>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up 

In reaction to earnings/guidance:

  • LITB +42%, TGT +8.8%, LZB +2.6% (also reinstates dividend), SUPN +2.6%, KE +2.1%, LOW +1.3%

M&A news:

  • MNTA +69.5% (to be acquired by Johnson and Johnson (JNJ) for $52.50/share)
  • HUD +48.9% (receives acquisition proposal for $7.70 per share) 

Other news:

  • DTIL +10.8% (FDA has granted Fast Track Designation to Precision for PBCAR0191 for the treatment of advanced B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • AXDX +9.5% (receives FDA EUA for COVID-19 antibody testing system)
  • ONE +8.8% (extends momentum from +29% move during Tuesday's regular session)
  • CNTG +6.1% (expands its SARS-CoV-2 testing solution to Hamburg Airport)
  • MRCY +5.5% (receives new patent for cyberattack protection technology)
  • VRNA +4.9% (initiates multiple dose part of Phase 2 clinical trial with pMDI formulation of Ensifentrine)
  • WATT +4.3% (announced a strategic partnership with Xentris Wireless to develop ruggedized products for demanding military applications using Energous' radio frequency (RF) based charging technology)
  • IRTC +2.6% (prices offering of 1,093,167 shares of its common stock at $175.00 per share (stock closed at $175.38))
  • REGN +1.7% (Regeneron Pharma and Roche's Genentech to collaborate to increase global supply of REGN-COV2)
  • UAL +1.3% (will increase service to China from two to four weekly flights)
  • MYL +1.3% (FDA approves Mylan's generic version of BIIB's Tecfidera)
  • QGEN +1% (expands coronavirus NGS and software to accelerate research for COVID-19)
  • NMRD +1% (issued a presentation outlining how CGM is being used by quarantined and hospitalised COVID-19 patients)

Analyst comments:

  • RFP +4.6% (upgraded to Outperform from Sector Perform at RBC Capital Mkts)
  • XPO +3.1% (upgraded to Overweight from Sector Weight at KeyBanc Capital Markets)
  • PFPT +2.5% (upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley)
  • GGB +1.7% (upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

  • Gapping up:
    • MNTA +68%, HUD +47.4%, LITB +30.8%, ONE +12.7%, WATT +10.2%, AXDX +6.5%, CNTG +5%, TGT +4.1%, VRNA +4%, SUPN +2.7%, GFL +2.6%, IRTC +2.6%, KE +2.1%, UAL +1.8%, REGN +1.6%, MRCY +1%, LZB +1%, QGEN +0.9%, MRK +0.7%, GS +0.6%, LOW +0.6%
  • Gapping down:
    • ALBO -15%, VIPS -12.3%, SRNE -11.7%, ATGE -10.5%, SABR -10%, PLYM -7.3%, JKHY -5.9%, GILD -5.2%, ALC -4.6%, A -1.7%, CREE -1.4%, BIIB -0.5%

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 19th of August 2020 V2(+)

>>> Up
* AB Foods Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 2,300 pence
* Covestro PT Raised to 50 euros from 45 euros at Deutsche Bank
* EQS Group PT Raised to 117 euros at Baader Helvea (+)
* Hammerson Raised to Hold at Liberum; PT 50 pence (+)
* Mayr-Melnhof PT Raised to 151 euros at Deutsche Bank

>>> Down
* Aegon Cut to Underperform at BofA; PT 2.15 euros
* Aker Solutions Cut to Neutral at Exane; PT 14.50 kroner
* Ambu Cut to Hold at ABG; PT 228 kroner
* Clariant Cut to Equal-Weight at Barclays; PT 17 Swiss francs
* TCS Group GDRs Cut to Hold at Wood & Company; PT $27.80
* Team17 Cut to Hold at Canaccord; PT 675 pence (+)

>>> Initiation
* Babcock Reinstated Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 290 pence
* CALT US Rated New Outperform at LifeSci Capital; PT $44
* Cie Financiere Rated New Buy at MainFirst; PT 153 Swiss francs

>>> Call
* Cyclicals to Lead the Uneven Earnings Rebound, Barclays Says (+)
* AB Foods Raised at RBC on Undervalued Primark, Grocery Strength
* Aegon Dividends To Be Constrained Amid Leverage Reduction: BofA (+)
* GN Store Nord Beats on Audio, Hearing Underwhelming: Jefferies (+)
* Hammerson Near-Term Covenant Risk Removed, Liberum Ups to Hold (+)
* Lundin Energy Timing of New CEO a Bit Surprising: Handelsbanken (+)
* RWE Share Sale to Back Renewables Should Be Welcomed: Analysts
* Softcat Update Shows ‘Superlative’ Performance, Jefferies Says (+)

NYT : ‘This Market Is Nuts’: S&P 500 Hits Record, Defying Economic Devastation

‘This Market Is Nuts’: S&P 500 Hits Record, Defying Economic Devastation
Investors have cast the nearly relentless drumbeat of bad news aside to focus on any signs that the worst of the coronavirus pandemic might be over.

Widespread economic devastation, severe unemployment and a grim prognosis for recovery have not stopped the stock market’s exuberance. And on Tuesday, that undying optimism propelled the market to a new high, pushing it past a milestone reached only six months ago, when the coronavirus was just beginning its harrowing journey across the United States.

“This market is nuts,” said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst for S&P Dow Jones Indices.

To those outside Wall Street, the market’s rise may appear inexplicable given the human and economic toll of the virus, and a stalemate in Washington that has paralyzed efforts to provide more relief that many businesses and workers desperately need. Still, investors have cast the nearly relentless drumbeat of bad news aside to focus on any signs that the worst might be over. They have also been emboldened by the Federal Reserve’s steadfast support of the markets and unwavering embrace of low interest rates.

Investors are taking into account the fact that the virus, which had seen a recent surge that threatened to set back much of the country a second time, has shown signs of abating, with the number of new cases declining by 16 percent over the last 14 days, according to data compiled by The New York Times. Expectations for 2020 corporate profits, formulated by Wall Street analysts, seem to have stopped plummeting. Also, slow but notable progress toward a vaccine, which many manufacturers and public health experts say could be ready by next year, has made many investors bullish.

And the economy is improving, even if the recovery is tepid. Some 1.8 million new jobs were added in July, and weekly state unemployment benefit claims have fallen below one million for the first time since March.

Together, these data points have been enough to create an outlook that, while not exactly rosy, is at least no longer pallid. At the same time, the improvements are hardly so significant that they would prompt the Federal Reserve to pull back its support for the economy. The Fed has started new programs to buy Treasury bonds and other financial assets to calm investors, and is financing those programs by essentially creating new money.

“It seems to me that markets have decided this economic environment is the best of both worlds: enough economic recovery to support corporate earnings and prevent a substantial recession, but not so much that the Fed would have to raise interest rates and tighten monetary policy,” said Scott Clemons, chief investment strategist for private banking at Brown Brothers Harriman, an investment bank.

Several times in recent days, the S&P 500 had crisscrossed its Feb. 19 closing high of 3,386.15 in intraday trading, before falling below that level to end the trading day. But on Tuesday, the blue chip index notched a modest gain of 0.2 percent, to close at 3,389.78, after another solid performance by major technology companies. Amazon.com rose 4.1 percent, pulling the Nasdaq composite index to a fresh record as well. The Dow Jones industrial average slipped 0.2 percent.

Tuesday’s rise was the latest chapter in a remarkable rebound for the stock market after a nearly 34 percent collapse in February and March. It was the fastest-ever nosedive of more than 30 percent from a peak, reflecting the depths of panic as investors began to consider the economic costs of the pandemic. Those fears were warranted. Since March, the economy has suffered the sharpest collapse since the Great Depression. An estimated 28 million Americans are receiving unemployment benefits. The economy has been almost decimated, as gross domestic product shrank nearly 10 percent during the second quarter of the year, wiping out nearly five years of economic growth.

After that initial steep decline, however, the stock market began to recover and has done so steadily since, in a marked display of what analysts describe, by turns, as optimism, hubris or sheer speculative greed that is heavily reliant on federal spending, easy monetary policy and continued signs of progress in the hunt for virus vaccines. The result has been a remarkable rally of more than 50 percent that has underscored the dissonance that sometimes exists between the markets and the economy.

Editors’ Picks

The Race Is On to Be the Peloton of Weight Lifting

What Scares Salem? October Without Halloween

He’s Sharing the History of Black New York, One Tweet at a Time
Continue reading the main story
During the deep recession that followed the financial crisis of 2008, financial markets recovered faster than employment, wages and business activity. The S&P 500 was hitting record highs by early 2013, a year before the U.S. job market replaced all the jobs lost in the downturn.

In part, that reflects the forward-looking nature of the stock market, where — in theory — investors buy stocks based on long-term expectations for profits and dividends they expect companies to generate, rather than how they’re faring when the shares are purchased.

The American economy continues to struggle, but investors widely believe that the worst of the coronavirus-related downturn is over. Earlier this month, economists at Goldman Sachs upgraded their outlook for economic growth in 2021, writing that they “now expect that at least one vaccine will be approved by the end of 2020” and be widely distributed in early 2021. Last week, stock market analysts at the firm raised their year-end estimates for the S&P 500, saying the broad index could rise to 3,600 or a further 6 percent or so.

But the divergence between the path of financial markets and the current health of the economy also highlights the fact that, despite looming large in the American psyche, the stock market is not a particularly good reflection of the broader U.S. economy or the mood of the American middle class.

Many Americans own stock, but the vast majority of shares owned by households are controlled by the wealthiest people in the country, making them less likely to feel the pain of the economic slump.

And only a tiny fraction of American businesses — less than 1 percent of those with 20 employees or more, according to one finance professor — are publicly traded. Those whose shares trade on the open market tend to be much larger and better financed than a typical firm.

Even among publicly traded companies, almost all the gains in major stock market indexes this year are attributable to the surging share prices of a few giant technology companies, foremost among them Apple, Amazon and Microsoft.

Barron's : Retail Stocks Are Falling Despite Blockbuster Profits. Why the Market

Retail Stocks Are Falling Despite Blockbuster Profits. Why the Market Doesn’t Trust the Numbers.

Retailers put out great numbers on Tuesday. Their stocks are falling anyway.

Home Depot (ticker: HD) easily blew past analysts’ expectations, while Walmart (WMT) saw e-commerce sales nearly double. Even Kohl’s (KSS), which operates in the structurally challenged department- store sector, lost much less than expected. Yet Home Depot and Walmart were off 0.9% and 0.5%, respectively, in afternoon trading, while Kohl’s had plunged 15%.

The issue that is weighing on the stocks is the question that has dogged many 2020 outperformers: How long can this go on?

There are some parallels with what’s happening the broader market as well. The S&P 500 just hit a new high while the Nasdaq Composite has notched more than 30 records this year. The gains have left some scratching their heads, as they have come at a time when the pandemic has led to record unemployment and a potential eviction crisis. (In fact only about 23% of U.S. investors expect the S&P 500 to go higher over the next six months, according to a recent survey by the American Association of Individual Investors.)

Whether the gains will last may be less of a concern in terms of big tech, given how resilient these companies have been. Yet other areas of the market look more vulnerable, and retailers definitely fall within that group. It’s hard to ignore the worry that sales will slump as Americans tighten their belts.

Walmart is a perfect example. Analysts love the stock, given that as an essential retailer, Walmart has been able to capitalize on consumers’ preference to make fewer trips out (and their tendency to buy more when they do). Certainly, there’s no denying that Walmart has been a winner, and the company’s strong quarter showed that.

Yet while investors expected some slowdown from recent highs, a modest 4% rise in same-store sales last month—which the company said was due in part to stimulus checks running out—may represent more weakness than anticipated. Comparable-store sales for the entire second quarter increased 9.3%.

RBC Capital Markets’ Scot Ciccarelli notes that the “change may give some investors pause as ‘sales sustainability’ is one of today’s key topics in retail.” He highlighted comments from management about normalizing sales trends, which “may suggest that the outsize gains experienced over the last few months may be starting to ebb.” He said RBC remains a fan of Walmart, but that other stocks the firm covers offer a better balance of risks and potential rewards.

Subscriptions to Sam’s Club surged, showing that value is still a huge advantage in today’s retail landscape, as Barron’s has noted before. Yet Walmart’s base of lower-income customers may be less able to keep spending without more government help, given the severity of the Covid-19 crisis.

Moreover, cash-strapped consumers have less brand loyalty. Data from Placer.ai showed that competition is a concern. Last year, 19.4% of Walmart shoppers visited a Dollar General (DG), but that number grew to 24.2% so far in 2020.

Home Depot held on to gains longer Tuesday morning before falling into the red. That’s likely because its results looked even stronger, and the company’s foot traffic has held up relatively well. Data from Placer.ai showed that traffic was up 26% year over year in May, and that June and July visits were up by around 19%. The strength continued into early August.

“This earnings report shows that Covid-19 quarantines have caused millennials to discover home ownership and home improvement,” says Bill Smead, chief Investment officer of Smead Capital Management. And presumably, new home buyers are in better financial shape than lower-income peers, meaning thy should be able to maintain their spending more easily.

Yet even here, investors are concerned about sustainability, especially if people use the good weather to make all the necessary changes to their homes now. On Home Depot’s conference call, CEO Craig Menear said the company is reluctant to extrapolate trends from the first half of the year into a forecast for the rest of 2020.

Given that digital sales jumped 100% and sales trends have held up in recent weeks, that may be more about managing expectations than signaling trouble ahead. Still, costs remain high. The company will have to keep paying for stringent safety protocols even if demand tapers off as colder weather arrives.

Kohl’s is a slightly different story: Department stores have been suffering for years, and the pandemic has only accelerated their losses of market share to online rivals. It doesn’t help that the company has numerous stores in places such as Texas and California that have been hard hit with Covid-19 this summer.

Even if a vaccine were approved tomorrow, it wouldn’t solve all of Kohl’s problems, but the fact that a solution is likely much farther away makes the issue more pressing. As remote learning and working remains a reality for many, clothing sales have stagnated, and Kohl’s shoppers may also be less inclined to spend without further government stimulus.

Kohl’s will likely continue to struggle. “We think investors are underestimating issue of saturation in the U.S. retail market and, as we learned from '08 Financial Crisis, the retailers most mired in debt and lagging in omnichannel (pre Covid-19) run a real risk of going bust,” writes CFRA analyst Camilla Yanushevsky.

But are investors right to question the sustainability of Walmart and Home Depot’s gains? No one expects sales to stay as high as they were during the panic buying of the spring, but with the shares up more than 13% and 30%, respectively, it’s absolutely valid to wonder if the decline will be swift or gentle.

At this point, it’s too early to tell, especially given that if another round of stimulus and enhanced unemployment benefits are approved, that would certainly boost spending at both companies.

But even without one, it’s hard to argue that both won’t be winners, at least in the long term, given their size and consumer trends.

WWD : Tiffany & Co. Now Offers a Complete Lens Into Diamonds’ Origins

Tiffany & Co. Now Offers a Complete Lens Into Diamonds’ Origins
Tiffany & Co. will disclose where its diamonds are sorted, cut, polished and set, among other steps in the sourcing and supply chain.

Tiffany & Co. is making good on its promise to offer consumers a complete lens into the origins of its diamonds.

The jeweler today said new diamonds weighing more than 0.18 carats will be offered with a completely transparent background — allowing shoppers a window into the stone’s “craftsmanship journey,” meaning the precise locations where it was sorted, planned, cut, polished, graded and set.

These efforts add to an initial benchmark set in 2019 when all Tiffany solitaire diamonds began being sold with the country or region of origin where they were mined. While that information will continue to be displayed in Tiffany caselines, this craftsmanship journey will be included on each stone’s Tiffany diamond certificate and be available for all sales associates to show shoppers.

Each initiative is an industry first for a jeweler of Tiffany’s size. The jewelry industry has for years battled with issues of opacity around its sourcing of stones, labor practices and sustainability even as it tries to increase demand among Millennials, the younger of whom are beginning to get engaged and buying engagement and wedding rings.

For Tiffany chief executive officer Alessandro Bogliolo, “There couldn’t be better timing than this to announce such an initiative, even though we started [the process] 20 years ago. It was just the decision of my predecessor to do the right thing and we are fortunate to give consumers visibility to the efforts the company has given in the last 20 years.”

Tiffany’s investment in vertical integration may have been charted years ago, but it was Bogliolo’s decision to disclose details of a stone’s origins as a new-world sales strategy. The program, Bogliolo confirmed, does not affect the price of diamonds sold at Tiffany’s.

“It’s something that cannot be easily replicated by competitors,” said the executive. “You have to put in a lot of investment and work, it’s not something that can be done immediately by other companies. I hope this breaks the bar and consumers start demanding the provenance and journey of a diamond with any sale.…It shows it’s possible to do the right thing — even in diamonds that are considered ethically nontransparent. This is really changing the standards of the industry.”

Bogliolo noted that Tiffany’s transparency efforts will have particular resonance with young consumers. “In the past, if you look at our parents, they bought a diamond ring [for engagement] because it was the rule. Now, it’s up to every individual to decide, there is an option to buy or not. The value [of our traceability initiative] is huge because it’s an incentive to buy. I believe it can convince many customers to purchase a diamond instead of stepping away from it,” Bogliolo said.

While demand for traceability and sustainably sourced stones began in the U.S., Bogliolo noted that other markets, including Australia, have begun expecting higher ethical standards from jewelers. “Even markets like China have evolved a lot more recently. The acceleration of consumer trends has made this relevant for consumers in China and generally in Asia. Very young consumers there care about making a purchase that is important and ethically right,” he said.

Tiffany chief sustainability officer Anisa Kamadoli Costa added: “By procuring diamonds as rough and crafting them in our own workshops, it means there is not only traceability, but also an assurance that the communities where Tiffany diamonds are made are seeing a positive impact.”

While earlier indications hinted that Tiffany may extend its traceability efforts to colored gemstones, Kamadoli Costa said: “Given our business, we have a great opportunity with diamonds today, so we are focusing on diamonds right now. To give more context, about 80 percent of color gemstones come from small mines, so it is difficult to source their origins.”

Tiffany’s traceability efforts arrive as many consumers have adapted to buying fine jewelry online — a result of coronavirus lockdowns. Bogliolo said the jeweler saw two sales trends during quarantine. “There has been higher purchase online for engagement rings. Before, a couple could go to a store, but now that’s not possible. Thank God we have 95 percent of stores open again, but during lockdown people couldn’t buy physically in-store, so we saw big increases online, even for wedding bands and diamond rings.”

He added that on the flip side, “[Some] people didn’t make that purchase during lockdown, so when the store opened there was a backlog of customers who had postponed their purchases. They were not emotional purchases you do on the [spur of the] moment.”

Tiffany is still in the process of being acquired by LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton. Last month, LVMH chief financial officer Jean-Jacques Guiony gave a brief update on LVMH’s $16.2 billion acquisition of the U.S. jeweler, saying half-a-dozen antitrust filings were pending, though he did not specify in which countries. “Things are moving forward,” Guiony said on a conference call. “But I don’t really know when all the go-aheads will be given.”

(ZH) Close Call: Asteroid Unexpectedly Makes The Closest Pass Of Earth On Record

Close Call: Asteroid Unexpectedly Makes The Closest Pass Of Earth On Record

Asteroid 2020QG just made the closely pass-by of our planet on record. The most amazing part? Scientists didn't even see it coming.
The asteroid came as close as 4,778 miles from the center of the Earth, according to NASA’s database of near Earth objects and a new report by Forbes. At its lowest point, it could have been just 1,000 miles over our heads - lower than almost all artificial satellites that are currently orbiting the Earth.
The asteroid wasn't spotted until after it passed the Earth, which is wild considering it is officially the closest call since we started following such passes nearly 100 years ago.

The asteroid had a diameter of about 10-20 feet, according to NASA, who also says that the asteroid likely didn't pose a threat even if it had entered into the Earth's atmosphere. It would have likely burned up in the atmosphere, NASA said.
A similar sized asteroid was spotted in 2018 and, after entry into the Earth's atmosphere, "only the tiniest bits" made it to the ground. It caused no reported damage or injuries.
And because nothing involving science or outer space can be brought up without bringing up the world's greatest faux-scientist, Elon Musk, Forbes commented that the object was "roughly the size of a Tesla Model 3, which makes you wonder for a second if the car Elon Musk famously launched towards Mars might have activated its autonomous boosters and attempted to make its way home."

FT : Pinduoduo clashes with Tesla in China over discounted cars

Pinduoduo clashes with Tesla in China over discounted cars
Analysts say episode suggests ecommerce group taking subsidies-based model to new level

China’s Pinduoduo has clashed with Tesla after it sold the US group’s electric vehicles at a hefty discount, highlighting the ecommerce platform’s controversial use of big subsidies.

Pinduoduo, the most valuable company in the world to have never turned an operating profit, last month hosted a group-buying event in which Chinese shoppers could buy a Tesla Model 3 for significantly below its Rmb291,800 ($42,100) price tag.

But Tesla originally said it would not deliver the cars, pointing to a company policy that bans the resale of its vehicles. Tesla, which recently became the world’s most valuable carmaker, only sells its vehicles directly to buyers via its website, bypassing dealers.

Pinduoduo is well-known for offering customers generous subsidies, which it records as sales and marketing fees. In the first three months of this year, these fees were greater than its revenues. Analysts question if its business model can become sustainable.

Despite that, the group’s US-listed shares have surged 138 per cent this year to give Pinduoduo a value of roughly $110bn.

But analysts said the sales of the discounted Tesla cars had taken its use of subsidy-based marketing to a new level. Pinduoduo sold five Model 3s at about a 14 per cent discount, with the company and one of its online merchants making up the difference to the official price, according to Chinese media reports. 

Shawn Yang, managing director at Blue Lotus Capital Advisors, said the Tesla stunt suggested Pinduoduo was trying to shake off its reputation as a platform for cheap goods. Last year, its average order was worth just Rmb51. “It doesn’t want to stay that way and they’ve been doing a lot to let people know they have high-value stuff on their platform like iPhones or Teslas to try to attract high-value users.”

“It's all about marketing,” said another Hong Kong-based equity analyst. “Last year they sold Wuling [cheap minivans], this year they sold Cadillac and now they are selling Tesla. They want to get rid of their low-end image.” 

Pinduoduo was increasing subsidies to lift its growth but doing so only added to its losses, said one industry insider. “It’s an endless loop,” he said.

Sales on Pinduoduo have on occasion displeased Western brands, including Apple, whose high-end iPhones it sells with hundreds of dollars knocked off the retail price despite not being an authorised reseller. Apple declined to comment.

Tesla’s decision not to honour the Pinduoduo sales also yielded criticism of the carmaker, for which China is an important market. The group sold 45,721 vehicles in China in the first half of 2020, accounting for about a quarter of its total deliveries globally.

Qiu Baochang, an expert at the official China Consumers' Association, called Tesla’s actions “improper” and said they had “hurt consumers’ legitimate rights and interests”.

“Through giving a sizeable subsidy, Pinduoduo may have earned massive traffic, there is nothing wrong with that,” said Mr Qiu. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Tesla on Monday pledged unspecified compensation to those who ordered a car via Pinduoduo for “losses of time and energy” if they repurchased the vehicle through its own website.

On Chinese social media, some users argued that the buzz generated by the Tesla incident could only be a good thing for Pinduoduo.

“Tesla has been played by Pinduoduo — it got all the attention and free advertising and in the end didn’t bear any responsibility,” said one user on China’s Twitter-like Weibo platform.