Business Of Fashion : Adidas Takes Small Step Forward While Mulling Yeezy Option

Adidas Takes Small Step Forward While Mulling Yeezy Options

Adidas AG has yet to decide on what to do with its mountain of unsold Yeezy sneakers but new chief executive officer Bjorn Gulden said its turnaround is nonetheless off to a good start.

The German sneaker maker still expects to post a loss of €700 million ($773 million) this year if it can’t sell the Yeezy products, though it’s making headway in improving operations and relations with suppliers and retailers, according to a statement Friday.

Adidas reported sales of €5.3 billion in the first quarter, roughly in line with a year ago and ahead of analysts’ estimates. Business was stronger in Latin America and parts of Asia, while the company is ramping up production of the classic Samba, Gazelle and Campus sneakers to serve high demand.

The shares rose as much as 6 percent in early German trading, the biggest intraday gain in three months.

This will be a bumpy year with disappointing numbers, and Adidas isn’t worried about maximizing its short-term financial results, Gulden said in the statement. Instead, it’s focused on building a strong base for a better 2024 and beyond.

That will require more markdowns to reduce the €5.7 billion inventory of unsold sneakers and apparel. While that figure is down from late December, the stockpiles are still too high for Adidas to really rebuild its brand momentum, the company said.

Adidas is still reviewing its options for the €1.2 billion pile of unsold Yeezy merchandise stemming from the cancelled collaboration with the rapper and designer Ye, formerly known as Kanye West. Adidas terminated that partnership in October after the performer made a string of antisemitic remarks.

Investors are looking for signs that Gulden is injecting fresh optimism into the brand since taking over as CEO in January. In nearly a decade leading cross-town rival Puma SE, he refocused that company on sports and roughly tripled its sales, including posting fast growth during the pandemic.

Gulden is looking to renew the focus at Adidas on performance sports, and working to speed up decision-making, including installing himself as the company’s head of global brands. One of his first moves has been scaling up production for hot-selling sneakers like the Samba, which in recent months began appearing on the feet of celebrities including Bella Hadid and Kylie Jenner.

WWD : Saint Laurent Produced a Godard Short Premiering at Cannes Film Festival

Saint Laurent Produced a Godard Short Premiering at Cannes Film Festival
Anthony Vaccarello has called it a "trailer to a film that will never exist." French New Wave pioneer Jean-Luc Godard died last year.

Fashion house Saint Laurent has produced a short film exalting French movie maverick Jean-Luc Godard’s last work, and it will premiere at the 76th annual Cannes Film Festival later this month.

Saint Laurent creative director Anthony Vaccarello describes it as the “trailer of a movie that will never exist.”

“Unconventional in its form, the short art project describes the ideas, references and visuals he envisioned for a film that never came to be, giving the viewer rare insight into a genius’ mind and process,” according to Saint Laurent, which last month established a subsidiary devoted to the full-fledged production of movies.

As reported, Saint Laurent Productions will make its debut at Cannes with two short films among the official selection: The other is “Strange Way of Life” by Pedro Almodóvar, a Western with a twist and a focus on the male protagonists, new for the Spanish director.

The Kering-owned fashion house is billing itself as the first to set up a registered subsidiary to produce films, rather than merely funding them — or dressing its stars.

The Godard short promises to detail the creative process of the legendary French-= Swiss auteur, a pioneer of the French New Wave film movement of the ‘60s.

Known for such films as “Breathless,” “Band of Outsiders,” “Pierrot le Fou” and “Alphaville,” Godard died last September at age 91.

According to Saint Laurent, Godard “changed the course of filmmaking with his innovative camera work and experimental narrative style, rejecting traditional conventions in favor of a more personal and artistic cinematic idiom.”

“I greatly admired Jean-Luc Godard, one of cinema’s most influential masterminds,” Vaccarello commented in a brief statement shared with WWD.

Saint Laurent also has feature-length projects in the works with filmmakers David Cronenberg and Paolo Sorrentino, perhaps best known for “The Great Beauty,” which won the Oscar for best foreign-language film in 2013.

Saint Laurent-produced films are bound to bring additional visibility to the brand and its aesthetic, since Vaccarello is to conceive Saint Laurent clothing and accessories in concert with each director.

The Cannes Film Festival revealed the 20-minute Godard short on Friday as part of the Cannes Classics & Cinéma de la Plage selection.

Its “Memories of Jean-Luc Godard” program also includes an exclusive documentary about him and the screening of a 4K restoration of his 1963 film “Le Mépris,” or “Contempt.”

WSJ : Google Plans to Make Search More ‘Personal’ with AI Chat and Video Clips

Google Plans to Make Search More ‘Personal’ with AI Chat and Video Clips
Changes aim to respond to queries that can’t be easily answered by traditional ‘10 blue links’ web results

Google is shifting the way it presents search results to incorporate conversations with artificial intelligence, along with more short video and social-media posts, a departure from the list of website results that has made it the dominant search engine for decades.

The changes represent a response to big shifts in the way people access information on the internet, including the emergence of AI bots like ChatGPT. They would nudge the service further away from its traditional format, known informally as the “10 blue links,” according to company documents and people familiar with the matter.

Google plans to make its search engine more “visual, snackable, personal, and human,” with a focus on serving young people globally, according to the documents. It plans to incorporate more human voices as part of the shift, supporting content creators in the same way it has historically done with websites, the documents say.

At its annual I/O developer conference this coming week, the search giant is expected to debut new features that allow users to carry out conversations with an artificial-intelligence program, a project code-named “Magi,” said other people familiar with the matter.

For years, Alphabet’s GOOG 0.96%increase; green up pointing triangle Google has made minimal tweaks to the look and feel of search, which powers an advertising business that made more than $162 billion in revenue last year. But that is changing with the fast rise of AI chatbots and short-video apps such as TikTok, both of which have captured the attention of younger users.

Broadly, Google plans to place greater emphasis on responding to queries that can’t be easily answered by traditional web results, according to internal reference documents outlining the company’s strategy for making changes to the search engine this year.

Google search visitors might be more frequently prompted to ask follow-up questions or swipe through visuals such as TikTok videos in response to their queries.

The company has already moved to integrate some online forum posts and short videos in search results, but it plans to emphasize such material even more in the future, according to the internal documents and people familiar with the matter.

Google executives have stressed to employees that the number of active websites has plateaued in recent years, said people familiar with the discussions. Internet users are increasingly turning to other apps to find information on everything from popular local restaurants to advice on how to be more productive.

“More than answers, we’ll help you when there’s no right answer,” Google executives said in the documents.

A Google spokeswoman said search has “always been an incredibly dynamic, rapidly evolving sector,” and the company has focused on a long-term approach to changing the service that includes integrating AI and visual features.

“As search evolves, delivering high-quality information and supporting a healthy, open web will remain core to our approach,” the spokeswoman added.

Google has the opportunity to lead a change in consumer behavior around internet search, but people will turn to other services if the company doesn’t move fast enough, said John Battelle, author of “The Search,” a history of Google published in 2005.

“It’s a really significant moment for the company, and I think they’re very well aware of it,” Mr. Battelle added.

Google’s search engine, the world’s most heavily trafficked website, has for years handled more than 90% of searches on computers and mobile devices, according to data provider Statcounter. In 2020, the Justice Department sued Google for its alleged dominance in the search market, the most significant U.S. antitrust suit since the government challenged Microsoft’s position in the personal computer software market in the 1990s. (The suit is expected to go to trial later this year.)

Since then, several new AI-powered apps have exploded in popularity, raising fresh challenges to Google’s power as a portal to the internet. Most recently, the ChatGPT bot developed by Microsoft-backed OpenAI has raised alarms inside Google, pushing leadership to speed up work on similar products.

Microsoft built the technology behind ChatGPT into its search engine Bing earlier this year, creating a version that could hold extended conversations with users. Smaller search engines also have raced to incorporate conversational AI features, hoping to win users by moving faster than Google.

Millions of people use Google for critical tasks, and websites such as online news outlets rely on the search engine for large chunks of their traffic. Those factors, along with the large amount of revenue tied to the product, have made it difficult to implement major changes in search.

“For them, it’s not about whether they have the talent and the team to do it. It’s more how worried they are about their image and shareholders,” said Aravind Srinivas, a former Google and OpenAI researcher who is chief executive of search startup Perplexity.

Perplexity, founded last year, has 2.8 million monthly active users of its conversational search engine, Mr. Srinivas said.

Chatbots such as ChatGPT have a tendency to confidently fabricate information and even sources. A recent study by Stanford University researchers of search engines using conversational AI technology found only 51.5% of sentences included proper citations, and more than a quarter of citations didn’t support the content of their associated sentences.

Earlier this year, a version of Microsoft’s Bing using the technology behind ChatGPT produced mistakes and disturbing responses for some users, prompting the company to call the product a work in progress and make several tweaks to its technology. Bing’s share of the search market has remained below 3% since Microsoft introduced the features in February, according to Statcounter.

Google executives have stressed that search products using conversational AI features should not upset website owners, in part by including source links, The Wall Street Journal reported. Bard, its answer to ChatGPT, included some links to outside sources when it was released in March, but Google stopped short of integrating it directly into search.

The company recently invited a large group of employees to test Magi before the features are introduced at the annual I/O conference May 10, said people familiar with the matter. The New York Times previously reported the name of the project.

One of the potential new search features will allow users to ask follow-up questions to their original queries, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said in an interview with the Journal last month.

“We are working to make sure it works well for users—they have a high bar, and we want to meet that bar,” Mr. Pichai said.

Google executives have also closely watched the fast rise of TikTok, owned by China-based ByteDance. Prabhakar Raghavan, a Google senior vice president overseeing the search engine, said at a conference in July last year that about 40% of young people turn to TikTok or Meta Platforms-owned Instagram when searching for restaurants, citing an internal study.

Incorporating more user-generated content in search results also raises a host of thorny issues. Platforms like TikTok can be powerful vectors for false and misleading information because people have a tendency to trust other human speakers, researchers said.

The shift will present Google “with the need to refine our definition of ‘trusted’ content, especially when there is no single right answer,” according to the documents outlining the company’s search strategy. Google will “give attribution and literacy tools to enable confidence in making use of the content,” according to the documents.

CrunchBase : The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Mavenir And Runway Lead In Do

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Mavenir And Runway Lead In Down Week

We are only only a few days into May, but things are slow. After a strong week of big rounds last week, only two raises came in at nine figures. Last week, a company had to raise at least $50 million to make the top 10, but not this one. One thing, however, that is similar to last — are a couple of pretty large biotech rounds.

1. (tied) Mavenir, $100M, network software: Mavenir is not having an issue raising cash in this down market. After raising $250 million last year, the network software provider locked up another large tranche of money, closing a $100 million round led by Siris. The Richardson, Texas-based company builds cloud-native software that allows enterprises and service providers to manage complex networks without relying on older telecom hardware such as routers and switches. This allows customers to scale operations more quickly on the cloud and without the expense of equipment. Aside from Siris — the company’s largest equity holder — the new round also included investment from “two highly strategic ecosystem partners,” according to Mavenir. Mavenir has been busy on the capital front in recent years. In 2022 the company raised $95 million in debt in the summer and then a big $155 million tranche led by Siris and Koch Strategic Platforms in October. Before those deals, in April 2021, Koch placed a huge bet on Mavenir, investing $500 million in the company.

1. (tied) Runway, $100M, AI: You may have heard generative AI is big right now. New York-based Runway became the latest startup in the sector to raise big — landing a $100 million round at a $1.5 billion valuation from a cloud service provider, according to Business Insider. The startup helped develop the AI image generator Stable Diffusion and launched its video-to-video generative AI app in April. The app lets users transform videos into different styles, such as claymation or watercolors. Founded in 2018, the company has raised nearly $200 million, per Crunchbase.

3. Convergent Therapeutics, $90M, biotech: Biotech was huge last week, and this week oncology startup Convergent Therapeutics continued that trend. The company, which is targeting prostate cancer, raised a $90 million Series A led by OrbiMed and RA Capital Management. The company is creating a pipeline of radiopharmaceuticals starting with a specific therapeutic dedicated to advanced prostate cancer. Convergent Therapeutics, which was spun out of a university lab at Cornell University in 2020, is also looking into other therapeutics to treat different types of cancers. Radiopharmaceuticals — which are injected into the body and stick to cancer cells — seem to have caught investors’ fancy. Abdera Therapeutics raised $142 million in Series A and B funding in April.

4. Initial Therapeutics, $75M, biotech: Biotech was not done for the week, however, as New York-based Initial Therapeutics closed a $75 million Series A from Apple Tree Partners — which launched the startup. The biotech firm develops new small molecule treatments focused on known targets that play key roles in cancer and other serious illnesses. Founded in 2020, the company has now raised $78.8 million, according to Crunchbase.

5. Simpplr, $70M, enterprise software: Company intranets can be handy — when done well — and clearly investors see the value. Employee experience platform Simpplr closed a $70 million Series D led by Sapphire Ventures. The Redwood City, California-based startup allows employees to create profiles, access the always valuable company handbook, and find other resources. Employers can use it to update policies, build social hubs and even deploy surveys. Such platforms have become more valuable as remote work has taken over and employees need a go-to source for company information from outside the office. Simpplr’s $70 million fundraising round is the third largest in this space so far. Rippling, a human resource management platform, raised $500 million in Series E funding back in March. Alera Group, an employee benefits management startup, raised $100 million back in April. Founded in 2014, this brings Simpplr’s total funding to $131 million.

6. Sourcepass, $65M, cybersecurity: New York-based IT services and cyber firm Sourcepass raised $65 million in funding led by Metropolitan Partners Group. Founded in 2021, Sourcepass has raised $135 million to date, per the company.

7. Redaptive, $50M, energy: Denver-based Redaptive added another $50 million to its Series E led by long-time investor Linse Capital. The new investment brings the round total to $250 million. Redaptive helps customers conserve energy and be more efficient, lowering costs and meeting goals to reduce their carbon footprints.

8. (tied) Duetti, $32M, music: New York-based music financing startup Duetti announced its launch and funding of $32 million, which included investment from the likes of Viola Ventures and Roc Nation. Founded in 2022, the company has now raised $39 million, per Crunchbase.

8. (tied) Impact Nano, $32M, manufacturing: Devens, Massachusetts-based Impact Nano, a chemical manufacturing startup, raised $32 million in successive rounds from Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Intel Capital and other investors. Founded in 2019, this is the company’s first funding announcement, according to Crunchbase data.

10. (tied) Uwill, $30M, mental health: Natick, Massachusetts-based Uwill, a mental health and wellness startup for college students, completed a $30 million Series A led by Education Growth Partners. Founded in 2020, the company has raised $38.5 million, per Crunchbase.

10. (tied) MayMaan Research, $30M, energy: Hollywood, Florida-based clean energy and power generation technology startup MayMaan Research raised a $30 million Series A from Wave Equity Partners. Founded in 2013, it is the company’s first outside funding, per Crunchbase.

Big global deals
There were not a lot of large U.S. rounds, and there also were not a lot outside the country. In fact, only one funding from outside the U.S. broke the top five global rounds.
  • Singapore-based fintech startup Advance Intelligence Group raised an $80 million private equity round.

The Epoch Times : Scientists Found New Psychoactive Drugs in Wastewaters

Scientists Found New Psychoactive Drugs in Wastewaters

A new study has identified over a dozen new psychoactive drugs in the wastewater of various sites worldwide.

The trend of increasing new psychoactive substances (NPS) and the difficulty for law enforcement to control their circulation prompted a study by the University of Queensland, Australia, which was part of an international wastewater surveillance program.

The study covered a three-year period—from 2019 to 2022—and 47 cities in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Korea, China and Brazil.

The lead scientist Dr Richard Bade told UQ News that they detected 18 NPS in the wastewater samples from around the world.

“In Australia, we found seven new psychoactive substances, including mephedrone, ethylone and eutylone, which all have a similar effect to MDMA or cocaine,” Bade said.

“We also found an increase in similar drugs in Europe, where there were high levels of 3-methylmethcathinone, particularly in Spain and Slovenia.”

What Are NPS Drugs
New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) are synthetic or semi-synthetic substances that are designed to mimic the effects of traditional illicit drugs such as cocaine, cannabis, or amphetamines.

They are sometimes called “designer drugs” or “legal highs” because they are often created to circumvent existing drug laws and regulations.

NPS can be chemically similar to illegal drugs, or they may have entirely new chemical structures that have not been previously identified.

Some examples of NPS include synthetic cannabinoids, cathinones, and phenethylamines.

These substances are often marketed as legal alternatives to traditional drugs, and are sold online, in head shops, or on the street.

One of the main concerns with NPS is that their effects are often not well understood, and they can be much more potent than traditional drugs, which can lead to a range of health risks, including overdose, addiction, and long-term health consequences.

As NPS are often marketed as “legal highs”, many people assume that they are safe to use, but this is not the case.

It’s important to remember that just because a substance is legal or unregulated it does not mean that it is safe or without risk.

Why Do People Use Illicit Drugs?
People reach for the new psychoactive substances because they are able to mimic the effect of already known illicit drugs but lack any legal restrictions.

“These substances are synthesised to replace banned substances, which means they have a slightly different molecular structure to stay ahead of the law,” explains Bade.

“They are generally manufactured in smaller quantities than traditional illicit drugs, making it difficult for law enforcement to control the circulation.”

The authors state in their paper that they attribute the use of illicit drugs to the societal burden.

Their study showed that the highest consumption of NPS was recorded around the New Year period, indicating that the consumption goes up during parties and festivals.

In addition, the lockdowns around the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the use of those drugs, according to the researchers.

“Harsh lockdowns and restrictions across the world meant people weren’t participating in traditional new year festivities, which was reflected in our results,” said Bade.

Types of NPS Specific to Global Location
The researchers also pointed out that the NPS they identified seemed to have geographic ties.

For example, mitragynine was primarily found in sites throughout the United States; eutylone and 3-methylmethcathinone were at high amounts in the wastewaters of New Zealand and several countries in Europe; 2F-deschloroketamine was found in Italy, Iceland and mainly in South-East Asia, especially in China; methoxetamine and methiopropamine predominantly in Australia.

Another conclusive finding was that the most commonly found class of NPS were the synthetic cathinones, which is a type of amphetamine known to induce the production of the ‘feel-good” or “happy” hormone dopamine.

Overall, the authors think that they have achieved the goal of their study which showed the importance of tackling this issue via regular annual and systematic wastewater analyses on a global scale.

“It is imperative to monitor the use of these drugs given our limited knowledge of their specific effects, how they interact with other drugs, and the harm they cause when consumed,” said Bade.

“International wastewater surveillance can allow us to identify what new psychoactive substances are being used globally and how these trends spread across continents.

“Adopting an annual wastewater analysis approach for the surveillance of these compounds is a cost-effective and ethical way for organisations to see what is trending and where educational messaging would make an impact.”

What Are Psychoactive Drugs?
Psychoactive drugs affect the central nervous system and alter brain function, causing changes in perception, mood, consciousness, and behaviour.

These drugs can be legal, such as prescription medications used to treat various mental and physical health conditions, or illegal, such as recreational drugs that are abused for their mind-altering effects.

Psychoactive drugs can be categorized into different classes based on their chemical structure, mechanism of action, and the effects they produce. Some of the most commonly used classes of psychoactive drugs include:

  • Stimulants: These drugs increase activity in the brain and body, leading to increased alertness, energy, and euphoria. Examples include caffeine, cocaine, and amphetamines.
  • Depressants: These drugs slow down activity in the brain and body, leading to feelings of relaxation, drowsiness, and reduced anxiety. Examples include alcohol, benzodiazepines, and opioids.
  • Hallucinogens: These drugs alter perception and mood, causing visual and auditory hallucinations and profound changes in consciousness. Examples include LSD, psilocybin, and DMT.
  • Cannabinoids: These drugs are derived from the cannabis plant and produce a range of effects, including relaxation, euphoria, altered perception, and pain relief. Examples include THC and CBD.

It’s important to note that while some psychoactive drugs may have beneficial effects when used appropriately under medical supervision, many of them can be highly addictive, lead to physical and psychological dependence, and have a range of adverse health consequences.

FT : SEC pays whistleblower $279mn in largest-ever award

SEC pays whistleblower $279mn in largest-ever award
Payment is more than double the previous record granted by the US securities regulator

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has paid out its largest-ever award to a whistleblower, almost $279mn, the regulator announced on Friday.

The award is more than double the previous record amount of $114mn, which was announced in October 2020.

In a heavily redacted SEC order dated May 5, the agency did not name the person who was paid the reward, nor did it say which enforcement actions resulted in the payment, a policy designed to protect whistleblowers who want to remain anonymous.

“The whistleblower’s sustained assistance including multiple interviews and written submissions was critical to the success of these actions,” said Nicole Creola Kelly, head of the SEC’s whistleblower office. “While the whistleblower’s information did not prompt the opening of the SEC’s investigation, their information expanded the scope of misconduct charged.”

The SEC’s order said two other people came forward with tips related to the enforcement actions, but the agency did not pay them. One of those people’s information “did not advance or impact the investigation”, the SEC said. Another person’s allegations were “vague” and “insubstantial”.

Established as part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank act, the SEC’s whistleblower office is designed to encourage people with information about financial misconduct to help the agency bring cases.

To get paid, whistleblowers must provide information that leads to an SEC enforcement case of more than $1mn. Whistleblowers can be paid between 10 per cent and 30 per cent of the total of the fines collected.

The SEC has said it has paid out more than $1bn since the start of the programme in 2011.

“The size of today’s award — the highest in our programme’s history — not only incentivises whistleblowers to come forward with accurate information about potential securities law violations, but also reflects the tremendous success of our whistleblower programme,” said Gurbir Grewal, head of the SEC’s enforcement division.

FT : UK renewable energy: the long wait for grid connections must end

UK renewable energy: the long wait for grid connections must end
To get projects up and running faster, one idea is to cherry pick the ones that are likeliest to get built

For the Brits, queue-barging goes against the grain. But first-come-first-served is a poor way to manage the slew of renewable energy projects seeking a connection to the grid. With a backlog of 257 gigawatts, the queue is slowing the UK’s progress towards net zero. New applicants are receiving connection dates more than a decade into the future.

Getting a lot of renewables built and connected to the power grid is crucial if the UK is to reach its goal of net zero power by 2035. To date, some 83GW of low-carbon capacity — renewable and nuclear — has been connected, contributing almost half of the UK’s electricity in 2022. National Grid’s future energy scenarios suggest Britain needs 123-147GW by 2030. That implies a huge ramp-up in the rate of construction, especially for solar and offshore wind.

These numbers also suggest that there are more than three times as many projects in the holding pattern as are likely to be needed. Many exist in name only. The system operator, National Grid ESO, is alive to this problem. It has been trying to get zombies to leave the queue by removing the penalty to do so, and is working to speed up the current connections process. That is not likely to be enough.


To get projects up and running faster, one idea is to cherry pick the ones that are likeliest to get built. Octopus Energy has suggested the UK take a leaf out of Australia’s book, giving priority connections to projects that have their permitting and financing in place. The system operator might also highlight the areas in which it does have spare grid capacity so that keen developers can rush to build where they will not need to wait for network reinforcements.

Such queue-barging is unlikely to be popular with projects that already have connection dates. But other countries, such as Germany and France, already restrict applications to projects with all their paperwork in place. Australia, which used to have a system akin to the UK’s, has changed the rules. With such a monumental task ahead, the power system needs to break this gridlock.

Barrons : Finally, the Sun Is Shining on European Banks. It May Not Last.

Finally, the Sun Is Shining on European Banks. It May Not Last.

It has been a long time since investors were bullish on European bank stocks. The iShares MSCI Europe Financials EUFN +2.18% exchange-traded fund has lost 10% over the past 10 years, while shares of U.S. peers doubled. European banks trade at an average of 0.8 times tangible book value, says Elias Chrysostomou, an analyst covering the sector for T. Rowe Price. The U.S. ratio is 1.2.

Tables may be turning. As the U.S. wraps up its third big bank rescue in seven weeks with JPMorgan Chase JPM +1.95% ’s (ticker: JPM) absorption of First Republic Bank, the European Union and the United Kingdom have remained relatively undisturbed. The continent’s one financial implosion, Swiss-based Credit Suisse, had been building for years and could safely be called idiosyncratic.

Markets have noticed. European bank shares are nearly back where they were before Silicon Valley Bank collapsed in early March. U.S. financials are down 10%.

More gains are ahead as the European Central Bank and Bank of England end a decade of near-zero interest rates, allowing banks to earn more spread on their core lending businesses, says Johann Scholtz, sector equity analyst at Morningstar. “We see a structural increase in profitability. We’re quite optimistic on a number of names.”

European banks’ deposits are stickier than those across the Atlantic, Scholtz says, not least because national barriers limit depositors’ options. In the Netherlands, for instance, three banks control virtually the whole nation’s savings. That protects them from the runs that undermined SVB, First Republic Bank, and Signature Bank in the U.S.

European and U.K. regulators also require all banks to regularly mark to market their securities holdings. This arcane nuance has become critical, as the U.S. exempted houses with less than $250 billion in assets from the requirement in 2019. The three banks that went under hid losses on bonds they bought at lower interest rates, until their sudden revelation spurred panic.

One of Scholtz’s top picks is Dutch champion ING Groep ING +3.76% (ING), because “70% of its earnings are geared to interest rates.” He also likes Spanish-based Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria BBVA +1.90% (BBVA), though mostly for its dominant franchise in Mexico. His U.K. favorite is Lloyds Banking Group LLOY +1.00% (LYG.UK) and in Scandinavia, Sweden’s Svenska Handelsbanken (SHBA.Sweden), for their standout operational efficiency.

Not everyone is so keen. Rising interest rates may give to the banks in the form of wider lending margins. But they can also take away by slowing the economy and spreading distress among borrowers. Current share prices “imply a mild recession” in Europe, Chrysostomou says. That may be too optimistic. “I would prefer that prices reflect a deeper recession to embed a margin of comfort,” he says.

Bank stocks are largely a proxy for their underlying economies, argues Manish Singh, chief investment officer at Crossbridge Capital Group. It makes little long-term sense to bet on slow-growth European economies instead of a more vigorous U.S. “European banks can probably outperform over the next three to six months, but not the next three to five years,” he says.

Singh does own one industry stock, BNP Paribas (BNP.France), which has a “strong franchise” and too-big-to-fail status in its native France. He “might feel comfortable” with U.K.-based HSBC (HSBA.UK).

Governments care less about bank profits than systemic stability for depositors and the national treasury. It’s likely that Washington will look closely at Europe’s tighter regulation in the wake of the recent debacles. Investors may want to look, too, for a change.

Barrons : Biofuel Stocks Are Sputtering. They Could Soon Get a Jump Start.

Biofuel Stocks Are Sputtering. They Could Soon Get a Jump Start.

Billions of gallons of fuel refined from cooking oil, french fry grease, landfills, and farm byproducts are being pumped into the engines of American vehicles every year. As long as people keep planting corn and eating fast food, there’s no imminent shortage of oil to pump into tanks. But there has been a shortage of cash to pay for it lately, stalling the industry’s growth and raising questions about its future.

Following a selloff in the industry that has pushed several stocks down more than 20% in the past year, some analysts now see buying opportunities. Among the names that are receiving positive buzz are Darling Ingredients (ticker: DAR) and Opal Fuels (OPAL).

The industry’s problems stem from upheaval in the market for carbon credits. California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard, which went into effect in 2011, has been a key growth driver for the industry. It is designed to lower the overall carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state by establishing a credit and debit system for fuels. To comply, carbon emitters such as refiners need to produce cleaner fuels or buy enough credits from renewable fuel producers to offset their greenhouse gases. It’s so important to the biofuels industry—paying out an average of $4.3 billion annually over the past three years—that nearly all the renewable diesel produced in the country gets shipped to California to take advantage of it. But the value of the credits has fallen steadily since 2020—they’re paying out 63% less per ton than they did at their peak because of an oversupply. With more credits being produced than carbon-emitters need to buy, the value of each credit has declined.

The federal government has been running its own clean-fuels program since 2005, requiring that refiners blend certain renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel or pay for credits. But the Environmental Protection Agency’s latest clean fuel volume mandates are lower than some producers had hoped, and credit prices have slipped for products such as biogas.

The industry’s future will depend in part on whether the state and federal credit values rise, and which fuels are prioritized. The fate of at least a dozen companies—and major investments in the industry by companies like BP (BP) and Chevron (CVX)—hangs in the balance.

The price crash has “put everybody on ice,” says Eric McAfee, the CEO of biofuels company Aemetis (AMTX), whose stock is down 78% in the past year. “The impact is a lack of investment,” he says. “When something is not happening, it’s much harder for people to see the pain.” The result is that you’re “stuck with the same amount of high pollution, high-cost imported crude oils you had last year.”

The industry’s stagnation isn’t just a problem for the companies. The International Energy Agency says biofuels production will have to quadruple from 2021 levels by 2030 and make up 15% of global transportation fuel—up from 3.6%—in order to limit harsh climate-change impacts. Biofuels are considered the best near-term solution to decarbonize heavy equipment because electric-vehicle batteries are simply too heavy to support trucks right now, and the tech to electrify airplanes is decades away from being used at scale.

Most biofuels still cost considerably more than fossil fuels to make, so government policies play a key role in bridging the gap. There are companies like Amazon.com (AMZN) that buy cleaner fuels to reach a self-imposed net-zero goal, but they remain outliers. In the fourth quarter of last year, the value of credits tied to federal and state policies amounted to more than 100% of the adjusted earnings for Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE), a Southern California company that makes renewable natural gas for use in transportation, according to Raymond James. As a result, the company’s stock has taken a big hit as the value of credits has fallen; the stock is down 28% over the past year. Darling Ingredients, a renewable diesel producer, is down 22%. Opal Fuels, another gas producer, is down 26%.

The drops come despite the fact that several kinds of renewable fuels are showing they can be viable replacements for fossil fuels. Biofuels are nothing new, but the market has expanded dramatically in the past few years. The best-known biofuel is ethanol, which is mostly made from corn and has been blended with gasoline for decades; it still makes up about 70% of the biofuels market.

But other kinds of fuels are quickly making their way into fuel tanks around the country, thanks to government support and technological advances. About 5% of U.S. diesel fuel is now made up of biodiesel or renewable diesel, two forms of carbon-friendly fuel with somewhat different chemical compositions. Renewable diesel can be used as a direct replacement for traditional diesel, whereas biodiesel must be blended at a lower percentage rate. That’s helped spur quick adoption, with renewable diesel capacity quadrupling in the past four years. By 2025, renewable diesel is likely to account for the majority of diesel fuel used on the West Coast, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Major refining companies—including Valero (VLO), Marathon Petroleum (MPC), and CVR Energy (CVI)—are all investing in expanding capacity for renewable diesel. Chevron is also expanding capacity, after buying renewable diesel and biodiesel producer Renewable Energy Group in 2022.

But all that added capacity has begun to overwhelm the California market, resulting in an excess of low-carbon credits. The accumulated bank of excess credits—which can be used in future years—could cover at least half a year’s worth of carbon emissions without a single ounce of biofuel being sold in the state. That oversupply has caused the credits to crash.

Andy Walz, who heads up oil products for Chevron in the Americas, including its expanding portfolio of renewable fuels, said in an interview that the decline isn’t going to stop the company’s investments. “Policies do move around and prices like this move around, and we’re prepared to weather through it and continue our strategy,” he says.

The impact has been harder on renewable natural gas, which is more dependent than diesel on the credits. RNG, which is mostly made of methane, is captured from landfills, sewage, and animal manure and can be piped around the country like the traditional product. There are 281 RNG facilities operating in North America, but the industry makes up less than 1% of U.S. natural-gas production. BP bought landfill-gas producer Archaea Energy last year, with plans to quintuple its capacity. While big companies are expected to continue their expansion projects, some smaller producers say that low credit prices in California have slowed their development.

Normally, one oversaturated market wouldn’t sink an industry. But biofuels producers have limited options. Oregon and Washington recently started up their own low-carbon programs, and British Columbia has one, too, but none are as substantial as California. Federal renewable credits have been helpful but can’t on their own support the industry, analysts say.

To help bridge the gap, some senators have discussed the possibility of a national low-carbon standard. Sen. Tom Carper, a Democrat from Delaware, said at a February hearing that a federal standard “can provide certainty, predictability, and flexibility for all stakeholders while also spurring innovation.” But Republicans disagreed, with Sen. Shelley Capito, a Republican from West Virginia, warning that a federal standard could cause gasoline and diesel prices to rise. Analysts say that the extra compliance costs for refiners can end up trickling down to consumers, and are one reason California’s gasoline prices are higher than elsewhere.

“I doubt my state and many others, particularly in rural America, will want to import the West Coast’s policies,” Capito said.

Given the disagreement, and growing concerns about inflation, analysts doubt a low-carbon standard could pass at the federal level. “I don’t see how the U.S. government is going to develop a national LCFS,” says Megan Boutwell, president of transportation fuels consulting firm Stillwater Associates. But she does expect state proposals to do better. New York, New Mexico, Illinois, and other states are considering their own low-carbon standards to meet their own net-zero goals. A patchwork of state benefits could support the industry’s expansion goals.

New state programs are just one reason that analysts are becoming more optimistic about the industry. “I would say that the industry is going through a much-needed reckoning,” says Matthew Blair, an analyst at Tudor, Pickering, Holt who covers biofuels. The days of “growth at all costs” are over, Blair says. “The companies are behaving more as regular businesses.”

The California Air Resources Board is planning to tighten standards by next year. Analysts expect credit prices to rise considerably—if not back to their 2020 highs above $200, at least to well above $100. Since the board held a meeting on the program in February, prices are already up, from $62 to a recent $82. The EPA is also expected to shift its rules in a way that boosts the value of credits known as renewable identification numbers, or RINs, Opal Fuels co-CEO Jon Maurer said in a recent interview.

Maurer thinks the best sign that the industry will bounce back is that bigger players have moved in. Both BP and Shell (SHEL) have announced multibillion-dollar acquisitions of RNG companies in the past year. “This is a big groundswell of support in our industry,” he says.

Blair thinks Opal itself could be “an attractive takeout candidate,” which is one reason he rates it at Buy. He also likes Darling Ingredients.

Another source of optimism on biofuels is the emergence of a new market for cleaner aviation fuel. Oils from beef, soybeans, and other sources can be refined in such a way to make them viable replacements for jet fuel, a market that’s a major contributor to climate change. The biggest U.S. airlines have committed to use much more of the cleaner stuff, known as sustainable aviation fuel, over the next decade, with United Airlines and others even pledging $100 million to projects that can jump-start the industry.

The Inflation Reduction Act also included extra subsidies for the air fuel, as have states including Illinois. Calumet Specialty Products Partners (CLMT), the biggest U.S. producer of the fuel, just started making 1,000 barrels a day at a repurposed Montana refinery it owns. That’s a minuscule portion of the seven million barrels of jet fuel used around the world every day, but it’s expected to ramp quickly. “We’re at the infantile stage of what we think is going to be an explosive growth story,” says Calumet CEO Todd Borgmann. The Montana site gives Calumet access to cheap feedstocks and end markets including Canada and California that are willing to pay up for clean jet fuel. After a decade of losses, analysts expect Calumet to swing to a profit this year, and quadruple earnings by 2026.

Raymond James analyst Pavel Molchanov thinks it’s worth buying Clean Energy Fuels on expectations that credits will rise, though he also issued a warning to investors. “This stock’s always-volatile attributes—it is emphatically not a buy-and-hold name—makes it essential to be tactical, and that means short-term trading calls,” he wrote.

McAfee, the Aemetis CEO, says the industry may not appeal to fearful investors. “This is a time for sophisticated investors to make an amazing amount of money, because the market’s just simply wrong,” he says.

For now, a bet on these companies is dependent on supportive political policy and tech advancements coming together at the same time. If those two forces do meet, the stocks could rise like a jet, regardless of what’s powering the engine.

Barrons : Weight-Loss Drugs Will Be Blockbusters. Here’s the Stock to Buy.

Weight-Loss Drugs Will Be Blockbusters. Here’s the Stock to Buy.
Everyone is talking about Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro and Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic. Now, the drugs are poised to go from conversation starters to profit makers.

In the year since Eli Lilly LLY -0.15% announced trial results showing that tirzepatide—best known by the brand name Mounjaro—helped patients drop more than 20% of their weight, the drug has become the most talked about, and most hyped, pharmaceutical in recent memory.

In the year since Eli Lilly LLY -0.15% announced trial results showing that tirzepatide—best known by the brand name Mounjaro—helped patients drop more than 20% of their weight, the drug has become the most talked about, and most hyped, pharmaceutical in recent memory.
In recent months, Lilly’s (ticker: LLY) drug, and a similar one from Novo Nordisk NOVO.B -2.60% (NVO), have joined the pantheon of culture-reshaping pharmaceuticals that includes the birth control pill, antidepressant Prozac, and erectile dysfunction drug Viagra. Lilly and Novo shares, meanwhile, have soared. Each company now has a market value of around $400 billion, making them the second- and third-largest in all of Big Pharma. That’s a neat trick given that their revenue is about 25% to 30% of that of industry leader Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), which has a market cap of $425 billion.

There’s little doubt that Lilly’s tirzepatide and its Novo competitor, semaglutide, will be some of the best-selling drugs of the decade. For investors, however, it’s time to separate the opportunity from the hype.

Big risks remain for the two companies, including questions of what health benefits they can prove for the medicines, who will pay for them, and what competitors might emerge. And for anyone looking at buying into the companies now, there’s the matter of whether the sky-high expectations for the drugs are already reflected in the companies’ share prices, or if there’s still room for upside.

Below, Barron’s guide to navigating this new era of obesity medicine.

What’s so revolutionary about these drugs?
The first thing to know is that we’re talking about two drugs—Lilly’s tirzepatide and Novo’s semaglutide—which are marketed under a variety of names and formulations, depending on the condition they are intended to treat.

Novo sells semaglutide as Ozempic, an injection for Type 2 diabetes; Wegovy, an injection for obesity; and Rybelsus, a pill for Type 2 diabetes.

For now, Lilly’s tirzepatide is sold only as Mounjaro, an injection to treat Type 2 diabetes. But the company will likely have a new name to add to its marketing roster soon: In late April, it announced results of a Phase 3 trial finding that Type 2 diabetes patients using the drug lost 15.7% of their body weight when taking tirzepatide. Lilly says it will finalize its application for approval of the drug as an obesity treatment and, if all goes smoothly, the FDA nod could come as soon as the end of this year.

Both drugs are significantly better at lowering blood sugar and promoting weight loss than previous medicines. They work by mimicking natural hormones that trigger the body to produce more insulin and slow digestion, making people feel fuller for longer.

Weight loss, in particular, has been a struggle for drugmakers. Virtually all previous attempts have been ineffective and/or dangerous; the list of weight loss drugs pulled from the market over safety concerns is a long one.

But Novo and Lilly’s drugs appear to be safe (though both have significant side effects) and their efficacy is remarkable. Patients on Lilly’s tirzepatide lost 22.5% of their body weight on average in one trial, while patients on the Novo drug lost 14.9% of their body weight in a separate trial. By comparison, an older Novo drug called Saxenda, which went on the market about a decade ago, cut patients’ body weights by only 7.4%.

When will the drugs be available?
Lilly’s Mounjaro and Novo’s Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelsus are already on the market, though high demand has kept them in short supply. Both companies have said they are ramping up production. Novo said in April it had a new contract manufacturer ready to go, and Lilly has said it would double its capacity to make Mounjaro and similar drugs by the end of the year.

If Lilly’s bid for approval to use tirzepatide for weight loss is approved by the FDA, the drug would likely be available immediately. (Meanwhile, there are widespread reports that Mounjaro is already being used for that purpose off-label.)

Are competitors coming?
Probably. Pfizer (PFE) says it has a pill under development that works similarly to tirzepatide and semaglutide, while Amgen AMGN 2.00% (AMGN) is testing a weight-loss drug that uses a different mechanism. Lilly also has a number of other weight-loss drugs in its pipeline, including a pill called orforglipron, which could launch in 2027; SVB Securities analyst David Risinger expects it could reach $9.9 billion in sales in 2030.

That said, drug development is an uncertain business. A reminder of that fact came this March, when shares of the biotech Altimmune (ALT) plunged after the company disclosed that a significant share of patients in a closely watched trial of its new weight-loss drug dropped out due to gastrointestinal issues.

Regardless, analysts say the weight-loss market is big enough to accommodate a number of drugs. In a note last year, Cowen analyst Michael Nedelcovych wrote that he expects obesity drug sales to hit $30 billion by 2030—a number that doesn’t include the Type 2 diabetes indication. “The market is going to be very significant, if indeed these companies can prove that there are substantial health benefits beyond just the weight loss,” says Risinger.

Just how big could the overall market be?
At an investment conference early this year, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said that his company expects the combined obesity and Type 2 diabetes market for drugs in this category to hit $90 billion globally by 2030. That kind of estimate is supported by the extremely widespread nature of the two conditions: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 41.9% of American adults are obese, and about 1 in 10 have diabetes.

And because these medicines aren’t curative, patients will probably need to take them for a long time, expanding the drugs’ earnings potential. For example, analyst expectations for peak sales of Mounjaro—in both its diabetes and obesity formulations—include a heady $100 billion a year (Geoff Meacham of BofA Securities) and a more modest, but still impressive, $40 billion (Jefferies analyst Akash Tewari). For context: Even the smaller of those figures is nearly twice peak sales of the best-selling therapeutic in history, AbbVie ABBV 0.45%’s (ABBV) Humira.

How much do these drugs cost, and who will pay?
The drugs cost around $1,000 a month, depending on indication and dosing. For patients prescribed the drugs to treat diabetes, payment works as it does for most medicines: Drugmakers negotiate insurance coverage with pharmacy benefit managers, and coverage builds slowly over time. Today, just under 60% of people on commercial insurance plans and Medicare have access to Mounjaro, according to Lilly.

When the drugs are prescribed as obesity treatments, though, it’s a different story. Lingering debates over whether obesity should be considered a disease mean insurers often don’t cover weight-loss drugs, and federal law bars Medicare’s prescription drug benefit from paying for them.


Investors and analysts say they expect insurer coverage to expand in the face of patient demand. Still, private insurers have signaled that even as they begin to cover Novo’s drug for obesity (the company says around 40 million Americans now have access to Wegovy through their insurance), not every overweight person will be eligible. “We need to really be clear about which patients really do benefit from these medicines, and make sure we properly understand how they’re going to use those medicines,” Andrew Witty, CEO of UnitedHealth Group (UNH), one of the country’s largest health insurers, said on an investor call in April. Days later, an executive at health insurer Elevance Health ELV 1.70% (ELV) said the company doesn’t cover weight-loss drugs, except when required to by state law.

Lilly and Novo haven’t yet gotten study results proving that their obesity drugs not only help non-diabetics lose weight, but also lower their risk of heart disease and stroke. Both are currently conducting trials to provide this data (Novo’s is expected to produce results in the coming months; Lilly’s is still years out). If the results are positive, it will be much harder for insurers to resist covering the drugs as obesity treatments.

Meanwhile, legislative efforts to roll back the law that stops Medicare from covering weight-loss medications have been ongoing. If they are successful, the program could be in for an enormous bill. A New England Journal of Medicine paper published in March found that if only 10% of eligible Medicare patients took Novo’s drug, it would cost Medicare $26.8 billion a year, equivalent to 18.5% of spending on Medicare’s Part D prescription drug benefit in 2019.

What could go wrong for Novo and Lilly?
The biggest risk for Novo and Lilly is that trials designed to prove that the drugs lower rates of stroke and heart attack in patients without diabetes fail. In that case, insurance coverage in the obesity indications would remain limited. Yes, the drugs would still be megablockbusters, but not on the scale many are expecting.

There are other, less obvious threats. One is the impact of Medicare price negotiations, set to go into effect in 2026 for Medicare’s prescription drug program under last year’s Inflation Reduction Act. Medicare currently covers both Novo and Lilly’s drugs for diabetes, and Novo’s Ozempic could be eligible for negotiation as early as 2027. No one really knows how the negotiations will play out, but it’s possible that lower Medicare prices for Ozempic could also impact the prices Lilly can fetch for its competitive drug.

(Lilly executives note, however, that a head-to-head trial comparing weight loss in non-diabetic obese and overweight patients on Novo’s drug and Lilly’s drug is slated to produce data by 2025. If Lilly were to win that face-off, it could help the company maintain higher prices.)

Then there are the threats from competitors. If the forthcoming Pfizer or Amgen drug were to match or outperform Novo and Lilly’s products, those glowing analyst projections might come down to earth.

Are Lilly and Novo shares a good bet?
Bulls see an enormous long-term opportunity in Lilly. “Can Mounjaro, plus the pipeline of products that Lilly is going to launch into the obesity market over the next five to 10 years, create a massive sales opportunity that is here to stay?” asks Debra Netschert, a managing director at Jennison Associates, who is one of the managers of the PGIM Jennison Health Sciences fund (PHLAX). “I believe it can.”

Lilly shares doubled from the start of 2021 through the end of 2022, and the stock has continued to climb. This week saw Lilly shares hit an all-time high as the company reported positive results on a Phase 3 trial of its Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Analysts are mixed on the full implications of the new data, and there are real safety issues with the drug, but Lilly avoided a worst-case scenario of the study failing, removing what had been a near-term worry for investors.

Novo shares have also more than doubled over the past two years, and the company says its Wegovy rollout is picking up steam as supply capacity increases.

For investors looking to make a bet on the obesity drugs, Lilly is the more promising of the two companies, despite the stock run-up. Analysts predict Lilly’s earnings per share to grow by 23% on a compound annual basis from 2022 through 2027, according to FactSet—better than Novo’s 17%, and well above expectations for the rest of the sector. Merck, by contrast, is expected to grow earnings by 8% over the same period.

“We’re talking about a company that has extraordinary growth potential, probably more than four times that of the pharmaceutical group over all,” says SVB’s Risinger.

And while both companies have robust drug pipelines, Lilly’s has a slight edge. In addition to its obesity pill and retatritude, another obesity injectable, the company has a host of potentially major drugs in the late stages of development, including the Alzheimer’s drug donanemab, newly-approved cancer drug Jaypirca, and dermatitis treatment lebrikizumab.

Combine those factors with the early data suggesting that Lilly’s tirzepatide is a more effective weight-loss agent than Novo’s Ozempic (a head-to-head trial in the works), and Lilly looks to be a winning bet on the obesity-drug boom.