>>> >>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications
DAX:
Continental (CON TH) +1.5%
Continental Raised to Outperform at Exane; PT 91 euros
Deutsche Bank (DBK TH) -1.2%
MDAX:
Commerzbank (CBK TH) -0.8%
Irish Government Joins European Bank Share Sale Spree: ECM Watch
Rheinmetall (RHM TH) -1.1%
Delivery Hero (DHER TH) -1.6%
SDAX:
Heidelberger Druck (HDD TH) +1.2%
flatexDEGIRO (FTK TH) -1.3%
FlatexDegiro Fined EU2m by Dutch Regulator for Reporting Errors
Adler Group (ADJ TH) -4.9%

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • H&M (HMSB TH) +4.4%
    • *H&M 2Q PRETAX SEK4.78B, EST. SEK3.98B
  • E.On (EOAN TH) -1.1%
  • Deutsche Bank (DBK TH) -1.2%
  • Adidas (ADS TH) -1.2%
  • Vodafone (VODI TH) -1.3%
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) -1.6%
  • HelloFresh (HFG TH) -1.8%
  • Renault (RNL TH) -1.8%
  • Delivery Hero (DHER TH) -1.9%
  • Pearson (PES TH) -2.5%
  • Grifols (OZTA TH) -3.3%
    • Grifols in Talks With Funds to Raise Up to EU2b: Confidencial

WSJ : Meta, TikTok Could Face Civil Liability for Addicting Children in Californ

Meta, TikTok Could Face Civil Liability for Addicting Children in California
Social-media platforms are lobbying to stop first-in-the-nation proposal allowing government attorneys to sue them for features alleged to harm minors

SACRAMENTO, Calif.—Social-media companies such as Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. META -5.20%▼ could be sued by government attorneys in California for features that allegedly harm children through addiction under a first-in-the-nation bill that cleared a crucial vote in the state Senate late Tuesday.

The measure would permit the state attorney general, local district attorneys and the city attorneys of California’s four largest cities to sue social-media companies including Meta—which also owns Instagram—as well as TikTok, owned by Chinese company ByteDance Ltd., and Snap Inc. SNAP -5.70%▼ under the state’s law governing unfair business practices. The bill would allow lawsuits if a prosecutor believes a company employed features it knew or should have known would addict minors.

The bill passed in California’s Senate Judiciary Committee by a vote of 8-0. Youth advocates, teacher’s unions and consumer groups spoke in support of the bill during a hearing earlier in the day.

Activist Larissa May told lawmakers that at one point during college, she was spending more than 14 hours a day in one social media app.

“I was addicted to the place that was killing me, that was reminding me of who I would never become, what I would never look,” she said. “There needs to be some accountability. The more that we suffer, the more money that they make.”

Dylan Hoffman, executive director for California and the Southwest at the industry group Technet, testified that the measure would violate free speech rights because algorithms used to curate content on social media platforms are a protected form of speech.

In a version of the bill that passed the state Assembly in May, parents would have been able to sue the companies for harm to their children, with a minimum $1,000 payout for a claimant in class-action lawsuits. Addiction was defined as the use of social media that is difficult to reduce despite a desire to do so and that causes physical, mental, emotional, developmental or material harms.

But after lobbying from business and tech-industry groups, the chairman of the state Senate Judiciary Committee and the bill’s author agreed this past weekend to amend the bill so that only government attorneys can file the suits.

Tech companies would still face civil penalties of up to $25,000 for a violation or $250,000 if they are shown to have knowingly employed harmful features. A provision that would have allowed retroactive lawsuits was removed.

The measure will now head to the state Senate Appropriations Committee and, if it advances, to the full Senate, where it must be approved before the end of the legislative session in August. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom hasn’t taken a public position.

In an interview before the changes made over the weekend, Mr. Hoffman said the bill would potentially open companies to hundreds of millions of dollars in liability and prompt them to abandon the youth market nationwide.

“How do you geofence this just to California? We’re talking about websites and platforms that aren’t only across all of the states, but across all of the world,” he said.

Mr. Hoffman said Technet members would prefer to work with legislators on a separate bill regulating design features for children, which also passed the Judiciary Committee Tuesday.

Mr. Hoffman said Technet is still evaluating the proposed amendments and declined to comment on how they might affect the group’s view of the bill.

Representatives for Snap, Twitter Inc. and ByteDance declined to comment on the bill. A Meta representative said the measure would do nothing to encourage companies to make meaningful changes.

Internet-privacy advocates including the Electronic Frontier Foundation have also opposed the legislation, saying it could blur the line between product liability and freedom of speech.

Assemblyman Jordan Cunningham, a Republican who authored the legislation, said it is needed because social-media companies try to maximize children’s time on their platforms despite negative mental-health consequences.

“I don’t care if at the end of the day, nobody gets sued,” he said. “I just want to create the financial incentives for them to stop using features that are harming children.”

Reporting by The Wall Street Journal last year and congressional hearings that followed revealed internal research from Facebook suggesting the company knew its algorithms were harming children by contributing to mental-health issues, particularly among teen girls. Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg has said the hearings painted a false picture of Meta, and company representatives have said the research on the harms of social-media use is inconclusive.

California’s proposal is the latest example of state lawmakers’ attempts to regulate social-media companies as federal legislation remains stalled. A bill that died in the Minnesota Legislature this year would have banned the use of social-media algorithms on children.

Despite a flurry of one-on-one meetings with California state legislators last month, tech lobbyists were unable to stop the bill from passing on a bipartisan 51-0 vote in the state Assembly. About two dozen Assembly members abstained.

Meta, Twitter and Snap have individually lobbied against the California measure, according to state lobbying disclosures. Meta has taken a lead role in pressuring lawmakers to oppose the legislation, according to several people who work in the legislature.

Meta says it has tightened age-verification protocols on Instagram, provided “nudges” that prompt teens away from certain topics if they have been scrolling through for a significant time, and it now allows parents to block children’s access to the app during certain times of day.

“We want to make sure that the people on our platforms have a safe and positive experience,” said Jennifer Hanley, Meta’s North American head of safety.

WWD : How a Creative Agency Is Helping Luxury Brands to Understand the Metaverse

How a Creative Agency Is Helping Luxury Brands to Understand the Metaverse
Paris-based Al Dente has developed a game to help employees at luxury groups like Kering to get to grips with Web3 — and NFTs are next.
PARIS — Patrizio Miceli, head of creative agency Al Dente, has spent the last year helping luxury brands prepare for the Web3 revolution. Metaverse, NFTs, cryptocurrencies and gaming are the new buzzwords feeding the conversation, but he quickly realized that not everyone understands the language.
Al Dente’s solution was to develop “The Serious Game,” which allows firms to familiarize their employees with the next iteration of the internet and identify communities of Web3 enthusiasts within their ranks. “Because the only way to understand this space is to experience it,” Miceli explained.
The first to offer the game on social platform Discord was French luxury group Kering, the owner of brands including Gucci, Balenciaga, Saint Laurent and Bottega Veneta.


“They thought 300 people would sign up. They ended up with 2,000 participants,” Miceli said. “We’re in a ‘test and learn’ phase with some brands on very sophisticated ideas. But we realized the first priority today is to help luxury groups understand the subject in-depth, so they can exchange between services and work off the same knowledge base to move forward.”


A Snowy Owl NFT from Al Dente’s “The Serious Game.”
COURTESY OF KERING
Al Dente aims to further rally the luxury community around the metaverse with its own line of NFTs, developed with Dazed fashion director Imruh Asha, launching next fall.
“‘The New Face’ aims to create the first meta-luxury community made up of executives and designers from the worlds of fashion, luxury and Web3. Access will initially be through referrals to enable creative and prolific interactions between these worlds,” Miceli said.
According to a new report by Morgan Stanley, social gaming could add up to $20 billion to the luxury sector’s total addressable market, while NFTs in the form of luxury collectibles could become a $25 billion business in Morgan Stanley’s “blue-sky analysis.”
Miceli spoke to WWD about how luxury brands can navigate the metaverse jungle, how the new technology will impact e-commerce and how digital identities will evolve in a post-physical world.
WWD: What have you been doing in the last year to establish Al Dente as an authority on the metaverse?
Patrizio Miceli: After charging full speed ahead, we’re taking a step back on certain subjects that are taking much longer than expected, namely the actual definition of the metaverse.
The interconnection between all the metaverses and the physical world does not yet exist, and won’t exist until a few years from now.
The world of metaverses has not yet been consolidated. Rather, we’re in a phase where we’re seeing metaverses emerge based on functionalities. Some are more gaming-oriented, others are more social platforms, some are there primarily to showcase art. Just as there are dozens of tokens being launched every week, there are dozens of metaverses popping up. Our role is to act as homing devices for brands to analyze all the possibilities and come back with concrete strategies, and to have the capabilities to execute them in-house.
We’re working with most of the [luxury] groups on concrete projects to develop NFTs and the metaverse.
Patrizio Miceli
PHOTOGRAPH BY JD/COURTESY OF AL DENTE
WWD: Why was it important for Al Dente to have its own plot in The Sandbox, the community-driven platform that allows players to build, own and monetize their gaming experiences?


P.M.: It was important to be able to do “test and learn” experiments for brands. We need to experience and find out things for ourselves.
The founding principle of Web3 is decentralization. Metaverses are concentrations of communities in spaces that have tokens.
That’s one of the things that we explain to brands, that customers have become shareholders.
We have to find metaverses that are in line with the aesthetics of luxury and offer fluid navigation. It’s still some time before millions of people can connect live to a 3D world.
Metaverse experiences should incorporate the aesthetic aspect, architecture, community and gaming. Those are the key ingredients.
WWD: How will the metaverse change e-commerce?
P.M.: E-commerce is about to undergo a profound transformation.
In the future, brands will have two websites, one in Web2 and one in Web3. The Web3 sites will be a fantastic revolution because luxury brands have always struggled to recreate the in-store experience online.
What’s considered a satisfying experience in Web2 is to buy an item with as few clicks as possible. It’s not about the brand experience.
The great strength of Web3 will be to amplify the physical experience with a vision steeped in community and gaming.
You’ll have an experience that’s different from the traditional retail experience, but just as powerful emotionally.
An NFT from Al Dente’s upcoming line “The New Face.”
COURTESY OF AL DENTE
WWD: Tell us about your new line of NFTs.
P.M.: We plan to launch our line of NFTs in September. We’ve been working on it for four months.
We worked with Imruh Asha, the fashion editor of Dazed, and a lab specialized in 3D realism, to develop a line of masks. And behind this line of NFTs, there’s a roadmap that will incorporate philanthropic collaborations.
It’s going to be the first line of 3D realistic NFTs autogenerated from 356 traits, which can be combined with 60 preset colors and materials. A computer algorithm combines them. We’re going to produce roughly 2,500 NFTs.
The line is designed to help people in the fashion industry become more receptive to the new aesthetics born of Web3.
We’re going to put them in touch with new talents and launch collaborations with brands and charities.


The NFT line is called “The New Face” because it’s going to redefine digital identities through these highly creative masks. It’s a nod to the new faces board at modeling agencies, which people are always looking at to find the next big thing. Web3 is going to usher in a whole new aesthetic.

FT : UK plans to cut pipelines to EU if Russia gas crisis intensifies

UK plans to cut pipelines to EU if Russia gas crisis intensifies
Britain would cut two-way interconnectors to Belgium and Netherlands in event of severe shortages

The UK will cut off gas supplies to mainland Europe if it is hit by severe shortages under an emergency plan that energy companies warn risks exacerbating a crisis on the continent.

With European countries facing the prospect of Russia severing gas exports, the British plan to shut off pipelines to the Netherlands and Belgium risks undermining a push for international co-operation on energy.

A cut off of so-called interconnector pipelines would be among the early measures under the UK’s emergency gas plan, which could be triggered by National Grid if supplies fall short in the coming months.


European gas companies have appealed to the UK to work with the EU and warned shutting off interconnectors could backfire if prolonged shortages occur. Britain imports large volumes of gas from the continent at the height of winter.

“I would definitely recommend they [the UK] reconsider stopping the interconnection [in the event of a crisis],” said Bart Jan Hoevers, president of the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas, a powerful group whose members include Italy’s Snam and Fluxys of Belgium.

“Because while it is beneficial for the continent in the summer it is also beneficial for the UK in the winter.”

The UK will stress-test its emergency gas shortage plan in September. National Grid said the plan was tested annually, adding that the latest exercise would “reflect the circumstances” as Russia curtails gas exports to Europe.

The pipelines would be cut as part of a four-step emergency plan if there was a severe shortage of supplies that led to a loss of pressure on the gas system. Other emergency measures include shutting off supplies to large industrial users and appealing to households to reduce consumption.

Germany and the Netherlands this month triggered their own emergency plans, restarting coal plants and urging industry to cut gas usage after Russia cut gas exports.

Since March, two undersea pipelines connecting Britain with Belgium and the Netherlands have been working at maximum capacity, exporting 75mn cubic metres a day of gas to the continent as Europe rushes to build a storage buffer against further Russian cuts.

The UK has minimal gas storage capacity so excess supplies, including imported cargoes of liquefied natural gas (LNG), are sent to the continent when demand is low in the summer months.

But during very cold winter spells, such as the ‘Beast from the East’ storm in 2018, the UK has received as much as 20-25 per cent of its gas through its two-way interconnectors with EU countries, according to analysts.

Hoevers cautioned that most countries’ emergency protocols were ill-suited for responding to a geopolitical crisis, because they were originally designed to cope with “shorter-term interruptions” such as a malfunction at a gasfield or import terminal, not a prolonged loss of supplies.

Across Europe there “needs to be political arrangements in place to know what we can expect from each other as neighbouring countries in case of a severe crisis,” he said.

The UK government said it was “fully confident” about the security of energy supply heading into the winter, arguing it had “one of the most reliable and diverse energy systems in the world.”

It said it believed a gas emergency was “extremely unlikely”.

FT : Hedge fund manager Jim Chanos’ next ‘big short’ is data centres

Hedge fund manager Jim Chanos’ next ‘big short’ is data centres
Short seller bets against Reits that own big server warehouses on risks that customers will become rivals

Short seller Jim Chanos is betting against “legacy” data centres that now face growing competition from the trio of tech giants that have been their biggest customers.

Chanos, who remains best-known for predicting the collapse of energy group Enron two decades ago, is raising several hundred million dollars for a fund that will take short positions in US-listed real estate investment trusts.

“This is our big short right now,” Chanos said in an interview. “The story is that although the cloud is growing, the cloud is their enemy, not their business. Value is accruing to the cloud companies, not the bricks-and-mortar legacy data centres.”

Data centres owned by groups such as Digital Realty Trust and Equinix are vast warehouses of servers that power large swaths of the internet.

The growth in demand for data centres has been a big theme for institutional investors, who are seeking to tap into the global expansion of cloud computing. Last year $915bn alternatives manager Blackstone bought QTS Realty Trust for around $10bn, at the time the largest deal in data centre history.

Mike Forman managing director of Blackstone Real Estate, said in February that the deal was designed to capitalise on “exponential” growth in data creation and storage requirements. “‘The cloud’ is not literally in the clouds; it is in physical datacentre assets. This all translates into unprecedented demand for data centres that is expected to grow at double-digit rates over the next decade in the US and internationally.”

The three biggest cloud providers, Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure, are by far the largest tenants of data centres. Chanos’ thesis is that these three “hyperscalers” prefer to build data centres to their own design rather than moving into existing ones; and when they do outsource, they typically offer low returns to their development partners. Chanos also said he believes that the real estate investment trusts are overvalued and are in for a period of declining revenue and earnings growth.

“The real problem for data centre Reits is technical obsolescence,” said Chanos. “Their three biggest customers are becoming their biggest competitors. And when your biggest competitors are three of the most vicious competitors in the world then you have a problem.”

Chanos has built a career out of trying to identify corporate disasters-in-the making. In 2020 he made $100mn from shorting the Germany payments company Wirecard, which filed for bankruptcy that year after admitting that €1.9bn of its cash probably did “not exist”. But he has also been burnt by a high-profile short position in Elon Musk’s electric carmaker Tesla, whose share price has soared.

The past decade has been a challenging one for short sellers, as trillions of dollars of central bank stimulus turbocharged a bull market for US equities and lifted asset prices indiscriminately across the board. Chanos has struggled to raise money in this environment: the firm’s assets peaked at around $7bn after 2008 when its short-only Ursus fund — named after the Latin for “bear” — gained 44 per cent net of fees, and have been slowly declining since then. The firm now runs around $500mn.

In 2020 Chanos sold a minority stake in the management company to boutique investment firm Conlon & Co. Since then he has hired a team of options traders to help structure its short positions and rebranded Kynikos Associates, the investment firm he launched in 1985, as Chanos & Company.

Chanos said that years of soaring equity valuations have made investors complacent. “One of the things that amazes me is how sanguine inventors are,” he said. “People just shrug their shoulders and don’t seem to notice where equity valuations are today versus historically and that there are so many flawed business models. It’s a little bit baffling that no one seems to think they need financial insurance because it’s pretty cheap. It’s another reason to be more cautious — no one is beating down the door of short sellers these days.” 

Tech stocks have been pummeled this year as investors grapple with higher inflation and interest rates. This has been a boost to Chanos, who has described the current environment as “the dotcom era on steroids,” luring investor capital into lossmaking unicorns, special purpose acquisition companies, cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens.

This year Ursus is up about 30 per cent, compared with a fall of more than 25 per cent for the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite share index. Two of the biggest contributors to the fund’s performance have been its short positions in cryptocurrency exchange platform Coinbase, and online used car retailer Carvana, both of which have suffered steep losses. Meanwhile a “tail risk” strategy, designed to protect investors against extreme events, is up more than 200 per cent in the same period.

Chanos believes that as the market cycle turns and a sell-off in stock markets continues, it will be a fertile environment for short sellers: “We’ll be feasting on the returns of these stock ideas for years — very similar to the post-dotcom era.” 

FT : DWS woes put spotlight on the limits of its independence

DWS woes put spotlight on the limits of its independence
Asset manager is listed but German corporate structure allows parent Deutsche Bank to call the shots

When Deutsche Bank listed its asset management arm DWS in 2018, it thought it had engineered a neat solution for a strategic problem.

Unshackled from its scandal-prone parent, the value of one of Europe’s biggest fund managers should become more visible. It would also raise capital for Deutsche without diluting its own shareholder base. And equipped with its own shares as a valuable acquisition currency, DWS could also lead the consolidation in global asset management.

Four years on, the disappointing record of DWS has fallen very far below that vision. Its chief executive has departed in the wake of a “greenwashing” scandal and its shares are trading 20 per cent below the flotation price.

That has left Deutsche open to scrutiny on the lender’s enduring influence over its subsidiary and whether the structure it chose for the listing befits what is meant to be a champion of shareholders’ rights in Europe.

Such concerns have been underlined by the rapid appointment of Deutsche Bank manager Stefan Hoops as DWS chief executive in early June. The 42-year-old former investment banker and longtime confidant of Deutsche Bank chief executive Christian Sewing was parachuted in to replace Asoka Wöhrmann, despite not having much of an asset management background.

Wöhrmann resigned hours after the company’s offices in Frankfurt were raided by police investigating claims it had misstated its record on investing on environmental, social and governance criteria — allegations that Deutsche and DWS continue to deny.

Unlike the process for public companies in other markets, Hoops was appointed chief executive without the need to seek approval from all shareholders because of the idiosyncratic German structure that Deutsche chose for the DWS listing, known as a KGaA. It combines elements of a limited partnership and a stock corporation. In effect, the influence of minority shareholders is small.

The supervisory board, which is elected by shareholders, has very limited power. In contrast to ordinary joint stock companies, it has no say in appointing and demoting executive board members and cannot block crucial corporate decisions such as on mergers. It is the “general partner” in the KGaA — Deutsche Bank in the DWS case — that can call the shots.

Deutsche Bank said the appointment of Hoops was the result of “a proper selection process”, which did involve a headhunter. However, it declined to disclose when the process started, who the headhunter was and if external candidates were considered. The lender said that Hoops was chosen because of his “outstanding capital market expertise, a deep understanding of customers and excellent leadership qualities”. 

Whether Hoops turns out to be the right man for the job at DWS, it was a demonstration of Deutsche’s control over its subsidiary.

Desiree Fixler, the former head of ESG at DWS who raised the greenwashing allegations at the fund manager, said the notion of the company’s independence from Deutsche was always “a mirage”. “In my experience, there was no separation at all between Deutsche Bank and DWS,” she told the Financial Times.

Deutsche Bank rejects the notion that it is having undue influence over DWS, arguing that the KGaA structure was “completely common” in the German corporate landscape. External investors and corporate governance experts, however, have long raised concerns over the governance set-up.

“We don’t like the KGaA structure from a corporate governance perspective,” Janne Werning, head of ESG Capital Markets & Stewardship at Union Investment, told the FT, adding that it “unduly restricts shareholders’ rights and makes it difficult for DWS to be perceived as a company in its own right”.

The structure makes issues such as corporate strategy or deciding on a chief executive particularly sensitive. In 2019, a mulled merger of DWS and the asset management arm of UBS fell apart partly because Deutsche was keen to keep control in the asset manager, according to people familiar with the discussions. Would minority shareholders in DWS have preferred a UBS deal or a chief executive with more asset management experience?

DWS has declared itself as a champion of shareholder rights and “transparently communicated succession planning”. It promises to hold “boards and directors accountable” over those issues, calling on them “to demonstrate how they are including relevant stakeholder views in their discussions and decisions”.

If DWS continues to perform poorly, the questions over whether the KGaA structure fits with those aims can only multiply.

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 29th of June 2022

>>> Up
* Autoliv Raised to Neutral at Exane; PT $86
* Continental Raised to Outperform at Exane; PT 91 euros
* ING Raised to Add at AlphaValue/Baader
* Sandvik Raised to Outperform at RBC; PT 240 kronor

>>> Down
* Altria Cut to Underweight at Barclays; PT $36
* Anglo American Cut to Hold at Deutsche Bank
* Carnival PT Cut to $7 from $13 at Morgan Stanley
* Diageo Cut to Sell at Deutsche Bank; PT 3,230 pence
* Nike PT Cut to $125 from $140 at Barclays
* NOS Cut to Underweight at JPMorgan; PT 3.70 euros
* SAS, Unions and Mediators Agree to Extend Mediation Deadline
* Stellantis Cut to Neutral at Exane; PT $16.85
* Swisscom Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 676 Swiss francs
* Telekom Austria Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 7.10 euros
* Telenet Cut to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 27 euros
* Travis Perkins Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 1,200 pence
* Vantage Towers Cut to Underweight at JPMorgan; PT 27 euros
* Vodafone Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 168 pence

>>> Initiation
* Ageas Rated New Overweight at Barclays; PT 59 euros
* Azelis Rated New Hold at Jefferies; PT 22 euros
* Galliford Try Rated New Buy at Panmure Gordon; PT 230 pence
* IMCD Initiated at Buy and Preferred to Azelis at Jefferies

>>> Call
* Diageo Downgraded to Sell at Deutsche Bank on Looming Headwinds
* Just Eat Rated Sell at Berenberg on Muted Trading, Grubhub Sale
* Sandvik Upgraded at RBC on Mining Outlook, Solid Tooling Arm
* Telenet Cut at MS on Slow Capital Allocation Strategy Progress

>>> What to look at today - 29th of June 2022

Stocks dropped Wednesday on renewed worries about economic growth as monetary policy tightens in much of the world to fight inflation.  An Asian equity index snapped a four-day climb, shedding over 1%, European futures dipped and US contracts edged up. A tech-led slide hurt the S&P 500 Tuesday. Institutional portfolio rebalancing may be impacting trading. China’s bourses were in the red too as optimism ebbed over a surprise move from a day earlier to reduced quarantine times for inbound travelers. The step hinted at an eventual shift away from a strategy of stamping out Covid that involves great economic cost via lockdowns and travel curbs. The dollar held gains after rising the most in over a week in the Wall Street session. Treasuries advanced, lowering the 10-year yield at 3.13%. Oil slipped toward $111 a barrel. In cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin continued to hover around the $20,000 level. Investors appear skeptical that the Federal Reserve can avoid a bruising economic downturn amid sharp interest-rate hikes. Evaporating consumer confidence is feeding into concerns that the US might tip into a recession. US officials sought to play down recession risk. New York Fed President John Williams and San Francisco’s Mary Daly both acknowledged they had to cool inflation, but insisted that a soft landing was still possible.  US After Hours PINS +4.2% higher as Google exec will become new CEO; XAIR +20.6% jumps on FDA approval; AVAV -9.1% lower on earnings

Nikkei -1.01% Hang Seng -1.89% CSI -1.05% Shanghai -0.99% Shenzen -1.44%

Eur$ 1.0508 CNH 6.7030 CNY 6.6995 JPY 136.04 GBP 1.2197 RUB 53.6136 TRY 16.6705 WTI$ 110.92 -0.72% Gold 1,821.70 +0.09% BTC 20,085 -0.80% ETH 1,127 -2.88%

S&P +0.18% Nasdaq +0.33% EuroStoxx -0.65% FTSE -0.73% Dax -0.58% SMI -0.54%

Macro :
- Beleaguered British Bankers See $20 Billion of Deals Fall Apart
- Growth on Pace to Beat Value for Second Time This Year
- 60/40 Portfolios on Track for Worst Hit Since 1988
- EU Countries Uphold Phaseout of New Cars Emissions by 2035 (1)

Keep an eye on :
- ASA NO : Atlantic Sapphire Offering of 60m Shares Prices at NOK20.5/Share
- BME LN : B&M European Says Performance is Ahead of Expectations
- CARY SS : CVC Funds, Nordic Capital Offer to Buy Cary Group for SEK65/Shr
- COFB BB : Cofinimmo to Spend EU14m on Prelet Care Home Project in Murcia
- ROO LN : Deliveroo Rolls Out Ads on its Delivery App to Increase Revenue
- De Nora IPO : De Nora Said to See Concentrated Order Book for EU474m Milan IPO
- DBK GY : Deutsche Bank Sold About 3.48 Million Shares of Nexi
- EL FP : Billionaire Del Vecchio Leaves Top Aide to Run His ‘Factory’
- FTK GY : FlatexDegiro Fined EU2m by Dutch Regulator for Reporting Errors
- GOG LN : Go-Ahead Agrees Revised Rail Contract in Norway
- IPN FP : Ipsen Announces U.S. FDA Priority Review for Palovarotene
- Italian Design Brand IPO : Italian Design Brands Aims to Go Public in Milan by 1H 2023
- BAER SW : Julius Baer Names Vignola to Executive Board, Separates Unit
- MSEIS NO : TGS to Buy Magseis Fairfield for NOK8.6048/Share: M&A Snapshot
- NEXI IM : Deutsche Bank Sold About 3.48 Million Shares of Nexi
- SPM IM : Saipem Loses Appeal on LNG Project in Algerian Court
- SANN SW : Santhera Says Finalization of NDA Submission in US Delayed to 4Q
- TEL NO : Malaysia Regulator Doesn’t Object to Celcom-Digi Merger
- TFI FP : TF1 Agrees to Sell Unify Publishers to Reworld Media; No Terms
- TGS NO : TGS to Buy Magseis Fairfield for NOK8.6048/Share: M&A Snapshot

FT : German arms companies fear for their slice of defence windfall

German arms companies fear for their slice of defence windfall
Bosses warn sector’s revival threatened by bureaucracy despite Berlin’s pledge to vastly increase military budget

In a hangar that blends into the German port of Kiel’s industrial wharf, Thyssenkrupp engineers are testing the steel hull of a submarine to ensure it can withstand more than 50 bars of water pressure. But the vessels built in the country’s largest shipyard will not be delivered to Germany’s navy.

Instead, they will go to the likes of Israel and Singapore, which placed orders with the group even as the German government shunned its homegrown manufacturer by awarding a €4.6bn contract for MKS 180 frigates to a Dutch company. The 2020 snubbing of Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems (TKMS), which had been haemorrhaging cash, came to encapsulate the parlous state of Germany’s defence sector.

But Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the German government’s subsequent commitment to vastly increase military spending has suddenly turned TKMS into an asset.

“Now we have a recalibration,” said TKMS’ new chief executive Oliver Burkhard. Since chancellor Olaf Scholz announced he would set aside €100bn to modernise Germany’s armed forces, and committed to spending 2 per cent of annual gross domestic product on defence, TKMS has expanded. Originally set to be sold by parent Thyssnkrupp, it has become a buyer, snapping up the insolvent MV Werften, based in the nearby city of Wismar, whose Asian owner had run out of cash midway through building a giant cruise ship.

Yet behind the scenes, German industry still “fears nothing will happen”, according to a former defence official who now advises the sector.

“There was virtually no domestic market for German arms companies,” the person said, referring to the fact that at least three-quarters of local arms production is exported. “There is no playbook.”


Several German defence companies have been banking on rapid growth as a result of closer collaboration with Scholz’s coalition government.

Within days of the chancellor’s speech in February, Rheinmetall, the country’s largest listed weapons-maker, presented Berlin with a list of products worth €42bn that it could deliver over the next decade.

The majority of its orders for tanks, armoured vehicles and ammunition had previously come from outside Germany, from the likes of the UK and Hungary.

Hensoldt, an Airbus spinout backed by KKR and partly owned by the German government, is also expecting a windfall. “We will be part of every large procurement programme,” said a person close to the company, which specialises in advanced radar and sensor systems.

Concerns that Scholz’s spending plans would not pass through parliament without being watered down were abated when the vast majority of the Bundestag voted them through earlier this month.

So far, however, the large orders made by Berlin following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have consisted of 35 American-made F-35 fighter jets, as well as 60 CH-47F Chinook heavy-lift helicopters from Chicago-based Boeing. Procurement from Germany’s own weapons producers has largely been limited to ammunition and clothing from existing stocks.


Longer-term projects worth more than €25mn currently have to go through a lengthy tender process run by a division of the defence ministry in Koblenz that in some instances has taken several years, and then be approved by two parliamentary committees — by which point additional production capacity could be reserved for other countries, representatives from public and private companies told the Financial Times.

Hensoldt board member Celia Pelaz, a Spaniard, agreed that “we need to look at the acquisition processes of the German government”, which are mired in bureaucracy, warning that otherwise it was “going to be difficult actually to put that money to use”.

Berlin has since pledged to speed things up. In an attempt to entice the government into further accelerating its decision-making, TKMS has said it could secure up to 1,500 jobs in Wismar if it gets picked to build more submarines and battleships.

“I made a formula saying the more you order, the more people we can employ,” Burkhard said of his discussions with Scholz’s administration. “Sometimes they need a bit of pressure just to act.” 

Rheinmetall’s boss has also dangled a carrot in front of policymakers. “In the next 12 to 18 months, we will hire 1,500-3,000 people, depending on what contracts we get,” Armin Papperger said.


But lobbyists for the sector privately concede that it is not significant enough to apply pressure on the government by pledging to create new roles. Germany’s defence companies account for fewer than 57,000 jobs in the country, according to the German Economic Institute in Cologne, while France’s armaments industry directly employs 165,000 people.

“In the past, if the car industry had a headache the chancellor would probably run and hold their hands. If the defence industry struggled, so far not many cared,” said Claudia Major, a security expert at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP.

“Economically speaking, it’s not important.”

There is also public sentiment to contend with. “In Germany, the defence industry is seen as one of those unpleasant, dirty things almost nobody wants to show up with,” Major added. Indeed, Germany’s aversion to the sector almost forced the sale of TKMS, as its parent group was told banks would no longer finance Thyssenkrupp if the unit exceeded 10 per cent of annual revenue, falling foul of lenders’ environmental, social and governance criteria.

Consolidation among Germany’s patchwork of defence contractors — especially when it comes to shipyards — will also be needed to offer value for money to the government, TKMS’ Burkhard said. The choice for his company, he added, is “to be lunch or to have lunch”.

Yet even those with unparalleled technology have found it hard to attract the interest of Berlin. At its manufacturing site in Ulm, Hensoldt builds cutting-edge passive radar systems that can detect enemy objects without emitting a signal. The devices, which when stowed away are roughly the size of an airline drinks trolley, were initially produced for Egypt.

The tech developed at a former army barracks in the heart of Bavaria has not yet been ordered by Germany itself.

The lesson from the invasion of Ukraine is that “we need an industry, we need a technology base”, Hensoldt’s Pelaz said. “We shouldn’t now say: ‘well, because we need it quickly, we don’t care where it comes from’.”

Some new contracts have come through. On Thursday, Rheinmetall was awarded a €13mn contract for air start units from the German Air Force. But with order books at the likes of TKMS already full, the sector is mostly “in a holding pattern”, according to one senior executive, waiting for concrete commitments before making large investments.

Looking out over the Baltic Sea from his office in Kiel, TKMS’ Burkhard sees the potential for a wave of new business. “A commander told us that everything that floats is out at the moment,” he said of the German Navy’s current fleet. The next global conflict could well occur in the South China Sea, making submarines and frigates all the more important.

A test of whether the German government will embrace its own arms industry is coming up. Two more MKS 180 frigates — now called F126s — are on the military’s recently compiled “wish-list”. If those contracts are not awarded to Thyssenkrupp, Burkhard said, “the signal would be not a great one”.