for high-quality companies, but also the risk of default in the junk-bond market. Fiscal measures have included sending cheques to US households as part of a broad-based relief effort.

The immediate impact on financial markets has been beneficial, and has extended well beyond the remarkable recovery in stocks that drove the Nasdaq Composite through the 10,000 mark for the first time on Tuesday and had the S&P show gains for 2020. Corporate bond issuance has been setting new records, as have inflows of investors’ funds into credit markets, despite very low yields. The spillover effects include more than $300bn of emerging-market bond issuance in the first five months of the year, exceeding levels for the same periods in 2018 and 2019.

This huge rise in financial leverage will prove advisable and sustainable if, and only if, economic growth picks up quickly and validates it. In such a scenario, companies’ and countries’ use of debt to bolster cash buffers and offset massive revenue shortfalls would be deemed to have been a wise way to avoid temporary liquidity problems turning into a crippling solvency risk.

But if growth disappoints, the economy and markets will have to cope with a massive debt overhang that results in even greater central bank distortions of markets and lower growth potential. There will be widespread debt restructurings too, and disorderly non-payments.

Given that this nascent economic recovery is subject to significant uncertainty, the answer is not to quickly de-lever balance sheets. Instead, there is a need for an evolution in approaches. Governments should ensure a stronger foundation for high and durable growth that benefits more than the well-off in society, and investors should be more disciplined in minimising exposures to bankruptcy risk and capital impairments.

Lastly, companies need to resist the temptation to use debt for more financial engineering and higher executive pay.