(ZH) John Kerry Skewered By French TV Host After Condemning Putin Invasion: "Why

John Kerry Skewered By French TV Host After Condemning Putin Invasion: "Why Isn't Bush Judged In The Same Way?"

John Kerry, who is Biden's special presidential envoy for climate, came up against rare pushback when he tried to issue the usual invective and talking points on Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Putin's aggression while speaking on French television in Paris.
But a French TV anchor wasn't having it, and confronted Kerry over US hypocrisy, given Washington has mounted multiple invasions of sovereign countries in recent decades, especially since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Well-known French journalist Darius Rochebin during the Sunday night interview on news channel LCI posed the following: "We have to judge Putin for crimes of aggression, of course. But you, the Americans, you committed the crime of aggression in Iraq." Rochebin then asked Kerry: "These countries of the Global South say, should we judge George Bush? Why isn’t Bush judged in the same way?
Kerry simply tried to reject the comparison, without explanation, shooting back "no". Rochebin quickly interjected, "Why?"
"Because there’s never even been a direct process or accusation or anything with respect to President Bush himself," Kerry deflected. "Have there been abuses in the course of that war, yes."
Rochebin didn't let go after this nonsensical attempt to appeal to a legal "process" and mere "abuses" (in a war that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians). The journalist pressed: "Was it not a crime of aggression to enter into Iraq on the basis of a lie?"
"No, no, no," Kerry said. "Well, we didn’t know it was a lie at the time. You know the evidence that was produced, people didn’t know that it was a lie. So no, again, I think, you’re stretching something. That’s not a constructive way —"
"But he lied," Rochebin said of Bush. "He lied. He lied."
A flustered Kerry, who had also served as Secretary of State under the Obama administration, then said, "Sir, I’m not going to re-debate the Iraq war with you here right now. We spent a lot of time doing that previously. I was opposed to going in, I thought it was the wrong thing to do. But we gave the president the power, regrettably, in the Congress, based on the lie. And when we knew it was a lie, people stood up and did the right thing."
Rochebin came back with: "I get that. But you understand that for the countries of the South, of course, justice, equality, principles, it’s their impression that there is a double standard. And that weighs today, including on the debate of the climate," Rochebin said.
Journalist Glenn Greenwald later observed of the interview, in which a humiliated Kerry was clearly unprepared to be challenged and called out so directly, "The complete lack of self-awareness on the part of the US establishment sometimes shocks me, despite the contempt I harbor for them."

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • WBA -6.6%, APLD -6.4% (guidance), KFY -0.7%

Other news:

  • ACET -11.2% (data from ADI-001 Phase 1)
  • MGTX -2% (Clinical Data from the AQUAx Phase 1 Clinical Study of AAV2-hAQP1)
  • MLTX -1% (commences $250 mln public offering)
  • IDYA -0.8% (files mixed shelf)

Analyst comments:

  • ALE -1.7% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities)
  • EQIX -1.3% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at Truist)
  • GOOGL -0.8% (downgraded to Mkt Perform from Outperform at Bernstein)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • DAL +1.6% (guidance), ABCM +1.2% (guidance; also Starboard issues statement regarding the opportunity to maximize value at Abcam)

Other news:

  • AEL +14.3% (receives acquisition proposal from Brookfield Reinsurance for $55.00 per AEL share)
  • ACIU +12.1% (receives FDA fast track designation for anti-amyloid-beta active immunotherapy aci-24.060 to treat alzheimer's disease)
  • CIR +6.9% (enters into amendment to definitive merger agreement with KKR (KKR) at $51/share)
  • MOD +4.6% (Director sold $560K of stock)
  • INSE +4.5% (signs contract extension with bet365)
  • ALDX +3.9% (top-line results from the Phase 2 clinical trial of orally administered ADX-629)
  • SSYS +3.5% (3D Systems (DDD) submits enhanced proposal to combine with Stratasys)
  • TERN +3% (new preclinical data for TERN-601)
  • EWTX +2.8% (positive 12-month topline results from ARCH open label study)
  • IQ +2.2% (wins thirteen awards at the 2023 Shanghai TV Festival)
  • VRNA +2% (submits NDA to FDA for Ensifentrine for the Maintenance Treatment of COPD)
  • FREY +1.8% (announces key achievements ahead of capital markets day)
  • EGLE +1.6% (Danaos Corporation (DAC) Delivers Letter to Eagle Bulk Shipping Board of Directors)
  • LLY +1.6% (phase 2 retatrutide results published in The New England Journal of Medicine show the investigational molecule achieved up to 17.5% mean weight reduction at 24 weeks in adults with obesity and overweight )
  • EU +1.4% (announces agreement for at-the-market offering)
  • HOOD +1.3% (cutting 7% of its workforce according to WSJ)
  • EXPI +1% (increases repurchase cap by $500 mln)

Analyst comments:

  • GWRE +3.5% (upgraded to Buy from Hold at Stifel)
  • K +2.5% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman)
  • SAIA +2.2% (upgraded to Outperform from In-line at Evercore ISI)

WSJ : Japan Wades Into the Chip Wars

Japan Wades Into the Chip Wars
A state-backed fund’s offer for top chip-material maker JSR signals a stronger industrial-policy approach for Japan—previously the world’s dominant chip maker

Tiny semiconductor chips have become the heart of great-power competition.

Governments around the world are subsidizing chip makers. But until recently the main combatants were China, the U.S. and a few smaller economies punching above their weight such as South Korea and Taiwan.

Now the world’s third-largest economy—and a formidable technological giant—is entering the fray.

Japan is acting decisively to ensure leadership in key segments of the semiconductor supply chain—an echo of an earlier era of brawny industrial policy that helped it dominate key hard technology sectors like autos and chips in the 1970s and 1980s.

State-backed fund Japan Investment Corp. has launched a $6.3 billion offer to buy semiconductor-materials manufacturer JSR 4185 7.14%increase; green up pointing triangle, the latter confirmed Monday. JSR is the world’s largest maker of photoresist, a light-sensitive material that allows miniature circuits to be printed on silicon wafers.

The deal surprised markets as JSR, a profitable listed company, isn’t a typical target for JIC. Such state-backed funds are better known for rescuing struggling industrial giants like Japan Display and Sharp, or investing in smaller startups. JSR shares are now up 30% this week and are trading at a 3% discount to the offer price.

JSR says the transaction would create flexibility for strategic investments. It approached JIC in November believing a state-backed fund could provide stable, long-term capital—and strengthen its hand in any future negotiations with other industry players. JSR says it plans to relist in five to seven years.

Japan is already a dominant supplier of semiconductor materials. Apart from photoresist, Japanese companies are the biggest makers of silicon wafers and other materials such as fluorinated polyimide, used in smartphone displays. Japan caused a stir when it tightened export controls on three semiconductor materials, including photoresist, to South Korea in 2019.

But while Japanese companies dominate the supply of many of these materials, the domestic industry is fragmented. In photoresist, for example, JSR is the market leader, but Japanese rivals such as Tokyo Ohka Kogyo and Shin-Etsu aren’t far behind. That is probably why JSR and JIC are talking about a bolder restructuring of the domestic industry—to concentrate resources, integrate technology and maintain Japan’s competitiveness.

The JIC-JSR deal is likely just the beginning: The two have hinted at further consolidation that could create a national champion.

Japan is eager to revive its semiconductor fabrication industry, too—a sector that it used to dominate. Like other economies, it is subsidizing chip makers to build plants. While the country has been overtaken by Taiwan and South Korea in chip-making itself, Japan still has many pockets of strength in the sector. More government involvement to maintain the country’s leadership seems increasingly likely.

The global chip wars are heating up—and spreading.

WSJ : EV Startup Lordstown, Once an Ohio Town’s Savior, Files for Bankruptcy

EV Startup Lordstown, Once an Ohio Town’s Savior, Files for Bankruptcy
EV truck maker sues investment partner Foxconn, claiming it reneged on deal to acquire Lordstown shares

Lordstown RIDE -7.21%decrease; red down pointing triangle Motors, the electric-truck startup once cheered by investors during the SPAC boom and lauded by former President Donald Trump as a savior for a closed General Motors factory in Ohio, has filed for bankruptcy, the company said early Tuesday.

Lordstown’s filing came after talks with its investment partner, Taiwan-based contract-manufacturing giant Foxconn Technology, for it to purchase $170 million in shares of the electric-truck maker fell through, Lordstown said.

Lordstown sold its northeast Ohio factory, a former GM plant, to Foxconn in November 2021, after the startup ran into production issues. As part of the deal, Foxconn and Lordstown agreed to cooperate on a series of new vehicles, which were to be produced at the plant.

Early Tuesday, Lordstown said it was filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and would seek a buyer. At the same time, Lordstown sued Foxconn for fraud and breach of contract, alleging that the contract manufacturer’s actions “had the intended effect of destroying the business of an American start-up,” Lordstown said.

Foxconn said Tuesday that it had been in constructive negotiations with Lordstown to resolve its financial difficulties but that Lordstown had made “false comments and malicious attacks” against it and was reluctant to carry out their investment agreements. Further negotiations would be suspended, it added.

Lordstown is the latest company in a crop of aspiring EV manufacturers that have so far failed to deliver on their promises to revolutionize the car market. Many raised billions of dollars during the SPAC trend of a few years ago—reaping sensational gains on their initial public offerings—only to have their valuations deflate as they struggled to launch factory operations.

Lordstown once said it would produce hundreds of thousands of vehicles in the former GM plant in Lordstown, Ohio, but so far it has made only a handful of trucks. The company’s market capitalization has fallen to $47.49 million as of Monday, from a peak of about $5 billion in February 2021.

Even better-capitalized EV companies, including Rivian Automotive and luxury carmaker Lucid, have seen their cash piles and share prices dwindle. Both Rivian and Lucid have failed to meet earlier production goals as they faced parts shortages and manufacturing problems.

Market leader Tesla is a rare example of an EV company that survived its early years in the capital-intensive, low-margin auto industry. Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk, who went through his own self-described “production hell,” last year referred to car factories as “gigantic money furnaces.”

Many of the companies that attempted to follow in Tesla’s footsteps, including Lordstown, haven’t benefited from the same level of investor patience and abundant access to capital.

In late 2019, Lordstown seemingly materialized out of nowhere as GM executives had been taking heat from Trump for the Ohio factory’s closure earlier that year. Steve Burns, the entrepreneur behind Lordstown, had run a little-known Cincinnati-area electric-truck maker, Workhorse Group, for more than a decade, and founded a number of ventures unrelated to the automotive industry.

“I am not happy that it is closed when everything else in our Country is BOOMING,” Trump said on Twitter in March 2019, the month GM closed the factory. After news of a potential sale surfaced, Trump heaped praise on GM.

Lordstown bought GM’s plant for $20 million in November 2019. GM later forgave the purchase obligation and other loans and interest in exchange for 7.5 million shares, according to a regulatory filing. GM unloaded its stake last year.

Burns promised to quickly hire workers and increase production at the 6-million-square-foot factory. The name of the company’s first vehicle, the Endurance EV pickup truck, was meant to evoke a sense of hope that people placed in the region’s potential revival.

Lordstown went public in late 2020 through a merger with a special-purpose acquisition vehicle. This form of public offering became popular with many EV and battery companies because it was faster than a traditional initial public offering and subject to fewer regulatory controls.

Burns said at the time that Lordstown raised approximately $675 million through the deal, “more than enough funding to get us through initial production.” The company said it had 100,000 preorders for the Endurance.

The sprawling Lordstown plant had been an example of American manufacturing prowess when GM opened it in 1966, producing some of Chevrolet’s best-known vehicles, including the Impala and Bel Air. At its peak, the plant produced 500,000 vehicles a year.

When it produced its last Chevy Cruze sedan in March 2019, the plant employed roughly 1,400 people. It became a symbol of the decline of American manufacturing jobs and sparked a wave of migration from the region.

As Lordstown geared up to start factory output, short seller Hindenberg Research in March 2021 cast doubts on the automaker’s claims of 100,000 orders, saying the company had paid a consultant to generate perceived demand ahead of the company’s public debut. Burns said that the company had paid consultants to generate preorders, but denied misrepresenting the company’s orders.

A later investigation by the board of directors found that the company made inaccurate disclosures about its preorders, resulting in the resignations of the CEO and finance chief.

The company soon ran into cash problems as costs grew faster than anticipated. In June 2021, Lordstown said it lacked the funds to start mass producing vehicles and could run out of money before the end of the year unless it raised additional funds.

In the fall of that year, Lordstown agreed to sell the factory to contract manufacturer Foxconn for $230 million, a deal that included an additional $50 million purchase of Lordstown stock by Foxconn. In return, Lordstown would contract out the manufacturing of its Endurance truck to Foxconn.

Lordstown’s financial troubles continued despite the lifeline from Foxconn. The EV startup again cut its 2022 vehicle-production forecast, to 50 trucks from a planned 500.

In November, Foxconn agreed to invest an additional $170 million by purchasing Lordstown shares in tranches, according to a regulatory filing. The EV startup said it would use the funds to hire engineers and pay for the production of vehicles.

Foxconn’s initial round of share purchases added $52.7 million to Lordstown’s coffers. The second round of share sales, around $47.3 million, was to occur after regulatory approval of the sale.

That approval came in late April, but the funds didn’t materialize, Lordstown said. A week prior, Lordstown reported that it had run afoul of Nasdaq’s listing rules because the company’s share price had dipped below $1 for an extended period. As a result of that notice, Foxconn sent a message on April 21 that Lordstown violated the investment agreement between the two companies.

Lordstown said it was seeking to enforce the agreement, and would have to curtail operations or seek bankruptcy protection if it was unable to raise additional funds. The company recently laid off workers, some of whom were subsequently hired by Foxconn, the EV maker said.

A Monday deadline passed with Foxconn refusing to purchase the additional shares, Lordstown said in its lawsuit. The startup decided a deal with Foxconn was no longer possible, leading it to file for bankruptcy protection, the suit says.

FT : Naspers and Prosus to exit cross-shareholding

Naspers and Prosus to exit cross-shareholding
South African internet group owns more than a quarter of China’s Tencent

South African internet group Naspers and its investment arm Prosus, which owns 26 per cent of China’s Tencent, will unwind a complex set of shareholdings in each other that had threatened to impede stock buybacks funded by sales of the Chinese tech group’s shares.

Naspers said on Tuesday that Amsterdam-listed Prosus would exit a shareholding in its parent that it acknowledged “is widely seen as negative by shareholders”.

Naspers and Prosus have been selling their Tencent stock as part of a years-long effort to reduce a share price discount that in effect gives no value to its portfolio of global internet assets.

But the company said investors believed the “cross-holding structure introduces excessive complexity” and “should be removed”.

Naspers and Prosus exchanged stock in 2021 to tackle another factor in the discount, Naspers’ outsized weighting on South Africa’s stock market that was forcing fund managers to sell its shares.

Naspers and Prosus chief executive Bob van Dijk said the cross-holding had been needed to resolve the “clearly unsustainable situation” of Naspers making up a quarter of the Johannesburg bourse, “but it’s true that shareholders didn’t like it” and its purpose was served.

The structure meant that South African company law was also emerging as an obstacle to the buybacks because of a limit on how many shares subsidiaries could own in their parent.

“At some point Naspers will actually hit that limit,” said Basil Sgourdos, chief financial officer of Naspers and Prosus.

Prosus reported on Tuesday that core headline earnings fell to $2.7bn in the year to the end of March, down from $3.8bn in the previous financial year, after weaker performance from Tencent. 

Prosus is seeking to drive profits in other businesses, which stretch from online payments in India to South American food delivery and ownership of Stack Overflow, the Q&A platform for software engineers.

The Naspers investment in Tencent, which was made more than two decades ago into what was then a fledgling Chinese start-up, is seen as one of the greatest venture-capital bets of all time.

Naspers will remain the controlling shareholder in Prosus through super voting shares, but said the removal of the cross-holding would better reflect economic interests in the investment vehicle, under which Naspers holds 43 per cent and other shareholders 57 per cent.

The cross-shareholding will be ended through Naspers and Prosus each issuing new stock to shareholders without taking up their own rights to these shares.

FT : Brookfield offers to buy insurer American Equity for $4.3bn

Brookfield offers to buy insurer American Equity for $4.3bn
Deal would end tension with Canadian asset manager amid consolidation wave in annuities industry

Brookfield has offered to acquire American Equity Investment Life for $4.3bn, making it the latest private capital manager looking to expand in credit investing by adding retirement annuity and life insurance assets.

AEL, based in West Des Moines, Iowa, is one of a few independent annuities operators remaining amid a wave of consolidation and has more than $70bn in total assets. Private equity groups have bought up similar businesses as they aim to expand their investable assets.

Under the terms of the proposed transaction announced on Tuesday, Brookfield’s listed insurance affiliate, Brookfield Reinsurance, would acquire AEL shares for cash and stock for $55 each, an implied premium of 35 per cent to Friday’s closing price. Almost $40 of the per-share consideration is to be in cash, with the remainder to be paid in shares of Brookfield Asset Management, a listed affiliate of Brookfield.

A deal would end a public dispute that erupted last year, when a Brookfield executive resigned from the AEL board and criticised the company’s chief executive, Anant Bhalla, for what he said was a “fundamental change in the strategic direction of AEL”.

The insurer had entered into a multibillion-dollar reinsurance agreement with start-up private capital firm, 26North, founded by the longtime Apollo executive Josh Harris. AEL had also bought a $250mn stake in 26North. Brookfield demanded AEL explain the circumstances of the 26North transactions which it suggested was ill-conceived by Bhalla.

AEL fired back at Brookfield, calling the Canada-based group a “direct competitor” that could not remain on the board because in 2022 it acquired a Texas-based life insurer, American National, for $5bn.

AEL had long been coveted by investment managers as one of the last large “fixed-indexed” annuities merchants whose customer premiums could be invested in complex corporate loans and other fixed-income assets besides traditional bonds. In 2020, AEL had repelled an unsolicited joint bid from Apollo’s Athene unit, which had partnered with MassMutual.

At that time, Brookfield purchased a stake in AEL and entered into a reinsurance pact, which gave the asset manager responsibility for managing billions in AEL customer liabilities.

Bhalla took the helm of AEL in early 2020 and had been implementing a strategy he called “AEL 2.0” in which the company partnered with multiple alternative asset managers to more aggressively invest the funds of customers.

Amid the corporate governance turmoil late last year, AEL faced another unsolicited bid from Prosperity Life, a life insurer owned by Elliott Management. Prosperity dropped that $4bn offer early in 2023 after AEL’s board rebuffed it.

Brookfield last year listed a minority stake in BAM to unlock its public market value and create a currency to make purchases as the asset management industry consolidates.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

  • Gapping up:
    • AEL +9.1%, ALDX +6.3%, MOD +4.6%, INSE +4.5%, TERN +3%, EWTX +2.8%, FREY +2.8%, IQ +2.6%, EGLE +1.6%, EU +1.4%, ABCM +1.2%, EXPI +1%, LLY +1%, HOOD +0.9%, MBLY +0.6%, MSFT +0.5%
  • Gapping down:
    • ACET -11.6%, NDLS -4.8%, APLD -4.8%, MLTX -3.3%, FTI -2.5%, IDYA -0.8%, LTHM -0.7%

FT : Odey Asset Management suspends flagship hedge funds

Odey Asset Management suspends flagship hedge funds
UK hedge fund manager seeks to deal with investors’ withdrawal requests following FT investigation into founder

Odey Asset Management has suspended two of its hedge funds after investors sought to pull money following revelations of sexual misconduct allegations against founder Crispin Odey.

Odey European Inc, the firm’s flagship fund, and OEI Mac have had a high volume of redemption requests, prompting Odey Asset Management to suspend them, according to two people close to the firm.

In a letter to clients last week, the boards of the funds said they were “monitoring the level of redemptions received”, they said. Odey Asset Management declined to comment.

The suspensions come after Crispin Odey was removed from managing the funds earlier this month in the wake of the allegations reported by the Financial Times. Odey has strenuously denied the allegations.

The group’s banking partners, including Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley, have severed ties with the firm. These prime brokers provide hedge funds with lending to boost returns and derivatives to protect against losses.

Odey Asset Management has also been forced to suspend a number of other funds as clients have rushed for the exit.

Over the past couple of weeks, the firm has halted trading in Special Situations, Brook Developed Markets, LF Odey Portfolio and Brook Absolute Return. The Odey Swan fund, in which trading has been stopped, is being wound down.

Fund suspensions are aimed at providing managers with time to sell assets in an orderly fashion to meet redemption requests so that investors are not left nursing steep losses from fire sales.

The latest emergency measures come as the firm said it was in “advanced discussions” to transfer certain funds and staff to rival groups, although it has not named the other parties. Odey Asset Management, founded by Odey in 1991, manages about $4.4bn.

The firm has been selling down stakes in a number of stocks over the past couple of weeks, including currency printer De La Rue, in an attempt to meet the higher volume of withdrawal requests.

Filings show the asset manager sold 6 per cent of auto dealership Pendragon this month, reducing its stake to 4 per cent, as well as 2 per cent of The Restaurant Group. Odey Asset Management reduced its holding in small-cap stock Advanced Oncotherapy.

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group acquired Odey Asset Management’s 20 per cent stake in electronics vendor AO World, while investment trading business Plus500 bought back £101mn of its own shares from the asset manager.

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority announced restrictions last week on both Odey Wealth Management and Odey Asset Management, including an obligation to submit details of its bank accounts to the regulator each week and to seek regulatory approval for “extraordinary” payments above £20,000.

FT : China censors financial blogger as economic recovery falters

China censors financial blogger as economic recovery falters
Beijing worries negative sentiment could undermine efforts to spur growth

China is ramping up a crackdown on financial sector commentators, a move that erodes the space for independent analysis and data and challenges Beijing’s official narrative of the health of the world’s second-biggest economy.

Wu Xiaobo, one of China’s most prominent economic commentators with nearly 5mn followers on Weibo, was blocked on Monday alongside two unnamed writers, said the owner of the Twitter-like platform.

Sino Weibo, the social media platform’s owner, deleted Wu’s recent posts and said he had spread harmful information that undermined government policy, including manipulating unemployment rates and spreading false accusations against the securities market.

The decision to block Wu recalled a campaign launched in 2021 by the Cyberspace Administration of China to silence market sceptics and stifle pessimistic opinions about the Chinese economy. Last year, Hong Hao, an outspoken Chinese market strategist, was ousted from state-owned brokerage BoCom International over his bearish market commentaries.

The latest crackdown comes against a backdrop of rising concern over China’s rocky recovery from President Xi Jinping’s zero-Covid policies. Six months after authorities unwound pandemic restrictions, growth has struggled to take off, hampered by property sector weakness, slower than expected consumer spending and trade headwinds.

Youth unemployment hit a record hit 20.8 per cent last month, as the government struggled to find jobs for young people to drive the recovery.

China’s benchmark CSI 300 stock index has also badly underperformed global peers on broad disappointment with the economic rebound, down about 1 per cent year to date after falling more than a fifth in 2022. That compares with a 13 per cent gain for the S&P 500 this year.

Pressure has also been building on the Chinese currency. The renminbi touched a seven-month low against the dollar this week after falling roughly 5 per cent this year.

In the wake of a flurry of economic data that missed analysts’ expectations in recent weeks, economists have begun trimming their growth forecasts, and expectations are mounting for Beijing to intensify fiscal stimulus in an effort to spur growth.

Experts have also warned that censoring online commentators deepens the persistent difficulty of obtaining reliable data and information on China — a critical challenge for many countries and companies reliant on Chinese consumers and industry that has been exacerbated by a recent crackdown on foreign due diligence groups.

“It is alarming but it has been alarming for some time,” said Victor Shih, professor of Chinese political economy at the University of California, San Diego.

The latest targeting of financial bloggers, Shih added, most likely reflected policymakers’ concern that “a pervasive narrative that the economy is not doing very well” would undermine efforts to shore up the recovery.

“This kind of censorship is more geared towards the Chinese public, to make sure that there isn’t such a negative view on the Chinese economy.”