WWD : Coherence Is the Real Luxury for Executives at Watches and Wonders 2026

Coherence Is the Real Luxury for Executives at Watches and Wonders 2026
What might see the industry through is a watch that is credible by all accounts, fairly priced, transparently made — and keeping it one piece short of demand.

GENEVA – The watchmaking industry finds itself in a paradoxical position.

Rarely has it been more visible, rife with history and players of all sizes ready to flex their design or innovation muscles as the 2026 edition of Watches and Wonders opened on April 14.

Yet in the plush avenues of the fair, watchmaking executives were cautious, keenly aware gleaming prospects could fast turn brittle against a backdrop of renewed geopolitical flashpoints, macroeconomic uncertainties — and a consumer base far more informed and demanding than ever.

Still, the industry looked forward and upward in this annual rendezvous that reiterated its global reach. The 65 exhibiting brands, which included industry heavyweights Rolex, Patek Philippe and now Audemars Piguet, hailed from Switzerland as well as France, Germany, the U.K. and even China.

The roster could still “grow a bit, but not too much,” for Matthieu Humair, chief executive officer of the Watches and Wonders Foundation that organizes the event.

Some 60,000 visitors, up from 55,000 last year, were expected to have visited the Palexpo exhibition center by the time the doors closed on April 20, Humair told WWD midway through the fair. All visitor categories were up around 9 percent, including a tally of 6,000 retailers, organizers later confirmed. Online, the reach topped 900 million.

On day four, Humair noted that the Middle East contingent remained stable, despite travel and other disruptions due to the ongoing war.

Interest from younger generations continued to be strong, with an average visitor age of 35 and 25 percent of tickets sold to people below 25. “A watch now is a mechanical, a cultural object that goes from one generation to another and it becomes something very unique, and young people are looking for that,” said Humair.

It reinforced the importance of Watches and Wonders as “the place to unite the industry, to meet also the men and women who design, who draw the watches, the watchmakers,” he said. “Young people are looking for that connection.”

A Case for Balance
With the Middle East as vital to watchmakers as it is volatile, the industry had the region top of mind going into the fair.

There were also encouraging signs. “We were wondering if Middle Eastern [visitors] would be coming,” said Zenith CEO Benoît de Clerck. “They’re all here — more [numerous] than last year, and they’re buying.”

Still, the first effects of the war in Iran and its repercussions through the region could be felt.

Swiss watch export figures, which came out on April 21, showed that while shipments to the United Arab Emirates showed a modest 0.7 percent uptick to 90.5 million Swiss francs in March, Saudi Arabia dropped 16.1 percent and Qatar slumped 24.8 percent, although their sizes remain modest at 21.9 million and 16 million Swiss francs respectively.

There may yet be a run-on effect from the war on other markets, with Bremont’s CEO Davide Cerrato pointing out that “with everything that happens around the world, the flows of tourists switch off — you can imagine that the Middle Eastern ones have completely disappeared.” However, the U.K.-based watchmaker is little exposed to the region, where it is present with leading luxury watch retailer Ahmed Seddiqi.

Hermès, which reported sales for the three months to March 31, saw its watch division slip 3.7 percent. According to Hermès International’s executive vice president, manufacturing division and equity investments Guillaume de Seynes, there was on one hand exposure to China, which is yet to pick up strongly for luxury players.

On the other, the tipping point was the toll on March sales of the developing situation in the Middle East, “a very interesting zone” with “very dynamic” clientele that had “become a reservoir” of growth for the French company, he told WWD.

Meanwhile, a year after the shock announcement of sweeping tariffs and subsequent see-sawing on what levy would be applied to Swiss-made goods, the U.S. remains a land of opportunity for watchmakers.

By this time next year, it’s likely to be the top market for Bremont. Growth there is in “very, very high double-digit numbers” and Cerrato said the watchmaker was looking to have much more distribution by building up its American retailer network.

Rewards are even greater for those who have played the long game.

Karl-Friedrich Scheufele, copresident of Chopard, said it was “very encouraging to see that the U.S. has really developed very well in the past two years,” driven by intimate events with collectors.

Japan and “quite a few countries in Europe and the Middle East” were also doing quite well, which reflected for him that Chopard’s “watchmaking efforts the past 30 years are really starting to pay off.”

“The U.S. remains a country where we’re still growing — for the maison and for watchmaking — even if the economy isn’t exactly dazzling,” de Seynes said. “There’s a very powerful bond with Hermès there: it’s built on long-term investment in the market, even when others were only swearing by China.”

Nowadays, executives are cautious not to hitch their wagon on a single territory, as geographic balance is one of the few real hedges the industry has to weather current turbulences.

“We are very adamant to make sure the brand is successfully global and then very balanced — and we are, which was not the case 10 years ago,” said Patrick Pruniaux, CEO of Ulysse Nardin and its parent group Sowind. “We became very balanced in terms of revenue, and we have to strive to maintain that.”

At Frederique Constant, which has “nice business” in Asia and is “very, very well entrenched in Europe,” the U.S. is “the biggest growth market” with “tremendous growth” across all the Americas, said Jeffrey Cohen, president of its parent Citizen Watch America.

But now that the post-pandemic boom has well and truly gone bust, just showing up with a great looking timepiece isn’t going to cut it.

Younger, Savvier – and Into Complications
In 2026, the consumer walking into a watch retailer or brand’s boutique has read the forums, checked secondary market prices — and could even cost out a movement with surprising accuracy, as Pruniaux recalled from one encounter.

They even arrive in boutiques with screenshots and clear ideas of the movements, heritage and stories they want, said Zenith’s de Clerck. “This is amazing because this is credibility on its own.”

No longer swept along by hype and allocations, they are better equipped to evaluate watches on their design and technical chops, and are value-aware, highly sensitive to authenticity and coherence.

“They like the products, but [when it] is connected to what they think the brand is about,” said Piaget’s CEO Benjamin Comar.

In the watchmaker-turned-jeweler’s case, “this chic, creative, maybe ’60s, ’70s vibe modernized” took the shape of the Polo 79 watch with a stone dial, a sculptural Piaget Sixtie gem-set cuff and the Pebble pendants.

“I’m very surprised that we have people of 30 years old — they weren’t even born when the Polo 79 was discontinued — saying ‘this is so Piaget,’” Comar said. “I’m very proud of this collection and happy also that these designs inspired by that era are still very desirable.”
That shift has made the market “unforgiving,” as Tag Heuer’s chief marketing officer George Ciz put it.
“If you do all those right, people buy. However, if you miss just one of these factors, it will not perform,” he said. “Three years ago, you could get away with one or two of these factors not being perfect and [watches] sold. Now the industry is much tighter. The competition is really strong.”

For brands that get it right, rewards can be immediate. Frederique Constant’s Cohen said that teenagers are coming to buy, not just browse.
“There’s a young generation that’s really loving watches, and they want authenticity. They want things that are credible, they want, you know, the design-value relationship,” he said. “And they’re really researching product, and so they’re seeing the value behind Frederique Constant versus other brands.”
Women Clock In
Traditional gender-based distinctions are also fading. Cohen said the brand is “seeing a growing women’s audience that are really interested in the complication.”
A similar move could be felt at Roger Dubuis, where CEO David Chaumet described two clear groups, one sensitive to “design, materials, storytelling, and beauty of execution” and another “chasing for complication, mechanical achievement, with still a storytelling around that is driving emotion.”
Chanel’s president of watches and fine jewelry Frédéric Grangié told WWD he is reading similar signals from the women’s market. “These two, watch-as-jewel and true watchmaking substance, are not opposing but complementary, and reflect how women approach watches today,” he said.
For the French fashion house’s watchmaking division, “women’s watches have become one of the most resilient growth engines, fueled by rising women’s wealth and engagement,” he said. “The past months clearly confirm this appetite, and we have seen it with double-digit growth figures on this very segment.”


This was fueled in tandem by its jeweled offerings, such as the Première line, and “purpose-engineered automatic calibers” such as its J12 line.
New Collector Currencies
With a more sophisticated and diverse consumer base that is discerning in its spending, a new trifecta for competitive advantage has emerged.
First comes coherence, particularly with one’s identity, paramount to capture and retain attention.
For Hermès, clients appreciate “originality,” in the sense that “Hermès expresses rather classic watchmaking complications in a renewed, somewhat original and sometimes playful way,” said de Seynes. “It appeals because the equivalent isn’t found elsewhere.”
Van Cleef & Arpels’ CEO Catherine Rénier framed watchmaking as an extension of the house’s jewelry heritage, where complications serve storytelling and emotion as much as mechanics.
Panerai booth.
Valentin Flauraud/ Courtesy of Keystone
But behind a poetic reading of time, she positioned the brand’s watchmaking at the crossroads of mechanical ingenuity and decorative crafts, where innovation in materials is as vital as the movements themselves.
Take enamel and aventurine glass. Behind the delicate hues are a research and innovation studio where materials science experts, chemists and experts in each craft develop new “recipes” that respect tradition while creating contemporary expressions.
Speaking at a roundtable with journalists, Cartier’s CEO Louis Ferla said that the brand’s strong desirability came from being instantly recognizable and consistent, with designs firmly rooted in Cartier’s “watchmaker of shapes.”


In a more anxious world, clients seek reassurance in what they perceive as iconic designs — or ones they hope will be — hence Cartier’s focus on its distinctive playbook such as this year’s return of the Roadster, as well as the Cloche, Tortue and Crash Squelette models it showcased.
But coherence doesn’t mean relying solely on heritage. IWC Schaffhausen, which has partnered with Vast, an American aerospace company that aims to build the first commercial space station, is looking to the new space age.
CEO Christoph Grainger-Herr said the focus on “the good old days” ended up reading like “future-phobia,” but that in the last five years, a next-generation space age has been gaining momentum — culminating with the Artemis II mission to the moon that concluded the weekend before the fair.
Matching this is IWC’s Pilot’s Venturer Vertical Drive, billed as the first tool watch for human spaceflight and timekeeping in orbit. For Grainger-Herr, there was real excitement around “working on a future-focused design, which does not have to work around [existing] codes and is trying to radically reinvent how we do things,” he said. “And hopefully, you find a new vision that is aspirational.”
Bang for One’s Buck
Being true to one’s identity also means carefully balancing exclusivity with accessibility and ensuring a sense of value for money.
“Today, the client particularly wants to understand the price. If the price feels fair for the hours of work, the quality of the movement, the most of materials, they’ll buy, whatever the number,” said Julien Tornare, CEO of Hublot. “But if they feel something is too expensive for what it is, they walk away.”

Ulysse Nardin’s Pruniaux summed it up as “we just have to describe what we are making.”
Usher at the 2026 fair.
Gabriel Monnet/ Courtesy of Keystone
But given that factory and atelier visits can only host so many, Bulgari took it one step further with “Bulgari Touch,” a digital passport that has been introduced throughout its entire offering, spanning watches, jewelry and bags.
On watches, a data matrix — it looks like a minute QR code — gives access to all the details about a product, from its sourcing to its servicing, backed by Aura Blockchain. “This makes us the first luxury company which is traceable at 360 degrees,” CEO Jean-Christophe Babin said.
But some executives feel pricing has been pushed to its limits.
“There is a very big point on value for money, and we are obsessively working also to be capable of positioning our watches with a very, very high value for money,” said Cerrato at Bremont. “And we are really recognized for that, which is very important.”
Case in point, Bremont’s integrated-bracelet Supernova line, which sits around the $8,000 mark, “considerably more aggressive than what exists on the market that is $10,000 and up,” the CEO said. It brought in consumers priced out by increases at other brands but also high-end collectors who wanted an additional, perhaps more quotidian, option for the wrist wardrobe.
Asked where he felt the industry is overly optimitic, Citizen’s Cohen said “the price value relationship…is at a critical point right now,” he said. “You’re going to see a reset in the industry in the coming few years,” with massive change to come.


Futureproofing the Ecosystem
However the chips may fall, executives agreed that preserving the industry is paramount, particularly after the post-pandemic bubble has popped.
“It is a bit of an old [flaw] of the watch industry to sometimes be overwhelmingly excited and then overwhelmingly depressed,” said Scheufele. “This movement is really difficult to cope with when it comes to teaching young people.”
He was among executives framing training as a core responsibility, with Chopard hiring eight apprentices a year — sometimes over the finance department’s objections.
“I always refuse [cutting numbers] because I think this is the backbone of our business in the future, and can’t give in to short-term ups and downs,” Scheufele said.
At Ulysse Nardin, which trains 12 people a year, very few stay at the company but that’s fine by Pruniaux, who said it was part of a wider responsibility to the industry.
Others are deepening their investments, with executives talking about the responsibility of ensuring the ecosystem is not hollowed out in this downturn.
For Chanel’s Grangié, “it is essential to partner with players who truly contribute to the creation of our products, rather than simply expanding our creative resources.”
“Looking ahead, we are committed to pursuing collaborations with talented individuals and companies who share our long-term vision,” he continued. “While expanding our business, it is also important to protect and support the techniques of manufacturers having exceptional know-how.”


In addition to its stake in the maker of automatic timepiece movements Kenissi and its own watchmaking manufacture, the French house is investing in independents.
Last year, it took a 30 percent stake in Kross Manufacture, the precision manufacturing atelier launched in 2020 by Marco Tedeschi, the watchmaker who is behind Kross Studio.
Likewise, Hermès favors the long-held partnership mindset it has across its different activities, over a vertical integration strategy. In January, Hermès increased its stake in high-end Swiss movements maker Vaucher Manufacture Fleurier to 40 percent.
“Of course, we’re demanding on quality and reactivity, but we are partners so when there is a downturn, we try to give visibility, to preserve them. It can be tough but we are in a spirit of partnership where everyone prospers,” de Seynes said. “We don’t spend our time tightening the screws to shave prices — that’s not our style.”
That said, “if we realize that a know-how, a key resource or material is under threat, we are open to investing” whether through a majority or minority stake.
The Numbers Game
Throughout the fair, there was little nostalgia for the heady production figures of the post-pandemic euphoria.
“We have also learned that overproduction is definitely to be avoided,” said Scheufele. “We have to accept now that if the demand exceeds the capacity of production, then we won’t be able to reply — and we prefer not to — because this way, we can guarantee a more fluid production process.”


The last two years have been “a reset button,” said de Clerck. “Now we’re getting back to normal.”
Of course, no one would turn their nose at a stronger rebound but in the meantime, “we’ve done our homework and our housekeeping,” de Clerck added. Plus, the more restrained growth of today still comes on top of a much larger business, the Zenith CEO pointed out. He was also happy the company had last year “sold more watches than it produced.”
For Hublot’s Tornare “2021 and 2022 reminded the whole industry that luxury is, by definition, something you don’t need,” he said. “You can’t take those years as the new normal. If you start chasing volumes on that basis, you’re going to hit a wall.”
To last the distance, “we should always deliver one watch less than the demand,” he said.

WWD : Chinese Luxury Market Shows Improvement During Labor Day Holiday

Chinese Luxury Market Shows Improvement During Labor Day Holiday
Based on foot traffic data gathered by Bernstein, overall traffic rose 36 percent compared to average traffic level during 2025's two major holiday periods.

Luxury retail remained resilient during China‘s five-day Labor Day holiday — bucking a broader trend of cautious consumer spending — according to foot traffic data gathered by Bernstein across 10 high-end malls in four major cities.

Even though overall traffic dipped 5 percent below Chinese New Year levels in mid-February, Bernstein highlighted strong performance at LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton brands, Chanel and an acceleration at Compagnie Financière Richemont’s hard luxury brands based on holiday foot traffic at 10 luxury malls, including K11 and Harbour City in Hong Kong, IFC and Plaza 66 in Shanghai, Guomao, SKP and SKP-S in Beijing, and Taikoo Li, IFS and SKP in Chengdu.

The report noted the proprietary data may only reflect one component of retail store productivity, as metrics such as conversion rate and spending by luxury VICs were not captured by the numbers observed on the ground.

“Overall traffic remains 36 percent higher than the average traffic level observed over 2025’s key holiday periods, including Chinese New Year and National Day holidays in 2025. No data was collected in May 2025, limiting our ability to make direct year-over-year comparisons,” the report added.

In the soft luxury category, Louis Vuitton, Chanel and Dior were the three most popular brands, with Louis Vuitton accruing the most customers at its megastores, according to Bernstein data.

Richemont also enjoyed a holiday spike, with strong footfall at Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels.

“One suspects that the falling gold price, which would leave gold-heavy Chinese competitors in relative disfavor, improving fundamentals, spurred by new local management at Cartier and new collections like the Love Unlimited, and pre-buying in anticipation of rumored end of May price increases could be better explanations,” Bernstein observed.

In stark contrast, traffic growth at Hermès continues to underperform its peers. Bernstein observed that “2026’s creative explosion at Chanel and Dior could come at Hermès’ expense.”

Bernstein also observed positive traffic at Burberry, underperformance at Kering brands and “a significant deceleration” at Miu Miu.

Split by region, Shanghai ranked first in terms of overall store traffic, followed by Hong Kong, Beijing and Chengdu.

Consumer sales during this year’s Labor Day holiday rose 14.3 percent year-over-year, according to Xinhua News, China‘s state-owned news agency.

Overall tourist trips increased 3.4 percent, though spending per trip dipped compared with the same period last year — a sign that overall consumer confidence has yet to fully recover.

TechCrunch : The hottest place for startups to strike a deal? The F1 paddock

The hottest place for startups to strike a deal? The F1 paddock

Over cold drinks in the Florida heat, this TechCrunch reporter watched from the paddock as founders and investors — the rich and the richer — mingled in search of deals. Conversations barely paused, except for the occasional glance at the track where drivers, sealed inside multi-million-dollar machines, chased the chequered flag.

F1 weekend is a three-day affair, with the race as the finale. In between are kickoffs, soirées, cocktail parties, dinners, and nightclub takeovers — spaces where business and pleasure blur. Events like this, where wealth concentrates, have historically been places where business deals are struck. But the popularity of the F1 paddock has grown in recent years, especially among the startup and venture crowd.

“It’s a hot place for everyone with access trying to strike a deal,” one founder said, recalling being brought to the paddock by a venture firm two years ago.

This year, Chandler Malone, a founder, said he didn’t even attend the race; he only went to some of the side events. So many venture firms were hosting them and much more than usual, he said.

“You name the fund, it was someone there hosting clients,” Marell Evans, an investor, also told TechCrunch. “Lots of folks missed Milken for F1 Miami.”

F1 teams, once sponsored by major oil, tobacco, banks, and alcohol companies, have embraced the new railroad giants. The F1 team liveries this season — plastered with AI, cloud computing, and enterprise company logos — is a literal sign pointing to where the money is.

The past five years reflects the shift. In that time, Oracle became the title sponsor of Red Bull Racing team, the Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 team struck a multi-year partnership with Microsoft, CoreWeave became Aston Martin Aramco’s official AI cloud partner, Anthropic began working with Williams Racing, Palantir and IBM partnered with Ferrari, AWS began providing data analytics to F1, and the audio app ElevenLabs and fintech Revolut have teamed up with Audi.

Some VC and PE firms also own stakes in F1 teams, including Dorilton Capital’s 2020 acquisition of Williams Racing and the 200 million euro investment into Alpine by backers Otro Capital, RedBird Capital Partners, and Maximum Effort Investments.

Hannan Happi, founder of the climate startup Exowatt, credits the 2020 Netflix F1 show “Drive to Survive” as a catalyst for increasing audience interest. But the tech industry showing up in force is more recent, Happi said, “really the last three or four years.” He cited all the big tech companies that have moved into the sport, including crypto and AI brands. “Where the sponsors go, the executives will follow,” he said.

A concentration of enterprise buyers

It’s no wonder, then, that TechCrunch ran into Lightspeed Ventures CMO Josh Machiz, who explained that founders and execs from many startups in its portfolio were also roaming the paddock. The goal for them, he said, was to strike some enterprise deals with other startups and tech giants.

Though TechCrunch ran into Machiz in the IBM Paddock, he said the firm actually has a structured program in place with Aston Martin to help introduce Lightspeed founders to Aston Martin and its enterprise clients. In the paddock, CIOs and CISOs stand next to CEOs, and rooms are small enough for people to actually chat with each other, Machiz said. Aston Martin, like all the F1 teams, is actively looking for ways to leverage the latest tech, as well as meet the founders behind it.

Technology has always been central to F1, helping drive advancements in consumer tech and car safety. Looking ahead is how teams stay ahead and these days, if a startup like Anthropic gets big enough, the team can nab a future sponsor, too.

Machiz calls Lightspeed the first firm to formalize this kind of partnership and said the Miami race brought in 10 portfolio companies. And it produced results, he said. One of the firm’s blockchain companies struck a handshake deal dover the weekend, and one of its AI infrastructure startups closed two more. Two came from Aston introductions, while the third came by chance, he said.

“The Aston Martin tech team also opened doors to our founders and talked about what they need from builders,” Machiz continued.

Machiz, who used to work at Redpoint, joined Lightspeed just a few months ago. One of the first things he wanted to do was to challenge the idea of the “traditional founder retreat,” where startups and their investors spend time in a remote location, talking, catching up, and, well, sometimes being bored out of their minds.

“The consistent ask from founders was always the same, ‘help me meet more buyers,’” Machiz said, recalling when he used to help plan founder retreats. “Another weekend in Sonoma was never going to do that, and the reviews were always that while [it was] nice to spend time together and to meet tech luminaries or VIP speakers, they’d have rather been building or meeting customers.”

Instead of another retreat, he took the Lightspeed Venture portfolio to F1. It is, after all, he said, “one of the densest concentrations of enterprise buyers anywhere.”

“The opportunity was obvious,” Machiz continued. “We wanted to build a structure around it, not just show up.”

Farooq Malik, founder of the Lightspeed company Rain, said he managed to close a deal, connect with another prospective client, and meet another founder whose product he’s interested in using as part of Rain’s ERP (enterprise resource planning). “This model was a lot more interactive with more organic interactions,” Malik said.

It’s not just startup founders, either. Evans, the investor, said backers are tired of going to dinner and attending conferences. “They want to see real-world experiences, and why not do it at the fastest-growing company in the world right now, F1?,” he mused.

Evans said top money makers like seeing how their business world intertwines with the tech these car teams are using.

“We’ve seen different brands showcase how they’re using AI for the drivers and some of the technology they’re using inside the cars,” he said.

‘Everyone there has capital’
Investor Immpana Srri said she went to Miami this year to look for deals and noted that over the past five years it has become a place for tech people to meet up.

“Sponsors followed, investors followed, and founders followed. Now it’s just where people are,” Srri said.

The race is actually quite fast, she said, and it’s the pre-race and post-race events that matter most over the three-day weekend. Srri flew in by herself, ran into some friends, then got an invite to the McLaren paddock and other brand activations — a micro-conference, she called it — where she met other operators, allocators, and founders.

“It’s all priced as a filter,” she said of how expensive tickets can be. “By the time you’re inside, the room has done the sorting for you. Everyone there has capital, the deal flow, or the kind of track record that justifies dropping six figures on a weekend.”

Like Machiz, she also noted how tiny the spaces are — a pressure cooker of people quietly trying to one-up each other in conversations.

“Deals get showcased; names get dropped. Stuff gets teased. Over the weekend, I heard pitches across defense, CPG, and more,” she said.

Happi, the founder of Exowatt, said F1 champion-turned-investor Nico Rosberg stopped by the startup’s headquarters over the Miami Grand Prix weekend to see what the team was building.

Happi said F1 represents something tech also identifies with: “engineering excellence, rapid iteration, a willingness to spend big to win.”

The aesthetic of the whole sport, he continued, matches the startup world. It’s international by nature, he added, and the fact that the event usually lasts a few days gives people time to close a deal, should they wish.

“F1 is a luxury sport by nature, and that brings a certain type of person,” Happi said, adding that he’s heard of deals getting closed “in the helicopter to the hotel to the track.”

“And it doesn’t hurt that Miami and Las Vegas, suddenly two of the marquee races, are in really fun, entertainment-led cities,” he continued.

Miami kicked off the Lightspeed Aston Martin program, and Machiz hopes to continue throughout the season, at least at the U.S. races, the last of which is Las Vegas in November. Then, he wants to expand his program internationally and is planning to bring a small group of their European founders to England’s Silverstone later this year.

“In AI, distribution is speed,” he said. “The firms that win are the ones that can get founders in front of buyers and into deals faster than anyone else.”

Barron's : In Rush to Buy CPUs, Intel Won’t Be the Only Winner

In Rush to Buy CPUs, Intel Won’t Be the Only Winner

It has been a sad few years for the venerable central processing unit. The one-time standard-bearer of the computing revolution has been pushed aside in recent years with the rise of generative artificial intelligence powered by graphics processing units, or GPUs, which are used for a lot more than graphics these days.

But now attention is swinging back to the main brain of data-center computing, the CPU. With one big change: Unlike in the past, Intel
will have to share the spotlight, and may not even be the primary winner.

In the past two weeks, three server CPU companies—Intel, Advanced Micro Devices, and Arm Holdings—reported their earnings, and each gave commentary indicating that the market will be larger in a few years than they had previously thought.

“In recent months, we have seen clear signs that the CPU is reasserting itself as the indispensable foundation of the AI era,” said Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan in April. “This is not just our wishful thinking, it is what we hear from our customers.”

Arm has projected that the server CPU market will hit $100 billion by 2030, and this week AMD doubled its own estimate to $120 billion. The three companies had $34 billion in combined data-center revenue last year.

That sort of market expansion would be a huge boon to these companies, but to keep it in context, Nvidia is expected to earn more than $150 billion in data-center sales in just the next two quarters.

Before the release of ChatGPT in 2022, servers rarely needed GPUs to do heavy lifting for intense mathematics. Expensive GPU-filled servers were overkill, and data-center customers mostly bought CPU servers to run websites, databases, applications, and other traditional workloads. A typical server configuration contained two Intel server CPUs.

In a 2021 two-way data-center sales race between Intel and Nvidia, Intel held a 70% market share. But the AI revolution changed that dramatically, and by the end of last year Intel only garnered a 7% share.

But four years into the gen AI boom, CPUs are making a comeback. The reason is that AI workloads are beginning to shift from math-intensive training of AI models to the more varied process of running these models, known as inference. The big 2026 inflection is AI agents, software that uses AI models to complete a complex series of tasks from simple conversational prompts. If predictions turn out to be true, in a few years agents will proliferate to the point where they outnumber people on enterprise networks.

Agents chew through inference at a rate that no human could match, and so the hundreds of billions of dollars worth of data centers coming online this year are being built to support that trend. GPUs will still be the primary expense because of AI’s intense math demands.

But agents are software, and software runs on CPUs. If it were five years ago, this would be unquestionably good news for one company: Intel. Indeed, in 2020 and 2021 there was a burst of Covid lockdown-fueled demand for CPU servers and Intel had its best years in the data center, with $26 billion in sales both years.

The data-center CPU market is far more complex now. For starters, server CPUs from Intel’s longtime competitor, AMD, have been gaining in popularity and are considered by many to be better now. At its November investor day, AMD said it had around a 40% market share, and predicted that it will keep rising.

The bigger source of competition may come from chips that are based around the Arm CPU instruction set. An instruction set is the most basic level at which hardware and software communicate. The x86 instruction set that underpins Intel and AMD chips has been dominant in servers, but that’s been changing.

Arm’s first step into x86 server territory was the 2018 launch of the Amazon Web Services Graviton CPU. AWS is the oldest and largest of the clouds, and this set the tone for the industry. Graviton is on its fifth generation now, and for three years running, over half of AWS’s new CPU capacity has been from Graviton. Now the other two big cloud players—Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud—also rent out servers with their own custom Arm CPUs. The advantage over x86 servers is Arm’s power efficiency that allows for more computing in the same size data center.

Apple customers have firsthand experience with the efficiency of Arm’s designs, which have been used in MacBook chips since 2020 and easily beat x86 chips in terms of speed and battery life.

This year, Arm changed the game, announcing it would sell a server chip, the AGI CPU, competing with its own licensees for the first time. The company recently predicted that it could see $15 billion in fiscal year 2031 chip sales and this week said near-term demand is twice what it expected.

Another shift toward Arm-based CPUs in the data center comes from the accelerated servers themselves. At first, Nvidia’s AI servers sported Intel CPUs to orchestrate all the mathematics happening in the GPUs. But then in 2023 Nvidia switched over to using its own Arm-based CPUs, and others are now following. Google’s latest TPU-accelerated server will feature its own Axion CPU, and Meta Platforms’ coming custom AI accelerator servers will be run by Arm AGI CPUs. With a nod to the power efficiency of these CPUs, Arm is becoming the choice for this data-center workload.

AMD’s $120 billion prediction should be considered an educated guess, but if the server CPU market expands that quickly, the competition will be fierce and there may not be room for Intel, AMD, and Arm all to win.

The Information : Tech’s AI Margin Math Is Getting Messier

Tech’s AI Margin Math Is Getting Messier

The Takeaway
  • While many companies are betting on a margin benefit, rising AI prices and unpredictable surges in token usage threaten to throw that whole equation out of whack.

Tech companies from Spotify to Uber to Airbnb told investors on their March-quarter earnings calls that AI was making their workers more productive, allowing them to ship more code and handle more customers with the same or fewer employees.

Many companies are seeing profit margin improvement as AI is helping them do more while holding their headcount steady or in some cases allowing them to cut jobs. But some companies said the rising cost of AI was depressing margins, according to an analysis of 100 public tech companies’ earnings call transcripts.

Pinterest, for example, cited investments in AI chips as contributing to pressure on gross margins in the first quarter, which it said would likely continue throughout the year. Roblox lowered its margin projections in part due to spending on training AI for tools for videogame creators.

And even for companies seeing a margin benefit by trading labor for AI, the risk of rising AI prices and unpredictable surges in token usage could throw that whole equation out of whack.

Here’s a look at some of the more notable comments from companies, as well as other details from their earnings filings.

Spotify

Spotify highlighted how AI usage can raise overall costs for companies. Co-CEO Gustav Soderstrom told analysts on the company’s first-quarter earnings call in late April that operating expenses rose because while the music-streaming firm had “slightly decreased our headcount…we are spending more on compute per employee,” including on its own AI tools and Claude Code and Codex.

Still, he said Spotify was seeing “tremendous returns” in productivity in terms of shipping product updates faster. When asked about AI plans on the earnings call, Chief Financial Officer Christian Luiga said operating expenses would increase for the next quarter or two.

Shopify

Shopify CEO Tobias Lütke told teams last year they must show why AI couldn’t perform a job before they asked for more headcount. Executives said on the company’s earnings call last Tuesday that Shopify’s overall headcount was down slightly in the current year, allowing it to spend more on internal AI usage.

Shopify’s operating profit margin rose roughly 4 percentage points to 12%, as the company reduced sales and marketing and R&D costs as a percentage of revenue.

Not all the uses of AI saved money. Shopify introduced an AI assistant for software subscribers, Sidekick, that proved popular with merchants. But merchants’ increased use of it raised costs for large language models, which CFO Jeff Hoffmeister said partly offset savings on customer support. Hoffmeister said that was “a dynamic” the company expected to continue.

Expedia

Expedia CFO Scott Schenkel said on Thursday that “the use of AI and the associated costs” were both growing, but workforce reductions had allowed Expedia to absorb those increases and still increase profit margins. He expects AI costs to continue rising, putting “upward pressure on costs” in the second half of the year.

CEO Ariane Gorin said Expedia staff were “pressurizing our usage,” but “like with everything we’re doing, we’re being disciplined.”

Roblox

Roblox, the popular service for playing and making games, lowered its full-year margin projections for 2026. Executives said part of the cut was due to incremental spending on training and inference for AI tools for game developers.

The company is betting that tools for coding, AI-powered characters and better graphics will help creators build more ambitious games faster, lifting user engagement and spending. Roblox said it is already running more than 400 AI models and processing over 1.5 million AI inferences per second across its own data centers and cloud providers.

A major piece of the push is Roblox Reality, a new effort to help developers create more photorealistic multiplayer games. Executives said future real-time AI features won’t be free, as Roblox plans to charge for the most compute-heavy tools rather than absorb all of those costs itself.

Pinterest

In January, the online scrapbooking firm cut 15% of its workforce as part of a restructuring aimed at reallocating resources to AI-focused jobs and prioritizing AI-powered products. Last week, the company projected that investment in additional AI chip capacity could hurt its second-quarter gross margin.

Still, CFO Julia Donnelly said chip capacity investments were paying off, helping Pinterest beef up features such as an AI-powered shopping assistant. That’s drawing more users and increasing the amount of time they spend on the site.

Uber

CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said Uber’s investment in AI tools and infrastructure was increasing and would be offset by “slower headcount growth.” Employees in legal and marketing as well as software developers were using AI tools across the company.

He added that if people could increase their output by “20%, 30%, 50%, 100%, then I think metering headcount growth and leaning in on AI investment is going to be well worth it.”

CFO Balaji Krishnamurthy said Uber underestimated both the cost and impact of AI tools when it set its 2026 budget last November and has since increased that budget. Uber reported higher operating margins for the first quarter.

Airbnb

Airbnb executives touted their internal AI use last week, saying nearly 60% of engineers’ code is now co-authored with AI and describing the technology as an “accelerant” that helps build tools the company previously couldn’t tackle. They also highlighted customer service benefits, saying the AI customer assistant now resolves more than 40% of issues without requiring a human agent, up from about one-third in the fourth quarter.

Operations and support costs fell 1 percentage point as a share of revenue, to 12%, from a year earlier, filings showed. Product development also ticked slightly lower as a percentage of revenue.

While Airbnb has touted AI’s ability to resolve customer service issues faster, costs from customer disputes of credit card charges increased.

On Thursday’s earnings call, executives said AI-related expenses are expected to rise over the year, but Airbnb believes it can absorb that spending while still hitting its margin target.

Instacart

Instacart framed AI mostly as a product and revenue opportunity, in the form of better shopper recommendations and stronger advertising tools, and less as an immediate human replacement.

On a call with analysts, CEO Chris Rogers said 2025 was an experimentation period for AI, and Instacart is now monitoring whether AI makes work more productive and is looking for ways to offset costs where it can.

Instacart said total operating expenses fell slightly in the first quarter as a percentage of transaction value, but it did not tie that improvement to AI. Meanwhile, research and development costs rose, mainly because of an increase in employee compensation.

Still, the product push comes at a price. Instacart’s cost of revenue increased, primarily because of credit card processing fees, but company filings also called out $10 million more in depreciation and amortization, mostly tied to internal-use software.

Reuters : Armani could split 15% stake among L'Oreal, LVMH, EssilorLuxottica, re

Armani could split 15% stake among L'Oreal, LVMH, EssilorLuxottica, report says

MILAN, May 10 (Reuters) - Italian fashion house Giorgio Armani is considering ​selling a 15% stake in three ‌equal parts following the designer's death, potentially bringing in three buyers he had selected as shareholders, a ​newspaper reported on Sunday.

Armani, who died at 91 ​last September, had named French luxury ⁠group LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab and two commercial partners--beauty products ​maker L'Oreal (OREP.PA), opens new tab and EssilorLuxottica (ESLX.PA), opens new tab--as preferred buyers for the ​company.

Based on the founder's will, the sale of an initial 15% stake in the group must take ​place within 12-18 months of his ​death.

Italian daily la Repubblica reported, without citing sources, that ‌Armani ⁠CEO Giuseppe Marsocci is preparing a business plan as he moves to appoint two advisers to oversee the sale.

The advisers would then ​share Marsocci's ​five-year business ⁠plan with potential investors.

Ahead of the formal launch of the process, ​the group was considering splitting the ​15% ⁠stake in three parts, the paper said, adding this would help keep all three ⁠buyers ​engaged in the initial phase.

A representative ​for Armani said the group had no comment on ​the report.

TechCrunch : Nvidia has already committed $40B to equity AI deals this year

Nvidia has already committed $40B to equity AI deals this year

Nvidia continues to be a major investor in the AI ecosystem, committing more than $40 billion to equity investments in AI companies — and that’s just in these early months of 2026, according to CNBC.

Much of that total comes from a single bet, a $30 billion investment in OpenAI. But CNBC reports that the chipmaker has also announced seven multi-billion dollar investments in publicly traded companies, most recently deals to invest up to $3.2 billion in glassmaker Corning and up to $2.1 billion in data center operator IREN.

We’ve previously rounded up Nvidia’s investments in AI startups, including 67 venture deals in 2025. And according to FactSet data, it’s already participated in around two dozen investment rounds in private startups in 2026.

The fact that Nvidia has been investing in some of its own customers has led to the recurring criticism that these are circular deals moving money back-and-forth between the same companies.

Wedbush Securities analyst Matthew Bryson said Nvidia’s investments fall “squarely into the circular investment theme,” but suggested that if successful, they could help the company build a “competitive moat.”

CrunchBase : The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Enterprise AI, Space Tech And

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Enterprise AI, Space Tech And Biotech Top The Ranks

Another week, another infusion of big AI rounds. For this past week, the largest fundraiser by a long shot was Sierra, a developer of AI customer experience tools that picked up $950 million. Other big rounds went to companies in sectors including satellite development, biotech, and, yes, more vertical AI and AI infrastructure.

1. Sierra, $950M, customer experience AI: Sierra, a provider of AI-driven tools for customer experience management, raised $950 million in fresh funding at a $15 billion valuation. Google Ventures and Tiger Global led the financing for the three-year-old, San Francisco-based company.

2. Astranis, $455M, space tech: Astranis, a developer of advanced satellites for high orbits, secured $450 million in equity and debt investment. The financing included a $300 million Series E equity round led by Snowpoint Ventures and Franklin Templeton and up to $155 million in credit through Trinity Capital.

3. Anagram Therapeutics, $250M, biotech: Natick, Massachusetts-based Anagram Therapeutics, a developer of a pill for people living with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to cystic fibrosis, pancreatic cancer and related disorders, closed on $250 million in new funding from Blackstone Life Sciences.

4. Blitzy, $200M, AI software development: Blitzy, developer of an autonomous software development platform, picked up $200 million in fresh funding at a $1.4 billion valuation. Northzone led the financing for the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company.

5. Corgi Insurance, $160M, insurance: Corgi Insurance, provider of an AI-native insurance platform for startups, secured $160 million in Series B funding. TCV led the financing, which set a $1.3 billion valuation for the San Francisco-based company.

6. Panthalassa, $140M, renewable energy: Portland, Oregon-based Panthalassa, which aims to perform AI inference computing at sea using power generated from ocean waves, raised $140 million in a Series B financing led by Peter Thiel.

7. Reserv, $125M, insurance: Reserv, a provider of third-party administrator services to the insurance industry, closed on $125 million in a Series C funding round led by KKR. Launched in 2022, New York-based Reserv has raised over $200 million in known funding to date, per Crunchbase data.

8. DeepInfra, $107M, AI infrastructure: DeepInfra, a cloud platform for high-throughput AI inference, landed $107 million in Series B funding. Georges Harik and 500 Global led the financing for the four-year-old, Palo Alto, California-based company.

9. Tessera Labs, $60M, vertical AI: San Jose, California-based Tessera Labs, developer of an AI platform for enterprise ERP systems and data, secured $60 million in a funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz.

10. Astrocade, $56M, gaming: Astrocade, developer of an AI platform for creating, building and playing games, announced $56 million in new funding. The funding for the Los Altos, California-based company includes a Series B led by Sequoia Capital and a Series A led by Sea, Astrocade said.