CrunchBase : Robotics Startup Skild AI Lands $1.4B, Tripling Valuation To $14B I

Robotics Startup Skild AI Lands $1.4B, Tripling Valuation To $14B In Just 7 Months

Skild AI, a robotics company building an “omni-bodied” brain to operate any robot for any task, announced Wednesday that it has raised $1.4 billion, tripling its valuation to over $14 billion.

The fundraise comes just over seven months after Skild raised a $135 million Series B at a $4.5 billion valuation.

SoftBank Group led the startup’s latest financing, which included participation from NVentures, Nvidia’s venture capital arm, entities administered by Macquarie Capital, Bezos Expeditions, Disruptive and 1789 Capital. Several strategic investors also wrote checks into the round, including Samsung, LG Technology Ventures, Schneider Electric, CommonSpirit Health, and Salesforce Ventures .

The company says it grew from zero to about $30 million revenue “in just a few months” in 2025, and “is growing exponentially.” It is deploying its technology in a variety of environments, including security and facility inspection, last-mile and point-to-point delivery, warehouses, manufacturing, data centers, and construction tasks, among others.

Looking ahead, Skild AI plans to deploy robotics in consumers homes, with enterprise tasks as the first application.

Last year was a good year for robotic startup funding. Overall, robotics startups raised $13.8 billion in funding in 2025, up from $7.8 billion in 2024 and even topping the $13.1 billion raised in the peak venture funding year of 2021.

Another example of a company building a brain for robots that recently raised capital is Flexion. The Zurich-based startup, which says it’s “building the brain for humanoid and human-capable robots,” raised $50 million in funding in November.

Multipurposing intelligence
Skild AI claims to be building the industry’s “first unified robotics foundation model” called the Skild Brain. The company says its model differs from traditional ones that are tailored to specific robot designs in that it is omni-bodied and “can control any robot without prior knowledge of their exact body form,” including quadrupeds, humanoids, tabletop arms and mobile manipulators.

As such, Skild AI says its technology gives robots the ability to perform simpler tasks such as household chores like cleaning, loading a dishwasher and making an egg, as well as more physically demanding activities such as navigating slippery terrain.

“The Skild Brain can control robots it has never trained on, adapting in real time to extreme changes in form or environments. The model is forced to adapt rather than memorize — much like intelligence in nature,” said Deepak Pathak, CEO and co-founder of Skild AI, in a release.

TechCrunch : OpenAI invests in Sam Altman’s brain computer interface startup Mer

OpenAI invests in Sam Altman’s brain computer interface startup Merge Labs

Just when you thought the circular deals couldn’t get any more circular, OpenAI has invested in CEO Sam Altman’s brain computer interface (BCI) startup Merge Labs.

Merge Labs, which defines itself as a “research lab” dedicated to “bridging biological and artificial intelligence to maximize human ability,” came out of stealth on Thursday with an undisclosed seed round. A source familiar with the matter confirmed previous reports that OpenAI wrote the largest single check in Merge Labs’ $250 million seed round at an $850 million valuation.


“Our individual experience of the world arises from billions of active neurons,” reads a statement from Merge Labs. “If we can interface with these neurons at scale, we could restore lost abilities, support healthier brain states, deepen our connection with each other, and expand what we can imagine and create alongside advanced AI.”

Merge Labs said it intends to reach these feats noninvasively by developing “entirely new technologies that connect with neurons using molecules instead of electrodes” to “transit and receive information using deep-reaching modalities like ultrasound.”

The move deepens Altman’s competition with Elon Musk, whose startup Neuralink is also developing computer interface chips that allow people who suffer from severe paralysis to control devices with their thoughts. Neuralink currently requires invasive surgery for implantation, where a surgical robot removes a small piece of skull and inserts ultra-fine electrode threads into the brain to read neural signals. The company last raised a $650 million Series E at a $9 billion valuation in June 2025.

While there are undoubtedly medical use cases for BCIs, Merge Labs seems more focused on using the technology to fulfill a Silicon Valley fantasy of combining human biology with AI to give us superhuman capabilities.

“Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) are an important new frontier,” OpenAI wrote in a blog post. “They open new ways to communicate, learn, and interact with technology. BCIs will create a natural, human-centered way for anyone to seamlessly interact with AI. This is why OpenAI is participating in Merge Labs’ seed round.”

Aside from Altman, other co-founders include Alex Blania (CEO) and Sandro Herbig (product and engineering lead) at Tools for Humanity, another Altman-backed company (and creator of the eye-scanning World orbs); Tyson Aflalo and Sumner Norman, co-founders of implantable neural tech company Forest Neurotech; and Mikhail Shapiro, a researcher at Caltech.

Blania and Herbig said in separate social media posts that they would continue their roles at Tools for Humanity. Merge Labs did not confirm whether Alfalo and Norman would maintain their positions at Forest Neurotech, only saying that the company would continue operating and will have a “wonderful working relationship” with Merge. Shapiro intends to continue teaching at Caltech.

A spokesperson told TechCrunch that the co-founders are also Merge Labs’ board members.


As part of the deal, OpenAI will work with Merge Labs on scientific foundation models and other frontier tools to “accelerate progress.” In its blog post, OpenAI noted that AI will not only help accelerate R&D in bioengineering, neuroscience, and device engineering, but that the interfaces will also benefit from AI operating systems that “can interpret intent, adapt to individuals, and operate reliably with limited and noisy signals.”

In other words, Merge Labs could function as a remote control for OpenAI’s software. That leads into the circular nature of the deal: If Merge Labs succeeds, it could drive more users to OpenAI, which then justifies OpenAI’s investment into the company. It also increases the value of a startup Altman owns using resources from a company he runs.

OpenAI is also working with Jony Ive’s startup io, which it acquired last year, to produce a piece of AI hardware that doesn’t rely on a screen. Recent unconfirmed leaks suggest the device might be an earbud.

OpenAI primarily invests through the OpenAI Startup Fund, which has invested in several other startups connected to Altman, including Red Queen Bio, Rain AI, and Harvey. OpenAI has also entered into commercial agreements with startups Altman personally owns or chairs, including nuclear fusion startup Helion Energy and nuclear fission company Oklo.

Altman has been dreaming about the “merge” — the idea that humans and machines will merge — since at least 2017 when he published a blog post guessing it would happen somewhere between 2025 and 2075. He also speculated that the merge could take many forms, including plugging electrons into our brains or becoming “really close friends with a chatbot.”

He said a merge is our “best-case scenario” for humanity surviving against superintelligence AI, which he describes as a separate species that’s in conflict with humans.

“Although the merge has already begun, it’s going to get a lot weirder,” Altman wrote. “We will be the first species ever to design our own descendants. My guess is that we can either be the biological bootloader for digital intelligence and then fade into an evolutionary tree branch, or we can figure out what a successful merge looks like.”

TechCrunch has reached out to OpenAI and Merge Labs for more information.

>>> BlackRock Partnership Raises $12.5 Billion for Data Center Bets

BlackRock Partnership Raises $12.5 Billion for Data Center Bets

BlackRock raised $12.5 billion for the AI investment partnership it formed in 2024 with Microsoft and United Arab Emirates-backed MGX, giving it more firepower to invest in data centers and energy resources.

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, said Thursday it raised the money from the founders of the partnership, Global AI Infrastructure Investment Partnership, and outside investors. The partnership is aiming to invest $30 billion in equity and as much as $100 billion when including debt.

The partnership last year invested in a $40 billion consortium deal to acquire Aligned Data Centers that’s expected to close in the first half of this year. MGX, which made an additional investment as part of the consortium, will be Aligned’s largest shareholder following the sale, The Information reported.

The Information : Cowork Versus Copilot

Cowork Versus Copilot

The AI business continues to create and shift alliances between almost every leading tech firm. Companies may be incentivized to work together to fill each other’s AI or capital needs even as they compete more fiercely for consumer or enterprise dollars.

That’s what’s happening with Microsoft and Anthropic. The two firms have recently become fast friends, with Microsoft on track to spend more than $500 million annually on Anthropic models to power its AI software, Copilot, as we reported Wednesday.

Now, Microsoft is racing to sell Copilot to the same businesses Anthropic is targeting with its own products.

Anthropic this week released Cowork, which aims to automate white-collar tasks—basically anything someone would do on their computer for work. For instance, you can point Cowork to a file full of screenshots of receipts and direct it to create a spreadsheet listing the expenses shown in the photos, Anthropic says. In another example Anthropic shared, Cowork parses transcripts of a manager’s meetings from the past week, generating a summary of the most important tasks they need to complete and creating a slide deck recapping their team’s goals and objectives, which the manager can share with staff.

Cowork can execute tasks involving any applications a person uses, and it can work in the background, letting the person do other things while the AI does its thing.

After years in which every major tech and AI firm—Microsoft and Anthropic included—have touted such possibilities thanks to generative AI, will Cowork finally do the trick? We don’t know yet, but it can’t be lost on Microsoft that the name Cowork shares a couple of key letters with the name of Microsoft’s AI brand. And CEO Satya Nadella previously referred to Copilot’s ambition to be a “digital coworker.”

Part of the reason for the hype around Cowork is it’s a direct offshoot of Anthropic’s wildly popular coding tool, Claude Code, which has captured the AI attention economy much the way ChatGPT did three years ago. (To understand why, see this piece.)

Microsoft’s next challenge will be to harness Anthropic’s technology to differentiate Copilot from Cowork.

The situation heralds back to Microsoft’s prior history with OpenAI. Around the time that Microsoft invested $10 billion in OpenAI three years ago, executives thought adding the startup’s models to Bing to create a chatbot-like experience would finally give Microsoft’s search engine an edge over Google; instead, ChatGPT, released just weeks before the new Bing, stole Bing’s thunder.

And lately, Microsoft’s Office business has faced growing competition from ChatGPT, even as Nadella races to use OpenAI models to boost Copilot features in Office apps, such as making calculations in Excel or generating Powerpoint decks based on written prompts.

At the end of the day, Microsoft has many ways to win in AI—it’s still generating billions of dollars in new revenue a year from its OpenAI partnership, primarily from the startup renting Microsoft cloud servers to run its AI.

Anthropic, similarly, agreed last year to spend billions of dollars renting Microsoft servers.

The advent of Cowork means chief information and technology officers will have yet another option to choose from in the growing menu of workplace AI products. Many of those tools, offered by just about every enterprise software firm on the market, are promising to automate the same kind of work.

Unlike those traditional enterprise firms, Anthropic can boast that it created the underlying AI models powering the automation and therefore can handle more cutting-edge tasks. On the other hand, Microsoft has existing contracts with most of the largest companies in the world, and it usually harps on security as a core concern customers should have if they work directly with young startups. (See Tuesday’s column for more on lingering security concerns involving products such as Claude Code.)

So Microsoft could still have a leg up in this race. By working closely with Microsoft, Anthropic is hedging bets.

FT : Donald Trump calls for emergency energy auction to make tech giants pay for

Donald Trump calls for emergency energy auction to make tech giants pay for AI power
President urges nation’s largest grid operator to have data centre companies bid for contracts to build power plants

Donald Trump and a number of state governors are pushing the US’s largest electrical grid operator to hold an emergency auction to make tech giants foot the bill for AI power infrastructure.

The administration along with governors of states including Pennsylvania, Ohio and Virginia have urged PJM — which serves more than 67mn people in the US north-east and Midwest — to hold a power auction in which big data centre operators bid for 15-year contracts to build new power plants.

Such contracts could support the construction of about $15bn worth of new power plants, with tech companies paying for them regardless of whether they use the resulting electricity, a White House official confirmed.

PJM did not respond to a request for comment. It is unclear if the grid operator will meet politicians’ demand to hold an emergency auction.

The US president is seeking to address a backlash over rising utility bills as part of his wider effort to promote affordability. The increase in power costs has been driven in part by massive demand from data centres, which the administration and tech companies view as aiding economic growth and vital to the US in its race against its AI rivals.

Residential electricity costs have risen by 13 per cent since January 2025, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration.

According to BloombergNEF, US data centre energy demand will surge from 34.7 gigawatts in 2024 to 106GW by 2035. The flood of demand will require massive investment in power plants and transmission lines, which affordability advocates fear will drive up customer bills.

Concerns about affordability have already resonated in political races across the country. Democratic governors-elect Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey and Abigail Spanberger of Virginia won their races in November after promising to keep utility rates down.

On Monday Trump took to Truth Social to demand tech companies “pay their way”, after which Microsoft pledged to pay higher electricity rates in areas it builds data centres to cover the cost of new infrastructure.

PJM, the grid operator for “data centre alley” in Virginia — which handles 70 per cent of the world’s search traffic — has come under fire for its failure to prevent runaway costs.

PJM sets costs through an auction where plants submit the minimum price they need to provide power for the year ahead. It then starts by picking the lowest bidders, but the price is set by the final, most expensive bid. Those costs are then passed on to utilities and customers. As demand for power increases, the bids of more expensive plants are accepted.

The emergency proposal would take the unusual step of making tech companies pay for the costs of the power sold from the auction.

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro — a participant in the announcement — has led efforts to keep costs down, introducing a price cap in early 2025. The two subsequent auctions in July and December hit the cap.

PJM can hold extra auctions should regularly timed ones fail to procure enough capacity, as was the case in December.

FT : SpaceX partner EchoStar struggles to reach escape velocity

SpaceX partner EchoStar struggles to reach escape velocity
Charlie Ergen’s future will probably be guided by what happens to Elon Musk’s company

Wealth and kindness do not grow in tandem. The relationship may even be inversely proportional. Consider Charlie Ergen, the US billionaire and former professional poker player who runs telecoms company EchoStar. Despite being much enriched via a stake in Elon Musk’s SpaceX — an investment that could launch his company on a new trajectory — Ergen seems more sharp-elbowed than ever.

EchoStar sold off more than $40bn of telecoms spectrum last year at the behest of the Trump administration, which felt Ergen had been too slow in building a national mobile network. The buyers in the deal, which has yet to close, included AT&T and SpaceX, which paid in its own private stock.

That wasn’t enough to give EchoStar a clean break. It retained contracts with suppliers and cell tower companies, some of which are now coming unstuck. Crown Castle this week cancelled a lease with an EchoStar subsidiary, Dish Wireless, saying Dish had defaulted on its cell tower rent, and owed $3.5bn. That is a significant amount for Crown Castle, equivalent to about a tenth of its market capitalisation.

Nor is it the only one feeling bruised by Ergen’s hasty exit from mobile telecoms. Another infrastructure vendor, American Tower, sued in federal court over halted lease payments, a figure analysts at MoffettNathanson say exceeds $3bn.

On one hand, Ergen seems to think there’s a middle ground to be struck. In November, he suggested “lawyers talking to lawyers” was less productive than “business people talking to business people”. On the other, EchoStar argues, somewhat boldly, that because it was forced by the government to sell its spectrum, “force majeure” allows it to shed its obligations. Declaring bankruptcy through a subsidiary is one possible avenue to terminate the tower leases but hold on to the cash.


It’s not obvious Ergen would need to quibble about such sums, though. SpaceX was valued at $400bn when the assets-for-stock swap with EchoStar was announced. Now, Musk’s rocket company is targeting an $800bn valuation or more. EchoStar’s own market capitalisation has quadrupled since August, to $38bn, and Ergen’s personal stake is valued at more than $9bn.

EchoStar has other loose ends to tie up, including spectrum yet to be sold, and its satellite business Dish Network. But Ergen’s future will probably be guided by what happens to SpaceX. EchoStar might even become a vessel through which Musk’s company could smoothly go public. Wherever he ends up, future counterparties should note from these latest bare-knuckle dealings that the new Charlie Ergen is very much like the old one.

FT : Lebanon’s bonds rally on bets that Iran’s influence could be weakened

Lebanon’s bonds rally on bets that Iran’s influence could be weakened
Defaulted debt jumps more than 25% as investors hope protests will reduce support for groups such as Hizbollah

Lebanon’s defaulted dollar bonds have surged in price more than 25 per cent so far this year over bets that recent nationwide protests in Iran could reduce the Islamic republic’s influence in the region.

Lebanese debts with a face value of $30bn have risen from 23 to 29 cents on the dollar this month — the highest level since its 2020 default amid an economic crisis — on optimism that Beirut is now fixing its finances and that Iran-backed groups across the region, such as Hizbollah in Lebanon, will be weakened.

International investors have been hunting for defaulted sovereign debt trading at knockdown prices, which they hope could surge in value just as Venezuela’s bonds did this month following the US capture of President Nicolás Maduro.

“Lebanon is probably trading well because of the Iranian situation . . . Money dries up for Hizbollah” if the regime is weakened further, said one fund manager who is a specialist in distressed sovereign bonds and who is monitoring the situation.

Human rights groups outside Iran estimate that thousands have been killed in the protests — the biggest anti-regime unrest since the 1979 Islamic revolution — which appeared to have subsided in the face of a fierce state crackdown.

Lebanon’s bonds had already been rallying over signs of the waning political influence of militant group Hizbollah, which has previously opposed an IMF-led debt restructuring. The group has long been one of the country’s most powerful military and political forces but has suffered a series of severe blows over the past 18 months. For instance, the bonds tripled in price from 6 cents on the dollar after Israel’s September 2024 assassination of Hizbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.

The US’s dramatic capture of Maduro this month has driven a sharp rally in the South American country’s bonds over hopes of a restructuring, and investors are now fearful of missing out on similar rallies in other bonds previously seen as near-worthless.

“The unexpected 30 per cent rally in Venezuela [bonds] has shown [institutional investors] that being underweight can be dangerous,” said a hedge fund manager.

“They are busy reducing those underweights [against the index] in many esoteric names, Lebanon being the most obvious,” the manager added.


While Lebanon remains a long way from securing an IMF-backed debt restructuring, the bonds have also rallied due to progress being made on a so-called gap law to sort out tens of billions of dollars of losses on deposits from a 2019 financial crisis and banking sector collapse. While at an early stage and still needing to be passed by parliament, the proposals have given bondholders more clarity on how much might be left over for them after depositors are paid.

Recent cabinet approval of a draft law “is the most tangible element of the rally but it’s hard to distinguish it fully from concurrent developments in Iran”, said Roger Mark, an emerging markets fixed-income analyst at Ninety One.

“A weaker Hizbollah in theory should make political decision-making easier and reduce Iranian influence on Lebanese [government] decision-making,” he added.

Analysts have previously estimated that bondholders would recover only about 25 cents on the dollar in any Lebanese debt restructuring given the costs of sorting out the banking system. But investors have been encouraged by the boost to Lebanon’s reserves from the surge in the price of gold over the past year and an improving economic outlook.

Hedge fund managers stress that bets on Iran through Lebanese government bonds are highly uncertain, citing the difficulty of dislodging the regime and pointing out that while proxies across the region could be weakened, they are likely to remain in place.

“As we’ve seen with Venezuela, sanctions being lifted is usually slow because the US wants to see policy they like enforced first,” said the hedge fund manager.

The protests in Iran, and the possibility of changes to the regime, have also prompted international investors to look at whether they might at some point be able to re-enter the country’s domestic stock market, where sanctions have kept almost all foreigners away in recent years.

Maciej Wojtal, chief investment officer of Amtelon Capital, an Amsterdam-based manager that holds a rare foreign institutional investor licence to trade Iranian stocks, said he is fielding a surge in calls from investors based in Europe and elsewhere.

“The last few days, I’ve been 15 hours a day just communicating with investors . . . this shows there is a lot of people waiting for some sort of catalyst, just to be ready to invest as quickly as they can,” Wojtal said. Amtelon cannot engage with US investors due to Washington’s sanctions.

Despite rising sharply in nominal terms, Iran’s Tedpix benchmark index stands at less than one-third of its all-time high reached in 2020, when measured in dollars using the unofficial so-called “bazaar” exchange rate, which is much weaker than the rial’s official value.

Steps towards the normalisation of Iran’s economy and the removal of sanctions would boost the market by opening up exports and access to foreign currency to relieve the rial’s plunge, Wojtal said.

“Sanctions impact the whole macroeconomic structure, including exports, which impacts hard currency reserves. The more hard currency reserves come in, the stronger the local currency,” he said.

FT : Goldman and Morgan Stanley investment bankers ride dealmaking wave

Goldman and Morgan Stanley investment bankers ride dealmaking wave
Chief David Solomon says Goldman had largest backlog of deals since pandemic

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley reported bumper earnings for the final quarter of 2025, capping Wall Street’s best year for investment banking in four years.

Four of the five big US investment banks this week reported an increase in quarterly fees from advisory work, adding to bankers’ optimism that the Trump administration’s deregulatory agenda will deliver a boom for the industry.

Goldman chief executive David Solomon said the bank had its largest backlog of deals since the pandemic, as companies seek to capitalise on looser US regulations.

“I think CEOs and boards are looking and saying, OK, we’ve got a window here of a handful of years where the opportunity to consider big, strategic, transformative things is certainly possible.”

Results from Goldman and Morgan Stanley on Thursday underlined how renewed appetite for dealmaking and rising stock markets have buoyed their core Wall Street businesses.

Goldman reported net income of $4.6bn for the quarter, a 12 per cent increase from a year earlier, while at Morgan Stanley, profits rose 18 per cent to $4.4bn.

Shares in both Goldman and Morgan Stanley hit record highs, with Morgan Stanley up about 5.7 per cent and Goldman up 4 per cent on Thursday afternoon.

Investment banking and equities trading were the twin drivers of the banks’ earnings, with a 45 per cent increase in fees from dealmaking at Morgan Stanley helping it leapfrog rival JPMorgan Chase in financial advisory revenues.

Morgan Stanley chief executive Ted Pick said corporate America was coming out of a “stuck boardroom mentality” with executives more willing to borrow and make big acquisitions as interest rates ease. “Now there is really no more time to waste,” Pick said.


However, Morgan Stanley’s Pick couched his optimism with a warning that the “macro backdrop is complicated” and said that now “is not the time to over-reach”, as he left the bank’s medium-term financial targets unchanged.

JPMorgan, which reported earnings on Tuesday, was alone among the top five Wall Street banks in posting a decline in fees from investment banking in the final quarter of 2025, with a 5 per cent decrease year on year.

Bank of America eked out a 0.7 per cent gain, while Citigroup’s turnaround showed progress with a 35 per cent increase in investment banking fees.

Equities traders across the five banks posted a record $60bn in revenues for 2025, as stock markets performed strongly and some investors repositioned away from the US.

Bank’s trading businesses, which were unloved for years after the 2008 financial crisis, became a useful crutch when revenues from dealmaking collapsed in 2022.


In 2025, both businesses flourished in parallel. Goldman posted $4.3bn of revenues from equity trading in the final quarter of the year — a record for any bank — surpassing Morgan Stanley’s $3.7bn.

In asset management, into which the banks have expanded to provide ballast to their more volatile investment banking and trading businesses, Morgan Stanley’s client assets exceeded $9tn for the first time in the fourth quarter. 


This brought the Wall Street bank closer to its target to oversee $10tn at its wealth and asset management businesses. The bulk of these funds is in wealth management. 

Goldman set new “medium-term” targets for its asset and wealth management business, including a goal of reaching $750bn in alternative assets under supervision by 2030.

Asset management giant BlackRock reported its biggest ever quarterly inflows, pushing assets under management above $14tn for the first time.

WSJ : Philly Fed’s Paulson Says Rate Cuts Can Wait, Shows Support for Powell

Philly Fed’s Paulson Says Rate Cuts Can Wait, Shows Support for Powell
Anna Paulson says central bank chair has been ‘very effective,’ endorses prevailing view that another rate cut isn’t needed right now

  • Philadelphia Fed President Anna Paulson supports holding interest rates steady at the coming meeting.
  • Paulson is open to cutting rates modestly later in the year if inflation data confirms easing price pressures or if the job market unexpectedly deteriorates.

PHILADELPHIA—Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has become an unlikely folk hero, the subject of internet memes celebrating his stewardship of the central bank. Philadelphia Fed President Anna Paulson knows this because her 20-year-old son sends them to her.

“So many people have been impressed by his leadership, myself included,” Paulson said in an interview Wednesday, her first with a national outlet since taking the job last July.

Powell disclosed on Sunday that he is facing a criminal investigation related to the renovation of the Fed’s Washington headquarters—a probe Powell said was really about monetary policy and the desire by President Trump for lower interest rates.

“His statement was really strong. I think it really speaks for itself,” said Paulson. Powell “has been a very effective chair,” as were his predecessors, she said. “We’ve had really strong leadership at the Federal Reserve for many decades, and I think that’s been to the benefit of the American people.”

The Fed bank president has attended meetings of the rate-setting committee since 2019 because she previously served as research director at the Chicago Fed. From that vantage point, she has found it “really impressive how he enables a broad open conversation,” she said. “You want to set up conditions where people are able to take the actions that are good for the institution and good for the economy…Part of the job as chair is to navigate that.”

Paulson echoed several of her colleagues who have also vouched for Powell’s integrity and leadership this week. Those colleagues were divided at the end of last year over how to set rates, with Powell facing growing opposition to the rate cuts that he led his colleagues to make.

For now, Paulson suggested that she shares the prevailing view that there is no hurry to cut rates again. Paulson will become a voter on interest rates this year and supported the Fed’s move to cut its short-term benchmark rate at its last three meetings, most recently in December to a range between 3.5% and 3.75%.

he said she expected inflation would make meaningful progress declining to the central bank’s 2% goal by year’s end, but she was comfortable holding interest rates steady at the Fed’s coming meeting, Jan. 27-28. She thinks rates are still high enough that they are slightly above a neutral level that neither spurs nor slows growth, and she said that was appropriate for the time being to help finish the job bringing inflation down.

“I want monetary policy restrictiveness to be playing a role to get us all the way back to 2%,” she said.

But Paulson said she could favor cutting rates modestly later this year, either after inflation data validate her expectation that price pressures are easing or if evidence emerges that job-market conditions are deteriorating unexpectedly.

She said she would be particularly focused on January price data, which will be released next month, because businesses often reset prices at the beginning of the year. In other words, if businesses are preparing larger price hikes, it should show up soon.

If her baseline outlook for steady growth, declining inflation and a stable labor market is right, “well, then we should be at neutral,” an interest-rate setting she thinks is “a little lower than we are now.”

Paulson’s current views put her on the dovish side of the rate-setting committee because she sees risks to the job market as “a little bit higher” than the risk of stubborn inflation.

Last year, some 95% of private-sector job growth occurred in just one sector—healthcare and social assistance. “If you think about an economy that feels solid and healthy, it seems like it would be generating jobs not just in one sector,” Paulson said.

Research suggests that during periods like the current one, where the job market is slowing but economic output, as measured by gross domestic product, is expanding solidly, “it’s the labor market signal that ends up winning.” But past performance is no guarantee of future outcomes, she said. For example, if the economy is “on the precipice of a productivity boom,” then the economic activity could run strong with less demand for labor.

Paulson said the biggest economic surprise of 2025 for her was the extent to which the labor market cooled, “but that process didn’t accelerate. That’s really unusual.” She added, “The labor market could break quickly…So any sign of breaking versus bending is going to be something that I pay sharp attention to.”

Paulson said it was critically important that the Fed ensures inflation returns to its 2% target. She is less concerned about the inflation outlook than some of her colleagues, however, because she sees evidence that goods price increases last year will reverse this year.

Business executives and owners report that they are more concerned about preserving market share than they have been in years, which makes them more reluctant to raise prices and lose customers. “It’s not like demand conditions are so strong that it’s easy to raise prices. Firms are being very careful, very thoughtful,” Paulson said.