Barrons : Rising Rates Are Killing Tech Stocks. Here Are 10 That Can Still Thriv

Rising Rates Are Killing Tech Stocks. Here Are 10 That Can Still Thrive.

In 2020, tech stock valuations were driven by FOMO—fear of missing out. Aggressive investors ignored signs of valuation excess, bidding up stocks with high revenue growth—like Zoom, Snowflake, DoorDash, and Airbnb. The GAAP strategy—growth at any price—resulted in expensive stocks, but FOMO kept them rallying.

But that was then. Ted Mortonson, technology strategist at investment bank Baird, thinks the new tech dynamic is FOGK—fear of getting killed. Let’s take a look at what’s happened and where investors can turn for shelter from the storm.

The sudden, broad stumble in tech stocks—the Nasdaq Composite is down 7% over the past two weeks—was ignited by rising interest rates. The yield on 10-year Treasury notes has jumped to 1.54%, from 0.93% at the beginning of the year. And the higher rates go, the more pressure there is on high-priced tech.

David Readerman, who runs Endurance Capital Partners, a San Francisco–based tech hedge fund, notes that the discounted terminal valuation of high-growth stocks gets marked down sharply in a rising-rate environment. That’s because the higher rates go, the less future profits are worth in today’s dollars.

Most at risk, he says, are companies with minimal cash flow and valuations tied to their perceived terminal value. That description fits much of the 2020 initial-public-offering class, particularly stocks like C3.ai (ticker: AI) and Snowflake (SNOW).

Last week, we listed 15 tech stocks trading for at least 35 times forward sales, including Snowflake and C3.ai. As of late Thursday, all 15 were down on the week, by an average of 12.6%.

The trouble isn’t simply higher rates. It’s how quickly they’ve spiked, according to Mortonson. Indications of inflation have pushed rates up faster than anyone anticipated.

“Higher input costs are evident across the board,” he wrote in an email.

Some of those costs stem from the tech industry itself, with rising demand for 5G handsets, PCs, cloud-based servers, and compute-heavy cars triggering widespread chip shortages. Auto makers have cut production for lack of parts, and PC makers don’t have enough chips to meet demand.

Mortonson thinks the prospect of a new $1.9 trillion stimulus package—now winding its way through Congress—strikes some investors as “adding lighter fluid to a raging bonfire.”

As a result, investors are dumping pricey tech stocks and moving into economically sensitive—and rate-sensitive—sectors like energy, financial services, industrial materials, and healthcare. Is the damage done? “Based on my 30 years of experience,” Mortonson wrote, “the answer is no.”

He added that Wall Street earnings models might not yet account for increased operating costs in the quarters ahead, including higher financing costs, increased component pricing, and the return of travel and entertainment budgets, among other factors.

Dell Technologies (DELL) CFO Tom Sweet warned investors last week that 2021 operating margins would drop from 2020 levels, in part due to the restoration of employee benefits withdrawn at the darkest months of the pandemic last spring. (Dell stock still rallied on its strong overall fourth-quarter results.)

“There is no real fear yet,” Mortonson said. “Investor panic must be felt to get to a real bottom.”

Readerman suggests that tech investors hide in “deep value.” He points to HP Inc. (HPQ), which last week posted fourth-quarter sales and profits that crushed Wall Street estimates. The PC and printer company bought back close to 5% of its market value in the most recent quarter alone, and it plans to keep right on buying—at least $1 billion a quarter. HP shares have more than doubled since last March.

Despite the rally, HP shares are still trading at under 10 times fiscal 2022 non-GAAP profits.

Mortonson is focused on companies with dominant positions and scale, along with balance sheets to invest in R&D. As bets on digital transformation, he suggests Accenture (ACN), the leading IT consulting and integration firm, and Twilio (TWLO), which provides a suite of communications tools to many websites.

Paul Meeks, portfolio manager of the Wireless Fund, likes semiconductor stocks, with chip supplies short even before the economic recovery has set in. He told me that memory-chip maker Micron Technology (MU)—featured in this column late last year—“still may be my best idea.”

The big opportunity might be in old-school technology—not just HP, but also Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), IBM (IBM), Cisco Systems (CSCO), Oracle (ORCL), and Seagate Technology (STX)—as information-technology spending picks up later in the year.

Of that group, all of the stocks trade below five times sales and 15 times earnings. The real irony is that these stocks, ignored in the 2020 FOMO rally, benefit from the same cloud trends that have driven the likes of Snowflake and C3.ai. The cloud isn’t water vapor—it’s filled with servers, disk drives, routers, and switches. And the companies that make that stuff are a whole lot cheaper than the cloud stocks themselves.

Barrons : Utilities Offer Yield and a Way to Play Green Energy. And Their Stocks

Utilities Offer Yield and a Way to Play Green Energy. And Their Stocks Are Cheap.

A squat power plant with smokestacks may not be what environmentally conscious investors have in mind when they go looking for stocks. Yet electric utilities are at the center of a seismic shift away from coal and toward wind and solar power over the next 15 years. That is expected to be a huge boon to both the environment and investors—and utility company stocks and funds are a cheap way to plug into this critically important transition.

By the next decade, clean power sources such as wind and solar are projected to provide 39% of the U.S. utility industry’s generating capacity, versus 13% today, while coal is forecast to account for just 3%, versus 19% now, according to Morgan Stanley analyst Stephen Byrd. He sees natural gas, now the dominant source of electricity generation, falling to 28% by 2030 from 40%. As a result, the industry’s carbon emissions could decline by 60% from 2020 to 2030.

“Everybody wins,” Byrd says. “The air is cleaner, utility bills are lower, and shareholders benefit in a big way.”


Many investors are overlooking this bright green opportunity. The $500 billion utility sector has badly trailed the overall stock market of late. The largest exchange-traded fund of utility stocks, the Utilities Select Sector SPDR (ticker: XLU), returned negative 10% in the past year compared with a 24% return for the S&P 500 index. Defensive sectors like utilities have been out of favor, as investors gravitate to industries like energy and financials that will more directly benefit from an improving economy.

In the coming years, utilities—now yielding an average of 3.5%—are likely to have annual earnings growth of 5% to 8%. Those results will be driven by heavy investment in renewable-energy sources, batteries and other power-storage devices, new transmission lines, and investments to harden the electrical grid to help avoid blackouts and breakdowns—a need strikingly evident in the recent freeze that nearly collapsed the grid in Texas.


All of this could translate into 10% annual total returns, which would be competitive with the S&P 500 and much better than those in the bond market, where Treasuries and municipals yield just 1% to 2%.

“Utilities are a stealth green-energy play, with much lower valuations than most alternative-energy providers and less risk,” says Hugh Wynne, co-head of utilities and renewable energy research at SSR, an independent research consulting firm.

Investors can play the sector through companies such as American Electric Power (AEP), Dominion Energy (D), Entergy (ETR), Exelon (EXC), and industry leader NextEra Energy (NEE), which has built a large and lucrative renewable-energy business.

In addition to the Utilities Select SPDR fund, another ETF focused on power companies is Vanguard Utilities (VPU). The two ETFs have similar holdings, returns, and current yields of 3.3%. The top three stocks in both funds are NextEra, Duke Energy (DUK), and Southern Co. (SO).

Reaves Utility Income (UTG), a $1.8 billion closed-end fund, is trading at a small premium to its net asset value. It has about half of its assets in electric utilities, with the rest in cable TV, telecom, and other sectors.

Utilities will play a pivotal role in the economy’s electrification over the next two decades, as more Americans adopt electric cars and light trucks and use electricity for heating and cooking, replacing oil and natural gas.


“The conventional view is that you need to buy go-go technology companies or renewables developers to participate in the energy transition,” says George Bilicic, the vice chairman of investment banking at Lazard and head of the firm’s power, energy, and infrastructure group. “But the most efficient and optimal risk-adjusted manner to participate in the energy transition is through well-run electric utilities.”

The Biden administration’s green initiatives should reinforce the trend toward renewable energy that is being driven by the states, utilities’ main regulators. Many, notably California, have aggressive green-energy targets.

All of this could capture the attention of the growing legion of socially responsible investors, as the utility industry undergoes a huge reduction in its carbon footprint.

“This is as good an opportunity for utilities as I’ve seen in my career,” says John Bartlett, president of Reaves Asset Management, which runs the Reaves Utility Income fund. “The industry hasn’t been able to grow like this since the 1950s and 1960s.”

Utilities were a growth industry in the postwar period as a result of brisk economic expansion, migration to the suburbs, and the widespread adoption of air conditioning. Now, their time is back, but their stocks are still relatively inexpensive.

Electric utilities trade for an average of 18 times projected 2021 earnings. That is a discount to the S&P 500’s about 23 times, although not a bargain. Investors, however, should view them as relatively low-risk stocks with less volatility than the overall market and as appealing substitutes for bonds.

“Utilities look exceptionally attractive relative to fixed-income investments,” says Morgan Stanley’s Byrd.

Utilities’ current yield of about 3.5% is slightly higher than that on Baa-rated corporate bonds. In contrast, over the past decade, utility shares, on average, yielded about 1.5 percentage points less than bonds.

Bilicic calls the industry’s current valuations “nonsensical,” given its growth outlook, and says that it would take a sharp rise in interest rates to dent the stocks’ appeal.

Some environmentally conscious investors might recoil at investing in the likes of American Electric Power, Duke Energy, or CMS Energy (CMS)—which still produce a meaningful portion of their electricity from coal. But investors should look at where the industry is going, rather than where it is.

Current utility carbon emissions total about 1,450 million metric tons annually, or about a quarter of the total in the U.S. Industry emissions could drop to 580 million tons by 2030, according to Morgan Stanley’s Byrd. That would help the U.S. meet or exceed international carbon-reduction targets—a Biden administration goal.

Indeed, given its large size, the utility sector “may be the best expression of decarbonization for investors,” argues J.P. Morgan analyst Jeremy Tonet.

Coal, for one, is on its way out. “There is not a regulated coal plant in this country that is economic today,” said NextEra CEO Jim Robo in January.

Today, California utilities have the cleanest generating capacity. A nearby table from J.P. Morgan shows 13 utilities ranked by their current green status and the expected rate of change in the coming years.

“A lot of folks are interested in impact investing—in making their investments make a difference,” says Reaves Asset Management’s Bartlett. “One of the wonderful things about utilities is that you’re helping them raise money to clean up the environment.”

Utilities rely on bond and equity financing to fund heavy capital spending programs. They don’t retain a lot of earnings, given their dividend payout ratios, which average about 65%.

Yet as capital spending ramps up, so do utility profits. Regulators allow utilities to earn a 9% to 10% return on their equity, and that equity grows with new investment.

The industry is expected to spend about $130 billion annually on renewable sources of energy, storage and transmission facilities, and electricity distribution networks in 2021, 2022, and potentially longer, up 50% from the level a decade ago.


These outlays should drive industry earnings growth at a healthy annual clip of 5% to 8% for the coming years and possibly for the entire decade. Dividends are expected to rise in line with profits.

Residential electricity rates, which rose at just a 1% annual pace in the past decade, could increase at about 2.5% yearly in the 2020s—paralleling expected inflation—as utilities earn a return on their heavy investments.

“We see structural decarbonization, robust growth opportunities, a defensive business model, and solid yield underpinning an attractive outlook for the group,” J.P. Morgan’s Tonet wrote in late 2020, adding that the combination created a “compelling risk/reward.”

One fan of the sector is Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, a subsidiary of Berkshire (BRK.B), owns a group of U.S. utilities and is one of the largest wind-power producers in the country.

There are risks, to be sure. Utilities are sensitive to interest rates, and bond yields have lately been climbing, although the prospect of higher rates seems to be already priced into the stocks.

In the wake of the Texas debacle, some politicians have questioned whether the electrical grid can maintain reliability as it becomes more dependent on wind and solar power. There is also skepticism over whether the transition to renewable energy can continue without government tax credits and subsidies.


Then there is the danger of adverse moves by state regulatory commissions and the difficulties in getting approval for new wind and solar sites. There are also the challenges of developing better battery and other storage technology that will be important to the growth of renewable-energy sources.

Even in Blue states, where many residents are focused on climate change, there has been opposition to offshore wind developments. This has already delayed wind farms off the coast of Cape Cod in Massachusetts and the Hamptons on New York’s Long Island.

Opponents have included environmentalists, fishing interests, and the wealthy (some of whom object to the view of wind turbines on the horizon). In the tony Hamptons enclave of Wainscott, residents have objected to power lines running underneath a popular beach.

Costs for wind-generated electricity are declining, however, as prices of wind turbines are sinking, making wind an irresistibly cheaper option than coal or natural gas in many parts of the country. Increasingly, solar power also offers competitive prices.


Indeed, wind has become the cheapest source of power, especially in the nation’s mid-continental wind belt, which runs south from North Dakota through Nebraska and into Texas.

“North America has one of the great onshore wind resources in the world,” Bartlett says. North America is one of the few continents with land stretching from a pole to the tropics. This creates wide temperature and barometric pressure swings that produce wind. There is also plenty of wind off the East Coast, and many utilities, including Dominion, are seeking to tap that from projects anchored in the Atlantic Ocean.

Morgan Stanley’s Byrd says that some investors are skeptical that renewable energy makes economic sense without subsidies. They also question whether it can provide the necessary reliability when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun isn’t shining.

a kilowatt-hour, compared with the cash operating cost of four to five cents for coal plants.
But it’s easy to argue for the economics of renewable energy, he says. The all-in cost of electricity from a wind farm in the middle of the U.S. is about one to two cents a kilowatt-hour, much lower than the cash operating cost of four to five cents for coal plants.

Solar, he notes, is increasingly attractive in the sunnier parts of the country. Solar’s all-in costs of 2.5 to 4.5 cents a kilowatt-hour are comparable to or lower than those of natural gas.

“Even if tax credits for renewables were to expire in the mid-2020s and not be further extended by Congress (and the outlook is just the opposite, in our view), the annual cost declines we forecast would result in wind and solar power continuing to be the cheapest forms of power generation in the U.S.,” Byrd wrote in February.

Investors benefit from the shift to wind and solar because these energy sources, while capital-intensive, have scant operating costs. Plus, utilities earn a return on invested assets. In contrast, old coal plants are largely depreciated, thus earning low returns, and are costly to operate.

Critics argue, however, that heavy use of wind and solar power could impair the reliability of the electrical grid.

Byrd acknowledges that serious storage facilities will be needed, but says their costs will decline. However, most current storage systems are better suited to intraday use than for sustained demand over a number of days. Utilities might need to maintain natural-gas-powered backup systems to prevent outages.

SSR’s Wynne believes that conventional power sources, along with storage, can make “high levels of renewable energy” viable for about 75% of the nation’s total electricity needs, although getting to 100% would be “prohibitively expensive.” His view is that gas-fired plants will continue to play a crucial backstop role.

Investors will notice a divide in the utility sector: The stocks of companies with the greatest exposure to renewable energy generally carry the highest valuations. With that in mind, here are some stocks that Wall Street likes:

NextEra Energy is the industry leader, with top-tier management, the largest renewable-energy portfolio in the country, and the best-run utility, Florida Power & Light.

The stock, trading recently at $74, or 30 times projected 2021 profits, has the highest valuation among its peers by a wide margin and a market value of $145 billion, more than twice that of No. 2 Duke Energy.

A confident NextEra management projects annual earnings growth of 6% to 8% over the next few years, noting in a recent presentation that it would be “disappointed” if it were “not able to deliver financial results at or near the top end” of its expected earnings-per-share ranges through 2023.

Byrd favors American Electric Power, which he calls a “coal-heavy company that is moving away from that in a big way,” aided by favorable wind conditions in its territories. The utility, operating in the Midwest and Texas, generates 43% of its power from coal, but plans to cut that to 24% by 2030 while expanding its use of renewable-energy sources to 39% from 18%.

The stock, recently around $76, is down 20% in the past year, trades for 16 times projected 2021 earnings, and yields 3.9%. The company sees EPS growth of 5% to 7% in the coming years. Byrd says that American Electric Power’s valuation could rise as its transformation continues.

AEP is following the lead of another Midwestern utility, Xcel Energy (XEL), which is further along in its transition to renewable energy and fetches a higher valuation. Xcel, at about $60, trades for 20 times projected 2021 earnings and yields 3.1%. The company, favored by SSR’s Wynne, is considered to be one of the better-run utilities in the U.S.

Chicago-based Exelon is one of the country’s largest utilities, with regulated operations in Illinois (home to probably its best-known unit, Commonwealth Edison), Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and other states. Exelon sees earnings growth of 6% to 8% annually at its regulated utility business through 2024.

This past week, the company announced that it would spin off its deregulated power business, which has the largest fleet of nuclear reactors in the U.S. The stock, at about $39, trades for 14 times projected 2021 earnings and yields 3.9%.

CMS Energy is favored by Reaves Asset Management’s Bartlett, who says it is “cleaning up its emissions, while holding increases in electric bills to around the rate of inflation.”

The company, which gets about 20% of its electricity from coal, plans to stop using that fuel by 2040, as it expands its renewable-energy portfolio, mostly wind. The stock, at about $55, trades for 19 times projected 2021 earnings and yields 3.2%. The company sees earnings growth of 6% to 8% annually in the coming years, helped by favorable regulation in its home state of Michigan.

Alliant Energy (LNT) is another Midwestern utility moving to renewable energy from coal. With operations in Iowa and Wisconsin, the company sees annual growth of 5% to 7% in earnings per share through 2024. Its stock, trading around $47, changes hands for about 18.5 times projected 2021 earnings and yields 3.4%.

Dominion, with operations in Virginia and the Carolinas, is focused on its regulated electricity business after selling its natural-gas pipeline business to Berkshire Hathaway’s utility division in 2020 and cutting its dividend by 33%. The stock, recently around $71, trades for about 18 times estimated 2021 earnings and yields 3.6%. It sees 6.5% annual growth in earnings in the coming years.

Dominion generates the vast majority of its power from gas and nuclear, but it is moving heavily into renewable energy, with plans for the largest offshore wind farm in North America, 27 miles off Virginia’s coast. J.P. Morgan’s Tonet calls the company a “best-in-class, pure-play regulated utility with attractive green growth plans.” He has a $87 price target on the shares.

Tonet also likes Entergy, which owns a group of utilities along the Gulf Coast. The stock, at about $88, trades for 15 times estimated 2021 earnings, a discount to the sector, and yields 4.3%. The company expects annual earnings growth of 5% to 7% in the next few years. Tonet sees Entergy shares garnering a higher valuation as it winds down an independent power business. The Indian Point 3 nuclear plant north of New York City, owned by Entergy, is due to shut down this spring. Entergy also has one of the best hydrogen logistics networks on the Gulf Coast, and that could become valuable as hydrogen usage grows.

“We believe that the market underappreciates the company’s fully regulated business model and green growth potential, given the long generation investment runway,” Tonet wrote. He has a price target of $121 on the stock, up 37% from recent levels.

Pinnacle West Capital (PNW), which operates Arizona Public Service, the state’s largest utility, is a turnaround story. It has pledged to generate more consistent financial results and improve its relationship with state regulators. SSR’s Wynne likes the stock, which has been trading around $73, or an inexpensive 15 times projected 2021 earnings. The yield is 4.6%

In sum, the greening of America has become a major investment theme, and utilities offer an overlooked yet attractive and defensive play on it.

>>> US Close Dow -1.50% S&P -0.48% Nasdaq +0.56% Russell +0.04%

Closing Stock Market Summary

The S&P 500 decreased 0.5% on Friday in a mostly negative session. A modest bounce in the growth stocks lifted the Nasdaq Composite (+0.6%) to a positive close, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.5% amid weakness in many of its value-oriented components. The Russell 2000 (+0.04%) finished little changed. 

Long-term interest rates pulled back today, which provided some relief for the mega-cap/growth stocks within the S&P 500 information technology (+0.6%), consumer discretionary (+0.6%), and communication services (+0.03%) sectors. Demand for Treasuries was attributed to technical factors and month-end rebalancing. 

The 10-yr yield decreased six basis points to 1.46%. The 2-yr yield decreased three basis points to 0.13%. The U.S. Dollar Index rose 0.9% to 90.92. 

The retracement in yields, however, didn't translate to a risk-on mindset. The other eight S&P 500 sectors closed in negative territory, including the energy (-2.3%) and financials (-2.0%) sectors at the bottom of the pack with 2% declines. In addition, declining issues outpaced advancing issues at the NYSE and Nasdaq. 

Energy and financial stocks were burdened by lower oil prices ($61.45/bbl, -2.02, -3.2%) and the curve-flattening activity in the Treasury market. Value stocks, in general, faced profit-taking interest after a strong month that saw the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD 143.42, -1.86, -1.3%) rise 6.0%, versus the 2.6% monthly gain in the S&P 500.

Interestingly, the S&P 500 briefly fell below its 50-day moving average (3809) early in the morning. The ability to attract buyers below the key technical level was viewed as an encouraging sign for bullish investors, although follow-through buying was meek and sellers regained control of the market into the close. The S&P 500 still closed above this level. 

Salesforce (CRM 216.50, -14.58, -6.3%) was an additional drag on the Dow despite reporting better-than-expected earnings results and providing upbeat guidance. CRM shares fell 6%.

Separately, the Personal Income and Spending Report for January revealed muted inflation pressure and a personal savings rate of 20.5%, suggesting that even before another round of stimulus checks, households have the potential to drive further economic growth.

Reviewing Friday's economic data:

  • Personal income, bolstered by government social benefits, soared 10.0% m/m in January (consensus 9.7%). Personal spending increased 2.4% m/m (consensus +2.3%). The PCE Price Index and Core PCE Price Index, which excludes food and energy, were both up 0.3%. That left yr/yr price changes at 1.5% (from 1.3% in December) and 1.5% (from 1.4% in December), respectively.
    • The key takeaway from the report is twofold: (1) it shows aggregate inflation pressures were still tame in January and (2) the report exposes the potential for a major pickup in spending by way of a personal savings rate that stands at 20.5% as a percentage of disposable personal income (and that's before the next round of stimulus checks get sent out)!
  • The final reading for the February University of Michigan Index of Consumer Sentiment was revised up to 76.8 (consensus 76.4) from the preliminary reading of 76.2. The final February reading was below the final reading of 79.0 for January.
    • The key takeaway from the report is that the downturn in February was driven by views on future economic prospects among households with incomes below $75,000. Another key takeaway, though, is that the year ahead inflation rate was expected to be 3.3% versus 3.0% in January and 2.5% in December.
  • The Chicago PMI for February decreased to 59.5 (consensus 60.0) from an unrevised 63.8 in December.
  • The Advance report for International Trade in Goods for January showed a deficit of $83.7 billion versus $83.2 billion in December. The Advance report for Retail Inventories for January decreased 0.6%, while the Advance report for Wholesale Inventories for January increased 1.3%.

Looking ahead, investors will receive ISM Manufacturing Index for February, Construction Spending for January, and the final IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI for February on Monday.

  • Russell 2000 +11.5% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite +2.4% YTD
  • S&P 500 +1.5% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +1.1% YTD

FT : Neumann agrees to 50% reduction in SoftBank settlement over WeWork

Neumann agrees to 50% reduction in SoftBank settlement over WeWork
End to legal battle with co-founder of shared office provider opens path to market listing

Adam Neumann has agreed to a 50 per cent reduction on the payout he will receive from WeWork’s largest investor SoftBank, ending a legal battle and paving the way for the shared office provider to go public.

SoftBank said on Friday it had entered a settlement agreement with Neumann and two WeWork board directors, who had sued SoftBank over the Japanese group’s reluctance to execute a $3bn tender offer it promised as part of a rescue package for the company.

The agreement comes 18 months after a botched initial public offering that brought WeWork to the brink of bankruptcy, following a series of high-profile blunders that led to Neumann’s resignation as chief executive.

Under the terms of the deal, SoftBank would spend $1.5bn to purchase shares from Neumann, WeWork employees and other investors in the company, including the venture group Benchmark Capital, according to people briefed on the matter. Neumann can sell up to $500m in shares in the deal.

SoftBank had initially planned to purchase double that amount as part of a multibillion-dollar rescue package in October 2019 but later reneged on the tender offer, claiming WeWork had failed to meet a set of conditions behind the rescue deal.

Marcelo Claure, executive chairman of WeWork, said the settlement was “the result of all parties coming to the table for the sake of doing what is best for the future of WeWork”.

Settling the dispute with Neumann was critical for allowing WeWork to potentially merge with a listed blank cheque company that would allow it to trade on public markets, said a person with direct knowledge of the matter. 

SoftBank is currently in talks with BowX Acquisition, a special purpose acquisition company that raised $420m in an IPO in August, about a merger that could value WeWork between $8bn and $10bn, said people familiar with the matter.

The talks have been active for several weeks, and a deal could be announced soon, although one person involved in the negotiations said WeWork could still opt to go public through a traditional IPO or a direct listing.

The new valuation would be a far cry from the $47bn mark WeWork hit in a round of financing it secured before the company faced criticism from investors over its huge losses, governance matters and revelations that Neumann was personally benefiting from a series of deals. 

Neumann would have no role in the running of WeWork, nor would he have a seat on the company’s board of directors, said people briefed on the settlement. However, he would retain most of his stake in the company. 

FT : UK government to take stakes in tech start-ups

UK government to take stakes in tech start-ups
Up to £375m of state funds to be matched by venture capital and made available for promising companies

Rishi Sunak is preparing to launch a fund that would channel up to £375m into fast growing UK tech companies that could leave the taxpayer with stakes in dozens of start-ups.

The new initiative, called “Future Fund: Breakthrough”, could be announced as early as the Budget on Wednesday, according to three people close to the situation.

The tech sector will be a major focus in the Budget, with policies, such as a new tech visa to help attract skilled workers, expected to stimulate investment and provide support for entrepreneurs.

The Chancellor’s new vehicle would see government funds matched by private sector venture capital, according to tech executives and Whitehall officials.

It is intended to support potentially world-beating tech companies that need to scale up to the next stage of development, one said. These groups are typically still loss making, owing to the need for extensive investment in research and development. 

Tech founders have raised concerns that British businesses sometimes fail to make the next leap in their development, instead selling out to overseas rivals before they reach their potential.

The Sunak fund will risk taxpayer money going into companies that fail because the majority of start ups lose money for their backers. Only a few become global leaders.

Sunak, who was a hedge fund investor before entering politics, has used Treasury funds to invest more than £1bn in 1,000 start-ups across the UK through an initiative called the Future Fund. This scheme, which was part of the Covid-19 business support programme, offered convertible loans to lossmaking start-ups struggling to raise funds in the pandemic matched by private investors. The loans can convert into equity stakes. 

Several businesses have already converted the debt into equity, including a toilet maker based in Basildon. 

The new Future Fund: Breakthrough would be aimed at later stage businesses with established business models, rather than seeking to bail out Covid-hit start-ups.

The Treasury declined to comment.

Each investment would be tens of millions of pounds and matched by private sector funds, meaning that the fund would probably be left with stakes in a small number of larger companies than the Future Fund.

Sunak is a keen proponent of private-public co-investment schemes and is talking to United Arab Emirates-based sovereign wealth fund, Mubadala, about backing a new life sciences fund.

Officials are also drawing up proposals for a co-investment scheme in the energy sector.

Sunak is expected to use the Budget to signal future increases in corporation tax in the coming years; from the current rate of 19 per cent to as much as 25 per cent.

At the same time the chancellor will signal the importance of investment and has been considering new tax breaks for entrepreneurs that could include higher capital allowances, according to officials. 

The government’s more daring approach to the tech sector under Boris Johnson has been demonstrated by its plans for a new £800m agency called Aria to back “high risk, high-reward” scientific research, loosely based on the US “ARPA” agency.

That higher-risk appetite for taxpayers’ money was reflected last year when the administration put $500m into OneWeb, a bankrupt satellite operator.

The Kalifa report into the fintech sector commissioned by the Treasury, on Friday recommended changes to the listing regime to attract more founder-led businesses to list on the London Stock Exchange, alongside a new tech fund that would help pension funds take a bigger role in the tech sector.

A report next week from Lord Jonathan Hill is expected to support changes to the listings regime to make the UK globally competitive.

Separately, Sunak will set out the details of his long-awaited UK Infrastructure Bank, which is designed to replace investment provided before Brexit through the European Investment Bank.

The new bank will have an initial base of £12bn made up of a mix of £5bn of taxpayer equity and £7bn of borrowing. In addition, it will be able to issue £10bn of government guarantees, officials said on Saturday.

FT : Buffett warns of ‘bleak future’ for debt investors

Buffett warns of ‘bleak future’ for debt investors
‘Bonds are not the place to be these days’ Berkshire Hathaway chief tells shareholders in his annual letter

Warren Buffett warned that debt investors faced a “bleak future” days after a sell-off pummelled government bonds and sent reverberations through global stock markets.

The 90-year-old chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway told shareholders in his closely followed annual letter that it was best to eschew the fixed-income market, in which the company is itself a large player.

“Fixed-income investors worldwide — whether pension funds, insurance companies or retirees — face a bleak future,” he wrote. “Competitors, for both regulatory and credit-rating reasons, must focus on bonds. And bonds are not the place to be these days.”

Treasury prices slid dramatically last week, driven by shifts from investors who see faster economic growth taking hold. Optimism around a global expansion has also rekindled concerns about a spike in inflation, however nascent, and the prospect that central banks may have to adjust their stimulative policies.

Many investors had moved to adjust their portfolios before the sell-off in Treasuries this week, buying lower-quality debt that offered higher returns. Buffett warned on Saturday that the move by insurers and bond buyers to “juice the pathetic returns now available by shifting their purchases to obligations backed by shaky borrowers” was a concern.

“Risky loans, however, are not the answer to inadequate interest rates,” he said. “Three decades ago, the once-mighty savings and loan industry destroyed itself, partly by ignoring that maxim.”

The downbeat assessment of the sovereign debt market accompanied Berkshire’s fourth-quarter results, which showed the company’s net profit rose nearly 23 per cent from a year prior to $35.8bn, or $23,015 per class A share.

The rise was propelled by gains on investment and derivative bets, as the broader US stock market advanced in the final three months of 2020. Accounting rules require Berkshire to report changes in the value of its stock investments in companies such as Apple, Coca-Cola and Verizon as part of its quarterly earnings, resulting in big swings depending on the direction of the market.

Berkshire’s underlying businesses showed some resilience towards the end of this past year, with its operating earnings rising just under 14 per cent. For the full year, which included the fallout from the coronavirus crisis, operating earnings fell 9 per cent from a year prior to $21.9bn.

Buffett directed much of the company’s firepower in the fourth quarter to buying back Berkshire shares, spending $8.8bn on its own stock. For the full year, it repurchased $24.7bn worth of its shares. The share buybacks helped reduce Berkshire’s mammoth cash pile from $145.7bn at the end of September to $138.3bn by year end.

The doyen of the investment world used his annual letter to reaffirm his belief in the US economy, telling shareholders that the country had “moved forward” and that they should “never bet against America”.

While he has in the past weighed in on the direction of the country and supported Hillary Clinton’s campaign bid in 2016, he did not address the election of Joe Biden to the White House and only fleetingly mentioned the rift in the country that was laid bare over the past four years.

Buffett said progress towards “a more perfect union” had been “slow, uneven and often discouraging”. But he added that the country would continue to march ahead.

“In its brief 232 years of existence, however, there has been no incubator for unleashing human potential like America,” he wrote. “Despite some severe interruptions, our country’s economic progress has been breathtaking.”

Barrons : Online Retailer Asos Is Expanding. Why the Stock Could Be in Fashion N

Online Retailer Asos Is Expanding. Why the Stock Could Be in Fashion Now.

Shares in U.K. online fashion and cosmetics giant Asos fell 7.1% in the final three months of 2020, to 45.78 pounds sterling ($62.70), over fears that earnings would take a hit from a slump in demand for its signature partywear collections.

Instead, Asos, which sells 85,000 products from top brands and its own collections, benefited from being the online destination for shoppers who have been stuck at home during the pandemic. Consumers switched to purchasing more casual wear, sports gear, and beauty products in an attempt to improve their appearance on video calls.

Sales at the London-based company (ticker: ASC.UK) jumped 23% over the final four months of 2020. The stock has since recovered to £57.78, and is up 18% this year.

Granted, there’s still a danger that shoppers will flock to bricks-and-mortar stores when the Covid-19 crisis subsides. But the inventory levels at Asos remain healthy, while store-based rivals might have to play catch-up in terms of ordering or replenishing products.

Asos has been one of the U.K.’s fastest-growing retailers, and the pace looks set to continue. The company has carved out a niche catering to the fashion-conscious 20-something market, and has state-of-the-art fulfillment centers in the U.K., U.S., and Germany.

There are plans for further international expansion, with a new distribution hub in the U.K. and the addition of robotics at its site in Atlanta, Ga. In February, Asos bought the popular apparel brands Topshop, Topman, Miss Selfridge, and HIIT for $405 million, and will be closing stores.

Michael Benedict, an analyst at Berenberg, has forecast that the stock could rise 17.7%, to £68. “Asos’s strongest-ever balance sheet looks to have left it well positioned to capitalize immediately upon any lifting of lockdown restrictions,” he wrote in a note, adding that the company’s international warehouses will help drive “significant global growth.”

Anne Critchlow, an analyst at Société Générale, is targeting an even higher share price, at £70. Covid has boosted the online apparel market, she said in a note, “which we see only partially reversing when physical stores reopen, leaving the online retailers with some scale-related permanent margin gains.”

Asos has a market value of £5.6 billion, employs 3,824 people, and has 23 million active customers—which means they make purchases. The company has a multiple of 33.3 times this year’s expected earnings and is valued at a discount to its peers. Pretax profit was £142 million for the year ended Aug. 31, 2020, a substantial increase from £33.1 million the previous year. It had sales of £3.2 billion.

Chief Executive Officer Nick Beighton told Barron’s in a statement, “We are very excited about the opportunities ahead as we continue to deliver our multibrand platform strategy.”

The business started in 2000 selling clothing that mimicked items worn by celebrities on television and in movies—the derivation of its original name, As Seen On Screen. It floated on the London market a year later, and a year after that changed its name to Asos, shifting its strategy to selling its own clothing collections and top brands.

“Asos clearly has confidence in its future,” Chloe Collins, an analyst at research firm Global Data, wrote in a note, pointing to the announcement last week that Asos invested £90 million in a fourth fulfillment center in the U.K., creating 2,000 jobs.

“This will allow Asos to continue its growth trajectory without compromising on its delivery speed and efficiency, which contribute so much to its success,” she said.

>>> Barron’s Weekend Summary: The energy sector will move away from coal toward

Barron’s Weekend Summary: The energy sector will move away from coal toward wind and solar power during the next 15 years, benefiting utilities

* Cover Story: Electric utilities are at the center of a seismic shift away from coal and toward wind and solar power that will occur during the next 15 years, and by the next decade, clean power sources are projected to provide 39 percent of the US utility sector’s generating capacity, a huge boon to both the environment and investors—and utility company stocks and funds are a cheap way to plug into this critically important transition; 12 ways to play the sector include LNT, AEP, CMS, D, ETR, EXC, NEE, PNW, XEL, XLU, VPU, and UTG.

* Tech Trader: Rising interest rates are putting a dent in tech stocks, though it isn’t simply a matter of higher rates, it’s how quickly they’ve spiked, says Ted Mortonson of Baird, who believes the prospect of a $1.9T stimulus package could add fuel to the fire; Tech investors may want to look at HPQ, CAN, TWLO, MU, HPE, IBM, CSCO, ORCL, and STX, all of which trade below five times sales and 15 times earnings.

* Trader: Positive on DOW: “Everything is breaking right for chemical company Dow, but market analysts have failed to notice—and this is one time when investors can get in ahead of Wall Street”; Investors don’t have to doubt the Fed to be worried about the possibility of rising interest rates—just consider the amount of money heading into the economy, which is likely to boost growth far beyond anything the US has experienced since the late 1980s.

* Interview: John Rogers is the founder of Ariel Investments, the first minority-owned mutual fund company and still only one of a few; The $15B firm has long been a value-oriented shop with an eye toward companies that have strong management and are good corporate citizens, a successful strategy for decades (picks: KMT, MSGE, LAZ, MSGN, MDP, MAT, NVST, MTN, BOKF).

* Profile: Murray Rosenblith and David Schoenwald, co-managers of the New Alternatives fund, invest mainly in alternative-energy stocks; With the rise of socially responsible investing—and now that climate change has become a force that Wall Street must reckon with—their sector has finally caught fire (top 10 holdings: BEPC, HASI, DEP Renovaveis, Orsted, NEP, ENEL, Iberdrola, Vestas Wind Systems, TransAlta Renewables, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy).

* Features: 1) Positive on C: Story looks at how incoming chief Jane Fraser can improve the bank, and how she can continue to improve what the firm already does well, such as payments, which along with its card business and treasury and trade solutions group provides cash-management services that drive strong revenues; The bank will also need to shed businesses that can’t compete efficiently, and stop trying to be everything to all people; 2) Barron’s list of the Best Online Brokers for 2021 consists of Interactive Brokers, Fidelity, TD Ameritrade, E*Trade, SCHW, tastyworks, Merrill Edge, SogoTrade, TradeStation, Ally Invest, and TradingBlock; 3) Positive on ROST: The retailer took a hit during the pandemic because it has little online presence, and its stores were shuttered during lockdowns, which went hand-in-hand with weak consumer appetite for nearly all clothing outside leisure wear—but the company increasingly appears to be a “hidden gem,” and its geographic exposure could spark a strong recovery by 2022.

* European Trader: Positive on Asos: The UK online fashion and cosmetics giant, which sells products from top brands and its own collections, benefited from being the online destination for shoppers who have been stuck at home during the pandemic; It is one of Britain’s fastest-growing retailers, and the pace looks set to continue.

* Emerging Markets: Optimism about Brazil has hinged on the assumption that president Jair Bolsonaro would stick to his pet social issues and leave economic policy to finance minister Paulo Guedes, but Bolsonaro’s move to fire the chief executive of PBR is dashing hopes of a return to economic orthodoxy.

* Commodities: Strength in oil prices may encourage producers to consider lifting output—the biggest incentive for the OPEC and its Russia-led allies, collectively known as OPEC+, to raise production will be the need to “take advantage of the high-priced oil,” says Stan Bharti of Forbes & Manhattan.

* Streetwise: Catherine Wood, who runs ARK Innovation, an ETF that returned 152 percent last year, is bullish on TSLA, saying the cost of making batteries will plunge, eventually making electric cars cheaper than gasoline ones, while Tesla also has a big head start in autonomous vehicles; She is also bullish on Bitcoin, based on Arthur Laffer’s notion that the cryptocurrency meets all the requirements of money.