WWD : Sephora Chief Reimagines Prestige Beauty’s Future

Sephora Chief Reimagines Prestige Beauty’s Future
Martin Brok has a holistic view of what’s to come.

Sephora chief executive officer Martin Brok is redefining the future of prestige beauty.

The former Starbucks executive’s first exposure to Sephora, which he joined in September 2020, came while working at Nike. That was at a time when the company was shifting from a wholesale to a direct-to-consumer-driven model, with sharp points in the digital space.

“[Sephora] became a reference point for us,” Brok said during the WWD Beauty CEO Summit’s opening keynote speech, in a conversation with Jenny B. Fine, executive editor, beauty, WWD and Beauty Inc.

He drew parallels between the coffee and cosmetics industries — especially “the vibrancy of the markets.”

“What’s impressed me about beauty is how quickly it’s actually changing,” Brok said. “The pandemic — absolutely — only accelerated it.”

One month after Brok started at Sephora, France went into a serous lockdown. “That was pretty difficult,” he said. “But the good news is what the pandemic has brought about is really a change in the industry as a whole.”

That involves a shift in how the consumer perceives beauty and well-being — exercise, nutrition and sleep included.

“It’s all linked together,” Brok said. “The consumer used to treat those as different compartments. And on top of that, the landscape continues to change.”

It’s at a quicker pace than before. “So the need for us to stay connected to that quickly evolving consumer sentiment and expectation is really paramount,” he said.

One key goal is to know the consumer better than she knows herself. That means digging into what’s key. “What she loves, where and how she wants to engage is more important than ever before,” Brok said.

As the competition in the beauty retail and brand scene intensifies, Sephora executives have mined what’s at its core. They spent time with the retailer’s founder Dominique Mandonnaud, a meeting Brok called “super inspiring, but also good validation.”

Some Sephora “superpowers” have been identified. One is its products, which are ultimately why a consumer goes to shop at the store. “And she comes to us with an expectation that we curate on her behalf, and that’s really important,” said Brok, who described the beauty space as “quite overwhelming.”

Sephora’s second superpower is its omnichannel approach. Consumers today expect a seamlessness to transacting — on every channel.

“No matter where they are, they want the same experience,” he said. “It usually starts on a phone and, in the best case, ends on the phone. We are the world’s largest, and quite frankly, only omnichannel prestige [beauty] player.”

Sephora’s third superpower is community, which continues to play an increasingly vital role. The retailer operates across 36 countries and has built a fanbase of 165 million consumers. On a daily basis, Sephora engages 6 million consumers both in store and online.

“You need to understand the community on an individual and personalized basis,” Brok said. “Sephora is a company with an incredible track record of innovating continuously and disrupting along the way.

“Our opportunity now is to take the innovation that is coming from across the globe — whether it’s home chat, same-day delivery, how we drive the personalization engine, the next evolution of the store experience, omnichannel services — and literally integrating those so that we leverage the power of the three regions that we operate in, let them be the drivers of the innovation and then scale across the board,” he said. “The opportunity for us now is to be able to do that faster.”

Consumers don’t see three different Sephora brands, in North America, Europe and Asia. “It’s one brand across the globe,” he said. “What happens in one part of the world, in a nanosecond, is communicated in another part of the world. So making that happen, and ensuring that we are delivering the same experience across the globe, the same drivers to grow, this is absolutely paramount.”

So is a seamless consumer experience that ingrates the physical and virtual spaces. An app, for instance, doesn’t just play a role on the phone, but in store, too. A consumer in a brick-and-retail environment might be researching and choosing products through the app then picking them up and paying for them offline.

“The role of the app for the consumer is becoming more important,” Brok said. “The good news is we know for a fact that when they’re on the app, the conversion is significantly higher and, in most cases, the average basket [is], as well.

“We also have an opportunity [to bring] the Sephora magic into a digital space,” he continued, characterizing the digital space as having been unidimensional, competing on price and convenience — a “no win” situation — in the past.

Sephora has brought its beauty advisors online. “We see some incredible results,” said Brok, who added: “But I want to just underline the fact that the role of the store is not going away.”

He underlined consumers’ return to brick-and-mortar at an unprecedented pace and that the role of stores is evolving.

“What we need to do is ensure that we figure out how to seamlessly integrate, but also compliment, the experience,” said Brok, who said the richness and texture of in-store experiences are key.

One way to augment them is through services — paid services and diagnostic tools, such as color, skin and ultimately hair analysis — allowing Sephora to get to know consumers better “so that we can engage and build a relationship that is deeper and more profound than ever before,” Brok said. There will be more of these to come.

Product newness and differentiation, in part through exclusivity, also continue to be important.

“Clearly there are brands that are not exclusive to us,” he said. “That doesn’t mean that our relationship can’t be mutually beneficial in the sense that there’s an opportunity to do unique things within the Sephora space that allows us to create value, excitement and experiences for the consumer. That’s our collective opportunity, whether you’re exclusive or not. That is ultimately what the consumer is looking for.”

With the convergence of traditional beauty, wellness and self care, the definition of “beauty” grows into something much more holistic, according to Brok.

“It is truly about well-being,” he said. “We collectively have an opportunity to start to think about what that actually looks like.”

It’ll start small at first, like the hair care category, which five years ago was minuscule in prestige beauty.

“It’s absolutely explosive,” Brok said. “Watch this space.”

>>> What to look at today -23rd of May 2022

Asian stocks traded mixed Monday as investors assess the impact of China’s Covid policies on growth and the outlook for the world’s largest economies. The dollar and Treasuries retreated. Equities rose modestly in Japan, but a slide in Chinese tech stocks and a virus outbreak in Beijing weighed on an MSCI Inc. gauge of the region’s stocks. Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 futures jumped about 1% after the S&P 500 dropped for a seventh straight week in a stretch of weakness not seen since 2001.  Beijing reported a record number of Covid cases, reviving concerns about a lockdown. China’s stringent adherence to Covid Zero has stifled economic growth and prompted banks last week to cut a key interest rate for long-term loans by a record amount. Still, the one-year loan prime rate -- the de facto benchmark lending rate -- was kept unchanged. A dollar gauge declined. The Australian dollar gained after a weekend election delivered a clear outcome, with Labor ousting the Liberal-National coalition. Treasuries pared Friday’s advance as traders debate the Federal Reserve’s tightening path amid mounting worries about an economic slowdown. Bitcoin recovered from some weekend weakness to trade around $30,000. Investors are grappling with concerns about an economic slowdown and prospects for more monetary tightening. The war in Ukraine is fanning commodity prices, and supply chains remain disrupted by China’s adherence to its Covid zero policy. 

Nikkei +0.58% Hang Seng -1.80% CSI -0.87% Shanghai -0.27% Shenzen +0.08%

Eur$ 1.0592 CNH 6.6935 CNY 6.6835 JPY 127.56 GBP 1.2546 CHF 0.9727 RUB 61.3575 TRY 15.9465 WTI$ 111.01 +0.66% Gold 1,855.15 +0.45% BTC 30,140 +0.78% ETH 2,027.55 +1.05%

S&P +1.09% Nasdaq +1.28% EuroStoxx +1.32% FTSE +0.88% Dax +1.43% SMI +1.04%

Macro :
- US Growth Seen Outpacing China’s for First Time Since 1976
- More Horrors Await After $550 Billion Retail Earnings Meltdown
- Hedge Fund Up 138% This Year Is Turning Bullish on China Stocks
- Lagarde Says Crypto Is ‘Worth Nothing’ and Should Be Regulated --> Digital Euro is coming but not a BTC killer, even maybe the opposite, Digital is the first step to prepare the big Haircut
- Anatole Hedge Fund Stems Losses After ‘Disastrous’ China Bets

Keep an eye on :
- ADEN SW : Randstad Outpaces Adecco in 1Q But War Menaces Staffers' Growth
- AIR FP : Airbus to amass €10bn as protection against future crises - FT
- ALC SW : Alcon to Buy Eysuvis, Inveltys Brands From Kala for $60M Upfront
- AMBUB DC : New Ambu CEO Says Confidence-Rebuilding a Top Priority: Borsen
- AMS SW : Ams-OSRAM Supervisory Board to Name Margarete Haase Chairwoman
- AXL US : American Axle Says Not Engaged in Process to Sell Company
- COTN SW : Comet Names Stephan Haferl as New CEO to Succeed Kevin Crofton
- ENI IM : Italy Can End Russia Gas Imports By Winter 2024-25, Eni CEO Says
- ENI IM : Eni Plans EU2.5-Billion in UK Investment Over Four Years: FT
- ENT LN : ENT LN, FLTR LN (Says Crown Resorts shareholder approval of takeover by Blackstone spurred talk of consolidation in the industry)
- ERICB SS : Ericsson, Vonage Push Back Termination Date of $6.2 Billion Deal
- EVHM RU : Swiss Unfreeze Accounts as Melnichenko’s Wife Takes Control: T-A
- SGRE SM : Siemens Energy Takeover of Gamesa to Speed Resolving Issues: CEO
- IDIA SW : Idorsia Precision Phase 3 Meets Primary, Key Secondary Endpoints
- LEO GY : Leoni in Advanced Talks on Further Financing
- NEX LN : National Express Confirms Combination With Stagecoach Lapsed
- OMV AV : OMV Makes Russia Gas Payment in Euros, Sees Obligation Fulfilled
- POG LN : UMMC May Bid for Petropavlovsk’s Gold Assets: Kommersant
- RNO FP : Renault CEO De Meo May Visit Japan Again in June, Reuters Says
- RENE PL : REN 1Q Net Income EU6M Vs. EU4.5M Y/y
- ENR GY : Siemens Energy to Offer 18.05 Euros Per Share in Gamesa Takeover
- TSCO LN : Mayfair-based hedge fund Marshall Wace emerges with a £100m bet against Tesco, Britain's biggest supermarket
- DG FP : Vinci Construction France Faces Corruption Charges: AFP
- VOW GY : Audi Apologizes Over China Advert’s Potential Copyright Breach

>>> Europe : Brokers & Downgrades - 23rd of May 2022

>>> Up
* BEWi Raised to Buy at Pareto Securities; PT 83 kroner
* Calida Raised to Buy at Research Partners; PT 65 Swiss francs
* Deutsche Bank Raised to Outperform at KBW; PT 14.80 euros
* DSV Raised to Buy at HSBC; PT 1,500 kroner
* Gjensidige Raised to Buy at HSBC; PT 230 kroner
* Kuehne + Nagel Raised to Buy at HSBC; PT 320 Swiss francs
* Shaftesbury Raised to Add at Numis; PT 640 pence
* Tryg Raised to Buy at HSBC; PT 185 kroner

>>> Down
* Capricorn Energy Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 243 pence
* Eli Lilly Reinstated Outperform at SVB; PT $341
* Equinor Cut to Hold at SocGen
* Hunting Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 310 pence
* Intertek Cut to Hold at Stifel; PT 5,500 pence
* Lululemon Cut to Neutral at KGI Securities; PT $271
* Nike Cut to Neutral at KGI Securities; PT $106
* Publicis Cut to Underweight at Morgan Stanley; PT 48 euros
* Sanofi Reinstated Outperform at SVB; PT 121 euros
* WPP Cut to Underweight at Morgan Stanley; PT 850 pence

>>> Initiation
* Gilead Reinstated Market Perform at SVB; PT $68

>>> Call
* Deutsche Bank Up to Outperform on Cheap Valuation, KBW Says
* WPP, Publicis Cut at Morgan Stanley as Global Slowdown to Bite

FT : IMF head warns of ‘biggest test since second world war’

IMF head warns of ‘biggest test since second world war’
Kristalina Georgieva says Ukraine conflict is ‘devastating lives, dragging down growth and pushing up inflation’

The head of the IMF has warned at the start of the World Economic Forum in Davos that the global economy faces perhaps its “biggest test since the second world war”.

Kristalina Georgieva, IMF managing director, said Russia’s invasion was “devastating lives, dragging down growth and pushing up inflation”, and urged countries not to “surrender to the forces of geo-economic fragmentation that will make our world poorer and more dangerous”.

Georgieva’s warning came as Ukraine stepped up its bid to give its citizens hope of a brighter future, if the war can be won, with a $1tn package of reconstruction support, financed from confiscating frozen Russian assets.

Speaking to the Financial Times from the Ukraine House, which has taken over the centre of Davos, Switzerland, Natalie Jaresko, a former finance minister, said the world should support Ukraine’s ideas for reconstruction because “Putin has attacked us all”.

Delivering the message of Ukraine in Davos, the US-born Jaresko, who ran the finance ministry in Kyiv in 2014-16, warned that everyone in the world would soon feel the economic effects of Russia’s invasion.

“From the poorest nations with a food crisis, to the US and EU through oil and gas prices, and to all those wanting to stop climate change, we need Ukraine to prevail,” she said.

She said Ukraine needed hope that reconstruction was possible. “We need to shed the final vestiges of our Soviet inheritance, replacing energy inefficient buildings and communities not built for the people who live there, and build the best urban structures,” Jaresko said in a mission that would take “decades”.

There needs to be a “Marshall plan plus”, she said. “The key issue is to persuade the US and the EU to confiscate the Russian assets that have been frozen along with seeking reparations for the war.”

“I know this is not automatically legal, but we need to start the process now,” she said.

Jaresko has since been the executive director of the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, helping to finance rebuilding after Hurricane Maria in 2017.

She said that with bombs raining down every night across Ukraine, the rebuilding costs were likely to be higher than Kyiv’s current estimates of $560bn to $600bn. “I’m putting this at £1tn,” she said.

It was vital to give Ukrainians hope that a decades-long process of renewal to build a different country would emerge from the violence of the past three months, she said.

In recent days, increasing numbers of economists have become alarmed that the world is sliding towards a recession, with Chinese production falling sharply as it battles coronavirus, Europe suffering from a cost of living crisis, the US moving from boom to bust and emerging markets facing food shortages.

Georgieva urged all countries to lower barriers to trade, help countries in debt distress and modernise cross-border payments systems. But she warned, “there is no silver bullet to address the most destructive forms of fragmentation”.

FT : EU aims to unify capital markets with live trading databases

EU aims to unify capital markets with live trading databases
Brussels believes a so-called ‘consolidated tape’ will make the bloc’s exchanges more attractive to investors

European policymakers are renewing their push for real-time databases of stock and bond trading information, in a bid to rejuvenate the region’s capital markets.

Brussels sees the projects as key to deepening and unifying the EU’s fragmented financial markets — making them more attractive, and safer, for international and retail investors.

Europe is currently a patchwork of more than 470 exchanges and trading venues, which gives investors plenty of choice but little ability to keep track of trading activity and make comparisons.

To overcome this problem, the EU aims to establish live databases — known as a ‘consolidated tape’ — that bundle together basic trading information from the bloc’s competing venues.

Previous efforts to create a pan-European capital market, comparable with the US, repeatedly foundered when they came up against national and commercial interests.

However, in recent weeks, France — while it holds the presidency of the European Council — has been trying to find a consensus between countries that could speed up Europe’s markets reforms, known as the Mifir legislation.

For some, that cannot come too soon. Authorities have estimated the total cost to investors of not having an accurate view of equity prices across the continent is €10.6bn. Efama, a trade group representing some of Europe’s largest fund managers, including M&G, Allianz and Fidelity, has warned that global investors will go elsewhere rather than trade in Europe.

“We are encouraged by recent momentum around the European Commission’s proposal for the reform of Mifir which represents a meaningful step forward in bringing a consolidated tape to Europe’s capital markets,” says Stephen Fisher, managing director of global public policy at fund manager BlackRock.

“We believe that a consolidated tape for equities, bonds and exchange traded funds, constructed in the right way, would increase transparency, protect investors, and improve the competitiveness of European markets for the benefit of Europe’s end-investors.”

With the EU already stung by the loss of the City of London following Brexit, the European Commission — the bloc’s executive body — has made establishing a consolidated tape a central feature of its market reforms.

The tape would record vital data, such as size and price of a deal. It would have separate components for stocks, bonds and ETFs, tailored according to each market’s characteristics.

The Commission wants a near real-time tape for the stock market, but is likely to accept a slower system for fixed income securities, where trades are fewer and often negotiated privately.

Operations would be run by private technology companies overseen by the European Securities and Markets Authority, the pan-European regulator.

These means of recording trading data have been a common feature of US capital markets for decades. But EU capital markets, when measured relative to gross domestic product, are half as big as the UK’s, which are little more than half the size of those in the US, according to London think-tank New Financial.


And, although European live databases were mandated in the EU’s 2018 Mifid rules, private companies have made scant progress in turning them into a reality.

Consolidated tape projects were blocked as private companies proved unwilling to share data cheaply, or the data provision was too slow, or not standardised.

Potential tape operators therefore concluded that it was impossible for them to make a profit, and abandoned their plans. But, undeterred by past experience, Brussels wants projects at least under way by the time of the next European parliament election — the first since Brexit — in 2024.

The need for a consolidated tape is arguably even more pressing in the fixed income market, because of its opaque private deals.

In April, research by investment data managers Finbourne Technology for the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), a bank lobby group, suggested this issue could partly be addressed if trades were published on a near real-time tape.

With the majority of daily corporate bond deals smaller than €500,000, the AFME research found that almost instant reporting would markedly improve fixed income market transparency. A tape would lift the proportion of transactions currently being reported real-time from 8 per cent to almost 70 per cent.

There would need to be deferrals on reporting larger and more illiquid deals, AFME said, as current Mifir proposals would effectively disclose a bank’s private activity to the market. It “would force [banks and brokers] to disclose their books to the market before they have unwound or hedged their positions,” pointed out Adam Farkas, AFME chief executive.

AFME argues that its demand for a deferral for some types of fixed income trades is not particularly onerous. Already, the Mifir proposals allow lengthy deferrals for sovereign bond trades.

Some progress is being made. The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets has agreed high-level technical principles for a corporate bond consolidated tape with many of the industry’s biggest actors. These include Bloomberg, Flow Traders, Tradeweb and Efama.

Agreement regarding a tape for equities may present a bigger problem, though.

The Commission wants all trading venues operating in Europe to supply standardised information on deals to a tape, including those in private marketplaces run by banks and market makers.

But any revenues that a tape accrues would only be shared between regulated exchanges. None would go to the other marketplaces mandated to supply their data.

Efama says that is tantamount to a subsidy to exchanges: “The raison d’être of the tape is to support capital market functioning in the EU and thereby improve issuer and investor outcomes,” it notes. “It should not be designed to subsidise the operating models of intermediaries like the main stock exchanges.”

The cost to build and run a consolidated tape is also disputed. Adamantia, a Paris-based business management consultancy, has put the cost to build an equity tape at €17mn, with annual running costs of €16mn That is far higher than the EU’s projections of €2.4mn to build and €5.5mn a year to run. This could may make it an unaffordable project for small companies to take on.

Efama says regulators should cap the price for a tape to “a reasonable commercial basis” to encourage users. But, if no commercial company emerges, it is expected that Esma, the pan-European regulator, will run the tapes.

That leaves a question mark over when a consolidated tape might emerge. Brussels has a crowded legislative agenda and updated markets rules must compete for space with other financial services legislation governing insurance and sustainability.

Nevertheless, few lobbyists in Brussels doubt that a consolidated tape will arrive. The political will from the EU to introduce them is too strong, they say. Even so, every detail in their construction will be hard fought in front of regulators. Whatever the EU agrees, it is likely to disappoint some part of the market.

FT : Why seizing and selling Russian assets is dogged by legal issues

Why seizing and selling Russian assets is dogged by legal issues
Several EU capitals are pressing for Russian assets to be used to pay for Ukraine’s reconstruction

One idea that may pop up in the various forums ahead of next week’s EU summit is the idea of seizing and selling off Russian assets to pay for Ukraine’s reconstruction.

We’ll also look at what finance ministers meeting in Brussels today and tomorrow for their regular eurogroup-Ecofin combo are likely to discuss. One emerging prospect is the need for an extra EU budgetary top-up, given all the Ukraine-related expenditure, as the FT reports.

And with the World Trade Organization’s ministerial meeting fast approaching, we examine its checklist of reforms.

EU institutions (and some capitals) are engaging in the tradition of faire le pont (around Ascension day, for those observing), so we’ll be off on Thursday and Friday, and back in your inboxes on Monday.

To confiscate or not; that is the question
Valdis Dombrovskis, European Commission executive vice-president, struck an uncompromising note last week when asked about the idea of confiscating Russian assets to pay for the reconstruction of Ukraine, writes Sam Fleming in Brussels.

There was, he said, a principle of “aggressor pays” that applies, as he called for the net to be cast wide when it comes to examining the confiscation of both private and public Russian assets. “We must make Russia pay for the damage it is creating,” the Latvian commissioner said.

Behind the scenes, the topic is proving a divisive one between member states, some of which are wary of the legal and political tripwires the EU will encounter as it examines asset confiscation.

Diplomats last week debated whether asset confiscation should be discussed at EU leaders’ level as soon as this month’s European Council meeting, after the topic appeared on draft summit conclusions. Opinions varied sharply.

As a reminder, there are two main avenues for Ukraine’s allies to pursue here: either confiscating the frozen assets of Russian oligarchs who have been placed under sanctions, or seeking to liquidate some of the frozen assets of the Russian central bank.

The former route is less lucrative in terms of the money raised, but it may be legally easier to pull off than the latter, which would mark an extraordinary precedent and raise complications within international law.

The draft European Council conclusions would have EU leaders welcoming “efforts made with a view to providing for appropriate confiscation measures, including exploring options aimed at using frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine’s reconstruction”.

But in a meeting of EU diplomats on Friday a number of member states sounded wary about the idea of having a leaders’ debate on the topic, according to people familiar with the meeting, noting how delicate it is, as well as the need to ensure compliance with national and international law.

Among the countries that are cautious in this area is Germany, where even enforcement of asset freezes is patchy, because of constitutional law restrictions. The country’s fundamental law explicitly says that expropriation by the government can occur only “for the public good” and must be combined with compensation — which could open the door for massive compensation lawsuits from Russians hit with sanctions.

The upshot is that it is not yet clear if the wording will make it on to the EU leaders’ menu when they gather a week from now.

That said, the commission is pretty active in this area already. This week it is due to propose a new directive on asset recovery and confiscation, along with a council proposal on adding the evasion or violation of sanctions to criminal law.

The latter is important, because it is easier to engineer the seizure of assets as part of a criminal process, and not all member states currently have sanctions evasion on their list of offences.

WSJ : Sex, Money and Fashion: Luxury Label Balenciaga Fetishizes Suiting at the

Sex, Money and Fashion: Luxury Label Balenciaga Fetishizes Suiting at the New York Stock Exchange
The French brand showed its spring 2023 collection, which includes latex fetish bodysuits, at the iconic Wall Street landmark

Were the models at Sunday’s Balenciaga show the first people to wear latex fetish bodysuits on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange? Impossible to fact-check, yet it was certainly one of the riskier moments in the exchange’s 230-year history.

The French luxury label certainly chose a grabby location at which to reveal its spring 2023 collection. An off-calendar show, it is the first Balenciaga show in New York since 2003 and select pieces are to be sold immediately at the brand’s website and at its Madison Avenue store. Following a week in which the S&P 500 ended down 19% from its Jan. 3 record—nearing the 20% that would tip it into a bear market—the stack of fake dollar bills that served as the show’s invitation felt particularly poignant.

Showgoers were seated throughout the actual stock-exchange floor, a first for a brand and a coup for a French brand that illustrates Balenciaga’s muscle as a force within the Kering group. The show started with the ceremonial ringing of the floor’s bell and the typical agitation of the trading screens was heightened during the show when they began to flicker (an intentional disruption).
Backstage, after he greeted guest and sometime collaborator Kanye West, the brand’s creative director, Demna (who goes by a mononym), was himself wearing one of the collection’s constricting latex pieces. He said the pieces, which cover the entire head leaving holes only for the eyes and mouth, were about erasing the identity of the person wearing it. He admitted that it was quite hot, and that he’d be removing it as soon as possible.

Blotting the bits of his face he could with a tissue, Demna said the fetish bodysuits connected to the show’s NYSE location because “money is a fetish, probably the biggest one in the world in a perverted way.”

Demna said he wanted to show at “the epicenter of capitalism” because “I think money and identity are very, very connected in a weird way and not necessarily a very healthy way.”

For a brand that is committed to expanding its market in the U.S., it may be counterproductive to instigate a critique of capitalism. But as Demna showed at his fall 2022 show, a searing statement on refugees and Ukraine, he is not afraid to wade into moral and philosophical ambiguity.

In a practical sense those dark, tight fetish suits also served to stylistically unify a collection that held two distinct parts: a new “Garde Robe” subcollection of refined classic suiting and separates for all genders, and a collaboration with Adidas that spun the classic tracksuit into oversized, ironic funhouse versions of the classic. Pieces like a navy trench, pussy-bow blouses in beige and navy silk, and roomy blazers were surprisingly classic for a brand that is at the forefront of hype conceptually.

One top-handle purse shown is called, appropriately, “The Money Bag.” Oversized pumps for women and brogues for men may be a harder pill to swallow as I can’t think of anyone outside the clown community who wants their feet to appear larger.

Drawing a connection between the collection and the show’s location, Demna summed it up: “It’s all about the money, right?”

WSJ : Broadcom in Advanced Talks to Buy VMware

Broadcom in Advanced Talks to Buy VMware
The tech companies are discussing a cash-and-stock deal that could come soon

Broadcom Inc. AVGO -0.55% is in advanced talks to buy VMware Inc., VMW 0.80% according to people familiar with the matter, setting the stage for what would be one of the year’s biggest deals.

The technology companies are discussing a cash-and-stock deal that could come soon, assuming the talks don’t fall apart, the people said. VMware has a market value of $40 billion, while Broadcom’s is around $222 billion.

The deal discussions, which picked up pace in recent days, come roughly six months after computing pioneer Dell Technologies Inc. DELL -2.55% spun off its 81% equity stake in VMware.

Bloomberg earlier reported on the talks.

VMware has a strong position in the market for “hybrid” cloud, where large companies mix public cloud services like those of Amazon.com Inc. and Microsoft Corp. MSFT -0.23% with their own private networks.

Broadcom, a semiconductor powerhouse built largely through acquisitions, has been on the hunt for a deal to beef up its presence in the corporate-software market. It came close to buying the closely held software company SAS Institute Inc. last year before SAS’s founders had a change of heart. Its first big foray into software was its roughly $19 billion acquisition of CA Technologies in 2018.

The demand for cloud computing, which enables customers to rent computing horsepower rather than invest in their own, has exploded in recent years. Startups and other businesses that couldn’t support in-house IT departments were among the earliest cloud adopters, but now companies across nearly every industry rely on cloud services.

Dell completed the spinoff of its VMware stake in November. VMware shareholders, including Dell, got an $11.5 billion cash dividend. Dell used the funds to pay down debt and said the deal positioned it to grow in new markets. Michael Dell, the company’s founder, chairman and chief executive, remained chair of VMware.

VMware is roughly a year into a new regime after company veteran Raghu Raghuram took over following the departure of CEO Pat Gelsinger, who left to run Intel Corp.

VMware is set to report earnings Thursday, while Broadcom is set to report earnings next week.

A market downturn that has sent stock prices lower has made it harder to strike deals and finance them. Deal volume is down roughly 25% so far this year compared with last year, according to Dealogic. Microsoft Corp.’s roughly $75 billion acquisition of videogame heavyweight Activision Blizzard Inc. registers as the largest of 2022 so far.

>>> Morgan Stanley: We Are About To Find Out The Cost Of Remodeling A Global Eco

Morgan Stanley: We Are About To Find Out The Cost Of Remodeling A Global Economy

By Michael Zezas, Head of Public Policy Research at Morgan Stanley

What’s the cost of remodeling a global economy? What’s the benefit? Ready or not, we’re about to find out. Why? Because geopolitical events are accelerating important secular trends:
  1. The “slowbalization” of economic and national interests eating away at globalization; and
  2. The shift from a single economic power base and set of rules to a “multipolar world.”
While the sell-off in risk markets is getting attention now, our conversations with corporate decision-makers and policy-makers are increasingly taken up with how to deal with these two important and overlapping transitions. These decisions have long-term consequences, so investors need to understand how their choices may play out.
Our latest Blue Paper is a guide to navigating these secular trends, with frameworks we developed in 2019 ("The Slowbalization Playbook") and 2020 ("Investing for a Multipolar World", both reports are available to zerohedge professional subscribers). For the sake of your Sunday, here’s what you need to know, in brief:
  • Geopolitics are accelerating slowbalization and the multipolar world, providing more incentives to near-shore or “friend-shore” supply chains: To be clear, these trends didn’t start with Russia invading Ukraine or even US/China trade tensions. Services trade was already outpacing goods trade, and automation has been reducing the primacy of low-cost labor. But the incentives for companies and policy-makers to rethink globalization have been amplified by recent geopolitical developments. A bipartisan consensus emerged in the US around an existential need to outcompete China. The result in 2018 was tariff and non-tariff barriers (i.e., export restrictions), the latter meant to protect the US advantage in key technologies. We expect these barriers to endure and boost costs beyond the directly taxed sectors, like semis, to industries like auto batteries and AI that are adopting these new technologies. The pandemic served painful notice for some sectors that paying up for ”just in case” instead of “just in time” inventories might be the only way to avoid the supply chain bottlenecks caused by lockdowns, mask mandates, or other restrictions. And Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent sanctions cut off exports of energy and agricultural products to Europe and other parts of the globe. Relying on allies rather than rivals yields supply chain security.
  • With transitions come costs and lingering inflation… Consider that Europe now is eager to build infrastructure to import natural gas from the US to avoid reliance on Russia. Or consider a hypothetical American multinational moving some of its production out of China to avoid new US export controls. This shift comes not only with a cost but also fresh uncertainties around labor and infrastructure in the new locale. Our equity research colleagues believe that profit margins could face headwinds in sectors like European chemicals, European and Asian midstream and downstream natural gas utilities, auto OEMs, consumer staples, portions of leisure, and transportation.
  • ...but transitions also drive opportunity. All this "geopolitical capex" has to drive capital somewhere. Some geographies and sectors are likely beneficiaries: For US and European companies, friend-shoring is more attractive in countries with larger labor pools, competitive wage costs, and trade agreements with key end markets. In varying ways and to varying degrees, Mexico, India, and Turkey are recipient candidates. And regardless of the location, building these new supply chains will almost surely drive a pick-up in demand – and profits – in sectors like semiconductor capital equipment, automation, clean tech, defense/cybersecurity, industrial gases, cap goods, and metals/mining.
Of course, this transition is a multi-year project. And as in any remodel, we expect many hidden costs and benefits to emerge along the way. We’ll keep updating our playbook, and you, as we move through the process.