WSJ : Pence Faces Dilemma Over Biden Election Confirmation, as Trump Digs In

Pence Faces Dilemma Over Biden Election Confirmation, as Trump Digs In
Vice president seeks to balance his constitutional role in ratifying the Nov. 3 results with the president’s concerns

DALTON, Ga.—Rallying voters in Georgia ahead of Tuesday’s Senate runoff elections, President Trump delivered a political message to an entirely different audience: his vice president.

“I hope that Mike Pence comes through for us,” Mr. Trump said to cheers. “He’s a great guy. Of course if he doesn’t come through, I won’t like him quite as much.”

The pressure play Monday night came two days before Mr. Pence is set to take on perhaps his most politically challenging task in four years as a loyal second-in-command. On Wednesday he will oversee a joint session of Congress that is expected to ratify Democrat President-elect Joe Biden’s Electoral College win, even as Mr. Trump continues to reject the results and some Capitol Hill allies plan to contest some state results.

On Tuesday, Mr. Trump added further pressure by tweeting, “The Vice President has the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors.”

The states have already certified their results from their electors, and the vice president doesn’t have the power to alter them.

While Mr. Pence’s role as president of the Senate is largely ceremonial, some of the president’s most devoted supporters demand more aggressive action.

“We know this thing was stolen, and we hope and pray the vice president steps up and stands up for President Trump,” said Perry Hooper Jr. , a prominent Alabama Republican.

Despite Mr. Trump’s claims, he and his supporters have failed to present evidence of widespread voter fraud and have been rebuked in dozens of legal rulings.

Conscious of his own political future, Mr. Pence, 61 years old, must balance the concerns of Mr. Trump’s sizable base and the constitutional requirements of his position. He has been thrust into a growing Republican divide over the president’s relentless push.

“He is in a very complicated and difficult position,” said Republican pollster Dave Winston. “He needs to come off as being fair and balanced, focused on what the Senate needs to do, what the Senate represents in a very contentious situation.”

Mr. Trump concluded his comments Monday by saying that with Mr. Pence, “you’re going to get a straight shot.”

During the 1 p.m. Wednesday session, Mr. Pence will open up all the certificates reflecting the vote tallies sent by the states. He will hand them to “tellers,” who are people appointed from the House and the Senate to read the ballots and verify the results. The tellers will then read the states’ certificates in alphabetical order. None of the efforts to contest the results are expected to succeed.

Mr. Pence has been reviewing the law and consulting experts, including speaking with the Senate parliamentarian. A senior administration official said that Mr. Pence “will follow the law and uphold the constitution.”

Since November, the vice president—who allies stress has been loyal to Mr. Trump—has walked a careful line as the president has steadily amplified his claims of a rigged election. Mr. Pence has told Republicans that legal votes must be counted and illegal ones thrown out.

A Republican congressman’s long shot effort to give Mr. Pence more power over the proceedings was rejected by a federal judge. The House of Representatives asked for the case to be dismissed and the Justice Department, acting on behalf of Mr. Pence, also weighed in against the suit.

Mr. Trump was surprised about the Justice filing, said a person familiar with his thinking.

At his own rally earlier Monday in Georgia, Mr. Pence responded to voters shouting “stop the steal,” saying: “We all got our doubts about the last election. And I want to assure you, I share the concerns of millions of Americans about voting irregularities. And I promise you, come this Wednesday, we’ll have our day in Congress.”

Mr. Pence’s team had already sought to manage the tricky situation. Chief of staff Marc Short issued a statement Saturday after a group of Senate Republicans said they planned to raise challenges to some of the states’ results. He said the vice president welcomed the efforts of Congressional members to “use the authority they have under the law to raise objections and bring forward evidence.”

The statement was well received by the president, said a person familiar with his thinking. Mr. Trump huddled with Mr. Pence, Mr. Short and others in the Oval Office late Monday. Mr. Short declined to discuss private conversations between the president and vice president.

Mr. Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said during a podcast interview with conservative Charlie Kirk posted Monday that the president and vice president were reviewing research and would likely not make a decision until Tuesday on what Mr. Pence should do on Wednesday. He said the president “will make this decision, based on his judgment and the advice that he gets on what the constitution demands.”

Some Trump advisers are promoting the idea that the vice president could have a more expansive role. On Fox News over the weekend, Trump adviser Peter Navarro incorrectly argued that Mr. Pence had the authority to delay the process and grant a 10-day audit of the results.

“Peter Navarro is many things,“ Mr. Short said of that claim. “He is not a constitutional scholar.”

Aides to Mr. Pence are frustrated, a person close to the situation said, describing an “impossible position where he can’t please anybody.” But one person close to the White House argued that Mr. Pence is “always in that balancing act.”

A cautious presence in Mr. Trump’s frequently chaotic administration, Mr. Pence is consistently deferential to the president and takes care to never reveal White House ambitions of his own.

Using more diplomatic language and soothing tones, he calmly flanked Mr. Trump during the investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election, the impeachment of the president by the U.S. House and the tumultuous response to the coronavirus pandemic.

Should Mr. Trump opt out of a 2024 presidential bid, Mr. Pence is one of a number of Republicans likely to jockey for the nomination. Former Michigan GOP chairman Saul Anuzis said Mr. Pence could be a strong presidential prospect.

“He’s not the most dynamic and exciting type of candidate,” Mr. Anuzis said. “But America might be ready for calm.”

FT : Vaccine delays risk more than halving global growth, World Bank warns

Vaccine delays risk more than halving global growth, World Bank warns
Logistical problems and reluctance to be immunised pose threat to economic recovery

The global economic recovery from Covid-19 will rely heavily on the successful rollout of vaccines, the World Bank has warned, adding that any delay risks more than halving this year’s growth rate. 

At best the world faces “a slow and challenging recovery”, the bank said.

The multilateral lender forecast on Tuesday that world GDP would grow by 4 per cent in 2021, a pace that would still leave economic activity 4.4 per cent below its pre-pandemic path by 2022. But this assumes rapid progress with vaccination campaigns in advanced economies and in major emerging and developing countries, reaching widespread coverage by the second half of 2021.

This recovery could easily be derailed, the World Bank warned. If infections continue to rise and vaccine rollouts in major economies are slowed by logistical problems and people’s reluctance to be immunised, global GDP could expand by as little as 1.6 per cent this year, it estimated.

David Malpass, president of the World Bank, said the rollout of vaccinations was already running into problems.

“Even in advanced economies there have been difficulties in pushing ahead with vaccination programmes, and that is true in poor countries as well,” he said. “Advanced economies have reserved vaccines beyond their capacity to distribute them, so we are hoping they will free up some of those for purchase and distribution in poorer countries.”

In an extreme scenario, in which financial stress leads to widespread corporate and government defaults, the global economy could contract for a second consecutive year, the bank said.

After an initial wave of economic optimism late last year, as the prospect of vaccinations became a reality, the challenges of implementing a mass rollout have become clearer. EU authorities are under fire for their sluggish start — France vaccinated just 350 people in the first week, while Germany’s government is accused of failing to procure enough doses.

Meanwhile, Britain has entered a new lockdown to combat the spread of a more transmissible mutation of the virus, and worries are growing that a new South African strain could to lead to vaccine-resistant variants.

“Policymakers face formidable challenges — in public health, debt management, budget policies, central banking and structural reforms — as they try to ensure that this still-fragile global recovery gains traction and sets a foundation for robust growth,” Mr Malpass said.

The outlook is equally bleak for advanced and emerging economies. In the bank’s central scenario, growth in the rich world is set to average 3.3 per cent this year. In emerging and developing economies excluding China — where output is expected to rebound to a 7.9 per cent expansion — it would average 3.4 per cent.

Mr Malpass warned that stimulus programmes in advanced economies, including large-scale asset purchase programmes, risked aggravating the problem of inequality.

“Stimulus mechanisms are working to concentrate wealth at the top rather than adding wealth from the bottom up,” he said. “People at the bottom are going down even as people at the top are going up.”

Institutional reforms to spur growth will be crucial once the immediate health crisis begins to ease because many countries already have high debt levels and weak fiscal positions, the World Bank said.

Even before coronavirus hit, global growth had been expected to slow over the next decade, due to under-investment and shrinking labour forces in advanced economies. The pandemic is likely to worsen this slowdown, doing lasting damage to health, education and corporate balance sheets, the World Bank said.

Without comprehensive reforms “if history is any guide, the global economy is heading for a decade of growth disappointments”, it said.

Bus. Of Fashion : How Covid-19 Is Catalysing a New Era of Luxury


Challenges : already some problems between Xavier Niel (Free) and the probable b

(Google Translate)
Telecoms: already some problems between Xavier Niel (Free) and the probable boss of Arcep?
By Delphine Dechaux on 01.05.2021 at 3:59 p.m.
What does Xavier Niel play? The boss of Free considered "absurd" the choice of Laure de la Raudière at the head of the telecoms gendarme, whose appointment should be confirmed in the coming hours. Decryption.

If Laure de la Raudière were to become, as an Elysée press release has yet to confirm, president of the Electronic Communications and Postal Regulatory Authority (Arcep), her relations with one of the four operators are starting very strong.

Interviewed Monday January 4 on BFM Business, Xavier Niel, the founder of Free and main shareholder of Iliad, pretended not to believe in his arrival at the head of the telecoms gendarme, judging that the "rumor" of this appointment could not to be a "typo" or an error of the newspaper Les Echos, which gives it for favorite. "To appoint as the head of an independent authority someone who worked for fifteen years at Orange, that strikes me as quite surprising," quipped the founder of Free. And to add: "We need a man or a woman who knows telecoms as well as Laure de la Raudière but who has not worked in the sector". His candidate was Antoine Darodes, an Arcep alumnus who oversaw the Very High Speed ​​plan before being chief of staff of the State Secretariat for the Digital Transition. "This candidate benefited from the support of the Elysee but also of Xavier Niel (Free) and Stéphane Richard (Orange)", told Challenges a telecoms big name.

While the appointment of Sébastien Soriano's successor was considered "a done deal since Friday" by industry observers and should have been announced by the Elysee on Monday, the suspense continues.

A more political profile in the face of the "techno" candidate
Member of the AGIR group, Laure de la Raudière is close to the Minister of the Economy and Finance, Bruno Le Maire, who supported her candidacy. Warm and accessible, after her thirteen years as a deputy, she has the advantage of long experience in public life, coupled with in-depth knowledge of the sector, facing her competitor with a more "techno" profile. A former student of the Ecole normale supérieure and a graduate of the Télécom Paris school, she indeed, as Xavier Niel noted, started her career with the incumbent operator, before founding a consulting firm in networks and telecommunications. Then, the MEP for Eure et Loire never took her eyes off the sector. Member of the Economic Affairs Committee, she co-chaired the Cybersecurity and Digital Sovereignty group, among other things, and signed several reports with MEPs Eric Bothorel and Corinne Erhel. From the benches of the Assembly, she did not hesitate to spur the telecoms gendarme. Author of a report on the digital coverage of the territory, she had thus highlighted "a worrying discrepancy between the coverage maps and the reality perceived on the ground".

Would it be a mortal sin to have worked at Orange at the head of an independent authority? From the point of view of Arcep's statutes, there is no conflict of interest or ethical issue. The authority demands that the president has not worked for a private company in the three years preceding his appointment. However, it is twenty years since Laure de la Raudière left her position at Orange to found a start-up, in 2001. She has devoted herself to politics for thirteen years.

In addition, there is no shortage of examples of regulators from operators in other countries, even if these presidents of authority rather come from the ranks of the challengers and not from the incumbent operators. The American Tom Wheeler, who has done a lot to strengthen competition in the United States, had for example led the FCC (Federal Communications Commission), while he had previously played the chief lobbyists at the head of the federation of cable operators.

Xavier Niel's statements are all the more astonishing given that the Arcep presidency nomination process was, for the first time, marked out and organized, with hearings of the finalist candidates, in particular with Alexis Kohler, secretary. General of the Elysée, and Claire Landais, Secretary General of the Government.

Could the intervention of Xavier Niel, close to Emmanuel Macron, reshuffle the process? The interference of the boss of an operator in the appointment of his supervisory authority would be shocking and, for once, clearly contrary to the rules of ethics. "It would be scandalous, lunar. It would mean that the vice-president of the country has succeeded in influencing the President of the Republic", thunders an observer of the sector. Even risking penalizing the Elysee Palace, the maneuver therefore seems unlikely to succeed. "I rather see in Xavier Niel's words a man

Challenges : Télécoms: déjà du rififi entre Xavier Niel (Free) et la probable pa

Télécoms: déjà du rififi entre Xavier Niel (Free) et la probable patronne de l’Arcep?
Par Delphine Dechaux le 05.01.2021 à 15h59ABONNÉS
A quoi joue Xavier Niel? Le patron de Free a jugé "aberrant" le choix de Laure de la Raudière à la tête du gendarme des télécoms, dont la nomination devrait être confirmée dans les prochaines heures. Décryptage.

Si Laure de la Raudière devenait, comme un communiqué de l’Elysée doit encore le confirmer, présidente de l’Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des Postes (Arcep), ses relations avec l’un des quatre opérateurs commencent très fort.

Interviewé lundi 4 janvier sur BFM Business, Xavier Niel, le fondateur de Free et principal actionnaire d’Iliad, a feint de ne pas croire à son arrivée à la tête du gendarme des télécoms, jugeant que la "rumeur" de cette nomination ne pouvait être qu’une "coquille" ou une erreur du journal Les Echos, qui la donnent pour favorite. "Nommer à la tête d’une autorité indépendante quelqu’un qui a travaillé quinze ans chez Orange, cela me paraît assez surprenant", a raillé le fondateur de Free. Et d’ajouter: "On a besoin d’un homme ou d’une femme qui connaisse aussi bien les télécoms que Laure de la Raudière mais qui n’ait pas travaillé dans le secteur". Son candidat à lui, c’était Antoine Darodes, un ancien de l’Arcep ayant chapeauté le plan Très Haute Débit avant d’être directeur de cabinet du Secrétariat d’Etat à la Transition numérique. "Ce candidat bénéficiait du soutien de l’Elysée mais aussi de Xavier Niel (Free) et de Stéphane Richard (Orange)", précise à Challenges une pointure des télécoms.

Alors que la nomination du successeur de Sébastien Soriano était considérée comme "chose faite depuis vendredi" par les observateurs du secteur et aurait dû être annoncée par l’Elysée dès lundi, le suspense se prolonge.

Un profil plus politique face au candidat "techno"
Députée du groupe AGIR, Laure de la Raudière est proche du ministre de l’Economie et des Finances, Bruno Le Maire, qui soutenait sa candidature. Chaleureuse et accessible, elle affiche, après ses treize années de députation, face à son concurrent au profil plus "techno", l’avantage d’une longue expérience de la vie publique, couplée à une connaissance approfondie du secteur. Ancienne élève de l’Ecole normale supérieure et diplômée de l'école Télécom Paris, elle a en effet, comme l’a bien noté Xavier Niel, démarré sa carrière chez l’opérateur historique, avant de fonder un cabinet de conseil en réseaux et télécommunications. Ensuite, la députée d’Eure et Loire n’a jamais quitté des yeux le secteur. Membre de la commission des Affaires économiques, elle a entre autres co-présidé le groupe Cybersécurité et souveraineté numérique, et signé plusieurs rapports avec les députés Eric Bothorel et Corinne Erhel. Depuis les bancs de l’Assemblée, elle n’hésitait pas à aiguillonner le gendarme des télécoms. Auteure d’un rapport sur la couverture numérique du territoire, elle avait ainsi mis en lumière "un décalage préoccupant entre les cartes de couverture et la réalité perçue sur le terrain".

Le fait d’avoir travaillé chez Orange serait-il un péché mortel à la tête d’une autorité indépendante? Du point de vue des statuts de l’Arcep, le conflit d’intérêts ou de problème déontologique n’existe pas. L’autorité exige que le président n’ait pas travaillé pour une entreprise privée dans les trois ans précédant sa nomination. Or, il y a vingt ans que Laure de la Raudière a quitté ses fonctions chez Orange pour fonder une start-up, en 2001. Elle se consacre à la vie politique depuis treize ans.

Par ailleurs, les exemples de régulateurs issus des opérateurs ne manquent pas dans d’autres pays, même si ces présidents d’autorité sont plutôt issus des rangs des challengers et non des opérateurs historiques. L’Américain Tom Wheeler, qui a beaucoup œuvré à renforcer la concurrence aux Etats-Unis, avait par exemple dirigé la FCC (Commission fédérale des communications), alors qu’il avait précédemment joué les lobbyistes en chef à la tête de la fédération des câblo-opérateurs.

Les déclarations de Xavier Niel sont d’autant plus étonnantes que le processus de nomination à la présidence de l’Arcep a été, pour la première fois, balisé et organisé, avec des auditions des candidats finalistes, notamment auprès d’Alexis Kohler, secrétaire générale de l'Elysée, et de Claire Landais, secrétaire générale du gouvernement.

L’intervention de Xavier Niel, proche d’Emmanuel Macron, pourrait-elle rebattre les cartes du processus? L’ingérence du patron d’un opérateur dans la nomination de son autorité de tutelle serait choquante et, pour le coup, clairement contraire aux règles de déontologie. "Ce serait scandaleux, lunaire. Ca voudrait dire que le vice-président du pays a réussi à influencer le président de la République", tonne un observateur du secteur. En risquant même de pénaliser l’Elysée, la manœuvre semble donc peu susceptible d’aboutir. "Je vois plutôt dans le propos de Xavier Niel une manière de mettre la pression sur l’Arcep, pour les prochains dossiers, décode un autre connaisseur. Chaque fois que Laure de la Raudière prendra un dossier, Xavier Niel se fera fort de dire 'je vous l’avais bien dit' et de crier au favoritisme en faveur d’Orange". Un autre abonde: "De façon habile, Xavier Niel a créé par ses propos une onde de suspicion. A l’avenir, la nouvelle présidente de l’Arcep serait écoutée de façon particulière, quoi qu’elle dise, dès lors que cela concerne Orange ou même Free". Sympathique cadeau de bienvenue.

WSJ : How Much Debt Is Too Much? It Depends on Your View of Inflation

How Much Debt Is Too Much? It Depends on Your View of Inflation
There is broad agreement that inflation is the ultimate constraint on government debt. The question is how inflation works in the real world.


The pandemic will leave Western nations carrying the biggest public-debt pile as a percentage of gross domestic product since World War II. To deal with it, they will need a better grasp of inflation.

So far, fears about high debt-to-GDP ratios have been proven repeatedly wrong. Even so, officials are already trying to set limits. In the eurozone, deficit caps will likely return. In the U.K., Treasury chief Rishi Sunak has dubbed the path of public finances “unsustainable.”

If activist fiscal policy is to survive, new rules are required. Should they aim to stave off “bond vigilantes,” or simply not stoke inflation?

The latter focus has been popularized by the contentious school of thought known as Modern Monetary Theory, but the divide isn’t what it seems. Even vociferous opponents of MMT share the assumption that inflation is the true constraint on fiscal policy. The differences concern how inflation works.


Among the traditionalists, ex-Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers and former Barack Obama adviser Jason Furman recently wrote that debt hasn’t been a problem because interest rates are so low. Governments can spend, they argued, as long as their net interest payments stay below 1% of GDP, adjusted for inflation.

For former International Monetary Fund chief economist Olivier Blanchard, the key is that government bond yields are lower than expected GDP growth rates. Even if a one-off stimulus leads debt-to-GDP to shoot up, forward-looking investors then know that the math will eventually bring it down—as happened after WWII.

Both arguments raise the specter of market forces: Loose debt issuance is allowed now but may not be in the future. Since 1881, bond yields have been above growth rates about 40% of the time, including most of the post-1980s era.

But, as Mr. Summers himself recently underscored, bond yields are also linked to inflation. If governments keep borrowing too much, the theory goes, interest rates will rise. At some point, printing money will be the only alternative to a default, creating inflation. By contrast, MMT advocates see inflation as a result of too much spending, regardless of whether it is financed by money or debt. This is the real clash.


So far, the latter theory seems to fit the facts better, given that central banks have spent a decade buying trillions of dollars of bonds without triggering inflation.

Many economists argue that this is yet another result of rates being suppressed by social and market forces, but this is also suspect. Inflation-adjusted long-term yields have historically tracked central-bank policy, even in periods when central banks weren’t focused on growth and inflation, such as under the 1880-1914 gold standard. The fact they are deeply negative now says much more about Federal Reserve policy than economic fundamentals.

If interest payments on the debt are themselves broadly determined by policy makers, they can’t be a good canary in the coal mine. Fiscal policy could be both too tight and too loose and still comply with such a rule.

What indicators should policy makers follow then? Inflation itself is a good bet, though consumer-price baskets are crude—they often obfuscate specific supply shortages, as happened this year. Governments will need to monitor and control consumer spending and industry bottlenecks, as well as automatically link stimulus programs to persistent increases in unemployment, rather than leaving them to officials’ discretion. Outside of the U.S., much more attention should be devoted to the exchange rate, since depreciation can create inflationary spirals.

It is understanding inflation, not bond markets, that will set fiscal policy free.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down

News:

  • VRAY -12.9% (prices offering of 10.31 mln shares of common stock at $4.85 per share)
  • SRAC -11.9% (Momentus (merging with SRAC) reaffirms 2021 revs, but will delay January launch until further into 2021)
  • DPW -7.4% (Non-compliance notice from NYSE)
  • AHCO -5% (commences public offering of 8 mln shares of Class A Common Stock by co and selling shareholders)
  • GBIO -4.4% (stock offering)
  • NGM -4% (stock offering)
  • SBTX -3.9% (EcoR1 Capital discloses 7.3% stake)
  • PRLD -3.6% (stock offering)
  • FATE -2.2% (stock offering)
  • SIVB -1.9% (SIVB to acquire BPFH)
  • TRGP -1.6% (names new Chairman)

Analyst comments:

  • EGHT -4.6% (downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo)
  • FSLR -4.5% (downgraded to Sell from Buy at Goldman)
  • CSIQ -3.1% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman)
  • LESL -2.3% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at Loop Capital)
  • CREE -1.9% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan)
  • NTRS -1.6% (downgraded to Sell from Neutral at Goldman)
  • OKTA -1.5% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at Piper Sandler)
  • RPD -1.5% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at Piper Sandler)
  • BGS -1.4% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Credit Suisse)
  • CAG -1.4% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Credit Suisse)
  • DVA -1.2% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)
  • STT -1.2% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman)
  • HSBC -0.9% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at Investec)