WSJ : Israeli Startups Struggle to Raise Money Amid Political Turmoil, Global Do

Israeli Startups Struggle to Raise Money Amid Political Turmoil, Global Downturn
Tech hub saw 70% drop in funding in the first quarter and underperformed worldwide average

TEL AVIV—Israeli technology companies are struggling to raise funds, recent data shows, amid a combination of global economic trends and investor concerns over how a proposal to overhaul the country’s judiciary could affect the sector, one of the world’s most vibrant hubs for startups.

Israeli technology companies were hurt harder in the first quarter than other global tech hubs, data shows, suggesting the reasons behind the decline in fundraising go beyond macroeconomic conditions.

The global technology sector has suffered as investors pull back due to higher interest rates, a trend Israeli venture capitalists and technology companies say they are also feeling. Some are also saying investor confidence has been hit by the political turmoil sparked by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to overhaul the country’s judicial system. The proposal—which aims to weaken the top court and give more power to lawmakers—has sharply divided the country and driven hundreds of thousands of Israelis to protest the initiative for months.

“It is a double catastrophe, a perfect storm,” said Shlomi Uziel, the co-founder of Quai.MD, an early-stage health-tech company. Mr. Uziel said he recently took a funding deal that slashed his company’s valuation. “I’m considered lucky because I actually had an offer.”

In the first quarter of 2023, Israeli technology companies raised $1.7 billion, a 70% drop from the first quarter of 2022 and the lowest quarterly fundraising level in four years, according to a report released in April by the Tel Aviv-based IVC Research Center.

Globally, funds raised by technology startups decreased 13% in the first quarter of 2023 from the previous quarter, according to the analytics firm CB Insights. In Europe, fundraising fell by 12% in the same period and in the U.S. it declined by 1%, CB Insights found. In Israel, funds raised over the same period decreased by 20%, according to the IVC Research Center.

Israel’s tech sector is one of the world’s largest technology hubs, especially for startups. Companies in Tel Aviv, the center of Israel’s tech industry, raised $6.9 billion from venture-capital firms in 2022, the third-highest of any European, African or Middle Eastern tech hub, according to Dealroom, a tech-analytics company. London, followed by Paris, topped the list.

A dent to the tech industry in Israel—nicknamed Startup Nation—would also have an outsize effect on the country’s economy. The sector makes up around 16% of Israel’s gross domestic product and around half of its exports.

“We are today in the middle of a global crisis, and it is still too early to know when and how it will end. Added to this is a local crisis that has created additional uncertainty,” said Dror Bin, head of the Israeli Innovation Authority, a government body tasked with growing Israel’s technology sector.

Mr. Bin’s comments came in a paper released by the authority on Monday that warned Israel’s tech sector is endangered by a severe decline in funding, a growing negative gap between returns for Israel’s technological stock index in Tel Aviv and the Nasdaq, and an increase in Israeli-led companies being established abroad.

“Even if the legal-judicial crisis is solved, it will take time to reach a solution, and even after this, it will take time to build confidence with investors once more,” Mr. Bin said.

Analysts, entrepreneurs and venture capitalists said the majority of the decrease in fundraising likely stems from the challenging macroeconomic environment. While it is difficult to determine the impact of the political situation, some entrepreneurs say investors explicitly cited the upheaval as a reason for pausing or decreasing the size of investments.

Many in the industry said the second and third quarters will provide a clearer picture because deals reported in the first quarter may have been in the works before the judicial overhaul was announced.

The sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March could also hurt future fundraising for Israeli technology companies.

The bank was one of the most prolific lenders in Israel’s tech industry, and its absence will create even rougher conditions for companies by forcing them back into the challenging equity market, said Adam Fischer, a partner at venture-capital firm Bessemer Venture Partners.

Ilan Samish, the chief executive officer and founder of Amai Proteins, a food-tech startup that produces an artificial protein sweetener, said his recent fundraising efforts had been hit by multiple factors.

He said his company was in the final stages of closing a $100 million funding round in December when the lead investor pulled out due to global economic uncertainties.

At the end of January, Mr. Samish said he brought an investor to Israel who had little knowledge of the country, but was interested in his company. But at the time, Israel was engrossed in internal upheaval caused by opposition to the overhaul.

“Things are turbulent, so I’m closing my pocket until things settle down,” Mr. Samish said he heard from the investor.

Israel’s technology sector has become a prominent actor in the movement against the judicial overhaul that has produced some of the largest protests in the country’s history. The heads of many tech companies have said Israel’s internal instability has become a common topic in conversations with investors.

Mr. Netanyahu has paused the judicial legislation to give time for negotiations with the opposition. Meanwhile, demonstrations against the overhaul have continued, drawing over 100,000 weekly protesters in Tel Aviv.

In April, Moody’s Investors Service joined prominent economists in the U.S. and Israel, including from the country’s central bank, in warning that the government’s proposed judicial overhaul could harm the country’s economic outlook. The agency reaffirmed Israel’s A1 rating, but revised its outlook from positive to stable, a sign it could downgrade the country’s rating in the future.

Some Israeli tech executives say the country’s politics haven’t affected their business.

Didier Toubia, CEO of Aleph Farms, a leading food-tech company in Israel, said that current challenges boiled down to the global macroeconomic environment.

“There might be some perception of Israel-specific risk by some investors. But it is a misperception. The polarization we see in Israel isn’t different from what we see in the U.S. or in France,” said Mr. Toubia, who is originally from France.

Start-Up Nation Central, a Tel Aviv-based nonprofit that tracks tech investments, released a survey in April that found that 84% of investors believe the judicial changes will have a negative effect on their ability to raise capital from abroad.

Israel’s tech industry has shown resilience in the past, including weathering the hit of the dot-com bust at the turn of the millennium, which coincided with a yearslong bloody battle with Palestinians known as the Second Intifada.

Avi Hasson, head of Start-up Nation Central, said the current crisis, which he also called a “perfect storm,” poses a risk to the long-term health of the technology ecosystem because companies are starting to move capital, intellectual property, and talented employees outside of Israel.

The Start-up Nation Central survey found that 78% of investors want their portfolio companies based outside of Israel. It found that 27% of companies are considering relocation packages to move employees outside of Israel, and 35% of those are actively planning to do so.

“The most important ingredient to Start-up Nation is talent. We need to protect it at all costs,” he said.

Erel Margalit, founder and executive chairman of one of Israel’s largest venture-capital firms, Jerusalem Venture Partners, said Israel’s political turmoil is a challenge for the technology sector, but the move to incorporate or move employees abroad will make the firms more global.

“When it comes out of the political crisis, it will be even stronger, and it will be more international,” he said.

FT : S&P criticised by pension funds over dual-class shares decision

S&P criticised by pension funds over dual-class shares decision
Move to reopen S&P 500 and other indices to companies with multiple share class structures draws backlash

Large pension funds are demanding answers from S&P Global about its decision to allow companies with unequal shareholder voting rights into its popular indices, a move that allows private equity giants Blackstone and Ares to join the S&P 500.

The Council of Institutional Investors, which represents pension funds and has advocated against unequal voting rights, said it “was surprised and disappointed” by S&P’s decision on April 17 to reopen the S&P 500 and other indices to companies with multiple share class structures, according to an April 25 letter to S&P seen by the Financial Times.

“We were also disappointed by the opaque process S&P Dow Jones used to reach its decision,” CII said, asking for a meeting with company officials.

S&P’s change reverses a five-year-old policy of barring new companies with dual-class shares from indices. S&P initially banned dual-class companies in 2017 after Snap, the owner of the Snapchat app, went public with no voting rights, sparking an uproar from pension funds. S&P’s prohibition did not force out existing constituents such as Alphabet, Berkshire Hathaway and Meta.

For decades, institutional investors and companies have warred over dual-class shares. This set-up was typically used by family-controlled companies such as Ford and the New York Times to preserve family control over the businesses by selling stock with significantly less voting power.

In recent years, more initial public offerings have increasingly included dual-class shares, especially since Google’s controversial dual-class float in 2004. Pension funds and other big investors have attacked dual-class shares for undercutting their sway over boards. There are at present 27 dual-class share companies in the S&P 500, according to ISS Corporate Solutions. More than 100 companies are now eligible for S&P 500, the mid-cap 400 and small-cap 600, according to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, an investment bank.

Investors said they were caught off guard by the S&P’s decision.

“We were deeply dismayed to hear of S&P’s retrograde decision” on multiple class shares, said Caroline Escott, senior investment manager at Railpen, which manages £35bn for British railway workers.

“It is currently unclear the extent to which the wider investment industry was appropriately consulted during the decision-making process over the last few months,” she said. “We are writing to S&P to ask for further information.”

S&P said the company occasionally reviews its index methodologies and the change on multiple class shares was a result of a public consultation last year with market participants.

Changes in markets and investor sentiment since 2017 meant that restricting multi-class companies “no longer served the index family’s objective”.

“Companies with multiple share classes are part of the total investable universe and should be eligible for potential addition,” it said.

S&P’s rule change means Ares and Blackstone could soon join the benchmark S&P 500 index, KBW said in an April 19 report. Blackstone was probably already eligible, KBW said, but S&P’s rule change “removes any uncertainty” about the private equity group’s eligibility.

“We have the largest market capitalisation of any company in the US not in the S&P 500,” Blackstone president Jon Gray said in an interview with the FT last week.

Jill Fisch, a corporate governance scholar at the University of Pennsylvania law school who has published research about dual-class share companies, said S&P’s prohibition on dual-class shares in 2017 did not deter companies from going public with the structure in recent years.

And there is an argument that small investors missed out on performance opportunities when dual-class share companies were banned by S&P. Companies such as Peloton and Uber were reined in by the market even though they had dual-class shares that protected founders, she said.

Ultimately, the ebb and flow of the stock market was likely to determine how many companies will try to go public with unequal voting rights, she said.

“In a tougher market for IPOs or a tougher equities market overall I think we can expect to see fewer dual-class IPOs,” she said.

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls

  • Upgrades:
    • Alignment Healthcare (ALHC) upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Raymond James; tgt $9
    • Allbirds (BIRD) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Telsey Advisory Group; tgt $1.50
    • AvalonBay (AVB) upgraded to Neutral from Underweight at Piper Sandler; tgt raised to $193
    • Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) upgraded to Buy from Hold at HSBC Securities
    • Biogen (BIIB) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Guggenheim; tgt raised to $350
    • Carter Bank & Trust (CARE) upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Raymond James; tgt $17
    • Comcast (CMCSA) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt raised to $49
    • General Motors (GM) upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt raised to $38
    • IAMGOLD (IAG) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at BMO Capital Markets; tgt raised to $3.25
    • Logitech Int'l SA (LOGI) upgraded to Equal-Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt raised to $56
    • Manitowoc (MTW) upgraded to Equal Weight from Underweight at Wells Fargo; tgt raised to $17
    • Otis Worldwide (OTIS) upgraded to Equal Weight from Underweight at Wells Fargo; tgt raised to $88
    • Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Stifel; tgt raised to $80
    • Teradata (TDC) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Guggenheim; tgt $62
    • Zillow (ZG) upgraded to Mkt Perform from Underperform at Bernstein; tgt raised to $45
  • Downgrades:
    • ArcBest (ARCB) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $91
    • Banco Santander (SAN) downgraded to Hold from Buy at HSBC Securities
    • Doximity (DCOS) downgraded to Equal Weight from Overweight at Wells Fargo; tgt lowered to $37
    • Exxon Mobil (XOM) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt $125
    • IVERIC bio (ISEE) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Guggenheim
    • Principal Fincl (PFG) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $78
    • South Atlantic Bancshares (SABK) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Janney; tgt lowered to $14
    • Valley National (VLY) downgraded to Mkt Perform from Strong Buy at Raymond James
  • Others:
    • Danaher (DHR) initiated with an Outperform at SVB Securities; tgt $300
    • Edgewise Therapeutics (EWTX) initiated with a Buy at Truist
    • Endeavor Group (EDR) initiated with a Buy at Guggenheim; tgt $33
    • Immunovant Sciences (IMVT) initiated with a Buy at BofA Securities; tgt $26
    • MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) initiated with a Buy at Guggenheim; tgt $51
    • TD Synnex (SNX) initiated with a Buy at Goldman; tgt $101
    • Treace Medical Concepts (TMCI) initiated with a Buy at Truist; tgt $33

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • CHKP -4.2%

Other news:

  • FRC -45.9% (JPMorgan Chase (JPM) acquires substantial majority of assets and assumes certain liabilities of First Republic Bank)
  • PLRX -15% (announces positive long-term data from the INTEGRIS-IPF Phase 2a Trial Demonstrating Bexotegrast was well tolerated at 320 mg with durable improvement shown in FVC and across multiple measures)
  • MANU -5.3% (Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani submitted final GBP 5 bln bid for Manchester United)
  • ALPN -3.2% (files for $400 mln mixed securities shelf offering)
  • VIRT -2% (has been responding to requests for information from SEC re its information access barriers; may receive a Wells Notice if no settlement reached)
  • FGEN -2% (announced a non-dilutive term loan facility with investment)
  • NE -1.4% (announces changes to its share capital)

Analyst comments:

  • ARCB -1.7% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities)
  • PFG -0.5% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • SOFI +6.4%, PK +4.1%, EHTH +2.7% (guidance), KBR +2.7%, L +2.2%, NCLH +2.2%

Other news:

  • ISEE +18% (to be acquired by Astellas for $40 per share in cash)
  • ASND +17.4% (FDA issues complete response letter for TransCon PTH in hypoparathyroidism)
  • JSPR +3.8% (files $250 mln mixed shelf securities offering)
  • JPM +3.5% (JPMorgan Chase (JPM) acquires substantial majority of assets and assumes certain liabilities of First Republic Bank)
  • LI +3.4% (April deliveries)
  • ARQT +3.3% (Announces Canadian Approval of ZORYVE)
  • MLCO +2.6% (Macau gaming revs)
  • WYNN +2.4% (Macau gaming revs)
  • LVS +2.1% (Macau gaming revs)
  • IMTX +2.1% (announced that Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) has exercised its option and entered into an exclusive worldwide license for the first T cell receptor engineered T cell therapy candidate from their ongoing collaboration)
  • NIO +0.9% (April deliveries)
  • XPEV +0.9% (April deliveries)

Analyst comments:

  • ALHC +4.8% (upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Raymond James)
  • BIRD +4% (upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Telsey Advisory Group)
  • ZG +1.8% (upgraded to Mkt Perform from Underperform at Bernstein)
  • CMCSA +1.1% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at BofA Securities)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

  • Gapping up:
    • ISEE +17.8%, EHTH +11.7%, GATO +10.6%, JPM +3.1%, ARQT +3%, LI +3%, SNY +3%, MLCO +2.6%, L +2.2%, RCMT +2%, XPEV +1.1%, LVS +1.1%, KBR +1%, WYNN +0.6%, PH +0.5%, NIO +0.5%
  • Gapping down:
    • FRC -45.9%, MANU -9.3%, ALPN -3.2%, VIRT -2.7%, NE -2.1%, HEAR -2%, PLRX -1.8%, FE -1.2%, PK -0.9%

WWD : Tiffany’s Landmark Opening Brings Glitz and BTS to New York

Tiffany’s Landmark Opening Brings Glitz and BTS to New York
LVMH continued its Tiffany spending spree with a blowout celebration to mark The Landmark's opening — drawing celebrities, collectors, business titans and others from across the globe.

If there were any remaining doubts that Tiffany & Co. has entered a new era, they were certainly dispelled Thursday night at the blowout opening for the jeweler’s renovated Fifth Avenue Landmark store.

The store, which had been under gut renovation for four years, drew A-list celebrities like BTS’ Jimin, Pharrell, Anya Taylor-Joy, Michael B. Jordan, Gabriele Union and Dwyane Wade, and Florence Pugh; a fleet of hobnobbing billionaires, such as Stephen Schwarzman and Leon Black, or mere multimillionaires like Larry Gagosian; five Arnaults (including the richest man in the room and world, luxury titan Bernard Arnault); LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton executives including Sidney Toledano and Michael Burke; hundreds of journalists that the brand flew in from overseas — plus thousands of fans outside that made Fifth Avenue look like a parade route.

“I had to stop the car from three blocks away and walked here, it couldn’t make it through,” said Tiffany chief executive officer Anthony Ledru on the spectacle.

It was among the most extravagant fashion events New York has seen in recent memory. Tiffany welcomed guests into its Landmark and then built a tunnel on the sidewalk of 57th Street, where they were guided along to what had been the jeweler’s temporary flagship.

Except the “Flagship Next Door” was cleared out and refurnished especially for the evening — with feathered chandeliers, a Petrossian caviar bar, Dom Perignon Champagne, small porcelain dishes of sous vide chicken with elderflower garnishes on top and where the smell of truffle generally lingered in the air.

The scene was a study in the old and new guard. It was hard to make out how the tried-and-true Tiffany high jewelry collectors felt amid the stream of pulsating nightclub music from DJ Mark Ronson. One woman seemed to strike the right balance: she sashayed through Landmark’s revolving doors with a Schlumberger diamond wreath around her neck and a fuchsia vape in her mouth.

Partygoers got a first glimpse of the Tiffany Landmark’s uniforms that are specially made by Givenchy. The mock turtlenecks with embroidered Tiffany insignias and double-breasted, ’60s-style jackets are meant to represent “our love story with Audrey [Hepburn], our love story with Hubert de Givenchy — it’s a natural match,” said Ledru.

“I think this word gets overused a lot, but it’s just iconic — you think of New York, you think of Tiffany, you think of this building,” said Taylor-Joy, who was among the many Tiffany ambassadors on hand to dispense gushing praise on the building and event. She wore designs from Tiffany’s new Bird on a Rock high jewelry collection that launches along with Landmark and is among the first outings from artistic director Nathalie Verdeille.

Most celebrities in attendance had some type of Tiffany memory that they hold near and dear. “I have the Clinton pattern [of Tiffany flatware] and I actually served my dinner to President Clinton with the Clinton pattern silver — he had never heard of it,” said Martha Stewart.

Hailey Bieber, another Tiffany ambassador, showed up in a little snatched-waist Versace black dress in a TikTok-type ode to Hepburn. Her nails — long and ovular — were an iridescent shade of Tiffany Blue. “I’m calling them Tiffany glaze nails,” she said.

Tiffany seemed intent on the party reaching every sphere of online influence — they called on musicians, content creators and even online fitness gurus to attend and get the word out. Peloton master instructor Ally Love was among those viral names to seemingly pop out from most people’s screens and appear in the flesh — she showed up just before 9 p.m.

And that was around the time that fog started spreading across the event space’s stage — and out trotted a chorus line of eight Radio City Rockettes.

They were followed by a surprise performance from Katy Perry, who sang a full set. Before breaking into her 2008 hit “I Kissed a Girl,” she proclaimed, “I wasn’t supposed to sing this tonight, but it’s a special request from the Arnaults.” Bernard Arnault — along with his next-gen deputies Antoine, Alexandre, Frédéric and Jean — carefully watched from a balcony overhead.

WSJ : JPMorgan, PNC Submit Bids to Buy First Republic in Government-Led Sale

JPMorgan, PNC Submit Bids to Buy First Republic in Government-Led Sale
FDIC is expected to name a winner before First Republic opens Monday morning

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is reviewing bids for First Republic Bank FRC -43.30% and preparing to seize the lender, according to people familiar with the matter, weeks after a $100 billion deposit run shattered its business model.

Big banks including JPMorgan Chase JPM 0.87% & Co. and PNC Financial Services Group Inc. PNC 1.74% submitted offers for the troubled lender earlier Sunday, the people said, and the FDIC went back to the bidders with questions in the evening. The agency is expected to name a winner before First Republic opens Monday morning, the people said.

The March 10 failure of Silicon Valley Bank sent First Republic’s stock down sharply, spooking well-heeled customers with balances exceeding the FDIC’s $250,000 insurance limit. The stock has lost more than 90% of its value since early March.

The First Republic fire sale is an astonishing comedown for a lender that was long the envy of finance. With some $233 billion in assets at the end of the first quarter, it would be the second-largest bank to fail in U.S. history, behind Washington Mutual Inc. in 2008. Rounding out the top four are Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, a New York-based lender that also failed in March.

Analysts said exactly how regulators resolve First Republic will be important in shoring up confidence in the broader banking system. Some said they don’t expect a First Republic failure to kick off a new round of turmoil in the industry.

First Republic lost so many deposits so quickly that its business model no longer had much value, making it harder for the bank to raise capital, said Steven Kelly, a senior researcher at the Yale Program on Financial Stability.

“This is the last stages of that initial panic. First Republic’s problems started as a result of SVB and Signature. It was a run on the business model,” Mr. Kelly said. “This isn’t the story of 2008, where one bank went down and investors focused on the next biggest bank, which would wobble.”

First Republic’s business model was built around gathering big deposits from rich customers and paying little or no interest on them. The bank, in turn, offered low-interest mortgages to those very same customers.

The strategy began to fray after the Federal Reserve started raising rates to quell inflation. Last month’s customer panic doomed it.

A group of the nation’s biggest banks, including JPMorgan and PNC, came to the rescue with a $30 billion deposit. First Republic hired outside advisers to craft a plan to shore up its finances, but buyers and investors were unwilling to pump money into the bank absent government support.

The deposit run cost First Republic dearly. In its first-quarter earnings report last week, the bank said it filled the $100 billion hole left by fleeing depositors with expensive loans from the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank. The bank, in short, was facing a grim future where it would earn less on its loans than it was paying to borrow.

The earnings report sent the bank’s stock down nearly 50% in one day. It continued to tumble as the week went on and closed at $3.51 a share on Friday, down from $115 in early March.

Regulators and bankers hoped the panic had eased after the government stepped in to make uninsured depositors at SVB and Signature Bank whole. But First Republic’s badly damaged balance sheet left it with few good options.

Only a handful of banks could easily absorb First Republic’s assets and deposits. Some of those, such as Wells Fargo & Co., face regulatory hurdles to expansion. Others are still digesting recent deals for other banks. Some banks that took a look at First Republic opted not to bid, including U.S. Bancorp and Bank of America Corp. , according to people familiar with the matter.

Any sale that leads large banks to grow bigger could vex Democrats who have pushed for limits on industry concentration, including banking. But Rep. Ro Khanna (D., Calif.) said he disagreed with other progressive Democrats who have said the nation’s largest banks shouldn’t be allowed to get bigger by swallowing First Republic.

“I think that the FDIC needs to look at the lowest-cost alternative. That’s their mandate,” he said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “Right now, they may need to work with banks and private capital to save First Republic. That is the state we’re in.”

FT : Total’s chief tells investors European listing to blame for oil group’s tra

Total’s chief tells investors European listing to blame for oil group’s trading discount
Patrick Pouyanné makes clear moving French company’s listing to the US is not an option

The chief executive of TotalEnergies has complained to investors that the French oil group’s valuation gap with its US-listed rivals is down to its listing in Europe, not its profitability.

Patrick Pouyanné argued in several investor meetings that while Total’s operations were as profitable as Chevron’s, the French company was trading at a discount only because one was listed in Europe and the other in the US, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions.

However the Frenchman made clear that moving the company’s primary listing to the US was not an option partly for political reasons, they said.

One top-10 shareholder said Total considered moving the primary listing to the US but realised that “culturally it was too difficult”. A second shareholder said Pouyanné took the view that “if Total was US-listed it would be much better but, of course, it is impossible for Total to move its listing so it’s not on the cards”.

The comments underline growing concerns among Europe-listed groups with global operations over the yawning gap with US-listed peers in the past years, making them vulnerable to takeover bids or prompting them to explore moving their primary listings to the US to access a wider pool of investors.

ExxonMobil and Chevron are valued at about six times their cash flow on the US market, compared with about four times for Total, about three times for BP and Shell, which are both listed in the UK.


The Financial Times previously reported that Shell’s top executives in 2021 discussed the advantages of shifting the Anglo-Dutch energy group’s listing and headquarters to the US, but they ultimately decided that Shell would leave the Netherlands and consolidate its base and stock market listing in London.

Irene Himona, managing director for oil and gas at Société Générale, said Total leaving Paris for a primary listing, while hard to imagine, could not be ruled out.

“After the Shell relocation from Holland to the UK, I personally would never say ‘never’,” Himona said. “If nothing changes, at some distant point in time something has to give: either they move voluntarily or with encouragement from activist investors; or someone really big attempts to take them over; or, at the current [rate of share buybacks], they eventually buy themselves back and go private.”

A second top-10 Total shareholder said that “there’s a bit of fatigue” among the European oil majors including Total because “they are more advanced in their climate strategy but not recognised for the transition they’re making”.

Like BP and Shell, Total has committed to transitioning from selling fossil fuels alone to also providing low or zero-carbon energy, after facing intense pressure from European shareholders to tackle climate change. Yet investors have not rewarded the green drive, and Exxon and Chevron have stuck to their oil and gas roots more and have been rewarded by US shareholders more willing to back fossil fuel companies for longer.

One adviser to the French company said there was “no way” Pouyanné — who previously held advisory and chief of staff jobs in the French government before moving into the private sector — would be allowed to move headquarters, despite his frustrations.

Total declined to comment on Pouyanné’s conversations with investors but said the US was a vital market. The company remained “convinced” it could generate attractive returns by investing in renewables and pumping oil and gas, it said.

Total was founded by the French state in 1924 and listed in Paris in 1929 but the French government retained as much as 30 per cent of the company until the early 1990s. It is now the largest energy company in the Cac 40 index.

As the US grew more central to Total’s strategy, the group listed additional shares in New York in 1991. The company is the largest exporter of US liquefied natural gas and a major investor in North American renewables, where it has 0.9GW of renewable power installed and 1.6GW under construction. About 42 per cent of its shareholders are based in the US.