The Information : Google-Backed Apptronik in Talks to Raise Funding at $5 Billio

Google-Backed Apptronik in Talks to Raise Funding at $5 Billion Valuation

The Takeaway
  • Apptronik in talks to raise $400 million at $5 billion valuation
  • Google DeepMind supplies AI to power Apptronik’s Apollo robots
  • Apollo robots work in Mercedes-Benz, GXO and Jabil facilities

Apptronik, a humanoid robot maker backed by Google, is in the process of raising at least $400 million at a $5 billion valuation not including the new money, according to two people familiar with the discussions.

The new round, led by B Capital, would at least triple the startup’s valuation from earlier this year, when it raised $415 million from investors including Austin’s Capital Factory and venture firm B Capital. Google will invest in the latest round, too, according to those people. Apptronik is developing Apollo: a two-legged, two-armed robot. Late last year, the company said Google would start supplying AI from its DeepMind lab to power the robots.

The high valuation for the nine-year-old startup speaks to growing optimism that humanoid robots will soon be capable enough to take on most physical jobs humans do. Just last week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk claimed that the car maker’s Optimus robots would eventually provide medical care, fight crime and end poverty.

Other large tech companies and entrepreneurs are working on their own humanoids. Chinese electric car maker Xpeng last week showed off the latest version of its own humanoids, which it expects to initially serve in positions such as as company office receptionists and sales assistants. Robotics startup Figure AI last month announced the third generation of its humanoid robot, with a video of the robot performing household chores. And Andy Rubin, a creator of Android, has recently launched a startup focused on humanoid robotics.

Proponents of humanoids argue that they are well suited to eventually take on the wide variety of physical tasks people perform, especially because people have designed the environment around the human body. But their makers face myriad challenges, including mimicking the complex mechanics of a human hand. Due to those challenges, Musk this summer abandoned earlier targets to make thousands of Optimus robots this year.

Apptronik was founded by Jeff Cardenas and Nick Paine, who earned graduate degrees at the University of Texas, Austin, along with engineering professor Luis Sentis, who leads the school’s Human Centered Robotics Laboratory. Paine had previously worked on NASA’s robot entry in the 2015 Darpa Robotics Challenge, a high-profile competition that tested the abilities of humanoid robots to complete disaster-response tasks.

The company initially developed a variety of robots, including stationary torsos and robots on wheeled bases for other robotics makers and large companies, including automakers and government agencies such as NASA. Then, in 2023, it unveiled Apollo, a humanoid intended for mass production.

The robot is working in factories for Mercedes-Benz, also an investor in the startup. Apollo is also working in warehouses for logistics company GXO and factories for manufacturing company Jabil, which also manufactures parts for the robot. All three companies are customers. Apptronik’s recent revenue couldn’t be learned.

With the new funding, Apptronik will have raised over $850 million in total. The founders initially bootstrapped the company with sales of its earlier versions of its robots. Then over the last three years, Tesla began showing off new versions of its Optimus robot, raising the pressure on robotics startups to raise money to pay for hardware, researchers and AI development.

Since Apptronik partnered with Google, it has focused on building the hardware for Apollo and the software to operate the robot, while Google has focused on developing the AI models that will serve as the brain for the robot.

Apptronik is also working with other companies as it tackles challenges such as humanoid hands. It has equipped Apollo with hands from Psyonic, a startup that also develops prosthetic hands for humans. Those hands are also visible in videos that Apptronik released to announce its collaboration with Google DeepMind earlier this year.

Reuters : Some Wall St hedge funds trimmed megacap positions in 3rd quarter

Some Wall St hedge funds trimmed megacap positions in 3rd quarter

NEW YORK, Nov 14 (Reuters) - Wall Street's largest hedge funds reduced exposure to some Magnificent Seven stocks, including Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet and Meta, in the third quarter, while placing new bets in sectors such as application software, e-commerce and payments, according to the latest quarterly disclosures from the funds.

Here are key position changes by some of the funds:

BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES
Bridgewater Associates, which enjoyed a stellar run during the first nine months of the year as it outperformed all its top peers, slashed its stake in Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab by nearly two-thirds to 2.5 million shares and in Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab by more than 50% to 2.65 million shares. The firm also trimmed its stake in Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab by 9.6% to about 1.1 million shares and its holdings in semiconductor industry bellwether Broadcom (AVGO.O), opens new tab by about 27% to 845,391 shares.

The firm increased its exposure to sectors such as application software and payments, as it upped holdings in names like Adobe (ADBE.O), opens new tab, Dynatrace (DT.N), opens new tab and Etsy (ETSY.N), opens new tab.

In a recent note to investors, Bridgewater's chief investment officers, Karen Karniol-Tambour, Greg Jensen and Bob Prince, warned of mounting risks to the current market stability and

Bridgewater was founded in 1975 by Dalio, who recently in the firm. The hedge fund currently has $92.1 billion in assets under management.

DISCOVERY CAPITAL
Discovery Capital, which was founded by Rob Citrone, took new positions in names like Alphabet, steel maker Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF.N), opens new tab, and health insurers Cigna (CI.N), opens new tab and Elevance Health (ELV.N), opens new tab.

Citrone's hedge fund, which generated a 52% windfall on its investments last year, has increased its exposure to Latin America as part of a strategy to diversify from U.S. holdings.

For the quarter ended September 30, the fund exited positions in several exploration and production companies in the energy industry such as EQT (EQT.N), opens new tab, Antero Resources (AR.N), opens new tab and Range Resource (RRC.N), opens new tab, while placing a new bet on oilfield services giant Baker Hughes (BKR.O), opens new tab. Discovery also doubled down on its bet on critical minerals producer Ramaco Resources (METC.O), opens new tab.

Citrone, who earlier this year picked Mexico's America Movil (AMXB.MX), opens new tab as his favorite stock due to its exposure to many countries in Latin America, trimmed his holdings in the company by about 11.5% to 4.68 million shares, valuing the stake at about $98.3 million.

BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT
Dmitry Balyasny's multi-strategy hedge fund Balyasny Asset Management increased its stake several-fold in iPhone maker Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, even as others including Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab trimmed their exposure to the tech giant.

Like a number of its top peers, Balyasny slashed its stake in Amazon by about 41%.

The firm also increased positions in insurers American International Group (AIG.N), opens new tab and Allstate (ALL.N), opens new tab, while taking a new position in digital infrastructure firm American Tower (AMT.N), opens new tab.

TIGER GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
Tiger Global Management, founded and led by Chase Coleman, slashed its stake in Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab during the third quarter.

During the quarter ended September 30, Tiger Global reduced its holdings in Meta to 2.8 million shares, valuing the stake at about $2.1 billion. The firm dissolved its positions in some other high-profile names including drugmakers Eli Lilly LLY.N, opens new tab, Novo Nordisk NOVOb.CO, opens new tab and cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike CRWD.O, opens new tab.

Tiger Global, an offshoot of famed investor Julian Robertson's firm and part of a cohort of stock-picking funds popularly known as Tiger Cubs, took new positions in streaming giant Netflix NFLX.O, opens new tab and buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna KLAR.N, opens new tab.

COATUE MANAGEMENT
Several changes in billionaire Philippe Laffont's Coatue Management's portfolio were around big AI names.

The firm reduced its holdings in AI industry bellwether Nvidia by 14.1% to 9.9 million shares, joining some other high-profile firms such as Bridgewater and Michael Burry's Scion Asset Management which have reduced their exposure to the company. Earlier this week, Burry said he would close his hedge fund after warning of an AI bubble in the markets.

The firm also reduced its exposure to tech stocks Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab, Amazon, CoreWeave (CRWV.O), opens new tab and Arm Holdings by 15.1%, 13.9%, 62.2% and 51.2%, respectively, while exiting its positions in Eli Lilly and tobacco giant Philip Morris (PM.N), opens new tab. However, Coatue upped its stakes in other Big Tech names such as Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Meta, and increased exposure to e-commerce giant Alibaba .

Reporting by Anirban Sen in New York; Editing by Megan Davies and Leslie Adler

CrunchBase : The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: AI And Defense Tech Take The

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: AI And Defense Tech Take The Lead

The largest rounds this week went to AI and defense tech companies, amid a generally busy period for big financings. Coding automation platform Cursor and parent company Anysphere led by a long shot, closing on a $2.3 billion Series D. The next-largest round was a $510 million financing for defense tech company Chaos Industries, followed by financings in sectors including AI inference, e-commerce and electric vehicles.

1. Anysphere, $2.3B, AI coding: Coding automation platform Cursor and parent company Anysphere raised $2.3 billion in a Series D financing backed by Accel, Thrive Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, DST Global, Coatue, Nvidia and Google. The round set a $29.3 billion post-money valuation for the San Francisco-headquartered company, which is more than 3x higher than what it secured just six months ago.

2. Chaos Industries, $510M, defense tech: Chaos Industries, a defense tech startup focused on counter-drone radar and communication systems, announced that it secured $510 million in new funding led by Valor Equity Partners. The round sets a $4.5 billion valuation for the 3-year-old, Los Angeles-based company.

3. D-Matrix, $275M, AI infrastructure: Santa Clara, California-based D-Matrix, a developer of generative AI inference compute for data centers, closed on $275 million in Series C funding. Bullhound Capital, Triatomic Capital and Temasek led the round, which sets a $2 billion valuation for the 6-year-old company.

4. Gopuff, $250M, fast delivery: Philadelphia-based Gopuff, which offers fast delivery of groceries and other products, picked up $250 million in new funding led by Eldridge Industries and Valor Equity Partners. Founded in 2013, Gopuff has raised $3.7 billion in known funding to date, per Crunchbase data.

5. Forterra, $238M, defense tech: Clarksburg, Maryland-based Forterra, a developer of autonomous systems for the defense sector, closed on $238 million in Series C equity and debt funding. Moore Strategic Ventures led the financing.

6. Skims, $225M, apparel: Skims, the Kim Kardashian-founded shapewear and clothing brand, landed $225 million in new financing led by Goldman Sachs. The round sets a $5 billion valuation for the 6-year-old, Los Angeles-based company.

7. Genspark, $200M, AI tools: AI agent builder Genspark raised $200 million in a financing led by SBI Investment and LG Technology Ventures. Per Crunchbase data, the round brings total funding to date to $360 million for the Palo Alto, California-based company, which was founded in 2023.

8. Harbinger, $160M, electric vehicles: Garden Grove, California-based Harbinger, a maker of medium-duty electric and hybrid vehicles, secured $160 million in a Series C round led by FedEx, Capricorn Investment Group, and recreational vehicle manufacturer Thor Industries. Along with its investment, FedEx placed an initial order for 53 Harbinger EVs, the company says.

9. TeraDAR, $150M, sensors: TeraDAR, a developer of terahertz technology to be used in sensors for automotive, defense and other industries, closed on $150 million in a Series B round. VXI Capital led the financing for the Boston-based company.

10. Alembic, $145M, AI marketing tools: Alembic, a startup that provides AI-enabled data analytics for marketing, picked up $145 million in a fundraising round led by Prysm Capital and Accenture. The round values the San Francisco-based company at $645 million.

WSJ : Berkshire Added $4 Billion Alphabet Stake and Further Pared Apple Stock

Berkshire Added $4 Billion Alphabet Stake and Further Pared Apple Stock
Warren Buffett’s conglomerate was a net seller of stocks during the third quarter, but did add a position in Google’s parent company

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway added Google parent company, Alphabet GOOGL -0.78%decrease; red down pointing triangle, to its portfolio during the third quarter and further shrunk its stake in Apple.

The Omaha, Neb., company disclosed its stockholdings in a regulatory filing Friday afternoon. Shares of Alphabet gained 1.9% in after-hours trading.

Berkshire sold $12.5 billion of equity securities during the September quarter, while buying $6.4 billion, marking its 12th consecutive quarter as a net seller of stocks. And for the fifth-straight period, the company refrained from repurchasing its own shares.

Friday’s filing came as Berkshire investors and observers begin to count down the final days of Buffett’s long run as chief executive and top investor. He plans to hand over the reins to his handpicked successor, Greg Abel, at the end of the year.

Abel will assume command over one of America’s most unusual companies: a large amalgam of businesses ranging from insurance to railroads to candy, along with a sizable investment portfolio that includes the shares of many of the other companies Buffett has long admired.

Buffett wrote in a Thanksgiving letter released Monday that he thinks Abel is “a great manager, a tireless worker and an honest communicator.” Buffett said he plans to keep a significant portion of his Class A shares until shareholders grow comfortable with Abel, and that he will continue writing to shareholders through a yearly Thanksgiving message.


Berkshire purchased 17.8 million shares of Alphabet during the third quarter, according to the filing. The shares were valued at more than $4.3 billion at the end of September. Alphabet recently reported a 16% surge in third-quarter revenue, and like other leading tech companies, is funneling billions of dollars into artificial-intelligence development.

Steven Check, chief investment officer of Check Capital Management and a Berkshire shareholder, says the company might have bought Alphabet’s stock in part because it is one of the cheaper “Magnificent Seven” Big Tech shares. His firm also owns Alphabet shares, with the Google-parent being its second-largest holding behind only its Berkshire position.

“It’s not surprising that’d be the one that they would buy,” Check said.

Apple shares recently traded at about 33 times its projected earnings over the next 12 months, according to FactSet. In comparison, Alphabet recently traded at a multiple of 25 times.

Berkshire sold 41.8 million shares of Apple, marking the second straight quarter the company has reduced its stake in the iPhone maker. The stock was little changed in late trading after the disclosure.

News Corp, owner of The Wall Street Journal, has a commercial agreement to supply news through Apple services.

American Express, Apple, Bank of America, Coca-Cola and Chevron remained Berkshire’s largest holdings.

Berkshire also reduced its position in Bank of America and shed all of its D.R. Horton shares. The company increased its stakes in Chubb, Domino’s Pizza, Sirius XM Holdings and Lennar. Berkshire left its positions unchanged in Amazon.com and UnitedHealth, the beleaguered health insurer.

Berkshire Class B shares have gained about 12% this year, below the S&P 500’s around 14% climb.

Institutional investors managing at least $100 million in U.S. stocks and certain other equities must disclose their holdings at the end of each quarter in Form 13F filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Form 13Fs provide an outdated look at stock portfolios, since investors have 45 days to submit the filings. Still, Berkshire’s disclosures are widely parsed by market participants seeking insight into the decisions made by the company’s investing deputies.

WSJ : Tesla Requires Suppliers to Avoid Made-in-China Parts for U.S. Cars

Tesla Requires Suppliers to Avoid Made-in-China Parts for U.S. Cars
Tariffs, geopolitical risks push EV maker to accelerate supply-chain strategy to reduce China reliance

  • Tesla requires suppliers to exclude China-made components for its U.S.-manufactured cars due to geopolitical tensions.
  • Tesla aims to switch all components to non-China sources within one to two years for its U.S. cars.
  • Tesla has been trying to reduce reliance on China-made components for U.S. cars since the Covid-19 pandemic and accelerated this effort this year after U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods.

BEIJING—Tesla TSLA 0.59%increase; green up pointing triangle is now requiring its suppliers to exclude China-made components in the manufacturing of its cars in the U.S., a fresh example of the fallout from deepening geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China.

Earlier this year, the electric-vehicle maker decided that it would stop using China-based suppliers for Tesla cars that are made in the U.S., according to people familiar with the situation. Tesla and its suppliers have already replaced some China-made components with parts made elsewhere. Tesla is aiming to switch all other components to those made outside of China in the next year or two, some of the people said.

Tesla has been trying to reduce its dependence on China-made components for its U.S. cars since the Covid-19 pandemic disrupted the flow of goods from China, encouraging its China-based suppliers to make components elsewhere including in Mexico. But this year, after President Trump imposed stiff tariffs on Chinese imports, the company accelerated the strategy to cut out Chinese parts, the people said.

China is a major producer and exporter of auto parts—including chips and batteries—and materials that go inside cars. Many of them are cheaper due to China’s huge production scale, lower costs and weak currency.

Tesla executives have been grappling with the uncertainty brought by fluctuating tariff levels in the U.S.-China trade battle, which has made it difficult for the carmaker to formulate a coherent pricing strategy, some of the people said.

The geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing and the fallout on the global auto supply chain have only intensified Tesla’s urgency in pursuing the China-free strategy. In recent weeks, fresh disruptions in the supply of automotive chips stemming from a spat between China and the Netherlands have triggered discussions at Tesla about the need to accelerate diversification, some of the people said.

Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Tesla’s strategy is the latest example of how trade and geopolitical tensions are driving a decoupling of the world’s two largest economies and increasingly redrawing global supply chains. Many American companies are seeking to exclude China-made components or manufacture outside of China when it comes to products for the U.S. market. In turn, Chinese technology companies are erasing American components and technology from their supply chains.

The auto industry has been hit particularly hard by China-U.S. friction because of the global nature of its supply chains and business. This spring, automakers were rattled after China imposed export restrictions on certain rare earths and magnets that are widely used in cars and their production. More recently, carmakers have struggled to secure chips after China blocked the export of semiconductors made by a firm called Nexperia that are used in car lights and electronics.

Nexperia is a Dutch company whose chips are largely manufactured in Europe but ultimately are exported to the world from China, where processing and packaging take place. China blocked the export of the chips after the Dutch government seized control of Nexperia from its Chinese parent, which is on a U.S. trade blacklist.

The Dutch and Chinese governments are still fighting over the issue, even though Beijing has allowed Nexperia chips to be shipped out to some overseas customers following a summit last month between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

The U.S. is Tesla’s biggest market, and Tesla vehicles running on American roads are produced at the carmaker’s factories in the U.S. In China, Tesla produces cars at its Shanghai plant using mostly locally produced components. The Shanghai-made cars are shipped both within China and overseas, mostly to Asia and Europe, but not to the U.S.

Over the years, Chinese suppliers that Tesla has been working with in China have increasingly been shipping parts globally for the carmaker’s factories elsewhere. A China-based executive said earlier this year that the Shanghai factory had some 400 direct Chinese suppliers, more than 60 of which had supplied Tesla’s global production.

Tesla has been pursuing a strategy of cutting back on made-in-China components for its U.S. cars since Trump’s first administration. As a part of this approach, Tesla has worked with its Chinese suppliers—including those making seat covers and metal casings—to set up factories and warehouses in Mexico and Southeast Asia in recent years, people familiar with the project said.

One Chinese-made component that Tesla is struggling to substitute is the lithium-iron phosphate battery. China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology, or CATL, has been a major supplier to Tesla for the battery, known as LFP.

Until last year, Tesla was selling cars in the U.S. with Chinese-produced LFP batteries, but since then it stopped doing so, because they became ineligible for EV-related tax credits and also due to U.S. tariffs.

Tesla is working to build LFP batteries for energy-storage products in the U.S. In October, the company said it expected its facility in Nevada making such battery products to start running in the first quarter of 2026.

Tesla Chief Financial Officer Vaibhav Taneja said in April that the company was working on manufacturing LFP cells in the U.S., and on “securing additional supply chain from non-China-based suppliers.”

“But it will take time,” he said.

WWD : Creative Directors Come and Go, but Dior’s Holiday Windows Are Timeless

Creative Directors Come and Go, but Dior’s Holiday Windows Are Timeless
The French brand is bringing "Dior's Enchanted World" to life with topiary beasts, colorful flowers and a giant gingerbread tree.

PARIS — “C’est magique!”

So declared a female passerby, moments after Dior chairman and chief executive officer Delphine Arnault and “Call My Agent!” star Camille Cottin unveiled the holiday decorations at the French luxury brand’s historic flagship in Paris.

The event on Friday night kicked off global celebrations focused on house icons showcased in a short film called “Dior’s Enchanted World.”

The holiday campaign reprises key visual elements of Maria Grazia Chiuri’s cruise collection. In her final show as creative director of the house, models wearing white and gold goddess gowns and black lace masks paraded through the fog-shrouded gardens of Rome’s Villa Albani Torlonia after dark.

That mood is echoed in the film, which is set at night in a maze that houses five universes, including “The Runway of Curiosities,” home to Roman statues, a fortune teller and topiary creatures studded with fairy lights, including swans and a winged horse.

Dior this week dropped the cruise line alongside seasonal items such as a Lady Dior bag in white leather with metallic gold stitching, and new versions of its popular Dior Toujours and D-Journey bags in gold crackled leather.


Customers hoping to snag items from new designer Jonathan Anderson’s debut men’s and women’s collections for Dior will have to wait until Jan. 2, when the first items are set to reach store shelves worldwide.
Underscoring continuity amid the recent changes in creative direction, the core elements of the holiday decorations — being deployed in locations spanning from Beverly Hills to Beijing — can be traced to founder Christian Dior and his fondness for talismans like stars, flowers and butterflies.


The illuminated facade of the Paris store at 30 Avenue Montaigne reprises elements of the spectacular Carousel of Dreams installation that Dior created for Saks Fifth Avenue in New York City in 2023. At its center is a 30-foot ferris wheel with twirling elements including a sun and moon, and 28 mechanical butterflies with beating wings flitting among colorful flowers.

“We want to spark a sense of wonder in our customers,” said Arnault as a gospel choir performed on the curved central staircase of the store, next to a Christmas tree festooned with oversize gold decorations shaped like Bar jackets and Junon dresses.

“It’s the magic of Christmas,” she said. “Monsieur Dior’s creations are the soul of our house. He founded Dior right here at 30 Avenue Montaigne, and his presence is still very much felt in these walls.”

Come One, Come All
In a nod to the founder’s love for astrology, the Zodiac signs of Dior, his sister Catherine and of Anderson have been incorporated into the facade design, Arnault revealed. “The wheel on our facade is such a meaningful symbol, and thanks to our location — right at the intersection of Avenue Montaigne and Rue François 1er — it’s incredibly visible,” she noted.
The holiday decorations at the House of Dior in New York City.
Courtesy of Dior
Olivier Bialobos, Dior’s deputy managing director in charge of global communication and image, said while he doesn’t know exactly how many people saw the holiday décor last year, it definitely made an impression.

“One day, I got into a taxi and the driver told me, ‘Right now, the Dior facade is the most popular attraction in Paris after the Eiffel Tower,’ so I took that as a great compliment,” he said.

“At this point in time, we need to do absolutely everything in our power to make people dream,” he added. “What I love is that when you walk past a facade like the one we’re unveiling tonight, it speaks to everyone: children, older people, women, men. It’s truly for all.”

The store’s window displays play with scale, toggling between a giant gilded butterfly and pint-sized elements, including a dollhouse with shadow figures evoking seamstresses in the haute couture workshop, and a replica salon where high jewelry nestles on miniature furniture overgrown with moss.

In the store’s winter garden, rows of fir trees are decorated with gilded emblems, some in the shape of Dior’s dog Bobby, while a large Pegasus statue lights up the indoor garden of its atrium café Le Jardin.
The Dior limited-edition Christmas log cake by Yannick Alléno.
Lara Giliberto/Courtesy of Dior
Bialobos said he dreams of one day producing Dior-themed Christmas tree baubles for sale. “I’ve been trying to make it happen for years, but I haven’t been able to find a supplier who can produce it to the right scale and at a reasonable cost,” he said.

Yannick Alléno, who in September succeeded Jean Imbert as the chef in residence at the Avenue Montaigne flagship, has created his first limited-edition Christmas log cake for the house. Inspired by the Francis Poulenc dress designed by Dior in 1950, it’s available beginning Dec. 15 exclusively and by reservation at Le Jardin.


Bialobos said the chef got the idea after visiting the Dior archives. “When I first saw the sketches, I thought, ‘Yes, this could work.’ But when I saw the end result, I was absolutely blown away,” he said.

A Moveable Feast
It’s the second year in a row that Dior has repurposed elements from its Saks extravaganza, highlighting the importance of the core Dior codes. Elements of the décor have also been used in the Beverly Hills store, and will travel to the House of Dior flagship due to open in Beijing on Dec. 11.

At the Dubai Mall, a gingerbread tree more than 32 feet tall will go up on Dec. 10, echoing the brand’s blockbuster Christmas-time takeover of Harrods in London in 2022. The gingerbread theme has also been reprised at the recently inaugurated Dior boutique in New York City.

In tandem, the house has created virtual experiences at its boutiques worldwide, with QR codes in its windows revealing highlights of Dior’s history through interactive stars. Selfie filters surround faces with a constellation of stars or animated cookies, while at 30 Montaigne, an AR feature sets the illuminated ferris wheel in motion.

“What we’re trying to do now is give our major flagships, or recently opened stores, a slightly unique, distinctive décor, and rotate them. Some people might have seen the gingerbread theme at Harrods on social media, but our customers in Dubai are not familiar with it,” Bialobos said. “Every time we bring these concepts to a new destination, it’s a huge success.”


Holiday decorations at Dior Gold House in Bangkok.
Courtesy of Dior
This tailor-made approach has temporarily replaced the idea of massive store takeovers. “Maybe one day we’ll return to other department stores like Galeries Lafayette, where we’ve done it in the past,” Bialobos said.

In the meantime, the baroque bestiary of the “Enchanted World” has taken up residence indoors and outdoors at Dior stores including its temporary locations in Bangkok and Seoul, while the pristine white facade of its flagship in Seoul, designed by Christian de Portzamparc, has been customized with a temporary gold stencil of its Dioresque Stella motif.

The design, by Italian artist Pietro Ruffo, also features on the brand’s holiday packaging and its new home collection, alongside the Dioresque Butterfly pattern. Popular for holiday gifting, tableware this season includes new Dior Cristal goblets and candleholders, available beginning Nov. 19.

Ruffo also worked on the packaging for the “Dior’s Circus of Dreams” holiday beauty campaign starring Anya Taylor-Joy and Deva Cassel. Given his close association with Chiuri, the brand’s visual language will likely be overhauled next year.

“It will definitely evolve, but the codes themselves remain the same. And I’m sure Jonathan Anderson, with his creativity and his sense of humor, is already eager to dive into Christmas. Next year, he’ll come with a bunch of ideas — as he always does — to challenge the teams and celebrate the season in his own way, with the Dior codes,” Bialobos said.
Dior Maison tableware featuring Pietro Ruffo’s Dioresque Butterfly motif.

FT : Porsche ‘Ferrarification’ push backfires with $300mn US lawsuit

Porsche ‘Ferrarification’ push backfires with $300mn US lawsuit
Incoming CEO faces suit from key Florida distributor alleging carmaker withheld cars after refusal to build exclusive showroom

Porsche has been drawn into a $300mn lawsuit with a leading US luxury car dealer as the German carmaker struggles to readjust its pricing strategy following aggressive increases in the wake of the pandemic.

The lawsuit, originally filed in 2022 by Florida dealership The Collection, alleged that Porsche in North America resorted to “strong-arm” tactics and withheld allocation of cars after it refused to build a standalone Porsche showroom.

German parent group Porsche AG had tried several times to recuse itself from the case as a foreign entity but a Miami judge recently dismissed its request, setting the stage for a trial next March shortly after former McLaren boss Michael Leiters is set to take over as its new chief executive.

Porsche and its two subsidiaries have denied allegations that their conduct violated Florida’s dealer franchise law and pushed The Collection’s sales into “a death spiral” as the dealer has claimed in its filing to the Florida court.

But the lawsuit in one of the hottest locations for luxury brands in America has shed an uncomfortable spotlight on Porsche’s relationship with powerful US dealers. It comes at a time when the German carmaker contends with weak vehicle sales across its core markets and a costly reversal of its ambitious EV policy. 

“This litigation is about the relations between dealers, their distributors and manufacturers certainly throughout the state of Florida but because much of America has similar regulations at issue, the litigation implicates the industry throughout the country,” said Sean Burstyn, founder of Burstyn Law in Miami, who represents The Collection. 

Three years ago when The Collection sued Porsche’s subsidiaries for $300mn in damages, the luxury car landscape was vastly different.

Coming out of the Covid-19 chip shortage, Porsche, like its rivals, was able to raise its prices aggressively since its vehicles were often pre-sold before dealers received them owing to pent-up demand for scarce units. 

In a trend that some buyers had dubbed “the Ferrarification of Porsche”, the German carmaker tried to become a super luxury brand like Ferrari by pushing up its prices.

“Porsche, coming out of Covid, pushed pricing really, really hard and they just kept driving the price up on everything,” said Scott Sherwood, an independent analyst of luxury car brands. “If you’re looking to create loyalty and repeat customers, that’s not how you do it.” 

The price increases were also accelerated by a lack of pricing discipline among its dealers. Unlike Ferrari, whose dealers are incentivised to sell at the manufacturer’s suggested retail price, Porsche’s distributors had more freedom to sell some of its vehicles at far above the carmaker’s recommended price. This in turn meant that there was a wide variation in retail prices across dealerships.

In its complaint, The Collection said that by May 2022, Porsche gave “considerable attention” to dealers charging well in excess of the suggested price for its vehicles. 

In recent years, Porsche sought to extend its influence over the US sales network, encouraging dealers to create exclusive showrooms for its brand, according to analysts.

The Collection, which also represents other brands such as Ferrari, McLaren and Aston Martin, was asked to invest tens of millions of dollars to build facilities selling only Porsche vehicles — a move meant to bolster the luxury experience for customers.

A top dealer for Porsche vehicles in the US for several decades, The Collection accused the German carmaker of withholding the cars after it refused to build the facility, claiming that such tactics may have been used to “nix” dealers so it could sell directly to consumers. 

In its defence filing this month, Porsche denied the allegations and argued that The Collection had been suffering from falling sales for almost a decade.

The dealer would not have suffered any lost profits if it had “timely built a compliant Porsche dealership facility”, it said, adding that “The Collection intentionally decided not to invest in a new exclusive Porsche facility, despite experiencing declining sales of new Porsche-brand vehicles for nearly a decade”.

Porsche Cars North America declined to comment on the pending trial. Regarding its pricing strategy, it said all of its 204 franchised dealers in the US were independently owned and operated.

It added that Porsche had ranked at the top in terms of sales satisfaction and customer loyalty in 2025 surveys conducted in the US by JD Power, a consumer analytics company.

Conflicts between manufacturers and dealers in the US market were “inevitable”, said Arthur Kipferler of Berylls by AlixPartners. Demands from brands were likely to run up against resistance from dealers, who have an interest in protecting their own bottom line, he said. 

The greenlight for the trial comes as analysts are increasingly critical of Porsche’s efforts to emulate Ferrari’s pricing. While the Italian carmaker thrives by controlling vehicle volumes — totalling just 14,000 a year — to create scarcity and pricing power, Porsche with its annual sales of over 310,000 did not have the same kind of exclusivity. 

The company is also under intense pressure to boost sales as it invested heavily to develop new electric cars, while it halted production of petrol or hybrid successors for its best-selling Macan and Cayman models — a decision that has now backfired and cost Porsche billions of euros to reverse.

With vehicle sales in the first nine months of the year down by 6 per cent in North America alongside a 25 per cent fall in China and 16 per cent decline in Germany, Porsche needs its US dealers more than ever.

Local dealers in the US were “indispensable” for Porsche to support its sales performance, “especially in a period of slowing demand”, said Stefan Reindl, director of the Institute of Automotive Industry in Germany.

As Leiters seeks to turn Porsche’s fortunes around, the incoming CEO cannot afford to be further entangled in a high-profile lawsuit in Florida, warned analysts.

The litigation would be an additional challenge to the complexities already created by Donald Trump’s higher tariffs on foreign-made cars. The company has raised the prices of new models across all regions and it has indicated to investors of additional price increases in the coming months.

“When Leiters comes in, if he’s smart, he’ll get this resolved quickly and then move on,” Sherwood said.

Barron's : Europe Is Spending Big on Defense. Rheinmetall Benefits.

Europe Is Spending Big on Defense. Rheinmetall Benefits.

Germany-based defense company Rheinmetall’s stock has soared over the past few years and appears pricey. At the same time, investors seem to be optimistic for a further rally over the next 12 months.

“Germany is the linchpin to Europe’s rearmament,” says Otto Svendsen, an associate fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Düsseldorf-based Rheinmetall, which has a market cap of around 78 billion euros ($90 billion), plays a key role in delivering the munitions materiel and other defense equipment.

Despite being the largest economy in Europe and enjoying years of massive budget surplus, Germany didn’t fulfill its NATO commitment of spending of at least 2% of GDP a year from 1992 through 2023, according to World Bank data.

Since the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Europe has played catch-up on an epic scale, with military spending estimated at a total of €800 billion from 2025 through 2028.

That promise of more rearmament spending is reflected in Rheinmetall’s share price.

The stock delivered returns of 183% so far this year through Nov. 11, according to Morningstar data. Morningstar also forecasts the stock rallying from its recent price of €1,750 a share to a fair value of €2,220, a 27% increase, excluding dividends. That is more or less in line with the consensus target price of €2,174 within 12 months.

“We’ve seen an increased demand for ammunition across the globe, and there are no signs that will slow,” says Ben Kesling, the business development leader at Chariot Defense, a Silicon Valley–based defense company, and a former U.S. Marine infantry officer. “They will constantly be producing those items.” That’s because bullets, bombs, missiles, rockets, and the like typically don’t get used twice.

“NATO isn’t the only defense customer,” Kesling says. European Union members of Permanent Structured Cooperation, or Pesco, which collaborate on defense, are also involved in defense planning. The U.S. isn’t involved, he says. In addition to demand from NATO and Pesco for war-fighting necessities, there is also demand for defense materiel in North Africa.

While Rheinmetall’s price rally is impressive, the stock is trading at an exceptionally high price/earnings ratio of 92. That’s way above the recent 37 P/E ratio for the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite index, which some experts say is unsustainable.

In some ways, Rheinmetall isn’t like most stocks. Most defense companies respond to government military spending, but it’s also true that governments tend to move slowly. “Defense budgets often come along after the demand is identified, Kesling says. “And it takes a while to get manufacturers to come fully operating.” Remember, until relatively recently, the EU hadn’t produced the vast quantities of war materiel for a long time.

There are some likely challenges for any defense company operating in Europe. Each country—and there are 27 in the EU—has its own idea of what defense equipment to buy, Svendsen says.

Additionally, the estimated increase in military spending may not materialize. “We should keep our eyes on the extent to which these spending announcements are realized,” Svendsen says. In other words, if the big ramp-up in Europe’s military spending doesn’t come to pass, then profits probably won’t be as big as expected.

There are risks to investing in Rheinmetall. Governments might not be able to spend as much as they expect. For instance, a significant economic slump in the countries where Rheinmetall’s customers are based may lead to tightened defense budgets. Peace could also break out, making military spending less important. But that seems doubtful.

On balance, taking a risk on the stock seems like a good bet.

Barron's : Concierge Medicine Is Booming. Should You Join the VIP Club?

Concierge Medicine Is Booming. Should You Join the VIP Club?
The membership clubs charge annual fees for access to doctors, extra testing, and perks like an Oura ring. Are they worth the cost?

Key Points
  • Concierge medicine, a healthcare model charging annual fees for personalized services, is growing by 4% to 7% annually, with 10,000 to 14,000 U.S. physicians now in such practices.
  • Annual fees for concierge practices range from $1,000 to $40,000 for services like extended doctor visits, preventive screenings, and specialist referrals.
  • While concierge medicine offers personalized care, studies show it increases health spending by 30% to 50% for patients without a corresponding increase in longevity, and may exacerbate doctor shortages and health disparities.

ennifer Timmons is no ordinary family doctor. At her practice in Los Angeles, she sees fewer than 50 patients a year, largely by Zoom or at their homes. If they need to reach her after hours, they have her cellphone number. If they want nutrition advice, wellness coaching, or help with complex medical issues, she’s at their beck and call.

For access to Dr. Timmons, patients pay $40,000 a year. That puts her in rarefied territory for a family doctor—most of whom are so harried they barely know their patients individually.

Yet Timmons is a “concierge” doctor, available only to patients who pay an annual membership fee. While she’s at the high end of the field, concierge medicine is thriving—appealing both to doctors and consumers as an antidote to America’s strained medical system.

Concierge practices are like the VIP clubs of healthcare. Charging annual fees, the practices have limited numbers of patients, more personalized services, and doctors who may handle everything from your annual physical to coordinating cancer treatment.

Major hospital groups like Johns Hopkins Medicine and Mount Sinai now have concierge practices. MedStar Health, a big system in the Washington, D.C., area, recently launched a Signature concierge practice.

Republican health policies are favoring concierge practices, including a new tax break in their “big beautiful” law. Starting next year, patients in some direct primary-care practices can use their health savings accounts to pay membership fees, up to $150 a month for an individual and $300 for a family.

For medical practices and hospitals, it makes good business sense. The idea is to create new revenue, turning healthcare into Netflix-like subscription streams. An estimated 10,000 to 14,000 doctors, or fewer than 2% of all U.S. physicians, are now in concierge groups, according to trade publication Concierge Medicine Today. The publication estimates growth of between 4% to 7% a year in the industry.

For patients, concierge medicine offers a cocoon from mounting pressures on the medical system. The federal government, under Republican control, is orchestrating broad cuts to health spending that are likely to affect millions of people once they take full effect in a couple of years. As they course through, they’ll hit a system already struggling with high costs, labor shortages, and other challenges.

Republicans’ more than $900 billion in Medicaid cuts will lead to 7.5 million people losing their health insurance by 2034, according to estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Republicans’ reluctance to extend the extra premium subsidies for “Obamacare” insurance plans—the issue at the heart of the government shutdown—would also mean a loss of coverage for millions of Americans.

The fallout, analysts say, will extend beyond Medicaid and Obamacare patients. Hospitals may be forced to reduce services and staffing due to higher costs for uncompensated care, according to KFF, a nonprofit health research organization. Rural hospitals and practices face perhaps the most pressure.

Concierge medicine offers some insulation for consumers who can afford the annual fees. Whether it’s worth the cost depends on your financial situation and how much you’re willing to spend for premium service. While some studies have found that concierge care improves patients’ health, others suggest that it doesn’t extend patients’ lives even as it raises costs for the U.S. medical system.

Here’s a look at how it works, and some guidelines to consider as more patients and doctors join the concierge crowd.

Premium Healthcare
Concierge medicine dates back to the 1990s, when physicians—sick of insurance hassles and seeing too many patients—started offering their services through club-like membership models.

Annual fees range from around $1,000 to $40,000. The fee typically covers a yearly physical and access to the group’s physicians and other health professionals. Insurance coverage varies; some practices include additional testing that insurance typically doesn’t cover. Some high-end providers, like Timmons, don’t take any insurance.

Many concierge practices promote preventive medicine as a membership benefit. At MDVIP, a nationwide network of more than 1,400 concierge doctors, patients are typically screened for grip strength and gait speed, metrics of well-being that insurers typically don’t cover.

Specialist referrals are another perk. MDVIP, for example, connects patients with top medical centers like the Mayo and Cleveland clinics. Patients must pay for their treatment with insurance or out-of-pocket costs, but referrals smooth their way.

Physicians say they can provide better care in smaller practices. Doctors in traditional practices have just 10 to 15 minutes per patient visit and spend hours each week on insurance paperwork. In a concierge practice, physicians can act more like the family doctors of old—finding specialists, following up with other physicians, even seeing a patient in the hospital and advocating for them.

The personalized touch has largely vanished outside the concierge world. Insurance companies don’t pay primary-care doctors to see patients in hospital; doctors might not know if a patient is laid up with a broken hip or beginning cancer treatment. Many hospitals employ “hospitalists,” a category of physician who checks in on patients they have no history with.

Timmons says she started her concierge practice in 2022 after burning out as a traditional family doctor. “I was over it,” she says. “I was putting Band-Aids on problems.”

Now she sells her undivided attention and willingness to work her connections to get specialist appointments. Often, she’ll pick up the phone if a client needs, say, a cardiologist. She also conducts research for patients—from cancer treatment to skin care—and dispenses advice that other doctors might not; a patient recently texted to ask if the foundation makeup she was considering was “clean beauty.” (The verdict: It wasn’t, so Timmons recommended an alternative.)

In MedStar’s Signature concierge service, the $7,500 yearly membership includes perks like an Oura “smart ring” to track health data, and access to a nutritionist and athletic trainer. Patients are given the cellphone number of the group’s physician, Dr. Merlene Horan, who previously served as a physician in the White House.

Some patients say the fees are worth it. Bert Gutierrez, 75, turned to his concierge practice, Sollis Health, when a urologist he contacted had a wait time of over a month. Sollis got him an appointment with another urologist the next day.

Now, when he gets painful kidney stones, Gutierrez avoids the overcrowded and chaotic emergency room and heads to Sollis’ serene facility on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. “At my age, I think the time, attention—you deserve that,” Gutierrez says. “Concierge medicine offers a better way to manage your health.” Sollis’ fees start at $333 a month.

Clark Bellin, a financial advisor in Lincoln, Neb., says he would consider a concierge practice for his 86-year-old father, who has mild dementia and is losing his hearing. He wants a doctor to take more ownership over his father’s care.

“It just seems like the quarterback is gone,” says Bellin, who often spends hours arranging visits with specialists and coordinating care across hospitals that don’t talk to each other.

Going Overboard?
While patients may not mind if doctors amp up the tests and use high-tech diagnostics, there’s a fine line between doing enough for patients and doing too much.

Dr. Lisa A. Cooper, Bloomberg distinguished professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, did a stint at a concierge practice that offered executive physicals. She left partly because she was ordering a lot of tests that seemed like overkill. “To me, it was an unnecessary use of resources,” Cooper says.

Case in point: the full-body scan touted by celebrities like Kim Kardashian. The scans cost around $2,500 and generally aren’t paid for by insurance. Companies selling the scans promote them as a means of early detection, but the American College of Radiology says there’s insufficient evidence to recommend total body screening for patients with no clinical symptoms, risk factors, or family history.

Dr. Andrea Klemes, MDVIP’s chief medical officer, got a full body scan that turned up a “laundry list” of harmless things, like a cyst in her brain. Ordinary patients who receive such results may get sucked into needless and costly follow-up testing, she says. MDVIP focuses on tests that are “clinically actionable” in its annual wellness program; patients who want additional testing, including scans, can discuss that with their provider, Klemes says.

Timmons still recommends the scans. While they can issue false positives, she says, they occasionally reveal lifesaving findings like an aneurysm in one of her patients, which needed treating. “It’s a risk/benefit analysis that has to be made on a case-by-case basis,” she says.

Other tests offered by concierge practices have more backing by medical research. Spotting cardiac inflammation through a specialized test, for instance, can reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke, according to a peer-reviewed study in the Journal of International Medical Research, using data from 286,000 MDVIP patients.

Will Concierge Medicine Help You Live Longer?
Proponents argue that highly personalized medicine is worth the cost in terms of preventing and managing disease. A peer-reviewed study found that Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MDVIP practices experienced a statistically significant decrease in heart attack and strokes compared with those not in MDVIP practices.

But the kinds of people who can afford concierge practices tend to be wealthier, which is positively correlated to health. The study used ZIP Code data to control for the influence of wealth, but it isn’t a perfect proxy.

A 2023 study in the Journal of Health Economics, using similar methodologies, found that while concierge medicine enrollment corresponded with a 30% to 50% increase in health spending for patients, there was with no change to their longevity, on average. The study also found that wealthier people tend to gravitate toward concierge practices more than sick people—and they enter with lifelong health advantages.

Indeed, if there’s a downside to concierge medicine, it may be societal: higher spending lavished on a privileged minority, fewer physicians for everyone else, and longer waits to see specialists.

For her part, Timmons knows she’s restricting her services to the ultrarich, so she puts free wellness content on social media.

Doctor shortages have long been a problem, especially in rural areas, and the U.S. will be short some 86,000 doctors by 2036, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. Medicaid cuts and other strains on the system may push more doctors to join concierge practices.

“You can definitely say it’s worsening the shortage in certain areas,” Cooper says. If you live in an area without enough doctors and some of those doctors put up gates around their practice, that puts them out of reach for patients who can’t afford to follow.

Cooper thinks the profession is due for a reckoning as concierge practices siphon more doctors and deepen health disparities. “To me, it calls for a broader conversation in our profession about what this means,” she says. “I don’t think we’re having these conversations yet.”

Barron's : AI Data Centers Need More Power Right Now. These Companies Can Delive

AI Data Centers Need More Power Right Now. These Companies Can Deliver It.
A new group of players in the AI power race are posting huge stocks gains. Their futures look bright.

Key Points
  • A new group of companies, including Caterpillar and Cummins, are benefiting from the urgent need for on-site power solutions for data centers.
  • The shift is driven by tech companies’ need for rapid power access and political pressure to reduce data centers’ reliance on the main grid.
  • Companies like Bloom Energy, Liberty Energy, and Pro Petro are repurposing existing technologies or offering fuel cells to provide quick, localized power for data centers.

or more than a year, a handful of companies have racked up huge stock gains by riding the hottest theme in energy investing—artificial intelligence power demand. They are the owners of power plants that send electrons to the grid, such as Constellation Energy, Vistra, and Talen Energy, and the manufacturers of big turbines that generate electricity, like GE Vernova and Siemens Energy.

Those companies are still bound to benefit from AI demand. But their stocks are starting to flatten out or fall, a sign investors have begun to look elsewhere. The stocks of a new group of firms have lately been surging and could take a more central role as the AI race takes shape. They include companies not usually associated with electricity generation, including construction giant Caterpillar; engine maker Cummins; oil services firms Baker Hughes, Liberty Energy, and ProPetro Holding; and alternative-energy company Bloom Energy.

The shift is being driven by two main factors: a need for speed and a change in the politics of electricity.

The speed angle is self-evident. Tech companies need to get their data centers plugged in today, or risk being stuck with expensive Nvidia chips that aren’t connected to electricity. The biggest challenge for Microsoft now is getting access to electricity, said CEO Satya Nadella on a recent podcast. “It’s the ability to get the builds done fast enough, close to power. If you can’t do that, you may actually have a bunch of chips sitting in inventory that I can’t plug in. In fact, that is my problem today.”

At the same time, politicians in both parties have become hypersensitive to electricity inflation, which played a role in this month’s election wins by Democrats in New Jersey, Virginia, and Georgia, and looms large before next year’s midterm congressional races. In some states, data centers have been blamed for causing electricity prices to rise, because utilities need to spend money on building transmission lines and power plants to serve them. One way to alleviate that concern is for data centers to rely less on the normal electricity grid to power their sites. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, for instance, has proposed that data-center projects that can arrange for their own on-site power sources should get fast-tracked.


Such a policy—and the need for speed—plays into the hands of companies like Caterpillar, Baker Hughes, and Cummins, all of which make engines or turbines that have historically been used in other business lines. Caterpillar’s natural-gas turbines and specialized engines are used in areas like energy to pump fuels through pipelines, for instance. But they can also be repurposed to provide electricity for data centers.

Unlike big turbines made by companies like GE Vernova that can generate over 500 megawatts of power, Caterpillar’s most powerful units have 39 megawatts of capacity, and they are considered much less efficient than the state-of-the-art turbines made by bigger players. But with big turbines on back order for years, data-center players will take whatever they can get their hands on. The repurposed gear can be trucked quickly to data centers and rigged up on site.

Meta Platforms chose to use Caterpillar’s turbines at an Ohio data center that will be built so that it can operate off the electricity grid. Stargate, the massive data center project backed by OpenAI, is also using Caterpillar turbines at its Texas facility. Cummins, known for making engines for trucks and heavy machinery, is now supplying them to Digital Realty, the world’s largest data-center provider.

Caterpillar announced at its investor day on Nov. 4 that it’s doubling its production of engines and increasing its capacity to build gas turbines by 2.5 times by 2030. J.P. Morgan analyst Tami Zakaria wrote last month that Caterpillar’s power business could add at least $10 to its annual earnings per share in the next three years. Caterpillar earned $21.92 per share in 2024. Zakaria sees the stock rising to $730 from a recent $576.

Oil services companies have also been unlikely winners from this trend. Both Liberty Energy and ProPetro, best known for their expertise in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, have jumped headlong into the data- center game. They have access to turbines through their oil businesses and are planning to use them to serve tech companies. Before this, their stocks were in the dumps because of a slowdown in oil drilling. But in recent weeks, they have started inking data-center deals, and the stocks are flying.

Similar dynamics have helped Bloom Energy, which makes fuel cells that work like batteries. They can provide on-site power for all sorts of users, from data centers to industrial sites. Bloom has made deals with companies such as Oracle to deploy its fuel cells, and the stock has quintupled this year. Companies that need power quickly can simply buy Bloom’s fuel cells, which are about the size of large refrigerators, instead of waiting for permission to connect to the grid. “We are entering the age of BYOP—bring your own power,” said KR Sridhar, CEO of Bloom Energy, on the company’s earnings call. “We love this proposition.”

Enthusiasm for these new stocks has drawn attention away from some of the old winners, like GE Vernova and Vistra. Both are down by double-digits over the past month. In GE Vernova’s case, investors should consider the dip an opportunity, writes J.P. Morgan analyst Mark Strouse.

Similarly, Angie Storozynski, an analyst at Seaport Research Partners, has Buy ratings on Constellation, Vistra, and Talen, despite her concerns that they haven’t signed enough data-center deals lately. She thinks those companies still have advantages in the data-center race because they’re proven operators of baseload generation. But she expects that their advantages will erode with time. “It will not last forever,” she says. “I’m trying to be patient.”

The data-center race has entered a new stage. The clock is ticking.