FT : ECB to target ‘empty shell’ operations at big investment banks

ECB to target ‘empty shell’ operations at big investment banks
Central bank ramps up push for non-EU lenders to increase staff and capital within bloc

The European Central Bank has warned the biggest Wall Street and City of London investment banks that it has lost patience with their use of “empty shell” EU trading desks since Brexit and plans to force them to shift more resources.

The move ramps up the ECB’s long-running push for big investment banks based outside the EU to increase the staff and capital they locate in their financial market operations within the bloc, which started when their European businesses were split because of Brexit.

Andrea Enria, head of supervision at the ECB, said in a blog post on Thursday that “empty shell structures . . . are a very real concern”.

“The ECB is not setting specific targets for the relocation of banking business to the euro area. Instead, we want to ensure that incoming legal entities have onshore governance and risk management arrangements that are commensurate, from a prudential perspective, with the risk they originate,” he added.

The central bank has completed the first phase of an assessment to establish how widely seven international banks transfer the risk of eurozone operations outside the bloc, in particular to the UK, where many had based their European operations before Brexit.

The ECB is focused on eight big banks, one of which it already dealt with in an earlier assessment. They are JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, HSBC, Barclays and UBS.

Out of 256 trading desks at the seven banks, it found that 70 per cent were using back-to-back models, which allow them to offset EU trades with their London entities and effectively manage the risk from the UK. Another 20 per cent used desk-splitting, in which they handle EU clients or assets jointly from desks both in the bloc and in the UK.

Enria said the ECB had identified the 56 most material trading desks and would “issue binding decisions” to their parent groups, requiring them to beef up their eurozone operations or face fines.

WSJ : China Insists Party Elites Shed Overseas Assets, Eyeing Western Sanctions

China Insists Party Elites Shed Overseas Assets, Eyeing Western Sanctions on Russia
An internal Communist Party directive bars senior officials from owning property abroad or stakes in overseas entities, whether directly or through spouses and children

HONG KONG—China’s Communist Party will block promotions for senior cadres whose spouses or children hold significant assets abroad, people familiar with the matter said, as Beijing seeks to insulate its top officials from the types of sanctions now being directed at Russia.

The ban, outlined in an internal notice by the party’s powerful Central Organization Department, could play a role in Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s efforts to increase his influence at a twice-a-decade leadership shuffle scheduled for later this year.

Issued in March, the directive prohibits spouses and children of ministerial-level officials from holding—directly or indirectly—any real estate abroad or shares in entities registered overseas, the people said.

Senior officials and members of their immediate families would also be barred from setting up accounts with overseas financial institutions unless they have legitimate reasons for doing so—such as study or work—the people said.

It isn’t clear if the rules apply retroactively, but family members of some senior officials have sold shares in overseas companies in order to comply, the people said. It isn’t known if the directive will be made public.

The directive came as Mr. Xi seeks to minimize geopolitical risks for the Communist Party amid concerns that officials with overseas financial exposure could become a liability if the U.S. and other Western powers impose sanctions against Chinese leaders and their relatives, similar to what was done against Moscow following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the people said.

“Leading cadres, especially senior cadres, must pay attention to family discipline and ethics,” Mr. Xi told the party’s top disciplinary agency in January. Officials must “lead by example in managing their spouses and children properly, being a dutiful person and doing things in a clean way,” he said.

The Central Organization Department didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Officials must sign pledges declaring compliance with the new rules, a requirement that would give Mr. Xi more leverage over the political elite ahead of the party’s 20th national congress, which is set to take place late this year.

Mr. Xi is expected to secure a third five-year term as party chief at the congress while packing his leadership bench with more trusted associates, in an effort to shore up his status as China’s most powerful leader in decades. The compliance pledges would give Mr. Xi leverage over any official found violating the overseas-assets rules, as the offending cadre would become liable for serious offenses like disloyalty and dishonesty to the party.

Since taking power in 2012, Mr. Xi has waged a high-profile campaign to fight corruption and curb displays of extravagance among officials, saying that the party faced an existential battle against moral decay within its ranks.

In 2014, the party said it discovered some 3,200 “naked officials” who sent spouses and children abroad and stashed financial assets overseas and demoted about a third of them, citing their seniority and their families’ refusal to return to China. Beijing has also gone after offshore assets linked to economic fugitives, as part of its “Fox Hunt” and “Sky Net” campaigns against alleged white-collar criminals and corrupt officials.

The party has demanded greater financial disclosure from its cadres over recent decades, albeit only to internal monitors. The requirements still fall short of a so-called sunshine law, as advocated by some scholars, which would require officials to publicly declare their personal assets. The party introduced rules in 1995 that required leading cadres to report their income and has since added regulations asking officials to disclose more personal and financial information, including details of their spouses’ and children’s employment, as well as real estate and investment holdings.

In the early 2010s, public debate over wealth-disclosure requirements for officials evolved into a series of protests by activists demanding greater transparency into the family assets of senior officials. Authorities later arrested many members of the campaign.

China’s mounting tensions with the West have fueled concerns that any financial exposure that senior Chinese officials have overseas could be used as leverage against Beijing, particularly after seeing how the U.S. and European governments unleashed far-reaching sanctions against Russia after its Ukraine invasion, some of the people said.

China doesn’t prohibit its citizens from setting up or investing in offshore firms, which can serve legitimate purposes but have also been used to evade taxes and funnel illicit funds abroad. Relatives of party officials are known to have used offshore companies to hold assets.

In 2016, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists issued a report that linked the relatives of two senior party leaders—both since retired—to offshore commercial activities conducted through law firm Mossack Fonseca & Co., citing a leaked trove of documents known as the “Panama Papers.”

The consortium reported the names of members of elite party families identified as directors or shareholders of offshore companies, including a brother-in-law of Mr. Xi, as well as relatives of Mao Zedong, former party chief Hu Yaobang and former Vice President Zeng Qinghong. The report didn’t accuse any individual or organization of wrongdoing.

The U.S. has imposed sanctions on a number of Chinese officials in recent years, including freezing any U.S.-based assets they may control, citing their alleged roles in directing rights abuses in the northwestern region of Xinjiang and suppressing civil liberties in Hong Kong. Targets included two members of the party’s 25-member Politburo, specifically Wang Chen, a senior official in China’s legislature, and Chen Quanguo, the Xinjiang party chief from 2016 to 2021.

In April, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman said she hoped Beijing “takes the right lessons out of the Russia-Ukraine crisis,” suggesting that the West would impose heavy sanctions on China should it use military force against the democratically self-governed island of Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its territory. Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng insisted that “China won’t be scared” by the threat of sanctions similar to those applied against Russia.

“What kind of storms haven’t we weathered in the more than 70 years since the founding of ‘new China,’” Mr. Le told a forum. “Not only has China not collapsed, but it is still thriving and developing at a rapid speed. What else should we be afraid of?”

WSJ : Chinese Developers Get State Help to Tap Bond Market

Chinese Developers Get State Help to Tap Bond Market
Country Garden, Longfor and Midea Real Estate are making use of credit derivatives to help get new deals done

China is helping some stronger developers tap the domestic bond market, the latest move to support the ailing property sector amid a broader economic slowdown.

With the industry in crisis, markets in mainland China and abroad are mostly shut to privately owned developers. The new deals address that problem by packaging some bonds with credit derivatives, so that buyers are shielded against the risk of default.

The initiative follows other measures, including a cut by the central bank in mortgage rates for first-time home buyers, and easing in different regions for things like down payments and home-purchasing restrictions.

Still, investors and analysts warn it will take time to stabilize the property market, with sentiment weak among prospective home buyers and financial distress widespread among developers. Meanwhile, stringent lockdowns in many cities have dealt a further blow to consumer confidence and disrupted new apartment sales.

Country Garden Holdings Co. 2007 1.65% , Longfor 960 0.38% Group Holdings Ltd. and Midea Real Estate 3990 2.52% Holding Ltd. are selling domestic bonds in yuan this week, prospectuses show. The three developers, which aren’t state-backed, are aiming to raise a total of up to 2 billion yuan, equivalent to $296 million.

Private developers have only sold 11.8 billion yuan of onshore bonds so far this year, Wind data shows, compared with 190 billion yuan issued by their state-owned peers.

The deals’ underwriters and China Securities Finance Corp. will also sell credit derivatives to accompany some of the debt, according to deal messages viewed by The Wall Street Journal, and people familiar with the Longfor bond sale.

The Country Garden and Midea deals will be accompanied by credit-default swaps, the messages showed, while the Longfor deal could either make use of such a swap or another similar instrument known as a credit risk mitigation warrant, the people said.

Buyers of those swaps and warrants will pay an extra premium to reduce their credit risk, meaning their investment ultimately resembles a safer but lower-yielding government bond. Current prices in China’s credit markets mean they are still set to earn a higher interest rate than on a risk-free sovereign bond, despite using credit-default swaps as a form of insurance.

The default risk will instead be borne by the underwriters and CSFC, which is owned by China’s major exchanges and one of the country’s clearinghouses.

Country Garden confirmed that default-swap contracts would be written alongside its bond deal. The other two developers didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Financially weaker developers are unlikely to be able to do similar deals, analysts said. Brokers would be reluctant to bear the increased default risk, even if it meant collecting higher swap premiums, and Chinese regulators limit institutions’ overall CDS exposures.

The system will work for developers with relatively strong fundamentals whose existing bonds aren’t trading too cheaply, said Yao Yu, founder of YY Rating, an independent Chinese credit-research firm. “As people say, it is easy to convince people to push the boat with the current, but very hard to convince them to do so against it,” Mr. Yao said.

“This is a top-down thing, facilitated by regulators,” he said, adding that securities firms treated it as a political task.

Credit-default swaps have been used internationally for decades but were only introduced in China in 2016 by the regulator of the interbank bond market, one of China’s main debt markets. They became more widely used in 2018 when onshore defaults by privately owned enterprises started to pick up.

The credit warrants are similar to default swaps, but unlike those instruments they are publicly traded, and only insure against an issuer failing to meet its obligations for a single specified bond.

Recent data has underscored the scale of the challenge facing China’s property sector. Government statistics released Monday showed new-home starts and home sales by value in April fell 44% and 47%, respectively, from a year earlier, while mortgage demand also plunged.

Even the comparatively sedate official data is flashing a warning signal, with a monthly measure showing new-home prices had fallen on an annual basis for the first time in more than six years.

An eventual market recovery wouldn’t be of that much help to developers with imminent funding needs, said Kaven Tsang, an analyst at the credit-ratings firm Moody’s Investors Service. “The market is definitely going to be polarized, with the stronger ones taking over more market share from the weaker ones,” Mr. Tsang said.

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls

  • Upgrades:
    • Cisco (CSCO) upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at KGI Securities; tgt $56
    • Public Storage (PSA) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at BMO Capital Markets; tgt lowered to $370
    • Reinsurance Group of America (RGA) upgraded to Equal-Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt raised to $132
  • Downgrades:
    • BNY Mellon (BK) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Deutsche Bank; tgt lowered to $45
    • CSX (CSX) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt lowered to $35
    • Healthpeak (PEAK) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt $32
    • Life Storage (LSI) downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at BMO Capital Markets; tgt lowered to $130
    • Norfolk Southern (NSC) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt lowered to $260
    • NTT Data (NTDTY) downgraded to Sell from Neutral at Citigroup
    • Physicians Realty Trust (DOC) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt $18
    • Primerica (PRI) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $148
    • Schnitzer Steel (SCHN) downgraded to Sector Weight from Overweight at KeyBanc Capital Markets
    • Target (TGT) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Stifel; tgt lowered to $185
    • Thor Industries (THO) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at DA Davidson; tgt $60
    • Under Armour (UAA) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $11
    • Union Pacific (UNP) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt lowered to $235
    • UWM Holdings (UWMC) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at Piper Sandler; tgt lowered to $3
    • Winnebago (WGO) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at DA Davidson; tgt $52
    • Wipro (WIT) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at JP Morgan
  • Others:
    • Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) initiated with an Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt $7.20
    • Dorman Products (DORM) initiated with a Buy at MKM Partners; tgt $129
    • Futu Holdings (FUTU) assumed with a Buy at China Renaissance; tgt lowered to $51.80
    • UP Fintech (TIGR) assumed with a Hold at China Renaissance; tgt lowered to $3.80

WSJ : Spirit Airlines Board Urges Shareholders to Reject JetBlue Offer

Spirit Airlines Board Urges Shareholders to Reject JetBlue Offer
Carrier continues to support $2.9 billion tie-up with Frontier

Spirit Airlines Inc.’s SAVE -5.91% board is urging shareholders to reject a hostile takeover bid from JetBlue JBLU -2.94% Airways Corp. and vote in favor of a tie-up with Frontier Group Holdings Inc. ULCC -2.88%

The board said in a statement that the unsolicited $30-per-share offer from JetBlue isn’t in Spirit’s best interest given the substantial regulatory hurdles the deal would face.

The directors are urging shareholders to instead vote for a $2.9 billion merger with Frontier.

Spirit Chairman Mac Gardner said that JetBlue’s offer hasn’t addressed the risk that the deal may not get past the finish line and that doesn’t offer enough protections for Spirit shareholders.

“The proposed combination of JetBlue and Spirit lacks any realistic likelihood of obtaining regulatory approval, while our company faces a long and bleak limbo period as we await resolution,” he said in a statement.

Shares of all three airlines fell slightly in premarket trading.

The rival low-cost carriers have been playing tug of war over Spirit, which rejected JetBlue’s offer for a $3.6 billion acquisition over concerns that the deal would be blocked by antitrust regulators.

JetBlue on Monday launched its hostile takeover attempt for Spirit, taking its case directly to shareholders in an attempt to pressure Spirit management to re-engage in negotiation.

Spirit agreed in February to be acquired by fellow low-cost airline Frontier in a cash-and-stock deal. Both airlines cater to budget-conscious travelers with low base fares and fees for everything else, from bottled water to carry-on bags.

JetBlue later came in with a higher offer, arguing that a combination of JetBlue and Spirit would create a more formidable competitor to the current airline market.

Spirit has continued to stick with the Frontier offer, over regulatory concerns that a combination with JetBlue would be blocked. JetBlue has pledged to shed assets to win regulatory approval and pay a $200 million breakup fee if it is unable to complete the proposed deal due to antitrust concerns.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • PLCE -16%, CSCO -11.1%, VIPS -8%, BBWI -6.4%, KSS -4.6%, EXP -2.7%

Other news:

  • ENTA -15.1% (reports top-line data from RSVP study of EDP-938; study did not meet primary endpoint)
  • UAA -5.6% (CEO to step down; also downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley)
  • CIEN -5.2% (in sympathy with CSCO earnings/guidance)
  • TRQ -4.5% (Rio Tinto amends funding plan with Turquoise Hill Resources)
  • JNPR -3.8% (in sympathy with CSCO earnings/guidance)
  • AVGO -3.6% (in sympathy with CSCO earnings/guidance)
  • ANET -3.5% (in sympathy with CSCO earnings/guidance)
  • HCI -2.2% (announces $150 mln convertible offering)
  • NOK -2.1% (in sympathy with CSCO earnings/guidance)
  • TSLA -1.7% (NHTSA has opened a special investigation on a crash in CA according to Reuters)
  • EXTR -1.4% (in sympathy with CSCO earnings/guidance)
  • BB -1.4% (provides its long-term financial goals)
  • LITE -1.3% (in sympathy with CSCO earnings/guidance)
  • GMED -1.1% (first surgeries performed with the Excelsius3D imaging platform performed)
  • CS -0.8% (Fitch downgrades Credit Suisse Group to 'BBB+'; Stable Outlook)

Analyst comments:

  • UNP -2% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup)
  • CSX -1.7% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup)
  • NSC -1.6% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup)
  • LSI -1.5% (downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at BMO Capital Markets)
  • PEAK -1.4% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)
  • TGT -0.9% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at Stifel)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • GOOS +9.4%, BJ +4.7%, SQM +4.6%, SNPS +3.9%, WMS +2.9%, GDS +1.6%, CPRT +1.4%, WNC +1.4% (longer term guidance), HWKN +0.9%, MNRO +0.8%

Other news:

  • RCKT +10.5% (Presents Positive Top-line Data from Severe Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I Program at the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy)
  • SIGA +6.4% (FDA approves Intravenous (IV) Formulation of TPOXX (tecovirimat) for the treatment of smallpox)
  • KOD +5.3% (Baker Brothers affirms increased active stake following recent purchase ~457K shares (5/16-5/18 transaction dates))
  • MRSN +4.9% (granted orphan drug designation to XMT-2056)
  • KBR +3.5% (awarded two task orders under the Department of Defense Information Analysis Center's multiple-award contract vehicle totaling $106 mln for the Air Force Life Cycle Management Cente)
  • CDEV +2.9% (Centennial Resource Development and Colgate Energy Partners III to combine in merger of equals)
  • DMTK +1.8% (presents new research differentiating atopic dermatitis and psoriasis)
  • AUR +1.7% (AUR expands autonomous commercial linehaul trucking pilot with FDX)
  • FYBR +1.7% (updates shareholders at MoffettNathanson Conference; plans to exceed fiber build target in 2022)
  • CURO +1.4% (agrees to sell legacy U.S. direct lending business for $345 mln; acquires First Heritage Credit for $140 mln)
  • KDNY +1.3% (Presents Updated Data from BION-1301 Phase 1/2 Trial)
  • HSTM +1.1% (acquires CloudCME)

(ZH) The Swiss Connection: How Russia Is Weathering Tough Sanctions

The Swiss Connection: How Russia Is Weathering Tough Sanctions

  • Continued oil and gas exports as well as a propped-up ruble, have allowed Moscow to weather Western sanctions.
  • JPM has backtracked on its earlier forecasts of a 35% contraction in Russian GDP in the second quarter.
  • The lion's share of Russian raw materials is traded via Switzerland and its nearly 1,000 commodity firms.
A couple of weeks ago, Putin went on record calling the war in Ukraine a "tragedy" and claiming that economic sanctions imposed on his country had "failed." Turns out he wasn't exactly bluffing.

Three months into the most severe and coordinated sanctions by Western governments, Russia's economy is proving to be a hard nut to crack. Continued oil and gas exports as well as a propped-up ruble, have allowed Moscow to weather the West's sanctions much better than expected.
In a note to clients dated last week and made public on Monday, JPMorgan Chase says business sentiment surveys from the country "are signaling a not very deep recession in Russia, and therefore imply upside risks to our growth forecasts. The data at hand therefore do not point to an abrupt plunge in activity, at least for now".
JPM has also backtracked on its earlier forecasts of a 35% contraction in Russian GDP in the second quarter and 7% for all of 2022, now predicting that the recession will be far less severe.
The bank did, however, note that Russia will certainly feel the impact of current and potential sanctions, adding that the Russian economy would be in much better shape if the country had not invaded Ukraine.
Rouble Recovers To Pre-War Levels
Perhaps an even more impressive demonstration of the resilience of Russia's economy is how quickly the country's currency has recovered from its early-year crash. Defying a plethora of energy and financial sanctions, the rouble, Russia's national currency, has staged a surprising rebound and even managed to return to pre-war levels.
The rouble crashed spectacularly in the days immediately after President Vladimir Putin ordered a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, falling as much as 30% against the U.S. dollar. The currency appeared doomed as Western countries slapped Moscow with an increasingly harsh set of sanctions, including measures to restrict the Russian Central Bank's ability to access its vast pool of foreign reserves. Indeed, a cross-section of analysts warned of an inevitable default as Russia ran out of dollars.
However, the rouble was not down for the count for long, and started to bounce back just weeks after its biggest crash. By the end of March, the rouble began to gradually recover; by mid-April, its value hit 1 RUB = 0.013 USD, a level last seen on the eve of the invasion. Currently, the ruble is exchanging for 0.016 USD, a level it last touched in January 2020.
What explains this recovery?
Putin's demand for buyers of Russian gas to pay in rubles was a masterstroke. After initial resistance, western gas buyers are increasingly toeing the line, with one of Germany's largest natural gas importers, VNG, recently opening an account with Gazprombank for payments for Russian gas under Moscow's terms.
According to Maria Demertzis, deputy director at Bruegel, a Brussels-based economics think tank, EU payments for Russian pipeline gas have been playing a big role in propping up the currency.
For all the tough talk about abandoning Russian energy commodities, Russia is still managing to sell a good amount of its oil and gas, thanks to the fact that some of the world's biggest commodity traders have little compunction against financing Putin's war machine.
Indeed, Oleg Ustenko, economic adviser to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, has written to the four companies demanding that they stop trading Russian hydrocarbons immediately since export revenues are funding Moscow's purchase of weapons and missiles.
According to ship tracking and port data, Switzerland's Vitol, Glencore, and Gunvor as well as Singapore's Trafigura, have all continued to lift large volumes of Russian crude and products, including diesel.
Vitol has pledged to stop buying Russian crude by the end of this year, but that's still a long way from today. Trafigura said it would stop buying crude from Russia's state-run Rosneft by May 15th, but is free to buy cargoes of Russian crude from other suppliers. Glencore has said it wouldn't enter any "new" trading business with Russia. But the reality is that while the G7 has committed to banning or phasing out Russian oil imports, and while the U.S., Canada, the UK, and Australia have imposed outright bans, the EU is still unable to move forward, with Hungary holding a ban hostage. Meanwhile, India and China are making up for much of the losses for Russia.
Switzerland's Golden Calf
A lot of the blame falls on Switzerland. The lion's share of Russian raw materials is traded via Switzerland and its nearly 1,000 commodity firms.
Switzerland is an important global financial hub with a thriving commodities sector, despite the fact that it is far from all the global trade routes and has no access to the sea, no former colonial territories, and no significant raw materials of its own.
Oliver Classen, media officer at the Swiss NGO Public Eye, says that "this sector accounts for a much larger part of the GDP in Switzerland than tourism or the machinery industry". According to a 2018 Swiss government report, commodity trading volume reaches almost $1 trillion ($903.8 billion).
Deutsche Welle has reported that 80% of Russian raw materials are traded via Switzerland, according to a report by the Swiss embassy in Moscow. About a third of the raw materials are oil and gas, while two-thirds are base metals such as zinc, copper, and aluminum. In other words, deals signed on Swiss desks are directly facilitating Russian oil and gas to continue flowing freely.
With gas and oil exports coming in as the main source of income for Russia, accounting for 30 to 40% of the Russian budget, Switzerland's role cannot be overlooked in this war-time equation. In 2021, Russian state corporations earned around $180 billion (€163 billion) from oil exports alone.
Again, unfortunately, Switzerland has been handling its commodities trade with kid gloves.
According to DW, raw materials are often traded directly between governments and via commodities exchanges. However, they can also be traded freely, and Swiss companies have specialized in direct sales thanks to an abundance of capital.
In raw materials transactions, Swiss commodity traders have adopted letters of credits or L/Cs as their preferred instruments. A bank will give a loan to a trader and, as collateral, receive a document making it the owner of the commodity. As soon as the buyer pays the bank, the document (and ownership of the commodity) is transferred to the trader. The system gives traders more credit lines without their creditworthiness having to be checked, and the bank has the value of the commodity as security.
This is a prime example of transit trade, where only the money flows through Switzerland, but actual raw materials usually do not touch Swiss soil. Thus, no details about the magnitude of the transaction land on the desk of the Swiss customs authorities leading to highly imprecise information about the flow volumes of raw materials.
"The whole commodities trade is under-recorded and underregulated. You have to dig around to collect data and not all information is available," Elisabeth Bürgi Bonanomi, a senior lecturer in law and sustainability at Bern University, has told DW.
Obviously, the lack of regulation is very appealing to commodity traders--especially those that deal with raw materials mined in non-democratic countries such as the DRC.
"Unlike the financial market, where there are rules for tackling money laundering and illegal or illegitimate financial flows, and a financial market supervisory authority, there is currently no such thing for commodity trading," financial and legal expert at Public Eye David Mühlemann told the German broadcaster ARD.
But don't expect things to change any time soon.
Calls for a supervisory body for the commodities sector based on the model of the one for the financial market by the likes of Swiss NGO Public Eye and Swiss Green Party proposal have so far failed to bear fruit. Thomas Mattern from the Swiss People's Party (SVP) has spoken out against such a move, insisting that Switzerland should retain its neutrality, "We do not need even more regulation, and not in the commodities sector either."